Sizing Calculations and Design Considerations for LID Treatment Measures

Similar documents
Sizing Criteria Worksheets and Examples

Guidance on Determining Feasibility and Sizing of Rainwater Harvesting Systems

EXAMPLE Stormwater Management Plans w/ CSS BMP Sizing Calculator (v2.1)

Background / Regulatory Requirements

Infiltration Guidelines

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES

Infiltration Guidelines

Porous Pavement Flow Paths

Bay Area Hydrology Model User Manual

Hydrology Study. Ascension Heights Subdivision Ascension Drive at Bel Aire Road San Mateo, California (Unincorporated)

Water Quality Management Plan

BRADLEY UNIVERSITY. The Performance and Sustainability of Permeable Pavement Progress Report on the Work Performed Under IAPA Scholarship

4.8. Subsurface Infiltration

Determination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities

BMP 6.4.4: Infiltration Trench

Bay Area Hydrology Model. User Manual

APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)

Rainfall, runoff and sediment transport in the Napa River watershed: now and a possible future

Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM) Software Introduction. Doug Beyerlein, P.E., P.H., D.WRE Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Mill Creek, Washington

4.8. Subsurface Infiltration

Decatur, Georgia Stormwater Management Policy Guidelines. DRAFT November 5, 2014

Stormwater Volume and Treatment Methods Simplifying the Numbers. IAFSM March 10, Presented by: Tom Powers P.E., CFM, LEED AP, CPESC

San Diego Hydrology Model (SDHM 3.0) Reviewer Workshop. Doug Beyerlein, P.E., P.H., D.WRE Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Mill Creek, Washington

Appendix B. Storm Drain System Data

Chatham Park Stormwater Manual

The Bay Area Hydrology Model A Tool for Analyzing Hydromodification Effects of Development Projects and Sizing Solutions

Appendix F: Sample Design Calculations & Worksheets Intentionally Left Blank

DRAINAGE DESIGN AND RUTTING PERFORMANACE GUIDELINES FOR PERMEABLE PAVEMENT

HYDROLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS. 22 nd Annual Nonpoint Source Pollution Conference Saratoga Springs, NY

MS4 Programs: Quality, the Other Stormwater Q. Dan Bounds, PE, D.WRE IAFSM March 9, 2017

Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Composite CN or Not? Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Treatment Volume: Calculation. Treatment Volume: Calculation

2011 Guidance Manual for Development Stormwater Quality Control Measures

Analysis of Runoff Reduction and Hydrologic Cycle Utilizing LID Concepts

Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis

Preliminary Drainage Analysis

Pre-Treatment Bioretention Cells Bioswales IOWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL DECEMBER 16, 2015

Activity Calculating Property Drainage

New Draft Model BMP Design Manual for San Diego Region

CASE STUDIES: BMPTRAINS MODEL

City of Redwood City Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program. Drainage Guidelines for Residential Development

HYDROLOGIC-HYDRAULIC STUDY ISABELLA OCEAN RESIDENCES ISLA VERDE, CAROLINA, PR

Bay Area Hydrology Model

Riverside County. Stormwater Quality Best Management Practice. Design Handbook

At least 2 feet above the seasonal high water table Overflow path or structure provided

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT NEWCASTLE FIRE STATION OLD STATE HIGHWAY

RCFC&WCD LID TESTING AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

Paraprofessional Training Session 1

3.4 Harvest and Use BMPs

Chapter 3 Calculating the WQCV and Volume Reduction

Hydrologic Impacts of Exceeding Zoning Ordinances. on Impervious Lot Coverage: TR-55 modeling of three. Zoning Districts in Shippensburg Borough

Sunset Circle Vegetated Swale and Infiltration Basin System Monitoring Report: Rainy Seasons and

Modelling LIDs using PCSWMM and EPA SWMM5. March 28, 2012 Presented by: Rob James (CHI) Credit to: Lewis Rossman (US EPA)

A Case for the Design and Modeling of BMP Infiltration and LID Techniques. By: Bob Murdock

Incorporating Green Infrastructure for Stormwater Management at Airports

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. Synthetic Turf Athletic Field Drainage Design Assistance

Simple Method for Estimating Phosphorus Export

Chapter 3 Dispersion BMPs

HYDROLOGY STUDY PREPARED FOR: MARKHAM PERRIS LLC 302 WEST FIFTH STREET, SUITE 103 SAN PEDRO, CA (310) FOR THE PROJECT:

Appendix G Preliminary Hydrology Study

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

A detailed guide and sizing manual for the application of Silva Cells to meet the requirements of bioretention under paving.

Stormwater and LEED. Vancouver LEED User s Group May 27, Craig Kipkie, M.Sc., P.Eng, LEED AP

LID & Detention Pond Sizing Tool to Address Hydromodification and Water Quality in Clackamas County

StormwaterWise Landscapes: Pervious Surfaces Specifications

Municipal Stormwater Ordinances Summary Table

BMP #: Infiltration Basin

PERVIOUS PAVEMENT. Alternative Names: Permeable Pavement, Porous Concrete, Porous Pavers

ATTACHMENT 4 Section Project Status Quarterly Report - Dec 31, 2015 Measure V - Clean Beaches and Ocean Parcel Tax

Our Eastern Shore Groundwater Part IV Groundwater Quality on the Eastern Shore: How safe is our groundwater and are there ways we can protect it?

Hydrology Study. For Bella Terrazza Portion of Lot 1, Block 39, Subdivision of S Tract, Rancho El Cajon El Cajon, CA 92021

Rainwater Harvesting for Irrigation

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

Final Water Quality Management Plan

DIVISION 5 STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA

Tucson Water s Rainwater Harvesting Incentive Workshop Provided as a community service by

Boise City Public Works General Drainage Plan Review Requirements Checklist

Rainfall, Runoff and Peak Flows: Calibration of Hydrologic Design Methods for the Kansas City Area

ANDREW BILLING, P.E., CFM, LEED GREEN ASSOCIATE Lead Stormwater Reviewer CITY OF CHICAGO, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS

FocalPoint as an Acceptable Alternative Biofiltration Practice

State-of-the-Practice Porous Asphalt Pavements. Kent R. Hansen, P.E. Director of Engineering National Asphalt Pavement Association

Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

Water Balance Methodology

SUBSURFACE INFILTRATION SYSTEM DESCRIPTION. Alternative Names: Sump, Drywell, Infiltration Trench, Infiltration Galleries, Leach Fields

Sand Filter T-6. Description. Site Selection

Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan

Permeable Pavement for Stormwater Management Porous Pavement

Infiltration Stormwater Control Measures. Andrew R. Anderson, M.S., E.I.T. Extension Associate Engineer

To The Applicant For A Small Wastewater System Permit Sheridan County, Wyoming

Stormwater Management Standards for Pennsylvania. Another. A presentation from The Other Side of the Table

Appendix I OFFICE OF THE MORGAN COUNTY SURVEYOR STORMWATER DESIGN MANUAL 7/1/2008

PROJECT AT THE DENVER

Chapter Eight. POST-CONSTRUCTION WATER QUALITY BMPs

Urbanizing Watersheds: Green Infrastructure and Hydrologic Function. Jay Dorsey, PE, PhD ODNR-DSWR October 30, 2014

Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California

Module 10b: Gutter and Inlet Designs and Multiple Design Objectives

Review of State and Federal Stormwater Regulations November 2007

CHAPTER 3 STORMWATER HYDROLOGY. Table of Contents SECTION 3.1 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING STORMWATER RUNOFF

Stormwater Management Fact Sheet: Porous Pavement

Transcription:

SCVURPPP C.3 Workshop December 18, 2012 Sizing Calculations and Design Considerations for LID Treatment Measures Jill Bicknell, P.E., EOA, Inc. Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program

Presentation Overview Determining Water Quality Design Flow and Volume ( Q BMP and V BMP ) Sizing Bioretention and Flow-Through Planters Sizing Pervious Paving and Infiltration Trenches Sizing Rainwater Harvesting Cisterns Sizing Non-LID Components

C.3.d Sizing Criteria Volume-based sizing criteria: URQM Method - use formula and volume capture coefficients in Urban Runoff Quality Management, WEF/ASCE MOP No. 23 (1998), pages 175-178 CASQA BMP Handbook Method - Determine volume equal to 80% of the annual runoff, using methodology in Appendix D of the CASQA BMP Handbook (2003) using local rainfall data Sizing curves specific to Santa Clara Valley provided in Appendix B of C.3 Handbook

CASQA BMP Sizing Curves

SCVURPP C.3 Handbook, Appendix B: Unit Basin Storage Volume - 80% Capture (in.) San Jose Rain Gage, 1% Slope Percent Imperviousness

C.3.d Sizing Criteria Flow-based sizing criteria: Factored Flood Flow - 10% of the 50-year peak flow rate, determined using Intensity-Duration-Frequency curves published by the local flood control agency Percentile Rainfall Intensity - Flow of runoff produced by a rain event equal to two times the 85th percentile hourly rainfall intensity Data for Santa Clara Valley rain gages in Sizing Worksheets (Appendix B of C.3 Handbook) Uniform Intensity - Flow of runoff resulting from a rain event equal to 0.2 inches per hour intensity

Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curve (50-Year Return Period)

C.3.d Sizing Criteria 85 th Percentile Rainfall Intensity Data: Reference Rain Gages 85 th Percentile Hourly Rainfall Intensity (in/hr) Design Rainfall Intensity (in/hr)* San Jose Airport 0.087 0.17 Palo Alto 0.096 0.19 Morgan Hill 0.12 0.24 *Design rainfall intensity = 2 X 85 th percentile hourly rainfall intensity By comparison, Uniform Intensity = 0.2 in/hr

C.3.d Sizing Criteria Flow-based sizing criteria: Simplified Sizing Approach Variation of Uniform Intensity Method (0.2 in/hr) The surface area of a biotreatment measure is sized to be 4% of the contributing impervious area Based on a runoff inflow of 0.2 in/hr (assume equal to the rainfall intensity), with an infiltration rate through the biotreatment soil of 5 in/hr (0.2 in/hr 5 in/hr = 0.04) Conservative approach because does not account for surface ponding good for planning purposes

C.3.d Sizing Criteria Combination Flow & Volume Design Basis: Treatment systems can be sized to treat at least 80% of total runoff over the life of the project Option 1: Use a continuous simulation hydrologic model (typically not done for treatment measures) Option 2: Show how treatment measure sizing meets both flow and volume-based criteria Used for bioretention and flow-through planters Need to compute both design volume and flow by previously described methods

Flow- or Volume-Based Sizing for Treatment Measures? Table 5-1 Flow and Volume Based Treatment Measure Sizing Criteria Type of Treatment Measure LID? Hydraulic Sizing Criteria Bioretention area Yes Flow- or volume-based or combination Flow-through planter box Yes Flow- or volume-based or combination Tree well filter Yes Flow-based Infiltration trench Yes Volume-based Subsurface infiltration system Yes Volume-based Rainwater harvesting and use Yes Volume-based Media filter No Flow-based Extended detention basin No Volume-based

Sizing Criteria Worksheets Appendix B of SCVURPPP C.3 Handbook Worksheets for determining water quality design flow and volume Figure B-1: Soil Texture and Mean Annual Precipitation (MAP) Depths Figures B-2 B-7: Unit Basin Storage Volume for 80% Capture (3 gages, 1% and 15% slopes) Figure B-8: Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves for 50-year Return Period (4 gages)

Figure B-1: Soil Texture and Mean Annual Precipitation (MAP) Depth

Sizing Example #1 Parking lot in Santa Clara Area = 35,000 sq. ft. (0.80 acres) 100% impervious asphalt Slope = 1% Mean annual precipitation (MAP) = 15 inches 35,000 sq. ft. Use the sizing worksheets to determine Q BMP and V BMP Answer: V BMP = 1,819 cu. ft.; Q BMP = 0.10 cfs

Sizing Bioretention Facilities Simplified Sizing Approach Surface area is 4% of contributing impervious area Does not consider storage in surface ponding area Volume Based Approach Store V BMP in just surface ponding area Store V BMP in ponding area, soil media & drain rock Combination Flow and Volume Approach Compute both Q BMP and V BMP Route through facility, allowing ponding

Sizing Bioretention Facilities: Simplified Approach Example #1: Parking lot in Santa Clara Area = 35,000 sq. ft. (0.80 acres) Simplified sizing approach: surface area of bioretention facility is 4% of contributing impervious area 35,000 sq. ft. Surface area = 35,000 0.04 = 1,400 sq. ft.

Sizing Bioretention Facilities: Volume-Based Approach V 1 V 2 V 3

Sizing Bioretention Facilities: Volume-Based Approach Method 1: Store entire volume in surface ponding area V 1 Depth (ft) Porosity Volume per sq. ft. (cubic feet) 0.5 1.0 0.5 Surface Area = V BMP (cu.ft.) 0.5 cu.ft./sq.ft. For Example #1: Surface Area = 1,819 cu.ft. 0.5 cu.ft./sq.ft. = 3,638 sq. ft.

Sizing Bioretention Facilities: Volume-Based Approach Method 2: Store volume in ponding area and media V 1 V 2 Depth (ft) Porosity Volume per sq. ft. (cubic feet) 0.5 1.0 0.5 1.5 0.30 0.45 V 3 0.5* 0.40 0.20 *Depth below bottom of underdrain Total 1.15 Surface Area = V BMP (cu.ft.) 1.15 cu.ft./sq.ft. For Example #1: Surface Area = 1,819 cu.ft. 1.15 cu.ft./sq.ft. = 1,582 sq. ft.

Sizing Bioretention Facilities: Flow & Volume Approach Hydrograph Approach Runoff is routed through the treatment measure Assume rectangular hydrograph that meets both flow and volume criteria

Sizing Bioretention Facilities: Flow & Volume Approach 5 in/hr Determine V BMP Assume a constant rainfall intensity of 0.2 in/hr continues throughout the storm (rectangular hydrograph) Calculate the duration of the storm by dividing the Unit Basin Storage volume by the rainfall intensity Calculate the volume of runoff that filters through the biotreatment soil at a rate of 5 in/hr over the duration of the storm and the volume that remains on the surface

Sizing Bioretention Facilities: Flow & Volume Approach 5 in/hr To start the calculation, you have to assume a surface area A S -- use 3% of the contributing impervious area as a first guess Determine volume of treated water V T during storm: V T = A S x 5 in/hr x duration (hrs) x 1 in/12 ft Determine volume remaining on the surface V S : V S = V BMP V T Determine depth D of ponding on the surface: D = V S A S Repeat until depth is approximately 6 inches

Sizing Example #1, continued Parking lot in Santa Clara Area = 35,000 sq. ft. (0.8 acres) 100% impervious V BMP = 1,819 cu. ft. Adjusted UBS Volume = 0.63 in. 35,000 sq. ft. Use the combination flow and volume sizing worksheet to determine the bioretention surface area Answer: 1,000 sq. ft. (depth of 0.5 ft.)

Sizing Bioretention Facilities: Comparison of Methods Example: 35,000 sq. ft. parking lot in Santa Clara MAP= 15 inches, 100% impervious V BMP = 1,819 cu. ft. (80% of annual runoff) Sizing Method Surface Area (sq. ft.) Simplified Method (flow-based) 1,400 Volume ponded on surface 3,638 Volume stored in unit (V 1 +V 2 +V 3 ) 1,582 Combination flow & volume 1,000

Sizing Pervious Paving and General Principles Infiltration Trenches Store the design volume V BMP in void space of stone base/subbase and infiltrate into subgrade Surface allows water to infiltrate at a high rate (assume does not limit flow into pervious paving) Any underdrains must be placed above the void space needed to store and infiltrate the design volume

Sizing Pervious Paving and Pervious Paving Infiltration Trenches May be self-treating area or self-retaining area (accept runoff from other areas) Can only be considered a pervious area if stone base/subbase sized to store the design volume Can work where native soils have low infiltration rates (stored water depths are relatively small) Surface area is usually predetermined Base and subbase thickness usually determined by expected traffic load and saturated soil strength Slope should be 1% (or use cutoff trenches)

Pervious Paving Typical Section Paving surface Bedding No. 8 stone 4 in. Base No. 57 stone Thickness varies Subbase No. 2 stone Base and subbase layers available for water storage Both typically have 40% void space

Pervious Paving Approach to Sizing Pervious Paving Self-Treating Use Unit Basin Storage (UBS) Volume as V BMP Check the depth of the UBS volume in base/subbase: UBS volume (in.) 0.40 = Depth (in.) Example: UBS volume = 1.0 in., depth = 2.5 in. (Minimum depth for vehicular traffic is 10 in.) Check the time required for stored water to drain: UBS Vol. (in.) Infiltration rate (in/hr) = Drain time (hrs) ( recommend < 48 hrs)

Pervious Paving Self-Retaining (receives runoff from adjacent areas) Add the V BMP for adjacent areas to the V BMP for the pervious paving area itself (should not exceed 2:1 ratio of contributing area to pervious area) Divide total V BMP by pervious paving area and convert to inches Check depth of total V BMP in base/subbase: Total V BMP (in.) 0.40 = Depth (in.) Example: Total V BMP = 3.0 in., depth = 7.5 in. Check the time required for stored water to drain: Total V BMP (in.) Infiltration rate (in/hr) = Drain time (hrs)

Pervious Paving Conclusions/Recommendations 1. Pervious paving can work with any soil type if used as a self-treating area or as a self-retaining area with small impervious areas draining to it (e.g., sidewalks) 2. If a pervious paving area is a self-retaining area for large adjacent impervious areas, soils should have sufficient infiltration capacity to drain stored water within 72 hours 3. Do not allow pervious areas to drain onto pervious paving areas to prevent clogging 4. If drain large roof areas to pervious paving, consider pre-treatment filters on downspouts (and #2 above)

Infiltration Trench Sizing Differences from Pervious Paving More runoff must infiltration in a smaller footprint Infiltration rate of site soils must be at least 0.5 in/hr (i.e., not suitable for C or D soils Trench depths are typically between 3 and 8 feet Infiltration trench is an infiltration device Minimum 10-foot separation from seasonal high groundwater level Must meet other MRP and SCVWD requirements Cannot be deeper than wide (Class V injection well)

Infiltration Trench Sizing Design Parameters Trench depth is calculated based on the soil infiltration rate, aggregate void space, and the trench storage time The stone aggregate used in the trench is typically 1.5 to 2.5 inches in diameter, which provides a void space of approximately 35 % Trenches should drain within 72 hours Place underdrain above void space needed for design volume

Infiltration Trench Sizing Approach to Sizing Infiltration Trenches Trench unit storage volume: S = n d n = gravel porosity (0.35); d = gravel depth (ft) Subsoil unit infiltration capacity: S i = k t 12 k = subsoil permeability (in/hr); t = time (hrs) Check for trench drainage by infiltration: 1 sq.ft. d If S S i : Increase depth of media until S = S i to match trench capacity to infiltration capacity (may decrease surface area needed) If S > S i : Decrease depth of media until S = S i (surface area may increase)

Infiltration Trench Sizing Approach to Sizing Infiltration Trenches, cont. Determine required trench area: A T = V BMP S A T = Trench area required to store treatment volume (sq. ft.) V BMP = Treatment volume (cu. ft.) S = Trench unit storage volume (ft.) Determine required trench width: W = A T L W = Width of trench (ft.) A T = Required trench area (sq. ft.) L = Length of trench (ft.) (normally length of treatment area)

Sizing Rainwater Harvesting Cisterns Rainwater Harvesting and Use Types of Demands Irrigation Toilet flushing Other non-potable Volume based sized criteria in C.3.d is 80% capture of the annual runoff Key concept is drawdown time Barriers: lack of plumbing codes, treatment, recycled water preference

Storage values are per one acre of impervious surface

Estimate Actual Demand Daily Use Rates for Toilets and Urinals 1 Land Use Type User Unit User Unit Factor 2 Residential Resident 2.9 residents per dwelling unit Daily Use/Unit (gal/day/unit) 8.6 Office or Retail Employee (non-visitor) 200 SF per employee 6.9 Schools Employee (not including students) 50 SF per employee 33.9 1 References: CCCWP Stormwater C.3 Guidebook, 6 th edition, 2012; BASMAA LID Feasibility Report, 2011; California Plumbing Code, 2010. 2 Use project-specific data if available

Example: 2-story Office Building 3,000 SF 10,000 SF (Interior floor area = 18,000 SF) 4,000 SF

Screening Worksheet Results Potential rainwater capture area = area of one building roof = 10,000 SF Convert to acres: 10,000 SF 43,560 SF/acre = 0.23 acres Demand for commercial building: Interior floor area = 18,000 SF Minimum floor area to meet toilet flushing demand = 70,000 SF per acre of impervious surface Minimum floor area for this project to meet demand = 70,000 SF/ac X 0.23 acres = 16,100 SF 18,000 SF > 16,100 SF Building will have minimum toilet flushing demand

Determine Building Toilet Flushing Demand Building interior floor area = 18,000 SF Estimate no. of employees: 18,000 SF 200 SF/employee = 90 employees 90 employees 6.9 gpd/employee = 621 gpd Convert to equivalent demand per impervious acre (to allow use of sizing curves): 10,000 SF roof area 43,560 SF/ac = 0.23 ac. 621 gpd 0.23 = 2,700 gpd per impervious acre

Determine Required Cistern Size From sizing curves, find right combination of drawdown time, tank size and required demand: 480-hr (20-day) drawdown 49,000 gallon tank 2,450 gpd 360-hr (15-day) drawdown 40,000 gallon tank 2,667 gpd Adjust tank size back to actual impervious area: 40,000-gallon tank per 1 acre impervious area 40,000 0.23 acres = 9,200-gallon tank

Sizing Non-LID Components Media Filters (cartridge type) Flow-based Treatment Measure Determine Q BMP From manufacturer s specifications, determine the design flow rate per cartridge Divide Q BMP by the cartridge flow rate to calculate the number of cartridges required (round up)

Sizing Non-LID Components High Flow Rate Tree Box Filters Flow-based Treatment Measure Determine Q BMP From manufacturer s specifications, determine the appropriate size of unit or combination of units A tree box filter that uses biotreatment soil can be sized like a bioretention area or flow-through planter

Sizing Non-LID Components Detention Basin Volume-based Treatment Measure (can only be used in treatment train) Determine V BMP Design outlet for 48-hour detention time If sizing for hydromodification management, use Bay Area Hydrology Model to determine size to meet HM standards

??? Questions??? Contact Information: Jill Bicknell 408-720-8811, X 1 jcbicknell@eoainc.com www.scvurppp.org