NJDEP Vapor Intrusion Guidance

Similar documents
VAPOR INTRUSION TECHNICAL GUIDANCE

VAPOR INTRUSION TECHNICAL GUIDANCE

Oregon Guidance for Assessing and Remediating Vapor Intrusion in Buildings

Proposed Changes to EPA s Spreadsheet Version of Johnson & Ettinger Model (and some new spreadsheet tools)

PA Vapor Intrusion Guidance

August Vapor Intrusion Guidance FAQs

A REVIEW OF VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE BY STATE

PVI Risk Pathway: Sampling Considerations

Is this the maturation Phase of Vapor Intrusion Investigations?

Best management practices for vapor investigation and building mitigation decisions

Atlantic RBCA Guidance for Soil Vapour and Indoor Air Monitoring Assessments: Overview. December 7 th, 2006 Moncton, New Brunswick

Vapor Intrusion Regulatory Guidance and IRIS Updates with Mitigation Case Studies. Richard J. Rago Haley & Aldrich 20 June 2012

EPA S 2015 vapor intrusion guides What do they mean for your facility?

November 8, 2016 International Petroleum Environmental Conference. Tim Nickels Pastor, Behling & Wheeler, LLC

H&H Job No. DS0-05. April 29, South Tryon Street Suite 100 Charlotte, NC

Evaluation of Spatial and Temporal Variability in VOC Concentrations at Vapor Intrusion Investigation Sites.

Use of Crawl Space Sampling Data and Other Lines of Evidence for Evaluating Vapor Intrusion

VAP Introduction to the Voluntary Action Program. Division of Emergency and Remedial Response

Steps in Conducting Structural Vapor Intrusion Potential Evaluations Under the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch 13 February 2017

Vapor Intrusion Issues

Empirical Data to Evaluate the Occurrence of Sub-slab O 2 Depletion Shadow at Petroleum Hydrocarbon- Impacted Vapor Intrusion Sites

MEMO. Kris Hinskey

MEMORANDUM. To: Billy Meyer. Christie Zawtocki, PE Timothy Klotz. Date: April 8, 2014

COMMENTS RECEIVED ON PROPOSED GUIDANCE Land Recycling Program Technical Guidance Manual Section IV.A.4 Vapor Intrusion into Buildings from

Limited Remedial Action Reference Documentation For Site Professionals

Example Application of Long Term Stewardship for the Chlorinated Vapor Intrusion Pathway (and VOC sources)

A Comparison of BioVapor and Johnson and Ettinger Model Predictions to Field Data for Multiple Sites

Environmental Site Assessment for Limited Remediation Protocol

Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Methods & Strategies

The Evolution of Engineering and Institutional Controls in New Jersey

Evaluation of Vapor Intrusion from a Subsurface Diesel Plume UsingM ultiple Lines of Evidence

Using Fate and Transport Models to Evaluate Cleanup Levels

Updated Massachusetts Indoor Air Quality Threshold Values: A Case Study

UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF SEWER PREFERENTIAL PATHWAYS IN VAPOR INTRUSION. Thomas McHugh, Ph.D., D.A.B.T. Lila Beckley, P.G.

PROPOSED DECISION DOCUMENT. CE - E. 19th St. Station Voluntary Cleanup Program New York, New York County Site No. V00542 October 2017

Examples of Data Collection Strategies and Methods

Modeling the Vapor Intrusion Pathway: Revisions to the MCP GW-2 Groundwater Standards

U.S. EPA s Vapor Intrusion Database: Preliminary Evaluation of Attenuation Factors

7.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES

APPLICATION OF SUBSURFACE VAPOUR ASSESSMENT AT HYDROCARBON IMPACTED SITES

Endpoint Selection Standard. Saskatchewan Environmental Code

Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. For More Information

Vapor Intrusion: A State s Perspective

Indiana Perspectives on the Use of Institutional Controls for Leaking UST Sites. ASTSWMO LUST and State Fund-Financial Responsibility Workshop

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore Maryland

VAPOR INTRUSION FROM REGULATORY, TECHNICAL,

Professional Services HCR is a one-stop shop for all your design and construction needs.

Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Factors Based On Long Term Monitoring Data

EPA s Final Vapor Intrusion Guidance

Screening Criteria to Evaluate Vapor Intrusion Risk from Lead Scavengers

March 16, Dear Mr. Chapman:

Enhanced Anaerobic Biodegradation of a Refinery Benzene Groundwater Plume

GUIDE FOR THE SUBMISSION OF REMEDIAL ACTION WORKPLANS

Case Study of Modeled and Observed TCE Attenuation from Groundwater to Indoor Air. Christopher G. Lawless Johnson Wright, Inc.

Vapor Intrusion Risk Pathway: Updates & Hot topics

Sustainability; in Residential, Commercial and Industrial Buildings

Soil Gas Sampling for Vapor Intrusion Assessments: Key Issues

2. Appendix Y: Vapor Intrusion Modeling Requirements (Appendix to Statewide health standard VI guidance in the Technical Guidance Manual)

CHROMIUM EXPOSURE AND HEALTH EFFECTS IN HUDSON COUNTY

PermeOx. Plus. Enhanced Aerobic Biodegradation

Remediation Progress at California LUFT Sites: Insights from the GeoTracker Database

Updated J&E Model VIAModel.xls

EPA Region 6 CORRECTIVE ACTION STRATEGY

CITY PLACE SANTA CLARA: ADDRESSING VAPOR INTRUSION IN A MASSIVE LANDFILL REDEVELOPMENT

Lessons from Petroleum Hydrocarbon and Chlorinated Solvent Sites Extensively Monitored for Vapor Intrusion

Draft Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Information Paper. Michael Lowry, RTI International Matthew Young, EPA OUST

Exclusion Distance Criteria for Assessing Potential Vapour Intrusion at Petroleum Hydrocarbon Sites

Presenter Bios. Finding Practical Solutions for the Chlorinated Vapor Intrusion Pathway: Helping RCRA Facilities Meet Significant Challenges

OCTOBER 2014 UPDATE: A YEAR OF REAL PROGRESS IN ALL AREAS

Effects of Alternate Petroleum Hydrocarbon Sources in the Vadose Zone on the Vapor Intrusion Pathway beneath a Residential Community

ESTCP Research on Optimization of Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Systems in Large Military Buildings

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASSIFICATION EXCEPTION AREA / WELL RESTRICTION AREA (CEA/WRA) FACT SHEET FORM

THERMAL REMEDIATION OF A CLOSED GASOLINE SERVICE STATION PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION LED BY: GLEN VALLANCE PROJECT MANAGER, CGRS

Technical and Regulatory Guidance Supplement

THOMAS K. UZZO, LSRP, PEA President

Characterizing TCE Exposure Distribution for Occupants of Houses with Basements

FINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION

Vapor Encroachment Screening Under the Newly-Revised ASTM E Standard

ISOTEC Case Study No. 67 ISCO TREATMENT PROGRAM: IMPACTED GROUNDWATER TREATMENT UTILIZING ACTIVATED SODIUM PERSULFATE

DuPont Pompton Lakes Works Contaminated Sites/Neighborhoods Pompton Lakes, New Jersey

A Stakeholder s Guide to New Construction at Vapor Intrusion Sites By Lenny Siegel December, 2016

August 14, Dear Mr. Chapman:

April 8, 2015 Olympic Medical Center Rebecca Lawson, P.E. LHG. Connie Groven, P.E. Audrey Kuklok

DOCUMENTATION OF DUE CARE COMPLIANCE REPORT

Site Specific Remediation Objectives for Soil Vapour in Alberta (Draft) Norman Sawatsky

An Integrated Model for Design of Soil Vapour Intrusion Mitigation Systems

Vapor Intrusion in New York: Five Years After Release of New York s Strategy and Vapor Intrusion Guidance By Katherine Rahill

MTBE Fact Sheet #2 Remediation Of MTBE Contaminated Soil And Groundwater Background

Risk Management Plan Quail Dry Cleaners DSCA ID No Charlotte, Mecklenburg County H&H Job No. DS0-29D. Table of Contents

Soil Vapor Intrusion Training In The New Economy*

ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Consulting & Management

Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites in New Zealand (Revised 2011)

S-ISCO REMEDIATION OF COAL TAR

Remedial Action Permits and SRP Current Topics. October 7 and 28, 2010

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Soil Vapor Extraction Subsurface Performance Checklist

Vapour Intrusion Regulatory Framework and Case Law Review

Closed Castner Firing Range Remedial Investigation. Technical Project Planning (TPP) Meeting #4 07 November :00 AM 11:00 AM

New Data on Attenuation Coefficients for Crawl Spaces and Deep Soil Gas from the Lowry AFB Site, Denver, Colorado

6. Organic Compounds: Hydrocarbons. General Comments Borden, Canada, tracer test Laurens, SC, gasoline spill Bemidji, MN, crude oil spill

STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL- SITE INVESTIGATION AND RESTORATION BRANCH

Transcription:

NEW JERSEY VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE Kenneth J. Kloo, Brownfield Administrator ASTSWMO 2008 Mid-Year Meeting Mobile, Alabama April 23 & 24, 2008

NJDEP Vapor Intrusion Guidance VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION October 2005

Vapor Intrusion Commercial/Industrial Worker Working over Plume Resident Living over Plume Basement or Crawl Space Without Basement Indoor Air Vadose Zone Soil Gas Soil / GW Contamination Migration of plume vapors to indoor air

Stages of VI Pathway Assessment Preliminary Assessment & Site Investigation Stage 1 Assess potential for Vapor Intrusion Stage 2 Stage 3 Remedial Investigation Stage 4 Stage 5 Rapid Action Determination Evaluate Existing Data Against Generic Screening Levels Develop & Implement VI Investigation Workplan: 4A. Delineate GW contamination 4B. Investigate soil gas 4C. Conduct sub-slab slab and indoor air sampling Evaluate RI Data Using Generic Screening Levels

Stages of VI Pathway Assessment Remedial Investigation (continued) Stage 6 Prepare and Implement Site-Specific Investigative Approach Stage 7 Evaluate Data using Generic Screening or Site-Specific Screening Levels Remediation & Monitoring Stage 8 Stage 9 Stage 10 Stage 11 Determine Appropriate Remedial Action Implement Remedial Action, including Institutional and Engineering Controls Establish a Long-Term Monitoring Program Assess Ability to Terminate Remedial Action

Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels Ground Water Screening Level - calculated using the Johnson & Ettinger (J&E) Model with NJ specific parameters GWSL for Alternate Soil Textures - developed based on lab soil grain size analysis of site soils Indoor Air Screening Level - both residential and non-residential values are updated every six months Soil Gas Screening Level - Calculated using the health based Indoor Air Screening values and an attenuation factor of 0.02 02

Other Screening Levels NJDEP has included additional screening levels: Rapid Action Levels (RAL): trigger levels for the initiation of prompt action 100X cancer health h based residential i IASL 2X noncancer health based residential IASL Health Department Notification Levels (HDNL): trigger levels for the notification of local health department and/or NJ Department of Health & Senior Services (NJDHSS) certain authorities reside with the Health Department

Petroleum Hydrocarbons & Biodegradation The Department recognizes biodegradation occurs GWSLs include a multiplier (10X) for benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene and total xylenes to address biodegradation Multiplier assumes a minimum of 4% oxygen in soil column below structure 30-foot distance criterion for all petroleum-related compounds (but not free product)

Background Indoor Air Contamination SOURCES Consumer Activities Household Products Building Materials & Furnishings Ambient (outside) Air Laboratory Contaminants ACTION Multiple Lines of Evidence Approach

Multiple Lines of Evidence Soil vapor spatial concentrations Groundwater spatial ldata Background (internal and external) Sources Building Construction and Current Condition Sub-slab b Soil Gas Data Indoor Air Data Constituent Ratios

Investigative Tools Groundwater Sampling Soil Gas Sampling Indoor Air Sampling Modeling Sub-Slab Soil Gas Sampling Crawl Space Air Sampling Exterior verses Interior Sampling Passive verses Active Sampling Supplemental Tools / Data

Decision Flow Chart for Vapor Intrusion Pathway Remediation Decision Matrix - Stage 8 Indoor Air Concentrations (for COCs) < IASL >IASL Sub-Slab Soil Gas Concentra ations (for COCs) <SGSL >SGSL to 10X SGSL >10X SGSL No Action No Action or Monitor Monitor or Mitigate No Action * (if no other subsurface source) Investigate further or Mitigate Mitigate Notes: * Investigator should consider the potential for vadose zone (soil) contamination and/or preferential pathways as part of the assessment of vapor intrusion before concluding "no further action" Red Decision Points - investigators should use professional judgement when determining which action is appropriate. Factors to consider include the relative exceedance of the screening level, the ratio of the sub-slab slab soil gas and indoor air results, building construction, and possible affects of background sources of contamination and sampling errors. (Refer to Chapter 7, Evaluation of Analytical Results, for more guidance and information.) Page 4 of 4

Remedial Action Vapor intrusion i remediation - most common are depressurization or SVE systems Reducing vapor intrusion exposure - non-permanent, engineering controls Future use must be considered when vapor intrusion present - institutional controls may be required NJ Certified Radon Mitigation Business - alternately, utilize a licensed Professional Engineer

Mitigation of the VI Pathway Passive barriers Sub-slab depressurization Sub-membrane depressurization Passive venting Sub-slab pressurization Indoor air treatment Building pressurization

RA Sampling Requirements Confirmation IA Sampling - required 2-4 weeks after system is installed - subsequent sampling if initial round not during winter/early spring - any system modifications will require additional sampling Long-Term Monitoring - IA sampling may not be required for subsurface depressurization systems System Termination Sampling - indoor air and sub-slab soil gas sampling required

Institutional Controls Remedial actions (or IRMs) implemented: official i notification of property owner/occupants institutional controls not required Undeveloped Parcels: official notification of property owner/occupants institutional controls required at closure Use of nonresidential screening levels or site specific building parameters: agreement with property owner and institutional control as part of RAW submission

Community Outreach With VI, Communicating with public officials, health officers, residents, property owners, and media is critical Community Outreach Approach: Scheduling indoor sampling events Reporting sample results in a timely manner Organizing public meetings (various formats) Responding to public questions and concerns

New Low Level Air Analysis Method Certification process underway for Method NJDEP- LLTO-15-3/2007 Implications: lower reporting limits (0.2 ppbv) achievable for a majority of the chemicals adding approximately three chemical parameters anticipated implementation in Summer 2008 With the new method in place, USEPA Method TO-15 will no longer be acceptable for soil gas, indoor or ambient air samples.

UPDATE: Reporting Units for Air / Soil ilgas Results Starting with the issuance of the new updated tables this summer 2008, the Indoor Air and Soil Gas Screening Levels will only be provided in units of µg/m 3. IASL and SGSL will no longer be given in units of ppbv. As of this summer 2008, all soil gas, indoor and ambient air results must be reported in units of µg/m 3 only for all documents submitted to the NJDEP.

CLARIFICATION: General VI Investigative Procedures VIG Recommended Approach: Ground Water Soil Gas Indoor Air Consultant s WRONG Interpretation: Ground Near Sub-Slab Indoor Water Slab Soil Soil Gas Air Gas

CLARIFICATION: Indoor Air Sampling in Known Worst Case Environments The NJDEP generally does NOT recommend collecting indoor air samples in structures where it is reasonable to assume extremely high indoor air contaminant levels exist Alternative sample media (GW, Sub-slab soil gas) can be collected to assess the VI pathway Examples: dry cleaners, gas station convenience stores

CLARIFICATIONS: Use of Distance Criterion for VI Assessments Distance Criteria Petroleum hydrocarbons Free product and all other dissolved compounds 30 feet 100 feet The distance criteria are applied to the edge of the groundwater plume in determining which structures should be investigated. It is NOT acceptable to collect a GW sample at a distance less than the prescribed criteria and assume that no contamination at that distance implies the VI pathway is incomplete.

NJDEP Current Policy NJDEP Vapor Intrusion Web Site www.nj.gov/dep/srp/guidance/vaporintrusion/ Currently contains links to: NJDEP Vapor Intrusion Guidance (October 2005) Rutgers University VI Seminar slides Updated Screening Level Tables NJDEP Certified Laboratories - EPA Method TO-15 & TO-17 NJDEP Modified J&E Model Spreadsheet NJDEP Regulatory Reporting Format and Electronic Deliverables Requirements Method TO-15 Units Conversion Table (Excel format or zip file)

Questions john.boyer@dep.state.nj.us t j (609) 984-9751