Drinking Water Production Using Moving Bed Filtration

Similar documents
How Far Can You Push Your Filters? Optimization Lessons

Rawal Lake Water Treatment Plant Rawalpindi, Pakistan

FILTRATION INDUSTRY -An Overview

CE 370. Filtration. Overview of the Process Location in the Treatment Plant

J.K. ENGINEERING LTD. CONSULTING * RESEARCH * DEVELOPMENT

Tampa Bay Water (TBW) is a regional

AS-H Iso-Disc Cloth Media Filter

Chembarambakkam Water Treatment Plant Chennai, India

SOFI FILTER Self-cleaning microfilter from 1 µm

Renovation of the Filters at the Soldier Canyon Filter Plant in Fort Collins, Colorado

Removal of turbidity from water by dissolved air flotation and conventional sedimentation systems using poly aluminum chloride as coagulant

Agenda. Pretreatment Background Typical Contaminants Practical Examples Methods of Treatment and References

STREAMING CURRENT MONITOR FOR COAGULANT OPTIMIZATION IN WATER TREATMENT PLANTS - LAP EXPERIENCE

OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE : OPTIMISATION OF A NEW PACKAGE WATER TREATMENT PLANT. Melina Entwistle. North East Water Authority

Bypass filtration in cooling water systems

Keywords nanofiltration; capillary membrane; direct treatment; backflush; surface water.

Design of a Filtration System for a Small Scale Water Treatment Plant for a Rural Community around Maiduguri Area in Borno State, Nigeria

EVALUATION OF A WATER TREATMENT PLANT PERFORMANCE CASE STUDY

W O C H H O L Z R E G I O N A L W A T E R R E C L A M A T I O N F A C I L I T Y O V E R V I E W

Lowering The Total Cost Of Operation

Jungzhina Water Treatment Plant Thimpu, Bhutan

Examples of sanitary inspection forms

Optimizing the Ballasted Sedimentation Process at the Anacortes Water Treatment Plant Jeff Marrs Plant Manager Greg Pierson - HDR

Hybrid Filtration. Utilizes the Benefits of Continuous and Traditional Filters without any of the Drawbacks

Section 11: Water treatment and related matters

Alternative Filter Media for Potable Water Treatment

Separations Overview TDRL Seminar

Seasonal Source Water Quality and Treatment Challenges Town of Newburgh s Chadwick Lake Filtration Plant

OPTIMISING FILTRATION AT DUNGOG WTP. David Turner. Hunter Water Australia

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

Drinking Water Treatment: Filtration and Disinfection

Evaluation of Conventional Activated Sludge Compared to Membrane Bioreactors

Iron/Manganese Package Plant Pre-Engineered Ground Water Treatment. Village of Bolivar, NY

CGN 6933: Drinking Water Treatment Processes Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of South Florida Cunningham Spring 2013

Zero Discharge for Textile Industry

Purification of Stormwater Using Sand Filter

Your defined goals and objectives:

The Basics: Water supply

Drinking Water Audit Report

Key words: Integrated Membrane System, IMS, Seawater Reverse Osmosis, SWRO, SW30HRLE- 400, Ultrafiltration, UF, ZeeWeed 1000

Development of Integrated Filtration System for Water Treatment and Wastewater Reclamation in Developing Countries

Water Treatment Overview. Gabe Sasser December 2016

New prototype prefilter for seawater RO

Depth Filtration with Microfiber Cloth Enhances Performance of Ultrafiltration as Pretreatment to Seawater Desalination Systems

Unit Treatment Processes in Water and Wastewater Engineering

POTABLE WATER COAGULANT TRIALS UTILIZING POLYALUMINIUM CHLORHYDRATE. Michael Dalton. Toowoomba City Council

LAKESIDE Water Purification Since Bulletin #1218 Revised June Spiravac Clarifier. Peripheral Feed Center Takeoff Suction Sludge Removal

Side Stream Filtration!!

Treatment Processes for Potable Water

Dukso Water Treatment Plant Namyangju City, South Korea

Ultrafiltration Technical Manual

A COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE STUDY OF TWO TYPES OF CLOTH FILTER MEDIA APPLIED IN MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT

OPERATION OF AN STP FOR RECYCLED WATER PRODUCTION PLANT. Iain Fairbairn. Iain Fairbairn, Plant Manager, Sydney Water

ATTACHMENT 1 GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION. BOD5 mg/l mg/l TSS mg/l mg/l NH3-N mg/l mg/l

Lake County WTP Improvements and Capacity Increase. OTCO 9 th Annual Water and Wastewater Workshop. Nick Pizzi Aqua Serv

FAYOUM CITY SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT, DEVELOPMENT STAGES, CASE STUDY

Cloth Media Filter Retrofit Increases Filtration Capacity in Existing Sand Filter Basins of WWTPs in USA

Case Study: Nkunzi Milkyway

AD26 Systems for Iron, Manganese, Sulfide and Arsenic Removal

American Water College 2010

Optimizing Filter Conditions for Improved Manganese Control During Conversion To Biofiltration [Project #4448]

The 2013 University of Oklahoma International WaTER Conference

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HEALTH ASPECTS OF WATER TREATMENT AND SUPPLY Design of Water Treatment Facilities - Katsuyoshi Tomono, Yasumoto Magara

Screw Press Dewatering Optimization. Kelly Brown, BDP Industries, Inc.

Granular Activated Carbon System

OLTRE CAP V- SERIES OUTSIDE IN AIR SCOUR ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES

UV DISINFECTION OF LOW TRANSMITTANCE PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER

Drinking Water Audit Report

WWETCO FlexFilter and Bio-FlexFilter

Removal of Manganese by Microfiltration in a Water Treatment Plant*

BIOLOGICAL FILTRATION FOR SUSTAINABLE TREATMENT OF GROUNDWATER WITH HIGH IRON AND MANGANESE CONTENT A CASE STUDY FROM OVERSTRAND MUNICIPALITY

Membrane Systems. Featuring Aqua MultiBore Membranes

INFLUENCE OF EFFECTIVE SIZE AND LEVEL OF SUPERNATANT LAYER IN SLOW SAND FILTER PERFORMANCE

Hybrid RO & Softening Birjand Water Treatment Plant

Slow Sand Filters. Rapid Sand vs. Slow Sand Filtration. Maintaining a Slow Sand Filter

Water Treatment Math

Kirill Ukhanov, GE Water & Process Technologies, Russia, describes how advanced membrane technology is helping a Russian refinery to meet stringent

Liquid Stream Fundamentals: Grit Removal

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL UF-6-HF ULTRAFILTRATION SYSTEM

Education on Common Household Sewage Treatment Systems Found In Allen County, OH

OVERCOMING CHLORAMINATION OPERATIONAL PROBLEMS AT WILLOW GROVE WATER TREATMENT PLANT. Brendan Holt. Gippsland Water Authority

Proposal by Russia to delete hot sub-spot Hot sub-spot name South-West Wastewater Treatment Plant

Feed Water Reduction in Industrial Water Purification Systems

Your Clear Choice for Filtration and Water &Wastewater Treatment equipment

Boss Water Systems Australia Reverse Osmosis System Model 021-4P-GM

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

REMOVAL OF TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS AND TURBIDITY BY ACTIFLO PROCESS USING MICROSAND

Guide to Inclined Plate Settlers

Water Treatment & Purification Chemicals

DE Ferro Natural Water Treatment

A Mobile And Portable Water Treatment Plant For Small Town Water Supplies *

Chapter 6 Cost Estimation

Side by Side Piloting of Process Alternatives Yields Direct Performance Comparison

WEFTEC.06. **Cobb County Water System, Marietta, Georgia

Technical White Paper

Reclamation of Sand Filter Backwash Effluent using HYDRAcap LD Capillary UF Membrane Technology

How are My Filters Doing? Filter Profiling Reveals All

New Horizons for Slow Sand Filtration. Dr. David H. Manz, P. Eng.

The Fyne Process. Nanofiltration & Ultrafiltration Case Study. Parital view of Wester Ross, Scotland. Home to one of our Fyne Process sites.

Transcription:

Drinking Water Production Using Moving Bed Filtration Small to medium sized package units for surface water treatment Author: J.W. Wouters KEY WORDS Surface water; moving bed filtration; drinking water INTRODUCTION Small to medium sized drinking water plants in the South East Asian area are normally located in rural areas to produce drinking water for small communities. Although properly designed some of these plants lack operators attention and will therefore under perform. It is therefore vital to design a plant which is economic and at the same time suitable to operate with low operators attention and maintenance requirements. This paper is dealing with the features of moving bed filtration which has been successfully applied for both ground water and surface water sources as the core component in drinking water production schemes. Based upon installed reference plants the operating envelope will be discussed and the overall process schemes, including intake facilities will be presented. MBF Features The moving bed filtration process is a treatment process developed as an alternative for conventional rapid sand filters (RSF). The particular features allows MBF to be used as an alternative for a broader range of processes: flocculation settling RSF. Therefore it is essential to understand the specific features of the MBF process. In the MBF, the water to be treated flows in an upward direction through the sand bed (typical filtration rates: 5 12 m/h). During the upward filtration process impurities are retained within the pores of the filter bed. The filtrate free from solids - is discharged in the upper part of the filter via a fixed overflow weir. Simultaneously the filter bed is constantly moving downward (typically with velocities of 0.3 0.8 m/h), as it is sucked into the airlift at the center bottom of the filter. The suction of sand and retained solids is induced by the airlift principle: feeding a small amount of compressed air into the airlift pipe starts the suction process, forcing a mixture of dirty sand and water upward through a central pipeline.

feed filtrate washwater Figure 1: MBF operation The intensive scouring movements separate the impurities from the sand particles. At the top of the pipeline the sand grains are released in the washer section and start to settle in a hydraulic washer. The grains are finally washed by a small amount of clean filtrate, flowing through the washer counter currently. This particular flow is generated by a constant difference in discharge levels of the filtrate and the wash water overflow weirs. High Load Capacity Due to the very nature of the continuous filtration and washing process a constant balance is reached between the feed solids entering the filter and the solids discharged from the filter with the wash water outlet. Other than in RSF processes no accumulation of solids in the filter is occurring and the head loss over the filter is constant at fixed operation conditions. In a RSF a high solids load results in short filter runs. This is the case if the feed water contains voluminous flocs (for instance after dosing a flocculant) and/or a high suspended solids content. Due to the continuous mode of operation a MBF can handle a high load without the drawback of short filter runs. This makes the process favourable if high turbid water sources are to be treated. Washing Efficiency In the MBF each sand grain will eventually be sucked into the airlift and washed properly. Dead zones with poor washing capacities are not existing due to the structure of the filter. Therefore the full filter area will contribute to the filtration process and maximum efficiency is reached. In RSF however the nozzle floor which is used for backwashing is prone to clogging and this will result in poorer backwashing efficiencies in part of the filter area. After a while this will decrease the overall run time and filter performance of the RSF.

The MBF is continuously washed without human interference. This will prevent the operators from extending filter runtimes, causing filter clogging and mud ball formation. Finally the continuous washing principle and washing the sand with a small amount of filtrate does not require additional facilities for clean and dirty wash water storage tanks and backwash water pumps. Feed Screening An essential feature in MBF is the homogeneous sand circulation over the full filter area. Therefore it is essential for the sand to be sucked into the airlift evenly from all directions. The filter internals are therefore constructed into the filter tank perfectly in the centre of the tank. Moreover to prevent any disruptions in the sand suction process it is important that particles > 6 mm are not fed into the filter, as they might cause these kind of problems. A proper feed screen is therefore recommended under all circumstances. An example of such a feed screen is given in the figure. Figure 2: Surface water: 6 mm pre screening Filter Control Due to the continuous sand circulation the filtration process has become timeindependent. With a constant feed water quality the filtrate quality will also be constant in time. The sand circulation rate affects the filtration efficiency. The lower the circulation rate, the better the efficiency. A lower circulation rate implies the retention time of every sand grain in the filter bed is higher, causing a deeper penetration of impurities in the bed. As a result the filling degree of the pores will be higher, increasing filter efficiency. It will be clear that the applied circulation rate must not be lower than the clogging front movement: if the upward clogging front movement is higher than the downward sand movement, breakthrough will occur. If the applied circulation rate is too low and

Chlorophyl-a (µg/l) an equilibrium between the supply and discharge of impurities is not achieved, the filter bed resistance will not become stable and starts to increase. In the MBF the sand circulation rate is an extra control parameter, which may be used to optimise the filtration efficiency: the actual filter load is linked to the actual sand circulation rate in order to establish optimised filter efficiencies under all operating conditions. Varying the air supply to the airlift will guarantee the MBF to be operated in the optimal efficiency range. Surface Water Treatment For surface water treatment the solids loading to the filter is based upon variable feed water quality, as the river water quality may vary considerably with respect to turbidity, colour and suspended solids. The MBF is capable of handling higher solids loadings and may therefore be used as a single process step avoiding the need for pre-treatment by settling. In order to efficiently remove colloidal matter an in line dosing of flocculants is normally projected. An indicative process selection diagram, related to feed turbidity and feed organic material (expressed in chlorophyll-a) is given in figure 3. Figure 4 is a photograph of one of the reference plants in Brasil, figure 5 a typical process flow diagram for the set-up. The final filtrate may be disinfected by using UV or chlorine. 50 DAF 25 10 Enhanced direct continuous filtration DAF or settling Settling 20 40 60 80 100 Figure 3: Surface water process selection diagram Raw water turbidity (NTU)

Figure 4: MBF for surface water treatment for drinking water production in Brasil Figure 5: Surface water treatment MBF process scheme and typical feed/filtrate operating window Table 1 illustrates typical results of a surface water treatment scheme, based upon direct filtration. The effluent criteria are consistently met by the MBF filtrate. The plant has a design capacity of 160 m 3 /h; a flocculant is dosed in-line, using alum. Typical dosages are in the range of 2-6 mg/l Al. The alum dosage is controlled in function of feed turbidity.

Table 1: Surface water treatment plant with MBF direct filtration - Water quality data Parameter Raw Water Filtrate Criteria Turbidity (NTU) 20-25 0.1-0.2 < 0.5 TSS (mg/l) 1-50 0,5 <1 Temperature ( o C) 1-25 Transmission (%) 30-50 > 96 Fe (mg/l) < 0.05 Al (mg/l) 0.05-0.60 < 0.1 < 0.1 Mn (mg/l) < 0.05 CONCLUSIONS The use of MBF technology has proved to be reliable and effective for both ground water treatment and surface water treatment schemes for drinking water production. The simplicity of the process allows uninterrupted production capacity and very limited operators attendance. Due to the nature of the process with a continuous balance between feed solids and wash water solids, the process is suitably operated over a wide range of feed water qualities. The introduction of the enhanced filter control allows a constant high quality filtrate to be generated. As a result the MBF process is effectively applied in drinking water production schemes for small and medium sized communities. CONTACT Hans Wouters BW Products BV email: h.wouters@bwproducts.nl website: www.bwproducts.nl