(aq) + 5e - Mn 2+ (aq) + 4H 2

Similar documents
LAD B3 (pg! 1 of 6! ) Analysis by Redox Titration Name Per

An Oxidation-Reduction Titration: The Reaction of Fe 2+ and Ce 4+

EXPERIMENT 5. The Periodic Table INTRODUCTION

Salinity in Seawater

Oxidation reduction reaction

EXPERIMENT. The Reaction of Magnesium with Hydrochloric Acid; The Molar Volume of Hydrogen

Copper Odyssey. Chemical Reactions of Copper

Experiment 2: The Chromatography of Organic Compounds

Experiment 3: The Chromatography of Organic Compounds

Analysis of Calcium Carbonate Tablets

Determine whether the metal is magnesium, iron, or zinc based on the value of the calculated molar mass.

Measuring Manganese Concentration Using Spectrophotometry

Gravimetric Analysis: Determination of % Sulfur in Fertilizer

Chem 2115 Experiment #9. Consumer Chemistry: Determining the Iron Content in Supplements

CONSERVATION OF MATTER AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES

Experiment. Molar Mass of an Unknown Sulfate Salt by Gravimetric Techniques 1

Greenhouse Effect and Global Warming Environmental Science Student Laboratory Kit

INTRODUCTION TO ELECTROCHEMISTRY: CURRENT, VOLTAGE, & BATTERIES. Introduction. Electrochemistry Revised 4/28/14

Partner: Cathy 22 March Separation and Qualitative Determination of Cations and Anions

3. Add 0.4 ml of. 7. Use a TenSette

SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC DETERMINATION OF IRON

TYPES OF CHEMICAL REACTIONS PART I INTRODUCTION

Luster-On Products. Technical Data Sheet LUSTER-FOS 2900 CALCIUM MODIFIED, FINE GRAINED ZINC PHOSPHATE

CHEM 1215 LAB NOTES EXPT #2: PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHANGES 1

GRAVIMETRIC DETERMINATION OF SULFATE IN AN UNKNOWN SOLUTION

Experiment: Preparation of Adipic Acid by Oxidative Cleavage of Cyclohexene

DETERMINATION of the EMPIRICAL FORMULA

Laser EX 50 Product Code: Revised Date: 03/17/2009. Laser EX 50

Pre- Lab Questions: Synthesis and Crystallization of Alum

Rev Experiment 10

Experiment 2: Preparation of the Artificial Sweetener Dulcin

Experiment 1: The Densities of Liquids and Solids (from Masterson & Hurley)

EXPERIMENT 5. Molecular Absorption Spectroscopy: Determination of Iron with 1,10-Phenanthroline

Scope and application: For water, wastewater, seawater, brine solutions, produced waters and hydraulic fracturing waters.

SIDE DISPLAY: Liesegang Reactions (revised)

By Authority Of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Legally Binding Document

Oxygen Demand, Chemical

H N 2. Decolorizing carbon O. O Acetanilide

METHOD #: Approved for NPDES (Issued 1971) Oxygen, Dissolved (Modified Winkler, Full-Bottle Technique) ANALYTE: CAS # O Oxygen

Laser ACB 50 Product Code: Revised Date: 03/17/2009. Laser ACB 50

The Crystal Forest Favorite Holiday Demonstrations

VISCOSITY, INHERENT (One Point)

Skills in Science. Lab equipment. (Always draw 2D) Drawings below are NOT to scale. Beaker - A general purpose container with a pouring lip.

PVA polymer slime. PVA polymer slime

Name Honors Chemistry / /

Mon. Tues. Wed. Thurs. Fri. AM or PM B

Experiment #3. Density and Specific Gravity.

Name Lab Section Date. Sediment Lab

Ti-Pure TITANIUM DIOXIDE. CONCENTRATED ACID SOLUBILITY OF TiO 2 METHOD: T WP

EXTRA CREDIT - EXPERIMENT G ELECTROCHEMISTRY ACTIVITY OF METALS

TESTING THE WATERS HOW GOOD IS THAT BOTTLED WATER AND HOW EFFECTIVE IS YOUR WATER FILTER

MS20 Laboratory: Physical and Biological Factors Affecting Oxygen in Sea Water

Forensics with TI-Nspire Technology

ENVIRO/Etch Replenisher

CH 149: Chemical Principles. Fall KP1019 Module TA Manual

TITANIUM DIOXIDE. SYNONYMS Titania; CI Pigment white 6; CI (1975) No ; INS No. 171 DEFINITION DESCRIPTION FUNCTIONAL USES CHARACTERISTICS

Eutrophication: Too Much of a Good Thing?

SAMPLE LITERATURE Please refer to included weblink for correct version.

To identify and classify various types of chemical reactions.

The determination of copper in brass

Chapter 8. Gravimetric Analysis

Calcium and Magnesium; Chlorophosphonazo Rapid Liquid Method Method to 1000 µg/l Ca and Mg as CaCO 3 (ULR) Pour-Thru Cell

Lab #2 Wafer Cleaning (RCA cleaning)

Experiment 13: Determination of Molecular Weight by Freezing Point Depression

Periodic Trends and the Properties of Elements The Alkaline Earth Metals

Group IV and V Qualitative Analysis

Periodic Trends and the Properties of Elements

Human DNA Alu Amplification by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)* Laboratory Procedure

Activity 5.1.4: Gram Staining

[ Cl ] - [[Mg 2+ ] ] Experiment 7: Oxidation-Reduction Reactions. transfer e -

PORTABLE ph METER PRICE CODE NUMBER MODEL 100

Copper Smelting by an Ancient Method

Method 108C - Determination of Arsenic Content in Ore Samples From Nonferrous Smelters (Molybdenum Blue Photometric Procedure)

solvent diffusion dissolving soluble

Students will predict the net movement of molecules across a semipermeable membrane.

BIOLOGY 163 LABORATORY. RESTRICTION MAPPING OF PLASMID DNA (Revised Fall 2017)

Equation Writing and Predicting Products Chemistry I Acc

Method to 500 µg/l CH 2 O Powder Pillows

Wood Ash Titration: A Greener Titration Experiment

Acid Rain and Its Effect on Surface Water. Evaluation copy. Figure 1: Typical rain ph in United States.

EXPERIMENT 3: Identification of a Substance by Physical Properties

Metal Finishing Products and Service META-MATE ZINCATE 40 "A CONCENTRATED LIQUID ZINCATE FORMULATION FOR THE PRETREATMENT OF ALUMINUM AND ITS ALLOYS"

Quenching of Pyrophoric Materials

Nickel Electroplating

Scibond SL-23 Polymeric Lubrication System for Tube Drawing

Technical Process Bulletin

Preparation of Cyclohexene From Cyclohexanol

edna PROTOCOL SAMPLE COLLECTION Caren Goldberg and Katherine Strickler, Washington State University Revised November 2015

1,10 Phenanthroline Method * (Powder Pillows or AccuVac Ampuls) Using Powder Pillows

DURNI-COAT DNC

LABORATORY 3 SOIL ANALYSIS

Analysis of soda and sulfate white and green liquors

EMPIRICAL FORMULA OF MAGNESIUM OXIDE

EXPERIMENT 15C. Qualitative Analysis Scheme of Main Group and Transition Metal Cations without Hazardous Waste

Fermentation of Sucrose

Determination of the Empirical Formula of Magnesium Oxide

Preparation of copper(ii) sulfate from copper(ii) nitrate

EMPIRICAL FORMULA OF MAGNESIUM OXIDE

Soil Particle Density Protocol

Approved for NPDES (Editorial Revision 1978) Silica, Dissolved (Colorimetric)

Transcription:

EXPERIMENT 20 Titrimetric Determination of Iron INTRODUCTION Potassium permanganate is widely used as an oxidizing agent in titrimetric analysis. In acidic solution, a permanganate ion undergoes reduction to manganese (II) ion as shown in the following equations: 8H + (aq) + MnO 4 - (aq) + 5e - Mn 2+ (aq) + 4H 2 O (l) Since the permanganate ion is violet and the manganese (II) ion is nearly colorless, the endpoint in titrations using potassium permanganate as the titrant can be taken as the first permanent pink color that appears in the solution. This experiment will utilize potassium permanganate to determine the molarity and mass percent of iron (II) ions in an unknown solution containing iron (II) ammonium sulfate hexahydrate, Fe(NH 4 ) 2 (SO 4 ) 2. 6H 2 O. The titration involves the oxidation of iron (II) to iron (III): Fe 2+ (aq) Fe 3+ (aq) + e- The titration is carried out in a sulfuric acid solution to prevent air-oxidation of iron (II). The overall oxidation-reduction reaction between the permanganate ion and the iron (II) ion is: 8H + (aq) + MnO 4 - (aq) + 5Fe 2+ (aq) Mn 2+ (aq) + 5Fe 3+ (aq) + 4H 2 O (l) The volume of the potassium permanganate solution required is noted, and using this volume and the molarity of the potassium permanganate solution, the moles of iron (II) can be calculated. By knowing the volume of the unknown solution used, the molarity of the iron (II) can be calculated. By knowing the mass of the unknown solution used, the mass percent of iron (II) can be calculated. In this experiment you will test both your accuracy and precision. Students with the same unknown sample will compile their data, and you will submit a mean molarity of iron (II) in the unknown. Before calculating the mean molarity of iron (II), a Q-test will be applied to the data to insure that all of the calculated molarities should be included in the calculation of the mean, and Q 95% values are given in the table below. Number of Data Points : 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Q 95% : 0.970 0.829 0.710 0.625 0.568 0.526 0.493 0.466 Your group s mean molarity of iron (II) will then be checked against its accepted value by the instructor, and the agreement between the two will demonstrate your group s accuracy. Once the mean is determined, the standard deviation and relative standard deviation can be calculated. The relative standard deviation for the molarity of iron (II) will show the agreement between the multiple trials performed by your group, and will demonstrate your group s precision. 203

PROCEDURE 1. Students will work individually for this experiment. Except for the laboratory handout, remove all books, purses, and such items from the laboratory bench top, and placed them in the storage area by the front door. For laboratory experiments you should be wearing closed-toe shoes. Tie back long hair, and do not wear long, dangling jewelry or clothes with loose and baggy sleeves. Open you lab locker. Put on your safety goggles, your lab coat, and gloves. PART A - CALIBRATING THE BURET 2. Attach a support rod to a stirring plate, and attach a double buret clamp to the support rod. Obtain a buret (tolerance 0.03 ml), always carrying a buret in a vertical position. Attach a double buret clamp to a ring stand attached to a stirring plate. Attach the buret to the double buret clamp. 3. Prepare a buret card to be used every time you read your buret. Obtain a 3"x5" card from drawer 019 and using a black felt tip pen make a horizontal mark on your card, one centimeter thick and practically the length of the card. When the top of the black band is held just below the bottom of a meniscus you will see a reflection of the band in the meniscus against the white of the card behind. This offers you a repeatable method of determining the position of the meniscus. You must make sure during your readings that your line of sight is perpendicular to the buret so as to avoid parallax. If your line of sight is looking downward or looking upward, the meniscus will appear to be higher or lower, respectively, than its true value. 4. Using a funnel, and with the top of the funnel below eye level, fill the buret with deionized water. Run some of the deionized water through the buret tip into the waste beaker until you are sure that all the bubbles are removed from the buret tip. Add enough deionized water so that the water level is above the 0.00 ml mark, then drain the water slowly into the beaker until the meniscus is at the 0.00 ml mark (as read with your buret card). Touch the tip of the buret to the side of a beaker to remove the drop hanging from the tip. After about a minute, to allow for drainage, make an initial reading of the meniscus with your buret card, estimating the volume to the nearest 0.01 ml. Record the calibration reading in your Data Table. Allow the buret to stand for 5 minutes and recheck the reading. If the stopcock is tight, there should be no noticeable change in the reading. If the reading has changed tighten the locking nut on the stopcock and let stand for another 5 minutes. Check the reading again. If the buret continues to leak consult your instructor. 5. Empty the deionized water out of your buret. 204

PART B - DETERMINATION OF IRON (II) 6. Obtain a 10.00-mL pipet (tolerance 0.02 ml), and an unknown solution containing iron (II) ions. Always carry pipets in a vertical position. Do not remove the code label from the unknown solution, but record the unknown number in the space provided in your Data Table. 7. Obtain a pipet bulb from drawer 014 or a pipet roller from drawer 013. Condition your pipet by drawing about 2 ml of the iron (II) solution into the pipet and, holding the pipet in a horizontal position, rolling it to make sure that the iron solution wets the entire inside surface. Drain the iron (II) solution through the pipet tip into the waste beaker. Do not use too much iron (II) solution for the conditioning process, or you may not have enough left for your titrations. Repeat this conditioning procedure two more times, each with about 2 ml of the iron (II) solution. All excess solutions in the waste beaker on your lab bench must be disposed of in the waste bottle in the fume hood. 8. Obtain a stopper from drawer 013. Measure the mass of a clean, dry, stoppered 125-mL Erlenmeyer flask and record it in the Data Table. Pipet a 10.00 ml sample of the iron (II) solution into the flask, and record this volume in your Data Table. Measure the mass of the stoppered flask with the added sample of the iron (II) solution and record it in the Data Table. Calculate the mass of the sample and record it in the Data Table. Add about 5 ml of 6 M sulfuric acid to the flask. 9. Obtain 75 ml of the standardized potassium permanganate solution from the large container in the lab room. Read the container and record the concentration of the potassium permanganate solution in your Data Table. Condition your buret by rinsing it three times with 5 ml portions of the potassium permanganate solution. Drain the potassium permanganate solution through the buret tip into a waste beaker. Place all excess solutions in the waste beaker on your lab bench. Dispose of all excess solutions in the waste bottle in the Fume Hood A. Using a funnel, and with the top of the funnel below eye level, fill the buret with the potassium permanganate solution. Run some of the potassium permanganate solution through the buret tip into a waste beaker until (1) you are sure that all the bubbles are removed from the buret tip, and (2) the potassium permanganate meniscus is at or below the 0.00 ml mark on the buret. Remove the last drop from the tip of the buret, then remove the waste beaker 10. Obtain a clean and dry magnetic stirring bar from your locker, and carefully slide it into the Erlenmeyer flask containing the unknown iron (II) solution. Center the Erlenmeyer flask on the stirring plate, and adjust your buret so the tip is slightly inside the mouth of the flask. Read the buret and record it as the Initial Buret Reading. Have another student verify the reading. Turn on the stirring plate, slowly increasing the speed until that the stirring bar creates a vortex in the liquid, but does not collide with the sides of the vessel. 11. Add the potassium permanganate solution intermittently from the buret to the Erlenmeyer flask, noting the pink permanganate color that appears and disappears as the drops hit the liquid and mix with it. When the pink color begins to persist, slow down the rate of the addition of potassium permanganate until you are adding it drop by drop. In the final stages of the titration, rinse the inside wall of the flask with deionized water from your wash bottle, and add half drops until the entire solution just turns a pale pink, or salmon, color. If your solution turned from colorless to pale pink with the addition of only one drop of the potassium permanganate solution, use this titration to determine the molarity of iron (II) in the unknown solution. However, if your solution turned from colorless to pink with the addition of more than one drop of the potassium permanganate solution, this would be a gross error that caused the endpoint to be missed, and this titration should be discarded. 205

12. Read the buret and record it as the Final Buret Reading. Have another student verify the reading. Pour the contents of the Erlenmeyer flask through your funnel into the waste beaker to recover the magnetic stirring bar, then clean and dry it for the next titration. Refill the buret with potassium permanganate solution, repeat step 8, and do a second trial, titrating to a pale pink endpoint. 13. Complete two titrations in which you obtain a pale pink endpoint. Calculate the mass percent of iron (II) and the molarity of iron (II) for both trials. Precise work will give you two mass percents and two molarities that are nearly identical. The expected precision limit for volumetric analysis is 1%. For your individual work this means that your two mass percents and your two molarities should agree within 1% of each other. 14. Find your unknown number on the white board, and write your two calculated molarities of iron (II) underneath it. Record all of the calculated molarities for your unknown in your Data Table. List the molarities from lowest to highest, then apply a Q-Test to the highest and lowest molarities to determine if one of them should be rejected because it is an outlier. 15. The statistical analysis can be done on a TI-30 calculator. Clear the calculator by pressing. If Error appears, press. Enter the first molarity, then press. Enter the second molarity, press, and continue this until all of the non-rejected molarities have been entered. At this point you will see n = x, where x is the number of data points you have entered. To find the mean of the entered data, press, and you will see the mean displayed. To find the standard deviation, press, and you will see the standard deviation displayed. You will need to calculate the relative standard deviation on your own. Record each of these calculated values in your Data Table. Precise work will give multiple molarities that are nearly identical. The expected precision limit for volumetric analysis is less than 1%. For your group this means that the mean molarity of iron (II) should have a relative standard deviation of less than 1%. Accurate work will give you a mean molarity that is nearly identical with the accepted molarity. The expected accuracy limit for volumetric analysis is less than 1%. For your group this means that the mean molarity of iron (II) should agree within 1% of the accepted molarity of iron (II) when graded by the instructor. 16. At the end of the experiment, clean and dry the magnetic stirring bar and return it to your lab locker. Empty the permanganate solution out of your buret, then rinse the buret thoroughly, including the tip, with your remaining unknown. Dispose of this waste solution in the waste bottle in the Fume Hood A. Next, rinse the buret several times with tap water, then three times with deionized water, disposing of these washings down the sink, and then dry off the outside. Rinse your unknown container several times with tap water, then three times with deionized water, and then dry off the outside. Return these items to the back of the lab room. 17. Clean and wipe dry your laboratory work area and all apparatus. When you have completed your lab report have the instructor inspect your working area. Once your working area has been checked your lab report can then be turned in to the instructor. 206

EXPERIMENT 20 LAB REPORT Name: Student Lab Score: Date/Lab Start Time: Lab Station Number: DATA TABLE TRIAL 1 TRIAL 2 TRIAL 3 Calibration Buret Reading. ml Unknown Code Number Mass of Stopper, Flask... g Volume of Sample... ml Mass of Stopper, Flask, Sample... g 1-3 Mass of Sample... g Concentration of KMnO 4... M Concentration of MnO 4 -... M Initial Buret Reading... ml Final Buret Reading... ml 4-6 Volume of KMnO 4 Used... ml 7-9 Mass % Iron (II) in Sample... % 10-12 Concentration of Iron (II)... M Concentration from 2 nd Experimentor.. M Concentration from 3 rd Experimentor.. M Concentration from 4 th Experimentor.. M 13 Mean Concentration of Iron (II). M Standard Deviation. M 14 Relative Standard Deviation. % 207

CALCULATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 208

8. 9. 209

10. 11. 210

12. 13. (Q-test) 14. 211

QUESTIONS 1. If today s first titration required only 15 ml of the standard KMnO 4 solution to neutralize the unknown iron (II) solution, what procedural change could be made to insure that subsequent titrations used at least 20 ml of the standard KMnO 4 solution? 2. When cleaning the pipet, if the pipet is rinsed with water but then is not rinsed several times with the iron (II) solution before being used to transfer the iron (II) solution into the 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask, is the calculated molarity of iron (II) in the unknown greater or less than the actual molarity of iron (II) in the unknown? Explain based upon your calculation in Box 10. 212

3. A water supply was known to contain lead (II) ions. A 100.0 ml aliquot of the solution was pipetted, and its mass determined to be 100.53 g. The 100.0 ml aliquot was acidified, and 21.25 ml of a 0.01235 M potassium dichromate solution were required to oxidize all of the lead (II) ions. Calculate (1) the molarity of the lead (II) ions in the solution, and (2) the mass percent of the lead (II) ions in the solution. 213

4. A person s blood alcohol (C 2 H 5 OH) content can be determined by titrating a sample of blood plasma with potassium permanganate solution. A 6.978 g sample of blood plasma from a suspected drunk driver was titrated, and 28.35 ml of an acidified 0.01061 M potassium permanganate solution were required to convert all of the alcohol into carbon dioxide. Calculate the mass percent of alcohol in the blood, and determine if the driver was legally intoxicated. 214