Metro Transit Potential Rider Study Prepared by:

Similar documents
Metro s Guide to Accessibility and Independence

General Population Survey Summary

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

FUTURE BUS RAPID TRANSIT PLANS

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY. Nevin Grinnell Marketing January 10, 2012

Calgary Transportation Plan. Adopted by Council September calgary.ca call 3-1-1

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

PROTECTING Our Quality of Life... Why the Capital Region Needs to Invest in Mass Transit NOW

Calgary Transit Annual Customer Satisfaction Survey

BC Transit Customer Satisfaction Survey Results. Prepared by TransPro Consulting July

Fairfax County Countywide Transit Network Study

Paradox between public transport and private car as a modal choice in policy formulation

Los Angeles County Congestion Reduction Demonstration Project

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY: 2016 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION STUDY

Transportation Economics and Decision Making. L e c t u r e - 8

This page intentionally left blank.

March 2017 USING PRESTO ON GO TRANSIT

Sustainability. Sustainability Principles. 1. Framework. Spokane Transit s definition of Sustainability is:

Amman Transportation Strategy

2018 TRAVEL TRENDS, ATTITUDES AND USAGE WEX

Transportation Report to SPC on Transportation and Transit 2017 March 15. ISC: UNRESTRICTED TT Page 1 of 7 ROUTEAHEAD UPDATE

Climate Vulnerability Assessment Localized Flood Risk

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. What is the RCTP?

Integrating Frequent Transit Service & Corridor-based Transit Supportive Environments in the Metro Vancouver Region. July 2009

1.201 / / ESD.210 Transportation Systems Analysis: Demand and Economics. Assignment 2

Biennial user and non user survey FINAL REPORT

Does Gen Y want the keys to the car? The changing nature of mobility

"The Responsible Traveller"

CHAPTER 1 COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION BASIC INFORMATION

CTECIntelligence. America s Biggest Employer. Voters believe that technology is the industry that will create the most jobs over the next 10 years

CTA Transit Operations & Technology Management Divisions

I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Capital Beltway in Northern Virginia, USA

Jackson County. HopOn. RideOn. We ll Get You There! Commuter Services Community Transportation Carpooling/Vanpooling

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

Beyond Fare Collection: Next Stop, Multimodal Payments. Michael Dinning U.S. Department of Transportation Volpe Center Cambridge, Massachusetts

GO RAIL NIAGARA SERVICE EXTENSION

INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL MARKETING AND SEGMENTATION

Using the Three-Factor Method to Identify Improvement Priorities for Express and Local Bus Services in the Twin Cities

2016 Kelowna Regional Transit Customer Satisfaction Survey Project Update

Learn more about the many ways The Swift is eco-friendly throughout our building and surrounding area and how you can do your part!

LESSON 3: Prescribe a Pollution Diet

How. Gen. Driving Financial Industry. Change MARKETING SERVICES

Fare Collection 101: Fare Policy

DART s Role in Transit - Oriented Development. Jack Wierzenski,, Director Economic Development & Planning Dallas Area Rapid Transit

Transportation Concurrency

UNION PEARSON EXPRESS UNION STATION PLATFORM AND WAITING LOUNGE CANADIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERING AWARDS Photo credit: Tom Arban Photography

Safety and Service Delivery Committee. Action Item III-A. January 11, 2018

Transit Service Guidelines

Long-Range Plan Task Force: Draft Analysis Results

TravelSmart: Planning for Sustainable Urban Transportation

The Retail Customer Experience Which elements of the shopping experience matter most?

What Business Are You Really In?

Arriva for your whole journey

Moscow Transport in the Smart City: Current Status and Development Plans

Caltrain Fare Study Update

Use of ITS Data in Transit Planning and Management at Metro Transit (Minneapolis / Saint Paul) John Levin Director of Strategic Initiatives

TRANSPORTATION FACTS. OUR CUSTOMERS: Travel Patterns

Input from Engineers Ireland Into the Department of Transport s Statement of Strategy

Calgary Transit Park and Ride Guiding Principles for Future Improvements

SMART HIGHWAYS & TUNNELS

downtown business association Investigating the Impact of The City Centre Airport Redevelopment on Downtown Edmonton Executive Summary

2015/16 Public Transport Passenger Satisfaction Survey

SUBJECT: Update on Parking and Transportation Task Force recommended winter parking program

CAPITAL AREA TRANSIT PLANNING SERVICE STANDARDS AND PROCESS. Planning Department

Transform 66 Multimodal Project: Prioritization Process and Evaluation Criteria Approved March 3, 2016

Subject 2015 MiWay Customer Satisfaction Survey Results. Recommendation

Towards Collaborative Mobility: Elastic Transport Infrastructure & Research Challenges

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

The Next Next Generation Customer Information System

Consumer Travel Insights by STR. Perceptions of Destinations

store for Buckshaw Village and Euxton

BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT)

BRIEF OBSERVATION OF TRANSANTIAGO DE CHILE

ACCENTURE RESEARCH. TRAVEL FLASH RESEARCH CHINA INSIGHTS February, 2018

HABITAT - III Workshop; CNAM/CODATU. The Accessibility We Need Closing Session Brief on the Draft of CODATU Message to HABITAT - III

INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT Enhancing personal mobility for all travelers

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Response to the State-Mandated Performance Audit, January 12, 2017

CALGARY TRANSIT. Customer Satisfaction Survey 2013 O CTOBER HarGroup M anagement Consultants

City of La Habra Heights Dial-A-Ride

LAND USE POLICIES BY COMMUNITY DESIGNATION

ON-TRIP TRAVELLER INFORMATION USING VMS - INCIDENT DETECTION AND VMS AT KÖLN - ZOO BRIDGE EUROSCOPE

Introduction to Transportation Systems

HEALTH & WELLNESS 2015

Effective Transportation Demand Management (TDM) in Congested Corridors US 422 TDM Best Practices Policy Brief and Recommendations

Diversity and Inclusion. Executive Summary

VEHICLES MILES TRAVELED (VMT) TRAFFIC IMPACT METRIC

Lethbridge Transit Master Plan. Final Report Presentation July 17, 2017

Peter Klitz Senior Planner Transit Network Management TransLink (Metro Vancouver)

EDMONTON S TRANSIT STRATEGY

Management and Integration of Data and Modeling at Santa Clara County Congestion Management Agency

SUSTAINABILITY. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. Office of Planning Sustainability Sustainability

...to DO MORE. Finding a way to move

Building Brand Community on the Harley-Davidson Posse Ride M740 CORPORATE REPUTATION AND BRAND MANAGEMENT

NSB CoRe WP 3: Transport services benchmarking Best practices from North Sea Baltic Commuting Corridors

Bus Information Strategy

Future System Planning (ST4)

Mobility Pricing Conference: Perspectives on Transit, Equity, and Fare Policy / Setting. Brendon Hemily, PhD

SOUTHEAST FLORIDA REGIONAL COMPACT CLIMATE CHANGE. Sustainable Communities & Transportation Planning

Transcription:

Metro Transit Potential Rider Study Prepared by:, Inc. Presented by: Bruce Howard, Director of Customer Services and Marketing Metro Transit

Project Goal Identify the size and understand more fully the overall potential rider market and key sub-segments of the potential rider market in the Greater Minneapolis/St. Paul MSA. 2

Identifying the Potential Rider Market 3

From the broadest and most optimistic perspective, how many people make up Metro Transit s Potential Rider Market? 4

Using Marketing Filters to Identify the Potential Transit Rider Market Adults 18+ who live in the area Must be a regular traveler Do not ride Metro Transit regularly now Are currently an SOV driver (we are not interested in breaking up a carpool) Would consider riding transit in the future The Potential Transit Rider 5

Metro Transit s Potential Rider Market 611,740 Do Not Use MT in a Typical Week = 100,000 people 611,740 Potential Riders Make Up Metro Transit s Potential Rider Market. Approximately 28% of the Metro area adult population 18+. (In this study a sample size of 1,069) 6

Key Insights Into Converting Potential Riders 7

1 Many Potential Riders have had past experience with Metro Transit and have been satisfied with their experiences. 8

Metro Transit options shown in order of awareness. Few Potential Riders Who Have Used Metro Transit Services Have Been Dissatisfied Metro Transit Bus 8% 38% 54% METRO Blue Line LRT 2% 33% 65% n = 1,069 Those aware: MT Bus: 1003 METRO BL: 792 Northstar: 741 METRO RL: 254 9 Northstar Commuter Line METRO Red Line BRT 15% 1% 14% 1% 84% 85% 0% 50% 100% Used/Satisfied Used/Not satisfied Not used but aware Q9. Below is a list of transportation options offered by Metro Transit. Which of the following best describes your experience with each?

* Defined as rating a 4 or 5 on S4: On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being Definitely would not consider and 5 being Definitely would consider, how likely are you to consider increasing your use of Metro Transit public transportation in the future? n = 1,069 Potential Riders n = 416 Likely Future Transit Use 10 Potential Riders Considering Future Transit Use Are Most Likely to Use Light Rail METRO Blue Line LRT METRO Green Line LRT Metro Transit Bus Northstar commuter rail METRO Red Line BRT 15% 17% Q11. For all Metro Transit options familiar, On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being Very Unlikely and 5 being Very Likely, how likely are you to use the following Metro Transit options in the future?. 32% 40% 45% Among potential riders who indicate they would consider using Metro Transit in the future, 32% are likely to use MT bus. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Recommendation Recognize and celebrate the positive association public transportation, as a service concept, has in the Minneapolis / St. Paul market. You do not have to overcome the old transit dependent service label. 11

2 There are several barriers to greater consideration and trial of transit. 12

Comparatively, only 18% of those who live within 5 blocks of a stop consider that their residence is not convenient. Note that barriers are similar across all potential rider segments, generational and current use behavior. Many Potential Riders Do Not Take Transit Due to Need for Freedom and Convenience Prefer the freedom of driving Residence not convenient Takes longer than other modes Schedules do not fit my schedule Lack of regular job schedule I live too far away Don t care to take transit Lack of regular/fixed job location Don t have enough information Don t feel safe Bus or train is unreliable Costs more 4% 1% 12% 12% 11% 15% 21% 21% 37% 34% 38% 52% The one main reason for not taking public transit more : Prefer the freedom of driving 23% Residence is not convenient 17% Public transit takes longer 14% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% n = 1,069 13 Q25. What reasons, if any, do you have for not taking public transit more often? Please select all that apply. Q26. Note: Show all reasons selected in Q25, What is your one main reason for not taking public transit more often?

Recommendation Express the benefits of transit in a manner that reinforces freedom of mobility goes everywhere you want to go (convenient, fits personal schedules, etc.). 14

3 There are several motivators that could increase consideration and trial of public transportation. 15

Note: Rating was on a 1 to 5 scale, where: 1 = Would Not Motivate Me At All 5 = Would Definitely Motivate Me Responses 4 + 5 reported Potential Riders Are Motivated by Opportunities That Would Expedite Public Transit Travel Stop closer to home Discounted pass More frequent service 29% 35% 29% 21% 16% 14% 49% 45% 50% 4 5 - Would Definitely Motivate Me Note that motivators are similar across all potential rider segments, generational and current use behavior. Guaranteed arrival times Bypass lane routes Real-time information Expanded operation hours 27% 31% 26% 23% 14% 41% 9% 40% 11% 37% 13% 36% Continued on next slide 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% n = 1,069 16 Q28. Which of the following would motivate you to ride public transit more often?.

Note: Rating was on a 1 to 5 scale, where: 1 = Would Not Motivate Me At All 5 = Would Definitely Motivate Me Responses 4 + 5 reported On Average, Potential Riders Consider Five or More Potential Offerings to be Motivation to Ride Public Transit More Often Free transit pass for a week Parking/Transit option pass Free WiFi 22% 13% 35% 23% 12% 35% 23% 12% 35% 4 5 - Would Definitely Motivate Me Emergency ride home 21% 13% 34% Online trip planner 20% 10% 30% High frequency routes Bike rack capacity 18% 7% 25% 6% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Continued from previous slide n = 1,069 17 Q28. Which of the following would motivate you to ride public transit more often?.

Recommendation There is no one silver bullet regarding motivating people to use transit services. However, potential riders are most motivated by service improvements and saving money. 18

4 Metro Transit can improve perceptions around its service delivery. 19

Top seven attributes, all receiving Importance ratings of 75% or greater. There Are Significant Gaps in Perceived Performance on all Factors Considered to be Critically Important Reliability 51% 90% Importance Performance Note: Rating was on a 1 to 5 scale, where: Convenience On-time arrival at destination 34% 47% 89% 89% 1 = Not at all Important 5 = Most Important 1 = Poor 5 = Excellent Ease of use Total travel time Safety 42% 31% 44% 88% 84% 76% Affordability 49% 76% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% n = 1,069 20 Q18. When selecting a mode of travel, what considerations are most important? Please rate the importance of each of the following. Q23. Based on your personal experience, or what you may have heard, how would you rate Metro Transit s performance on the following attributes?

Importance Areas of Opportunity Revolve Around Timing and Convenience GROWTH OPPORTUNITY Convenience Total travel time Ease of use BUILD, MAINTAIN & PROMOTE Reliability On-time arrival Safety Affordability Traffic avoidance SAVE RESOURCES Opportunity for social interaction Health benefits Low stress Clean stations RESERVE STRENGTH Saves money Productive commute time Environmentally friendly Performance 21

The Mobility Hierarchy of Needs Tertiary Mobility Needs Aesthetic and Optional The journey is relaxing and fulfills personal desires (e.g. helping the environment) Secondary Mobility Needs Social and Affective Independence, control, be seen as normal Primary Mobility Needs Practical and Utilitarian Get from A to B as safely, reliably, cheaply and comfortably as possible 22 22

Recommendations Messaging should reinforce convenience, reliability, travel time, ease of use, and safety. 23

Potential Rider Sub-Segments Occasional Potential Rider Sub-Segment Highest Potential Rider Sub-Segment Generational Sub-Segments 24

28% of the population equates to 611,740 potential riders. Applying additional filters yields more conservative potential market sizes. Sizing Metro Transit s Market Five Different Ways to Size the Opportunity Market 611,740 Do not use MT in a typical week 1 2 Of the 611,740 464,922 Have used MT in past and satisfied Of the 611,740 318,105 Live w/in 5 Blocks of transit 3 Of the 611,740 269,166 Say they are likely to use MT in future = 100,000 people 25 4 Of the 611,740 226,344 Have used MT in past and satisfied and are likely to use in future 5 Of the 611,740 134,583 Have used MT in past and satisfied, and are likely to use MT in future, and live w/in 5 blocks of transit

611,740 total potential riders in the metro area. Of those, 22%, or 134,583 are categorized as the highest potential future users. 13% are estimated to be occasional riders, and 87% are non riders Sizing Metro Transit s Market High Potential Non-riders 611,740 Do Not Use MT in a Typical Week The following section will focus exclusively on the opportunity market of 134,583 highest potential riders who represent 6% of the metro area adult population 18+. Of the 611,740 464,922 Have Use MT in Past and Satisfied Of the 611,740 318,105 Live w/in 5 Blocks of Transit Sample size is 179. Of the 611,740 269,166 Say They Are Likely to Use MT in Future 26 = 100,000 people Of the 611,740 226,344 Have Used MT in Past and Satisfied and Are Likely to Use in Future Of the 611,740 134,583 Have Used MT in Past and Satisfied, and Are Likely to Use MT in Future, and Live w/in 5 Blocks of Transit

Example of how to read this chart: Millennials account for 34% of the High Potential non- Rider segment. Summary of Rider Use Segments By Generation Potential Non-riders n = 1069 High Potential Non-riders n = 179 Occasional Riders n = 154 Millennials 28% 34% 34% Genx 39% 32% 46% Boomer 22% 26% 12% Silent 11% 8% 8% Total 100% 100% 100% 27

Considerations for Prioritizing Opportunities and Next Steps 1. Basic mobility needs must be addressed before focusing on higher level esoteric needs. 2. Identify and redouble efforts to promote best in class service. 3. Realizing that Millennials are the largest and fastest growing segment of the High Potential non-riders, implement marketing efforts that address their specific barriers and motivators. 4. Distinguish between real and perceived barriers. While real concerns, such as routing, may need to be addressed through actual changes, perceived barriers, such as overall safety on transit, can be addressed through planned media and messaging. 5. Nearly half of metro area adults either use transit today or are open to using it in the future. 28 28

29 Questions?