Forest Legacy Program

Similar documents
Where Funds are Spent

2009 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT for the establishment of the TENNESSEE FARMLAND LEGACY PARTNERSHIP

The USDA. Farm Bill:

Texas forests are. one of our state s most valuable natural resources, with unlimited environmental and economic potential for future generations.

Oregon Spatial Analysis Project

Alameda County Resource Conservation District

NDCEE. Ecosystem Banking Best Practices. Elizabeth Keysar, NDCEE/CTC. National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

Dr. Cynthia West Executive Director Office of Sustainability & Climate Change

Subtitle E Delaware River Basin Conservation

4.3 AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES

LIVING LANDS Helping Land Trusts Conserve Biodiversity

King County Land Use Strategies for Global Warming Preparedness

$5 Million Enviva Forest Conservation Fund Announces 2016 Conservation Grants

Introduction to the Natural Resources Element

NESST- National Ecosystem Services Strategy Team

Making Forestry Work: What Districts Can Do

Natural Resource Management of Pipeline Infrastructure

The Social and Economic Importance of Canada s Privately Owned Forest Lands

Measuring and Valuing Natural Assets: Ecosystem Services. Steve Polasky University of Minnesota & Natural Capital Project

The 2014 Farm Bill. Texas Watershed Coordinators Roundtable Waco, Texas July 31, 2014

Forest Land Exemption Application

4 CONSERVED LANDS, PUBLIC LANDS, AND OTHER RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES

Policy # Section Biodiversity Policy and Program Development

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

NCDA&CS 2012 AGRICULTURAL LANDS ASSESSMENT

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin,

An introduction to incentives for forest-water ecosystem services. Thomas Enters, UNEP

USDA Forest Service Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years

2014 Farm Bill Conference Report Analysis

There are currently 379 active farms in the County. They occupy approximately 63,100.

USDA Forest Service Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit Forest Plan Revision Topics Need for Change

Strategic Direction for Landowner Assistance

Bill 36, the Alberta Land Stewardship Act sets the bar for responsible regional planning

New Jersey Forest Stewardship Program Spatial Analysis Project Map Products And Data Layers Descriptions

Ecosystem Goods and Services: Where are We?

For the property described as: Property Owner: Name. Phone Number. Mailing Address. City. Report Year:

Dienst Landelijk Gebied

Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) Board of Directors. Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) Watershed Knowledge. Watershed Management

Florida's Renewable Forest Resources 1

SECTION 2. SFI Forest Management Standard

8/5/2011. Lesson Overview. Disturbance/Fragmentation. Shifting Mosaic. Number one cause of biodiversity loss. Types of disturbance. - Scale, frequency

Ecosystem Services: Provision, Value & Policy. Steve Polasky University of Minnesota & Natural Capital Project

The following chart may be used to help identify the Common Language Terms/Categories for your project activities:

Ecosystem Services BUCK KLINE AND VIJAY A SATYAL

DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

The Fish River Chain of Lakes Concept Plan

DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED INITIATIVE CASE STUDY

Management of New York City Water Supply Lands: A Component of a Comprehensive Watershed Protection Program

Executive Report. Blackbird-Millington Corridor Conservation Area Plan

FARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions

San Jacinto County Appraisal District PO Box 1170 Coldspring, Texas (Fax)

Conservation District Business Plan Steuben County Soil and Water Conservation District

Frequently Asked Questions about the Cohesive Strategy and the. Northeast Regional Action Plan

State and Private Forestry Fact Sheet

Lake Britton Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat LAKE BRITTON PLANNING UNIT

Land Between The Lakes NRA Job and Income Contributions for 2014 At A Glance

STEWARDSHIP FORUM JUNE STEWARDSHIP INDICATORS WORKSHOP WORKBOOK

Climate Change and Agriculture: How is USDA Helping Agriculture Respond

Draft Environmental Impact Statement. School Trust Land Exchange

BUDGET AND RESOURCES

County of Calaveras Department of Planning

SFI Fiber Sourcing & FSC Controlled Wood: How These Standards Address Uncertified Content in the Supply Chain

FOREST, WETLANDS AND HABITAT

North Carolina Sentinel Landscapes Strategic Plan

Forest Land. Key Income Tax Updates for Forest Owners. Selling Carbon Offset Ranked Top by Woodland Owners. Family and Individual Woodland Owners

Acres 32% 35% Not Suitable. Impervious. Possible UTC. Vegetation. Existing UTC

An Introduction to Markets for Ecosystem Services

Managed Forest Tax Incentive Program Encouraging Responsible Forest Stewardship Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry

Hat Creek Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat. LCP Volume II Supporting Analysis for Recommendations

Minnesota Forests for the Future Conserving Minnesota s working forest lands to meet the state s future recreation, economic, and ecological needs.

MODULE 5: ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS

P ARISH OF EAST B ATON ROUGE, L OUISIANA BREC S TRATEGIC P LAN

Applying Ecosystem Services to Collaborative Forest Management Elk River Public Meeting

Environmental Assessment

Pierce County s Green Y

Appendix A. Agricultural Resource Lands Designation: Selected Washington Counties Fully Planning Under the Growth Management Act

Summary: The Future of Oregon s Agricultural Land

C O M P R E H E N S I V E P R O T E C T I O N & R E S T O R AT I O N P L A N. f or th e

Recommendations for the 2018 Farm Bill Forests in the Farm Bill Coalition

Facts About Texas and U.S. Agriculture

Climate and Agricultural Preservation Plan Action Plan Outline. HLUET Committee August 17, 2017

Virginia Forest Conservation. Forestry Work Group November 2013

Land Use and Conservation Law! The Adirondack Example! Land Use and Conservation Central Questions

Drake University Agricultural Law Center

Government Conservation Programs

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Fort Collins, CO

Texas Land Trends. Texas A&M Institute of Renewable Natural Resources Roel R. Lopez

FOREST FOR THE TREES: LAND-USE ISSUES IN MICHIGAN Marty Mater Teacher Consultant in Residence Michigan Geographic Alliance

Conservation Practices for Water Quality: Sediment & Nutrient Control. Trap Sediments/Trap Nutrients on the Field. Improve Soil Health.

LANDSCAPE SCALE PLANNING: INNOVATIVE TOOLS USED BY MD SHA AND TX DOT

Blanche Park Reservoir Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

Managing Publicly Owned Forest in a Changing Landscape

Adaptive Management of Puget Sound Chinook Salmon and Ecosystems. Stacy Vynne McKinstry Conference on Ecological and Ecosystem Restoration July 2014

Hawaii s s State-wide Assessment of Forest Resource Condition and Long-Term Strategy. Ron Cannarella September 24, 2009

CHAPTER 9 DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Gatineau Park: The Capital s Natural Jewel. Presented by Christie Spence Canadian Institute of Forestry AGM Ottawa, September 28, 2017

March 16, The Honorable Donald J. Trump President of the United States The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W. Washington, DC 20500

Sustaining Minnesota Forest Resources: Voluntary Site-Level Forest Management Guidelines for Landowners, Loggers and Resource Managers

Watershed Forest Management -- Adaptive Management in the Face of Threats

LAND AND USE. Figure 2. Land cover in Rhode Island, Forest land. Nonforest land and smaller forest patches predominate in the area surrounding

Transcription:

Forest Legacy Program Forest Management Sheet Legacy http://texasforestservice.tamu.edu The State of Texas contains 26 million acres of forestland, primarily in the Eastern third of the state. This forestland provides the state with its third most valuable agricultural commodity, creating more than 91,000 jobs with more than $2.3 billion in wages and salaries. In addition, forests in Texas provide nontimber benefits such as clean water, habitats for diverse wildlife, eco-tourism, historical preservation, and carbon sequestration abilities. For these reasons, it is vitally important to protect forestland in Texas. Private non-industrial landowners own approximately 63% of the forestland in Texas, while the forest industry accounts for about 16% of forest ownership in Texas. These landowners face increasing incentives to utilize their land for nonforest purposes due to population growth and a rising demand for non-agriculturally developed land. Because of these pressures, forestland in Texas is becoming increasingly fragmented and thus the benefits of forests are being negated. Therefore, Texas displays a need for a program that fosters a long-term commitment to sustainable forest management. The United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service (USFS) provides just such a program, known as the Forest Legacy Program (FLP). Established in the 1990 Farm Bill, the FLP strives to protect environmentally sensitive forestlands through the acquisition of conservation easements, which are legally binding agreements transferring a negotiated set of property rights from one party to another without removing the property from private ownership. The process of acquiring conservation easements through the FLP is accomplished through interactions of federal, state, and local branches of government as well as nongovernmental organizations. Landowner participation in the program is entirely voluntary, and no land or interest in land will be forcefully sold. The Texas Forest Legacy Program is a cooperative effort between the Texas Forest Service and the USDA Forest Service to protect environmentally important forestlands from conversion to non-forest uses. Working forest easements protect conservation values while allowing forest landowners in Texas to maintain the economic and recreation uses of their forests. By offering interested Texans this opportunity, the Texas Forest Service hopes to sustain the benefits of Texas forests, including economic development, enhanced water and air quality, habitat diversity, and historical preservation. In order to participate in the Forest Legacy Program, the Texas Forest Service compiled an Assessment of Need document, available below, evaluating existing forest resources and conditions, identifying threats to Texas forests, and detailing how the program will work in Texas. http://texasforestservice.tamu.edu/pdf/admin/ir/tflp/tflp%20aon.pdf

SELECTION CRITERIA Degree of threat: Priority will be given to projects on properties that have proof of a high degree of threat of development or parcelization. Forest resource economic benefits: Priority will be given to properties that are likely to have significant forest resource economic benefits. Public benefits: Priority will be given to properties that are likely to have direct and indirect scenic and/or outdoor recreation benefits. Water quality and watershed protection: Priority will be given to properties that are likely to have significant water quality and watershed protection benefits. Ecological/Cultural benefits: Priority will be given to properties that are likely to have significant ecological, cultural, and environmental education benefits. Proof of Readiness: Priority will be given to projects that have community support, identified matching funds and partnership involvement. Strategic Initiative: Priority will be given to projects that fit within a larger conservation plan, strategy, or initiative, and connect to or lead to additional conservation investments in the region. TIMBER PRODUCTION Support Texas rural communities, traditional land uses, and cultural heritage by maintaining large privately owned working forest landscapes managed according to sustainable best management practices. WILDLIFE Promote conservation of biological diversity by protecting habitat connectivity, unique ecosystems, and endangered species. WATERSHED PROTECTION Promote watershed protection to enhance water quality and quantity and to protect aquatic habitats. OPEN SPACE Support open space initiatives to decrease forest fragmentation, protect unique habitats or ecological features, and reduce negative effects of urban sprawl.

Landowners who wish to participate in the program may be asked to provide the following information:

1) Name, address and phone number of applicant landowner. 2) All other owners of record for this tract, and their addresses. 3) Name, address and phone number of authorized agent representing landowner(s), if applicable. 4) Location of property. 5) If the landowner intends to reserve rights to forestry uses or other resource management activities, a copy or reference to the State-approved landowner Forest Stewardship Plan or multi-resource management plan.** 6) List of the significant scenic, natural, recreational, wildlife, timber and other resource values contained on the property. 7) Identification of all dams, dumps or waste disposal sites on the property. 8) Signed statement giving the FS and State lead agency permission to enter the property for review and appraisal purposes. 9) Legal description. 10) List any encumbrances or liens existing on the property including, but not limited to contracts, leases, or outstanding rights not of record. 11) Copy of plat or survey map of the property, if existing. If only a portion of the property is being offered, identify it on a plat showing the portion offered in the context of the entire tract. 12) Tract acreage and total number of acres of forests and cleared/open land. 13) List of existing permanent improvements on the tract, including houses, barns, lakes, ponds, dams, wells, roads, and other structures, and total number of acres occupied by improvements. ** A State approved Forest Stewardship Management Plan must be in place at the time of the closing. Language in the easement will refer to the plan and will require that the plan be reviewed every 5 years.