STABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE COLUMN - STEEL BEAM JOINT UNDER SEISMIC LOADING

Similar documents
STUDY OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF WELDED T-JOINTS IN HOLLOW CIRCULAR STEEL SECTIONS

Investigation on Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Beam Column Joints Retrofitted with FRP Wrapping

ANALYTICAL STUDY OF ECCENTRIC BEAM COLOUMN JOINT

Pushover Analysis of High Rise Reinforced Concrete Building with and without Infill walls

High Performance and Efficiency of Joints in Precast Members

AN ANALYSIS OF THE BEHAVIOR OF HYBRID STEEL BEAM RC COLUMN CONNECTION

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FLEXURAL BEHAVIOUR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE HOLLOW CORE SANDWICH BEAMS

SHEAR STRENGTH CAPACITY OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM- COLUMN JOINT FOCUSING ON TENDON ANCHORAGE LOCATION

PERFORMANCE OF RC BRIDGE COLUMNS SUBJECTED TO LATERAL LOADING

Effect of beam dimensions on structural performance of wide beam-column joints

Comparative Study on ECC and RCC Beam Column Connections for Enhancing Seismic Resistance

Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Column with ANSYS

STUDY ON SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF KNEE BRACED STEEL FRAMES

Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Dual Structural System: Strength, Deformation Characteristics, and Failure Mechanism

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 2, No 2, 2011

STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR OF HOLLOW STEEL SECTIONS UNDER COMBINED AXIAL COMPRESSION AND BENDING

THE EFFECTS OF P-DELTA AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS OF RCC AND STEEL BUILDING WITH RESPECT TO LINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS

Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams using Near-Surface Mounted FRP Mohamed Husain 1, Khaled Fawzy 2, and Mahmoud Nasr 3

Seismic design of braced frame gusset plate connections

Seismic Retrofit Of RC Columns With Inadequate Lap-Splice Length By External Post-Tensioned High-Strength Strips

Stability Analysis of Rigid Steel Frames With and Without Bracing Systems under the Effect of Seismic and Wind Loads

Journal of Asian Scientific Research EVALUATION OF RECTANGULAR CONCRETE-FILLED STEEL-HOLLOW SECTION BEAM-COLUMNS

Behaviour of Concrete Filled Rectangular Steel Tube Column

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 05, 2016 ISSN (online):

ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION OF RC CURVED BEAMS

Behaviour of FRP wrapped circular reinforced concrete columns

TENSILE STRENGTH OF BRICK MASONRY. A.R. Santhakumar 1, S.Ashok 2

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 2, No 2, 2011

Analytical Study on Seismic Performance of Hybrid (DUAL) Structural System Subjected To Earthquake

NON-LINEAR FEM ANALYSIS FOR CES SHEAR WALLS

Interaction between ductile RC perimeter frames and floor slabs containing precast units

RETROFITTING OF COLUMNS WITH RC JACKETTING AN EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOR

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF CONCRETE TILT-UP BUILDINGS: CURRENT WALL-TO-SLAB CONNECTIONS

Truss bridge structure frame section analysis by using Finite element analysis

ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF RCC AND COMPOSITE STRUCTURE WITH BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE PIER COLUMNS SUBJECTED TO SEISMIS LOADING

Non Linear Analysis of Composite Beam Slab Junction with Shear Connectors using Ansys.16

Crack detection in composite bridges with relative displacement sensors

Comparative Study of Equivalent Static Analysis and Response spectrum analysis on Flat Slab Using Etabs

Infill Precast Panels as Retrofit System of Reinforced Concrete Frames

Eccentric Beam-Column Connections

Ultimate strength prediction for reinforced concrete slabs externally strengthened by fiber reinforced polymer (FRP)

BEHAVIOR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM WITH OPENING

Pile to Slab Bridge Connections

Seismic Behaviour of RC Shear Walls

Experimental Study of Reinforced Concrete (RC) Beams Strengthened by Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP): Effect of Beam Size and Length of CFRP.

EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF A G+12 STOREY BUILDING WITH AND WITHOUT INFILL FOR BHUJ AND KOYNA EARTHQUAKE FUNCTIONS

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON PARTIAL REPLACEMENT OF CEMENT WITH METAKAOLIN AND SAND WITH QUARRY DUST OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM.

Experimental investigation of the use of CFRP grid for shear strengthening of RC beams

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

SHEAR BEHAVIOR OF RC DEEP BEAMS WITH SOLID CIRCULAR CROSS SECTION UNDER SIMPLY SUPPORTED CONDITION AND ANTI-SYMMETRIC MOMENT

Structural Behaviors of Deep RC Beams under Combined Axial and Bending Force

Numerical study of shear wall behavior coupled with HPFRCC beam and diagonal reinforcements

Unit 48: Structural Behaviour and Detailing for Construction. Limit State Design

Seismic Analysis of Steel Frames with Different Bracings using ETSBS Software.

Analysis of RCC Beams using ABAQUS

A COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON ELEVATED WATER TANK DUE TO DYNAMIC LOADING

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 2, No 2, 2011

Effect of Torsion Consideration in Analysis of Multi Storey frame

PERFORMANCE OF MECHANICAL SEISMIC LOAD TRANSMISSION DEVICE BASED ON IMPACT

Seismic Behavior of Soft First Storey

Fagà, Bianco, Bolognini, and Nascimbene 3rd fib International Congress

In-plane testing of precast concrete wall panels with grouted sleeve

Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Corbels

A Study on Hybrid FRP Wrapped Axially Loaded RC Capsule Column

Research on the Influence of Infill Walls on Seismic Performance of Masonry Buildings with Bottom Frame-Shear Walls

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016

Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition

Effect of Near Surface Mounted (NSM) Steel Bars on Shear Strength of RC Beams

Base Isolation In Seismic Structural Design

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FLEXURAL BEHAVIOR OF RC BEAMS STRENGTHENED WITH SMPM

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

SEISMIC RETROFIT OF BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS WITH FRP SHEETS

SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS USING CARBON FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER (CFRP)

STRENGTH AND BEHAVIOUR OF GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE BEAMS

Extreme Loading for Structures Version 3.1

SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF RC BUILDING FRAME WITH STEEL BRACING SYSTEM USING VARIOUS ARRANGEMENTS

BUCKLING BEHAVIOR OF PARTIALLY EMBEDDED REINFORCED CONCRETE PILES IN SAND

DETERMINATION OF FAILURE STRENGTH OF CURVED PLATE WELD JOINT USING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Literature Review on Design of Metro Bridge Pears

Comparative Study On Seismic Behaviour Of Steel Knee Braced Frame With Eccentric Braced Frame

Determination of Failure Strength of Flat Plate Weld Joint Using Finite Element Analysis

Study of Shear Behavior of RC Beams: Non Linear Analysis

Earthquake Design of Flexible Soil Retaining Structures

Performance Based Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Building

SEISMIC EVALUATION OF BUILDINGS WITH POSTTENSIONED BEAMS BY NON-LINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS

Softening Coefficients for Prestressed Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete. Prestressed Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete in Tension.

GFRP HOLLOW-CORE REBARS FOR CONCRETE BEAMS

IMPROVEMENT OF THE DEFORMATION CAPACITY BY THE USE OF FIBERS

INFLUENCE OF BNWF SOIL MODELLING ON DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF PILE FOUNDATION FOR RC FRAME WITH STRUCTURAL WALL

Seismic Detailing of RC Structures (IS: )

ANALYSIS OF SIMPLY SUPPORTED REINFORCED CONCRETE SKEW SLABS

Inelastic Versus Elastic Displacement-Based Intensity Measures for Seismic Analysis

CYCLIC TESTING OF BOLTED CONTINUOUS I-BEAM-TO-HOLLOW SECTION COLUMN CONNECTIONS

Influence on Durability of Concrete Slab in Composite Bridge due to Use of Elastic Supports

CYCLIC LOADING TEST OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMN WITH HOLLOW SECTION AND HIGH LONGITUDIAL STEEL RATIO UNDER HIGH AXIAL LOADING

Experimental Study on Shear Splitting Failure of Full-Scale Composite Concrete Encased Steel Beams

NON-LINEAR STATIC PUSHOVER ANALYSIS FOR MULTI-STORED BUILDING BY USING ETABS

Original Publication: International Journal of High-Rise Buildings Volume 5 Number 3

Comparative Study of R.C.C and Steel Concrete Composite Structures

Transcription:

STABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE COLUMN - STEEL BEAM JOINT UNDER SEISMIC LOADING Abinaya R N 1 Priyadharshini M 2 1 PG Scholar, Department of civil engineering, Dr. Mahalingam College of engineering and technology, pollachi, India 2Assistant professor, Department of civil Engineering, Dr. Mahalingam College of engineering and technology, pollachi, India --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------***------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - The cyclic behavior of connection containing steel beam concrete column is analyzed in this paper. Experimental analysis of beam column is done and the result is presented at the end. To avoid the severe damage in the joint region the hybrid section is considered. This will be help in future to save building from the damage due the vibration of the ground. This will enable the better safety to the occupants in the buildings. The safety of the building lies mainly in the joints where the damages occur severe due to the less vibration. This severe damage alters the load carrying capacity of the building in any manner. To make the building stronger than the conventional method this hybrid section is considered.this type is done in the other countries more commonly than in India. The results are compared and presented in this paper. The strength is increased by 30% when compared to the homogeneous material. Key word: Concrete column Steel beam; seismic loading; cyclic behavior. 1. INTRODUCTION In the past few years of the world history the most damage of the building are occurred due the vibration of the ground. To make the building from the damage due to the vibration of the ground this paper is analyzed both in theoretical and in experimental methods to make the building safer way. This is a method in which the safety of the building is ensued to be little safer from the damage when compared to the conventional joint. This will ensure the safety against the damage due to vibration. To prevent this damage due the vibration. There should be some changes made in the design procedure or in the usage of the materials. The damage in the structure can be reduced so that the life of the building can increased. The major damage are occurred in the beam column joint so that the maximum care should be taken in the joint so that to avoid the damage to safeguard the structure. The steel will save the material cost and the concrete will have higher compressive strength so that the material cost will be lower when compared to the only usage of steel and only usage of concrete materials. This makes the member in an effective way so that the strength of the member is increased so that the load carrying of the member is increased. These composite constructions were studied in several countries to enhance the effect to the vibration. This is effectively used for the high rise building in which the damage occurs in larger amount to reduce the effect of the in smaller amount this method is adopted for construction in the foreign countries like America, Japan Taiwan the experiments are done to increase the strength of the building. The pervious papers are done with the connection of the slab attached to the column beam. In these papers the joint were slab is not considered. The critical section in the structure is considered as beam column joint. In the building the beam - column area is considered to be more critical section.the higher importance is to be given to the beam column joint. The joint should be effective to with stand the higher load. The beam column joint are connected by welded joint. The steel beam resists the tensile force and the concrete column resists the compressive force. To make the beam column effective steel beam concrete column are used. The steel beam is effective in reducing the seismic effect. The bending moment in the columns are due the eccentricity of axial force, the lateral force from the beam, the condition of the column. The seismic vibration is considered according to the zone from IS CODE 13920, the detailing for seismic load for RC column IS 1893-1984 codes are used. The seismic loads are in the form of vibration which is travel in the longitudinal and transverse direction. Due to the vibration of the ground motion, the structure gets shaked in the direction of the vibration or in the direction opposite to the vibration. This vibration cause the damage in the joint which gets deformed and the transfer of the load get affected so that the joint get damaged. 2.COMPOSITE STRUCTRE A structural member composed of two or more materials which act as single material during the application of the load is referred as composite construction. During the joining of the composite construction the properties of the 2017, IRJET Impact Factor value: 5.181 ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal Page 1694

material do not change but the materials properties may alter during the application of load. This will enhance the durability of the material.the combination are made between steel-concrete, wood-concrete, steel-wood, and other types of combination are made. The mainly used combination in civil engineering is steel concrete combination. The other combination is rarely used when there is need for the other combination. The composite structure is considered as the mixture of the two or more materials that in the strength of the material get increased. The increased in the strength results in the higher load carrying capacity of structure get increased. The most critical part in the building is the beam column joint in which the damage occurs most commonly due the lateral load. To overcome this damage the composite construction is preferred. The beam column joint is the most important and the critical area to be considered during the application of load. So it is considered to be an important part to make the beam column joint effective. Since the joint are effective the damage may occur due to seismic vibration. To avoid the damage due vibration, the beam column joint should be made effective. 2.1 HOMOGENEOUS MATERIAL The homogeneous material are the same material in which the strength in one area is higher and the strength in the another area is low which result in the damage of the Structure. The most critical part in the building is the beam column joint in which the damage occurs most commonly due the lateral load. To overcome this damage the composite construction is preferred. The beam column joint is the most important and the critical area to be considered during the application of load. The steel beam resists the tensile force and the concrete column resists the compressive force. To make the beam column effective steel beam concrete column are used. The steel beam is effective in reducing the seismic energy. The bending moment in the columns are due the eccentricity of axial force, the lateral force from the beam, the condition of the column. This vibration cause the damage in the joint which gets deformed and the transfer of the load get affected so that the joint get damaged. So the homogeneous are to be avoided. 2.2 HETROGENEOUS MATERIAL It is most effective type of construction to with stand both compressive strength and tensile strength.these combination are mostly used now a days in heavy load carrying structure to withstand the applied load. In the structure the concrete can with stand the compressive strength and the steel can with stand the tensile strength. The combination of the two materials enhances their physical properties but also increase the strength of the structure. In this concept the compressive strength of the concrete and the tensile strength of the steel are effectively used. ADVANTAGE Saving in weight of the structure. Steel component has the ability to absorb the energy due to seismic energy. Construction time is reduced. High ductility of steel lead to better seismic resistance of the composite section. Minimum disturbance to traffic in bridge construction. Ability to cover large column free area. The steel concrete construction has higher strength than the other composite materials. The thermal expansion of the steel and concrete are same. 2017, IRJET Impact Factor value: 5.181 ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal Page 1695 3. ANALYTICAL ANALYSIS: Finite Element Method is used to solve the complex problem using software called ANSYS. In this the elements are divided into a smaller section so that the stress in a point is calculated. By dividing the elements the properties of the elements does not get altered. The stress and strain in the element are expressed in terms of nodal displacement. The principle of virtual work is used to derive the equation of motion. The boundary condition and the loads are applied in the required to obtain the solution.the analytical analysis is done by using the software called ANSYS that helps to know the ultimate load carrying capacity of the model by which the capacity of the model is pre- determined. This will helps us to known the capacity of the member that can carry maximum and helps to know the value range by which the value can be known the failure mode can be analyzed so that the minute failure mode can be known easily. The solving time required for the problem in ANSYS depends up on the complexity of the problem in the time is 60% less than by solving manually. Sketching- In the Sketching the models are drawn.if the models cannot be drawn in sketching it can be imported from other modeling software such as AUTOCADD. Modelling- After sketching it is extrude into the modeling, the dimension are checked. Meshing- The meshing is done automatically. Solution - In the solution the load,boundary condition,required result such as deformation, stress, strain are to be given. Then the problem is solved, the result will be obtained. 3.1 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS Finite Element Method is used to solve the complex problem using software called ANSYS. In this the elements are divided into a smaller section so that the stress in a

point is calculated. By dividing the elements the properties of the elements does not get altered. The stress and strain in the element are expressed in terms of nodal displacement. The principle of virtual work is used to derive the equation of motion. The boundary condition and the loads are applied in the required to obtain the solution Preprocessor - In this the models are created, the changes in the model are done. Solution-The load value, support condition, constrains can be given. In this step the finite element solution occurs. General post processor this is the last step in which the solutions are obtained. The changes in the solution can be One by changing the values in the General post processor the analytical analysis is done by using the software called ANSYS that helps to know the ultimate load carrying capacity of the model by which the capacity of the model is pre- determined. This will helps us to known the capacity of the member that can carry maximum and helps to know the value range by which the value can be known the failure mode can be analyzed so that the minute failure mode can be known easily. In this the modeling is done in AUTOCADD and is imported to ansys and the structure is analyzed and the results are obtained. In the Sketching the models are drawn. If the models cannot be drawn in sketching it can be imported from other modeling software such as AUTOCADD 3.2 SPECIFICATION OF THE BEAM COLUMN JOINT. Fig 1 Beam column joint Fig 2 strain of beam column joint Size of the concrete = 200mm*300mm Size of the steel section = ISMB 150 Diameter of the reinforcement = 12mm Diameter of the stripes = 8mm Strength of the I section = 420N/mm 2 Grade of concrete = 40N/mm 2 Grade of steel = 415N/mm 2 Length of the column =800mm Length of the I section =600mm Fig 3stress of beam column joint The young s modules, possions ratio values are entered and the results are obtained and the results are obtained in the form of graph. The values are obtained.the beam is welded to the reinforcement of the column so that the beam is fixed to the column. Fig 4 stress in reinforcement 2017, IRJET Impact Factor value: 5.181 ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal Page 1696

DEFORMATION International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-issn: 2395-0056 4.1TEST SETUP In this the column is made fixed at the both ends fixed and the column is made fixed so that it acts fixed end and is stable. During the application of the load on the beam the column get lifted due the load on the beam.in that time the displacement of the beam is measured using lvdt. Fig 5 Loading details 1200 1000 At Fixed End At loading point 800 600 LENGTH 400 200 0 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0-0.02 Fig 6 testing apparatus The load is applied in the beam in which one end is fixed and the other end is free so that the load is applied. Since the beam is welded to the reinforcement to the column so that the load is transferred to the reinforcement so that it can with stand higher load results in the lesser damage of the structure and it can resist higher load so that the building will resist the higher load and it will make the building life increased. The load is applied on the beam so that deflection is measured using lvdt. 4.2 APPLICATION OF THE LOAD The load is applied on the beam and the deflection is calculated Chart 1 Deformation curve The analytical work is done and the results are obtained. And the graph is drawn and the deflection maximum is 0.115mm 4. EXPERIMENTAL WORK The experimental work is done by using load cell in which the load is applied by hydraulic jack. In this the deflection is measured by lvdt and the load is applied by the load cell in which the pressure is given by the hydraulic jack the vibration is given by the shake table attached to the loading frame. Fig 7 load applied 2017, IRJET Impact Factor value: 5.181 ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal Page 1697

In this the load is applied and the crack pattern is found. 4.3 RESULT 5. CONCLUSION In this paper the outcome is obtained and is increased about 30% when compared to the pervious paper.thus the results are obtained and the maximum ultimate load is 266kN. The percentage of error between the analytical and experimental values is 10%.Thus the composite structure increase the load carrying capacity of the structure and prevents the structure from the damage. 6. FURTURE WORK In this paper the future work can be done by varying the depth of penetration of the beam and also to prevent the damage of the outer end of the beam due to corrosion. 7. REFERENCES Fig 8 initial crack Fig 9 initial crack 1. Chin-Tung Cheng, Cheng Chin Cheh, Seismic Behaviour of Steel Beam and Reinforced Concrete Column Connections, Journal of Construction Steel Research, 2005. 2.Gustavo J PARRA-MONTESINOS And James K WIGHT, Behaviour and Strength of RC Column-to-Steel Beam Connections Subjected to Seismic Loading, 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 2003, Paper No. 1485. 3. Chin-Tung CHENG and Cheng-Chi CHEN Test and Behavior of Steel Beam and Reinforced Concrete Column Connections, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August 1-6, 2004, Paper No. 422. 4.Haibei XIONG1, Shaobo LIN Experimental Study on Behavior of Steel Beam to Concrete Column Connection 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 3247. 5. ASCE Task Committee on Design Criteria for Composite Structures in Steel and Concrete (1994), Guidelines for design of joints between steel beam and RC columns, Journals of structural engineering. 1994. 6. Engineering/Bureau of Engineering Research, the University of Texas at Austin, August, 1987. Fig10 Final crack 2017, IRJET Impact Factor value: 5.181 ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal Page 1698