MAY 4, Noise Barrier Presentation NE Quadrant Smith Avenue, Cherry Hill Circle NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.

Similar documents
Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

DECISION REGARDING NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Traffic Noise Analysis

Installation of a noise wall on Provincial land on the east side of Deerfoot Trail SE south of Highway 22X.

Dulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy. February 2, 2011

US 53 Noise Mitigation

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM

Peak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms.

1. Introduction Noise Analysis Results Figures. List of Tables

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project? What is an impacted location?

NORTHWEST CORRIDOR PROJECT. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT 2015 Addendum Phase IV

Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520

Chapter 4: Alternatives Analysis

WELCOME IL 47. Community Advisory Group Meeting #5 Waubonsee Community College Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Noise Analysis Study along I Tim Bjorneberg Project Development Program Manager SDDOT

Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines

APPENDIX C. Environmental Noise Assessment

NOISE STUDY REPORT. for the WEKIVA PARKWAY (SR 429)/SR 46 REALIGNMENT PD&E STUDY. Orange, Lake, and Seminole Counties, Florida

APPENDIX A TIER 1 ANALYSIS

FEDERAL BOULEVARD (5 TH AVENUE TO HOWARD PLACE) PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGE STUDY TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS

COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT

Information Sheet - Mountain Highway Interchange Noise Assessment and Sound Mitigation

Virginia Department Of Transportation. Highway Traffic Noise Impact Analysis Guidance Manual

M E T R O P O L I T A N W A S H I N G T O N A I R P O R T S A U T H O R I T Y. Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Wall Program

4.7 NOISE. Introduction. Decibels and Frequency. Perception of the Receiver and A-Weighting

BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA

NOISE BARRIER ANALYSIS

Welcome to the Noise Barrier Workshop

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Appendix D Environmental Noise Assessment

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

APPENDIX H COMPARISON OF FUTURE NOISE BARRIER OPTIONS

Virginia Department of Transportation I-66 Tier 2 Environmental Assessment

Noise Assessment Report Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON

SR 9/I-95 Interchange at 45th Street PD&E Study Palm Beach County, Florida FPID No.: FAP No.: ETDM No.

Airborne Noise and The New NY Bridge Project

Appendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment

Public Informational Meeting November 8, 2007 Route 110 and 113 Methuen Rotary Interchange Study

Constructing SoundPLAN Models for Noise Studies That Are Consistent With the HUD Noise Guidebook

Route 7 Corridor Improvements Project Reston Avenue to Jarrett Valley Drive Public Hearing

MCKENZIE INTERCHANGE PROJECT

NOISE STUDY REPORT. Interstate 75 / State Road 951 Ultimate Interchange Improvements PD&E Study. Collier County. June 20, 2013

FHWA/FTA/FRA Joint Project Procedures. Mark Ferroni Noise Team Leader July 22 25, 2007

4.10 NOISE. A. Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Acoustics

Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Project. Public Information Meeting

Noise Impact Study for UMore Park Sand and Gravel Resources

TRAFFIC NOISE STUDY REPORT

Highway Traffic Noise: Analysis and Abatement Guidance

12-1 INTRODUCTION 12-2 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

Noise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts

LONE HILL TO WHITE DOUBLE TRACK STUDY Community Open Houses May 16 & 17

D5 NOISE ABATEMENT FENCING ACOUSTIC REFLECTIVE BARRIER

FIGURE N-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES

BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS

Policy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads

4.13 NOISE AND VIBRATION

Environmental Assessment May 2007

General Plan Update Workshop #6 Overview of the Kern County General Plan Noise and Safety Elements (Fiscal Impact: None) All S.D.s

Noise Reduction and Asphalt Rubber. Douglas D. Carlson RPA Deputy Director Asphalt Rubber Greenbook Workshop 08/22/02 UCSB, California

Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page 14-1 Staten Island Supreme Courthouse Project Draft EIS

15.1 INTRODUCTION CONTEXT

I-10 CONNECT. Public Meeting #1

Report on the Status of Rubberized Asphalt Traffic Noise Reduction in Sacramento County

Categorical Exclusion (CE)

Northwest State Route 138 Corridor Improvement Project

Railway noise mitigation factsheet 05: Cuttings and earth berms

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario

9.0 Noise and Vibration

Appendix F. Environmental Noise Assessment

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Project Descriptions ($ millions)

TRAFFIC NOISE REPORT

Ohio Department of Transportation

5 INFORMATION UPDATE TRAFFIC NOISE ASSESSMENT TESTON ROAD CITY OF VAUGHAN

Draft Noise Study Report

Wind Energy Ordinances

APPENDIX 3.11-A NOISE ANALYSIS DATA

CHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES

E. NOISE AND VIBRATION

I-10 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS STAGE 0 FEASIBILITY STUDY STATE PROJECT NUMBER H FEDERAL AID PROJECT NUMBER H004100

AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COUNTY OF KANE

Noise Impact Study for Hyatt House in Davis, California

TTM & Residential Development Noise Impact Study City of San Jacinto, CA

12 November Ms. Winnie Lam Project Manager L.F. George Properties 159 El Camino Real Millbrae, CA 94030

Evaluation of noise impacts associated with a proposed commercial retail project typically includes the following:

APPENDIX B. Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies

State Route 8 Bridge Replacement Project

Project Team. D6 South Miami-Dade Resident Engineer Erik Padron, P.E. D6 Construction Project Manager Dari Vorce

Effect of roadside vegetation on the reduction of traffic noise levels

Bonnie Doon Grade Separation

UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD

Place Vanier Édifice AEFO

South Access to the Golden Gate Bridge Doyle Drive Project EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Acoustics and Classrooms BARD MANUFACTURING COMPANY REGISTERED AIA PRESENTER VAUGHAN SMITH

New McNicoll Bus Garage Public Open House

State Highway 10A Improvements (from the SH-10 junction extending 6.18 miles east to the SH-100 junction, Muskogee and Sequoyah Counties, Oklahoma)

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Subject: Additional Considerations for AASHTO Standard Methods of Test TP 98 (SIP) and TP 99 (CTIM)

Transcription:

MAY 4, 2011 Noise Barrier Presentation NE Quadrant Smith Avenue, Cherry Hill Circle 1

Introductions Agenda Overview of Interchange Project Overview of noise barrier process Fundamentals of sound & proposed noise barrier Discussion and voting 2

3

Existing Methuen Rotary (Exit 46; 2004) Proposed Partial Cloverleaf at Exit 46; approx. 2016 4

I-93 SB I-93 NB 34 30 26 27 40 Cherry Hill Cir. 26 24 20 16 Rte. 110/113 5

Sound Fundamentals Pressure Wave Travels in a Straight Line Threshold of Hearing 20 MicroPascals = 0 Decibels Hearing Range Spans 0 to 110 db A-Weighted Decibels 6

Sound Levels in Decibels The A-weighting Curve (dba) approximates how people hear sound 7

Sound Level (dba) Sound Study Uses the Leq Energy-Average Sound Level Time 8

Common Sound Levels Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. 9

Sound Attenuation Waves spread out with distance Waves are reflected by terrain and structures Waves are absorbed and blocked by sound barrier walls 10

Highway Sounds 11

Distance Attenuation -3 dba for every doubling of distance from a roadway Travel lane sound source 3 6 9 12 Distance (feet) 12

Sound Barrier Walls An effective sound wall blocks the line of sight to most sections of a roadway 13

Acoustic Study Process Measurements Over 8 Days October 2008 Calculate Future Sound Levels Determine Traffic Noise Impacts Design Noise Mitigation 14

Noise Study Assumptions Analyze the Noisiest Traffic Hour (NTH) L eq for 2 p.m. to 3 p.m. weekday Dry roads, calm winds No leaves on trees 15

Sound Fundamentals Change in Sound Levels 3 dba Just Audible 5 dba Noticeable 10 dba Double Loudness 16

Study Area & Sound Monitoring Locations 27 Smith Ave. Valley Office Park 1 Heather Dr. 447 Lowell St. 16 Allen St. 4 Noyes St. 17

Acoustic Study FHWA Traffic Noise Model (TNM) Study Alternatives 2009 Existing Conditions 2030 No-Build 2030 Build Improvements Sound levels predicted at homes within 500 feet of project roadways 18

Sound Levels At Homes Within 500 of I-93, Routes 110/113 Study Condition 1-hour L eq (dba) 2009 Existing Conditions 59 74 2030 No-Build 61 75 2030 Build Improvements 62 75 19

Typical Noise Barrier 20

MassDOT Noise Abatement Policy Type I Noise barriers built as part of new highway construction Type II Noise barriers built on existing highways (no new highway construction) 21

MassDOT and FHWA Define a Traffic Noise Impact as a Sound Level at a Residence 66 + dba, or Increase of 10 dba 22

MassDOT Noise Abatement Policy Feasibility of Noise Barrier Goal Noise barrier to achieve a 10 dba reduction for first row of residences Minimum Requirement - Achieve a 7 dba reduction for first row of residences Issues to consider Include: Driveways Cross Streets Wetlands 23

MassDOT Noise Abatement Policy Reasonableness of Noise Barrier Cost Effectiveness Index (CEI) <= $2,700 CEI = Barrier cost $ 1 / # homes protected / insertion loss in dba Example CEI = $2,696 = $496,000 / 23 Homes protected / 8.0 dba 1 Using an assumed cost of $16/SF. Actual costs are higher at $65/SF. 24

Smith Ave./Cherry Hill Circle Noise Barrier Design Average Noise Reduction 23 Homes 8.0 dba Noise Barrier Dimensions Length 1,240 feet Height 25 feet above grade 25

Smith Avenue/Cherry Hill Circle Existing Sound Levels (2009) 64 to 74 dba Future Sound Levels No Barrier (2030) 65 to 75 dba Future Sound Levels with Barrier (2030) 59 to 68 dba 26

Sound Levels in 2030 Residence No Barrier With Barrier Reduction (dba) (dba) (dba) 3 Smith Avenue 64.7 62.3 2.4 5 Smith Avenue 64.6 61.6 3.0 7 Smith Avenue 65 61.4 3.6 8 Smith Avenue 65.1 61.6 3.5 9 Smith Avenue 65.5 61.3 4.2 11 Smith Avenue 66.4 61.2 5.2 12 Smith Avenue 66 61.5 4.5 13 Smith Avenue 68 61.2 6.8 15 Smith Avenue 69.2 60.8 8.4 16 Smith Avenue 66.7 61.3 5.4 19 Smith Avenue 71.2 60.3 10.9 20 Smith Avenue 67.8 60.8 7.0 24 Smith Avenue 68.1 59.8 8.3 26 Smith Avenue 70.2 59.5 10.7 27 Smith Avenue 74.8 59.4 15.4 27

Sound Levels in 2030 Residence No Barrier With Barrier Reduction (dba) (dba) (dba) 1 Cherry Hill Circle 66.6 62.3 4.3 2 Cherry Hill Circle 65.4 61.4 4.0 5 Cherry Hill Circle 67.9 62.2 5.7 6 Cherry Hill Circle 66.4 61.6 4.8 9 Cherry Hill Circle 69.4 62.6 6.8 10 Cherry Hill Circle 67.7 61.4 6.3 14 Cherry Hill Circle 69 61.3 7.7 15 Cherry Hill Circle 71.1 63.1 8.0 17 Cherry Hill Circle 70.9 65.0 5.9 18 Cherry Hill Circle 70.5 61.3 9.2 21 Cherry Hill Circle 70.9 66.5 4.4 22 Cherry Hill Circle 72.2 61.6 10.6 26 Cherry Hill Circle 74.2 62.3 11.9 30 Cherry Hill Circle 73.8 63.1 10.7 34 Cherry Hill Circle 73.3 65.2 8.1 40 Cherry Hill Circle 73.1 68.0 5.1 66 Forest Street 70.3 67.6 2.7 84 Forest Street 72.7 70.9 1.8 88 Forest Street 74.9 74.5 0.4 28

Methuen Noise Barrier Context I-93 NB Cherry Hill Cir. Smith Ave. 29

Barrier Smith Ave./Cherry Hill Cir. 1 2 3 4 Proposed Noise Barrier 30

Existing View #1 Between 34 and 40 Cherry Hill Circle 31

Existing View #2 From Smith Avenue cul-de-sac 32

Barrier Appearance #2 View from Smith Avenue cul-de-sac Preliminary Artist s Rendering 33

Barrier Appearance #2 View from Smith Avenue cul-de-sac Existing View Preliminary Artist s Rendering View with Proposed Noise Barrier 34

Existing View #3 From 26 Smith Avenue 35

Barrier Appearance #3 View from 26 Smith Avenue Preliminary Artist s Rendering 36

Barrier Appearance #3 View from 26 Smith Avenue Preliminary Artist s Rendering Existing View View with Proposed Noise Barrier 37

Existing View #4 From 12 Smith Avenue 38

Noise Barrier Design Schedule First Abutter Meeting today! Second Abutter Meeting to discuss noise barrier design and landscaping Fall 2011 39

Questions/Voting 40