TEST REPORT. Fire resistance load-bearing test of a 136mm thick Ozone Panels wall system tested in accordance with AS

Similar documents
Property of Cooks Plumbing Supplies

Fire Engineering, the BCA (NCC) & Bushfire Calculator. Keith Nicholls - Manager Product Testing and Assessments (Australia) Exova Group Limited

Thermal Performance of Plasterboard Lined Steel Stud Walls

Title: The Fire Resistance Performance of Modified Timber Based Panelled Doorsets. WF Assessment Report No: Issue 8.

P.O. Box ZN Bleiswijk Brandpuntlaan Zuid NZ Bleiswijk The Netherlands

This classification report consists of five pages and may only be used or reproduced in its entirety.

Assessment Number BTC 14254FA

CLASSIFICATION OF FIRE RESISTANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BS EN : A1:2009

3M CS-195+ Composite Sheet Product Description

SECTION B Steel Frame Wall Systems. Contents. Steel Stud Selection Tables. Introduction. Design Considerations. Installation.

Title: The Fire Resistance Performance of PRT and PRC, Side and Centre-Opening, Vandal Resistant, Lift Landing Doorsets. WF Assessment Report No:

Title: The Fire Resistance Performance of PRT and PRC, Side and Centre-Opening Lift Landing Doorsets. WF Assessment Report No: Prepared for: Klefer SA

Page No 1 Introduction... 3

QUALITY CONTROL TESTING OF PLASTERBOARD FOR BRACING APPLICATIONS. Y L Liew Vicroads Victoria, Australia

SECTION D Masonry Wall Systems. Contents. Introduction. Design Considerations. Installation. Components. System Specifications.

BRE Global Ltd Watford, Herts WD25 9XX. d+b facades (UK) Ltd. The Packway, Larkhill, Salisbury, SP4 8PY. Customer Services

BS 476: Part 7: Method For Classification Of The Surface Spread Of Flame Of Products. A Report To: Thermaflex International Holding B.V.

Fire Safety and Performance of Wood in Multi-Residential and Commercial Buildings. Boris Iskra Forest & Wood Products Australia

External Steel Stud and Top Hat Walls. Details SYSTEMS 176 NON-FIRE RATED SYSTEMS 176 FIRE RATED SYSTEMS 178 BRICK VENEER SYSTEMS 183 INSTALLATION 185

CertMark Australasia CodeMark Assessment Brief' THE OZONE PANEL BUILDING SYSTEM. For

GypLyner (walls) Metal framed wall lining system. GypLyner.

USGBORAL.COM SYSTEMS+ INTRODUCTION OUTRWALL BRICK VENEER WALLS EXTERNAL WALLS INNOVATIVE SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS

The Steel Construction Institute

Annex C Cavity Closures

The extra strong, extra durable, sound resistant system that you can direct fix to

P.O. Box ZN Bleiswijk Brandpuntlaan Zuid NZ Bleiswijk The Netherlands

THE PERFORMANCE OF CONCRETE GROUND FLOOR SLAB REINFORCEMENT TO CONTROL SHRINKAGE CRACKING. D H Chisholm 1

Axial shortening in an 80-storey concrete building

Report on Structural Stability of Engineered Lumber in Fire Conditions

TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) No TEST PROCEDURE FOR WIND AND WIND DRIVEN RAIN RESISTANCE OF DISCONTINUOUS ROOF SYSTEMS

TER No Cultured Stone & ProStone Applications Over Continuous Insulation

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: SIMTEK FENCE. TYPE: SimTek Privacy Fence System

ROOFING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) No. 102(A)-95

TEST REPORT. Report No.: B Rendered to: TREMCO, INCORPORATED Beachwood, Ohio

NFP Epiradiateur Test. WF Report Number: (Issue 2) Test Sponsor: Fiba Tech Industries Limited. Date of original report:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 614 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

ESR-2961 Reissued September 1, 2011 This report is subject to renewal in two years.

Tiling Tiling

UL Design System HW-D-1012 continued

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: COMPOSITE WALL PANELS REPORT HOLDER: PARKLEX USA

OutRWALL. Exterior Wall Systems for Residential Construction. 314DC Issue 1

REPORT HOLDER: OMEGA PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC CALIFORNIA AVENUE CORONA, CALIFORNIA EVALUATION SUBJECT:

On Cold-Formed Steel Construction. Light Gauge Steel Engineers Association Washington, D.C Toll Free (866)

The influence of plasterboard clad walls on the structural behaviour of low rise residential buildings

EVALUATION OF DIZAL INC

RUUKKI FORMA DESIGN INSTRUCTION

The Integrity of Compartmentation in Buildings During a Fire

Standards for Testing and Rating Shoring Equipment

FIRE RESISTANCE EXPERT JUDGEMENT REPORT WITH CLASSIFICATION FIRES-JR NURE. Fire resistance shutter with retractable stairs, type LMF

INSULATION RETROFIT DESIGN ENERGY SOLUTIONS CENTRE YUKON GOVERNMENT

research report Fire Resistance Ratings of Load Bearing Steel Stud Walls With Gypsum Wallboard Protection RESEARCH REPORT RP REVISION 2007

The difference is Guidance for the preparation of Deck Manufacturing Schedules

DD CEN/TS 1187: 2012 Test 4

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: COMPOSITE WALL PANELS REPORT HOLDER: CITADEL ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS, INC.

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: SENTINEL FENCE AND RAIL. For: 120 in by 42 in Fully-Welded Aluminum Guardrail Assembly with Intermediate Support Post

REPORT HOLDER: AEROSMITH FASTENING SYSTEMS 5621 DIVIDEND ROAD INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA EVALUATION SUBJECT: AEROSMITH BRAND FASTENERS

FIRE PROTECTION. GTEC Shaftwall systems 244 GTEC Shaftwall Stairwell systems 248 GTEC Horizontal Shaftwall systems 249 GTEC Encasement systems 250

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR METAL PLASTER BASES (LATH) PREFACE

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE XXXX 2015 EXXON QUESTION ANSWER. page 1 of 9

BS 476: Part 6: Method Of Test For Fire Propagation For Products. WF Additional Report Number: Date: 18 th February 2008.

Brick Veneer Walls. Insulation

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Metallic materials Tensile testing Part 2: Method of test at elevated temperature

Fire Barrier Duct Wrap 615+

ESR-2894 Reissued April 2014 This report is subject to renewal April 1, 2016.

GypLyner UNIVERSAL Metal framed wall lining system

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS UNIFORM EVALUATION SERVICES

Gold Bond BRAND Gypsum Sheathing

DIVISION: WOOD, PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES SECTION: SHOP-APPLIED WOOD COATINGS SECTION: SHEATHING REPORT HOLDER:

NU-WALL EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM CLADDING. Installation Specifications Vertical orientation (over cavity)

SECTION GYPSUM BOARD ASSEMBLIES

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: BRICK-IT. SERIES/MODEL: Brick Veneer Panel Systems PRODUCT TYPE: Wall Panel Systems

Installation Guide and Safety Manual

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: ROOFING AND SIDING PANELS REPORT HOLDER: KINGSPAN INSULATED PANELS, INC.

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: METAL ROOF PANELS SECTION: METAL WALL PANELS REPORT HOLDER:

Xtratherm Thin-R Thermal Liner (XT/TL Grade)

REPORT HOLDER: THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY 1501 LARKIN CENTER DRIVE MIDLAND, MICHIGAN EVALUATION SUBJECT:

SECTION GYPSUM BOARD

Evaluation of Full-Scale House Testing Under Lateral Loading

Staggered stud acoustic partition system

BS EN ISO : 1999

AcroWall-ES System. Class PB Exterior Insulation and Finish System providing a primary moisture barrier. Typical Details

SPECIFICATION GUIDELINE

E R0 ACOUSTICAL PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT ASTM E90. Rendered to: PAC INTERNATIONAL, LLC

e x a n g l e installation guide exangle Finishing Sections

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: COMPOSITE WALL PANELS REPORT HOLDER: FUNDERMAX GMBH

SECTION NON-STRUCTURAL METAL FRAMING

exangle installation guide EXANGLE Finishing Sections

The Passive Fire Protection Handbook. Chapter 3: Structural Steel

research report Cold-Formed Steel Walls with Fiberboard Sheathing Shear Wall Testing RESEARCH REPORT RP REVISION 2006

Tehnical Data Sheet Astro Intu Mastic. UIC of product-type: INTUM CPR-JA5015

C10. Longitudinal Shear Reinforcement Design

Technical Assessment Body issuing the ETA: Kiwa Nederland B.V. Sinh Board

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: FIBER CEMENT SIDING REPORT HOLDER: RIEDER FASERBETON ELEMENTE GmbH

ESR-1365 Reissued March 2014 This report is subject to renewal April 1, 2015.

Modelling the seismic response of light-timber-framed buildings

CITY OF CEDAR FALLS DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INSPECTION SERVICES DIVISION PHONE Residential Accessory Structures

AS Residential timber-framed construction Part 2: Non-Cyclonic Areas

Transcription:

TEST REPORT Fire resistance load-bearing test of a 136mm thick Ozone Panels wall system tested in accordance with AS 1530.4 2005. EWFA Report No: 2758400 Report Sponsor: Ozone Panels Level 31, 367 Collins Street Melbourne, VIC 3000 Test Date: 22 nd August 2012

Page 2 of 23 DOCUMENT REVISION STATUS Date Issued Issue No Description 14 th September 2012 2758400.1 Initial Issue CONTACT INFORMATION Exova Warringtonfire Aus Pty Ltd - ABN 81 050 241 524 NATA Registered Laboratory Unit 2, 409-411 Hammond Road Dandenong Victoria 3175 Australia T: +61 (0)3 9767 1000 F: +61 (0)3 9767 1001 New South Wales Suite 2002a, Level 20 Level 20, 44 Market Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia T: +61 (0)2 8270 7600 F: +61 (0)2 9299 6076 Victoria Unit 2, 409-411 Hammond Road Dandenong Victoria 3175 Australia T: +61 (0)3 9767 1000 F: +61 (0)3 9767 1001 Queensland Northpoint, Unit 29, Level 6 231 North Quay Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia T: +61 (0)7 3238 1700 F: +61 (0)7 3211 4833 SIGNATORIES Prepared by Reviewed by M. Kamal Chad McLean GENERAL CONDITIONS OF USE This report may only be reproduced in full without modifications by the report applicant only. Copies, extracts or abridgments of this report in any form shall not be made distributed or published by other organisations or individuals without the permission in writing from a Director of Exova Warringtonfire Aus Pty Ltd.

Page 3 of 23 CONTENTS 1 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 4 Test Assembly 4 Test Specimens 4 Assembly and Installation Methods 4 Orientation 4 2 SCHEDULE OF COMPONENTS 5 3 TEST PROCEDURE 6 Statement of compliance 6 Variations to test method 6 Pre-test conditioning 6 Sampling / Specimen Selection 6 Ambient Temperature 6 Loading 6 Test Duration 6 Instrumentation and Equipment 6 4 TEST MEASUREMENTS 8 Furnace Temperature and Pressure Measurements 8 Specimen Temperatures 8 Observations 8 5 TEST RESULTS 8 6 APPLICATION OF TEST RESULTS 8 Variations from the Tested Specimens 8 Uncertainty of measurement 8 APPENDIX 1 DRAWINGS OF TEST ASSEMBLY 9 APPENDIX 2 TEST OBSERVATIONS 12 APPENDIX 3 DIRECT FIELD OF APPLICATION 13 APPENDIX 4 INSTRUMENTATION POSITIONS 14 APPENDIX 5 TEST DATA 16 A 5.1 Furnace Temperature 16 A 5.2 Furnace Pressure 16 A 5.3 Specimen Temperatures 17 A 5.4 Deflections 20 APPENDIX 6 PHOTOGRAPHS 21

Page 4 of 23 1 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS TEST ASSEMBLY TEST SPECIMENS The test assembly comprised a nominal 3000mm wide 3000mm high 136mm thick loadbearing wall system. The wall was restrained at the top and was supported at the base on the loading jacks. The East and West vertical edges were free from lateral restraint. The test specimen consisted of 120mm thick Ozone Panels comprising of 16mm KRONOPLY OSB/3 wood based boards with 90mm PIR Foam core, with one layer of 16mm Boral Firestop plasterboard on the fire side only. The panel system incorporated timber framing around the perimeter of the wall system. The full description of the specimen is provided in Figures A1.1 to A1.4 and the Schedule of Components in Section 2. ASSEMBLY AND INSTALLATION METHODS ORIENTATION The wall system was constructed by representatives of Ozone Panels on 14 th and 15 th August 2012. The wall system was asymmetrical with the fire grade plasterboard to the exposed side.

Page 5 of 23 2 SCHEDULE OF COMPONENTS Item 1 2 Description Name Specification Density Installation Name Size Specification Density Ozone Panels Panels comprised of 16mm thick (measured) KRONOPLY OSB/3 wood based boards with 90mm thick (measured) PIR Foam core. KRONOPLY OSB/3 = 659kg/m 3 (measured). PIR Foam core = 43.89kg/m 3 (measured). Installed vertically with PIR foam at all edges cutout to accommodate the timber framing around the perimeter and the Ozone panel studs on all internal vertical and horizontal joints Item 2 Ozone Panel studs 90 90mm Panels comprised of 16mm thick (measured) KRONOPLY OSB/3 wood based boards with 58mm thick (measured) PIR Foam core. KRONOPLY OSB/3 = 659kg/m 3 (measured). PIR Foam core = 43.89kg/m 3 (measured). Fitted into grooves cut into the Ozone Panel (Item 1) joints. See figure A.1.1-A1.4 for details. Installation 3 Name Exposed Cladding Product Name Boral Firestop Size 16mm thick Density 794kg/m 3 (measured) Installation Fixed to the exposed side of the Ozone Panels wall with Item 7 at 400mm centres Name Timber Framing (MGP 10) Size 90 45mm A single piece fitted into the grooves made along the 2 vertical edges and the bottom, with a double layer along the head. 4 Installation 5 Name Specification Installation Plasterboard capping 16mm thick 152mm wide Boral Firestop Used to cover the timber framing along the vertical edges and screw (Item 9) fixed to timber framing at 200mm centres.

Page 6 of 23 Item 6 7 8 9 Description Name Product name Installation Name Size Installation Name Size Installation Name Size Installation Sealant HB Fuller Firesound Applied to exposed side cladding joints and Ozone panel joints on fire side only. Fixing 6g 41mm Bugle head Coarse thread screws Fixing the exposed cladding to the Ozone Panels at 400mm centres Fixing 3mm gauge 55mm Ring shift nail Fixing the Ozone panels to Ozone Panel studs at 150mm centres and Ozone panels to timber framing at 100mm centres. Fixing 3.5g 30mm PZ2 Timber screws Fixing the plasterboard capping to the timber framing at 200mm centres 3 TEST PROCEDURE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The test was performed in accordance with the requirements of AS 1530.4-2005 Sections 2 & 3 as appropriate for a load bearing wall. VARIATIONS TO TEST METHOD None PRE-TEST CONDITIONING The construction of the wall was finished on the 15 th August 2012 and was tested on 22 nd August 2012. The specimen was subject to normal laboratory temperatures and conditions. SAMPLING / SPECIMEN SELECTION The laboratory was not involved in the sampling or selection of the test specimen for the fire resistance test. AMBIENT TEMPERATURE The ambient temperature at the start of the test was 20 C and varied between 20-22 C during the test. LOADING The specimen was subjected to a total axial load of 18.996kN for the duration of the test. The load was applied at 6-off single point load locations at 600mm centres to the bottom edge of the wall. The applied load at each hydraulic jack was 3.07kN, which also allowed 2.9kN for the weight of the wall and a 3% increase in load for accuracy. TEST DURATION The test duration was 85 minutes. INSTRUMENTATION AND EQUIPMENT The instrumentation was provided in accordance with AS 1530.4-2005 and as detailed below: The furnace temperature was measured by 6-off mineral insulated metal sheathed Type K thermocouples with wire diameters not greater than 1mm and overall diameter of 3mm with the measuring junction insulated from the sheath. The thermocouples protruded a minimum of 25mm from steel supporting tubes. The non-fire side specimen temperatures as well as some internal specimen temperatures were measured by Type K thermocouples with wire diameters less than 0.5mm diameter soldered to 12mm diameter 0.2mm thick copper discs covered by 30mm 30mm 2.0 mm

Page 7 of 23 inorganic insulating pads. The thermocouple positions are described in Table A4.1, and are shown on Figure A4.1 in Appendix 4. A roving thermocouple was available to measure temperatures at positions that appeared hotter than the positions monitored by the fixed thermocouples. The furnace pressure was measured at approximately 500mm above the floor of the furnace. Gap gauges were available during the test to assess the performance under the criteria for integrity. The load was applied at nominal 600mm centres directly below each stud with hydraulic jacks, via 100mm 100mm steel pads with pin support conditions. The loading equipment was capable of measuring the load applied within an accuracy of ± 2.5% of the test load. Deflection measurements were taken from calibrated tapes fixed to the specimen using a Telescope Levelling Instrument (Dumpy Level) Model 200B, at the positions shown on Figure A4.1 in Appendix 4.

Page 8 of 23 4 TEST MEASUREMENTS FURNACE TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS Furnace temperature and pressure data are provided in Figure A5.1 and Table A5.2 in Appendix 5. SPECIMEN TEMPERATURES OBSERVATIONS Specimen temperature data is provided in A5.3 and Table A5.1 in Appendix 5. A table that includes observations of the significant behaviour of the specimen and details of the occurrence of the various performance criteria specified in AS 1530.4-2005 is provided in Appendix 2. Photographs of the specimen are included in Appendix 6. 5 TEST RESULTS The specimen tested achieved the following performance with respect to the performance criteria listed in AS 1530.4-2005, Section 2 & 3. Criteria Structural Adequacy Integrity Insulation Result No Failure FRL 60/60/60 Failure at 81minutes Failure at 77 minutes 6 APPLICATION OF TEST RESULTS TEST LIMITATIONS The results of this fire test may be used to directly assess fire hazard, but it should be recognized that a single test method will not provide a full assessment of fire hazard under all fire conditions. The results only relate to the behaviour of the specimen of the element of the construction under the particular conditions of the test; they are not intended to be the sole criteria for assessing the potential fire performance of the element in use nor do they necessarily reflect the actual behaviour in fires. VARIATIONS FROM THE TESTED SPECIMENS This report details the methods of construction, the test conditions and the results obtained when the specific element of construction described herein was tested following the procedure outlined in AS1530.4. Any significant variation with respect to size, constructional details, loads, stresses, edge or end conditions, other than those allowed under the field of direct application in the relevant test method, is not addressed by this report. It is recommended that any proposed variation to the tested configuration other than as permitted under the field of direct application specified in Appendix 3 should be referred to the test sponsor in the first instance to obtain appropriate documentary evidence of compliance from Exova Warringtonfire Aus Pty Ltd or another Registered Testing Authority. UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT Because of the nature of fire resistance testing and the consequent difficulty in quantifying the uncertainty of measurement of fire resistance, it is not possible to provide a stated degree of accuracy of the result.

Page 9 of 23 APPENDIX 1 DRAWINGS OF TEST ASSEMBLY Figure A1.1: Elevation of Test Specimen (Unexposed side)

Page 10 of 23 Figure A1.2: Elevation of Test Specimen (Exposed side)

Page 11 of 23 Figure A1.3: Vertical cross section A-A

Page 12 of 23 Figure A1.4: Horizontal cross section B-B APPENDIX 2 TEST OBSERVATIONS The following include observations of the significant behaviour of the specimen. Note: All observations are from the unexposed face unless otherwise stated. Time Min Sec Observation -15 00 Test load applied. 0 00 Fire resistance test commence and ambient temperature was 20 C. 16 00 Smoke emissions had become evident at the bottom edge of the specimen. 16 30 Smoke emissions had become evident on the bottom horizontal joint on west side. 30 00 Specimen had continued to maintain integrity and insulation in accordance with AS 1530.4-2005. 37 00 Smoke emissions had become evident on the west vertical edge of the specimen. Increased smoke emissions on the bottom edge and bottom horizontal edge had become evident. 42 26 More smoke emissions had become evident from the top edge of the specimen at the centre. 45 00 Smoke emissions had become evident on the west horizontal joint on the specimen. 50 00 Reduction in volume of smoke from across the specimen had become evident. 60 00 Specimen had continued to maintain integrity and insulation in accordance with AS 1530.4-2005. 66 00 Slight discolouration on the specimen in the path of the smoke. 77 00 A 90 second roving thermocouple test was carried out near the aperture that had become evident towards the centre of the specimen, resulting in a temperature of 250 C. Failure on insulation in accordance with AS 1530.4-2005, clause 2.12.3(b), where the temperature exceeded the initial temperature by more than 180 C 80 00 Another aperture had become evident on the surface of the wall approximately 300mm below the first aperture. 81 00 Flaming at the aperture towards the centre of the specimen had become evident. Failure on integrity in accordance with AS 1530.4-2005, clause 2.12.2.4, due to sustained flaming on the non-exposed side for greater than 10 seconds. 83 00 Two more apertures had become evident on the surface of the wall. 85 00 Test terminated at the request of the sponsor.

Page 13 of 23 APPENDIX 3 DIRECT FIELD OF APPLICATION GENERAL AS 1530.4-2005 states that the results of a fire resistance test on a wall are directly applicable without reference to the testing authority, to similar constructions where one or more of the following changes are made provided no individual component is removed or reduced: SEPARATING ELEMENTS a) An increase in thickness of the wall is permitted.

Page 14 of 23 APPENDIX 4 INSTRUMENTATION POSITIONS 016 017 011 019 012 SC 013 021 018 FE 014 020 015 y VW VC VE x Figure A4.1: Unexposed surface thermocouple locations. Note: The green dots indicate deflection locations

Page 15 of 23 Table A 4.1 Thermocouple Locations Location Qtr points Other Surface T/C No. x y Description 011 742 2250 Upper West quarter point 012 2228 2250 Upper East quarter point 013 1485 1500 Centre of specimen 014 742 750 Lower West quarter point 015 2228 750 Lower East quarter point 016 1485 2975 At the head of the specimen at mid-width 017 1770 2975 Top of vertical stud 018 2870 1500 Mid-height of the free edge, 100mm from the edge 019 1770 2250 15mm from stud and nogging joint 020 1485 740 15mm from a horizontal joint 021 1770 1500 15mm from a vertical joint Table A 4.2 Deflection Locations Part of specimen Ref. x y Description Horizontal SC 1470 1500 Centre point of the specimen FE 2870 1485 Mid-height of the east free edge, 50mm from the edge. VE 2870 100 East base of the wall Vertical VC 1485 100 Centre base of the wall VW 50 100 West base of the wall

Page 16 of 23 APPENDIX 5 TEST DATA A 5.1 FURNACE TEMPERATURE Figure A5.1: Furnace Temperatures vs. time A 5.2 FURNACE PRESSURE Time (minutes) Pressure (Pa) Avg Time (minutes) Pressure (Pa) Avg 5-10 2 45-50 1 10-15 1 50-55 2 15-20 -2 55-60 0 20-25 -1 60-65 0 25-30 -1 65-70 -1 30-35 -1 70-75 -2 35-40 1 75-80 0 40-45 2 80-85 0

Page 17 of 23 A 5.3 SPECIMEN TEMPERATURES Figure A5.2: Quarter point and centre on unexposed face. Temperatures vs. time Figure A5.3: Average of Quarter point and centre on unexposed face. Temperatures vs. Time

Page 18 of 23 Figure A5.4: Other Surface - Head, Free-edge, horizontal and vertical joins. Temperatures vs. time

Page 19 of 23 Table A5.1: Test Specimen Temperatures Location T/C No. Description 2 Temp ( C) at t (minutes) Limit (Mins) 1 t=0 t=30 t=60 t=85 011 Upper West quarter point 21 21 21 62-012 Upper East quarter point 20 27 34 94 - Qtr points 013 Centre of specimen 20 21 21 56-014 Lower West quarter point 20 25 33 65-015 Lower East quarter point 20 20 21 71 - Quarter point average 20 23 26 69-016 At the head of the specimen at mid-width 19 20 28 46-017 Top of vertical stud 19 33 38 43 - Other surface 018 Mid-height of the free edge, 100mm from the 20 20 24 30 edge - 019 15mm from stud and nogging joint 20 48 59 83-020 15mm from a horizontal joint 20 27 39 51-021 15mm from a vertical joint 20 24 40 58 - Notes 1 2 3 Limit time is the time to the nearest whole minute, rounded down to the nearest minute, at which the temperature recorded by the thermocouple does not rise by more than 180K above the initial temperature. Limit time is the time to the nearest whole minute, rounded down to the nearest minute, at which the average temperature recorded by the thermocouples does not rise by more than 140K above the initial temperature. Refer to Appendix 4 for locations of thermocouples as only a generic description is included in the table. No insulation failure prior to thermocouple failure. - Under Limit column indicates the temperature limit was not exceeded during the test period or up until the time of integrity failure if a failure occurred. NA Under Limit column indicates that the temperature limit criteria are Not Applicable for these thermocouple locations. # Thermocouple failure

Page 20 of 23 A 5.4 DEFLECTIONS Figure A5.5: Specimen Deflection of the wall vs. Time. (Horizontal Deflection) Positive measurements show movement of the wall towards the furnace Note: Some data is not available because of excessive smoke emissions Figure A5.6 Specimen Deflection of the wall vs. Time (Vertical Deflection) Positive measurements show movement of the base of the wall upwards Note: Some data is not available because of excessive smoke emissions

Page 21 of 23 APPENDIX 6 PHOTOGRAPHS Figure A6.1. Unexposed face of specimen before commencement of the fire-resistance test. Figure A6.2. Exposed face of specimen before commencement of the fire-resistance test.

Page 22 of 23 Figure A6.3. Unexposed face of specimen at the end of the test

Page 23 of 23 Figure A6.4 Exposed face of specimen at the end of the test