Gasification of Australian and North Dakota Lignites in a Pressurised Fluidized Bed Gasification Process Development Unit

Similar documents
Brown Coal and Biomass Gasification Research at Monash University Chemical Engineering

ATTRITION OF LIGNITE CHAR DURING FLUIDIZED BED GASIFICATION: EXPERIMENTAL AND MODELING STUDIES. Paola Ammendola and Fabrizio Scala

High efficient multi-fuel CYMIC concept for biomass, rejects and coal for Hamburger Hungaria Katriina Jalkanen Valmet Technologies Oy

WRI S PRE GASIFICATION TREATMENT OF PRB COALS FOR IMPROVED ADVANCED CLEAN COAL GASIFIER DESIGN

Three-dimensional modelling of steam-oxygen gasification in a circulating fluidized bed

EXPERIENCE WITH ATMOSPHERIC FLUIDIZED BED GASIFICATION OF SWITCHGRASS. Jerod Smeenk and Robert C. Brown

Testing and Feasibility Study of an Indirectly Heated Fluidized-Bed Coal Gasifier

PRODUCTION OF SYNGAS BY METHANE AND COAL CO-CONVERSION IN FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR

IMPACT OF OPERATING CONDITIONS ON SO 2 CAPTURE IN A SUPERCRITICAL CFB BOILER IN POLAND

Design, Construction, and Commissioning of a Pilot-Scale Dual Fluidized Bed System for CO 2 Capture

Hamm MW Pyrolysis Plant. Integrated Pyrolysis into Power Plant Plant capacity 100,000 t/a Pre-processed Waste Materials

Development status of the EAGLE Gasification Pilot Plant

Application of CFB (Circulating Fluidized Bed) to Sewage Sludge Incinerator

Steam Gasification of Low Rank Fuel Biomass, Coal, and Sludge Mixture in A Small Scale Fluidized Bed

Lignite Properties and Boiler Performance

Pyrolysis and Gasification

Gasification of lignite coal in North America; Past experience and future opportunities

Experience of Operating a Small Pilot-Scale Oxy-Fuel CFB Test Rig

Attrition of limestone during calcium looping cycles for CO 2 capture in fluidized bed

Development of Foster Wheeler s Vision 21 Partial Gasification Module

Synthesis Gas Production from Biomass

Coupling gasification and metallurgical applications

Fluidized-bed gasification of high-ash South African coals: An experimental and modelling study

BLUE OPTION White space is filled with one or more photos

WRITECoal Gasification of Low- Rank Coals for Improved Advanced Clean Coal Gasifier / IGCC Design

Gas Yields from Coal Devolatilization in a Bench-Scale Fluidized Bed Reactor

Design and Operation of Biomass Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler with High Steam Parameter

REMOVAL OF RESIDUAL CHAR FINES FROM PYROLYSIS VAPORS BY HOT GAS FILTRATION

Fundamental oxy-fuel combustion research carried out within the ENCAP project

THE CHALMERS GASIFIER

Conversion of Biomass Particles

Oxy-fuel combustion integrated with a CO 2 processing unit

- The Osaki CoolGen Project -

FLUIDIZED BED GASIFICATION OF MARINE MICROALGAE IN A SPOUTED BED REACTOR

Allothermal Gasification for Indirect Co-Firing

STEAM GASIFICATION OF LOW RANK COAL CHARS IN A THERMOBALANCE REACTOR AND A FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR

LARGE-SCALE PRODUCTION OF FISCHER-TROPSCH DIESEL FROM BIOMASS

Effect of Flue Gas Recirculation on the Formation of Fine Particulate Matter in a Domestic Pellet-Fired Boiler

MEGA-GSP GSP PROCESS. International Freiberg Conference on IGCC & XtL Technologies June 16-18, FUTURE ENERGY GmbH, Germany.

ScienceDirect. Oxyfuel combustion in a bubbling fluidized bed combustor

Performance of CLOU process in the combustion of different types of coal with CO 2 capture

Ash agglomeration in the modified COORVED gasifier

CZESTOCHOWA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Catalytic Activated Ceramic Dust Filter a new technology for combined removal of dust, NOx, dioxin, VOCs and acids from off gases.

Causticizing Aspects and Sulfur Recovery in Black Liquor Gasification. Low Temperature Gasification

Progress in Modelling of IGCC Components

ALLOTHERMAL GASIFICATION for CO-FIRING

C S Bhutoria. Mob: Presented in 7 th International ti Conference Gasification India: 2016 at New Delhi

FINEX - AN OLD VISION OF THE IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY BECOMES REALITY*

A PROMISING POWER OPTION -- THE FERCO SILVAGAS BIOMASS GASIFICATION PROCESS OPERATING EXPERIENCE AT THE BURLINGTON GASIFIER

A new HP version of Lurgi s FBDBTM gasifier is bringing more value to clients

Experiences from Commissioning and Test Operation of Vattenfall s Oxyfuel Pilot Plant

CO 2 Capture and Storage: Options and Challenges for the Cement Industry

Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants

Pulverised Coal Pyrolysis and Char Combustion Characteristics in Simulated Air (O 2 /N 2 ) and Oxy-fuel (O 2 /CO 2 ) Conditions

UPDATE ON THE KEMPER COUNTY IGCC PROJECT Gasification Technologies Conference

Chapter 2.6: FBC Boilers

Role of Gasification in a Bio-Based Future

Author: Andrea Milioni Chemical Engineer On Contract Cooperator University UCBM Rome (Italy)

Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste

Biosolids to Energy- Stamford, CT

Advanced Processes Analysis and Control Methods for CFB Power Plants Project Overview

Lurgi s MPG Gasification plus Rectisol Gas Purification Advanced Process Combination for Reliable Syngas Production

Refinery Residue Based IGCC Power Plants and Market Potential

Emissions from wood-fuelled equipment. Senior research scientist Heikki Oravainen Technical Research Centre of Finland

Coal based IGCC technology

Comparison of a New Warm-Gas Desulfurization Process versus Traditional Scrubbers for a Commercial IGCC Power Plant

Smart CHP from Biomass and Waste

ADECOS II. Advanced Development of the Coal-Fired Oxyfuel Process with CO 2 Separation

Modelling and Simulation of a Coal-fired Supercritical Power Plant Integrated to a CO 2 Capture Plant

Thermal Conversion of Animal Manure to Biofuel. Outline. Biorefinery approaches

HTW Fluidized-bed Gasification for 400 MW IGCC Power Plant, Vresova - Czech republic.

The MILENA gasification technology for the production of Bio-Methane

Kazushige KUROSAWA*, Zhibao ZHANG**, and Zhengbing WANG** [Delivered Products & Systems] 1. Introduction. 2. Overview of Nanjing

Biomass Power Plants

Efficient Technologies for Down Stream Gasification Process and Integration with IGCC Power Production

The Progress of Osaki CoolGen Project

S.E. (Chemical) (First Semester) EXAMINATION, 2012 PROCESS CALCULATIONS (2008 PATTERN) Time : Three Hours Maximum Marks : 100

CO2 Capture with Foster Wheeler s Flexi-burn TM CFB Technology

Focus on Gasification in the Western U.S.

FRANCE S BIGGEST BIOMASS CHP PLANT

Flue Gas Particle Characterization at Different Parts of the Power Plant

Hydrogen Sulphide and Mercaptan Removal

WHITE PLUME REMOVAL USING FUEL ADDITIVES IN THERMAL POWER PLANTS

CHAR REACTIVITY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS. *J.M. Steer, R. Marsh, M. Greenslade ECCRIA 2016

Physical Properties of C & S Filter Coal (Anthracite)

Laboratory Investigations of the Electrical Resistivity of Cokes and Smelting Charge for Optimizing Operation in Large Ferrochrome Furnaces

Co-combustion in fluidised bed influence of K, Cl and S

Modeling Biomass Gasification in a Fluidized Bed Reactor

POWER PLANT- BOILER OPERATIONS SIMULATOR

Mikko Hupa Åbo Akademi Turku, Finland

Assembly and Testing of an On-Farm Manure to Energy Conversion BMP for Animal Waste Pollution Control

Click here to return to Contents Page Coal gasification pilot plant for hydrogen production. Part A: coal gasification and syngas desulphurization

Comparison of combustion characteristics of Petcoke and Indian sub bituminous coal in a CFB Test facility

High efficiency electricity production from SRF/REF through gasification. Malmö Vesa Helanti

Clean energy, natural solutions. Understanding rice husk as a biomass fuel

Paper Mill Repowering with Gasification

Technology Development Partner

GASIFICATION: gas cleaning and gas conditioning

SOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN

Transcription:

Gasification of Australian and North Dakota Lignites in a Pressurised Fluidized Bed Gasification Process Development Unit Sankar Bhattacharya Ian Beaupeurt Malcolm McIntosh

PLANT SCHEMATIC Gas Cooler N 2 Flue Gas Dried Coal Fuel Gas N 2 N 2 Clean Fuel Gas N 2 Steam (4 levels) Air/O2 (5 levels) Feed Rate: 250 Kg/hr Max. Pressure:10 bar Max. Bed Temperature:1000 o C modifications by the PDU team sampling points

PROCESS DEVELOPMENT UNIT Gasifier Incinerator Coal entry Steam generator

PLANT SERVICES COOLING TOWER GAS ANALYSIS AIR M COAL PDU GASIFIER FLARE SCRUBBER BOILER N2

COLD MODEL 1:1

BROAD OBJECTIVES Data on gasification of Victorian and SA lignites - scant Generate engineering data for design of gasification based power systems Generate data for development / validation of gasifier mathematical models Generate data to compare with those generated using laboratory rigs & instruments Provide other data as appropriate to the needs of advanced power generation process bed level control particle size/moisture restriction - flow through the lock hoppers assess agglomeration

TEST PROGRAM Victorian lignites Loy Yang Morwell Yallourn Mixed - 80% Loy Yang, 20% Yallourn, commercially procured Char - from Yallourn lignite, commercially procured Mixed briquetted coal - Gruss 80% Loy Yang, 20% Yallourn, commercially procured South Australian lignite Lochiel - with and without dolomite/limestone North American lignite - as part of the CAP program Falkirk Freedom with and without dolomite Steam-air gasification Steam-oxygen (enriched air) gasification first time attempted

FUEL PROPERTIES Lochiel LoyYang Morwell Yallourn Char Moisture, % 60.3 59 59 62.0 7.1 Ultimate, dry basis, %wt Carbon 58.2 67.8 67.1 65.4 92.4 Hydrogen 4.4 4.7 4.5 4.3 0.80 Nitrogen 0.52 0.66 0.63 0.56 0.70 Oxygen 18.2 25.4 24.1 26.7 1.9 Sulfur 3.5 0.30 0.36 0.22 0.23 Ash 15.2 1.10 3.32 2.76 4.0 Sodium 1.02 0.065 0.079 0.067 0.12 Chlorine 0.50 0.06 0.04 0.05 0.02 Particle Size Lignites: 900 µm mean size, 30-42% below 350 µm; coarser sieved feed Char: 2 mm mean size

INSTALLED CAPACITY -2001 NT WA SA QLD VIC: 6400 of 7800 MW 66 mt coal SA : 760 of 3100 MW 3.3 mt coal NSW source: ESAA 2002 VIC TAS

ENGINEERING DATA - 1 Gas yield/composition and C-conversion as a function of p, t and other variables target C-conversion >85% target LHV : no less than 4 Mj/kg (~95 Btu/SCF) optimise temperature & reactant concentration at fixed pressures - for each coal Elutriation and loss of fines assess elutriation levels control fine fraction in feed coal hydrodynamics in riser/recirc loop - freeboard gas, purge, pulse frequency and quantity control of bed C (bed material)

ENGINEERING DATA - 2 Product gas CO, H 2, CH 4, C 2 H 6, >C 2 H y, CO 2, N 2 NH 3 (in gas and condensate), HCN COS, H 2 S, CS 2 Alkali level in gas and Control Control of NH 3 and H 2 S Tar Condensate - Na, Ca, Mg, Cl, S =, TOC, phenols (2/3 methyl, dimethyl/ethyl) Assess agglomeration propensity long-term tests control additive (simultaneous control of NH 3 and H 2 S) bed drainage solid samples - TMA, XRD and Quantitative X-ray Mapping

TEST PROGRAM 11 commissioning/recommissioning tests - with YL char and various coals test the full P/T/feed rate capabilities bed level maintenance Actual tests - 77 successful attempts in total total gasification hours ~400 51 air-blown tests 3-8 bar, A/F ~1.8-2.5, steam/f ~0.2-0.4 750-900C average bed temperature up to 950C freeboard temperature 26 O2-blown tests (concentration of O 2 up to 35%w of total inlet gas - steam, air, purge nitrogen) 8 bar, ~760-900C average bed temperature duration of test: 3-32 hrs

TYPICAL PROCESS DATA - 1 1000 70 900 Average Bed & Freeboard Temperatures [ C] 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 Avg Bed Temp Avg Frbd Temp CO conc H2 conc CH4 conc Tot Combust Tot Stm Flow Bed Level 60 50 40 30 20 10 Combustible Concentrations (CO,H2,CH4, Total) [%] Total Steam Flow [kg/h], Bed Level [%] 100 RUN NO 55 0 10:48:00 11:18:00 11:48:00 12:18:00 12:48:00 13:18:00 13:48:00 14:18:00 14:48:00 15:18:00 15:48:00 16:18:00 16:48:00 17:18:00 17:48:00 0 Time [hrs]

TYPICAL PROCESS DATA - 2 900 16 Gas Flow [kg/h], System Pressure [kpa], HGF Temperature [ C] 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 Sys Flow Sys Press HGF Temp HGF In Temp HGF dp A/F Ratio Superf Vel RUN NO 55 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 HGF dp [kpa], Air/Fuel, Superficial Velocity [m/s] 0 0 11:30:00 12:00:00 12:30:00 13:00:00 13:30:00 14:00:00 14:30:00 15:00:00 15:30:00 16:00:00 16:30:00 17:00:00 17:30:00 Time [hrs]

RESULTS : C-conversion C-conversion : 75-87% for VIC lignites, 75-83% for Lochiel higher C-conversion with coarser feed and/or Gruss up to 3% point increase during O 2 -runs Factors affecting C-conversion coal type (reactivity, attrition resistance) concentration of fines (<100 micron) in feed coal elutriation of fines, originally present in coal and fines generated due to attrition/reaction coal feed rate and reactant (steam, oxygen) concentration, P, T bed drainage - bed level control- a must for FB gasifiers recirculation of fines - cyclone efficiency, pulsing and purge in recirc leg low ash coals - C-conversion limited by elutriation high ash coals - C-conversion limited by elutriation and bed drainage Higher C-conversion expected with coarser coal feed and double/more efficient cyclone increased residence time/taller gasifier - work in progress with CSIRO

RESULTS: Fuel gas No tar observed during steady state measurement period Gas composition (VIC and SA lignites) - as measured air-blown 11-15% H 2, 10-20% CO, 0.7-2.5% CH 4, ~1% C 2 H y, 10-16% H 2 O 2.7-4.1 MJ/kg (65-97 BTU/scf) LHV up to 1600 ppm NH 3, 100 ppm HCN, 100 ppm COS ~3000 ppm H 2 S (Lochiel coal) without dolomite, <50 ppm with dolomite (Ca/S molar ratio = 2) no detectable sulphides during Victorian lignite based tests use of dolomite also reduced NH3 levels by ~50% O 2 -blown (O 2 - enriched air) 15-24% H 2, 15-24% CO, 1-4%CH 4, >1% C 2 H y 10-18% H 2 O 3.5-5.6 MJ/kg (71-133 BTU/scf) LHV higher levels, up to 1800 ppm NH3, than air-blown tests all alkali in char or filter fines

RESULTS : Fuel gas Fuel gas LHV, as measured, is combustible Gas composition during short and long duration tests similar Tests with freeboard O 2 and steam, and steam distribution total combustibles (CO, CH 4, C 2 H y, H 2 ) increased fines elutriation decreased slightly C-conversion improved no effect of steam distribution in bed PDU units large surface/volume ratio - large heat loss, large air/fuel ratio cooling effect from large quantities of air/n2 purge low bed height Fuel gas LHV from larger/taller units will be higher, as these will allow higher freeboard temperature (less wall effects) longer residence time with deeper bed, and expanded freeboard higher O 2 concentration in the feed reactants use of recirculated fuel/flue gas instead of N 2

OTHER OBSERVATIONS Fines from Attrition/reaction: 6-8% of the coal feed Combustion tests on filter fines in a pf environment 3-4 secs, 1100C and 1250 C, 20% excess air burnout >99% at 1250C only 5-20% of the original water-soluble form of the alkaline metals (Na, Ca, Mg) present in fines Char morphology Porous inside, but fused on the surface

STRATEGIES: for stable operation, reduce fouling/agglomeration Lochiel lignite require Dolomite (rather than the limestone tested) for control of H 2 S and bed fouling bed temperature < 800C, while freeboard temperature ~ 850C by O 2 -injection improve C-conversion and gas composition continuous bed drainage ( up to 6% of solid feed) necessary to maintain bed level and bed renewal, as this lignite has high ash content relative to VIC lignites Victorian lignites bed temperature ~ 900C, while freeboard temperature ~ 950C by O 2 -injection to improve C-conversion and gas composition small continuous bed drainage (1-2% of solid feed) necessary to maintain bed level and bed stability during long-duration tests Ensure steady coal feed to have stable bed level moisture content up to 18% for steady feeding exclude the woody and fines fraction during coal preparation

STRATEGIES: Woody/lump in coal feed

OPERATING ISSUES Fouling - sintered deposits in bed, light and brittle Range of rates 0.05-0.9 kg/run for coal feed 130-200 kg/hr XRD : mainly sulfates, silicates, but trace Sodalite and Halites TMA: low temperature compounds 800-850C

COLLABORATIVE PROJECT WITH USDOE/UNDEERC tests in HTW PDU Freedom and Falkirk - after dried to ~15% moisture Air-blown and O 2 -enriched air blown gasification 8 bar pressure, total of 8 tests 4 hours at steady state Severe bed agglomeration and freeboard fouling during preliminary tests when tested at a bed temperature of around 900C Average bed temperature 800-830C to prevent bed agglomeration, and freeboard temperature below 900C to prevent freeboard fouling C-conversion - 75-83%, limited by the need to continuously drain the bed material to maintain bed level and bed stability Gas composition - as measured 10-12% CO, 10-14% H 2, ~1% CH 4, ~15% H 2 O up to 4000 ppm NH3 (much higher than VIC lignites) and 1000 ppm H 2 S without dolomite with dolomite at Ca/S = 2 (molar), H 2 S was below detection limit, and NH 3 was around 1000 ppm

COLLABORATIVE PROJECT WITH USDOE/UNDEERC tests in Transport Gasifier at UNDEERC - preliminary data Objective : preliminary tests to assess the performance of two Australian lignites in a Transport gasifier Raw coal sent, dried locally at the EERC 8 bar, ~ 200 kg/hr, air and O 2 blown Lochiel (with dolomite) - 740-760C Loy Yang coal - 800-880C not necessarily under optimized conditions Tests in progress

COLLABORATIVE PROJECT WITH USDOE/UNDEERC tests in Transport Gasifier at UNDEERC - preliminary data C -conversion 77-83% for Loy Yang coal 72-74% for Lochiel coal low values due to too much fines in the feed and cyclone problems Pilot plant at PSDF - Wilsonville produces higher C-conversion over that attained at the EERC (smaller) gasifier tests resume with coarser feed Dry gas composition Loy Yang 18% H2, 12% CO, 4% CH4, 18% CO2, 47% N2 - air blown 26% H2, 17% CO, 8.6% CH4, 40% CO2, 8% N2 - O2 blown Lochiel 13% H2, 10% CO, 3% CH4, 19.5% CO2, 55% N2 - air blown 33% H2, 12% CO, 8.4% CH4, 39% CO2, 7.4% N2 - O2 blown