Lafayette College Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Similar documents
Lecture 6: Softening

REMOVAL OF HARDNESS BY PRECIPITATION

Hard water. Hard and Soft Water. Hard water. Hard water 4/2/2012

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Hardness. Concentration is. What s the concentration of red triangles? What s in your pipes? 500 ml

DRAFT July 26, Engineer s Report Water Softening Alternatives for Boyack Road Water Treatment Plant. Town of Clifton Park, New York

Solubility Equi librium Ksp. Chapter 17 Sections

A Cost Effective Technique for Chemical Wastes Reduction in Lime Water Softening Process

SOLUBILITY STUDY GUIDE- Multiple Choice Section

CHLOR-ALKALI INDUSTRY

Solubility Equi librium Ksp. Chapter 17 Sections


Geology 627, Hydrogeology Review questions for final exam h t 1/ 2

Some Basic Concepts of Chemistry

AP*Chemistry Solubility Equilibria

ICSE-Science 2 (Chemistry) 2004

1. Scaling. H.O.: H-5/21, KRISHNA NAGAR, DELHI Tel.: , Fax:

Treatment Technologies

TYPES OF CHEMICAL REACTIONS PART I INTRODUCTION

Interpretation of Chemistry Data from Seepage, Observation Well, and Reservoir Water Samples collected at Horsetooth Dam during July 2004

1. Which of the given statements about the reaction below are incorrect?

Sulfate Reducing Bioreactor for Sulfate, Metals and TDS Removal

Solutions Unit Exam Name Date Period

ph Management and Lime Material Selection and Application

2.4 Period 3. Na Mg Al Si P S Cl Ar

Corrosion and Odor Control in Wastewater Systems

Water Quality. CE 370 Lecture 1. Global Distribution of Earth s s Water

IWC ZLD: New Silica Based Inhibitor Chemistry Permits Cost Effective Water Conservation for HVAC and Industrial Cooling Towers

Compounds & Reactions Week 1. Writing Formulas & Balancing Equations. Write the chemical formula for each molecular (covalent) compound.

Water Chemistry. Water 101

5-4 Chemical changes Trilogy

MR. D HR UV AS HE R I.C.S.E. BOA RD PAP ER ICSE

Today! Demonstrations of Redox Chemistry! Electrochemistry! electrons moving about! equilibrium with a control knob! The disappearing Aluminum Rod!

Acid Rock Drainage (ARD) Inhibition by Sulfite Used as Part of the Inco Process for Cyanide Removal

Gypsum Solubility Simulating Real World Aqueous Problems

Soda Ash ( Sodium carbonate) Manufacture

Suggest one reason why spoons are electroplated. ... Why is hydrogen produced at the negative electrode and not sodium?

(3) The compound boron nitride (BN) has a high melting point (2967 ºC), high density, and is very hard. What is the best classification of this solid?

Unit 3 - Solubility Practice Test # 2

SRI RAMAKRISHNA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY COIMBATORE First Year BE/B.TECH ( ) Engineering Chemistry- I

DW Module 21: Chemical Addition Answer Key- Revised Oct 2015

Alternatives for addressing chloride in wastewater effluent

SPE Abstract. Copyright 2012, Society of Petroleum Engineers

Periodic Trends and the Properties of Elements The Alkaline Earth Metals

By C.F. Chubb Michaud, CWS-VI

Nadeem Shakir Qatar Petroleum. The 2nd Joint Qatar Japan Environmental Symposium, QP JCCP The 21st Joint GCC Japan Environmental Symposium

Biological Nutrient Removal vs. Chemical Nutrient Removal

Solubility Product Constant Lab Calcium Hydroxide Results

TDS AND SLUDGE GENERATION IMPACTS FROM USE OF CHEMICALS IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Flue Gas Desulphurization (FGD) plant 2 x 600 MW Coal based Thermal power plant Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu. By MK Parameswaran 23 rd Dec, 2016

Periodic Trends and the Properties of Elements

KKB Micro Testing Labs Pvt. Ltd., , 2 nd Floor, Tarun Plaza, NFC Main Road, Krishna Nagar Colony, Moula Ali, Hyderabad, Telangana

0 50 Very soft Soft Medium Hard

Understanding Water Quality Parameters for Citrus Irrigation and Drainage Systems 1

MILAF: INTEGRAL MANAGEMENT OF ARSENICAL SLUDGE, TREATMENT AND RECOVERY OF BY-PRODUCTS OF ACID WATERS FROM SMELTER PLANTS

Evaluation of Alternate Process Chemistries for the Removal of Arsenic and Fluoride from Industrial Wastewater

Chapter 18 Homework Answers

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You

2015 O LEVEL CHEMISTRY 5073/02

JSUNIL TUTORIAL, SAMASTIPUR

EQUILIBRIUM PRACTICE TEST

USE OF CHEMICALS TO CONTROL ODORS AND CORROSION IN WASTEWATER SYSTEMS

Price List. Prices valid until 31 December 2016

CRHS Academic Chemistry Unit 1 Matter and Change HOMEWORK. Due Date Assignment On-Time (100) Late (70)

The Use of Magnesium Hydroxide Slurry as a Safe and Cost Effective Solution for H 2 S Odor, Corrosion, and FOG in Sanitary Sewer Systems

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO GUIDE 34:2009

X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY: DEVELOPMENT OF EFFECTIVE FUSION PROCEDURES FOR LIME PRODUCTS

Hybrid RO & Softening Birjand Water Treatment Plant

Distribution Review. Corrosion Control. Corrosion Control Vocabulary. American Water College 1. Corrosion Control Training Objectives

The Carbon cycle. Atmosphere, terrestrial biosphere and ocean are constantly exchanging carbon

*20GSD5201* Double Award Science: Chemistry. Unit C2 Higher Tier TUESDAY 9 JUNE 2015, AFTERNOON [GSD52] *GSD52* *G5802* TIME 1 hour 15 minutes.

Federal Environmental Agency, June 2001

URS Corporation (URS) conducted a

look down at cross on paper paper cross on paper

Test sticks and test papers for semi-quantitative determinations

Subsurface Drip Irrigation Systems (SDI) Water Quality Assessment Guidelines

UNIT-I WATER TECHNOLOGY

INDIAN SCHOOL MUSCAT SENIOR SECTION DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY CLASS X- PRACTICAL WORKSHEET

Electrochemistry Written Response

Carbon Dioxide, Alkalinity and ph

Laboratory # 1. Measurement of Water Quality Parameters

BENCH-SCALE TESTING OF SEAWATER DESALINATION USING NANOFILTRATION

Kirill Ukhanov, GE Water & Process Technologies, Russia, describes how advanced membrane technology is helping a Russian refinery to meet stringent

[ Cl ] - [[Mg 2+ ] ] Experiment 7: Oxidation-Reduction Reactions. transfer e -

MAKING SOLID SOLUTIONS WITH ALKALI HALIDES (AND BREAKING THEM) John B. Brady

1. What volume of water is required to make a 4.65 M solution from 5.2 g of NaBr (MM = g/mol)?

Boiling point in C. Colour in aqueous solution. Fluorine 188 colourless. Chlorine 35 pale green. Bromine X orange.

Carbon Dioxide, Alkalinity and ph

BLUEBERRY IRRIGATION WATER QUALITY

Does Water Quality Make A Difference in the Performance of A Pesticide?

Pretreatment of Industrial Wastewater for ZLD/Resources Recovery

Periodic Trends. Introduction

Chapter 12 Reactivity of Metals 12.1 Different Reactivities of Metals Recall an experiment performed in F.3

Selective Removal Of Sodium And Chloride? Mono-Valent Selective Ion Exchange Membrane For Desalination And Reuse Enhancement.

General Stabilization Methods

OCN 201 Chemical Oceanography Class Notes, Fall 2014 The origin of sea salt Chris Measures, Department of Oceanography

Lecture 8: Irrigation Water Quality

Pore Solution Analysis as a Tool for Studying Early Age Hydration & Predicting Future Durability R.D. Hooton, T. Ramlochan, and M.D.A.

A. Yavich, Ph.D., P.E. Optimization Solutions Environmental, LLC Grand Rapids, MI

JACOBS NEW PROCESS FOR REMOVING IRON FROM PHOSPHORIC ACID FINAL REPORT

Appendix C1: Batch Kinetics Tests

Transcription:

Lafayette College Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering CE 321: Environmental Engineering and Science Fall 2017 Homework #12 Due Tuesday: 12/12/17 SOLUTIONS The town of Easton is considering the use of a Pocono lake as a new water supply during the reconstruction of the main water treatment plant. The new supply will support a 20 million-gallon per day usage. A water analysis has been conducted at a local lab to characterize the lake water; the results are as follows: Sodium = 55.2 mg/l Alkalinity = 151.5 mg/l as CaCO3 Calcium = 51.0 mg/l Chloride = 28.12 mg/l Iron (III) = 0.04 mg/l Fluoride = 0.4 mg/l Magnesium = 10.68 mg/l Nitrate = 1.3 mg/l Potassium = 3.7 mg/l Sulfate = 102.0 mg/l The town did not have the tested. You, as a well-trained environmental civil engineer, are able to calculate the approximate concentration of knowing the ph. Be certain to define Total Hardness (TH), Carbonate Hardness (CH), and Non-Carbonate Hardness (NCH). Further Information: ph = 7.9 Cost of CaO = $0.10/lb Cost of Soda Ash = $0.05/lb. Cost of trucking sludge* to a landfill = $20/ton * Assume the sludge after dewatering is 12% solids by weight Because you are Lafayette College civil engineering student you are well versed in lime/soda softening techniques. For this reason you are given the job of determining the following using the theoretical method of lime/soda ash softening: 1) Calculate the amount of present in the system. 2) Draw a Milliequivalent Bar Graph. 3) Report the Total Hardness (TH), Carbonate Hardness (CH), and Non-Carbonate Hardness (NCH) as mg/l as CaCO3. 4) How much lime as CaO would be needed considering the theoretical approach to the lime/soda ash softening process? 5) How much soda ash (Na2CO3) would be needed to complete the lime/soda ash process to remove all of the hardness? 6) How much sludge would be produced? 7) Total cost of chemicals and sludge disposal per month? 8) Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) after treatment? 1

SOLUTIONS 1) Calculate the amount of present in the system Alkalinity is given as CaCO3. Most waterways have a ph range of 6 9, this one is at 7.9, therefore the predominate form of alkalinity would be bicarbonate (HCO3 - ). The following calculation is to convert the CaCO3 to HCO3 -. 151.5 (61/50) = 184.83 mg/l Cation Conc EW MillE CaCO3 Conc EW MillE CaCO3 Anion mg/l mg/mq meq/l mg/l mg/l mg/mq meq/l (mg/l) Na + 55.20 23 2.4 120.0 HCO3-184.83 61 3.03 151.5 Ca 2+ 51.00 20 2.55 127.5 Cl - 28.12 35.45 0.79 39.5 Fe 3+ 0.04 18.61 2.15E-3 0.107 Fl- 0.4 19 2.10E-2 1.05 Mg 2+ 10.68 12.15 0.87 43.5 NO3-1.30 62 2.13E-2 1.06 K + 3.70 39.09 9.46E-2 4.73 SO4 2-102.0 48.02 2.12 106.00 ph is give at 7.9, Therefore the hydrogen ion concentration [H + ] = 10-7.9 = 1.26E-8 mole/l We have learned that the Molar Concentration of = to H2CO3. The reason has to do with equilibrium shifts in water. Since the weak acid, Carbonic Acid (H2CO3), is ph dependent and we know that typical ph values of waterways range from about 6 to 9 we know that due to speciation of the H2CO3 it will be present as bicarbonate (HCO3 - ). And based on research of how speciates as it interacts with the water, researchers have found that the concentration of the intermediate specie, H2CO3, is about 0.therefore the forms of the weak acid present are and HCO3 -. The following stoichiometric sequence demonstrates how in the atmosphere enters the water to for an aqueous form of and then interacts with water molecules. Therefore, as outlined in this discussion, at equilibrium the two forms of the weak acid (i.e., two factions) that are present are (aq) and HCO3 - (gas) (aq) + H2O H2CO3 H+ + HCO3 - We know that pka1 for the equilibrium of H2CO3 to HCO3 - is 6.35 (Ka1 = 4.45E-7) and the equilibrium relationship is stated as: K a1 = [HCO 3 ][H + ] [H 2 CO 3 ] Molar Concentration of [HCO3 - ] = Conc/MW = 0.18483g/L / 61 g/mole = 3.03E-3 mole/l Solving for molar concentration [] = [H2CO3] Ka1 = [HCO 3 ][H + ] [H 2 CO 3 ] [] = 8.57E-5 mol/l; 4.45E-7 mole/l = [0.00303mole L ][1.26E 8 mole L ] [] therefore the concentration of is 8.57E-5 mol/l x 44 g/mol x 1000 mg/g = 3.77 mg/l The concentration as milliequivalent/l is 3.77 mg/l / ((44 mg/meq)/2) = 0.171 meq/l 2

2) Draw a Milliequivalent Bar Graph. Milliequivalent Bar Chart (meq/l) 0.171 0.0 2.55 3.42 3.42 5.82 5.92 Ca 2+ Mg 2+ Fe 3+ Na + K + 0.171 0.0 3.03 5.15 5.94 5.96 5.98 CH 3.03 T-TH 3.42 T - NCH 0.39 NT - NCH NT-TH Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3) Bar Chart (mg/l as CaCO3) CH = Carbonate Hardness NCH = Non-carbonate Hardness T-NCH = Treatable NCH (Soda/Lime Soft) NT-NCH = Non-treatable NCH (Soda/Lime Soft) T-TH = Treatable Total Hardness (Soda/Lime Soft) NT-TH = Non-treatable TH (Soda/Lime Soft) 8.55 0.0 127.5 171.0 171.1 291 295.84 Ca 2+ Mg 2+ Fe 3+ Na + K + 8.55 0.0 151.5 257.5 297 298 299 Check Cation/Anion +/- 5%: 5.98 5.92 100 1.01 % The system checks within specified boundaries. 5.92 T-TH = 171.0 mg/l as CaCO3 and TH = 171.1 mg/l as CaCO3 CH = 151.5 mg/l as CaCO3 T-NCH = 19.5 mg/l as CaCO3 and NCH = 20.0 19.5 mg/l as CaCO3 TDS Total dissolved solids two important considerations when calculating TDS 1) TDS is not reported as any particular chemical; therefore you simply add the weight of each compound. 2) If a TDS test is performed by evaporating the water in a crucible, it is important to know the HCO3 - (bicarbonate) will be converted to carbonate and precipitate out as CaCO3 or MgCO3 (Only one CO3 +2 to each Ca +2 or Mg +2 not two in other words, an equivalent amount of alkalinity will associate with Ca +2 or Mg +2 ). The HCO3 - that remains in the water will convert to H2O vapor and gas. (remember, with a charge of one there would be 2 HCO3 - associated with each Ca +2 or Mg + 2) So the weight of CO3 +2 would be 184.83 (30/61) = 90.90 mg/l TDS before Treatment = 55.20 mg/l + 51.00 mg/l + 0.04 mg/l + 10.68 mg/l + 3.70 mg/l + 90.90 mg/l + 28.12 mg/l + 0.4 mg/l + 1.30 mg/l + 102.0 mg/l = 343.34 mg/l 3

3) Report the Total Hardness (TH), Carbonate Hardness (CH), and Non-Carbonate Hardness (NCH) as mg/l as CaCO3. 0.171 0.0 2.55 3.42 3.42 5.82 5.92 Ca 2+ Mg 2+ Fe 3+ Na + K + 0.171 0.0 3.03 5.15 5.94 5.96 5.98 Carbonate Hardness Noncarbonate Hardness CH = 151.5 mg/l as CaCO3 Treatable NCH = 19.5 mg/l as CaCO3 treatable by the Lime/Soda Softening process Total NCH = 20.0 19.5 mg/l as CaCO3 Total Hardness Treatable TH = 171.0 mg/l as CaCO3 Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ - by the Lime/Soda Softening process Total Hardness = 171.1 mg/l as CaCO3 4) How much lime as CaO would be needed considering the theoretical approach to the lime/soda ash softening process? The only hardness that can be removed using the Lime/Soda Ash Softening process is Ca 2+ and Mg 2+. 5 Overall Reactions that are considered in Lime/Soda Softening: 1) Neutralization Reaction + Ca(OH)2 <==> CaCO3(s) + H2O 2) CH due to Ca (must raise ph to > 10.3) Ca +2 + 2HCO3 - + Ca(OH)2 <==> 2CaCO3(s) + 2H2O 3) CH due to Mg (two stage reaction, ph > 10.3, ph > 11) a. Mg +2 + 2HCO3 - + Ca(OH)2 <==> MgCO3 + CaCO3(s) + 2H2O b. Mg +2 + CO3-2 + Ca(OH)2 <==> Mg(OH)2(s) + CaCO3(s) Remember MgCO3 is relatively soluble 4) Noncarbonate Hardness due to Ca +2 (no further OH - needed to adjust ph, CO3-2 needed) a. Ca +2 + Na2CO3 <==> CaCO3(s) + 2Na + 5) Noncarbonate Hardness due to Mg +2 (Note Mg +2 removed but not Ca +2 ) a. Mg +2 + Ca(OH)2 <==> Mg(OH)2(s) + Ca +2 b. Ca +2 + Na2CO3 <==> CaCO3(s) + 2Na + 4

Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ Ratio/Assessment Table Milliequivalence Equivalent Ratios Chemical/Sludge Assessment (MillE) Eq. # Lime Soda Ash CaCO3/MgOH2 Lime Soda CaCO3/MgOH2 1 1:1-1:1 / - 0.171-0.171 / - 2 1:1-1:2 / - 2.55-2(2.55)/ - 3 1:2-1:2 / 1:1 2(0.48) - 2(0.48) / 0.48 4-1:1 1:1 / - - - - 5 1:1 1:1 1:1 / 1:1 0.39 0.39 0.39 / 0.39 Totals 4.071 0.39 6.621 / 0.87 Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ Ratio/Assessment Table Calcium Carbonate Equivalent Ratios Chemical/Sludge Assessment (CaCO3) Eq. # Lime Soda Ash CaCO3/MgOH2 Lime Soda CaCO3/MgOH2 1 1:1-1:1 / - 8.55-8.55 / - 2 1:1-1:2 / - 127.5-2(127.5) / - 3 1:2-1:2 / 1:1 2(24.0) - 2(24.0)/ 24.0 4-1:1 1:1 / - - - - 5 1:1 1:1 1:1 / 1:1 19.5 19.5 19.5 / 19.5 Totals 203.55 19.5 331.05 / 43.50 Therefore based on the assessment table and considering the appropriate equiv wts.: EW of Lime, also call Quick Lime (CaO) = 56 mg/mmole / 2 meq/mmole = 28 mg/meq EW of Slake Lime (Ca(OH)2) = 74 mg/mmole / 2 meq/mmole = 37 mg/meq EW of Soda Ash (Na2CO3) = 106 mg/mmole / 2 meq/mmole = 53 mg/meq Calculating the amount of Quick Lime (CaO) needed for the LIME/SODA process NOTE: In equations 1-5 slake lime is represented. It is important to note that an equivalent amount of quick lime could also be used. Calculated using Quick Lime Lime as CaO = (4.071 meq/l) x 28 mg/meq = 113.99 mg/l of Quick Lime NEEDED IF Slake Lime were used. Calculated using Slake Lime Lime as Ca(OH)2 = (4.071 meq/l) x 37.0 mg/meq = 150.63 mg/l of Slake Lime 5

5) How much Soda Ash (Na2CO3) would be needed to complete the lime/soda ash process to remove all of the hardness? Soda Ash (Na2CO3) = 0.39 meq/l x 53 mg/meq = 20.67 mg/l of Soda Ash NEEDED 6) How much sludge would be produced? EW of CaCO3 = 100 mg/mmole / 2 meq/mmole = 50 mg/meq EW of MgOH2 = 58 mg/mmole / 2 meq/mmole = 29 mg/meq SLUDGE from EQUATION: 1= Neutralization = all CaCO3 sludge = 0.171 meq/l x 50 mg/meq = 8.55 mg/l 2 = CH due to Ca = all CaCO3 sludge = 2(2.55 meq/l) x 50 mg/meq = 255.00 mg/l 3 = CH due to Mg = part CaCO3 sludge and part MgOH2 sludge CaCO3 sludge = 2(0.48 meq/l) x 50 mg/meq = 48.00 mg/l MgOH2 sludge = 0.48 meq/l x 29 mg/meq = 13.92 mg/l 5 = Noncarbonate Hardness due to Mg +2 = part CaCO3 sludge and part MgOH2 sludge CaCO3 sludge = 0.39 meq/l x 50 mg/meq = 19.50 mg/l MgOH2 sludge = 0.39 meq/l x 29 mg/meq = 11.31 mg/l Total WEIGHT of SLUDGE = 356.28 mg/l Total WEIGHT of WET SLUDGE @ 12% Solids = 356.28 mg/l/0.12 = 2,968.75 mg/l 7) Total cost of chemicals and sludge disposal per month? Cost of Quick Lime 113.99 mg L 8.345 # L 20 MGal mg MGal day 30 day Month 0.1 $ # = $57,074.79/month Cost of Soda Ash 20.67 mg L 8.345 # L 20 MGal mg MGal day 30 day Month 0.05 $ # = $5,174.73/month Cost for WET Sludge Disposal 356.28 mg L 8.345 # L mg MGal 20MGal day 30 day Month 20 $ ton 2000 # ton 0.12 = $148,657.7/month TOTAL COST = Cost of Quick Lime + Cost of Soda Ash + Cost for Dry Sludge Disposal = $57,074.79/month + $5,174.73/month + $17,838.93/month = $80,087.10/month TOTAL COST = Cost of Quick Lime + Cost of Soda Ash + Cost for WET Sludge Disposal = $57,074.79/month + $5,174.73/month + $148,657.7/month = $210,907.27/month 6

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) after treatment? Initial Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) As outlined in Part 2: 1) TDS is not reported as any particular chemical; therefore you simply add the mass/l of each compound. 2) If a TDS test is performed by evaporating the water in a crucible, it is important to know the HCO3 - (bicarbonate) will be converted to carbonate and precipitate out as CaCO3 or MgCO3 (Only one CO3 +2 to each Ca +2 or Mg +2 not two in other words, an equivalent amount of alkalinity will associate with Ca +2 or Mg +2 ). The HCO3 - that remains in the water will convert to H2O vapor and gas. (remember, with a charge of one there would be 2 HCO3 - associated with each Ca +2 or Mg + 2) So the weight of CO3 +2 would be 184.83 (30/61) = 90.90 mg/l TDS before Treatment = 55.20 mg/l + 51.00 mg/l + 0.04 mg/l + 10.68 mg/l + 3.70 mg/l + 90.90 mg/l + 28.12 mg/l + 0.4 mg/l + 1.30 mg/l + 102.0 mg/l = 343.34 mg/l Assessment of finished water TDS 0.171 0.0 2.55 3.42 3.42 5.82 5.92 Na + Ca 2+ Mg 2+ replaces Fe 3+ Na + K + Mg +2 0.171 0.0 3.03 5.15 5.94 5.96 5.98 We always disregard when calculating TDS, is converts bag to a gas. Ca 2+, Mg 2+ and the bicarbonate have been removed from the water through the lime softening process, they became part the sludge that was hauled off. Also the Mg 2+ NCH was replace by Na+ as shown in Equation 5. Therefore: Added Na + that replaces Mg 2+ = (3.42 meq/l 3.03 meq/l) * 23 mg/meq = 8.97 mg/l Summing the cations and anions in the finished water: 8.97 mg/l + 55.20 mg/l + 0.04 mg/l + 3.70 mg/l + 28.12 mg/l + 0.4 mg/l + 1.30 mg/l + 102.0 mg/l = 199.73 mg/l of remaining TDS (plus whatever ions might be missing) 7