Supplementation of Cinnamaldehyde and Garlic Oil on Pre- and Postweaning Growth Performance of Beef Cattle Fed Warm-season Forages.

Similar documents
EFFECTS OF LIMIT FEEDING ON FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS

ALFALFA FOR BEEF CATTLE

Wheat Pasture Intake by Early-Weaned Calves

Effect of Backgrounding System on Performance and Profitability of Yearling Beef Steers

Effect of Angus and Charolais Sires with Early vs Normal Weaned Calves on Feedlot Performance and Carcass Characteristics

Nutrient Profiling - Metabolic Imprinting of Beef Calves

Understanding SHRINK in Beef Cattle

THE EFFECTS OF CO-ENSILING WET DISTILLER S GRAINS PLUS SOLUBLES WITH CORN SILAGE ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF BRED BEEF HEIFERS DURING LATE PREGNANCY

Use of Soft-Red Winter Wheat Forage for Stocker Cattle Production During the Fall and Winter 1

Your cattle need Rumensin

Selection and Development of Heifers

Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle

Effect of Body Weight Gain and Bovine Somatotropin Treatment on Plasma Concentrations of IGF-I in Postpartum Beef Cows

Growth Performance of Stocker Calves Backgrounded on Sod-seeded Winter Annuals or Hay and Grain

Utilizing Coproducts in the Grazing Program

The Modern Range Cow has Greater Nutrient Demand than the Old Style Range Cow

The Modern Dairy Cow

Relationship of Cow Size to Nutrient Requirements and Production Management Issues 1

No-till Dryland Cover Crops as a Forage Option for Beef Cattle

Characteristics of beef cattle operations in the West. C. Alan Rotz,* Senorpe Asem-Hiablie,* Robert Stout,* and Kathleen Fisher

Beef Cattle Handbook

Forage Systems for Pasture Finishing Beef

FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers

LIGHT VS HEAVY WEIGHT STEERS GRAZING OLD WORLD BLUESTEM AT THREE STOCKING RATES. II. NUTRITIVE VALUE, FORAGE INTAKE, AND GRAZING TIME.

Managing Dairy Heifers Profitably in a Pasture System Denis Turner Turner s Heifer Haven Hartville, Missouri

Effects of Creep Supplementation While Grazing Improved Irrigated Pastures

Beef Cattle Library. Weaning Management of Beef Calves 1. Oregon State University. Beef Cattle Sciences

EC Estimating the Most Profitable Use of Center-Pivot Irrigation for a Ranch

Beef Cattle Nutrition Fast Start Training Dec. 11, Overview U.S. Beef Cattle Numbers. Industry Segments U.S.

The importance of Water and Fibre

Stocking rate and monensin supplemental level effects on growth performance of beef cattle consuming warm-season grasses 1

Change FORAGES MORE PEOPLE FORAGES: CHANGE-CHALLENGES- OPPORTUNITIES. Garry D. Lacefield Extension Forage Specialist University of Kentucky

DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARD METHODS TO ESTIMATE MANURE PRODUCTION AND NUTRIENT CHARACTERISTICS FROM DAIRY CATTLE

Lowering dietary protein in commercial herds: Case study

Value of Modified Wet Distillers Grains in Cattle Diets without Corn

Influence of Cow BCS and Late Gestation Supplementation: Effects on Cow and Calf Performance 1

A Comparison of Techniques for Estimating Forage Digestion

Forage and Livestock Management Considerations

The Value of Corn as a Hay Replacement for Cows

Creep Grazing for Suckling Calves A Pasture Management Practice 1

University of Florida Presentation. By: Jerry Bohn

IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY OF YOUR PASTURES. Jose Dubeux, IFAS - NFREC NW FL Beef Conference and Trade Show 2015

OSU CowCulator. A Tool for Evaluating Beef Cow Diets. Instructions for Use 1. Oregon State University. Beef Cattle Sciences. Introduction BEEF108

Animal Science 144 Beef Cattle and Sheep Production. Fall Final examination. December 12, 2000

Rough-N-Ready. Maximize Your Calves Growth Potential

Forage and Livestock Management Considerations

ROUNDUP Agricultural Research Center Hays. Report of Progress 808

Cow-Calf Ranch Input Worksheet- Unit Cost of Production Workshop Users Guide

Defining Value and Requirements in Cow Rations: What is a Calorie Worth?

Matching Cow Type to the Nutritional Environment

Integration of Pasturing Systems for Cattle Finishing Programs

Inoculants for Silage

FEED EFFICIENCY IN THE RANGE BEEF COW: WHAT SHOULD WE BE LOOKING AT?

MANAGEMENT AND FEEDING OF CATTLE DURING THE DROUGHT UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI LIVESTOCK SPECIALIST PATRICK DAVIS

Effects of Sulfates in Water on Performance of Cow-Calf Pairs

INFLUENCE OF PASTURE PLANTING METHOD ON ANNUAL COOL SEASON PASTURE FORAGE AVAILABILITY FOR GRAZING BY GROWING BEEF CATTLE A FOUR YEAR SUMMARY

Selecting a Beef System by Pearse Kelly

Georgia Beef Challenge Rules and Entry Form Ugabeef.com

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

Research in Beef Cattle Nutrition and Management

The Cattle and Chickens

EFFECT OF SLAUGHTER DATE ON PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY OF FEEDLOT STEERS. Story in Brief

Fall Calving in North Dakota By Brian Kreft

Residual feed intake and greenhouse gas emissions in beef cattle

Reducing the Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Beef and Dairy Production: A Canadian Perspective

Winter Cow Feeding Strategies. Why is this Important?

Key messages of chapter 3

Why Rotational Stocking Makes Dollars and Sense Victor Shelton & Jerry Perkins Grazing Specialists Natural Resources Conservation Service

University of Florida, IFAS Range Cattle Research and Education Center March 2003 Volume 6, Number 1

Stockpiling Forages. Stockpiling Perennial Grasses. Stockpiling. Risky business? 8/22/2010. Rocky Lemus August 25, 2010 MSPFSC

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

U.S. Beef Production Practices ---

Grass-fed and Organic Beef: Production Costs and Breakeven Market Prices, 2008 and 2009

Associate Professor. 2~cting Head and Director, Animal Disease and Diagnostic Laboratory, Associate Professor.

Drought Management Strategies for Beef Cattle

Opportunities and Challenges for Cow/Calf Producers 1. Rick Rasby Extension Beef Specialist University of Nebraska

Drought leads to predictable lack of forage production on

Proceedings, The State of Beef Conference November 4 and 5, 2014, North Platte, Nebraska LIMIT FEEDING PRODUCTION COWS IN CONFINEMENT

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

Forage Utilization Guidelines for Beef Cattle

Nutritive Value of the Crop Residues from bt-corn Hybrids and Their Effects on Performance of Grazing Beef Cows

Dear Ranch Hand Subscribers,

Cull Cow Meat Quality

IVOMEC AND A TOTALON/WARBEX COMBINATION COMPARED FOR PARASITE CONTROL IN FEEDLOT HEIFERS By D.G. Landblom, J.L. Nelson, and W.D.

NUTRITION-COW-CALF AND STOCKER

Economics of Grain Supplementation for Organic Dairy Cows

GUIDE TO ASSEMBLING DATA FOR COW-CALF

Southeast Cattle Advisor

What Is the Cost of Gain for Stocker Cattle on Ryegrass Pasture?

Effects of Artificial Insemination and Natural Service Breeding Systems on Steer Progeny Backgrounding Performance

Update on Preconditioning Beef Calves Prior to Sale by Cow Calf Producers. Objectives of a Preconditioning Program. Vac-45 Calves

October 20, 1998 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info U.S., WORLD CROP ESTIMATES TIGHTEN SOYBEAN SUPPLY- DEMAND:

Backgrounding Calves Part 2: Herd Health and Feeding

Benchmarking High Producing Herds

Strategies to Improve Feed Efficiency in Dairy Replacement Heifer Feeding Programs

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXII November 29, 30, & December1, 2011, Mitchell, NE

Mineral Concentrations of Cool-Season Pasture Forages in North Florida during the Winter-Spring Grazing Season: I. Macro Minerals

Jesse D. Savell University of Florida

Feeding Bison Dr. Vern Anderson Carrington Research Extension Center North Dakota State University Box 219 Carrington ND USA 58421

Transcription:

Supplementation of Cinnamaldehyde and Garlic Oil on Pre- and Postweaning Growth Performance of Beef Cattle Fed Warm-season Forages. P. Moriel, G. M. Silva, M. B. Piccolo, J. Ranches, J. M. B. Vendramini, and J. D. Arthington Synopsis The cattle industry is searching for alternative feed additives that can modify ruminal microbial fermentation. Daily supplementation of such plant extracts did not impact growth performance of Brangus cow-calf pairs, but reduced fly counts of heifers grazing limpograss pastures. Summary We determined the effects of daily supplementation of extracts of cinnamaldehyde and garlic oil on preand post-weaning growth, internal parasite load, and horn fly infestation of grazing beef cow-calf pairs. Twenty-four Brangus cow-calf pairs were allocated into limpograss or bahiagrass pastures and provided daily supplement fortification with (CNG) or without (CON) cinnamaldehyde and garlic oil (300 mg/animal) for 6 days before weaning. After weaning, heifers remained on their respective pre-weaning treatments for 72 days. Effects of forage type and treatment were not detected for pre-weaning growth performance, fecal egg counts, and plasma concentrations of glucose and plasma urea nitrogen of heifers and cows. However, CNG heifers on limpograss pastures had less horn fly counts at weaning compared to CON heifers on limpograss pastures. Effects of treatment were not detected for post-weaning growth, total fecal egg counts, and plasma haptoglobin. Horn fly count did not differ between CNG and CON heifers on days 35 and 72. Thus, daily supplementation of CNG oil extracts did not impact growth, metabolic measurements, and fecal parasite load. However, daily CNG supplementation reduced horn fly counts of heifers grazing limpograss pastures, but not heifers grazing bahiagrass pastures. Introduction The cattle industry is searching for alternative feed additives since the use of antibiotics in animal feeds were banned by the European Union legislation in 2006 (European Union, 2003). Plant extracts, such as cinnamaldehyde and garlic oil, are generally recognized as safe for human and animal consumption, and can modify ruminal microbial fermentation and end products formation in vitro (Busquet et al., 2005) and in vivo (Cardozo et al., 2006). The addition of cinnamaldehyde decreased concentrations of acetate and ammonia, but increased concentrations of propionate, small peptides, and amino acids in the ruminal fluid of Holstein steers fed barley straw-based diets (Cardozo et al., 2006). Similarly, the addition of garlic oil (30 and 300 mg/l) decreased acetate concentration and increased propionate and butyrate concentrations in ruminal fluid (Busquet et al., 2005). Despite the capacity to modify ruminal fermentation, few studies focused on growth performance of beef cattle fed cinnamaldehyde and garlic oil. Hence, the objective of the current study was to evaluate the effects of daily supplementation of cinnamaldehyde and garlic oil on pre- and post-weaning growth, blood parameters associated with energy and protein metabolism, internal parasite load, and horn fly infestation of grazing beef cow-calf pairs. Materials and methods The experiment described herein was conducted at the Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Ona, Florida. At approximately 6 days before weaning, 24 cow-calf pairs were ranked by initial age and body weight, and randomly allocated into of 4 limpograss or 4 bahiagrass pastures (3 cows-calf pairs/pasture). All cows received daily concentrate supplementation at a target consumption rate of lb/cow (as-fed; 50:50 ground corn and cottonseed meal) in calf-exclusion feed bunks. All heifer calves received daily creep-feed supplementation at a rate of 2 lb/heifer (as-fed; 50:50 ground corn and cottonseed meal). Treatments were Range Cattle Research & Education Center, University of Florida Ona, FL.

randomly assigned to pastures (4 pastures/treatment), and consisted of: ) Daily supplement fortification with cinnamaldehyde and garlic oil (CNG; 300 mg daily). 2) No supplement fortification (CON). Cows and heifer calves received their respective supplementation for 6 days until weaning. Immediately after weaning, heifers were transferred to of 8 bahiagrass pastures and received daily supplementation of soybean hulls-based concentrate (% of body weight; dry matter basis) added with (CNG) or without (CON) the same commercial extract of cinnamon and garlic oil (300 mg/heifer daily) for 72 days. The name of commercial product and the respective concentration of each ingredient was omitted purposely as requested by sponsor. Cow shrunk body weight and BCS were assessed on days -6 and 0, whereas heifer shrunk body weight were collected on days -6, 0, and 72, after 2 hours of feed and water withdrawal. Fecal samples were collected on days -6, 0, 49 and 72 to determine total fecal egg count. Blood samples (0 ml) were collected from jugular vein for plasma harvest on day -6 (cows and heifers), day - (cows and heifers), and 72 (heifers only) to determine the plasma concentrations of glucose and urea nitrogen (indicators of energy and protein metabolism). Additional blood samples (0 ml) were collected from jugular vein of all heifers on days 0,, 3 and 7 to determine plasma concentrations of haptoglobin (indicator of inflammatory and stress response). Total horn fly populations were recorded on individual cows and heifers using video recording while in their respective pasture on days -6, -32, -2, 35, and 7. Data were analyzed as a completely randomized design using the MIXED procedure of SAS with Satterthwaite approximation to determine the denominator degrees of freedom for the test of fixed effects. Pasture was considered the experimental unit. Heifer or cow (pasture forage type) and pasture (forage type treatment) were included as random effects in all analyses. Body weight, average daily gain, BCS, fecal egg count, and plasma measurements were analyzed as repeated measures and tested for fixed effects of treatment, pasture type, day, and resulting interaction. The proper covariance structure for all repeated measures analyses were selected based on the lowest Akaike information criterion. Results were reported as least-squares means, and separated using PDIFF, if a significant preliminary F-test was detected. Significance was set at P 0.05, and tendencies if P>0.05 and 0.0. Results Effects of forage type, treatment, and any resulting interactions were not detected for growth performance and plasma glucose and urea nitrogen concentrations of heifers and cows (P 0.3; Table ). A treatment day effect was not detected for cows (P 0.23). Daily CNG supplementation decreased overall fly count on heifers grazing limpograss pastures (P = 0.007), but not heifers grazing bahiagrass pastures (P = 0.66; forage type treatment effect; Table 2). No effects of forage type, treatment, and any resulting interactions were detected for total fecal egg count of heifers and cows (P 0.). Although heifers supplemented with CNG tended (P = 0.08) to have less total fecal egg count than control heifers, this response was a reflection of CNG heifers starting the study with less total fecal egg count than control heifers (2.04 vs. 3.69±0.678 log 2 of eggs/g of fecal sample; P = 0.09). Effects of treatment and treatment day were not detected for post-weaning BW, ADG, shrink, and total fecal egg count (P 0.43; Table 3). However, a tendency for treatment day effect was detected for fly count (P = 0.0; Table 3). Fly count was greater for CNG vs. CON heifers on day 0 (P<0.006), but did not differ between CNG and CON heifers on days 35 and 72 (P 0.35). Effect of time, but not forage type, treatment, and any resulting interactions (P 0.23), was detected for plasma haptoglobin concentrations of heifers (P<0.000; Figure ).

In summary, daily CNG supplementation did not impact growth, plasma measurements of glucose and urea nitrogen, and fecal egg counts of heifers and cows during a 6-day pre-weaning phase. However, daily CNG supplementation (300 mg/head) decreased fly count of heifers, but not cows. Literature cited Busquet et al. 2005. J. Dairy Sci. 88:4393 4404. Cardozo et al. 2006. J. Anim. Sci. 84:280-2808. European Union. 2003. Off. J. Eur. Union 0/8/ 2003:L268/29 L268/43. Table. Pre-weaning growth performance and plasma concentrations of glucose and plasma urea nitrogen of heifers and cows. Treatment Item CON CNG SEM Forage Trt Trt Forage Trt time Heifers Body weight, lb day -6 555 555 30.8 0.84 0.96 0.9 0.82 day 0 577 579 Average daily gain, lb/day 0.35 0.42 0.5 0.65 0.8 0.75. Plasma glucose, mg/dl 29.5 26.6.85 0.3 0.28 0.97 0.37 Plasma urea nitrogen, mg/dl 0.8.6 0.74 0.40 0.50 0.3 0.2 Cows Body weight, lb day -6,026,033 24.4 0.50 0.75 0.47 0.62 day 0,035,053 Body weight change, lb 24.7 9.4 8.2 0.64 0.85 0.56. BCS day -6 5.27 5.63 0.239 0.98 0.32 0.88 0.84 day 0 5.09 5.42 BCS change -0.7-0.2 0.35 0.83 0.83 0.54. Plasma glucose, mg/dl 4.6 39.6 4.9 0.54 0.75 0.7 0.83 Plasma urea nitrogen, mg/dl.2.6.5 0.98 0.86 0.3 0.47 Mean concentration of plasma glucose and urea nitrogen obtained on days -54 and 0.

Table 2. Overall pre-weaning fly count of heifers. Forage Treatment Bahiagrass Limpograss SEM Forage Trt CNG 4 5 0.75 2.8 0.08 CON 55 45 0.009 2 0.66 0.007 for comparison of forage type within treatment. 2 for comparison of treatment within forage type. Table 3. Post-weaning growth performance, fly count, and fecal egg count (FEC) of heifers. Treatment Item CON CNG SEM Trt Trt Day Heifer body weight, lb day 0 577 579 25.3 0.85 0.6 day 72 604 65 Average daily gain, lb/day 0.95.04 0.54 0.72. Fly count/head day 0 252y 0x 36.3 0.08 0.0 day 35 57x 33x day 72 2x 2x Mean 44 82 20.8 Total FEC, log2 of eggs/g fecal sample day 0 3.67 2.77 0.423 0.43 0.48 day 35.97 2.0 day 72 0.98.4 Mean 2.2.97 0.207 x-y Within a row, means without a common superscript differ (P 0.05). FEC = Fecal egg count

Plasma haptoglobin, mg/ml 0.2 0.0 0.08 y z yz yz 0.06 0.04 0.02 x 0.00-0 2 7 Day relative to weaning Figure. Post-weaning plasma concentrations of haptoglobin (mg/ml) of heifers. xyz Means without a common superscript differ (P 0.05).