GOOD RETURNS POSSIBLE FROM PASSIONFRUIT BUT THE RISKS ARE HIGH

Similar documents
Annual Chestnut Orchard Cost Per Acre at Production (>5years)

Growing high quality fruit at an internationally competitive cost of production. Ross Wilson & Steve Spark AGFIRST Nov 2011

2012 Cost Estimates of Establishing, Producing, and Packing Red Delicious Apples in Washington

Comparative Costs of Growing Citrus in Florida and Sao Paulo (Brazil) for the Season 1

2010 Cost Estimates of Establishing and Producing Organic Apples in Washington

The New Zealand Apple Industry James R. Schupp 1, Peter Hirst 2 and David C. Ferree 3 1

European Tree Technician

Organic Apples OPM.oo3

FINANCIAL MODELLING: A LOGICAL MEANS OF EVALUATING TREE ESPACEMENT FOR AVOCADO ORCHARD DEVELOPMENTS

High tunnels, also referred to as hoop houses,

Macadamia grower's handbook

Low Risk Medium Risk High Risk My Risk Land is fenced virgin. Land has been used for prairie that has not been

Flame Burning for Weed Control and Renovation with Strawberries

AEB 0022 April 2011 Blueberry Economics: The Costs of Establishing and Producing Blueberries in the Willamette Valley

Middle Georgia Peach Budget

Procedures for Tomato Variety Field Trials

INSPECTION OF SEED POTATOES

eprofit Monitor Analysis Tillage Farms 2016 Crops Environment & Land Use Programme

Summary of Citrus Budget for the Central Florida (Ridge) Production Region

A Growing Industry Tree Fruit Industry Strategy May 11, 2015 Version 5.0

Overview of Florida s s Commercial Blueberry Industry. Jeff Williamson Horticultural Sciences Department IFAS, University of Florida

AND HAZARD TO TUBER HEALTH

VALUE CHAIN INITIATIVES FOR DRAGON FRUIT (PITAYA) MARKET DEVELOPMENT

Economic catalogue for agricultural products Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development

Yield in tons per ha 4.2 per year 4kg fresh = 1 litre pure juice Cost in RWF 238/kg 2600/litre. Price in RWF /kg 3000/litre

2011 Cost of Producing Peppermint under Rill and Center-Pivot Irrigation in Washington State

Trees on farms Growing trees for timber

WINE GRAPE ESABLISHMENT PER ACRE FOR 2015

Economic Implications of Managing Exotic Citrus Diseases (HLB and Canker) in Florida

Narayan Singh, P L Sharma, Amit Kumar Thakur & L S Lodhiyal 1 The Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi

Narrow Plant Spacing. Standard Plant Spacing

The Economics of Citrus Greening

Assessment Schedule 2015 Economics: Demonstrate understanding of producer choices using supply (90985)

OECS GAP CERTIFICATION PROTOCOL FOR THE PRODUCTION OF FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES

EVALUATING WATER REQUIREMENTS OF DEVELOPING WALNUT ORCHARDS IN THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION PROJECTED COSTS TO ESTABLISH A BLUEBERRY ORCHARD AND PRODUCE BLUEBERRIES

EFFECTS OF LIME AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SOLIDS CONTENT IN GARLIC CLOVES

Vanilla Diseases: Shoot Blight (Anthracnose)

Extension Research Note - RNS2

JP FARMS. JP SWEET POTPATO EXPERIENCE: From Farm to Market: Post-Harvest Considerations

Introduction POTATOES 46

Fiji Experience with fresh breadfruit exports

FARM MECHANIZATION. AG ENGG 243 Lecture 1 1

Tomato Insects to be Looking For

Introduction... 2 Asparagus... 4 Basil... 5 Beans, Speciality Green... 6 Carrots... 7 Eggplant... 8 Garlic... 9 Greens, Salad Peas, Snow...

Resource use efficiency in Alphonso mango production in Sindhudurg district (M.S.)

E. Lahav Dept. of Horticulture, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel.

A Learning Model of Technology Transfer for the Kiwifruit Industry

Good Agricultural Practices for Producing a High Quality Peanut Product

Filan is a protectant and systemic fungicide for use against early and late-season diseases in oilseed rape.

Agronomy of New Potato Lines

SPECIMEN. Avoid contamination via drains from farmyards Operator protection. rinsing three times. Add washings to sprayer at SMOKE.

Barley & Corn Silage Costs

Cooperative Extension, University of California FRUIT & NUT NOTES IN THIS ISSUE:

Financial Planning for a Farmer Undergoing Organic Conversion

Developments in the Brazilian Cotton to Attend the Industry Needs. Introduction

Using Enterprise Budgets to Compute Crop Breakeven Prices Michael Langemeier, Associate Director, Center for Commercial Agriculture

An Overview of the Avocado Industry in South Africa As requested by: Development Bank of Southern Africa

The Getting Gross: Make More Gross Margin. Workbook

On the Economics of PVY Christopher S. McIntosh. Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology

Agronomics & Economics Crop Management Decisions Need Both!

Organic pest and disease control

Macquarie Securities Conference Australia

Sclerotinia disease.

ORCHARD GROUNDCOVER MANAGEMENT: LONG-TERM IMPACTS ON FRUIT TREES, SOIL FERTILITY, AND WATER QUALITY

Orchard Shelter Belts

Foliage Color Density Leaf size and shape Wilting? Retention

THE DIFFICULTIES AND SOLUTIONS FOR ENHANCING FRUIT EXPORT IN VIETNAM

Apricot Year-round IPM Program (Reviewed 10/14) Annual Checklist

Shareholder s plantation visit April 2016 The world of natural rubber. The Connection to the world of Sustainable Tropical Agriculture

Technical innovation is a key driver of horticultural business performance, enabling businesses to respond to changing circumstances and demand.

Climate and soils. Temperature. Rainfall. Daylength. Soils

CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE

Win Cowgill. Wednesday April 2 nd, 5:30 p.m. 7:30 p.m. Cost: $45, Registration Deadline March 31 st. Win Cowgill

Spruce problem diagnosis for yard trees. by Jana and Mike Albers, MNDNR Division of Forestry

THE DISTRIBUTION OF FARM PERFORMANCE: DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE

B. The purpose of the meeting shall be to establish the conditions of all existing trees upon receipt of the Project site by the Contractor. Failure t

CALIFORNIA ICEBERG LETTUCE RESEARCH PROGRAM. April 1, March 31, 2009

CFIA - ACIA. National Voluntary Farm-Level Biosecurity Standard for the Greenhouse, Nursery and Floriculture Sectors

National Biosecurity Capability Network. Biosecurity Response Operations: Team Member

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS International General Certificate of Secondary Education

Number 209 September 11, 2009

Main apple growing regions

The Economic Impact of New Jersey s Blueberry and Cranberry Industries

Research. Enterprise Budget for Cucumbers, Year 2. Ann Franzenburg - Van Horne Emma Johnson - Central City Jan Libbey - Kanawha

PROJECTING CASH FLOWS ON DAIRY FARMS

Keeping Organic Cutting Edge. Pamela Riemenschneider, Produce Retailer, Moderator

Late Nitrogen Applications and Potato Storage Quality. Sastry S. Jayanty, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Extension Specialist

PROBLEM OF APPLE MARKETING IN KASHMIR

Enterprise Budget. Sweet Corn, Willamette Valley Region. EM 8376, Revised August 1995

Viticulture PRODUCT RANGE. Solutions for the Growing World

Total PRODUCTION Units Price Quantity $/Acre Pecans Lbs. $ $ 1, Other Income Acre $ - Total Receipts $ 1,160.00

CAC/RCP Page 1 of 7 CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE PREVENTION AND REDUCTION OF AFLATOXIN CONTAMINATION IN DRIED FIGS CAC/RCP

2015 COST ESTIMATES OF ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING RED RASPBERRIES IN WASHINGTON STATE

MAIZE GROWERS GUIDE. Table of Contents

ORGANIC AVOCADO PRODUCTION

Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Marestail in Orchards and Vineyards. Kurt Hembree Farm Advisor, UCCE, Fresno County

Assessment of blackcurrant bush size and wood quality to aid with N recommendations

Costs and Returns for a Modelled 3000mt RAS Salmon Farm. Gary Robinson, GRV Inc.

Teagasc Crops Forum Shay Phelan 07/9/2016

Transcription:

GOOD RETURNS POSSIBLE FROM PASSIONFRUIT BUT THE RISKS ARE HIGH Article by Pat Sale Published in The Orchardist July 2003 Passionfruit has been a small part of the New Zealand fruit industry since the first half of last century. In recent years a healthy export market has developed which would account for maybe 25-40% of national production and gives the industry reasonable grounds for buoyancy as compared to some other exotic crops which have struggled hard to develop exports without vast progress. However, several factors have always kept the area in passionfruit relatively small and these fall into the categories of risk and labour: Risk 1. Passionfruit is a true subtropical and only the best sites in the more climatically favoured areas are suitable for commercial production. 2. It is naturally only a short lived plant. Any commercial planting reaching six years of age has done remarkably well. 3. It is susceptible to wet feet problems in heavy poorly drained soils. 4. It is susceptible to a range of soil borne diseases that can cause significant, maybe large scale mortality as early as year two from planting. If crown canker is involved significantly it is extremely risky to replant the same area. 5. It is susceptible to a range of fungal and bacterial diseases that infect fruit, foliage and stems, which can cause severe losses of fruit and vines. Plus or minus 20 fungicide applications are required per season to counter these diseases. The routine disease control programme is so vital that growers prefer to have their own machinery and spray their own crops rather than rely on a spray contractor who may not be able to do the job when it needs to be done. 6. It is susceptible to a number of virus diseases that can reduce vigour, yield and in severe cases cause a large percentage of fruit to be unmarketable. There is no cure for virus once vines are infected. 7. Being a minor crop without a huge market, the supply and demand balance is very sensitive. Some years ago it was reported that 1000 trays on the New York market, a market supplying a multi-million population, caused significant over supply and a dramatic price crash. 8. With most exports going to USA the US$ to NZ$ exchange rate will have a direct effect on returns to growers. Labour 1. The labour inputs required for passionfruit are very high, in the region of 1500 man hours/ha. This includes the postharvest handling. As the passionfruit industry has not developed to the stage of having commercial packing operations, each grower still packs and despatches their own fruit. 2. Following on from 1 above, passionfruit has been a crop taken up by small producers on small areas. Now we come to the good bit if all these risks of Grand National proportions can be overcome, the returns can be very attractive. As mentioned in this years June issue of The Orchardist, the traditional supporting structure was the single dimension two wire fence, but this has now been overtaken by the A frame, and the potential

2 production is greater on the A frame. Providing a block remains healthy and in good condition, reasonable yield profiles could be as follows: YIELD T/HA Year 2 Wire Fence A Frame 1 - - 2 12 20 3 12 20 4 10 15 5 10 15 A good block should be able to achieve a grade out of 50% export, 30% local market and 20% processing. A reasonable returns would be $11/kg for export, $5/kg for local market and $2/kg for processing which averages out at $7.40/kg for the whole crop. A cash profile over five years and sensitivities to yield, grade out and price are shown below for blocks on both the 2 wire fence and the A frame. For the purpose of this model it is assumed the block(s) are already sheltered. Labour is costed at $10/hour and machinery at $25/hour. The capital cost of machinery has not been included. The cost of freighting the crop to market depends on the location of the property and the market. For the purpose of this exercise freight has been calculated from Katikati to Auckland on the basis of $0.80 per 2kg export tray and $1.30 for per 5kg carton for local market. The mandatory passionfruit levy is currently 1.25% of return at the first point of sale. TWO WIRE FENCE Cash Flow Profile $/ha Yield t/ha - 12 12 10 10 Revenue @ $7.40/kg - 88,800 88,800 74,000 74,000 Variable Costs Soil preparation 1,000 - - - - Plants 2,500 - - - - Fence 6,700 - - - - Marking out & planting 500 - - - - Stem collars 900 - - - - Fertilizer 730 1,910 1,910 1,910 1,910 Weed control 355 355 355 355 355 Mowing 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050 Pest & Disease control 5,120 10,240 10,240 10,240 10,240 Training 3,000 500 500 500 500 Pruning - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Frost protection 600 600 600 600 600 Miscellaneous 200 200 200 200 200 Harvesting - 3000 3,000 2,500 2,500 Grading & packing - 4000 4,000 3,300 3,300 Packaging - 4152 4,152 3,460 3,460 Levies - 1110 1,110 925 925 Freight - 3336 3,336 2,780 2,780 Total Variable Cost 22,655 32,453 32,453 29,820 29,820 Revenue-Costs (22,655) 56,347 56,347 44,180 44,180

3 Orchard Operating Surplus Orchard operating surplus = Revenue (Variable costs + Fixed costs) Revenue - 88,800 88,800 74,000 74,000 Variable costs 22,655 32,453 32,453 29,820 29,820 Fixed costs 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total costs 25,655 35,453 35,453 32,820 32,820 Operating surplus (25,655) 53,347 53,347 41,180 41,180 Cumulative surplus/deficit (25,655) 27,692 81,039 122,219 163,399 Note: Assumption Fixed costs (rates, insurance, administration, accountancy, power, vehicles etc) = $3000/ha. In practice this will vary greatly, the smaller the property the greater the fixed costs/ha tend to be. Sensitivity to Yield, Grade Out & Price Yield t/ha 5 10 15 20 Total growing costs up to 16,855 16,855 16,855 16,855 harvest Harvesting 25hrs/t 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 Grading & packing 1,655 3,330 4,995 6,660 Packaging 1,730 3,460 5,190 6,920 Freight 1,390 2,780 4,170 5,560 Total variable costs 23,343 29,850 36,238 42,845 Fixed costs 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total costs 25,880 31,,925 37,850 43,995 Sensitivity to Yield ($7.40/kg) Yield t/ha 5 10 15 20 Gross return 37,000 74,000 111,000 148,000 Levies 463 925, 1,850 Gross return less levies 36,537 73,075 10,9612 146,150 Total costs 25,880 31,925 37,850 43,995 Operating surplus 10,657 41,150 71,762 102,155

4 Sensitivity to Grade Out (10t/ha) 1. All processing @$2.50/kg. no postharvest costs. Gross return less levies 19,750 Growing costs + Fixed costs 19,855 Operating surplus (105) 2. 80% Local @ $5/kg, 20% Processing @$2/kg. Gross return less levies 43,450 Total costs 31,925 Operating surplus 11,525 3. 25% Export @ $11/kg, 55% Local @ $5/kg, 20% Processing @ $2/kg. Gross return less levies 53,325 Total costs 31,925 Operating surplus 21,400 4. 50% Export @ $11/kg, 30% Local @ $5/kg, 20% Processing @ $2/kg. Gross return less levies 73,075 Total costs 31,925 Operating surplus 41,150 Sensitivity to Price (10t/ha, 50% Export, 30% Local, 20% Processing) Price/kg 2.50 5.00 7.50 10.00 Gross return less levies 24,677 49,375 74,062 98,750 Total costs 31,925 31,925 31,925 31,925 Operating surplus (7,248) 17,450 42,137 66,825

5 A FRAME Cash Flow Profile $/ha Yield (t) - 20 20 15 15 Revenue @ $7.40/kg - 148,000 148,000 111,000 111,000 Variable Costs Soil preparation 1,000 - - - - Plants 2,500 - - - - A Frame 16,500 - - - - Marking out & 500 - - - - planting Stem collars 900 - - - - Fertilizer 730 1910 1,910 1,910 1,910 Weed control 355 355 355 355 355 Mowing 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050 Pest & disease 5,120 10,240 10,240 10,240 10,240 control Training 6,250 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Pruning - 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Frost protection 600 600 600 600 600 Miscellaneous 200 200 200 200 200 Harvesting - 5,000 5,000 3,750 3,750 Grading & packing - 6,670 6,670 5,000 5,000 Packaging - 6,920 6,920 5,390 5,390 Levies - 1,850 1,850 1,388 1,388 Freight - 6,560 6,560 4,920 4,920 Total Variable Cost 35,705 45,355 45,355 38,803 38,803 Revenue Costs (35,705) 102,645 102,645 72,197 72,197 Orchard Operating Surplus Orchard operating surplus = Revenue (Variable costs + Fixed costs) Revenue - 148,000 148,000 111,000 111,000 Variable costs 35,705 45,355 45,355 38,803 38,803 Fixed costs 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total costs 38,705 48,355 48,355 41,803 41,803 Operating surplus (38,705) 99,645 99,645 69,197 69,197 Cumulative surplus/ Deficit (38,705) 60,940 160,585 229,782 298,979 Note: Assumption Fixed costs (rates, insurance, administration, accountancy, power, vehicles etc) = $3000/ha. In practice this will vary greatly, the smaller the property the greater the fixed costs/ha tend to be.

6 Sensitivity to yield, grade out and price Yield t/ha 10 15 20 25 Total growing costs up to harvest 18,355 18,355 18,355 18,355 Harvesting 25hrs/t 2,500 3,750 5,000 6,250 Grading & packing 3,335 5,000 6,670 8,335 Packaging 3,460 5,390 6,920 8,850 Freight 3,280 4,920 6,560 8,200 Total variable costs 30,930 37,415 43,505 49,990 Fixed costs 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total costs 33,930 40,415 46,505 52,990 Sensitivity to yield ($7.40/kg) Yield t/ha 10 15 20 25 Gross Return 74,000 111,000 148,000 185,000 Levies 925 1,388 1,850 2,313 Gross return less levies 73,075 109,612 146,150 182,687 Total costs 33,930 40,415 46,505 52,990 Operating surplus 40,070 70,585 101,495 132,010 Sensitivity to Grade Out (15t/ha) 1. All processing @ $2/kg, no postharvest costs Gross return less levies 29,625 Growing costs + Fixed costs 21,355 Operating surplus 8,270 2. 80% Local @ $5/kg, 20% Processing @ $2/kg Gross return less levies 65,175 Total costs 40,415 Operating surplus 24,760 3. 25% Export @ $11/kg, 55% Local @ $4/kg, 20% Processing @ $2/kg Gross return less levies 87,394 Total costs 40,415 Operating surplus 46,979

7 4. 50% Export @ $11/kg, 30% Local @ $5/kg, 20% Processing @ $2/kg Gross return less levies 109,612 Total costs 40,415 Operating surplus 69,197 Sensitivity to Price (15t/ha 50% Export, 30% Local, 20% Processing ) Price/kg 2.50 5.00 7.50 10.00 Gross return less levies 37,031 74,062 111,094 148,125 Total costs 40,415 40,415 40,415 40,415 Operating surplus (3,384) 33,647 70,679 107,710 Inputs into passionfruit vary greatly according to how meticulous the grower is, the work rate, and the degree of streamlining of the management system. Costs of inputs will depend to an extent on trading arrangements and choice of products. Fertilizer inputs for serious growers will largely depend on the results of soil and leaf analysis, but for this exercise a reasonable standard programme with both major and trace elements has been costed in. Accordingly the above costings are unlikely to be accurate for any one property but demonstrate the type of inputs and returns that can be expected under present conditions. Yield and grade out can be expected to be influenced by the grower, who has virtually no control over price. It cannot be stressed too strongly that passionfruit is a very high risk crop, but for those who produce it successfully the rewards can be well worthwhile.