Belgian Center for Pharamcovigilance for medicines for Human use (BCPH): faggafmps.be

Similar documents
Regulatory and ethics bodies involved in approval process. CA - Submission for authorisation mandatory for

Central Committee for Research Involving Human Subjects/ Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek (CCMO) NB! if CCMO acts as CA:

Bundesamt für Sicherheit im Gesundheitswesen BASG/ Federal Office for Safety in Health Care

Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM) ansm.sante.fr. 143/147 Boulevard Anatole France

Implementation of the EU-law. Tom Van Paepegem Quality co-ordinator D.R.U.G.

Regulatory and ethical requirements in medical device studies. Finland

Regulatory and ethical requirements in medical devices studies. France

Impact of the transposition of the European Clinical Trials Directive. CEMO, Paris 17 November 2004

Competent federal higher authority ("Bundesoberbehörde- BOB")

The EFGCP Report on The Procedure for the Ethical Review of Protocols for Clinical Research Projects in Europe (Update: April 2011) Ireland

The EFGCP Report on The Procedure for the Ethical Review of Protocols for Clinical Research Projects in Europe (Update: April 2011) Bulgaria

EU Clinical Trial Regulation A view from the Industry

Guidance for participating parties version 2.0, DISCLAIMER

Clinical Trials application process, legislation & guidelines

Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco

INSPECTION OF INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMITTEES (IEC) The Italian Experience

Track III: International Clinical Trials: Global Compliance Norms and EU Focus

3 RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES

Trial Master File / Investigator Site File Index Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products

The future clinical trial authorisation process: the new evaluation process

REQUEST FOR AUTHORISATION TO THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY: REQUEST FOR OPINION OF THE ETHICS COMMITTEE:

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

IRB-GCP and Timelines. Andrew Majewski, MSc. 1 st DOLF Meeting Washington University School of Medicine St Louis, Missouri-USA October th, 2010

GUIDELINE REGARDING COLLECTION, VERIFICATION, AND SUBMISSION OF THE REPORTS OF ADVERSE EVENTS / REACTIONS OCCURRING IN CLINICAL DRUG TRIALS

So, in application of and with reference to the above points, this agreement is concluded between:

REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR CLINICAL TRIAL APPROVAL MEDICAL DEVICES DR D DIALE MRS P NKAMBULE. 02 December 2015

Ethics and Clinical trials EU approach

Implementing the Directive - from the Swedish Perspective. Kerstin Westermark MD, PhD, Assoc Prof Head of Division of Clinical Trials

ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENTS: EU CLINICAL TRIALS WITH GMO-BASED ATMPS ANN GORMAN, AMGEN LTD, UK 16 DECEMBER 2016

Primary Care mcta 2013: Guidance for use

Good Clinical Practice

New Pharmacovigilance legislation. Post-authorisation safety studies. ENCePP Plenary meeting. 3 May 2012

International Transfers of Personal Data at sanofi-aventis R & D

Recast Medical Device directives Impacts on materiovigilance

Ethics Committees/IRBs Today: Challenges for Efficiency and Quality

Information on the Member States requirement for the nomination of a pharmacovigilane (PhV) contact person at national level

Review of EU Clinical Trial Directive. 15 May 2012 Mike Beckers Sidley Austin LLP, Brussels

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 4 April 2014 (OR. en) 2012/0192 (COD) PE-CONS 2/14 PHARM 5 SAN 9 MI 11 COMPET 12 CODEC 25

Developing a European First-in-Human Study: Three Key Decisions

The New EU IVDR. Overview of the Main Changes & Clinical Data Requirements. Advance Regulatory Consulting Ltd.

1201 Maryland Avenue SW, Suite 900, Washington, DC ,

Review PROCESS, decision making PROCESS and communication BY

II. Clinical Trial Regulation Challenges for National Competent Authorities Perspective of BfArM Thomas Sudhop, MD

Recording, Managing and Reporting Adverse Events in the UK

Trends in Oversight of Human Research Protections?

How did it evolve? o Public disasters, serious fraud and abuse of human rights. o Trials of War criminals-nuremberg code 1949

Global Clinical Trials in Korea

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR COMPETENT AUTHORITIES TO BE USED FOR ASSESSMENT, REASSESSMENT AND SELF- EVALUATION

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Submitting a CTA application to the MHRA

PK 7.1 QSU 011 E02 PROSEDUR KUALITI PERMOHONAN KELULUSAN ETIKA PERUBATAN

A notice on the issuance of drug clinical trials, ethical review of the guiding principles

GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES GUIDE FOR COMPETENT AUTHORITIES IN MAKING AN ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION NOTIFICATION

Investigator-Initiated INDs

Explanatory note on general fees payable to the European Medicines Agency

IVD Regulation 2017/746

EU Perspective on Regulatory Issues for Biologics

Hospital Authority (HA) Guide on Research Ethics (for Study Site & Research Ethics Committee)

Author Signature: Date: 10 October 2017 The author is signing to confirm the technical content of this document

Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials

The Ethics Appraisal Scheme in Horizon Mr Isidoros Karatzas Head of the Ethics and Reserach Integrity Sector DG RTD

Employment of Fixed-Term Staff Policy. University-wide. Staff Only Students Only Staff and Students. Vice Chancellor

Study Files and Filing

HOSPITAL AUTHORITY (HA) GUIDE

Guideline for participating sponsors

GCP Basics - refresher

Biomedical Research on Human Participants

Combined trial of an investigational medicinal product and an investigational medical device

The World Bank Audit Firm Assessment Questionnaire

3.1. Overall Principal Investigator (PI), who holds the IND and is the Sponsor.

Finnish Medicines Agency Administrative Regulation PHARMACOVIGILANCE

Guidelines and Recommendations for European Ethics Committees

Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 310

APPLICANT'S CHECKLIST

GMO Technology Conference

Clinical Research: A Multifaceted Discipline

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Consumer goods Pharmaceuticals. Brussels, ENTR/CT 2. Revision 1

Workstream 6: Pharmacovigilance

COVER PAGE. Title: Regulatory Implications of Data-mining Author: Renee Harrell Word Count: 2387 COVER PAGE

Electricity Supply Agreement

EIGHT BASIC ELEMENTS OF INFORMED CONSENT

GUIDANCE NOTES FOR MANUFACTURERS OF CLASS I MEDICAL DEVICES

MRC. Clinical Trials. Series MRC GUIDELINES FOR GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS. Medical Research Council

The rules governing medicinal products in the European Union. Presentation and content of the dossier Edition

Good Clinical Practice (GCP): how does a laboratory that supports a clinical trial ensure compliance with these Regulations

Brexit Guidance for Stakeholders Human and veterinary medicines

arena that impact on clinical development

Advanced-therapy medicinal products: new competencies in hospital pharmacy Seminar PH4. Relevant Financial Relationships - None

GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES

Draft proposal for an addendum, on transparency, to the Functional specifications for the EU portal and EU database to be audited - EMA/42176/2014

GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES

Clinical Trials Management for Molecular Diagnostics. April 2016

Ministry of Health Pharmaceutical Administration Jerusalem. Guidelines for Clinical Trials in Human Subjects

Official Journal of the European Union. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)

Sponsorship of Clinical Research Studies

Ethics Review and the FP7 Ethics Framework

Di Renzo Regulatory Affairs ROME - MILAN - LONDON

Draft Agreed by EMA Working Group on Third Country Clinical Trials 23 March End of consultation (deadline for comments) 30 September 2010

June 14, To the World Medical Association Secretariat:

Transcription:

Medicinal Products for Human Use - BELGIUM Competent authority Contact Details Contact Name 1 Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (FAMHP) / Agence Fédérale des Médicaments et des Produits de santé (AFMPS) / Federal Agentschap voor Geneesmiddelen en Gezondheidsproducten (FAGG) Contact Name 2 Research and Development division (R&D division) Phone +32 2 524 80 00 Fax +32 2 524 80 01 Email General welcome@ fagg-afmps.be Email Department ct.rd@ fagg-afmps.be Address Eurostation II - Victor Horta Place 40/40 ZIP/City 1060 Brussels Country Belgium (BE) Web address http://www.fagg-afmps.be/en/famhp/ Belgian Center for Pharamcovigilance for medicines for Human use (BCPH): vig@ faggafmps.be The FAMHP- AFMPS-FAGG acts on behalf of the minister as competent authority. Trial Authorisation / Registration / Notification Regulatory and ethics bodies involved in approval process Competent Authority/-ies (CA) Ethics committee(s) Agency for data protection CA - Submission for authorisation mandatory for Clinical IMP trials CA - Registration/ notification without approval required for CA - Submission required to National CA

Specific Competent Authority for ATMP trials in place No NB! Specific provisions apply for non-commercial experiments as specified in Chapter XIX Art 31 Law 7 May 2004 (e.g. waiver of application and remuneration fees). Submission of Application Responsible for study submission Entitled to study submission Prerequisites for submission Guidance on submission of application Detailed guidance for Clinical Trial submission is provided on the FAMHP site ( section: Human medicines > Medicines > Medicines > Research & Development > Clinical trials) in the following documents: 1) Detailed Guidance CT1: Detailed guidance for the request for authorisation of a CT on a medicinal product for human use 2) Circular 575 + annexes: Application for clinical trials and submissions of substantial amendments. Chapter IX Art 12 (1) Law 7 May 2004 Submission Format Format option(s) Full electronic file and a hard-copy cover letter Preferred format Guidance on submission format available Guidance on submission format Circular letter no 575 + annexes provides guidance on submission format and required documentation of the application. Language of Submission Language(s) of application Dutch French German English Preferred language of application English English accepted Documents mandatory to be in official national language The document for patient consent must be written in the language of the patients (French, Dutch or German).

Submission Fees Fees for trial submission mandatory Fees Each Clinical Trial Application (CTA) must be accompanied by payment of a fee. The fees applicable in 2015 are provided in Circular 616 and are as follows: Complete new application file: 3672,23.- Substantial amendment: 604,63.- Annual Safety report: 655,02.- Waiver for academic (non-commercial) studies possible Official guidance on required fees Circular letter 616: provides the current fees for 2015 A circular letter with the exact amounts and specificities is published each year and is available on the FAMHP website in section: Human medicines > Medicines > Herbal medicinal products > Research and Development > Clinical trials NB: No fees are charged for non-commercial, academic studies (pursuant to Chapter XIX Art 31 (5) Law 7 May 2004). Timelines Authorisation General timespan (max nr days) 15 (for monocentric Phase I trials) 28 Mode of approval (General) Tacit (Silent) ATMP/GMO trials (max nr days) + 30 (up to 90 days if the Belgian Biosafety Advisory Council has to be asked for advice) Mode of approval (ATMP/GMO trials) External expert advice required (max nr days) Xenogeneic cell therapy (max nr days) No time limit Mode of approval (Xenogeneic cell therapy) Clock-stop possible if complementary information requested Timespan counted from The order of submission to the EC and CA is not defined. The trial cannot start until both instances have given a positive reaction. In case of questions to the applicant: One clock-stop of maximum one month for supplementary information is possible

Amendments/ Substantial Amendments (SA) Notification mandatory for Authorisation mandatory for Any substantial amendments Responsible for submission of SA Timeline for approval of SA (max nr days) 28 15 (for monocentric Phase I trials) Guidance on submission of SA Further details on submission of amendments are specified in Circular 575 + annexes: 'Application for clinical trials and submissions of substantial amendments' (available on the FAMHP website in section: Human medicines > Medicines > Herbal medicinal products > Research and Development > Clinical trials) Chapter X Art 19 Law 7 May 2004 Safety Reporting Responsible for AE reporting to CA must declare reportable events to Competent Authority Relevant EC(s) Reportable AEs SAE (Serious Adverse Event) SUSAR (Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction) SUSAR being life-thereatening or leading to death must be reported Within a max of 7d upon first knowledge (+ 8d for additional information) All other SUSARs Within a max of 15d upon first knowledge SAE /SADE must be reported National standard reporting form available Reporting format - Options Preferred format Provision of Annual safety report mandatory Annual safety report shall be provided by sponsor to National CA Relevant EC(s)

Guidance on AE reporting procedure available Guidance on AE reporting procedure Details on submission procedures are given in Circular n 593 and Circular n 586, provided on the FAMHP website in section: Human medicines > Medicines > Medicines > Research & Development > Clinical trials Chapter XV + XVI, Art 27 +28 Law 7 May 2004 The Belgian Centre for Pharmacovigilance for medicines for Human use (BCPH), that is part of the FAMHP, is responsible for the coordination of the different tasks related to pharmacovigilance. Investigator shall report SAE to Reporting timeline Immediately End of Trial End of trial declaration mandatory for All clinical trials requiring authorisation by CA Responsible for End of trial declaration Regular Termination - Declaration timespan (max nr days) 90 Timespan counted from Early/premature Termination - Declaration timespan (max nr days) 15 Reasons for early termination shall be clearly stated Ethics committee Chapter XI Art 21 Law 7 May 2004 Contact Details Contact Name 1 Recognized local Ethics Committees (currently 24) Contact Name 2 List and contact details provided on FAMHP- AFMPS-FAGG website Web address http://www.faggafmps.be/en/human_use/medicines/medicines/research_development/ethic_committee/ Ethical Review General Submission for Ethical review mandatory for Clinical IMP trials Clinical ATMP trials

Submission to CA and EC to be performed in the following order In parallel Sequentially (in any order) Order of submission not defined Circular 619 (08/04/2015) (french version): Provides a list of Ethics Committees having full accreditation status according to the law dated 7th May 2004 related to experiments on human people. Regulatory and ethics bodies involved in approval process Competent Authority/-ies (CA) Ethics committee(s) Agency for data protection Single-Centre Studies - Ethical Review Ethical approval (favourable opinion) to be obtained from Local EC linked to the trial site The opinion has to be issued by an EC with full accreditation status (Apr 2014- Apr 2018: n=24 - Status 2015) If the EC linked to the site has not been awarded full accreditation, but only partial accreditation status, the sponsor of the research project designates a committee with the required status to be authorized to issue a single opinion. The EC with partial accreditation, linked to the site where the study will be conducted, should issue an opinion on the competencies of the researcher, the appropriateness of the facility and the adequacy and completeness of the patient information materials. Multi-Centre Studies - Ethical Review Ethical approval (favourable opinion) required from Lead EC (authorised to issue a single opinion) Submission of application required to Lead EC + All concerned local ECs for site-specific assessment The formal opinion should be issued by one of the ECs with full accreditation status (see Circular ). The situation in the hierarchy (Academic Hospital ECs authorised to issue a single opinion > Non- Academic Hospital ECs authorised to issue a single opinion > Hospital ECs not authorised to issue a single opinion) will guide the sponsor in his choice of the leading EC (LEC) to issue the single opinion for the multi-centre research project. The LEC reviews the experiment and issues a single opinion on the trial protocol considering all the aspects of the trial. The other non-leading ECs (n-lec) send remarks to the LEC on the following aspects of the trial: suitability of investigator, suitability of facilities, Informed consent form. Submission of Application Responsible for study submission Principal Investigator (EC selection) Entitled to study submission Prerequisites for submission / approval

Multi-centre trials: Submission to the Lead EC and non -Lead EC has to take place in parallel. Submission Format Format option(s) Depends on the EC concerned Preferred format Standard application form available No No details provided. Language of Submission Language(s) of application Dutch French Preferred language of application English accepted Documents mandatory to be in official national language Submission Fees Fees for Ethical review mandatory Depends on request Waiver for academic (non-commercial) studies possible Fees for Ethical review Research ECs charge fees for trials with a commercial sponsor as fixed by the Royal Decree of 15 July 2004, but they are subject to an indexation each year (e.g. in 2015: fixed fees given as follows + 25 % approximately): 1. Interventional studies: Initial evaluation: single opinion committee: 1000.-; other committees: 300.- (local advice only). Amendments: 250.- to the EC that gave the single advice. 2. Non-interventional studies: Initial evaluation: single opinion committee. 400; other committees: 100 (local advice only). Amendments: 100 to the EC that gave the single advice. No fees for non-commercial, academic trials are charged. Royal Decree of 15 July 2004 Moreover, the committees receive each year a certain amount of money from the CA : 75 % of the fees paid by commercial sponsors to the CA should be redistributed to the EC. This redistribution is done on the basis of the number of trial protocols evaluated by each committee- further details on the particular procedure is provided in the latest circular Pending payments for ethics committees, available on the FAMHP website in section Ethics committee.

Timelines Ethical Review General timespan for single-centre studies (max nr days) 28 15 (for monocentric Phase I trials) General timespan for multi-centre studies (max nr days) 28 ATMP/GMO trials (max nr days) + 30 (up to 90 days if the Belgian Biosafety Advisory Council has to be asked for advice) External expert advice required: Timespan (max nr days) Xenogeneic cell therapy: Timespan (max nr days) No time limit Clock-stop possible if complementary information requested Timespan counted from Chapter VIII Art 11 Law 7 May 2004 The ethics committee has to give a written reply and submits a copy to the CA. ad multi-centre trials: Lead -EC delivers opinion within 20 days to local ECs of participating sites, local ECs have 5 days to respond to Lead -EC, Lead-EC has 3 days to issue final single opinion to investigator. Amendments/ Substantial Amendments (SA) Ethical review mandatory for Any substantial amendments (concerning investigator, trial site, informed consent) Responsible for notification of SA Investigator Timeline Ethical review of SA (max nr days) Guidance on submission of SA Circular letter 575 provides guidance on the submission and characterization of amendments to the EC (available on the FAMPH website in section: Human medicines > Medicines > Herbal medicinal products > Research and Development > Clinical trials) Chapter X Art 19 Law 7 May 2004 The investigator must notify the EC concerned on the content and reasons of any substantial amendments planned Safety Reporting Reportable AEs SAE (Serious Adverse Event) SUSAR (Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction) occurring in the respective country

Investigator shall report SAE to Reporting timeline Immediately Responsible for AE reporting to relevant EC(s) SUSAR being life-thereatening or leading to death must be reported Within a max of 7d upon first knowledge (+ 8d for additional information) All other SUSAR must be reported Within a max of 15d upon first knowledge SAE/SADE must be reported National Standard Reporting form available Reporting format - Options Preferred reporting format Provision of Annual safety report mandatory End of Trial End of trial Declaration mandatory Responsible for End of trial Declaration Regular Termination - Declaration timespan (max nr days) 90 Timespan counted from Early/premature Termination - Declaration timespan (max nr days) 15 Reasons for early termination shall be clearly stated Chapter XI Art 21 Law 7 May 2004 Additional Information & Specifics The Belgian Advisory committee on Bioethics and Ordre de Médecins provide useful information regarding ethical aspects and general issues.. Study specific Requirements

- Definition (pursuant to national law) The sponsor who is an individual, company or organisation takes responsibility for the initiation, management and /or financing of a clinical trial. (Definition pursuant to Art 2(21) Law 7 May 2004) Several tasks can be delegated by the sponsor to the (coordinating) investigator by contract, but not the legal responsibility. Study Participants - Informed Consent (IC) Standard IC form (ICF) available Standard IC form (ICF) For the purpose of simplification, harmonization and better information to the patient, Belgian ECs developed 4 different validated templates for informed consent (see Circular n 604) 1. A basic model for interventional clinical trials on adults capable of autonomy, 2. A specific introduction for the inclusion of a participant with consent of a legal representative, 3. A specific introduction for the inclusion of a participant in an emergency situation, 4. A basic model for non-interventional studies on adults. All four templates can be downloaded at the FAMHP website under section: Human medicines > Research & Development > Ethic Committee >Templates for informed consent. Standard ICF - The templates for informed consent have been published in August 2013, they will be re-evaluated after an evaluation period in the presence of all Ethics Committees with a complete recognition. IC is regulated by law Informed Consent - Definition/ Requirements Participants must give their free and informed consent before the commencement of a trial (according to the provisions specified in Chapter III Art 6 of Law 7 May 2004) Chapter III Art 6 of Law 7 May 2004 Study Participants - Vulnerable Population Minors / Children - Studies allowed Special provisions apply Legal framework/reference (Minors/Children) Chapter IV Art 7 of Law 7 May 2004 Incapacitated persons - Studies allowed Special provisions apply Legal framework / Reference (Incapacitated persons) Chapter V Art 8 Law 7 May 2004 Emergency situations - Studies allowed Special provisions apply Emergency situation without prior consent of patient or proxy - Studies allowed Special provisions apply

Conditions allowing trial participation in emergency setting without prior consent 1 the experiment relates directly to a clinical condition from which the subject, whose consent cannot be obtained due to emergency, suffers and which is life threatening or which can lead to serious and permanent injuries; the experiment is essential to validate data obtained in experiments on individuals capable to give informed consent or by other research methods; 2 the experiment has been designed to minimize pain, discomfort, fear and any other foreseeable risk in relation to the disease and developmental stage; both the risk threshold and the degree of distress shall be specially defined and constantly monitored; 3 the risks taken by the subject.are not disproportionate in relation to the benefit expected for that individual; 4 the positive opinion on the protocol is given by an ethics committee ; 5 no incentives or financial inducements are given with the exception of compensation; 6 the investigator shall respect the requirements referred to in Article 6 with regard to the subject as soon the individual regains the capacity to consent, or with regard to his representative, as referred to in Articles 7, 1 and 8, 1, as soon as it is possible to contact him. Legal framework / Reference (Emergency Situation) Chapter VI Art 9 Law 7 May 2004 Pregnant or breastfeeding women - Studies allowed No national legal framework available Specific provisions There are no explicit provisions for pregnant or lactating women mentioned in Law 7/2004. Study Participants - Recruitment & Trial Outcome Data Protection Mandatory to inform participant of clinical trial outcome Notification to DP Authority/ Ombudsmann is mandatory Specific notification timelines before operations start Language of notification Official National Language(s) Notification format Paper hardcopy Electronically Notification fee required Fee 25 (electronically), 125 (paper version) Guidance on notification requirements available Guidance on notification requirements Further details on the declaration procedure are provided on the Commission s website in section Privacy topics (in French or Dutch only).

Data Protection Authority/ Agency - Contact Details The Commission for the Protection of Privacy (CPP) Contact Name 2 The Privacy Commission Phone +32 (0)2 274 48 79 Fax +32 (0)2 274 48 35 E-Mail commission@ privacycommission.be Web address https://www.privacycommission.be/en Address Rue de la Presse 35 ZIP/City 1000 Brussels Country Belgium (BE) Clinical Trials must comply with data protection rules as specified in the Belgian Data Protection Act and its implementing Royal Decrees provided on the CPP website. Legal framework (on safeguarding the collection, handling, recording, keeping and/or processing of any clinical trial related data and patient files) Insurance Liability insurance or alternative arrangements for damages mandatory for National legislation Study participants Responsible for covering insurance Chapter XVII Art 29 Law 7 May 2004 A no fault liability insurance for participants is mandatory. General Information: Applicable Legislation & Conventions Official website providing relevant national legislation available Official website providing relevant national legislation A comprehensive overview on the applicable legal texts (laws, Royal decrees, Circulars) including corresponding links is provided on the FAMPH website in section: Human medicines > Medicines > Herbal medicinal products > Research and Development > Clinical trials (Legal texts).

Clinical Trials on IMPs in Humans Applicable national regulations Transposition of (CT) Directive 2001/20/EC Other Transposition of (CT) Directive 2001/20/EC (or comparable national legal framework) Law of 7 May 2004 relating to experiments on human people (Loi relative aux expérimentations sur la personne humaine). This law ( Law 7 May 2004 ) is the transposition of the Directive 2001/20/EC into national legislation, but also applies to any other research, such as gene therapy. It has been modified several times and is only available in French and Dutch. Applicable to ATMP/ GMO trials Transposition of (GCP) Directive 2005/28/EC Other applicable regulations/ implementing provisions (Acts, laws, decrees, ordinances, circulars, etc) Other applicable legal texts (laws, Royal decrees, Circulars) including corresponding links is provided on the FAMPH website in section: Human medicines > Medicines > Medicines > Research & Development > Clinical trials (Legal texts) Gene Therapy Specific requirements Applicable legal framework (1) The Law of 7 May 2004 concerning experiments on humans (Loi relative aux expérimentations sur la personne humaine/wet inzake experimenten op de menselijke person) (see: Law of 7 May 2004, French version (consolidated version) and unofficial translation: Law of 7 May 2004, English version). Art. 13 3 and 4, Art. 11 10 and 11 and Articles 17 and 18 contain special provisions regarding gene therapy. (2) As a matter of principle Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) is required for the manufacture of medicinal products for human use. The EC-GMP-Guideline covers this issue. Due to the fact that gene therapy medicinal products are covered by the Law of 7 May 2004, the legal procedure is generally the same as for medicinal products for human use. Any specific requirements are indicated in the applicable sections. Data Protection Legal framework (on safeguarding the collection, handling, recording, keeping and/or processing of any clinical trial related data and patient files) National Data Protection Act National DP act Law of 8 December 1992 on Privacy Protection in relation to the Processing of Personal Data ( The Privacy Act ). Implementing decrees / ordinances The Privacy Act and its implementing Royal Decrees are provided in various languages on the website of the Privacy Commission in section Legislation and Standards. Definition IMP/IMP Study IMP - Definition available in national law

IMP - Definition The investigational medicinal product is a pharmaceutical form of an active substance or placebo being tested or used as a reference in a clinical trial, including products already with a marketing authorisation but used or assembled (formulated or packaged) in a way different from the authorised form, or when used for an unauthorised indication, or when used to gain further information about the authorised form. (pursuant to Art 2 (19) Law 7 May 2004)