AGEC 429: AGRICULTURAL POLICY LECTURE 24: U.S. AGRICULTURAL TRADE POLICY

Similar documents
A lost opportunity? Ian Sheldon Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics

INFORMATION NOTE, MAY

AGRICULTURAL TRADE AND ITS IMPORTANCE

G-20 and Brazil in WTO the Doha Round: Perspectives for Hong Kong

THE AMBITIOUS U.S. TRADE AGENDA

U.S. Farm Bill Scenarios and Impact on Developing Countries

Agreement on Agriculture and WTO Negotiations

Direct Trade Intervention. Tariffs and taxes Import and export quotas Export subsidies and taxes. Macroeconomic Distortions

Update on the CAP Health Check

Prospects for advancing SDG2 in the run-up to the WTO s eleventh ministerial conference and beyond

Background on U.S. Agricultural Policy: Food Security Objectives and Trade Implications

CANADIAN AGRI-FOOD TRADE ALLIANCE

Table 1. U.S. Agricultural Exports as a Share of Production, 1992

After Hong Kong: Potential Impacts of the WTO Doha Round SPECIAL REPORT. Larry Martin, Al Mussell, and Terri-lyn Moore.

FREE TRADE OF THE AMERICAS, THE WTO, AND NEW FARM LEGISLATION: IMPLICATIONS AND CHALLENGES. Walter J. Armbruster. Farm Foundation

Globalization: Implications for U.S. and Oklahoma Agriculture. Stillwater, Oklahoma November 9, 2012

CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web

The Global Impacts of Farm Policy Reforms in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Countries

Minnesota Agricultural Exports

Canadian Agriculture and International Trade Negotiations. February 5, 2014

Public Policy and Agriculture

Rethinking US Agricultural Policy:

CORN: DECLINING WORLD GRAIN STOCKS OFFERS POTENTIAL FOR HIGHER PRICES

Protectionism SAMPLE

Trade and Biodiversity Carlos Murillo

SOME ASPECTS OF AGRICULTURAL POLICY IN AUSTRALIA

Trade Impacts of Common Agricultural Policy

EU support of its processing tomato industry and the competitive consequences for California

Chapter 5 International trade

1630 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC Telephone: Facsimile:

What Is the Farm Bill?

FAO AGRICULTURE AND TRADE POLICY BACKGROUND NOTE CANADA

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH OF THE FEDERAL MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, NATURE CONSERVATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY

Project on Organic Agriculture

NAFTA s Impact on U.S. Agricultural Policy. Lloyd Day Foreign Agricultural Service U.S. Department of Agriculture

Potential Challenges to U.S. Farm Subsidies in the WTO

Agriculture in China - Successes, Challenges, and Prospects. Prof. Zhihao Zheng College of Economics & Management China Agricultural University

UNITED STATES DUMPING ON WORLD AGRICULTURAL MARKETS

Global Agricultural Supply and Demand: Factors contributing to recent increases in food commodity prices

Role of NAFTA in California Agriculture: a Brief Review*

Agricultural Policy Development in Thailand

High Food Prices and Riots: Trade Policy vs. Safety Nets. Ian Sheldon Andersons Professor of International Trade

Investment Abroad: A Way of Enhancing

What s in the Farm Bill And Why Should We Care?

Emerging Global Trade Patterns: USDA s Long-term Agricultural Projections

John Deere. Committed to Those Linked to the Land. Market Fundamentals. Deere & Company June/July 2014

Problems for Developing the Free Trade Area of the Americas: Subsidies in Agriculture

Actual Farm Bill Spending and Cost Estimates

Why Another Food. Commodity Price Spike?

Tackling Agricultural Subsidies in WTO Negotiations

High Food Prices and Riots: Trade Policy vs. Safety Nets. Ian Sheldon Andersons Professor of International Trade

THE COST OF RETALIATION. How American Farmers and Ranchers Have Historically Paid the Price for Trade Disputes

OUTLOOK FOR US AGRICULTURE

Source: USDA FAS. The U.S. is the world s top exporter of food and agricultural products.

Agriculture in the DDR & South Asian Positions

Agricultural Policy, Agribusiness, and Rent-Seeking Behaviour

Domestic Support to Agriculture in the WTO

A Coherent Agriculture Trade Policy for Mexico. Ralf Peters and David Vanzetti 1. Draft, 30 April 2012

Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy Ulrich Koester, University of Kiel

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Two years ago in May I took part in a seminar like this in South Carolina

Chapter 9. The Instruments of Trade Policy

Agricultural subsidy policies and its development in PR China

Chapter 8: Common Agricultural Policy. Baldwin & Wyplosz The Economics of European Integration, 2 nd Edition

The African Smallholder Farmer s Perspective. Silas D. Hungwe President, Zimbabwe Farmers Union

Things people like and desire.

North-South Economic Relations: The Main Issues

Agricultural Outlook Forum 2002 Presented: Friday, February 22, 2002 CHINA S ACCESSION TO WTO: IMPLICATIONS FOR US AGRICULTURAL EXPORTS

Southern Crops Outlook for 2014: U.S. Fruits and Vegetable outlook

UK Economy and Globalisation Revision Notes if you do one thing..

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and U.S. Agriculture

Gross Domestic Product

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

EU trade policy for mining and metals

Public Policy Responses to the Food Security Challenges in East Asia: The Case of Malaysia

Agricultural Subsidies Remain a Staple in the Industrial World Grant Potter February 28, 2014

AGEC 429: AGRICULTURAL POLICY LECTURE 26: U.S. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

USDA s Perspective on Agricultural Transportation Priorities

Are Competitors Free Trade Agreements Putting U.S. Agricultural Exporters at a Disadvantage?

Market Access Barriers in Agriculture and Options for Reform

Industries Without Smokestacks:

Women in the Food Supply Chain. Maria Riley, OP Center of Concern

The Estey Centre Journal of. International Law. and Trade Policy. Transformative Change in Agriculture: The Canadian Wheat Board

Impact of China s Agriculture Policies on Domestic and World Commodity Markets

EOCT Test Semester 2 final

Summary and Explanation of the U.S.-Canada Lumber Dispute. Dumping: the sale of goods to another country at less than what they cost to produce.

Impact of Trade Liberalization on Agriculture Sector in East Asia

Commodity Program Reform and the Structure of U.S. Agriculture

INCEPTION REPORT FOR THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR STUDY

AGRICULTURAL TRADE AFRICAN, CARIBBEAN AND PACIFIC GROUP OF STATES AND THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION NEGOTIATIONS

China s Agricultural Development and Implications for California Agriculture

Philippine Agricultural and Food Policies: Implications on Poverty and Income Distribution

Commodity Value Enhancement Fund Analysis

Non-Tariff Measures and Agricultural Trade

TPP NEW ZEALAND. goods market access

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXIII December 3-5, 2013 Rapid City, South Dakota OPPORTUNITIES AND OBSTACLES FOR BREEDING CATTLE EXPORTS

WORLD AGRICULTURAL OUTLOOK

Trade Liberalization and Turkish. Agriculture

TRADE LIBERALIZATION IMPACTS ON AGRICULTURE: PREDICTED VS. REALIZED. Draft for comments By Chantal Line Carpentier

U.S. Dairy at a New Crossroads in a Global Setting

Transcription:

AGEC 429: AGRICULTURAL POLICY LECTURE 24: U.S. AGRICULTURAL TRADE POLICY

AGEC 429 Lecture #24 U.S. AGRICULTURAL TRADE POLICY Free Trade: Long-time stated goal of U.S. agricultural policy - World trade in agricultural goods free of any government intervention. - In practice, U.S. favors free trade more in our export markets than in our import markets. - Why do you think that has been the case? Many groups within the U.S. oppose the policy of free trade. - Why is that the case? - What groups are likely to oppose free trade?» Groups that LOSE from free trade will tend to oppose opening markets to trade.» What groups tend to lose from trade? - What groups are likely to favor free trade?» Groups that GAIN from free trade will tend to favor opening markets to trade.» What groups tend to gain?

Who Gains and Loses from Free Trade? Producers in export markets gain - Free, open, growing global markets provide access to large consuming populations outside the country. - U.S. or foreign policies that restrict our exports reduce our production and producer profitability. Producers in import markets lose - Free trade means these producers must compete with imports which reduces their production and profitability. 36 11 4 Livestock & prod Grains & feeds Fruits & vegs Coffe & cooca Sugar Alcoholic beverages Other What about consumers? Do they benefit from free trade? - Answer: It depends! - Consumers in export markets lose while those in import markets gain. 9 9 10 21

Globalization and Economic Integration World has become increasingly interdependent in recent years - Changes in markets in one country affect markets in other countries - Rapid improvements in transportation and communication technology, among other things. - The increasing economic interdependence among countries is called globalization. Globalization is forcing greater integration among countries - Creates challenge for U.S. policymakers in managing the type and extent of integration that the U.S. desires with other countries. - Trade policy used to manage the economic integration process. Three key types of integration occurring in world markets: (1) Economic systems integration (2) Market integration (3) Policy integration

Globalization and Integration Three Types of Integration Economic Systems Integration: The to commercial interaction among countries. - Forces closer coordination of economic systems among countries (economic and macroeconomic policies). - Continual economic systems integration eventually leads to adoption of same currencies and monetary systems, free movement of resources (capital and labor) across borders. Market Integration: The among countries. - Markets in trading countries behave as single market rather than as many separate markets. - Market integration occurs in commodity markets but also in financial and resource markets if there are no barriers to free flow of financial commodities or resources. Policy Integration: among countries - Market regulations and policies must be adjusted to keep commodities flowing freely among countries. - Without policy integration, market distortions will occur. - Inconsistent policies among trading countries generate pressures for change.

U.S. Agricultural Trade Policy Goals and Objectives General stated goals have been to promote free trade and economic integration between the U.S. and its trading partners. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cq3fbcpxccw Four specific objectives of U.S. agricultural trade policy: (1) Expand market access for U.S. agricultural commodities. (2) Build markets for U.S. agricultural commodities. (3) Assist countries in their economic development. (4) Increase U.S. and world food security.

U.S. Trade Policy Goals and Objectives Objective #1: Expanding Market Access Overriding goal of U.S. agricultural trade policy Negotiating agreements to reduce trade barriers with trading partners - Primary means of gaining greater access to foreign markets for U.S. agricultural and food commodities Three types of negotiation strategies - trade negotiations to establish free trade agreements between two countries to reduce trade barriers (examples: U.S.- Israel, U.S.- Chile, U.S.- Canada) - trade negotiations to establish free trade agreement among countries in a geographic region to reduce trade barriers examples: NAFTA, MERCOSUR, European Union) - trade negotiations to establish free trade agreements among a large number of countries across geographic regions to reduce trade barriers (Example: WTO)

U.S. Trade Policy Goals and Objectives Many rounds of multilateral trade negotiations have occurred: 1947 Geneva 1960-62 Dillon Round 1949 Annecy 1963-67 Kennedy Round 1950-51 Torquay 1973-79 Tokyo Round 1955-56 Geneva 1986-94 Uruguay Round The Round (signed in 1994) - Most important round for agriculture. - First time that reductions in agricultural trade barriers were negotiated. - Negotiations lasted 8 years (1986-1994) - Signed by 111 countries with others signing later Agriculture Played Central Role in Negotiations - Completely new operational rules for agriculture agreed upon. - Three major areas (pillars) of negotiation and agreement: 1. Market Access 2. Export Competition 3. Domestic Subsidies

U.S. Trade Policy Goals and Objectives Summary of Uruguay Round Results Pillars of Negotiation Market Access Rules change non-tariff trade measures (like quotas) to tariffs ( tarrification ) bind all tariffs (no increases allowed) Liberalization reduce existing and new tariffs by 36% on ave. over 6 yrs reduce tariffs for each item by 15% = Need to know for exam Safeguards, Accommodations and Guarantees guaranteed access opportunities for exporters through tariff-rate quotas special safeguard measures for importers Export Competition Trade distorting include coupled policies Domestic Subsidies Non-trade distorting include decoupled policies defined limits on existing export subsidies no new export subsidies defined tradedistorting and nontrade-distorting policies reduce expenditures by 36% over 6 years reduce volume by 21% over 6 years aggregate level of trade-distorting support reduced by 20% over 6 years adherence to food aid rules negotiate later on export credits many developing countries subsidies exempted payments under production limiting programs exempted

New Round of Trade Negotiations: Doha Development Agenda New WTO negotiations on agriculture began in early 2001 - Negotiators met in Doha, Qatar to begin consideration of negotiating proposals submitted by 121 governments - Attempt to make additional progress in the three pillar areas of negotiation A lot of negotiating for 17 years but little progress: - Negotiations were to conclude by January 2005 but still ongoing - Negotiations suspended several times (April 2006, July 2008, Oct 2011) Where to now in WTO negotiations? - Main persistent differences include tariff reduction plans and domestic subsidies. - According to WTO, countries are still a long way from where we should be. - 10 th ministerial meeting in Nairobi, Kenya (December 2015) agreed on the Nairobi Package to: (1) abolish export subsidies and (2) allow government stock holding for food security purposes. - Debate on public stockholding continues - 11th Ministerial Conference in Buenos Aires in December 2017 Will countries ever reach a final agreement? - After 17 years of negotiating, many countries giving up hope and looking to regional trade agreements (RTAs) like NAFTA, MERCOSUR, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), and many others.

U.S. Trade Policy Goals and Objectives Objective #2: Building Markets for U.S. Agricultural Commodities USDA Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) administers three major programs to help build foreign markets: (1) Market Development and Promotion Programs (2) Foreign Market Information Program (3) Export Credit and Enhancement Programs FAS Program #1: Market Development and Promotion Programs - Federal funds combined with producer check-off funds (voluntary or mandatory producer contributions) to fund activities in foreign countries. - Extensive overseas programs to persuade foreign consumers to prefer and buy U.S.- produced agricultural food products. - Commodity groups include beef, pork, corn, soybeans, cotton, and others like blueberries, potatoes, citrus, dates, and many more

U.S. Trade Policy Goals and Objectives Objective #2: Building Markets for U.S. Agricultural Commodities (cont d) FAS Program #2: Foreign Market Information Programs - FAS has a world-wide market information program. - Agricultural counselors and attachés located in American embassies identify potential U.S. agricultural. m - They also gather intelligence on foreign agricultural markets to provide timely information on markets like where droughts are occurring, prices in foreign markets, technology used abroad, etc.) to help U.S. agriculture sector to effectively compete in world markets and help inform U.S. regulatory and policymaking officials. - Bad or old information can lead to producer market decisions or U.S. policies that are inconsistent with the realities of world markets. - Example: disease outbreak in some region of the world should lead to quick policy response to restrict food imports from that region.

U.S. Trade Policy Goals and Objectives Objective #2: Building Markets for U.S. Agricultural Commodities (cont d) FAS Program #3: Export Credit and Enhancement Programs - Administered by FAS - Programs offer purchasing credit or other inducements to generate additional sales of U.S. agricultural commodities. - Two main programs: (1) Export Credit Guarantee Program USDA guarantees loans so that private U.S. financial institutions will extend financing to buyers in emerging markets that want to purchase U.S. agricultural exports. The 2008 farm bill made changes to export credit programs to conform to U.S. commitments in the World Trade Organization (WTO). (2) Export Subsidy Programs Step 2 cotton program (export subsidy) - provided subsidy to foreign cotton buyers but was challenged by Brazil as illegal under the WTO agreement. U.S. lost the case and the step 2 program was terminated in August 2006. Dairy Export Incentive Program (DEIP) - uses either dairy products or cash to subsidize exports of manufactured dairy products.

U.S. Trade Policy Goals and Objectives Objective #3: Assisting Countries in Their Economic Development Efforts Key objective in U.S. efforts to build markets for U.S. goods. (Why?) Agriculture is typically the starting point for U.S. economic assistance to developing countries. (Why?) - Agricultural development activities help poor people feed themselves. - As agriculture sectors become more productive, labor can then be transferred out of agriculture and employed in other economic activities, making the economy less dependent on agriculture. - U.S. economic development followed this process. Also, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and other formerly underdeveloped countries - Development brings increases in incomes and standards of living. Increased income leads to. U.S. is major food exporting country so foreign economic development leads to increased foreign demand for food and.

U.S. Trade Policy Goals and Objectives Objective #3: Assisting Countries in Their Economic Development Efforts (cont d) Four General Categories of Economic Development Assistance: (1) - helping developing countries build governmental and private institutions to support and administer an efficient agriculture and food system such as ministries of agriculture, land and property rights management, universities, extension services, producer marketing cooperatives, and much more. (2) - building transportation, energy, irrigation systems, storage facilities, etc. essential to the efficient functioning of agricultural markets and too expensive for developing countries alone to finance. (3) providing services of experts from developed countries to assist in institution building and infrastructure development. (4) - research by U.S. and international agencies to find practical solutions to problems facing the agricultural sectors of developing countries. (Example: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) in Mexico.)

U.S. Trade Policy Goals and Objectives Objective #4: Increasing U.S. and World Food Security Three Dimensions of U.S. Efforts to Improve World Food Security: (1) - establishing policies to ensure the safety and integrity of the U.S. and world food supply such as meat plant inspection systems, regulation and use of pesticides and other chemicals in food production, regulation of food additives, policies to limit importation of contaminated or diseased foods, etc. (2) - food aid and foreign assistance programs to move food from surplus areas of the world (U.S.) to food deficit areas and to help foreign producers learn how to be more productive. (3) - programs to enhance access of poor to food, such as food stamp program, the Women, Infant, and Children (WIC) program, and the school lunch program. Food Security Problems Most Prevalent in and Parts of and. - U.S. is world s largest supplier of food aid, though PL480 (Food for Peace) program. - Free trade policy considered to enhance global food security by allowing for greater food production, lower food prices for food, and greater access to food by lowerincome consumers.

What About Trade Policies Related to Imports? Free trade in import markets leads to increased imports of food which reduces U.S. agricultural production. Policies - Trade policies to limit imports (eg.: tariffs on Mexican tomato imports) - Polices for domestic purposes that limit imports (e.g.: COOL) - Trade Remedy Laws (TRLs) intended to provide temporary safeguards against injurious imports established in Trade Act of 1974 and in U.S. Farm Bills. Two Most Prominent (Trade Act of 1974): - - provides temporary protection against imports to facilitate adjustments to a loss of international competitiveness. To justify need for temporary protection, only serious injury or the threat of serious injury must be demonstrated by the industry. President empowered to impose a tariff (called Countervailing Duty or CVD) to provide protection against imports. - - prohibits unfair trade practices which most commonly is dumping. Dumping is when one country sells its goods in another country at a price below the cost of production. CVDs or other regulatory measures can be imposed.