Griffin s Pen Condition Discussion Thoughts & Notes: Using stocking density to help control dust and mud.

Similar documents
Cattle Outlook. January, 2018

Instructions for 12 and 15 IGT systems (12 pictured)

Electric Forward Market Report

Some contributors to poor animal health and performance

MONTHLY MARKET PROFILE: 12/10/04 Nevil C. Speer, PhD, Western Kentucky University

TOC INDEX. Basis Levels in Cattle Markets. Alberta Agriculture Market Specialists. Introduction. What is Basis? How to Calculate Basis

Beef Cattle Market Outlook

Central Texas Cow/Calf Clinic

Instructions for 12 IGT system

Cattle Market Situation and Outlook

Cattle & Beef Outlook

Veal Price Forecast. October 2015

Panhandle Exercise Report of Carcass Composting at Cactus Feeders Amarillo, Texas. Dr Suzanne Burnham, TAHC with Dr Daniel Thomson, Cactus Feeders

Manure Storage for Environmental Management Systems

12/28/2016. Air. Surface Water. Ground Water. Soil. 1. Calculate agronomic rate. 2. Identify optimal fields. 3. Determine when to apply

Fertility management in organic strawberries

Seasonal Trends in Steer Feeding Profits, Prices, and Performance

Hydraulic Excavators

US Imported Beef Market A Weekly Update

A G U I D E T O ed. Composter Location

LPES Small Farms Fact Sheets* Got Barnyard Runoff? By Chris Henry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, and Joe Harner, Kansas State University

TNT s custom made Fire Pit

Prescribed Grazing Plan

Organic Burial Composting of Cattle Mortality

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT OFFICE MEMO

Situation and Outlook of the Canadian Livestock Industry

Cattle Market Outlook

Tennessee Market Highlights

Cattle Price Situation & Outlook

Incorporating Annual Forages into Crop-Forage-Livestock Systems

FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL GUIDELINES BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES CONFINED BEEF CATTLE FEEDING OPERATIONS

Guidelines and tools to get the most from grazing in Ireland

LANDSCAPE WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT

Livestock and Feedgrain Outlook

IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS

Best Practices for Biomass Feedstock Handling and Management Wood Waste to Energy Facility for Tomslake/Kelly Lake

Dairy Outlook. June By Jim Dunn Professor of Agricultural Economics, Penn State University. Market Psychology

Modeling Your Water Balance

Cattle Confinement Systems

Beef Cattle Outlook Dr. Curt Lacy Extension Economist-Livestock

Materials. Good Material vs. Poor Material. Section 1. Good x-section 4% Good crust of worked in gravel Good ditches

Administration Division Public Works Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

The Impacts of Climate Change on Portland s Water Supply

2014 Winter Canola Soil Preparation x Fertility Timing Trial

Converting square ft to cubic yards concrete

Cattle Situation and Outlook

Grazing Management Different Strategies. Dr Jim Russell and Joe Sellers Iowa State University

U.S. Packing Capacity Sufficient for Expanding Cattle Herd

Refuse Collections Division Solid Waste Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Using Weather Forecasting For Decision Tools For Animal Agriculture

Lecture 9A: Drainage Basins

HV SHRM Member Survey

Weekly Mature U.S. Beef Cow Slaughter

United Water Conservation District November 2016 Hydrologic Conditions Report 2017 Water Year. December 6, 2016

What tools can we use to help us decide when to enter and when to exit a hedge? (Or, or for that matter, when to enter and exit any trade.

Telephone: (706) Animal and Dairy Science Department Rhodes Center for Animal and Dairy Science

Composting for Routine Disposal of Poultry and Livestock Mortalities

TEXAS A8cM UNIVERSITY TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE

Mineralization of Nitrogen from Compost

Effects of Mixed Species Cover Crops on Soil Health

On-Farm Mortality Composting Practices

PolyPavement TM. The Natural Soil Pavement NON-TRAFFIC AREA WIND & WATER EROSION PREVENTION

US Imported Beef Market A Weekly Update

Working with the Water Balance

WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT Publication Series

WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT Publication Series

TRENCH SAFETY FINAL EXAMINATION

Learn more at MarginManager.com May As always, if you have questions, please feel free to contact me.

BIOCHAR SOIL IMPROVEMENT WHY BOTHER? WHAT CAN IT DO FOR YOU? HOW DO YOU MAKE IT?

Spring Forecast Based Operations, Folsom Dam, California

SOUTH AMERICAN SOYBEAN CROP ESTIMATE INCREASED

New Hope Crushed Stone. Monthly Update Solebury Communications Group October 2017

Economics Associated with Beef Cattle Ranching. Larry Forero UC Cooperative Extension April 21, 2016

Signs align for corn profit hopes Short crop in Brazil could be fix the market needs By Bryce Knorr, senior grain market analyst

Historical Prices, Trends, Seasonal Indexes, and Future Basis of Cattle and Calves at Sioux Falls, South Dakota

Asphalt Plant Level 1. Module 3 - Sampling Bituminous Paving Mixtures. Release 10 4/19/

SMA Case Study: Unlocking Productivity through Sales Pipeline Management

MONITORING HEIFER PROGRAMS

Natural Resources & Environmental Stewardship

Does Water Resources Management in the Snake River Basin Matter for the Lower Columbia River? Or Is the Snake River Part of Another Watershed?

Background and Assumptions

Planting Guide for Forage in North Carolina

Recovering a Failed Sand Filter Wastewater Treatment System

Organics Collection Program and Yard Material Pile Collection Update

or

More Feed = More Milk. Dry Matter Intake Used To Express Feed. Intake ASC-135. Donna M. Amaral-Phillips, Roger W. Hemken, and William L.

LAND APPLICATION OF DAIRY MANURE

PASSPORT TO PERFORMANCE Your Year-End. Empowering you to do your best work every day

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE August 1972 FCR-83 cooperating with New Mexico State University COSTS NOV

Traffic Division Public Works Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Performance response of growing-finishing pigs to an air-cooled environment during a simulated hot weather growth period

Executive summary. Butter prices at record levels

5.5 Improving Water Use Efficiency of Irrigated Crops in the North China Plain Measurements and Modelling

Quantification of lake water level influences for Wawasee and Syracuse lakes: Lake and watershed water budgets for 2011, 2012, and 2013

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

EC1700 Clarke-McNary Seedling Tree Application Blank and Information

Grade 10 Academic Science Climate Change Unit Test

Irrigating Efficiently: tools, tips & techniques. Steve Castagnoli, OSU Extension Service

CHP Case Studies. Midwest CHP Application Center (MAC) .org (312) University of Illinois at Chicago Energy Resources Center UIC

Transcription:

Griffin s Pen Condition Discussion Thoughts & Notes: Using stocking density to help control dust and mud. In a nut shell: Dust is relatively easy (tighten up the cattle)... mud is tough (lots of months that cattle can t be loosen up/spread out the cattle enough to allow evaporation to get much done. Dew claw mud will decrease FE 14% (NRC 1996). IF you target your management activities on mud control back in the summer when it is dry you will fair much better the following spring when it is wet. Tightly pack the pen soil (depends on the soil structure... but generally a composite soil [organic matter + either silicates or colloids... either turn in samples to the soils lab or wet the soil and play with it... (the ribbon test as is taught soils judging] packed to > 80 to 100 lbs density is good. You can drill the surface (4.5 x 0.5 core samples and get a dry weight) to estimate the density... 16 g ~= 80 lbs and 18 g ~= 100 lbs/sq ft. Caution: Sand (silicates) will be approach or exceed 100 lbs density, yet pours, while clay (colloids) will only approach 55 lbs density, yet be rock hard until it gets wet when mixed with fresh manure both silicates and colloids are very poor feedlot surface becoming organic mud. Therefore pound density alone cannot be used to evaluate the ability of a silicate soil to stand up under feeder cattle in the environmental moisture is high. Similarly, pound density alone cannot be used to evaluate the ability of a colloid soil to stand up under feeder cattle in the environmental moisture is high. The wet colloid particles slide past each other which is why wet clay soils become soft and sticky. High silicate and/or high colloid soils should have enough seasoned (store in an undisturbed pile for approximately one year) manure added to the top six to eight inches of the pen surface to replace 50% of the volume. In a 100 x 250 pen, that would equal about 700 yards of seasoned manure. Adding seasoned manure provides two things feedlot surface soil needs: oil (from bacterial cell will lipids) and binding to hold soil particles, either silicates or colloids, together. NOTE: Seasoned manure (pen surface cleanings stored in a pile for about a year) makes an excellent mound IF PACKED like silage in a trench / pit silo and is in my experience the preferred material for building mounds. However nothing (soil) will stand up if it does not have a chance to dry... therefore 1. SLOPE: Having approximately 3 to 5 % pen slope from front to back, 2. TALL MOUNDS: Mounds that come all the way to the bunk (waterer if a center pen)... (I love it when cattle need oxygen when they get to the top), fence lines that are approximately one to two feet above the center valley between the mound and fence... (See diagram at the end of these notes) 3. REMOVE SPONGE: A fast scrape monthly to pile in the pen the "sponge" (loose manure)... (IT DOES NOT NEED TO BE REMOVED can be re-spread in the pen after the season s high moistures period. I would be surprised if this is not common knowledge to everyone in the industry. On a personal note... I think the best feedlot pen dirt is made from MANURE THAT HAS BEEN STORED IN A PILE FOR AT LEAST A YEAR... not composted, PILED. When this stuff is packed tight as it is laid down every summer (~ 4-6 inches on the floor and make ALL OF THE MOUNDS from this stuff... it stands up better than anything (including Texas panhandle clay) I have ever used. Sometimes I wonder if a feedyard should ever get rid of their manure... if handled right I think it may be too good as a pen surface to let go of. Nothing below on moisture balancing works if the items mentioned above are not first properly completed you can t cheat any of the above steps and control mud. Sort of doe not work here. I will give everyone one out when there are enough consecutive wet days without any drying pens will fall out from under cattle in even well prepared feedyards. TALL HARD mounds and frequent scraping to pile mud in the pen may allow a measure of relief. Mud Trouble Spots: Can use plastic snow fence 12 to 18 inches below surface to deal will pot hole or bogs... dig out 3 feet, 12 to 15 inches sand, snow fence layer, cover with 12 to 15 inches crushed rock and finish covering with dirt (best if composite mix (>25% silicates, >25% colloids). 1

2

Griffin s Environmental Moisture Balancing Notes: The yearly moisture load varies greatly across the United States! (See map at the end of these notes) These notes will present a way to think about how moisture inputs can be balanced with evaporation to keep cattle comfortable dry with minimal dust. Moisture Balance Calculation Summary (Note: adjustments will be required to balance moisture inputs and evaporation to meet the need to control dust or mud during different seasons of the year) ((AMA/Ty) / (MD/Ty)) x 100 = Sq. Feet Needed to Balance Environmental Moisture AMA (Animal Moisture Added per 100 square ft/unit of time), MD (Moisture Deficit per unit of time) T (Time: Tm = month, Ty = year) Typical: AMA / 1000 lb bovine = 3.0/Tm or 36.0/Ty Average MD in 7 Midwest cattle feeding states = -2.5 / Tm or -30.0 / Ty Average MD in 8 Southwest cattle feeding states = -3.3 / Tm or -40.0 / Ty MW Moisture Balance (Yearly Basis) = (36/30)x100 = 120 sqft / 1000 lbs of cattle Or 12 sqft / 100 lbs SW Moisture Balance (Yearly Basis) = (36/40)x100 = 90 sqft / 1000 lbs of cattle Or 9 sqft / 100 lbs Balance Environmental Moisture (Example Table) Annual Moisture Deficit Cattle Weigh -10-20 -30-40 600 216 108 72 54 800 288 144 96 72 1000 360 180 120 90 1200 432 216 144 108 1400 504 252 168 126 Note: If the annual moisture deficit is greater than or equal to zero, a water removal system (slatted floors, weekly pen cleaning, etc) should be used to meet the space requirements. Moisture balancing: Cattle will add water back into their environment (urine and manure)... in a feedlot on a typical high concentrate diet the equivalent of approximately the amount that would equal a three inch rain per month per 1000 pounds of animal. From the weather service (NOAA) obtain the average and expected precipitation and normal (average) evaporation rate... need to do a few calculations. Try to match the animal density to match precipitation and evaporation. Of the top of my head and as a quick response to you I hope I don't think of something else I should have included. Below is a problem I give my students (and my solution to the problem)... It represents the thought process used when I try to balance the moisture balance in a feedyard. 3

Example of a problem I give my students: Problems with moisture control in feedlots. (Use Data Table below and map below (Grif_a5_EnvMap.gif.) a. CATTLE STOCKING DENSITY: Estimate the yearly average pen space requirements (square feet per head) for 1,000 LB yearlings in WESTERN NE (15" annual precipitation) and EASTERN NE (25" annual precipitation). Note the circled X on the attached moisture deficit map. The moisture load produced by a 1,000 LB steer per 100 square feet is approximately equal to three inches of rain in 30 days. Outline your calculations: b. Respirable Dust Control: Stocking density can be used to control dust, especially respirable dust (< 2 microns). To aid in dust control, what STOCKING DENSITY might be used in Western NE for 1,000 LB cattle in months that receive less than 10 percent of annual precipitation? Stocking density can aid in the control of mud and the 15 to 25% lowered feedlot production associated with mud. Can you think of three other management techniques that can help control mud? c. Mud Control: To aid in mud control, what STOCKING DENSITY might be used in Eastern NE for 1,000 LB cattle in months that receive MORE THAN 15 percent of annual precipitation? Data for problem: NE Moisture Chart by Month Nebraska JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC % Precip. 5 5 15 20 10 5 5 0 10 15 5 5 W=15" W Evap% 9 9 9 4 5 9 14 17 9 5 5 5 E=25" E Evap% 9 7 6 4 5 9 16 20 9 5 5 5 %Precip = percent precipitation, W=15" = Western NE gets 15"annual rain fall, WEvap% = percent evaporation loss by month in western NE, E=25" = Eastern NE gets 25" annual rain fall. E Evap% = percent evaporation loss by month in eastern NE, Note: This precipitation data may not reflect the yearly moisture distribution in your area, but will serve for this problem. My solution/explanation to the above problem: (also available Enviro-Mud&DustControl-MoistDeficitCalc.xls) In PART "a":, "CATTLE STOCKING DENSITY: Estimate the yearly average pen space requirements (square feet per head) for 1,000 LB yearlings in WESTERN NE (15" annual precipitation) and EASTERN NE (25" annual precipitation). Given: The moisture load produced by a 1,000 LB steer per 100 square feet is approximately equal to three inches of rain in 30 days. Note the circled X on the Moisture Deficit Map. This is the deficit after evaporation of all precipitation. For Example, Eastern NE gets 15 but has evaporation of 30 results in a net loss of 15. Let me work through the calculations for western Kansas with an annual precip of 12" (moisture deficit = -30"). The precipitation has already been included in the moisture deficit calculations. A 1,000 pound yearling will put 36" of water back into a 100 sq foot environment. The yearly average pen space would be: 36"/30=1.2, 1.2x100=120 sq ft. PART "b": Aid in dust control in Western NE with a yearly moisture deficit = 15" annual precip - 40" evaporation = - 25" 4

January moisture deficit = 5% annual precip (15"x5%=.75).75-9%x40" evaporation =.75" - 3.6" = approximately = -3 " +3/-3 =, 1x100 = 100 sq ft to balance moisture load. February moisture deficit = 5% annual precip (15"x5%=.75).75-9%x40" evaporation =.75" - 3.6" = approximately = -3 " 3/3 = 1, 1x100 = 100 sq ft to balance moisture load. March moisture deficit = 15% annual precip (15"x15%=2.25) 2.25-9%x40" evaporation = 2.25" - 3.6" = APPROXIMATELY = -1" +3/-1 = 3, 3X100 = 300 sq ft to balance moisture load. April moisture deficit =20% annual precip (15"x20%=3") 3" - 4%x40" evaporation = 3" - 1.6" = APPROXIMATELY +1" May moisture deficit = 10% annual precip (15x10%=1.5") 1.5" - (5%x40" evaporation) = 1.5" - 2" = ROUNDS TO APPROXIMATELY 1" June moisture deficit = 5% annual precip (15"x5%=.75).75-9%x40" evaporation =.75" - 3.6" = approximately = -3 " 3/3 = 1, 1x100 = 100 sq ft to balance moisture load. July moisture deficit = 5% annual precip (15"x5%=.75).75-14%x40" evaporation =.75" - 5.6" = approximately = -5 " 3/5 =.6,.6x100 = 60 sq ft to balance moisture load. August moisture deficit = 0% annual precip - 17%x40" evaporation 0 precip - 6.8"evap = approximately 7" 3/7=.42, rounds to.5x100=50 sq ft to balance moisture load September moisture deficit = 10% annual precip (15"x10%= 1.5") 1.5" - 9%x40" evaporation = 1.5" - 3.6" = approximately = -2 " 3/2 = 1.5, 1.5x100 = 150 sq ft to balance moisture load. October moisture deficit = 15% annual precip (15x15%= 2.25") 2.25" - (5%x40" evaporation) = 2.25" - 2" = ROUNDS TO APPROXIMATELY 0" 3/0= ERROR, closest to 3/1 therefore 3x100= 300 sq ft to balance moisture load November moisture deficit = 5% annual precip (15x5%=.75").75" - (5%x40" evaporation) =.75" - 2" = ROUNDS TO APPROXIMATELY -1" 5

3/1= 3, 3x100= 300 sq ft to balance moisture load December moisture deficit = 5% annual precip (15x5%=.75").75" - (5%x40" evaporation) =.75" - 2" = ROUNDS TO APPROXIMATELY -1" 3/1= 3, 3x100= 300 sq ft to balance moisture load Months less than 10% = Jan, Feb, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Nov, Dec 100 + 100 + (net+) + 100 + 60 + 50 + 150 + 300 + 300 = 1160/8 = 145 sq ft Months more than 10% = Mar, Apr, Oct 200 + (NET +) + 300 = 500/2 = 250+ sq feet Therefore a good average would be approximately 150 to 300 sq feet in Western NE. DECREASE PEN SPACE PER ANIMAL TO CONTROL DUST. INCREASE TO HELP CONTROL MUD. Repeat the process for Eastern Nebraska. YOU DO NOT NEED TO MAKE THE SAME CALCULATIONS I HAVE MADE. ESTIMATES ARE CLOSE ENOUGH. I just wanted you to get an idea of how pen space requirements were estimated. PART "c": Aid in mud control in Eastern NE with a yearly moisture deficit = = 25" annual precip - 40" evaporation = -15" January moisture deficit = 5% annual precip (25"x5%=1.25) 1.25-9%x40" evaporation = 1.25" - 3.6" = approximately = -2 " 3/2 = 1.5, 1.5x100 = 150 sq ft to balance moisture load. February moisture deficit = 5% annual precip (25"x5%=1.25) 1.25-7%x40" evaporation = 1.25" - 2.8" = approximately = -2 " 3/2 = 1.5, 1.5x100 = 150 sq ft to balance moisture load. March moisture deficit = 15% annual precip (25"x15%=3.75) 3.75-6%x40" evaporation = 3.75" - 2.4" = APPROXIMATELY = +1" April moisture deficit =20% annual precip (25"x20%=5") 5" - 4%x40" evaporation = 5" - 1.6" = APPROXIMATELY = +3" May moisture deficit = 10% annual precip (25x10%=2.5") 2.5" - (5%x40" evaporation) = 2.5" - 2" = ROUNDS TO APPROXIMATELY +1" June moisture deficit = 5% annual precip (25"x5%=1.25) 1.25-9%x40" evaporation = 1.25" - 3.6" = approximately = -2 " 3/2 = 1.5, 1.5x100 = 150 sq ft to balance moisture load. 6

July moisture deficit = 5% annual precip (25"x5%=1.25) 1.25-16%x40" evaporation = 1.25" - 6.4" = approximately = -5 " 3/5 =.6,.6x100 = 60 sq ft to balance moisture load. August moisture deficit = 0% annual precip - 20%x40" evaporation 0 precip - 8"evap = approximately -8" 3/8 =.38, rounds to.5x100=50 sq ft to balance moisture load September moisture deficit = 10% annual precip (25"x10%= 2.5") 2.5" - 9%x40" evaporation = 2.5" - 3.6" = approximately = -1 " 3/1 = 1, 1x100 = 100 sq ft to balance moisture load. October moisture deficit = 15% annual precip (25x15%= 3.75") 3.75" - (5%x40" evaporation) = 3.75" - 2" = APPROXIMATELY +2" November moisture deficit = 5% annual precip (25x5%=1.25") 1.25" - (5%x40" evaporation) = 1.25" - 2" = ROUNDS TO APPROXIMATELY -1" 3/1= 3, 3x100= 300 sq ft to balance moisture load December moisture deficit = 5% annual precip (25x5%=1.25") 1.25" - (5%x40" evaporation) = 1.25" - 2" = ROUNDS TO APPROXIMATELY 1" 3/1= 3, 3x100= 300 sq ft to balance moisture load MUD CONTROL NEEDED (Mar, Apr, May, Oct) WHEN NET POSITIVE NUMBER = POSITIVE MOISTURE LOAD THAT CAN'T BE BALANCED. USE: Slope, pack, mounds, and frequent removal of "sponge" (SPONGE is the loose dried manure on the top of the pen that soaks up moisture and softens the pen surface... ) would be the management practices to help balance environmental conditions to the needs of the feedlot cattle. --------------------------------------------------- Dee Griffin, Professor & Veterinarian Beef Production Medicine & Management University of Nebraska Great Plains Veterinary Educational Center P.O. Box 148, State Spur 18D Clay Center, NE 68933-0148 402-762-4504 (Fax: 4509) (MAILTO:dgriffin@gpvec.unl.edu) --------------------------------------------------- 7

8