INFESTATION MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES

Similar documents
CANADA. INFORMAL SUBMISSION TO THE AWG-KP Information and Data on Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) September 2009

Appendix 1: Forest Carbon Emission Offset Project Development Guidance

Mountain Pine Beetle Management in Canada s Mountain National Parks

Invermere Timber Supply Area

Vancouver Island Land Use Plan Higher Level Plan Order

First Nations Direct Award Forest Tenure Opportunities Guidelines

Reforestation. After working through this lesson, you should be able to:

Land vested in Her Majesty in the right of Ontario.

Millar Western Forest Products Ltd.

An Example of Long-Form Audit Reporting

Dawson Creek Timber Supply Area Old Growth Management Project.

Forest Tenure. This lesson provides an overview of Alberta's Legislation and Policy that relates to Forest Tenure.

E8 Forest Management Plan

The province has been divided into six Fire Management Zones based on common management objectives, land use, fire load, and forest ecology.

Dry spring weather conditions have created critical conditions in Arizona s forests

Policy # Section Biodiversity Policy and Program Development

Sustainable Forests, Sustainable Communities

Explanation of the Forest Planning and Practices Regulation Amendments to Protect Secondary Structure

Outdoor Recreation and the Forests & Range Practices Act.

Introduction. Methodology for Analysis

The Galton Project Kootenai National Forest. The Galton Project

Wildland Fire Management Strategy

B.C. FIRST NATIONS FORESTRY COUNCIL

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS

Katahdin Forest Management 2016 SFI Summary Audit Report

ISSUE: CANADIAN FOREST PRODUCTS: CONTRIBUTING TO CLIMATE CHANGE SOLUTIONS

Wildfire Management Branch Strategic Plan Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

Bill 36, the Alberta Land Stewardship Act sets the bar for responsible regional planning

Nez Perce National Forest Moose Creek Ranger District

The guidelines are to be applied for all forest harvesting and forest planning activities within the Champagne and Aishihik Traditional Territory.

Ontario s Climate Change Adaptation Approach. Webinar Dates: November 16, 2017 November 23, 2017 November 30, 2017

Important Copyright Information

B. Wildfire Mitigation

A Framework for Monitoring & Evaluating Wildlife Resource Values

3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance

Big Hill Insect and Disease Project Proposed Action

Introduction. Methodology for Analysis

FIA SFI Summary Re-Certification Audit Report

Appendix A Silvicultural Prescription Matrix Spruce Beetle Epidemic and Aspen Decline Management Response

Decision support scheme conducted for Drosophila suzukii in northern Italy.

Yukon Biomass Energy Strategy

For the property described as: Property Owner: Name. Phone Number. Mailing Address. City. Report Year:

A S T A T E M E N T O F P R I N C I P L E S A N D P R O C E S S

Medicine Bow Landscape Vegetation Analysis (LaVA) Cooperating Agency Meeting March 6, :30 a.m. 12:30 p.m.

New Jersey Forest Stewardship Program Spatial Analysis Project Map Products And Data Layers Descriptions

of BRITISH COLUMBIA Green-up Guidebook Second edition

LITTLE PRAIRIE COMMUNITY FOREST: B2B October 12, 2016 Presented by Jeff Beale, RPF

CSA Core Indicators Indicator/Target that aligns with Kamloops Plan

Old Growth Policy for Ontario s Crown Forests

2011 SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT STEWARDSHIP REPORT

PRESCRIBED FIRE IN SOUTHWEST IDAHO

Proponent Handbook. Voluntary Engagement with First Nations and Métis Communities to Inform Government s Duty to Consult Process

Guide to Involving Proponents When Consulting First Nations

Geophysical Guidelines for the Muskwa-Kechika Management Area

The International Model Forest Network 2008

SANPETE COUNTY WEED DEPARTMENT 160 North Main St. Manti, UT SANPETE INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN

GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE PINELANDS AREA. March 25, 2006 INTRODUCTION

Acres within Planning Area. Total Acres Burned

Cervid Ecological Framework June 2009

PERFORMANCE AUDIT COVERAGE PLAN

Factoring out of indirect and natural effects

J. R. Ford P.O. Box 4490 Pagosa Springs, CO I m a business man trying to use a viable financial model to

Overview of Forest Tenure

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 5, SYNOPSIS Establishes forest stewardship program for State-owned lands.

Fire & Characteristics of Wildfire

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT BRITISH COLUMBIA Office of the Fire Commissioner PROVINCIAL RESOURCE MOBILIZATION PLAN USER MANUAL

Frequently Asked Questions about the Cohesive Strategy and the. Northeast Regional Action Plan

Louisiana-Pacific Canada Ltd.

CEF. Cumulative Effects Framework. Interim Policy. for the Natural Resource Sector. October Cumulative Effects Framework

Newest information and knowledge about the world s forests and forestry

Facilitating Implementation of the Canada-Ontario Agreement on Environmental Assessment Cooperation

THE CANADIAN BOREAL FOREST AGREEMENT. An Historic Agreement Signifying a New Era of Joint Leadership in the Boreal Forest

Fire Management CONTENTS. The Benefits of Guidelines...3 Considerations...4

Rocky Mountain Regional Office

Determining Whether a Proposal is Subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Section 102 Updated March

3.0 Conservation of Biological Diversity

Hybrid poplar in Saskatchewan: Projected long-term productivity and N dynamics using the FORECAST model

TIMBER MARKER AND CRUISER TASK BOOK Required under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 of P. A. 1994, as amended.

Control of Invasive Plants on Crown Land in British Columbia

MANITOBA ENVIROTHON WATER AND AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS

Improved Food Inspection Model The Case for Change

Economic instruments for adaptation to climate change

Forest Management Branch Directive

AUMA Policy Paper 2013.A1

Telegraph Forest Management Project

Applied Management of Conservation Lands in Florida. June 21, 2007

NEW JERSEY. The Resource. Forest Land Ownership (MD) Forest Land Ownership (OH) Forest Health Programs

Lake Britton Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat LAKE BRITTON PLANNING UNIT

[Approval by mail] Indonesia: Promoting Sustainable Community Based Natural Resource Management and Institutional Development (World Bank) FIP

Balanced Budget B 2007

Multi-Year Area-Based Permitting Policy for Mineral and Coal Exploration Activities

Policy and Genetic Resource Management Directions or Who moved my seed?

Strong Breeze Wind Project

Tolko Industries Ltd. Athabasca OSB Woodlands 2016 SFI Surveillance Audit

Forest Tenure Reform in BC

Interfor Corporation Interior Woodlands Operations July 2014

WOODLOT LICENCE W1900 WOODLOT LICENCE PLAN TERM 10 YEARS. August, 2007 to August, 2017

OFFICERS OF THE LEGISLATURE

Ochoco, Umatilla, Wallowa-Whitman National Forests; Oregon and Washington; Blue Mountains

Narration: This presentation is divided into four sections. It looks first at climate change and adaptation for natural forests, and then for

Transcription:

M O U N TA I N P I N E B E E T L E INFESTATION MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES

December 2007 ISBN No. 978-0-7785-6543-7 (Printed Edition) ISBN No. 978-0-7785-6544-4 (On-line Edition) Pub No. T/153 Alberta Sustainable Resource Development

An unforeseeable mountain pine beetle flight from British Columbia in the summer of 2006 significantly increased the number of infested stands in Alberta. This flight also introduced beetles far deeper into the province than previously, requiring a major expansion in the scope of beetle mitigation efforts. This paper updates the roles and responsibilities found in Alberta Forest Health Strategy and Shared Roles and Responsibilities between SRD and the Forest Industry, of December 10, 2003, to reflect this changed situation. As the infestation grows and our experience with control activities improves, it needs to be clear who will be responsible for undertaking specific activities and the related costs. This document clarifies how existing policies apply to the current situation relating to mountain pine beetle in Alberta. There are a number of different land management jurisdictions in Alberta, each with a different party responsible for management activities. Given the severity of the current beetle infestation and the significant risk of further spread, Alberta Sustainable Resource Development (ASRD) and other land management agencies must incorporate forest health considerations into their forest management planning efforts. These agencies must together deliver a longterm strategy to improve forest health conditions, mitigate the significant environmental, social and economic impact of the current infestation and reduce the likelihood of future infestations. Provincial-level Activities ASRD is responsible for a number of activities. Its responsibilities include setting management standards for the mountain pine beetle infestation on all provincial Crown lands with input from stakeholders, including other levels of government, the scientific community, forest tenure holders and other land managers. Direction provided by the department will influence activities on lands outside the provincial government s mandate but still in Alberta. The department will: lead all provincial level extension services, such as forest health training, public education, documentation of forest health conditions and communications; co-ordinate and house all forest health data, which will be readily available to all tenure holders and other stakeholders to ensure the best information is broadly accessible; develop, in cooperation with stakeholders, public education programs aimed at improving awareness of the infestation; communicate through a variety of media, including the department s Forest Health website, annual reports related to forest health conditions in Alberta, newsletters and various informational brochures; work with other Alberta government departments, Parks Canada, the British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range, Natural Resources Canada and forest industry stakeholders to deliver public outreach and education programs; and continue to represent Alberta s interests in national and international venues, although other stakeholders, such as environmental non-government organizations, First Nations and the forest industry, may have opportunities for representation. The department will also continue to promote research and development projects that improve forest health conditions and actively participate in national research groups and federal government initiatives. ASRD encourages stakeholders to initiate forest health-related research projects and share resources for joint research. Ongoing and frequent communication between, for example, land managers, municipalities and the scientific community will provide the coordination needed to focus on priority projects and avoid duplication of effort. 2

Operational-level Activities The land managers responsible for more detailed, operational-level mountain pine beetle activities are: Forest Management Agreement (FMA) holders within FMAs, under the direction of ASRD; ASRD on non-fma Crown lands within the Green Area; ASRD within parks and protected areas under the memorandum of understanding with Alberta Tourism, Parks, Recreation and Culture; Parks Canada, Department of National Defence and Indian and Northern Affairs Canada on federal lands; and municipalities and land owners on private lands. The management of large scale mountain pine beetle infestations requires intensive planning and cooperation Forest Management between these land managers. Agreements (FMAs) Each is responsible for activities allow companies to within its mandate, while coordinating efforts with other agencies to make the most efficient establish, grow, harvest and remove timber use of scarce manpower and from a particular equipment. When the infestation area. The agreements involves multiple land managers, ASRD will coordinate joint require FMA holders to take on certain efforts and operations. responsibilities Monitoring & Surveying for the province, Detection is an important component of an integrated forest including forest management plans health program. However, no and reforestation. one agency can provide surveillance over an area the size of The Green Area Alberta. Every individual using is public land that the forest, whether they work for resource agencies or industries includes forested or use the forest for recreational land for forest purposes, helps monitor forest management planning health conditions. The Government of Alberta relies on the and protection of important watershed cooperation and contributions of areas. The authority these individuals. to make regulations In outbreaks such as the current and decisions rests one, ASRD coordinates and is responsible for operational surveys primarily with the provincial government. to maximize their efficiency and ensure appropriate coverage. The department frequently relies on, and in many cases directs, assistance from other stakeholders, due to the sheer magnitude of the mountain pine beetle infestation-related activities. Pheromones are one of the most effective and economical tools to detect, monitor forest insect populations and hold beetle populations in an area until control treatments are applied. The department maintains an extensive series of pheromone monitoring plots to detect pest activities and forecast population trends. However, since inappropriate use can invite unwanted insect infestations and may lead to pest outbreaks, ASRD strictly controls the use of pheromones on forested Crown land. Other land managers may be asked, or may offer, to assist in this effort. When another stakeholder wishes to use pheromones to monitor pest conditions, they must send proposals to ARSD for review and, where appropriate, approval. Forest Management Planning, Operational Planning and Harvest Activities On non-fma Crown lands, ASRD is responsible for all planning activities related to the mountain pine beetle infestation. ASRD will remain responsible for all Level 1 treatment, although it may require the participation of other parties due to the magnitude of the current infestation. The department may direct tenure holders to treat individual infested trees or stands or high-risk stands within a certain time frame. At the direction of ASRD, FMA holders will amend forest management plans to best accommodate and reflect the current pest situation in an affected area. They will continue to be responsible for planning harvest operations within their Level 1 treatment includes, FMA, whether in response to beetle infesta- individual tree treatment but is not limited to tions or proactively to such as grinding, peeling reduce the presence of or burning and insecticide susceptible pine on the treatments. landscape. Despite the best intentions and efforts, severe pest outbreaks can Level 2 treatment refers to block or patch harvesting of infested areas. 3

cause extensive tree mortality. Unlike wildfire kills, forest pest-related tree mortality tends to progress over years. With this massive infestation, it is likely that the province will lack the capacity to treat and process the volume of trees available for salvage. Tenure holders will develop salvage plans consistent with provincial direction, such as provincial policies and local priorities, and complete salvage operations to the extent possible. Salvage plans, similar to typical forest management plans, must recognize and include steps to protect both timber and non-timber values, such as watersheds or wildlife habitat. Municipal government officials will work with land owners to address mountain pine beetle infestations. The provincial government has provided grants to municipalities to help offset some of the costs involved, where treatments in the municipality are strategically important to control the spread of the beetle infestation on private and provincial lands. Prescribed Burning Due to the risk posed to other resources, ASRD will continue to lead prescribed burning efforts on all provincial Crown lands. Within protected areas, where timber harvest is typically restricted, prescribed fire will be the dominant management tool, while within the working forest it will be one of several management options. Federal government agencies will remain responsible for lands under their jurisdiction, including national parks, First Nations lands and Department of National Defence lands. Municipalities and land owners will need to co-ordinate their efforts for prescribed burns on private lands. and eastwards to the boreal forest. This is the front line of the infestation. Control will generally consist of Level 1 treatment. Holding Zone areas that have significantly more infested trees than the leading-edge zone but still require control efforts to reduce or hold the beetle population in check. Control consists of Level 2 treatment supplemented with Level 1 treatment. Salvage Zone areas with a large number of infested trees or where beetle-control treatments are typically ineffective. Harvesting of stands achieves other forest management objectives. Because there are different management objectives in each zone, each sees a slightly different approach to the infestation. Adding complexity, within each zone different entities are responsible for various land management activities. This complexity means treatment activities require coordinated effort from all land managers. Future Direction in Treatment Responsibilities The Government of Alberta has enhanced its management approach to improve the efficacy of treatment activities. This approach segregates the mountain pine beetle infestation into three distinct beetle management zones: Leading-edge Zone high priority areas where beetle populations threaten to spread along the eastern slopes The segregation of affected areas into these zones will help ensure more efficient and effective treatment activities. By identifying and focussing certain efforts in the most appropriate locations, ASRD hopes to reduce and mitigate the impact of the beetle as much as possible. Additionally, when the department establishes these zones, and updates them as better information becomes available, all parties will immediately know who is responsible for which activities. This clarity will support the most timely response possible. 4

ASRD will produce maps showing the location of each zone in the fall, shortly after completing aerial surveys and population forecasts of the status of the beetle throughout the province. ASRD will monitor the remainder of the province to determine the presence of beetle populations and adjust management zone boundaries accordingly. ASRD, with the Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta (FRIAA), has developed a contract for services that allows other land managers to deliver activities that traditionally fall under the department s mandate. The attached table indicates potential eligible activities and circumstances with an asterix (*). Additionally, the provincial government has provided municipal grants to help offset treatment costs incurred by a municipality on lands within the municipality. The attached table indicates eligible potential activities as approved by ASRD by a + symbol. The grant agreement provides further information. Again, these activities have been and remain the responsibility of the provincial government. The department will continue to coordinate management activities on First Nations lands with Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. Tables of Organizations and Responsibilities for Various Activities, by Management Zone A) Leading-edge Zone High priority areas with a relatively low number of infested trees. This is the front line of the infestation. Activity FMA Non-FMA Crown land Parks & Protected Areas Federal land Municipality Private land Baiting Baits monitoring ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD+ Baits containment ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD+ Surveying Ground Ground truth ASRD NRCAN MD+ Walkthrough ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD+ Concentric ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD+ Transect ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD+ Infestation extent ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD+ R-Value ASRD NRCAN MD+ Surveying Aerial Overview ASRD* ASRD NRCAN ASRD+ Detailed Heli-GPS ASRD* ASRD NRCAN ASRD+ Treatment Beetle Strategy Set Beetle Policy Priorities ASRD NRCAN ASRD Level 1 Control ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD+ Level 2 Forest Mgmt Planning ASRD NRCAN Land Owner+ Level 2 Harvest Planning FMA Tenure Holder ASRD/TPRC NRCAN Land Owner+ Level 2 Harvest Operations FMA Tenure Holder ASRD/TPRC NRCAN Land Owner Level 2 Prescribed Burns ASRD NRCAN MD Grid Baiting of Cutblocks ARSD* ASRD -- -- Land Owner+ Treatment Pine Strategy Prescribed Burns ASRD NRCAN -- Forest Management Planning ASRD NRCAN Land Owner+ Harvest Planning FMA Tenure Holder ASRD/TPRC NRCAN Land Owner+ Harvest Operations FMA Tenure Holder ASRD/TPRC NRCAN Land Owner Reforestation FMA Tenure Holder ASRD NRCAN Land Owner ASRD Alberta Sustainable Resource Development FMA Forest Management Agreement MD Municipal District NRCAN Natural Resources Canada TPRC Tourism, Parks, Recreation & Culture 5

B) Holding Zone Areas with significantly more infested trees than the Leading-edge Zone but still require control efforts. Control consists of Level 2 treatment supplemented with Level 1 treatment where appropriate. Activity FMA Non-FMA Crown land Parks & Protected Areas Federal land Municipality Private land Baiting Baits monitoring ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD+ Baits containment ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD+ Surveying Ground Ground truth ASRD NRCAN MD Walkthrough ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD Concentric ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD+ Transect ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD+ Infestation extent ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD R-Value ASRD NRCAN MD+ Surveying Aerial Overview ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD Detailed Heli-GPS ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD Treatment Beetle Strategy Set Beetle Policy Priorities ASRD NRCAN ASRD Level 1 Control ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD+ Level 2 Forest Mgmt Planning ASRD NRCAN Land Owner+ Level 2 Harvest Planning FMA Tenure Holder ASRD NRCAN Land Owner Level 2 Harvest Operations FMA Tenure Holder ASRD NRCAN Land Owner Level 2 Prescribed Burns ASRD NRCAN MD Treatment Pine Strategy Prescribed Burns ASRD NRCAN -- Forest Management Planning ASRD NRCAN Land Owner+ Harvest Planning FMA Tenure Holder ASRD NRCAN Land Owner Harvest Operations FMA Tenure Holder ASRD NRCAN Land Owner Reforestation FMA Tenure Holder ASRD NRCAN Land Owner ASRD Alberta Sustainable Resource Development MD Municipal District FMA Forest Management Agreement NRCAN Natural Resources Canada C) Salvage Zone Areas with a large number of infested trees or where beetle-control treatments are typically seen as ineffective. Tree harvesting will meet other forest management objectives. Activity FMA Non-FMA Crown land Parks & Protected Areas Federal land Municipality Private land Baiting Baits monitoring ASRD* ASRD NRCAN -- Baits containment ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD Surveying Ground Ground truth ASRD NRCAN MD Walkthrough ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD Concentric ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD Transect ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD Infestation extent ASRD* ASRD NRCAN MD R-Value ASRD NRCAN -- Surveying Aerial Overview ASRD NRCAN ASRD+ Detailed Heli-GPS -- -- -- -- -- Treatment Beetle Strategy Set Beetle Policy Priorities ASRD NRCAN ASRD Level 1 Control -- -- -- -- -- Level 2 Forest Mgmt Planning ASRD NRCAN Land Owner+ Level 2 Harvest Planning FMA Tenure Holder -- -- Land Owner Level 2 Harvest Operations FMA Tenure Holder -- NRCAN Land Owner Level 2 Prescribed Burns ASRD NRCAN MD Treatment Pine Strategy Prescribed Burns ASRD NRCAN -- Forest Management Planning ASRD NRCAN Land Owner+ Harvest Planning FMA Tenure Holder -- NRCAN Land Owner Harvest Operations FMA Tenure Holder -- NRCAN Land Owner Reforestation FMA Tenure Holder ASRD -- Land Owner ASRD Alberta Sustainable Resource Development MD Municipal District FMA Forest Management Agreement NRCAN Natural Resources Canada 6