A Review of the Current State of Knowledge on Phosphorus Removal

Similar documents
A Roadmap for Smarter Nutrient Management in a Carbon and Energy Constrained World. Samuel Jeyanayagam, PhD, PE, BCEE

Technology Update Phosphorus Removal. Samuel Jeyanayagam, PhD, PE, BCEE Vice President/Senior Principal Technologist CH2M HILL

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

Process Monitoring for Biological and Chemical Nutrient Removal

Carbon Redirection and its Role in Energy Optimization at Water Resource Recovery Facilities

JTAC Presentation May 18, Nutrient Removal Process Fundamentals and Operation

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

NUTRIENT REMOVAL PROCESSES IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT. We re Glad You re Here!

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Designing Single-Sludge Bionutrient Removal Systems

EVALUATING ALTERNATIVES FOR DISPOSING OF WATER PLANT SOLIDS INTO A WASTEWATER PLANT

UV DISINFECTION OF LOW TRANSMITTANCE PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER

Paradigm Shift in Phosphorus Removal from WWTPs Annual Conference June 20, 2012

Proposal by Russia to delete hot sub-spot Hot sub-spot name South-West Wastewater Treatment Plant

Overview of Supplemental Carbon Sources for Denitrification and Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal

Use of Biowin for Process Troubleshooting / Design for a Unique Wastewater

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

Lysis and Autooxidation. Organic Nitrogen (net growth) Figure by MIT OCW.

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

TDS AND SLUDGE GENERATION IMPACTS FROM USE OF CHEMICALS IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT

A STRUVITE CONTROL AND PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PROCESS FOR CENTRATE: FULL-SCALE TESTING. 850 Pembina Highway Winnipeg, MB

Wastewater Treatment Processes

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

Case Study. BiOWiSH Aqua. Biological Help for the Human Race. Municipal Wastewater Bathurst Waste Water Treatment Works Australia.

Advances in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal at Low DO Conditions

Biological Nutrient Removal vs. Chemical Nutrient Removal

SECTION 14.0 BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL

USING NUMERICAL SIMULATION SOFTWARE FOR IMPROVING WASTEWATER TREATMENT EFFICIENCY

WEFTEC.06. **Cobb County Water System, Marietta, Georgia

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

Chapter 11. Secondary Clarifiers

FARM DIGESTERS AND MANURE PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT

WWETCO FlexFilter and Bio-FlexFilter

MIXED LIQUOR FERMENTATION FOR CARBON AUGMENTATION BREAKING FREE FROM AN UNFAVORABLE INFLUENT CARBON BALANCE

PHOSPHORUS RECOVERY FROM SEWAGE SLUDGE USING THE AQUACRITOX SUPERCRITICAL WATER OXIDATION PROCESS

Effect of the start-up length on the biological nutrient removal process

Watertown Wastewater Facility Plan. August 11, 2015

General Information on Nitrogen

Wisconsin Wastewater Operators Association October 4 th 7 th LaCrosse, WI

CHEMICAL FREE PHOSPHOROUS ELIMINSTION P-UPTAKE PROCESS

Lowering The Total Cost Of Operation

ISAM INTEGRATED SURGE ANOXIC MIX

Unit Treatment Processes in Water and Wastewater Engineering

Wastewater Treatment Processes

Evaluation of Conventional Activated Sludge Compared to Membrane Bioreactors

Innovations in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal

Managing the Risk of Embracing Disruptive Technology

Lagoons Operation and Management in New Brunswick

So You ve Removed Your Phosphorus? Now What? JTAC Luncheon April 9 th, 2014


Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

W O C H H O L Z R E G I O N A L W A T E R R E C L A M A T I O N F A C I L I T Y O V E R V I E W

Environmental Biotechnology Cooperative Research Centre Date submitted: March 2008 Date published: March 2011

A SITE-SPECIFIC TOOL FOR OPTIMIZING FINAL CLARIFIER DESIGN AND OPERATION

Outline. Municipal Wastewater Engineering. Advanced wastewater treatment. Advanced wastewater treatment. Advanced wastewater treatment

Module 22 : Sludge Management

Field Validation of Sequencing Batch Reactor and Cloth Media Filtration Technologies To Attain Ultra-Low Nutrient Levels

International Joint Commission Water & Wastewater Treatment Best Management Practices Forum Monday, March 26, 2012 Wayne State University, Detroit MI

Activated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification

AMMONIA AND PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL IN WASTE WATER TREATMENT

EFFECT OF PROCESS CONFIGURATIONS AND ALUM ADDITION ON EBPR IN MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS. Erik Johannessen,* Randal W. Samstag,** H.

East Coast P Removal Technology Performance Summary

Improving Septic Tank Performance by Enhancing Anaerobic Digestion NOWRA Onsite Wastewater Mega-Conference

Ballasted Activated Sludge Demonstration Study SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

Emerging Technologies in Sludge Minimization

Aeration University Advanced Concepts in Energy Efficiency

More Affordable, Reliable and Recoverable Nutrient Removal

4 Angles. Pilot-scale Evaluation of AirPrex for Phosphorus Management. Innovation Program Phosphorus Initiative JTAC 4/22/2017

Struvia Technology for Phosphorus Recovery. o Re-Water Braunschweig November 2015

PHYSICOCHEMICAL TREATMENT OF DAIRY PLANT WASTEWATER USING FERROUS SULFATE AND FERRIC CHLORIDE COAGULANTS

Integrated Activated Sludge and Biosolids Treatment to Conserve Energy & Waste Solids Disposal

IMPROVED BIO-TOWER TECHNOLOGY MUNICIPAL SEWAGE TREATMENT

Prepared by the Operation of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants Task Force of the Water Environment Federation

TROUBLESHOOTING BNR PROCESSES E. Stone, S. Walker, R. Reardon Carollo Engineers, Inc.

NITROGEN REMOVAL USING TERTIARY FILTRATION. Suzie Hatch & Colum Kearney. Sydney Water Corporation

STUDY FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT USING SOME COAGULANTS

Membrane Bio-Reactors (MBRs) The Future of Wastewater Technology, Science and Economy Aspects

Startup and Performance of the World s first Large Scale Primary Dissolved Air Floatation Clarifier ABSTRACT KEYWORDS INTRODUCTION

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

Pilot Testing Reveals Alternative Methods to Meet Wisconsin s Low Level Phosphorus Limits

Table of Contents. 4.2 Biological Phosphorus Removal In Wastewater. 4.6 Nitrification and Denitrification in Wastewater

Troubleshooting Activated Sludge Processes. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

AMMONIA REMOVAL USING MLE PROCESS EXPERIENCES AT BALLARAT NORTH. David Reyne. Central Highlands Water Authority

Chapter 2: Description of Treatment Facilities

Presence And Effects Of Aromatic Hydrocarbons On Sewage Treatment Efficiency

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

COMPARISON OF PROCESS ALTERNATIVES FOR ENHANCED NUTRIENT REMOVAL: PERSPECTIVES ON ENERGY REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS

A H. Marcela Velázquez-Carrillo Consultant to Mountain Systems Inc. on the application of Proficy for Water Treatment

Liquid Phase Collection System Odor Control 101

Transcription:

A Review of the Current State of Knowledge on Phosphorus Removal Sam Jeyanayagam, Ph.D., P.E., BCEE Senior Associate Malcolm Pirnie sjeyanayagam@pirnie.com Phone: (614) 430-2611 OWEA Conference 16 June 2010

Available Phosphorous Removal Methods Two methods available Chemical Phosphorous Removal Enhanced Biological Phosphorous Removal Basicconcept: Soluble P Particulate P lphosphorus removal occurs when sludge is wasted

Presentation Outline Chemical Phosphorus Removal Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) Take Home Messages

Presentation Outline Chemical Phosphorus Removal Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) Take Home Messages

Chemical Phosphorus Removal Traditional Explanation Primary reaction: Chemical (Al, Fe) Soluble P Insoluble Metal Phosphate Secondary reaction: Alkalinity Chemical (Al, Fe) These reactions do not adequately explain higher P removal observed at WWTPs. Insoluble Metal hydroxide

Chemical Phosphorus Removal Modern Explanation Predominant reactions Chemical (Al, Fe) Alkalinity Hydrous Metal Oxide (HMO) Soluble P adsorbs to HMO reactive sites Minor reaction Co-precipitation: HMO enmeshes P containing colloidal particles: P precipitate Bugs

Chemical Phosphorus Removal Modern Explanation Chemical Chemical HMO HMO HMO HMO HMO HMO Particle Adsorbed Soluble P P P P Entrapped Particulate P P P P P P

Commonly Used Chemicals Iron Compounds Ferric Salt Ferrous Salt Waste Pickle Liquor Aluminum compounds Alum Sodium Aluminate Poly Aluminum Chloride (PAC) Lime Polymers

Chemical Requirements Mole Fe:Mole Sol. P Removed 4.0 2.0 1.8 1.0 0.0 Excess dose for competing reactions Stoichiometric dose Best fit curve based on plant data (WEF) Higher chemical dose Higher sludge production Higher alkalinity consumption 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Effluent Soluble P (mg/l) Lower chemical dose Lower sludge production Lower alkalinity consumption

Presentation Outline Chemical Phosphorus Removal Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) Take Home Messages

Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal Phosphorus is removed in ALL biological processes Due to metabolic requirements Enhanced Biological P Removal (EBPR) is: Removal exceeding metabolic requirements - Luxury P removal - Excess P removal - Enhanced Biological P removal (EBPR) - Bio-P Mediated by Phosphorous Accumulating Organisms (PAOs)

Enhanced Biological P Removal (EBPR) Mechanism Rapidly Biodegradable Substrate (VFAs) P Release O2 or NO 3 CO2 + H2O PHB Energy PHB Energy Excess P Uptake Polyphosphate Anaerobic Zone Cell Synthesis Polyphosphate Aerobic or Anoxic Zone Why EBPR works? Energy Released by PHB oxidation is 24-36 times energy required for PHB storage

EBPR Mechanism VFA uptake & storage P release Feeding Battery charging Anaerobic Aerobic Stored Food oxidized Excess P Uptake Cell synthesis Starving Battery discharging Waste Sludge Loaded with P

Six Prerequisites for Reliable EBPR 1. Consistent and adequate supply of VFAs Minimum requirements to achieve 1 mg/l efflux. TP: l cbod: P 25:1 l COD:TP 45:1 l VFA:TP 10:1 l rbcod:tp 15:1 Variable supply of VFAs stress the PAOs & delays recovery Causes: - Excessive BOD removal in the primary clarifier - Wet weather flows & snow melts - High recycle P loads 14

Six Prerequisites for Reliable EBPR 2. Integrity of Anaerobic Zone DO and NO 3 in anaerobic zone Influent RAS Back mixing Mixer too large Screw Pump DO NO 3 -N, DO Anaerobic Aerobic Clarifier RAS NO 3 -N, DO

Backmixing 4 6 for 15 SWD Foam & scum accumulation High DO Backflow Anaerobic Aerobic

Six Prerequisites for Reliable EBPR 3. Minimize secondary P release Conditions that favor secondary release Anaerobic conditions Deep clarifier sludge blanket Unaerated sludge storage Co-settling PS & WAS in primary clarifier Anaerobic digestion Long aerobic conditions Aerobic zone too large Long aerated sludge storage 18

All EBPR Plants must Have a Plan to Manage/Treat Recycle Loads Equalization EBPR System Thickening & Dewatering Operations Filtrate/ Centrate Reschedule Operations Chemical P Removal Phosphorus Recovery

Six Prerequisites for Reliable EBPR 4. Maximize solids capture Determined by EBPR or Chem-P removal efficiency Soluble-P Determined by solids capture efficiency (clarifier & filter) Particulate P Effluent TP

Importance of Tight Solids Control Effluent Particulate P, mg/l 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Effluent TP = Dissolved P + Particulate P 0.9 10% P 8% P 6% P 4% P 2% P 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Effluent TSS, mg/l 21

Six Prerequisites for Reliable EBPR 5. Minimize Competition from Glycogen Accumulating Organisms (GAOs) Anaerobic Aerobic PAOs GAOs VFA uptake & storage P Release VFA uptake & storage No P release Excess P Uptake Stored food oxidized No excess P uptake Stored food oxidized Adequate VFAs may not necessarily ensure reliable EBPR

Conditions Thought to Favor GAO Dominance Warm temperatures Long SRT Long Anoxic and anaerobic HRTs Variable supply of VFAs Continued use of acetic acid ph significantly less than 7

Six Prerequisites for Reliable EBPR 6. Aerobic zone design Anaerobic Aerobic Staging increases EBPR efficiency Provide air where required: - Maintain high DO in the initial zone to satisfy high demand - Taper aeration in the subsequent zones 24

Presentation Outline Chemical Phosphorus Removal Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) Take Home Messages

Take Home Messages Chemical dose should be based on jar-testing Poor mixing is often the cause of excessive chemical dose Avoid indiscriminate use of chemical to supplement EBPR Iron salts can lower UV transmittance Chemical addition increases the inert fraction of the MLSS requiring higher MLSS P removal continues even after chemical feed is terminated due to residual chemical in the RAS.

Take Home Messages Six key factors impact EBPR 1. Adequate VFAs 2. Integrity of the aerobic zone 3. Secondary release 4. Solids capture 5. Microbial competition (GAO) 6. Air distribution Decreasing order of importance EBPR entails complex microbial interaction. Designers provide operational flexibility Operators - use operational flexibility provided. Eliminate solids handling bottlenecks Use process automation judiciously It s a spider web out there!

Questions? Safety matters in everything we do!