PRM IMPLEMENTATION: QUALITY CONTROL

Similar documents
Pesticides: Method Validation and Quality Control

A2LA. R231 Specific Requirements: Threat Agent Testing Laboratory Accreditation Program. December 6, 2017

Food. Overview. Optimizing Production and Freezing Processes for the Food Industry. Food

RAJESH NAIR DIRECTOR CALF-NDDB, ANAND, GUJARAT

Revision of 30 April 2013 draft, 4 November 2013

Open/flexible scope accreditation (pesticide residue tests) following EN-ISO 17025: The Spanish experience

EU Document on Analytical Quality Control and Method Validation Procedures for Pesticide Residues Analysis in Food and Feed An update

Edward F. Askew PhD Askew Scientific Consulting

Ainvolved in many aspects of project planning, sample collection,

MODULE 2A GENERAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

Trace Metals in Waters by GFAAS, in Accordance with U.S. EPA and Health Canada Requirements

Analysis of steel and its alloys using the GB/T standard and an Agilent 5100 ICP-OES in dual view mode

VICH Topic GL2 (Validation: Methodology) GUIDELINE ON VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES: METHODOLOGY

Analysis of Illegal Dyes in Food Matrices Using Automated Online Sample Preparation with Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

Whole Soil Fertility Step-by-Step

The Release of Nickel from Stainless Steel into Cooked Foods

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE FOR THE VALIDATION OF METHODS USED BY CHEMICAL LABORATORIES IN THE FOOD, WATER AND RELATED INDUSTRIES

APPENDIX 1. Mean estimated weight (MEW) mean real weight (MRW) (g) and percentage error estimation, according to method.

How to use the TNI standards to meet essential QC elements in the MUR

Control Charts and Trend Analysis for ISO 17025

A24 CALA Checklist for Microbiology Revision 4.1 February 16, 2018

Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Field and Lab Audits

Verification of Compendial Methods

Uncertainties and certainties in GMO analytics using qpcr

Bioanalytical method validation: An updated review

The Role of Proficiency Testing in Laboratory Capacity Building in Chile

Pesticide Residues in Drinking Water. Michael F. Hare, Ph.D. Pesticides Division Texas Department of Agriculture

ANALYSIS OF PESTICIDE RESIDUES IN DRINKING WATER AS PER BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS USING THE AGILENT 7000 GC/MS/MS WITH PESTICIDES ANALYZER

2010 PNCWA Conference Bend, OR

Evaluation of the QA forms used for deposition analyses

Analytical Procedures and Methods Validation for Drugs and Biologics

Event-specific Method for the Quantification of Soybean CV127 Using Real-time PCR. Validation Report

Will Accrediting Authorities allow PT Providers to reissue a result report if the lab identifies a reporting problem? Sponsor: Bill Hall Resolution:

Laboratory Validation. Chapter 16

Validation Report 19

California State University, Sacramento: Lead Study

Available Laboratory Methods for Soil Gas Analysis

Ligand Binding Assays: Summary and Consensus from the Bioanalytical Workshop (CC V)

Medical Cannabis Laboratory Approval Program

Request for Proposal (RFP) Handbook and Training. TNI Educational Delivery System (EDS) Webinars and Webcasts June 2017

Appendix B AMEC Laboratory Quality Assurance/Control Program

METHOD VALIDATION: AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE MEASUREMENT PROCESS. Presented by : Jerry Parr, The NELAC Institute

Michigan and Ohio Specialty Crops Growers Study

Cover Crops Grow Your Own Fertilizer

Guidelines on Quality Assurance/Quality Control for The Environmental Measurements of Dioxins

Terms and conditions for laboratories appointed to undertake the testing of compost under the Compost Certification Scheme aligned to PAS 100 and the

GLP/SC/01 Basic statistical tools for analytical chemistry (2 days)

Application note. Guideline for validation of analytical methods using Cedex Bio, Cedex Bio HT, and Cedex HiRes Analyzers.

ISO General Requirements for Competence of Testing Laboratories Procedure

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

OBSERVATIONS OF AN OPERATOR IN THE LAB IMPROVING LABORATORY RESULTS. Shane Jordan-Hill. Merck Millipore

QUALITY MANUAL FOR Department of Materials Testing and Evaluation. Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Global Minor-Use Summit

Team A2 : Tiered Approaches to Method Validation

Sprint analysis of lubricating oils using the Thermo Scientific icap 7600 ICP-OES

Tyler Trent, Applications Sales Specialist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

Market opportunities for Queensland agribusiness from FTAs with China, Japan and South Korea. Queensland Production

Analytical Procedures and Methods Validation for Drugs and Biologics

CORESTA RECOMMENDED METHOD N 61

Pesticide Registration for Minor Crops and Crop Grouping Effort in Japan. Naoki Motoyama Chiba University, Japan

Roundtable Discussion Method Validation & Verification

Selenium in Natural Waters by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption using EPA Method 200.9

US EPA Method using the Thermo Scientific icap 7600 ICP-OES Duo

Their Metabolites in Salmon, Catfish, and. Action Method : Collaborative Study. WENDY C. ANDERSEN FDA - Animal Drugs Research Center, CO

Validation of a concentration assay using Biacore C

Volatile Organic Compounds in Solids PBM

EURL-FA Guide: Protocol for verification studies of singlelaboratory/in-house

Size Exclusion Chromatography of Biosimilar and Innovator Insulin Using the Agilent AdvanceBio SEC column

If you need to reschedule at any time, please contact the Total Joint Specialist (320) extension

A Sub-picogram Quantification Method for Desmopressin in Plasma using the SCIEX Triple Quad 6500 System

Composition Analysis of Animal Feed by HR ICP-OES

A RAPID METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF CHLORAMPHENICOL RESIDUES IN BLACK TIGER SHRIMP

Quantitation of cyanotoxins in drinking water according to EPA 544 guidelines

AppNote 5/2006 ABSTRACT

Quantitative determination of residual 2-(2-chloroethoxy) ethanol (CEE) in quetiapine fumarate by gas chromatogaraphy

The Determination of Toxic Metals in Waters and Wastes by Furnace Atomic Absorption

LabGuide 13 How to Verify Performance Specifications

Determination of Chloramphenicol and Thiamphenicol Residues in Fish, Shrimp and Milk by ESI-LCMSMS

CERTIFICATION. Certificate No. The AOAC Research Institute hereby certifies that the performance of the test kit known as: RIDASCREEN Gliadin

Phase Appropriate Method Validation

Validation Report 16

HPLC METHODOLOGY MANUAL

Error Analysis and Data Quality

Quality Management. Efficient Quality Management in a Regulated Environment

The Role of Quality Assurance in Water Quality Assessment

CASE-STUDY- VALIDATION of PCR based methodology. Beata Surmacz-Cordle Senior Analytical Development Scientist

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460

QUALITY CONTROL & STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES EHI JAMES OCHEIKWU.

Questionnaire Layout:

Rapid Extraction of Therapeutic Oligonucleotides from Primary Tissues for LC/ MS Analysis Using Clarity OTX, an Oligonucleotide Extraction Cartridge

APPLICATION NOTE. UOP : Analysis of Trace CO and CO 2 in bulk H 2 and Light Gaseous Hydrocarbons by GC

Review on Analytical Method Development and Validation.

Accuracy and Precision. Dilution Error in Error in Factor Accuracy Precision 200 <2% <2%

ICP Expert software. Technical Overview. Introduction

Ligand Binding Assay strategies to support early drug development. Sarah Childs, Tina Panchal, Rose Edwards GlaxoSmithkline

Considering a U-Pick. Laurie Elliott, Owner, The Pickery Terre Haute, IN

November Prepared By: :

The 2016 TNI Laboratory Accreditation Standard. November 15, 2017

SUGGESTIONS FOR REDUCTION OF ANALYTICAL COSTS BY ELIMINATION OF UNNECESSARY QUALITY CONTROL (QC) SAMPLES

Transcription:

PRM IMPLEMENTATION: QUALITY CONTROL -----Quality Control in Laboratory Testing Agro-Environmental Quality Supervision & Testing Center, MOA (Tianjin) Zeying He hezeying222308@163.com

Contents: 1. Overview 2. Quality Control Measures in Laboratory

Overview

1. Concept of quality control (QC) QC procedures are specific tools that used to obtain reliable laboratory data based on modern scientific management and statistical methods. QC guarantees that the analytical errors are within allowed values and good accuracy and precision are obtained to ensure the intended use of the data.

2. Essence of QC Guarantee the traceability of testing results Achieving controllability of testing quality QC in laboratory is the whole procedures that conducting quality management system documentation, implementing Quality Policy, fulfilling Quality target, keep quality management system and constant improvement of these procedures. The aim of QC is reduce experimental error

3. Classification of Error Systematic Error Error=observed value-true value Random Error Systematic error affect accuracy, random error affect precision. Good precision do not ensure high accuracy; Bad precision, bad accuracy; Good precision result in good accuracy if there is no systematic error.

4. Relationship between measuring and error Accuracy is relative, absolute accuracy do not exist. Errors are controllable, and controllable errors are acceptable. Laboratory Technicians should be familiar with all the procedures involved in testing. Testing quality can be improved by effective quality management and control.

Quality Control Measures in Laboratory

Within laboratory QC In-house QC Discover random errors and new systematic errors Evaluation of the stability of testing quality is the fundamental and necessity of laboratory testing. Inter-laboratories QC External QC Discover systematic errors and the comparability between different labs Evaluate the testing system and analysis ability Compare with standard laboratory is an effective way of calibration

Within-laboratory QC 1. Validation of new analytical method 2. QC in the process of testing

1. Validation of new analytical method Laboratory should validate the performance of a new method. Validation parameters including : Accuracy, precision, sensitivity, linear range, et. al

If there is missing of detailed procedures in the new method, which could affect the testing results, the detailed procedures should be written into Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) as supplement to standard method. SOP Detailed description of key conditions and procedures Description of method deviation

A. Selection of matrix International organizations and domestic administrations have specified representative matrices for method validation. Appropriate matrices can be chosen from the table according to the matrix category.

Category Matrix Representative variety meat muscle tissue pork, mutton, horsemeat, chicken, duck meat, turkey fishery products haddock, salmon, trout, shrimp, crab, shellfish high water content plant origin food organ fat bulb vegetable Fruited vegetable/melon Leafy vegetable stem vegetable Fresh legume vegetable liver, kidney fat onion tomato, cucumber, green pepper lettuce, spinach leek, celery, asparagus pea with pod, beggerweed, snow bean, broad bean, kidney bean bakery product cake bread biscuit cake, moon cake bread biscuit flavoring soybean sauce soybean sauce, oyster sauce, fish sauce

B. Selection of blank matrix Ideal blank sample should be the same matrix category with the sample to be tested. There should be no target analytes in the blank sample and the constitutions should not interfere the testing. When the LOQ is lower than 1/3 limit value, the area (or height)of interfere peaks should lower than 1/10 of the area (or height) of LOQ When the LOQ is higher than 1/3 limit value, the area (or height)of interfere peaks should lower than 1/3 of the area (or height) of LOQ For illegal additive or banned pesticides and pharmaceuticals, the area (or height)of interfere peaks should lower than 1/3 of the area (or height) of MRPL(or LOQ by administration) When there is interferences in blank samples, the interference should be deducted

C. Accuracy By Certified reference material (CRM) Accuracy was evaluated by the use of CRM subjected to the entire analytical process in replicates (n 6). The observed results should be within the allowable range of the CRM.

By matrix spike Accuracy is evaluated by calculating recoveries of the analytes spiked into blank samples. Recoveries are determined by spiking experiment. Three spiking levels (n 6 for each level) are needed. The recoveries should meet requirement of accuracy.

Spiking level setting: For restricted and banned pesticides, the recommended spiking levels are: LOQ, 2*LOQ, 10*LOQ. For pesticides having MRL, the recommended spiking levels are: 1/2MRL, MRL, 2MRL. For multiresidue analysis, there are different MRLs, under this circumstances, the recommended spiking levels are: 1/2MRL (lowest MRL), MRL (lowest MRL), 2MRL (higest MRL).

Table 1 Recovery requirement of different spiking levels Spiking levels mg/kg Recovery Range % RSD % 0.001 50~120 35 >0.001 0.01 60~120 30 >0.01 0.1 70~120 20 >0.1 1 70~110 15 >1 70~110 10

D. Precision (repeatability/ reproducibility) Internal repeatability can be evaluated by duplicate analysis of parallel spiked samples. Reproducibility between different laboratories can be evaluated by inter-laboratory comparison (e.g.3-5 labs).

Table 2 Repeatability at different residue levels Concentration mg/kg RSD % 0.001 36 >0.001 0.01 32 >0.01 0.1 22 >0.1 1 18 >1 14 Table 3 Reproducibility at different residue levels Concentration mg/kg RSD % 0.001 54 >0.001 0.01 46 >0.01 0.1 34 >0.1 1 25 >1 19

E. Specificity The ability of discriminate between the analyte and other compounds.

F. Sensitivity LOQ: >10*S/N, matrix based standard, not solvent standard LOQ< MRL(official limit)-3*sd LOQ should be validated (accuracy, precision)

G. Linearity Calibration curve, residues < ±20% Cover concentration range of target analyte, including 0.5*MRL, MRL, 2*MRL Recoveries should be considered at lowest and highest calibration level Calibration function (non weighed, 1/x)

H. Single-level calibration Accurate results can be obtained when the response of analyte is close to that of single level standard (within ±30%). Satisfactory recovery (<100%) can be obtained at LCL

2. QC during the process of testing A. Requirement of QC samples Known composition and content of analyte Can be used for repeatability Can be used to evaluate accuracy during testing

B. Control Samples in QC Including but not limited to: a. reagent blank b. blank sample c. CRM d. incurred sample e. spiked sample/fortified blank/blank spike f. blind spike/blind sample (could be d or e)

C. Application of control samples Control sample is analyzed in an identical manner as a sample and is used to document laboratory performance. For each batch samples, control samples must be analyzed. a, b and at least one of the other four control samples must be used.

D. Application of spiked sample For single analyte analysis: Pesticide: spiking level close to LOQ pesticide with MRL: LOQ, 50-100% MRL Incurred sample: spiking level close to target residue level

For multiresidue analysis: Spike all or part of analytes (representative analytes) Spike all the analytes over a half-a-year/1-year period

E. Injection order Appropriate sequence arrangement---avoid crosscontamination Recommended injection order: reagent blank, blank sample, spiked sample (incurred sample), blank sample(reagent blank)again, real sample, spiked sample(incurred sample) In one batch, control samples are analyzed in intervals (e.g. 10 samples interval) when the batch is large.

Inter-laboratory QC Proficiency Test Twice a year Over 100 laboratories nationwide Two matrices 10 out of 80+ PRM pesticides