PROJECTS. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location

Similar documents
Chapter 1 Introduction

Eight County Freight Plan

Waterways 1 Water Transportation History

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

HORIZON 2030: Plan Projects November 2005

Eric Thomas Benchmark River and Rail Terminals

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports

The Point Intermodal River Port Facility at the Port of Huntington Project Benefit Cost Summary

U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration

Centered on global trade.

Missouri Freight Transportation Economy on the Move. Waterway Freight. Missouri Economic Research and Information Center

LOUISIANA FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN Donald Vary. March 1, 2016

INLAND WATERWAYS TRANSPORTATION: Our Competitive Advantage. Delbert R Wilkins Canal Barge Company Big River Moves Leadership Forum April 15, 2013

Rail - What Does the Future Bring?

North Carolina Statewide Freight Plan

total 2011 tonnage. The total value of Illinois domestic internal commodity movements was over $21.2 billion.

Failure to Act. Of current Investment Trends in. Airports, Inland Waterways, and Marine Ports. Infrastructure EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Central Minnesota. Regional Freight Profile

Corridors of Statewide Significance: Introduction

A MODAL COMPARISON OF DOMESTIC FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION EFFECTS ON THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. November 2007

BHJ Freight Study. Ohio Conference on Freight

Ohio Maritime Study. Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference (OTEC) October 10, 2017 Columbus, OH

Review of Inland Navigation Needs: Shipper and Carrier Perspectives

DRAFT NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION FREIGHT PLAN. July 2016

Class I Railroad Statistics

OKI Regional Freight Plan August Table of Contents

SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA REGIONAL FREIGHT PLAN

EXISTING AND FUTURE FREIGHT GOODS MOVEMENT ASSESSMENT

AAPA Facilities Engineering Seminar & Expo

NHS Intermodal Freight Connectors A Report to Congress

Disaggregate State Level Freight Data to County Level

2016 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, October 24-25, Donna Brown-Martin, Director Bureau of Planning and Economic Development

State of Idaho Profile

Beaver County Freight Profile

CORE MPO Freight Transportation Plan. Project Advisory Committee

1.1 Stakeholder Involvement

This plan document is available at: Oklahoma Department of Transportation Planning and Research Division 200 NE 21 st Street Oklahoma City, OK 73105

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

CDTC NEW VISIONS FREIGHT & GOODS MOVEMENT

New York State Freight Transportation Plan. NYSAMPO Meeting. NYSAMPO Meeting June 21, 2017

Delaware Department of Transportation Agriculture Supply Chain Study: Transportation Supply Chain Analysis ihs.com

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

To provide an update on the progress of the Peel Goods Movement Task Force and the Peel Goods Movement Strategic Plan.

Modeling Applications for Freight Tennessee DOT Freight Planning

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: PRIORITIZING FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

Trade & Logistics: Understanding the Industry

Economic Impact Analysis of Short Line Railroads. Louisiana State University - Research Team Dr. Jared Llorens Dr. Jim Richardson Mr.

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN REGION FREIGHT STUDY SUMMARY REPORT

Freight Transportation Megatrends

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PASSENGER RAIL FREIGHT RAIL. Executive Summary.

INDIANA FACTS. (July 2015, Seasonally Adjusted)

CRITICAL RURAL FREIGHT CORRIDORS SWRPC Transportation Advisory Committee May 7, 2018

NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. New Jersey Statewide Strategic Freight Rail Plan

Freight Movement Element

USDA s Perspective on Agricultural Transportation Priorities

Darrell Wilson AVP Government Relations The Future of Freight Panel August 26 th, 2014

The Des Moines Metropolitan Organization. Rail Market Analysis

Inland Port Cargo Complex

BIOSCIENCE. Department of Commerce. KansasCommerce.com/KBIZ

Metropolitan Planning Organizations & Statewide Freight Integrating Local and State Planning Efforts. October 25, 2015

District One Freight Mobility & Trade Study and Implementation Plan Joint Charlotte & Sarasota/Manatee MPO Board Meeting January 25, 2016 Keith

Alabama State Port Authority

Technical Report 7: Freight Mobility Final Adopted Plan

Ohio Maritime Study (ODOT PID: )

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

IMPORTANCE OF FREIGHT IN VIRGINIA

Exhibit A - Scope of Service Office of Freight, Logistics and Passenger Operations Consultant

FREIGHT CORRIDORS AND GATEWAYS: DEVELOPMENT APPROACH AND EVALUATION CRITERIA COMPARISON IN NORTH AMERICA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION

Chapter 5 Freight Movement

FREIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS W.E. # C

Twin Cities Metro Freight Study Summary of Results

Are We Prepared for the Energy Movements? JEANNIE BECKETT THE BECKETT GROUP ENERGY EXPORT PERMITTING IN THE NW JUNE SEA-TAC CONFERENCE CENTER

GNC Coalition Update. Washington Public Ports Association Trade and Transportation Committee November 18, 2015

CSX Montreal Expansion Ohio Conference on Freight September 2013

Inland Port Impact Study

Performance Management & Goals

Greene County Freight Profile

Technical Memorandum MULTIMODAL NEEDS. Prepared for: Oklahoma Department of Transportation. Prepared by:

I-710 Project Committee Meeting

Canaveral Port Authority: Rail Extension Update

TRANSPORTATION PLAN Donald Vary

U.S. 70 Corridor Economic Assessment

The Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG) 2035 Plan: Roadways Element

National Capital Region Freight Plan

INDUSTRIAL OUTPARCELS AVAILABLE WITH RAIL ACCESS BUILD TO SUIT OPTIONS. The Moser Group, Inc.

Revenue Freight Traffic Statistics for the Major North American Railroads. Weekly Railroad Traffic

Sabbir Saiyed, PhD., P.Eng. Manager, Transportation System Planning

Commodity Flow Modeling William R. Black Indiana University INTRODUCTION

ST. LOUIS REGIONAL FREIGHT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

To provide an update on the progress of the Peel Goods Movement Task Force and Peel Goods Movement Strategic Plan.

Freight Infrastructure Investment Plan

Maritime Transportation Research Bank

Factors Affecting Transportation Decisions. Transportation in a Supply Chain. Transportation Modes. Road freight transport Europe

Morris County Freight Profile

Federal surface transportation legislation, which emphasized freight as a factor that states must consider in the transportation planning process;

PORT OF NEW YORK & NEW JERSEY RAIL FACILITY EXPANSION PROGRAM

The Emergence of. Florida s Seaports and Inland Ports. Florida League of Cities - International Relations Committee November 17, 2011

Bangladesh Regional Waterway Transport Project. Charles Kunaka Senior Trade Specialist Global Product Specialist - Connectivity

Recognizing Stakeholders and Their Role within the Freight Transportation System

Transcription:

PROJECTS Freight The economy of the Louisville KY-IN) Metropolitan Planning Area MPA), similar to that of the United States as a whole, is largely dependent on the efficient, reliable, and safe movement of freight. Goods move from the supplier to the consumer through a complex network of transportation service providers and infrastructure. Shipments may consist of small packages or bulk items, finished products or raw materials, but all will require some form of transportation to move them from origin to destination. Some shipments will begin and end within the MPA, while others will either originate or terminate there, and the remainder will simply pass through it. Horizon 2030 includes strategies to both maintain and enhance the transportation system used for freight movement, an increasingly essential activity in a strong and competitive global economy. Freight and passengers use much of the same transportation network. Often, both freight and passenger modes will experience the same system congestion, bottlenecks, access, and safety problems. In such cases, one remedy may well address the needs of both types of system users. For example, most maintenance, operations, roadway capacity, and safety projects that will directly benefit the traveling public will benefit freight users as well. Horizon 2030 contains many projects that will preserve and improve the transportation system for both people and freight. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location Several planning tools have been developed to aid in supporting safe and efficient freight movement in the Louisville KY-IN) MPA. Among these are the designation of freight as HORIZON 2030: Freight 5-1

a Regional Priority in Horizon 2030, the development of the KIPDA Freight Corridor System, and the development of the KIPDA Freight Resource Network. Conditions Favorable to Goods Movement Location has played a major role in the development of the Louisville KY-IN) MPA into a major freight movement and logistics hub. The area is centrally located within the United States. Over two-thirds of the nation s population is within a day s drive of Louisville, placing the area in close proximity to major manufacturing and consumer markets. The location of the original core settlement along the navigable Ohio River, particularly, near the Falls of the Ohio, encouraged a significant waterborne commerce and often necessitated the transshipment of goods. Three major interstate highway routes intersect in Louisville: I-, I-, and I-71, providing direct highway access to major cities in all directions. All major shipping modes are represented in the Louisville KY-IN) MPA. While the traveling public is probably most familiar with the trucks they see on the roadway, freight is also transported here by rail, air, water, pipeline, and a combination of modes, known as intermodal. It is this wide range of available transportation modes that has made Louisville and the surrounding area so attractive to major manufacturers, warehousing and distribution operations, and third party logistics providers. Such modal diversity also requires an equally diverse set of transportation strategies to ensure that goods continue to flow reliably, safely, and smoothly. Freight Modes Service time, delivery area, transport costs, and characteristics of the commodities, are some of the considerations that determine the mode, or combination of modes, used to ship goods. In general, the most high value, light weight, most time sensitive cargo, such as finished, perishable consumer products and overnight mail parcels, will be shipped by air, while water and pipeline cargoes tend to be lower value, heavier, less time sensitive raw materials. Freight Modes: Forecasts Freight volumes and cargo values are on the rise, while modal shares are shifting. This is the future of freight in the United States as forecast by the Federal Highway Administration FHWA) Freight Analysis Framework, or FAF. The FAF forecasts 2010 and 2020 freight volumes and values by mode. For illustrative purposes for Horizon 2030, the 1998 to 2020 FAF trend was extended to provide estimates for the year 2030. The volume of goods moved in the United States is increasing, placing added stress on the nation s transportation network. According to FAF-based forecasts, the total cargo volume moved is expected to increase by 14.5 billion tons, almost doubling, between 1998 and 2030. Volumes for individual freight modes may increase anywhere from 44% for domestic rail to 278% for domestic and international air over the same period. As the nation s economy continues to evolve from a manufacturing base to services, more valueadded products will move through the system to the marketplace, driving up cargo values and fueling a shift to faster, more reliable transportation modes. By 2030, overall shipment values may grow to almost 400% above 1998 levels. Triple digit percentage growth in cargo value is also expected in each of the major modal sectors, but especially for air and truck, as more high value, time sensitive goods move through the system. 5-2 HORIZON 2030:Freight

Modal shares of shipments are shifting in response to demand for faster, more flexible modes. On both a tonnage and value basis, most of the freight shipped in the United States travels by truck. In 1998, 71% of the total freight volume moved by truck, followed by 15% on rail, 8% by water, and less than 1% by air. The 2030 modal volume scenario looks much the same. The share of cargo moved by truck is expected to increase slightly, while air s overall share, still below 1%, will double. In terms of shipment value, in 1998, after truck, air was a significant share of the modal scene at 12%, followed by rail at 7%, and water at 2%. By 2030, 16% of the nation s total cargo by value will be shipped by air. Transportation demand pressures will continue to increase across all modes, but may be felt more acutely in the highway and air modes through 2030. FREIGHT SHIPMENTS BY TONS AND VALUE UNITED STATES T ONS Millions) VALUE Billion $ ) MODE 1998* 2010* 2020* 2030* * 1998* 2010* 2020* 2030* * Total 15,271 21,376 25,848 29,757 9,312 18,339 29,954 45,286 Domestic Air 9 18 26 34 545 1,308 2,246 3,459 Highway 10,439 14,930 18,130 20,837 6,6 12,746 20,241 29,936 Rail 1,954 2,528 2,894 3,158 530 848 1,230 1,718 Water 1,082 1,345 1,487 1,559 250 358 485 Total, Domestic 13,484 18,820 22,537 25,588 7,876 15,152 24,075 35,598 International Air 9 16 24 34 530 1,182 2,259 3,821 Highway 419 733 1,069 1,473 772 1,724 3,131 5,096 Rail 358 518 699 923 116 248 432 683 Water 136 199 2 329 17 34 57 88 Other*** 8 1,090 1,259 1,410 N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A Total, International 1,787 2,556 3,311 4,169 1,436 3,187 5,879 9,688 N/A data not available Note: Modal numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. *Source: 1998-2020 values FHWA Freight Analysis Framework **Source: 2030 values extrapolation of FAF forecast trend ***Other includes international shipments moved by pipeline or by unspecified modes. HORIZON 2030: Freight 5-3

Freight Modes: Rail Several rail companies serve the Louisville KY-IN) Metropolitan Planning Area. The latest Kentucky Statewide Rail Plan and Indiana Rail Plan identify eight separate companies that either operate on their own rail lines or through trackage rights on the lines of others in the MPA. Three rail companies provide service to both the Indiana and Kentucky portions of the Louisville MPA through their national networks: CSX Transportation, Norfolk Southern Railway, and the Canadian Pacific Railway trackage rights only). One carrier, the Paducah and Louisville, provides regional service between Louisville and points in western Kentucky. The remaining companies are short line railroads, each providing mostly local, switching, and terminal services within the MPA. In Indiana, these carriers include the Louisville and Indiana Railroad Company, MG Rail, Inc., and the Southern Indiana Railway, Inc., while the Louisville and Indiana Railroad a short section with trackage rights only) and the RJ Corman Railroad Company serve the Kentucky side of the Ohio River. Freight Modes: Air Three airports serve the Louisville MPA: Louisville International and Bowman Field in Kentucky and Clark Regional in Indiana. Louisville International is the largest of the three and is classified by the Federal Aviation Administration FAA) as a primary airport. Bowman Field and Clark Regional are smaller, general aviation airports that the FAA has designated as reliever airports for Louisville International. Each of the three airports handles freight, although in varying amounts. In terms of air cargo volume, Louisville International is the primary facility. In fact, according to the FAA, Louisville International currently ranks third in the United States among airports in terms of the landed weight of all-cargo operations. The United Parcel Service air sort and international logistics operation at Louisville International generates the majority of shipment volumes, while military cargo accounts for a smaller share. Bowman Field and Clark Regional are regularly used for smaller amounts of just-in-time and emergency shipments. Freight Modes: Water The Ohio River is part of the United States inland waterway system, flowing 981 miles from the confluence of the Allegheny and Monongahela rivers in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to the Mississippi River at Cairo, Illinois. The Ohio is a navigable river for its entire length due to a system of locks and dams. The McAlpine Locks and Dam is located on the Ohio River in Louisville at mile 6.8. Shallow draft barge tows are the primary traffic on the Ohio. The Louisville MPA is home to two public riverports on the Ohio River, as well as several private docks. Jefferson Riverport International encompasses over 1,800 acres and is located on the Kentucky side of the Ohio. Major commodities that pass through the Jefferson Riverport include coal, coke, slag, minerals, sand, gravel, and steel. The Clark Maritime Center is in Indiana. It covers almost 1,000 acres. Commodities handled by Clark Maritime include corn, soybeans, fertilizer, plastics, paper, iron, steel, and grain. In addition to serving as cargo transfer facilities, both riverports are designated as Foreign Trade Zones, and are home to numerous manufacturing, warehousing, and industrial tenants. 5-4 HORIZON 2030:Freight

Freight Modes: Pipeline In the Louisville KY-IN) MPA, most pipelines carry liquid petroleum products and natural gas. According to the USDOT Office of Pipeline Safety, there are 177 miles of interstate natural gas, 126 miles of intrastate natural gas, and 130 miles of interstate liquid petroleum pipelines in the MPA. Of the five counties, Jefferson has the highest combined mileage of pipelines, with 256. Bullitt and Oldham each have 68 miles, while Clark has 30 and Floyd has 10. Freight Modes: Highway/Truck Trucks are the most visible of all the freight modes in the Louisville KY-IN) MPA because they use the same highway network as transit and motorists. The roadway network is quite extensive in the Louisville MPA, providing good overall connectivity for trips of varying lengths. According to 2002 Highway Performance Monitoring System data, there were 190 centerline miles of interstates and expressways in the five county area available for interregional and intraregional travel and shipping. Arterials represented 621 centerline miles, while collectors and local roadways represented 5,084 centerline miles, serving to connect destinations within the MPA, as well as to the interstate system. Most of the time, the extensive highway network allows the almost 100 motor carriers source: INDOT) serving the Louisville area to offer efficient and reliable service. As the number of trucks on the highways increases, however, they will encounter more frequent and higher levels of congestion. The FHWA Freight Analysis Framework also forecasts truck volumes for 2010 and 2020 for the five county area. For illustrative purposes for Horizon 2030, the 1998 to 2020 FAF trend was extended to provide estimates for the year 2030. Truck volumes are expected to increase over 120% from 1998 to 2030, as compared to an 87% increase for total traffic volume. The truck mode share of the vehicle stream is also expected to increase from about 11% to almost 13%. Freight Modes: Intermodal Intermodal shipments move by a combination of two or more transportation modes. Unless a business is located along a dedicated rail siding, positioned within an airport, or has its own port, river dock, or pipeline connection, a transfer to another shipment mode will be necessary. Most often, the other mode used is truck. Each of the non-highway modes has several public and private transshipment points, or intermodal connection points, for transfer to another mode. A few of the larger intermodal facilities in the Louisville KY-IN) MPA include the following [modes available for transfer]: Campground Road and Bells Lane Petroleum and Chemical facilities [pipeline/barge/ truck] Louisville International Airport [air/truck] Norfolk Southern Intermodal facility [rail/truck] Clark Maritime Center and Jefferson Riverport International [barge/rail/truck] Planning Tools: Freight Regional Priority In August 2004, the KIPDA Transportation Policy Committee designated freight as one of six Regional Priorities to be used in the development of Horizon 2030. Strategies to encourage efficient freight movements not only address congestion, safety, and access HORIZON 2030: Freight 5-5

problems, but support economic development as well. In order to qualify as a Regional Priority for freight, a project must improve mobility within the designated KIPDA Freight Corridor System. The stated project purpose and need must indicate the intent to improve freight movement in the designated corridors. Planning Tools: KIPDA Freight Corridor System The KIPDA Freight Corridor System was created as a tool to be used in the formulation of plans and strategies to address goods movement in the Louisville MPA. The system identifies portions of the roadway network with significant truck volumes, as well as connections to intermodal facilities and major industrial areas. The FHWA Freight Analysis Framework highway network forms the backbone of the Freight Corridor System. The FAF includes roadways in the National Highway System NHS), as well as established NHS Intermodal Connectors. The FAF data also includes base 1998) and forecast 2010, 2020) total and truck volumes, which can be used to quantify current and future year freight flows relative to the system and individual facilities. Connectivity throughout the existing and planned system is integral to the success of safe and efficient freight movement. The Freight Corridor System provides a reference for the Freight Regional Priority, as well as providing an inventory of facilities, aiding in the determination of data collection needs, evaluating system performance, and identifying areas for system improvements. The system is designed to be flexible and will be enhanced and updated as necessary. Planning Tools: Freight Resource Network One tool that is currently under development to aid with freight sector outreach and inclusion is the KIPDA Freight Resource Network. The Freight Resource Network consists of a targeted database of public and private sector stakeholder contacts from across the region. These contacts serve as an information resource, providing a conduit for the exchange of information to and from transportation planning efforts. Ultimately, the Freight Resource Network will also serve as a resource from which to draw participants for freight-oriented committees. 5-6 HORIZON 2030:Freight

31 203 3 1488 524 1 1488 62 3223 403 2855 393 712 2853 2854 71 1793 335 2857 3222 62 1694 311 1817 111 CLARK COUNTY AIRPORT 2856 53 3222 393 1694 329 22 329 2 71 31 1315 53 329 2859 2 1694 841 CLARK MARITIME CENTER RIVERPORT 22 2858 1818 311 42 362 2 22 1447 71 111 62 1408 1447 71 62 30 362 1747 2050 2 3082 1447 31 2 31 42 3084 3077 11 2241 31W 28 2840 A 2048 31E 1819 61 111 BOWMAN FIELD BOWMAN FIELD 2054 2056 2803 155 A 1934 1020 2250 1531 1703 1932 A 1931 2049 A 2051 2 3069 1631 913 2801 2251 22 148 1703 3206 2051 2052 LOUISVILLEINTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LOUISVILLE AIRPORT 1727 18 2 LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY RIVERPORT AUTHORITY LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY RIVERPORT AUTHORITY 155 1631 1142 31E 1931 1931 1531 10 10 1230 8 3078 1934 2845 907 1819 18 2055 841 2 1319 1531 1450 1934 1849 1851 1230 841 1020 8 31E 1531 2814 61 2317 2053 1319 1116 6 6 1116 1450 31E 2672 1526 2706 1526 61 31W 44 1526 1020 2673 44 2674 44 1417 2723 1442 480 480 480 14 3219 1494 245 61 2724 Legend 251 KIPDA Freight Corridor System Rail 733 Street Centerline FHWA FAF Intermodal Facilities 0 434 1.5 3 6 9 12 Miles Industrial Land Use HORIZON 2030: Freight 5-7

5-8 HORIZON 2030:Freight