Chapter 5 Freight Movement

Similar documents
Central Minnesota. Regional Freight Profile

Donna Brown-Martin Bureau of Planning and Economic Development SEWRPC EJ Task Force December 8, 2015

Missouri Freight Transportation Economy on the Move. Waterway Freight. Missouri Economic Research and Information Center

Dennis Leong, Toni Rice, and Kathleen Spencer March 27, 2013

Morris County Freight Profile

Factors Affecting Transportation Decisions. Transportation in a Supply Chain. Transportation Modes. Road freight transport Europe

Eight County Freight Plan

Revenue Freight Traffic Statistics for the Major North American Railroads. Weekly Railroad Traffic

2016 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, October 24-25, Donna Brown-Martin, Director Bureau of Planning and Economic Development

PROJECTS. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location

The Economics and Regulation of the Freight Rail Industry. Third Annual Colloquium. June 16, 2017

Overview of America s Freight Railroads

Introduction to North American Rail Transportation

CTS Freight and Logistics Symposium. Minneapolis, MN November 30, 2007

Terminology. Supply Chain Resilience Transportation Interests

Darrell Wilson AVP Government Relations The Future of Freight Panel August 26 th, 2014

Appendix A: Class I Railroad Subdivisions

Railroads and Grain. Association of American Railroads June Summary

Class I Railroad Statistics

Michigan Technological University 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI

Disaggregate State Level Freight Data to County Level

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: FACILITATING TEXAS ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GLOBAL COMPETIVENESS

Multimodal Transport Institute Forum. Tom Malloy Thoroughbred Direct Intermodal Services. October 11, 2012 Los Angeles, California

Waterways 1 Water Transportation History

Federal surface transportation legislation, which emphasized freight as a factor that states must consider in the transportation planning process;

INLAND WATERWAYS TRANSPORTATION: Our Competitive Advantage. Delbert R Wilkins Canal Barge Company Big River Moves Leadership Forum April 15, 2013

Northern and Western Minnesota and NW Wisconsin Regional Freight Study

Ch.9 Physical Distribution

The Des Moines Metropolitan Organization. Rail Market Analysis

Technical Report 7: Freight Mobility Final Adopted Plan

Rail - What Does the Future Bring?

Economic Impact Analysis of Short Line Railroads. Louisiana State University - Research Team Dr. Jared Llorens Dr. Jim Richardson Mr.

Robert E. Martínez Norfolk Southern Corporation

Chapter 1 Introduction

14 th TPM Annual Conference March 2-5, 2014

The Future of Trucking in Virginia: Interstate and Intermodal Strategies

SWOT Analysis of Commodity Flow Datasets

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

Performance Management & Goals

Transform from Big Data to Good Data

ST. LOUIS REGIONAL FREIGHT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Trade & Logistics: Understanding the Industry

Massachusetts Freight Plan

Delaware Department of Transportation Agriculture Supply Chain Study: Transportation Supply Chain Analysis ihs.com

Billions of dollars per year in: Savings in shipping costs Taxes and purchases that support tens of thousands of additional jobs Avoided highway

GNC Coalition Update. Washington Public Ports Association Trade and Transportation Committee November 18, 2015

Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT) 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Final Report. Modal Shifts from the Mississippi River & Duluth/Superior to Land Transportation

Best Practices for Transportation Management

COMPASS Freight Study Client Reference: RFQ

Chapter 5 Oklahoma Economic Conditions and Freight Transportation

Notice of Tariff Change Effective January 1, 2014

Executive. Summary. Planning Our Future STATE OF RHODE ISLAND FREIGHT AND GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN. July 2016

Introduction to Transportation Systems

AAPA Facilities Engineering Seminar & Expo

Failure to Act. Of current Investment Trends in. Airports, Inland Waterways, and Marine Ports. Infrastructure EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CRITICAL RURAL FREIGHT CORRIDORS SWRPC Transportation Advisory Committee May 7, 2018

Australian and Canadian Imports and Exports: Trade and Transportation by

What do Shippers Want? Presented to Ohio Trucking Association September 19, 2016

Identifying an efficient feed distribution system in the Midwest

Rail Freight Service Review. Submission of the New Brunswick Department of Transportation

Beaver County Freight Profile

GMX (Pvt) Ltd. Profile. International Express Courier. Dear Sir/Madam AOA,

INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO THE STATE OF ALASKA FINAL REPORT. Prepared

Modeling Applications for Freight Tennessee DOT Freight Planning

Merging Logistics and Engineering Williston Basin Symposium

ABOUT RFX. A Customer-First Commitment

-16- CHAPTER 3 REVENUE GENERATION INTRODUCTION

Intermodal Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel from Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Sites 9328

An Inside View of Railway Economic Regulation in Canada

final report Binghamton Regional Freight Study Binghamton Metropolitan Transportation Study Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

THE NEW YORK, SUSQUEHANNA AND WESTERN RAILWAY

Auto Industry Opportunities & Challenges. 2 nd SIAM Automotive Logistics Conclave Greater Noida 16 th & 17 th January 2015

Commodity Flow Modeling William R. Black Indiana University INTRODUCTION

THE NEW YORK, SUSQUEHANNA AND WESTERN RAILWAY

LOUISIANA FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN Donald Vary. March 1, 2016

Centered on global trade.

Logistics Insight Corporation Romulus ODC Version 3.2 Procedure Manual Subject: Material Flow July 31, 2014

Ohio Maritime Study. Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference (OTEC) October 10, 2017 Columbus, OH

USDA s Perspective on Agricultural Transportation Priorities

INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION, USACE STYLE

UNIT TRAIN SERVICES. Tariff 5.

Rail Time Indicators A Review of Key Economic Trends Shaping Demand for Rail Transportation

SOUTH DAKOTA. Freight PLAN. Prepared by: South Dakota Department of Transportation Project Development Office

State of Idaho Profile

CREATING A BLUEPRINT FOR CARGO-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT

Norfolk Southern Industrial Development A Part of Your Economic Development Team

STATEWIDE ANALYSIS MODEL (SAM-V3) June 5, 2014 Janie Temple

Intermodal Facility Study

Chapter 9 Domestic U.S. and International Logistics

NJ State Rail Plan. New Jersey Short Line Railroad Association Briefing September 12, 2012

2009 CIITR RESEARCH BRIEF Northbound Freight Traffic Trends at the U.S.-Mexico Border

Subtask Report - Review of Sub-National Commodity Flow Data Development Efforts and National Freight-Related Data Sets.

Freight Transportation Megatrends

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING STATE FREIGHT AND RAIL PLAN NORTHEAST REGION MEETING NOTES

O & D Data. Results. Traffic Increase. Heavier Payloads. Total and Average Value of Freight Payload for Selected Highways

OKI Regional Freight Plan August Table of Contents

Greene County Freight Profile

2017 XPO Logistics, Inc.

Transcription:

Chapter 5 Freight Movement Truck passing under I-78 on Route 412 in Hellertown 34 35

Figure 7 Lehigh Valley Percent Freight Tonnage and Value by Direction, and This section details the tonnage and value of freight moved by mode and direction in and the projected tonnage and value in. 5.1 TONNAGE In order to gain a better understanding of how freight moves within the Lehigh Valley, tonnage movement by mode and direction was analyzed for and. Inbound freight is freight that originates outside the Valley but has a destination within the Valley. Internal Freight is freight that both originates and has a destination within the Lehigh Valley. Outbound freight originates within the Valley and has a destination outside the Valley. Although through freight (freight moving across the region without an origin or destination in the region) plays an important role in the region, through freight is not included in this analysis due to data limitations. As shown in Figure 7, the majority of freight in the Lehigh Valley is inbound freight and is projected to remain that way in, despite a small decrease in percentage terms. Outbound freight comprises the next highest percentage of freight, and this share is projected to increase by 8% to 4 in. Internal freight accounts for a small percentage of freight movement in the Lehigh Valley, comprising only 2% in and in. Table 3 and Table 4 break down the freight movement by mode for both and, respectively. Trucks account for the largest share of freight movement regardless of direction in both and, followed by rail, air and other modes. 5.2. VALUE In addition to tonnage, the value of freight movement was also analyzed by direction and mode for and. Figure 7 shows that, similar to tonnage, inbound freight movement accounted for the most value in, then outbound, followed by internal. In, the outbound value of freight is expected to increase in percentage terms, while the inbound percentage of value is expected to decrease and the internal value remains relatively stable. Table 5 shows that the trucks moved the largest value of freight regardless of direction, followed by rail, air and other. This ranking is projected to remain the same in, with values increasing across all modes as tonnages are projected to increase (Table 6). 36 37

Table 3 Lehigh Valley Total Freight Tonnage by Mode (thousands), % Share % Share % Share % Share Truck 20,850.10 8 882.16 98% 14,917.29 9 36,649.55 90% Rail 3,425.02 14% 14.44 2% 768.91 4,208.38 Air 8.51 <1% - - 1.67 <1% 10.18 <1% Other* 0.01 <1% - - 0.08 <1% 0.09 <1% Total 24,283.64 100% 896.61 100% 15,687.95 100% 40,868.20 100% * Not categorized, or pipelines Table 4 Lehigh Valley Total Freight Tonnage by Mode (thousands), % Share % Share % Share % Share Truck 36,015.95 88% 2,490.58 9 35,384.75 9 73,891.28 92% Rail 4,758.13 12% 18.84 1% 1,504.56 4% 6,281.53 8% Air 17.19 <1% - - 2.98 <1% 20.17 0% Other* 0.04 <1% - - 0.27 <1% 0.31 0% Total 40,791.31 100% 2,509.41 36,892.57 100% 80,193.29 100% * Not categorized, or pipelines Table 5 Lehigh Valley Total Freight Value by Mode (millions), * % Share % Share % Share % Share Truck $21,708 78% $2,640 100% $19,329 94% $43,679 8 Rail $4,806 1 $7 0% $930 $5,743 Air $1,426 - - $242 1% $1,668 Other** - - - - - - - - Total $27,940 100% $2,647 100% $20,501 100% $51,090 100% *Not indexed for inflation **Not categorized, or pipelines Table 6 Lehigh Valley Total Freight Value by Mode (millions), * % Share % Share % Share % Share Truck $48,984 81% $7,644 100% $58,764 9 $115,394 8 Rail $8,380 14% $8 0% $1,954 $10,342 8% Air $3,408 - - $437 1% $3,845 Other** - - - - $1 0% $1 0% Total $60,773 100% $7,652 100% $61,156 100% $129,583 100% *Not indexed for inflation Freight awaiting shipment at L+M Fabrication in Bath 38 **Not categorized, or pipelines 39

Figure 8 Lehigh Valley Top Commodities, and 5.3 COMMODITIES This section analyzes the top five commodities moved by mode and direction for and the projected commodities in. This provides an overview of the types of goods moving, and projected to move, in the Lehigh Valley. 5.3.1 Highway Commodity Movement As previously discussed, truck was the predominant mode for moving freight, both in terms of tonnage and value, and is projected to remain so. The top five inbound truck commodities by tonnage and by value are illustrated in Figure 9 and Figure 10 for and, respectively. Chapter 12 provides the Transearch Analysis for the region, providing more detail regarding the data and analysis methodology. The top five inbound commodities by truck account for 5 of the total commodities by tonnage in and 58% in. The top five commodities remain relatively the same from to with the exception of rail intermodal drayage from ramp, replacing gravel or sand. The top five commodities by value are similar to the top five by tonnage. Figure 11 and Figure 12 illustrate the top five outbound truck commodities by tonnage and value for and, respectively. The top five commodities leaving the Lehigh Valley via truck account for 58% by tonnage and 62% by value in. Warehousing and rail intermodal drayage represent a large percentage, both by tonnage and value, of the commodities moving out of the region. This reflects the significant presence of warehousing industries in the region as well as the importance of intermodal movements. 5.3.2 Rail Commodity Movement In, rail contributed of the total tons of freight movement into, out of and within the Lehigh Valley. This is expected to decrease to 8% by. The top five inbound rail commodities by tonnage and by value are illustrated in Figure 13 and Figure 14 for and, respectively. Figure 15 and Figure 16 illustrate the top five outbound rail commodities by tonnage and value for and, respectively. In, the top five commodities account for more than 5 by tonnage and 68% by value. 40 41

Broken Stone or Riprap Processed Milk Gravel or Sand Processed Milk Broken Stone or Riprap Current Carrying Wiring Equipment 8,566 41% 15,235 42% 686 1,735 1,195 1,942 2,036 6,286 30% 2,082 8,696 24% 6,147 1 2,261 $11,768 54% $25,151 52% $1,058 $2,065 4% $2,881 1 $7,336 1 $2,331 Figure 9 Top Five Lehigh Valley Inbound Truck Commodities by Tonnage and Value $1,859 $1,810 8% $6,881 14% Figure 10 $4,511 $3,040 6,300 42% 3,937 2 $7,312 38% $528 $632 $1,976 $4,473 2 Figure 11 12,668 3 894 1,683 1,057 10,701 30% $4,407 2 Figure 12 1,778 2,494 1,046 3,159 4,584 1 Top Five Lehigh Valley Outbound Truck Commodities by Tonnage and Value $17,018 2 $1,910 $2,254 4% $6,211 $19,390 3 $11,980 20% 42 Broken Stone or Riprap Processed Milk Solid State Semiconductors Broken Stone or Riprap Current Carrying Wiring Equipment 43

Bituminous Coal Grain Paper Semi-trailers Returned Empty Freight Forwarder Traffic Industrial Pumps Misc. Fabricated Textile Products 661 1 1,593 4 395 12% 2,431 51% 205 281 226 761 1 346 328 506 452 $1,516 32% $220 $279 $2,247 2 $396 $503 $602 $354 $798 $443 $1,994 41% Figure 13 Top Five Lehigh Valley Inbound Rail Commodities by Tonnage and Value $3,835 4 Figure 14 31 Figure 15 24 4% 153 20% 98 1 258 1 35 2% 43 150 1 312 41% 698 4 Top Five Lehigh Valley Outbound Rail Commodities by Tonnage and Value Figure 16 189 1 283 1 $144 1 $43 $68 $80 $97 $92 $289 1 $32 1% $348 18% $236 1 498 54% $956 4 Semi-trailers Returned Empty Bituminous Coal Industrial Pumps Grain Paper Wet Corn Milling or Milo Freight Forwarder Traffic Copper or Alloy Basic Shapes 44 45