TAPPI Shipping, Receiving & Warehousing Workshop

Similar documents
Multimodal Transport Institute Forum. Tom Malloy Thoroughbred Direct Intermodal Services. October 11, 2012 Los Angeles, California

Analyst: Meilin C. Pierce Spring Recommendation: Hold Target Stock Price (12/31/2016): $120

FLEXIBILITY FOR GROWTH

Darrell Wilson AVP Government Relations The Future of Freight Panel August 26 th, 2014

A Short History of U.S. Freight Railroads

Class I Railroad Statistics

American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association. North American Short Line and Regional Railroads Industry Report

The Economics and Regulation of the Freight Rail Industry. Third Annual Colloquium. June 16, 2017

Rail - What Does the Future Bring?

Challenges and Opportunities for Canada s Freight Railways

Energy and commodity price benchmarking and market insights

Overview of America s Freight Railroads

Genesee & Wyoming. September, Genesee & Wyoming Inc.

Billions of dollars per year in: Savings in shipping costs Taxes and purchases that support tens of thousands of additional jobs Avoided highway

Robert E. Martínez Norfolk Southern Corporation

Analysis of Railway Fulfillment of Shipper Demand and Transit Times. Prepared for: Rail Freight Service Review

Introduction to North American Rail Transportation

Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) Analyst: Brandon Montler Fall Recommendation: HOLD Target Price until (12/31/2016): $94

Economic Impact Analysis of Short Line Railroads. Louisiana State University - Research Team Dr. Jared Llorens Dr. Jim Richardson Mr.

Rail Time Indicators A Review of Key Economic Trends Shaping Demand for Rail Transportation

Benchmarking Intermodal Transport in the U.S. and Europe

Union Pacific in Houston: Investing to Meet Freight Demands. Brenda Mainwaring, VP Public Affairs, November 12, 2013

Expectations for Port Customers and Clients. Dan Sheehy -NYK Line AAPA Meeting October 23, 2008

Rail Freight Service Review. Submission of the New Brunswick Department of Transportation

Are We Prepared for the Energy Movements? JEANNIE BECKETT THE BECKETT GROUP ENERGY EXPORT PERMITTING IN THE NW JUNE SEA-TAC CONFERENCE CENTER

INTERMODAL THE PRESSURE IS ON

Synergy Success: Aligning Customers, Class I s and Shortlines

Productivity Improvements in the U.S. Rail Freight Industry

THE FUTURE OF FREIGHT RAILROADING. Joseph Schwieterman Professor, DePaul University

NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. New Jersey Statewide Strategic Freight Rail Plan

The Future of Trucking in Virginia: Interstate and Intermodal Strategies

NEARS Class I Rail Network Capacity

RAIL PRICE ADVISOR. The Rail Intelligence Newsletter. AAR Historical Rail Rate Changes are Misleading

PROJECTS. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location

USDA s Perspective on Agricultural Transportation Priorities

New! Optimization for Intermodal Trucking

AUGUST 21, 2017 STB UPDATE

Railroads and Grain. Association of American Railroads June Summary

Frac Sand New Volume Impact

Commercial Benefits of Positive Train Control

American Association of Port Authorities Marine Terminal Management Program

Revenue Freight Traffic Statistics for the Major North American Railroads. Weekly Railroad Traffic

Norfolk Southern Industrial Development A Part of Your Economic Development Team

INFRASTRUCTURE OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH CO-PRODUCTION IN THE RAILWAYS

-16- CHAPTER 3 REVENUE GENERATION INTRODUCTION

C.H. Robinson. Surface Transportation

Conrail - 40 Years of Operational Success

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

EP US RAIL SERVICE ISSUES - DATA COLLECTION

National Protection and Programs Directorate Office of Cyber and Infrastructure Analysis

INDIANA HARBOR BELT RAILROAD

Factors Affecting Transportation Decisions. Transportation in a Supply Chain. Transportation Modes. Road freight transport Europe

Transporting and Handling of Soybean Exports. Bob Sinner SB&B Foods, Inc.

INLAND WATERWAYS TRANSPORTATION: Our Competitive Advantage. Delbert R Wilkins Canal Barge Company Big River Moves Leadership Forum April 15, 2013

Working with Union Pacific Railroad to Create Economic Development Opportunities in Your Community

7 Disciplines of Engineering at Union Pacific Railroad

Special Advertising Section

TRUCKING DANGEROUS GOODS IN CANADA, 2004 to 2012 Sagal Searag, Gregory Maloney and Lawrence McKeown Statistics Canada

Energy and commodity price benchmarking and market insights

Local and Regional Rail Freight Transport

Performance Management & Goals

Failure to Act. Of current Investment Trends in. Airports, Inland Waterways, and Marine Ports. Infrastructure EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Retail Supply Chains Selected Best Practices. Scotia Capital Inc. Transportation and Logistics Conference May 6, 2008

Waterways 1 Water Transportation History

The Track record. Christopher C. Barnekov RAILROAD DEREGULATION. whether it continues to enjoy increasing

14 th TPM Annual Conference March 2-5, 2014

Concerns Regarding Freight Rail Transportation and Regulation. Marvin E. Prater, Ph.D. US Department of Agriculture Transportation Services Division

OCTOBER 10, 2017 STB UPDATE

Comments on Transport Canada s Review of Canadian Rail Logistics

REACH FARTHER. Andrew Fuller, AVP Domestic Intermodal. April 2018 NEARS CONFERENCE 2018

CP SUBMISSION TO THE CANADA TRANSPORTATION ACT REVIEW PANEL

An Inside View of Railway Economic Regulation in Canada

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PASSENGER RAIL FREIGHT RAIL. Executive Summary.

Current Directions in Freight and Logistics Industry

Missouri Freight Transportation Economy on the Move. Waterway Freight. Missouri Economic Research and Information Center

Status of US Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation Planning

Ohio Maritime Study. Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference (OTEC) October 10, 2017 Columbus, OH

Reducing Air Emissions the Smart Way An Introduction to Railroad Participation in EPA s SmartWay Transport Partnership

Growing the Franchise

I know that you all understand the critical importance of the freight transportation system

SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES

Is This The New Normal?

The Point Intermodal River Port Facility at the Port of Huntington Project Benefit Cost Summary

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD 2 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD OVERVIEW

Intermodal Operations. Peter Marshall Director - Supply Chain Operations Europe, Middle East Africa Dusseldorf November 18, 2014

CTS Freight and Logistics Symposium. Minneapolis, MN November 30, 2007

GNC Coalition Update. Washington Public Ports Association Trade and Transportation Committee November 18, 2015

White Paper Series Food Logistics Industry Report

Intermodal Port Strategy AAPA Vancouver Conference November 6, 2013

Chapter 9 Domestic U.S. and International Logistics

Milton and CN A Partnership

Commodity XL Metals and Mining

A MODAL COMPARISON OF DOMESTIC FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION EFFECTS ON THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. November 2007

Delaware State Rail Plan. October 12,2011 DVRPC Freight Committee

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING EDITION

CTCO Chicago Transportation Coordination Office. Sandhouse Gang Presentation February 21, 2013

<Insert Picture Here> Rail Update. August 2014

CFE Charge Schedule. Optional Services Catalog Customer Switching and Accessorial Services. Customer Switching.

Rail Solutions and America s Future Prosperity Michael O Malley, July 12, 2008

Transcription:

TAPPI Shipping, Receiving & Warehousing Workshop Chip Davis CSX TRANSPORTATION APRIL 28, 2009

CSX TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW The largest railroad in eastern North America Service area includes all major markets in the eastern United States Covers 23 states, the District of Columbia, and two Canadian Provinces Connects to over 70 ports more ports than any other railroad Employs 32,000 dedicated individuals Operates a fleet of over 3,700 locomotives WHO IS CSXT? 2

THE RAIL INDUSTRY: PRE DE REGULATION U. S. Freight Railroad Performance At Staggers (1981 = 100) 300 250 200 150 100 50 Productivity Rates Volume Revenue Before de regulation: 1/5 of all rail track nationally in bankruptcy. Annual industry ROI at 2%. Standing derailments. 1/5 of national track operated at reduced speeds. RR market share of intercity freight down to 35%. Industry nationalization proposed. 0 '65 '68 '71 '74 '77 '80 '83 '86 '89 '92 '95 '98 '01 '04 '07 STATE OF THE RAILROAD 3

THE RAIL INDUSTRY: DE REGULATION (1980) U. S. Freight Railroad Performance At Staggers (1981 = 100) 300 Staggers Rail Act passed October (1980) Market based Pricing & Differential Pricing are born. 250 RRs and customers can now enter into confidential contracts. 200 RRs determine the most efficient routes. 150 100 Productivity Rates Streamlined procedures for rail lines sales to new shortlines. Expanded the ICC s authority to exempt categories of traffic from regulation. 50 Volume Revenue STB is established in 1995 to adjudicate rate disputes. The need for RRs to earn adequate revenues was explicitly recognized. 0 '65 '68 '71 '74 '77 '80 '83 '86 '89 '92 '95 '98 '01 '04 '07 STATE OF THE RAILROAD 4

THE RAIL INDUSTRY: POST DE REGULATION U. S. Freight Railroad Performance At Staggers (1981 = 100) 300 Post de regulation (2008) Mergers & consolidations. Pre de regulation Productivity 250 Rates reduced by 60%. 200 Accidents reduced by 2/3rds. Volume 150 Rail traffic has nearly doubled. 100 50 Productivity has tripled. Class I RRs reinvested $420 billion since 1980. Revenue Rates 0 '65 '68 '71 '74 '77 '80 '83 '86 '89 '92 '95 '98 '01 '04 '07 STATE OF THE RAILROAD 5

PROPOSAL TO INCREASE REGULATION The Railroad Competition and Service Improvement Act of 2007 Enhanced Competition or Re Regulation? Two versions introduced during the 110th Congress: House version: H. R. 2125 Senate version: S. 953 Jay Rockefeller (D WV) Chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation Jim Oberstar (D MN) Chairman of the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee STATE OF THE RAILROAD 6

ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY REQUIRES FLEXIBILITY Global Economy U.S. Industrial Production Rail Pricing Industrial production forecasted to be down 7.6% in 2009 Prior plan was based on a 3.5% decline Fuel Prices Commodity Prices Automotive Demand Downward revisions to economic indicators continue Regulatory Outlook Access to Credit Markets Housing & Construction Demand Timing of an economic recovery is impossible to predict Prudent to reduce resources to current volume levels STATE OF THE RAILROAD 7

CSXT S S BUSINESS HAS BEEN IMPACTED BY THE ECONOMY Volume Change by Major Economic Driver Change in CSX Volume Economic Driver CSX Commodity Groups % of CSX Volume (31%) Industrial Production Chemicals Metals 11% (23%) Housing Starts Forest Products Emerging Markets 11% (20%) Consumer Spending Automotive Intermodal 34% (15%) Agriculture Related Agricultural Products Phosphates & Fertilizers Food & Consumer 14% (7%) Energy Production Coal 30% STATE OF THE RAILROAD 8

THE OUTLOOK HAS SHIFTED SINCE SEPTEMBER 2009 Economic Forecasts 1.0% 0.1% 0.8% Current Forecast (1.0%) (3.5%) (4.8%) (2.5%) (3.7%) (7.6%) (9.0%) (10.0%) (15.7%) Sep Forecast Nov Forecast Jan Forecast Mar Forecast Real GDP Industrial Production Imports 2009 Q1 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 9

THROUGH THE FIRST 10 WEEKS, VOLUME IS DOWN 18% 1,397 Volume (000) First Quarter to Date 1,332 1,314 Housing slump shows no signs of recovery near term 2009 light vehicle production at lowest rate in 27 years 1,072 Inventory correction expected to continue through Q1 2006 2007 2008 2009 Weak economy is driving lower global trade 2009 Q1 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 10

MERCHANDISE REVENUES ARE DOWN 20% RPU Volume Revenue First Quarter Year Over Year Change (23%) (20%) 3% First quarter highlights Steel production cut by half Phosphates decline significantly Housing starts and overall construction remains weak 30% 39% First Quarter Volume 31% Merchandise Categories Agriculture Housing Industrial Ongoing drivers Industrial sector, housing and construction to remain weak U.S. infrastructure needs provide some opportunity 2009 Q1 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 11

COAL REVENUES ARE DOWN 2% RPU Volume Revenue First Quarter Year Over Year Change 10% 13% (7%) 77% (2%) Coal Categories Utility Export 5% First quarter highlights Weakness in export and utility coal shipments Significant decline in steel related coal, coke and iron ore Ongoing drivers Lower energy demand; utility stock piles are growing Natural gas costs declining First Quarter Volume Other 2009 Q1 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 12

AUTOMOTIVE REVENUES ARE DOWN 53% RPU First Quarter Year Over Year Change 0% First quarter highlights Volumes impacted by lower demand and tight credit Plant shutdowns continue Volume Revenue (53%) (53%) Ongoing drivers Lower consumer demand 44% 56% Automotive Categories Big-3 Inventory levels still at nearly 100 days for the Big 3 Big 3 restructuring uncertainty New Domestics First Quarter Volume 2009 Q1 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 13

INTERMODAL REVENUES ARE DOWN 22% RPU Volume First Quarter Year Over Year Change (13%) (10%) First quarter highlights Significant decline in imports with flat domestic volume RPU lower due to fuel recovery and competitive trucking prices Revenue (22%) Ongoing drivers 42% 58% Intermodal Categories Domestic Lower global trade and consumption levels Highly competitive truck market International First Quarter Volume 2009 Q1 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 14

RAILROADS REMAIN MOST CAPITAL INTENSIVE INDUSTRY Capital Spending as a Percent of Revenue Railroads Utilities Minerals Electronics Paper Chemicals Metals Lumber Automotive Food 2% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 5% 5% 13% 17% Source: Oliver Wyman based on 1997 2006 average data INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS 15

CAPITAL PLAN IS ALIGNED WITH STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 2009 2011 Capital Investment $5 Billion 9% 9% 6% 6% 70% Infrastructure Locomotives Freight Cars Strategic Positive Train Control Continues required investment in track infrastructure Focuses on locomotive rebuilds to extend life and improve reliability Invests in higher capacity, more productive cars in key markets Includes strategic capital for growth and productivity Starts positive train control (PTC) implementation to comply with regulatory mandate INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS 16

CSXT S S 2009 CAPITAL BUDGET BREAKDOWN 2009 Capital Budget $1.6 Billion 9% 10% 10% 71% Infrastructure Freight Cars Locomotives Strategic INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS 17

CSXT IS PROACTIVELY ADJUSTING SERVICE TO LOWER VOLUME REQUIREMENTS 180 Train Network Adjustments Carload Volume and Road Crew Starts 17 Carloads (000) 160 140 120 100 80 YOY volume down 2% 5% YOY volume down 15% 20% 15 13 11 9 7 Road Crew Starts (000) 60 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 Week 5 Carloads Road Crew Starts SERVICE EXPECTATIONS: TRAIN SERVICE 18

CSXT IS RIGHTSIZING ITS RESOURCES Active Locomotives Active T&E Employees 4,200 13,200 4,100 4,000 12,700 3,900 3,800 12,200 3,700 3,600 11,700 3,500 3,400 11,200 3,300 3,200 Down 15% since early October 10,700 Down 14% since early October 3,100 10,200 40 43 46 49 52 3 6 9 40 43 46 49 52 3 6 9 Week Week SERVICE EXPECTATIONS: TRAIN SERVICE 19

CSXT S S ONE PLAN REDEFINES THE TRAIN PLAN Improved network, service and execution requires a One Plan redesign: CSX is a different railroad versus 2004 when One Plan was originally implemented Traffic volume and pattern shifts also provide opportunity for adjustments Merchandise Traffic Automotive Traffic Focus remains on maximizing service and efficiency Reduce train starts, terminal handlings and route miles Increase car velocity SERVICE EXPECTATIONS: TRAIN SERVICE 20

CSXT HAS ADJUSTED ITS RESOURCES TO IMPROVE ITS OVERALL SERVICE PERFORMANCE Network Performance Service Reliability Train Velocity (mph) On-time Originations 20.0 20.1 20.8 21.6 74% 74% 79% 83% Q1 2006 Q1 2007 Q1 2008 Q1 2009 Q1 2006 Q1 2007 Q1 2008 Q1 2009 26.1 Terminal Dwell (hours) 24.5 22.7 24.1 61% On-time Arrivals 64% 69% 79% Q1 2006 Q1 2007 Q1 2008 Q1 2009 Q1 2006 Q1 2007 Q1 2008 Q1 2009 SERVICE EXPECTATIONS: LOCAL SWITCHING 21

EFFECTS ON CSXT S CUSTOMER SERVICE NEEDS The need for CSXT s Customer Service department has only increased as a result of the down economy. Customers are moving fewer cars in their pipelines. Therefore, the proper movement of each railcar in the network is even more critical. SERVICE EXPECTATIONS: CUSTOMER SERVICE STAFFING 22

SERVICE QUALITY IS DRIVING CUSTOMER SATISFACATION Customer Satisfaction Overall Score CSXT s overall rating remains near historical high 6.3 6.4 7.0 6.8 2005 2006 2007 2008 CSX Truck Other Railroads Note: Results based on an independent third party study of CSX customers Satisfaction continues to lead the peer group average Rails continue to close the service gap with trucks SERVICE EXPECTATIONS: CUSTOMER SERVICE STAFFING 23

THE INHERENT NATURE OF BOXCAR BUSINESS Many Types of Customers/Products Batch Network vs. Unit Train Truck and Rail Competitive Truck Rates Lower Intermodal conversion Poor Utilization Costly to Replace BOXCAR EQUIPMENT OUTLOOK 24

THE NORTH AMERICAN BOXCAR POOL (NABP) Pool of approximately 7,800 Boxcars Creates efficiency among members Like Characteristics: 70 Ton / Plate C Participating Carriers: CSXT, NS, UP, BNSF, CPR, KCS, FXE, KCSM Grade A Condition can only handle Grade A Commodities Managed as a common pool Is oversized in proportion to business levels Is still very complex (but getting better) New builds will be slow and later increase BOXCAR EQUIPMENT OUTLOOK 25

2057 CSXT S S BOXCAR FLEET IS LARGE North American Boxcar Fleet Fallout Year 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2037 2039 2041 2043 2045 2047 2049 2051 2053 2055 Source: UMLER BOXCAR EQUIPMENT OUTLOOK 26

CSXT S S STRATEGY: REDUCING TO TWO VARIETIES Length 50 52 60 86 RBL Canstock Reefer 50 Plate F Cushion 12 Plug Rigid Cushion Doors Plug Slider Combo Widths Plate Capacity 60 Plate F Cushion Double 8 Plug BOXCAR EQUIPMENT OUTLOOK 27

CSXT S S FOCUS DURING THESE HARD TIMES Focus on converting freight from congested highways to rail Continue to reinvest for the future Listen to the customer & cultivate relationships Seek outside funding when possible Remain flexible and creative SUMMARY 28

LONGER TERM DRIVERS FOR DEMAND STILL SEEM VALID Industrial Production Population Consumption Transportation Demand Global Trade SUMMARY 29

FINAL THOUGHTS The rail industry has changed significantly since it became deregulated in 1980. The markets are uncertain and there is no good way to predict the future. CSXT is positioning itself for recovery by continuing to Invest its capital in infrastructure and equipment Remain flexible and creative Right results, right way SUMMARY 30