PEAQ PREDICTION OF ALFALFA QUALITY

Similar documents
Making The Best Use of Alfalfa in Dairy Rations

ALFALFA FOR DAIRY CATTLE

Cutting Management of Perennial Hay Crops

Cutting Management of Perennial Forages

Update on Predicting Harvest Time for Alfalfa. R. Mark Sulc 1 Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University

THE FUTURE OF FORAGE QUALITY TESTING FOR MARKETS. Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Predicting Alfalfa Quality

ABSTRACT SEEDING RATE EXPERIMENT

Small Grains, Sorghum/Sudan, Alfalfa

Survey of Silage Crop Nutritive Value in New Mexico and West Texas

Hay Quality. Bringing information and education into the communities of the Granite State

FEEDING HORSES WHEN FEED IS SHORT R.J. (Bob) Coleman Ph.D. PAS

ALFALFA FERTILITY AND COMPOST MANAGEMENT. Glenn E. Shewmaker 1 and Jason Ellsworth RATIONALE

Change FORAGES MORE PEOPLE FORAGES: CHANGE-CHALLENGES- OPPORTUNITIES. Garry D. Lacefield Extension Forage Specialist University of Kentucky

Forage Quality Considerations of Alfalfa

2015 Cool Season Annual Forage Mixtures Trial

STRIP CUTTING ALFALFA FOR LYGUS MANAGEMENT: FORAGE QUALITY IMPLICATIONS. Shannon C. Mueller, Charles G. Summers, and Peter B. Goodell 1 ABSTRACT

2016 Vermont Organic Silage Corn Performance Trial

1 st ALFALFA SYMPOSIUM

More Feed = More Milk. Dry Matter Intake Used To Express Feed. Intake ASC-135. Donna M. Amaral-Phillips, Roger W. Hemken, and William L.

2015 Manure Incorporation and Reduced Tillage Corn Trial

A GRAZING AND HAYING SYSTEM WITH WINTER ANNUAL GRASSES. Steve Orloff and Dan Drake 1 ABSTRACT

2013 Small Grain Forage Trial: Nitrogen Fertility x Harvest Date

Efficacy of Grazing Stockpiled Perennial Forages for Winter Maintenance of Beef Cows

I ntroduction. Oat Hay Variety Trial R.L. Dovel, J. Rainey, and G. Chilcote'

No-till Dryland Cover Crops as a Forage Option for Beef Cattle

Using Winter Rye as Forage in Corn Silage Systems

William C. Templeton, Jr. President, Grassland Advisory Services, Inc. 800 Brook Hill Drive, Lexington, KY 40502

Strategic Grazing of Alfalfa by Sheep in California s Central Valley

Oat Hay Variety Trial R.L. Dovel, J. Rainey, and G. Chilcote 1

2014 Southeast Hay Convention

PRODUCING THE BEST ALFALFA OR GRASS HAY FOR HORSES. Bill Schurg 1

Low Lignin Trait in Alfalfa What are the Possibilities?

Contacts: * Steve Barnhart, Iowa State University Extension forage specialist,

2/21/2014. Forages are Feeds. It depends

Cereal Silage Options for Western Canada

Forage and Grain Yield Potential of Non-Irrigated Spring Grains in the Klamath Basin, 2010

Comparative Nutritional Quality of Winter Crops for Silage

What Hay Is Right For Your Livestock. Tom Gallagher Capital Area Agriculture Horticulture Program Livestock Specialist

Drought-Stressed Corn Silage for Beef Cows

Winter Cow Feeding Strategies. Why is this Important?

Extending the Summer Grazing Season. John Jennings Professor - Forage Specialist

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Alfalfa Cutting Frequency and Fall Harvest Management. Steve Orloff and Dan Putnam University of California Cooperative Extension, Yreka and UCD

NAYLORSEED. The New Science of Alfalfa. Phirst Extra Hybrid Brought to alfalfa growers using Hybrid Alfalfa Technology.

Using a Grazing Stick for Pasture Management

Irrigated Corn Production in Saskatchewan

Sarah Kenyon Agronomy Specialist

Experiences with Kura Clover in Agricultural Systems in Wisconsin

2015 Pasture Productivity Trial

2016 Perennial Forage Trial

The Effective Fibre Source for Livestock

FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers

BALANCING YIELD, QUALITY AND PERSISTENCE. Steve Orloff and Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT

Nutritive Value of the Crop Residues from bt-corn Hybrids and Their Effects on Performance of Grazing Beef Cows

Pasture Management for Pasture-finished Beef

MARKETING QUALITY HAY

Protocol for Study: Effect of feeding Moringa oleifera leaves and green stems to dairy cows on milk production and composition

DLF Forages SEED YOUR EXPECTATIONS. Product Guide. Grasshancer TM

Alfalfa Planting and Production Management

Managing Small Grains for Livestock Forage

LIGHT VS HEAVY WEIGHT STEERS GRAZING OLD WORLD BLUESTEM AT THREE STOCKING RATES. II. NUTRITIVE VALUE, FORAGE INTAKE, AND GRAZING TIME.

Why Rotational Stocking Makes Dollars and Sense Victor Shelton & Jerry Perkins Grazing Specialists Natural Resources Conservation Service

BUYING AND SELLING ALMLM HAY

Key words: Grass-legume mixture ratios, forage yield and nutritive value, soil water depletion, water use efficiency

Beef Cattle Handbook

Impacts of Bale Grazing on Herbage Production, Forage Quality and Soil Health in South-central North Dakota

ALFALFA FOR BEEF CATTLE

Large-Scale Evaluations of In-Season Liquid NPK Applications to Push Alfalfa Production

EMERGING ISSUES WITH ALFALFA AND FORAGES IN IDAHO

CONTRACT FEED PRODUCTION ARRANGEMENTS

Forages and Hay Quality in SW Missouri

Dry Matter Intake and Manure Production for Management Intensively Grazed Dairy Cattle

County Farm Centre May 2014 Your May issue:

Klamath Experiment Station

OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE LIMITED IRRIGATION SORGHUM SILAGE PERFORMANCE TRIAL, 2007

GROWTH OF GRASSES & LEGUMES: IMPACT ON GRAZING

CUTTING SCHEDULE STRATEGIES TO MAXIMIZE RETURNS. Steve Orloff and Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT

Calibre BMR Forage Sorghum

What s New in Alfalfa February 2007

So You Want to Grow Corn. Battle River Research Group March

Effect of Location, Season, and Variety on Yield and Quality of Forage Oat

Hay Yield and Quality of Sudangrass and Sorghum-Sudangrass Hybrid Varieties Grown for Export from Western Arizona

GROUND KAFIR AS A FEED FOR DAIRY COWS¹

2/24/2015. Totally independent laboratory providing extensive testing of Feed, Forage, Soil, Manure and Water.

Stockpiling Forages. Stockpiling Perennial Grasses. Stockpiling. Risky business? 8/22/2010. Rocky Lemus August 25, 2010 MSPFSC

Forage, feed and supplements, Forages Hay and Processed Forage

Northern NY Agricultural Development Program 2010 Project Report. Can Manure Replace the Need for Starter Nitrogen Fertilizer?

UPL Group of Companies

ABSTRACT. Keywords: Alfalfa, Medicago sativa, hay production, hay acreage, forage ACREAGE AND PRODUCTION OF HAY

2014 Minimum Tillage Corn Trial

2017 Non-GMO Corn Silage Variety Trial

Reed Canarygrass Craig C. Sheaffer, Gordon C. Marten, David L. Rabas, Neal P. Martin and Doug W. Miller

explore News Crops Livestock Farm Life Machinery and Shop Markets Weather Video Digital Editions Classifieds Subscriptions About us More

Economics of Grain Supplementation for Organic Dairy Cows

Forage Management. Tall Fescue Management. Edward B. Rayburn, Extension Forage Agronomist October 1993

OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE LIMITED IRRIGATION SORGHUM SILAGE PERFORMANCE TRIAL, 2006

Corn Silage with Winter Rye Cover and Forage Crops

Using Grass Forages in Dairy Cattle Rations

Dry Matter Intake and Manure Production for Management Intensively Grazed Dairy Cattle

Transcription:

PEAQ PREDICTION OF ALFALFA QUALITY David B. Fischer TAKE HOME MESSAGES Select 1 st cut harvest date by quality vs. calendar Accurate methods are available to determine quality of standing alfalfa RFV calculated from scissor clip NIR and PEAQ are very comparable Prioritize 1 st cut alfalfa harvest over other field work Alfalfa is an important component of dairy rations and can be a profitable cash crop. High quality alfalfa can reduce feed costs and increase profitability. The key management strategy in producing high quality alfalfa forage is knowing when to select the optimum harvest date for the first cutting. Second and successive cuttings should then be harvested every 28 to 30 days thereafter. A common approach to determining the optimum harvest date for quality and quantity is by observing the growth stage of the plants. There is a direct correlation between the morphological development of the plant and the quality and quantity of alfalfa harvested. It is well documented that alfalfa nutrient quality decreases as the plant matures from the vegetative stage to full flower. At the same time, the pounds of plant material harvested per acre increases as the plant matures. The optimum harvest date is a compromise between the feed quality and the tonnage produced. Producers need to monitor the first cut alfalfa growth in order to determine the optimum harvest date. To assist alfalfa producers in monitoring plant growth and quality, University of Illinois Extension specialists conducted an Illinois scissor clip project on eighteen fields in eight regions throughout the state during spring 1998. This project is supported by a Partnership Illinois grant. SCISSOR CLIP VS. PEAQ Alfalfa fields were monitored based on the alfalfa scissor clipping procedure developed by the University of Wisconsin and the Wisconsin Forage Council. Samples were collected twice weekly from 2 or 3 fields per region. Sampling began at the late vegetative stage and continued to harvest. Alfalfa clippings were taken from the same area of the field, approximately the same time of the day and clipped at 2 inches above soil line. All clip samples were sent to Agri-King, Inc. Laboratory in Fulton, Illinois and analyzed by the near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIR) method. The analysis included the relative feed value (RFV) which is computed from the acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) results using the following formula: RFV = [88.9 - (0.779 x % ADF)] x (120 % NDF) 1.29

A second method for monitoring the alfalfa quality was used in the study with the predictive equations for alfalfa quality (PEAQ). PEAQ is an in-field prediction of fiber composition based on plant height and maturity. Plant height measurements, soil to stem tip, were taken and averaged from the tallest plants in a 2 sq. ft. area. The maturity ratings were taken from a modified version of the Kalu-Fick morphological stages of legume development scale (Table 1). PEAQ values for ADF and NDF were computed using the following formula: ADF = 10.78 + (0.53 x height) + (0.79 x maturity value) NDF = 15.86 + (0.69 x height) + (0.81 x maturity value) The RFV based on the PEAQ fiber values were calculated as a comparison to the lab tested relative feed values. The relative feed value (RFV) is a measure of the fiber fractions which dictate the digestibility and feed intake potential. The higher RFV, the higher quality feed value is obtained from the alfalfa. Relative feed value is a way to compare two or more similar forages for energy intake. Dairy producers with high producing cows often look for alfalfa with a RFV of 140 to 160 and higher. The crude protein content is not taken into account in the RFV calculation and needs to be evaluated separately. A common goal for dairy producers is to raise or buy alfalfa that has 20% or higher CP, 30% or lower ADF, and 40% or lower NDF which will equate to a RFV of near 150. In order to achieve a 150 RFV to the cow, it is recommended to harvest the first cutting when the RFV reaches 170 in the field. The optimum harvest date for first cutting alfalfa in 1998, based on a RFV of 170, for Southern Illinois (Clinton County) was approximately May 4 and for Northern Illinois (Stephenson County) approximately May 18. Using the RFV as a first cutting harvest guide is preferable to the cutting by the calendar method often used by producers. From previous years data the optimum harvest date can vary about three weeks from year to year, depending on the growing season as shown in Table 2. Based on the averaged data from two fields in Clinton County, the RFV declined 3 to 4 points per day during the sampling period (Table 3). This decline is consistent with the sampling from the other Illinois regions. However, growing conditions can effect the decline of quality and the RFV loss per day can range from 3 to 7 points as reported in various studies. The data in Table 3 represents the changes in alfalfa forage quality comparing PEAQ to NIR values. This data shows a close correlation between PEAQ and NIR values. Alfalfa quality evaluations were also conducted on the harvested hay or silage to determine the amount of nutrient loss from field clip to harvest. The average decline in RFV for the two fields harvested in Clinton County was 18.4 points as shown in Table 4. This data supports the concept to harvest alfalfa when the scissor clip data is near the RFV of 170 in order to achieve a harvested crop value of 150 RFV.

CONCLUSIONS The Illinois alfalfa scissor clip project provided information and awareness to producers to enhance their ability to produce higher quality forages through timely harvest. Improved forage quality will allow dairy producers to reduce feed costs and improve profitability. These producers will have less dependence on importation of alfalfa from other states to meet animal production requirements. Monitoring the RFV for alfalfa quality in the field via scissor clip or PEAQ can be an excellent management tool as demonstrated by this Partnership Illinois project. Efforts to build on the confidence of using the PEAQ method and the ease of checking RFV in the field will be continued through further studies. Table 5 is shown as a quick reference chart to determine RFV with the PEAQ method. First cutting alfalfa needs to be harvested near 170 RFV in order to get adequate quality and to set-up the cutting schedule for the rest of the growing season. Subsequent cuttings should be taken every 28 to 30 days. The first cutting must be taken in the bud stage since quality reduces rapidly as the plant matures. It may be difficult to make top quality first cutting alfalfa due to weather factors, coarse plant material, and possible weed and insect infestations. However, by prioritizing hay harvesting over all other cropping chores, many dairy and hay producers are able to make satisfactory first crop alfalfa. TABLE 1. Alfalfa Growth Stages for Determining Maturity Value Maturity Value Name Description 0 early vegetative stem length < 6 inches 1 mid vegetative stem length 6 to 12 inches 2 late vegetative stem length > 12 inches 3 early bud one or two nodes with visible buds 4 late bud three or more nodes with visible buds 5 early flower one node with at least one open flower 6 late flower two or more nodes with an open flower TABLE 2. Optimum Harvest Date for 1st cutting Alfalfa in Southern Illinois - 1994 to 1998 Year Date RFV 1994 May 6 168 1995 April 21 172 1996 May 2 172 1997 May 13 171 1998 May 4 174

TABLE 3. 1998 Alfalfa Quality Results - Clinton County, Illinois NIR PEAQ Date % CP % ADF % NDF RFV RFV 4-16 31.9 23.5 32.8 232.3 246.4 4-20 30.4 20.6 29.6 229.6 233.1 4-23 30.7 23.2 32.3 204.6 214.3 4-27 29.3 24.0 33.8 193.7 193.5 4-30 28.7 25.0 34.7 186.6 181.4 5-4 26.5 27.0 36.2 174.5 169.2 5-7 26.1 29.4 39.4 156.2 158.2 5-11 25.8 29.3 39.1 157.0 143.3 TABLE 4. Average Nutrient Comparison (Dry Matter Basis) of Scissor Clip and Harvested Samples Tested by NIR - Clinton County, Illinois Date Description CP % ADF % NDF % RFV 5-11-98 standing in field 25.8 29.3 39.1 157.0 5-12-98 harvested 22.0 32.9 42.5 138.6 Partially supported by a Partnership Illinois Grants Program

TABLE 5. Monitoring Illinois Alfalfa Quality Using Predictive Equations for Alfalfa Quality (PEAQ) Height of tallest stem (soil surface to stem tip) Late vegetative > 12" tall, no bud visible Early bud 1-2 nodes, visible buds Late bud > 2 nodes, visible buds Early flower 1 node, visible flowers Late flower 2 nodes, open flowers Inches Relative Feed Values 16 237 229 220 213 206 17 230 222 214 207 200 18 224 216 208 201 195 19 217 210 203 196 190 20 211 204 197 191 185 21 205 199 192 186 180 22 200 193 187 181 175 23 195 188 182 177 171 24 190 184 178 172 167 25 185 179 173 168 163 26 180 174 169 164 159 27 175 170 165 160 155 28 171 166 161 156 152 29 167 162 157 153 148 30 163 158 153 149 145 31 159 154 150 146 141 32 155 151 146 142 138 33 152 147 143 139 135 34 148 144 140 136 132 35 145 141 137 133 129 36 142 138 134 130 126 37 138 135 131 127 124 38 135 132 128 124 121 39 132 129 125 122 119 40 129 126 123 119 116 41 127 123 120 117 114 42 124 121 117 114 111 43 121 118 115 112 109 44 119 116 113 110 107 45 116 113 110 107 105