From Policy to Reality

Similar documents
Pima County Travel Reduction Ordinance

Transportation Concurrency

Effective Transportation Demand Management (TDM) in Congested Corridors US 422 TDM Best Practices Policy Brief and Recommendations

LAND USE POLICIES BY COMMUNITY DESIGNATION

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDIES

PINELLAS COUNTY MOBILITY PLAN SUMMARY REPORT

Transportation Planning Methods for Improving Mobility in Developing Activity Centers in Orange County, California

APPENDIX 17 MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLANS

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Working with Transportation Concurrency Exception Areas

Transit Service Guidelines

SOUTHEAST FLORIDA REGIONAL COMPACT CLIMATE CHANGE. Sustainable Communities & Transportation Planning

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

TravelSmart: Planning for Sustainable Urban Transportation

THE REGION S PLAN POLICY FRAMEWORK. August 2015

VEHICLES MILES TRAVELED (VMT) TRAFFIC IMPACT METRIC

Congestion Management Process 2013 Update

MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

URBAN CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES URBAN CENTER

3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES

Rapid Transit in Winnipeg. Winnipeg TOD Summit November 17, 2014

Transportation and Works Department The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 6Z1

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

RURAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ALL COMMUNITIES

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES

Policy on Travel Management in Beijing City

APPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

CHAPTER 1 COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION BASIC INFORMATION

PRICING STRATEGIES PRESENTED BY JEFFREY D. ENSOR MALAYSIA TRANSPORT RESEARCH GROUP TO THE NOVEMBER 25, 2003

City of Edmonton Zoning Bylaw Parking Study Final Report

AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE

APPENDIX B. Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies

MEMO DATE: February 12, SOL on Transportation Impact Study Guidelines. District Executives

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES

Appendix H. Millennium Hollywood Project Trip Cap and Mitigation Triggers

Richard J. Porter Assistant Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah 110 Central Campus Dr., Rm.

- FACT SHEET - THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES

TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION 9-1

1 RICHMOND HILL CENTRE / LANGSTAFF URBAN GROWTH CENTRE - TRANSPORTATION STUDY

City of Brantford Chapter 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.1 Purpose of the Project

Ottawa Transportation Master Plan 2013

ARTICLE VII - OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING Section 7-10

Purpose of the Countywide Transportation Plan SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Downtown Las Vegas Multi-modal Transportation Project Las Vegas, Nevada. Appendix A: Benefit-Cost Analysis

DART s Role in Transit - Oriented Development. Jack Wierzenski,, Director Economic Development & Planning Dallas Area Rapid Transit

ATTACHMENT A. Detailed Study Scope. I-66 (Inside) Multi-modal Study Scope

State of the Practice - How Public Transportation is addressed in Traffic Impact Studies ITE Transit and Traffic Impact Studies Committee

11 February 13, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT& PROPERTY OWNER: EVERGREEN VIRGINIA, LLC

Appendix A: Benefit Cost Analysis

IPSWICH NORTHERN ROUTES STUDY. Stage 1 Progress

VDOT Land Use Overview. Brad Shelton, AICP Transportation and Mobility Planning Division June 2015

Memorandum. FROM: Jim Ortbal Rosalynn Hughey Barry Ng TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL. DATE: June 16, 2017

Downtown Parking Management Strategy. Goals. Key Concepts and Implementation Policies (IP) 1. Dept. responsible for implementing policy.

TRANSPORTATION MOBILITY PLAN GUIDELINES

1.1.1.b. Agencies share best practices as they integrate COMPASS facilitates

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

COMMUTER BENEFITS PROGRAM. City Manager s Office 450 Civic Center Plaza Richmond, CA 94804

Re: Mobility Plan 2035 FEIR Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis

ABC Ramps Transportation Options Program Plan Scope of Work Kick off meeting 10/5/2016

HCM 6th Edition Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide (PPEAG) to the HCM Bringing Back-of-the-Envelope Back.

Sustainable Development and Public Transport

Current Trends in Traffic Congestion Mitigation

Transit Oriented Development Strategic Plan for Bhopal

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

Category 3, BART Capacity, Access and Parking Improvements. Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT Page 2 of 5 The Authority directed staf

Draft Regional Transportation Plan Comments

September Public Meetings. Developing a Blueprint for the Corridor

A NEW VISION FOR URBAN TRANSPORTATION CURRENT TRENDS ARE LEADING TO URBAN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS WHICH DO NOT MEET NEEDS AND ARE NOT SUSTAINABLE

Los Angeles County Congestion Reduction Demonstration Project

TRANSIT SERVICE GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION/ GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Congestion Management Process Update

Application of system dynamics with GIS for assessing traffic emission management policy

S-09: Auburn Station Access Improvements

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 195 ( 2015 ) World Conference on Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Des Moines Area MPO. MPO Planning Subcommittee Meeting March 3, Des M oines Area M etropolitan Planning Organization

Wynn Everett Transportation Plan. June 20, 2014

I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Capital Beltway in Northern Virginia, USA

DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARTERIAL CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT TRANSPORTATION STRATEGY FOR THE CAPITAL DISTRICT REGION

Traffic Study Guidelines

Connecting Cleveland 2020 Citywide Plan TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT

METRO VANCOUVER MOBILITY PRICING INDEPENDENT COMMISSION FINAL TERMS OF REFERENCE. Revised - June 30, 2017

The Three C s of Urban Transportation Planning

Appendix A: Initial Cost Analysis Calculations

6.0 Indirect Effects and Cumulative Impacts

Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies

Transform 66 Multimodal Project: Prioritization Process and Evaluation Criteria Approved March 3, 2016

Transit Demand Analysis

King County Land Use Strategies for Global Warming Preparedness

Memorandum. Date: RE: Citizens Advisory Committee

1.0 INTRODUCTION. Athens Transit System Transit Development Plan 1.0 Introduction. 1.1 System Overview

Zoning Permits 11-1 ZONING PERMITS

Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. Case No.: E Reception: 41.

Calgary Transportation Plan. Adopted by Council September calgary.ca call 3-1-1

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

Niagara s Transportation Strategy 1. Introduction:

Transcription:

From Policy to Reality Updated ^ Model Ordinances for Sustainable Development 2000 Environmental Quality Board 2008 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Funded by a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sustainable Communities Grant

Primary Author: Brian Ross Project Coordinator:

INTRODUCTION The Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, presented in a separate section, focuses on maintaining a reasonable levels of service (LOS) on roads and other infrastructure. A corollary ordinance is a Travel Demand Management (TDM) ordinance or Trip Reduction Ordinance (TRO). Larger cities in Minnesota have many investment and maintenance decisions to make in regard to transportation infrastructure. TDM or TROs mitigate the effects of new or expanding development along highway corridors, in downtown areas, or any large development by mandating or encouraging management of the demand side of traffic growth. Rather than responding to increasing demand by building more road and parking infrastructure, or by restricting development until infrastructure is adequate, the community (or developer) can invest in infrastructure and programs that get people out of their cars. Travel Demand Management Standard The following ordinance is directed toward larger cities and, unlike the APFO, applies exclusively to commercial and industrial development. This ordinance was adapted from the Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, 549.170, 549.180. The travel demand management plan is one method of beginning demand management. Whenever a new development or expansion of existing space is proposed, the community can require the developer to investigate and/or implement travel demand management efforts. A number of other regulatory methods of managing infrastructure investment in roads, parking, and other automobile-related infrastructure. Examples include ordinances that require businesses to invest in bicycle lockers and shower facilities to promote non-motorized travel modes, traffic calming measures to discourage use of local streets as arterials, minimizing the use of free parking to encourage alternative travel modes, and a variety of design initiatives around pedestrian sheds and transit facilities. Transit-oriented design (described in another section) is a more prescriptive method of getting to the same goal through land use and design standards. Travel demand management requirements, in contrast, are a performance standard that can apply to any type of development. TDM allows more flexibility in meeting the goal of diversifying travel modes (by avoiding the prescriptive design of TOD). The prescriptive nature of TOD is better, however, for ensuring that transit infrastructure and building infrastructure are linked for the long term. Rural communities are less generally concerned with traffic capacity issues than urban and suburban communities. Rural communities must note, however, that some regional transportation routes were designed to accommodate only regional traffic. Local development along regional routes, without commensurate investment in design and capacity improvement to accommodate a shift in use from regional to local traffic, can result in significant degradations in quality of service. Model Sustainable Development Ordinances 1

I. Travel Demand Management Plan A. All development that includes any of the following criteria shall conduct a travel demand management plan (TDM) that addresses the transportation impacts of the development on air quality, parking and roadway infrastructure: 1. Any development in the downtown zone or in the suburban office park zone needing 75 or more additional parking spaces under the Model Community site design standards; 2. Any development in any zone containing one hundred thousand (100,000) square feet or more of new or additional gross floor area, or one hundred (100) or more new or additional parking spaces; 3. Any new commercial or industrial concern that will employ 100 or more people at the new location. B. Application for Plan Approval - Any person having a legal or equitable interest in land which requires submission of a TDM may file an application for approval of such plan on a form approved by the zoning administrator. C. Administrative Review - The planning director, in consultation with the city engineer, shall conduct the administrative review of the TDM. The planning director shall recommend to the zoning administrator any mitigating measures deemed reasonably necessary, who shall include such recommendation as a condition of the issuance of any building permit, zoning certificate or other approval required by this zoning ordinance or other applicable law. All findings and decisions of the planning director shall be final, subject to appeal to the planning commission, as specified in Chapter XX, Administration and Enforcement. D. Content of Plans - Any TDM shall contain at least the following: 1. A description of the goals of the TDM and its relationship to applicable Model Community transportation policies and programs. 2. A description of the transportation impacts of the development, including but not limited to forecasts of overall and peak period employment, forecasts of trips generated and mode splits, parking demand and parking supply available, and transit demand and transit supply available. 3. A description of mitigating measures designed to minimize the transportation impacts of the development, including but not limited to on-site transit facilities, transit use incentives, preferential location of car pool and van pool parking, on-site bicycle facilities including secure storage areas and amenities, staggered starting times and telecommuting opportunities. 2 Model Sustainable Development Ordinances

E. Required Implementation of TDM Plan, and Performance Standards 1. Any new development or existing business expanding its operation, and requiring a conditional use permit, rezoning, or that is receiving tax or funding assistance from Model Community, shall implement a TDM plan. The plan shall meet the following performance standards: a. Fifteen percent of employees on any given day should travel to the location using a mode other than single occupancy vehicle. Alternative modes include transit, bicycle, walking, carpooling, and telecommuting. b. The average vehicle ridership (AVR) for employees shall be 10% lower than the AVR for the entire Downtown District in Model Community. c. The AVR shall decrease over the first five years of active use in the new or expanded development. Subsection E.1 and parts thereafter set thresholds for when a TDM plan is required. The community will need to set a threshold standard for when the TDM requirement is effective. When development demand in a particular district is high, the community set the threshold low in order to capture not only new businesses but all existing businesses that expand. When development demand is not so great, the community may want to consider the effect that the threshold will have on existing businesses. Parts E.1.b. and c. use a performance standards based on average vehicle ridership (AVR). A number of other performance standards can be used. A standard based on AVR or on reducing trip generation from a threshold requires that the community calculate an existing AVR or threshold for the community or for the target district. Model Sustainable Development Ordinances 3