Department of Economics Fall Economics 121 SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS FOR MIDTERM EXAM

Similar documents
Monopolistic Markets. Regulation

Monopolistic Markets. Causes of Monopolies

Econ 001: Midterm 2 (Dr. Stein) Answer Key Nov 13, 2007

Practice Midterm Exam Microeconomics: Professor Owen Zidar

Econ 001: Midterm 2 (Dr. Stein) Answer Key March 31, 2008

Eco 300 Intermediate Micro

FIRST MIDTERM VERSION #1

FIRST MIDTERM VERSION #2

ECON 2100 (Summer 2016 Sections 10 & 11) Exam #3C

Pricing with Market Power

Economics of Managerial Decision Making (MGEC 611) SAMPLE EXAM

EconS 301 Intermediate Microeconomics Review Session #9 Chapter 12: Capturing Surplus

Overview 11/6/2014. Herfindahl Hirshman index of market concentration ...

Chapter 28 The Labor Market: Demand, Supply, and Outsourcing

Commerce 295 Midterm Answers

Eco 300 Intermediate Micro

Econ Microeconomic Analysis and Policy

SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG ECON6021 MICROECONOMICS PROBLEM SET NO.3 COMPETITIVE MARKETS AND MONOPOLY

Chapter 14 TRADITIONAL MODELS OF IMPERFECT COMPETITION. Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.

CHAPTER 8 Competitive Firms and Markets

Final Exam: ECON-100A Intermediate Microeconomics Bob Baden Section I: Answer at least two questions (answer all parts of the questions you choose)

Practice Exam 3: S201 Walker Fall with answers to MC

14.54 International Trade Lecture 17: Increasing Returns to Scale

14.1 Comparison of Market Structures

ECON 102 Kagundu Final Exam (New Material) Practice Exam Solutions

Basic Monopoly Pricing and Product Strategies

Economic Analysis for Business Decisions Multiple Choice Questions Unit-2: Demand Analysis

Chapter 8 The Labor Market: Employment, Unemployment, and Wages

Practice Final Exam. Write an expression for each of the following cost concepts. [each 5 points]

Chapter 8 Profit Maximization and Competitive Supply. Read Pindyck and Rubinfeld (2013), Chapter 8

a. Sells a product differentiated from that of its competitors d. produces at the minimum of average total cost in the long run

ECN 3103 INDUSTRIAL ORGANISATION

ECON 115. Industrial Organization

Chapter 13. Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

Introduction to Agricultural Economics Agricultural Economics 105 Spring 2013 First Hour Exam Version 1

not to be republished NCERT Chapter 6 Non-competitive Markets 6.1 SIMPLE MONOPOLY IN THE COMMODITY MARKET

Economics of Industrial Organization. Problem Sets

Chapter 7 Consumer/Producers and Market Efficiency

Chapter 1 Introduction to Pricing Techniques

The Competitive Model in a More Realistic Setting

Chapter 10 Lecture Notes

Econ 001: Midterm 2 (Dr. Stein) Answer Key March 23, 2011

Perfect price discrimination (PPD) 1 Graph. Monopolist sells product with downward-sloping demand curve Each consumer demands one unit: demand curve

Manufacture of Iron & Steel. Prepared By: John Cawley

Chapter 8. Firms in the Global Economy

ECON 202 2/13/2009. Pure Monopoly Characteristics. Chapter 22 Pure Monopoly

Exam 3 Practice Questions

Market structure 1: Perfect Competition The perfectly competitive firm is a price taker: it cannot influence the price that is paid for its product.

Midterm Exam Solution Sketch

Slides and Images, Worth Publishers Inc. 8-1

ECON 2100 (Summer 2014 Sections 08 & 09) Exam #3D

Pledge (sign) I did not copy another student s answers

Ecn Intermediate Microeconomic Theory University of California - Davis December 10, 2009 Instructor: John Parman. Final Exam

Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Chapter 7: Monopoly

ECON 2100 (Summer 2015 Sections 07 & 08) Exam #3A

ECO201: PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS SECOND MIDTERM EXAMINATION

Professor Christina Romer SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO PROBLEM SET 2

6. In the early part of 1998, crude oil prices fell to a nine-year low at $13.28 a barrel.

Lecture 2: Market Structure I (Perfect Competition and Monopoly)

Economics : Principles of Microeconomics Spring 2014 Instructor: Robert Munk April 24, Final Exam

Do not open this exam until told to do so. Solution

ECO201: PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS SECOND MIDTERM EXAMINATION

Exam 1. Pizzas. (per day) Figure 1

ECON 251 Exam 2 Pink. Fall 2012

Microeconomics (Oligopoly & Game, Ch 12)

6E:001 Principles of Microeconomics Summer 2001 Syllabus

CH 17 sample MC Name: Class: Date: Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Monopolistic Competition

Vertical integration and vertical restraints

Case: An Increase in the Demand for the Product

MONOPOLY. Characteristics

ECO201: PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS FIRST MIDTERM EXAMINATION

ECO201: PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS FIRST MIDTERM EXAMINATION

Other examples of monopoly include Australia Post.

Eco201 Review questions for chapters Prof. Bill Even ====QUESTIONS FOR CHAPTER 13=============================

ECO 162: MICROECONOMICS INTRODUCTION TO ECONOMICS Quiz 1. ECO 162: MICROECONOMICS DEMAND Quiz 2

Econ 300: Intermediate Microeconomics, Spring 2014 Final Exam Study Guide 1

EconS Perfect Competition and Monopoly

PICK ONLY ONE BEST ANSWER FOR EACH BINARY CHOICE OR MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION.

UNIT 4 PRACTICE EXAM

Lecture 6 Pricing with Market Power

Economics 101 Midterm Exam #2. April 9, Instructions

Problem Set 4 Eco 112, Fall 2011 Chapters covered: Ch. 8 and Ch. 9 (up to slide 15 Price Discrimination) Due date: October 20, 2011

Gregory Clark Econ 1A, Winter 2012 SAMPLE FINAL

Market Structures. Perfect competition Monopolistic Competition Oligopoly Monopoly

ECON 201: Introduction to Macroeconomics Professor Robert Gordon Midterm Exam 1: October 17, 2016

7. True/False: Perfectly competitive firms can earn economic profits in the long run. a. True b. False

Version 1 DO NOT BEGIN WORKING UNTIL THE INSTRUCTOR TELLS YOU TO DO SO. READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS FIRST.

FINALTERM EXAMINATION FALL 2006

ECON 2100 Principles of Microeconomics (Summer 2016) Monopoly

Managerial Economics Chapter 9 Practice Question

ECON December 4, 2008 Exam 3

Practice Exam 3: S201 Walker Fall 2004

8 CHAPTER OUTLINE Costs in the Short Run Fixed Costs

University of Toronto February 6, ECO 100Y INTRODUCTION TO ECONOMICS Midterm Test # 3

ECO201: PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS FIRST MIDTERM EXAMINATION

Final Exam Study Questions:

Unit 5: The Resource Market. (The Factor Market or Input Market)

ECON 311 MICROECONOMICS THEORY I

ECO201: PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS FIRST MIDTERM EXAMINATION

Transcription:

Department of Economics Fall 2001 University of California Woroch/Lopez/Pinsonneault Economics 121 SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS FOR MIDTERM EXAM I. TRUE or FALSE or UNCERTAIN and EXPLAIN: For each of the following 4 statements, decide whether each is true or false or uncertain, and then explain the reasoning behind your answer in a few sentences; if appropriate, provide a diagram. Each question is worth 7 points for a total of 28 points. 1. The two-product cost function C(q 1, q 2 ) = 100 + q 1 + q 2 + q 1 q 2 exhibits falling ray average cost when two units of q 2 are produced for each unit of q 1. FALSE If we let a bundle (q) be one unit of q 1 and two units of q 2, then: RAC(q) = C(q, 2q) / q = (100 + q + 2q +q*2q) / q = 100/q + 3 + 2q To see if RAC(q) is falling, we can check the derivative: drac(q)/dq = -100 / q 2 + 2 RAC(q) is falling when the derivative is less than zero, i.e. when 100 / q 2 + 2 < 0 100 / q 2 > 2 q 2 < 50 So, RAC falls until the square-root of 50, but then it rises. 2. In an industry composed of two equal-sized firms, if a new firm enters at the same time that the two incumbent firms merge, the change in the HHI will indicate that the industry is more concentrated. TRUE Before the merger, there are 2 firms of equal size, so HHI is equal to ½, which is the minimum HHI possible with 2 firms. After the merger and entry, there are again two firms. So, the only way that the HHI will not indicate that the industry is more concentrated is if the two firms after merger/entry are of equal size (which seems unlikely). 3. An airline may find it profitable to offer an express service that allows a passenger paying an additional $100 per ticket to go through separate security check-in lines even though those lines are no different than existing ones. TRUE Because express service saves time, all would prefer it, though some would value it less than $100. This partitions consumers into two groups based on willingness to pay for this benefit. If zero marginal cost of service, then profit increases. This is just like the Paris Metro example. 4. In the Hotelling model with one store located in the middle of Main Street, a monopolist s price does not change as consumers transportation cost increases. UNCERTAIN This depends on the initial level of the transportation cost. If the initial transportation cost was high enough such that initially the monopolist served less then the entire market, then an increase in the transportation cost will have no effect on price because price is (v+c)/2 and doesn t depend on t. If the Econ 121 Fall 2001 Page 1 Midterm Exam Answers

initial transportation cost was low enough such that the monopolist initially serves the entire market, then the monopolist is charging a price of P = v t/2. An increase in the transportation cost will cause the monopolist to either keep full coverage by dropping price or to drop the price to (v+c)/2. Either way, the monopolists price will change when the monopolist is initially serving the entire market. II. MULTI-PART QUESTIONS: Answer all parts of the following two questions. The point assignment for each subpart is given in [square brackets]. In total there are 46 points. 1. MonoAir is the only U.S. airline providing service from city A to city B and the reverse direction. It does not serve any other route. MonoAir s marginal cost of a passenger between the two cities is 10. Assume that demand for air travel between A and B by domestic travelers is given by the (inverse) demand curve: P d (q d ) = 70 q d. There are also foreign travelers who originate in cities outside the U.S. who wish to travel between these two cities. Their (inverse) derived demand for A- B service is given by: P f (q f ) = 110 q f. a) [3] Suppose that MonoAir cannot distinguish domestic and foreign travelers so that it must charge them the same fare on its route. Find and expression for aggregate demand that MonoAir faces for A-B service and graph it. Aggregate demand is given by: D d+f (p) = { 110 p if P > 70 { 180 2p if P < 70 Here is the graph of aggregate demand: 110 D d+f (p) 70 P 40 q 180 Econ 121 Fall 2001 Page 2 Midterm Exam Answers

b) [8] Find the profit-maximizing fare charged by MonoAir for A-B service. To find the profit-maximizing price for MonoAir, we need to find marginal revenue. Inverse demand is given by P d+f (q) = {110 q if q < 40 { 90 ½q if q > 40 Thus, MR(q) = { 110 2q if q < 40 { 90 q if q > 40 Setting MR = MC, the portion of MR for q < 40 gives us 110 2q = 10 q = 50. However, this violates the restriction that q < 40, so there is no intersection of MR and MC on this portion of the demand curve. When q > 40, setting MR = MC gives us 90 q = 10 q = 80. Equilibrium price is P * = 90 ½q * = 90 40 = 50. Now assume that MonoAir forms a joint venture with ForAir, a foreign airline that uses city A as its gateway, i.e., it runs an international flight into and out of city A. As part of their agreement, ForAir provides MonoAir with a list of its passengers arriving into and departing from A. c) [7] Find the fare MonoAir will charge the two types of passengers now that it can distinguish between domestic and foreign travelers. MR d = 70 2q d = 10 = MC q d = 30 P d = 40 MR f = 110 2q f = 10 = MC q f = 50 P f = 60 d) [4] Calculate the Lerner Index, and then use it to find the price elasticity for each of the two groups. L d = (P d MC) / P d = (40 10) / 40 = 3/4 = 1 / η d h d = 4/3 L f = (P f MC) / P f = (60 10) / 60 = 5/6 = 1 / η f h f = 6/5 e) [6] Drawing on your knowledge of actual conditions for the supply of airline services, give two examples of cost efficiencies that MonoAir and ForAir could realize in providing air service to foreign travelers. The two airlines could share facilities, thereby eliminating duplication of terminal/gate space, repair and service facilities, and computer reservation systems. They also could gain efficiencies by transporting both types on the same planes (rather than 2 separate fleets) to increase load factors and use larger aircraft (giving lower seat-mile cost). 2. Suppose a dominant firm resides in an industry with (inverse) market demand of P(Q) = 100 Q. Each of 10 competitive fringe firms has marginal cost of: MC(q f ) = 80 + 10q f. a) [3] Show that the supply curve of the competitive fringe is given by: S f (P) = P 80. We find the supply of a fringe firm from MC: P = 80 + 10q f q f = s(p) = 8 p / 10 Thus, S f (p) = 10 * s(p) = 80 - p Econ 121 Fall 2001 Page 3 Midterm Exam Answers

b) [2] Draw a large diagram with industry demand and competitive fringe supply. 140 120 S f (p) 100 80 60 40 D(p) 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 c) [4] On a second diagram, draw in the residual demand of the dominant firm and clearly label it. 100 90 80 MC 2 D d (p ) 70 MC 1 60 50 MR d 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Econ 121 Fall 2001 Page 4 Midterm Exam Answers

d) [3] Add the dominant firm s marginal revenue into the second diagram and clearly label it. See Diagram Above e) [6] Draw two Marginal Cost Curves in your second diagram that reflect the following conditions: MC 1 : The dominant firm chooses the same price and quantity as a monopolist. MC 2 : The fringe produces a positive amount. See Diagram Above III. INDUSTRY STUDIES: Choose either the beer or the steel industry and then answer the two questions below for the chosen industry. Point assignment is given in [square brackets]. This section has a total of 26 points. NOTE: We give below answers that we consider are complete, but there are many more detailed points that could be included, and were included by students, that were given additional credit. 1. BEER INDUSTRY a) [16] Using the SSNIP test for market definition, describe briefly how you would go about defining the economic market that includes lager beer. Begin with a product and geographic market, e.g., lager beers in Berkeley. In the first part of the test, ask whether a hypothetical monopolist over products in this market would find a SSNIP profitable. To make this operational, consider a 10% increase in all prices in the candidate market and check whether there is a loss of more or less than 5% over the course of one year. If the answer is no, then add either products (e.g. ales, malt liquors, soft drinks) or areas (e.g. Bay Area, Northern California). If yes, then remove products/areas. The second part of the test is to choose the smallest possible market such that a SSNIP is just profitable. Extent of market in end will depend on beer drinkers ability/willingness to substitute goods outside the market. Consequently, cross-price elasticities are crucial. For example, a zero cross-price elasticity of beer and soft drinks excludes soft drinks from the market. Also, blind taste test consistently show that American beer drinkers cannot identify their favorite brand unless they can be reminded by the label, so brand may be a distinguishing feature. b) [10] Give two sources of scale economies in beer production. Some sources of scale economies in beer production are dimensional economies, fixed cost/lumpiness, and multi-plant production. Currently, an efficient brewer would build two facilities each with approximately 4 million barrels per year capacity. Dimensional economies arise from the fact that vats, warehouses, and even beer trucks have the property that the material cost of enclosing them goes up by square while volume (and hence quantity) goes up by the cube. Consequently unit cost measured in terms of dollars per barrel falls with scale of production. Econ 121 Fall 2001 Page 5 Midterm Exam Answers

Fixed cost or lumpiness refers to the fact that the cost of beer making facilities (e.g., vats) and canning/bottling tend to not vary much with output, giving a very low MC once these facilities are in place. Related is the economies that derive from specialization in the design and use of facilities (e.g., a line fills just certain kind of bottles, than on that fills bottles and cans of all shapes). Multi-plant production allows reallocation of production to low MC plants (assuming rising marginal cost and ignoring transportation expense). Over time major brewers have built several plants and have dispersed them throughout the country. Factors that make this possible while maintaining uniformity of the product include a common brewing formulas and standardized inputs and facilities. National advertising realizes significant savings (measured according to the ability to deliver advertising messages per population) over regional or local advertising. The latter would include local radio and bill board. 2. STEEL INDUSTRY a) [16] Describe two prominent trends that have contributed to structural change in the U.S. steel industry over the past 50 years. Be sure to include the sources of structure change. Trends that have contributed to structural change in the U.S. steel industry over the past 50 years include domestic entry, integrated mills exiting, and foreign imports on the supply side, and slowing growth in steel consumption on the demand side, caused in part with ready availability of substitute materials like plastic, fiberglass and aluminum. Domestic entry has been mainly mini-mills throughout the country, over-represented in low labor cost areas (e.g. the south) and in areas under-represented by integrated mills. Their entry is mainly due to new technologies (electric furnace, continuous casting). Integrated mill exit has been from retirement of plants and bankruptcies due to their lack of adoption of innovations (continuous casting) and excess wage rates (Unite Steel Workers union). Foreign imports have increased due to opening of trade with new producing countries (Brazil, Poland) as well as increased production by more traditional suppliers (Germany, Korea). Some of foreign supply is using mini-mills (e.g., Japan). Over the 30 year period 1965-95, integrated mill production shrunk in half (to 72 million tons per year from 144) while mini mills increased nearly ten fold (4.5 up to 40.5). b) [10] Compare integrated mills and mini-mills in terms of their technology, products and scale. The raw inputs for integrated mills are ore, coke, magnesium, and lots of energy. Mini Mills use scrap, directly reduced ore (and sometimes pig iron), and electricity. The technology of integrated mills is the Basic Oxygen Furnace (BOF) and rolling mills and some continuous casting. Pig iron is produced as an intermediate product of integrated mills. Mini mills use the electric furnace with continuous casting and thin slab casting. Mini mills have substantially greater productivity as measured in terms of man-hours per ton. Econ 121 Fall 2001 Page 6 Midterm Exam Answers

Integrated mills produce the full range of steel products including slabs, billets, blooms and coil. These mills also produce high quality steel products such as stainless sheet and coils sold to auto and appliance manufacturers. Traditionally, mini mills produced lower quality steel such as bars, rods, structural and construction materials. Mini mills are increasing their production of finished products. It is also cheaper to build a mini mill: $200 per ton of steel making capacity as opposed to $1,200-1,500 for an integrated works. Efficient scale of an integrated mill is 2 blast furnaces at about 3 4 million tons per year. The scale of an efficient mini mill runs 350-750K tons per year, more if it has a thin-slab caster. Econ 121 Fall 2001 Page 7 Midterm Exam Answers