Digestate - Maximizing its Value and Use

Similar documents
From City to Farm: Greenbin-derived Compost Agricultural Trials. Compost Council of Canada Workshop January 22, 2013

Assessment of Environmental Impacts from On-farm Manure Digesters

MWELO Providing Insight on Soil and Compost Requirements. Will Bakx

Soil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FIELD MONITORING 1. Bradford D. Brown ABSTRACT

Reduced Tillage Fertilizer Management. Bill Verbeten NWNY Dairy, Livestock, & Field Crops Team

Resources Conservation Practices Tillage, Manure Management and Water Quality

Soil health and fertility

Nitrogen Availability from Manipulated Manures

Iowa Senate Natural Resources Committee February 3, 2015

Nutrient Recycling with Manure and Cover Crops

Accounting for plant-available nitrogen from cover crops in vegetable production systems

Manure Management. PEI Department of Agriculture & Forestry

ORGANIC VEGETABLE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

FACT SHEET. Understanding Soil Microbes and Nutrient Recycling. Agriculture and Natural Resources SAG-16-10

Ammonia emissions from agriculture

Managing Soils for Improved Pasture

Objective 1: Manage the demonstration site using common agricultural practices and monitor runoff quantity and quality.

EXAMPLE QUESTIONS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION EXAM

Outline. Farmer Goals/Needs for their Soil 1/23/2017. Compost. Challenges Using Compost. Other Support

Does Organic Matter Really Matter? Jodi DeJong-Hughes Regional Extension Educator, Willmar x 2006

Long-term Impacts of Poultry Manure Application

Soil Organic Matter. Soil degradation has become a major concern in. What is organic matter? Organic matter in virgin and cultivated soils

Fertilizing Forages With Manure

Land application of manure for water quality protection : A play in three acts

Manure is recognized: Solarization and use of compost in vegetable crops. Manure production. Why manure is a problem today but was not 50 years ago

Manure Management Facts Managing Manure within Tillage Systems and Crop Rotations

Managing Soil Fertility. Teagasc Soil Fertility Management Spring 2015

The Role of Agriculture and Forestry In Emerging Carbon Markets

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

The NM Sustainable Agriculture Conference Deming, NM (December 3, 2013)

Analysis of chicken litter

Availability of Nutrients in Manure Jeff Schoenau Department of Soil Science University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, SK, Canada

Phosphorus Dynamics and Mitigation in Soils

Nitrogen mangement for organic potatoes. Dan M. Sullivan Soil Scientist Oregon State University Corvallis, OR

Fertilizer and Nutrient Management of Timothy Hay

Nutrient Management Planning

Chapter 2.3. Manure and Fertilizer as Sources of Nutrients and Potential Environmental Hazards. learning objectives

SOM management: have your cake and eat it too. Organic Fertility

Using Compost and Animal Manure as a Florida BMP on Vegetable Production. Monica Ozores-Hampton, Ph.D.

THE BENEFITS OF MANAGING MANURES WITH ALFALFA. Roland D. Meyer

Pete Fandel Illinois Central College llinois Council on Best Management Practices

Manure, Crops and Soil Health Jeff Schoenau PAg Department of Soil Science S.S. Malhi AAFC Melfort

Nutrient management on organic cattle farms

Ontario Corn Nitrogen Soil N Survey 2015

Soil Testing and Nutrient Management in and after Dry Years

AVAILABILITY CALCULATOR

Inherent Factors Affecting Soil Respiration

Using SMRC Compost on Your Farm

Phosphorus Update. Addy Elliott Colorado State University Department of Soil and Crop Sciences

COMPOSTING 101 to 450 Paul Walker Illinois State University - Normal

Irrigated Spring Wheat

Best Management Practices ADDING ORGANIC AMENDMENTS

NRCS s Soil Health Initiative and its Relationship to Water Quality

Lessons Learned from Iowa On-Farm Studies Testing Manure Nitrogen Availability

Land Application of Biosolids Rules, Regulations and Benefits EPA regulations, under Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 503 (40 CFR 503) -

Compost Utilization Quality Guidelines in Tomato Production. Monica Ozores-Hampton, Ph.D University of Florida/IFAS/SWFREC

Institute of Ag Professionals

Protecting Your Water and Air Resources

ENGINEERED FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE GROWTH. IgniteS HEALTHIER SOILS STRONGER PLANTS HIGHER YIELDS

Basics of Composting Penn State Mushroom Conference David M. Beyer Professor-Extension Specialist

December 2002 Issue # PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT ON HIGH PHOSPHORUS SOILS. Angela Ebeling, Keith Kelling, and Larry Bundy 1/ Introduction

Principles of nutrient management

Ch. 5 - Nutrient Cycles and Soils

The University of Wisconsin-Platteville

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD. Nutrient Management. (Acre) Code 590

ph Management and Lime Material Selection and Application

Part B: Phosphorus Loss Potential due to Management Practices and P Source Characteristics

Cropping System Nutrient Management

Anaerobic Digestion (AD)

To 4R or Not to 4R Is There an Option?

The Biology of Composting

Cover Crops and Nutrient Cycling TIM REINBOTT

Humus balances and CO 2 storage with compost and digestate in the frame of soil health and climate change

Streamside Management. How the area around your pond effects the water.

Fertility management in organic strawberries

Pivot Irrigation of Livestock Manure Rick Koelsch, Livestock Environmental Engineer Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska

Wasted. fertilizer. is wasted. money. Make the most of your fertilizer investment with AVAIL and NutriSphere-N

Chapter 7.2. AFFIRM and Alberta MMP Software. learning objectives

Using No-till and Cover Crops to Reduce Phosphorus Runoff

Agricultural Phosphorus Management

LIQUID SWINE MANURE NITROGEN UTILIZATION FOR CROP PRODUCTION 1

Managing Soil Fertility: Targets to maximise production. Dr David P. Wall Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Co Wexford

2014 Georgia Grazing School:

Soil Test Laboratory Analysis and Fertilizer Recommendations

Fertilizer Management in No- Tillage Cucurbits

Pastures. E R G O F I T O I N A C T I O N Give Nature What Nature Wants

Nutrient Management (NM)

Nutrient Management in Crop Production

Strip-tillage Successes, watch-outs based on soil type, soil drainage, and climate

The Soil Community: Managing it. Kristy Borrelli REACCH Extension Specialist

Soil Health & Conservation Strategies. Andrew Barrie OMAFRA Nov 15, 2016

Calculating the fertilizer value of manure from livestock operations J.A. Moore and M.J. Gamroth

Swine Manure Production and Nutrient Content

Considerations for Corn Residue Harvest in Minnesota

Cover Crops for Soil Health and Water Quality

Keeping the Grass Greener on Your Side of the Fence Understanding Pasture Fertility

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P and S

November 2008 Issue # Nutrient Management Considerations in a High-Cost Environment

Act 38 Nutrient Balance Sheet Standard Format Word Version User Guide & Sample Nutrient Balance Sheet October 2017

Transcription:

Digestate - Maximizing its Value and Use National Compost Conference September 16-18, 2015 Christine Brown - OMAFRA

On-Farm Anaerobic Digestion Research Project Anna Crolla Alfred College June 2015

On-Farm Anaerobic Digestion Research Project Anna s Project Objectives Evaluating digestate quality to maximize energy production Monitor on-farm digesters and evaluate digestate quality and digester performance Evaluate whether current digester design standards (i.e. minimum retention time, temperature, and volatile solids reduction) are appropriate for ensuring sufficient anaerobic digestion Determine whether operational and output-based methods can be alternatives to the current 20-day HRT requirement Compare Ontario digester operation standards with other jurisdictions

Anna s Preliminary Data Results FOS/TAC and acetic acid concentrations are good indicators of possible digester upset Reduction of solids ranges between 50 to 70% (wet basis) in digester system which is typical for digester systems 1 to 2 log reduction in bacteria indicators (E.coli and Salmonella) Salmonella typically present in lower concentrations Digester monitoring is on-going at all digester systems in study

Project Outcomes More Questions: Compare digestate quality to raw untreated manure Identify the most significant variables that influence anaerobic digester treatment performance Identify which parameters are most suitable indicators of minimum anaerobic digestion treatment (e.g. HRT, VS reduction, VFAs, etc.) Identify other parameters that may be suitable to measure anaerobic digestion treatment

Sources Digestate use for Agriculture Land Farm - manure-based with additions Municipal food waste plus additions Advantages of Agricultural Digestate Use: Composition will vary with inputs nutrient testing is important Good balance of available crop nutrients Opportunity for liquid -solid separation (additional opportunities) Lower odour and pathogens relative to manure Ideal for spring/ in-crop application Evaluating digestate quality to maximize crop production benefits/minimize environmental impact

Maximizing the Benefit of Digestate: Nutrient benefit What to test for Soil Health benefits Environmental considerations Runoff Leaching Preferential flow Ammonia loss Infield & Storage Application timing Outline: Continuous Corn with no fertilizer added Anaerobic Digestion is promoted for reducing Greenhouse gas emissions Good digestate management will further enhance the GHG mitigation benefits Corn in rotation with fertilizer added Early August Harrow Research Station

What an Agricultural Analysis Looks like Helps determine macro and micro nutrient content reduce commercial fertilizer needs - and helps determine best management

Maximizing the Benefit of Digestate - Nutrients Need to know the nutrient composition of the material using lab analysis Pre AD = liquid dairy Post AD = liquid hog Nutrients Liquid1 Available Liquid2 Available Solid ~Available kgs/m 3 kgs/m 3 kgs/tonne Dry Matter (%) 2.8 4.0 40 26.3 263 Total Nitrogen (%) 0.44 0.36 0.75 2.2 1.8 Ammonium-N (%) 3085 2062 2435 Total Phosphorus (%) 0.07 1.2 0.04 0.74 0.36 6.6 Total Potassium(%) 0.07 0.72 0.27 2.9 0.45 4.9 Magnesium (ppm) 100 0.1 500 0.5 2700 2.7 Sulphur (ppm) 335 0.34 284 0.3 1185 1.2 Calcium (ppm) 1250 1.25 1,400 1.4 8100 8.1 Zinc (ppm) 10 0.01 15 0.02 51.3 0.05 ph 8.0 7.8 8.2 C:N ratio 2:1 4:1 15:1 Organic matter (%) 2 20 2.7 27 20.8 208 Conductivity (EC) ms/cm 17.7 16.4 4.72 Sodium (ppm) 700 0.7 900 0.9 1400 1.4 2.6

Maximizing the Benefits of Digestate Soil Health Nutrients provide food for soil micro-organisms Microbial populations aid nutrient cycling Small source of carbon even after AD process Synergistic effect with cover crops for improving soil quality

Different Amendments provide Different Benefits to Soil sugars cellulose proteins hemicellulose polyphenols lignin Cover crops Digestate Manure Compost humus

Diversity benefits the soil Bacteria sugars cellulose proteins hemicellulose polyphenols lignin Actinomycetes Cover crops Digestate Manure Compost humus Fungi

SOM level Putting it all together When inputs or losses are changed, SOM quantity changes to a different level and a new steady state condition is reached. SOM in virgin soil Corn-oats-clover rotation plus manure application Management change imposed Steady state SOM after years of continuous corn cultivation New steady state SOM level 1875 1955 2005 Years of cultivation Richard Stehouwer Penn State University Dept. of Crop & Soil Sciences

Impact of Rain on Poor Structured Soils

Impact of Rain on Poor Structured Soils

Poor Aggregate Stability Good Aggregate Stability Aggregate Stability in in soil: The glue that holds the soil soil together Corn-Soybean Rotation Conventional Tillage Long term sod no tillage

Digestate Management Environmental considerations Runoff Leaching Preferential flow Ammonia loss storage & in-field Timing of application

Digestate Application Management Uniform application with narrow spacing application or shallow injection Increases infiltration into soil - reduces movement below root zone Lower organic matter = viscosity & moisture content Increases risk of runoff / preferential flow to tile Depending on AD feedstocks used, digestate often has a high ph with high ammonium-n (NH 4 -N) content requires injection / incorporation /in-crop application to reduce NH 4 -N loss (volatilization) Any late-summer / fall application should include cover crops to enhance nutrient uptake/ reduce leaching risk. Ammonium-N converts to nitrate-n which moves with water = below root zone during non growing season (leaching)

Phosphorus Losses from Application Ammonia volatilization & soil N > crop needs can contribute to N 2 O emissions Late summer applied digestate: soil microorganisms convert NH 4 -N to NO 3 -N NO 3 -N (nitrate) moves with water Light soils = leaching risk and heavy soils = denitrification risk fall/winter season = in high risk of NO 3 -N movement below the root zone Spring injected Liquid Digestate = 23 lbs/1000 gal available N (2.3 kg/m 3 ) Late Summer injected Liquid Digestate = 10 lbs/1000 gal available N (1.0 kg/m 3 )

Infiltration / percolation? Zone of soil-water interaction (1-5 cm) Particulate P from eroded soil particles Dissolved P from soil solution Tile Flow

Dosimeter Reading ppm/hr Fall Applied Liquid & Solid Digestate with Cover Crop 1000 Ammonium-N Loss from Liquid and Solid Digestate After Aug 19 application with Oat Cover Crop 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Days after application 15 Check check no application High rate liquid medium liquid low liquid High rate Solid low Solid

Dosmiter Readings (ppm/hr) 1200 Ammonia Loss Average of Surface Application and Injected Digestate August 19 Sept 8, 2015 1000 R² = 0.8001 800 600 400 check injected digestate surface digestate R² = 0.8138 200 0 R² = 0.8623 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Hours After Digestate Application -200

Dosimeter Readings (ppm/hr) Comparing Ammonia Loss Trends Injected and Surface Applied Manure to Digestate 1200 1000 R² = 0.8001 800 600 400 200 R² = 0.8138 R² = 0.8277 R² = 0.8265 check injected digestate surface digestate surface manure injected manure 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600-200 Hours After Application

N Losses from Application Ammonia volatilization & soil N > crop needs can contribute to N 2 O emissions Late summer applied digestate: soil microorganisms convert NH 4 -N to NO 3 -N NO 3 -N (nitrate) moves with water Light soils = leaching risk and heavy soils = denitrification risk fall/winter season = in high risk of NO 3 -N movement below the root zone Spring injected Liquid Digestate = 25 lbs/1000 gal available N (2.5 kg/m 3 ) Late Summer injected Liquid Digestate = 11 lbs/1000 gal available N (1.0 kg/m 3 ) (no cover crop)

Method of Application Deep or Shallow Injection Soil Inorganic Nitrogen (kg ha -1 ) Goal: Rapid infiltration of digestate into soil and uniform distribution through the soil profile Spring Soil Inorganic Nitrogen Content Spring (May 24th June 28th) 135 115 Summer Application Fall Application Spring Application N lost below root zone? 95 75 55 35 15 Check Deep injection Shallow injection Research from Dr. J Lauzon, U of Guelph Manure Application Method

Minimizing the Ammonia Loss from Storages Digestate - often high ph; high ammonia/ammonium Low solids content no crusting Varying temperatures in storage Above 20 C air temp increases risk of ammonia loss

Minimizing the Ammonia loss from Storages Potential solutions: Reducing Ammonia loss Cover storage to capture methane/ammonia Simulate crust (i.e. chopped straw, floating balls, etc.) Backfill around storage Shading

Challenge: Opportunities - Combining Digestate with Composting Liquid Digestate application is limited to growing season Late fall/winter/early spring production requires a lot of storage Digestate is relatively low in soil organic matter (SOM) To maintain current SOM levels (~2.5%) it would require about 25,000 gallons/ac (250 m 3 /ha) every year (= nutrient overloading) Opportunity? Separate the digestate solids Mix in carbon source to meet ideal C:N and moisture levels Compost for: wider application window lower storage costs ~ 15 ton/ac (17 T/ha) /year to maintain SOM

Summary: BMPs for Digestate Management To maximize nutrient and organic matter value of Digestate: Right rate Frequent analysis for nutrient content (including ph) Calibrate equipment to apply the rate that meets crop needs Uniform application Right field Select crop that needs the nutrients Ensure soil conditions maximize infiltration / minimize runoff Right application timing Apply in spring or into growing crops Don t apply in fall without a cover crop Right placement Rapid incorporation/injection to minimize ammonium-n volatilization Avoid concentrated deep placement to minimize leaching /movement to tile Right storage management Promote crusting during warm season Permanent cover helps eliminate storage losses

Contact Information: Christine Brown Nutrient Management Lead Field Crops OMAFRA Woodstock 519-537-8305 christine.brown1@ontario.ca Application in 20 cm spacings with Dribble bar