Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

Similar documents
BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

W O C H H O L Z R E G I O N A L W A T E R R E C L A M A T I O N F A C I L I T Y O V E R V I E W

Evaluation of Conventional Activated Sludge Compared to Membrane Bioreactors

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

Use of Biowin for Process Troubleshooting / Design for a Unique Wastewater

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS), MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) AND CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (AS) PROCESSES

Operation of a small scale MBR system for wastewater reuse

Inland Empire Utilities Agency CH2M HILL

TWO YEAR CASE STUDY OF INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS) AT BROOMFIELD, CO WWTP West 124th Street Broomfield, CO 80020

- 1 - Retrofitting IFAS Systems In Existing Activated Sludge Plants. by Glenn Thesing

NUTRIENT REMOVAL PROCESSES IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT. We re Glad You re Here!

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

General Information on Nitrogen

Technical Memorandum-Low Cost Retrofits for Nitrogen Removal at Wastewater Treatment Plants in the Upper Long Island Sound Watershed

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

Sulaibiya world s largest membrane water reuse project

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL PROCESSES

City of Redlands Wastewater Treatment Plant. Redlands, CA LOCATION: Carollo Engineers; CH2M HILL MBR MANUFACTURER: COMMENTS:

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

MBBR Wastewater Treatment Processes

Dr Martin Peter *, Joachim Scholz & Victor Ferre. Contents

Pilot Studies on Performance of Membrane Bio-Reactor in Treating Hong Kong Freshwater and Saline Sewage and Its Virus Rejection Ability and Mechanism

JEDDAH INDUSTRIAL CITY

EVALUATION OF CERAMNIC MBR TECHNOLOGY FOR WATER REUSE. Abstract. Introduction

Unit Treatment Processes in Water and Wastewater Engineering

Coupling Trickling Filter or RBC s with Activated Sludge

Advantages & Applications of MBBR Technologies

NITROGEN REMOVAL USING TERTIARY FILTRATION. Suzie Hatch & Colum Kearney. Sydney Water Corporation

MEMBRANE AERATED BIOFILM REACTORS OXYGENATED FUN WITH LESS CARBON COST KELLY MARTIN AND SANDEEP SATHYAMOORTHY

East Coast P Removal Technology Performance Summary

Troubleshooting Activated Sludge Processes. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

Advances in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal at Low DO Conditions

AMMONIA REMOVAL USING MLE PROCESS EXPERIENCES AT BALLARAT NORTH. David Reyne. Central Highlands Water Authority

Inland Empire Utilities Agency CH2M HILL

GRANULAR ACTIVATED SLUDGE

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Overview of Supplemental Carbon Sources for Denitrification and Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal

A COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE STUDY OF TWO TYPES OF CLOTH FILTER MEDIA APPLIED IN MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Membrane Bioreactor vs. Extended Aeration Treatment Pilot Study Effluent and Groundwater Quality Presenter Leslie Dumas

COMPARISON OF PROCESS ALTERNATIVES FOR ENHANCED NUTRIENT REMOVAL: PERSPECTIVES ON ENERGY REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS

Application of MBR for the treatment of textile wastewater

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

Closed Loop Reactor (CLR) Process. Innovative Technology, Flexible Orientation and Energy Saving Designs

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

A H. Marcela Velázquez-Carrillo Consultant to Mountain Systems Inc. on the application of Proficy for Water Treatment

Membrane Bio-Reactors (MBRs) The Future of Wastewater Technology, Science and Economy Aspects

2/22/2011. Presentation Outline. Overview of Wastewater Aeration. Basic Equation. Some Acronyms. dc dt. dc dt TDS BP T C L

Watertown Wastewater Facility Plan. August 11, 2015

Designing Single-Sludge Bionutrient Removal Systems

Biological Nutrient Removal Processes

WEFTEC.06. **Cobb County Water System, Marietta, Georgia

Reclaimed Waste Water for Power Plant Cooling Tower Water & Boiler Feed Make-up. Richard Coniglio, Business Product Manager

Taking the Waste out of WAS: Sludge Pretreatment for Beneficial Uses

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

Startup and Performance of the World s first Large Scale Primary Dissolved Air Floatation Clarifier ABSTRACT KEYWORDS INTRODUCTION

Ballasted Activated Sludge Demonstration Study SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

Current Treatment Approaches and Planning for the Future A Panel Discussion

Wastewater Treatment Processes

Module 20: Trickling Filters Answer Key

Domestic Waste Water (Sewage): Collection, Treatment & Disposal

Hydranautics Nitto DESIGN SOFTWARE and SUPPORTING TOOL

Chapter 2: Description of Treatment Facilities

ArcelorMittal Monessen operates

MOSES BASITERE 13th IWA Specialized conference on small water and wastewater Systems (SWWS)

Chapter 4 Alternatives for Centralized and Satellite Wastewater Treatment Facilities and Sites

Facilities Plan. Technical Memorandum No. TM-WW-7 Hydraulic Analysis and Effluent Pump Station

Activated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification

Proposal by Russia to delete hot sub-spot Hot sub-spot name South-West Wastewater Treatment Plant

Zero Discharge for Textile Industry

Conceptual Design for a Future Wastewater Treatment Plant

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2012

Case Study. BiOWiSH Aqua. Biological Help for the Human Race. Municipal Wastewater Bathurst Waste Water Treatment Works Australia.

JTAC Presentation May 18, Nutrient Removal Process Fundamentals and Operation

ATTACHMENT 1 GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION. BOD5 mg/l mg/l TSS mg/l mg/l NH3-N mg/l mg/l

Oxygen Transfer in a Biological Aerated Filter

Activated Sludge Process Control:

Dealing with Unexpected Wastewater Treatment Plant Disruptions. February 16, 2017

21 st Century Biofilm Reactors TREATING FOR TROUT. Northport/Leelanau Township Wastewater Treatment Facility. Presented by: Rich Grant, PE

Aeration University Advanced Concepts in Energy Efficiency

Integrated Activated Sludge and Biosolids Treatment to Conserve Energy & Waste Solids Disposal

Modelling of Wastewater Treatment Plants

OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

Flocculation Flotation Pretreatment Improves Operation of MBR Installed to Treat Snack Food Manufacturing Wastewater

BioWin 3. New Developments in BioWin. Created by process engineers.. for process engineers

ISAM INTEGRATED SURGE ANOXIC MIX

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

ASA Analytics ChemScan Process Analyzers Reprint ASA Publication #194

Polishing Ponds. Biosolids Storage. Ammonia Removal. Digesters. Thickeners. Pretreatment. Final Clarifiers. Primary Clarifiers.

Fremont Water Pollution Control Center Plant Expansion for Nutrient Removal and Wet Weather Flow Treatment

Kirill Ukhanov, GE Water & Process Technologies, Russia, describes how advanced membrane technology is helping a Russian refinery to meet stringent

Comparison on the Treatment Performance of Full-scale Sewage Treatment Plants using Conventional and Modified Activated Sludge Processes

Transcription:

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

JWPCP Background

JWPCP Water Quality Primary Clarifiers HPO Reactors Final Clarifiers Unit Influent Primary Effluent Secondary Effluent BOD mg/l 460 240 <5 COD mg/l 740 370 55 TSS mg/l 530 150 15 NH 4 -N mg N/L 41 45 42 TKN mg N/L 64 58 44 TP mg P/L 8.8 7.0 0.59

HPOAS Process 8 Treatment Units (Each Unit: Reactor + 26 Final Clarifiers) Currently Operating 6 Treatment Units Parameter Unit Design Current Operation Average Flow MGD 50 54 Reactor Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT) Hours 2.5 2.3 RAS Recycle Ratio % 30 30 MLSS mg/l 4,000 3,300 Final Clarifiers Overflow Rate gpd/ft 2 550 590 Solids Loading Rate lb/ft 2 -d 24 22 Mean Cell Residence Time (MCRT) Days 3.5 3.4 MCRT (Reactor Only) Days -- 2.3 Aerobic MCRT (Reactor Only) Days -- 1.8

Operate HPOAS to Nitrify Only Minimum aerobic MCRT: 1.5 days @ 25 o C, 0.9 days @ 30 o C Operating aerobic MCRT: 5 8 days for reliable nitrification Need to increase MLSS by decreasing sludge wasting high MLSS could cause solids loading to exceed design criteria for clarifiers Operate one more treatment unit One unit operated at <50 MGD (35 MGD?) More oxygen required 270 tons/d O 2 used for COD stabilization Additional 250 tons/d O 2 required to fully nitrify Existing HPOAS plants rarely operated in single-sludge nitrification mode

Nitrification and Denitrification (NDN) Internal Mixed Liquor Recycle Anaerobic Aerobic Aerobic Aerobic Final Clarifiers RAS Recycle Modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) Configuration Parameter Unit Water Reclamation Plants JWPCP HRT Hours 6 8 2.5 MLSS mg/l 4,000 6,000 3,300 MCRT Days 15 3.4 RAS Recycle % 100 30 Internal ML Recycle % 250 300 None Significant derating expected (50 MGD 25 MGD?)

NDN without Derating (MBR Treating Primary Effluent) Anoxic Recycle Anaerobic Aerobic Aerobic Aerobic Membranes in Existing Clarifiers MLSS: 8,000 10,000 mg/l MCRT: 15 days Aerobic Recycle Sludge Wasting Significant modifications of existing systems (pumping, membranes) Expensive

MBR Fully Nitrifies JWPCP Effluent UF RO JWPCP Secondary Effluent MBR RO UV AOP Effluent Hydrogen Peroxide

Water Quality - MBR vs. UF Parameter Units JWPCP Effluent MBR Permeate UF Permeate ph (Field) - 7.1 7.0 7.3 Ammonia mg N/L 37 <1.0 36 TKN mg N/L 40 <1.0 38 Nitrate mg N/L <0.10 39 <0.10 Nitrite mg N/L 0.03 0.02 0.04 Phosphate mg P/L 0.50 0.29 0.25 COD mg/l 55 32 -- TOC mg/l 16 9.2 13 Alkalinity, Total mg CaCO 3 /L 373 100 372

Summary of MBR Advantages Removes biodegradable organic matter and degrades some trace organics Better water quality feed to RO RO permeate TOC always < 0.5 mg/l Fully nitrifies secondary effluent less acid needed for ph adjustment upstream of RO Less fouling, less cleaning time vs. UF Membranes can be operated at 23 gfd (similar to UF membranes treating non-ndn secondary effluent)

Nitrify JWPCP Effluent Upstream of UF-RO with Biological Aerated Filter (BAF) BAF UF RO JWPCP Secondary Effluent MBR RO UV AOP Effluent Hydrogen Peroxide

Biological Aerated Filter o Up-flow reactor with proprietary media for biofilm attachment o Applications: nitrogen removal with simultaneous particle removal o Several manufacturers (Kruger, IDI, BKT)

BAF Operations o Up-flow filtration (operation) o Gravity based down-flow backwash o Particles are filtered by the floating media Influent Operation Effluent Backwash

BKT s BAF Pilot System One column for nitrification and one for denitrification (need external electron donor) Expanded polypropylene media Title 22 approved for tertiary filtration

Schematic Diagram Nitrification Denitrification Backwash Backwash Acetic Acid

Operating Conditions of Nitrifying BAF Parameters Units Flow (gpm) 1.7 2.6 3.3 4.0 Empty Bed Contact Time min 52 34 27 22 Hydraulic Loading Rate gpm/ft 2 0.9 1.3 1.7 2.0 NH 4 -N Loading Rate lb N/1000 ft 3 -d 65 95 124 146 Kg/m 3 -d 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.4 DO mg/l 5.0~6.5 Temperature F 78~93

Nitrification Capacity of Nitrifying BAF

Nitrifying BAF Performance Parameters Units Influent Effluent Average Min Max Average Min Max NH 4 -N mg N/L 38.1 34.9 40.5 4.2 <1 12.4 NO 3 -N mg N/L ND - - 31.2 20.8 37 NO 2 -N mg N/L ND - - 2.7 0.1 8.54 Alkalinity mg CaCO 3 /L 333 218 380 118 92 130 COD mg/l 58 43 75 48 41 61 BOD mg/l 3.5 3 4 - - - TSS mg/l 10.5 9 12 5.0 3.1 7.9 Turbidity NTU 4.4 2.3 16 1.5 0.8 2.5

90 Nitrifying BAF COD Removal 80 70 Influent COD Influent; Med. = 52 mg/l Intermediate Tank Effluent; Med. = 47 mg/l 60 COD (mg/l) 50 40 30 20 10 0

Nitrifying BAF TSS Removal 40 35 30 Influent (Median = 10) Influent; Med. = 10 mg/l Effluent; Med. = 8.3 mg/l Intermediate Tank (Median = 8.3) 25 TSS (mg/l) 20 15 10 5 0

Summary JWPCP s HPOAS system is not designed for nitrification or biological nitrogen removal; upgrade would result in substantial derating or significant costs. JWPCP effluent can be nitrified separately; options include MBR or nitrifying BAF followed by UF. MBR-RO-AOP has been extensively tested and has a number of advantages.

Wastewater Treatment Facilities Map Lancaster 14 20 Palmdale Valencia 26 32 Saugus 35 27 Sanitation Districts of Los City Angeles of County Los Angeles D.C. Tillman L.A. Glendale So. Bay Cities 4 Hyperion La Canada 5 JWPCP 34 28 17 Whittier Narrows 23 8 1 16 3 29 2 15 San Jose Creek 18 Los Coyotes 19 Long Beach 22 Pomona 21 Trunk Sewers 9 Terminal Island

JOINT WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT - JWPCP Photo of Early Plant Operation

Aerial View of the JWPCP 285 MGD N

JWPCP Treatment Areas N Biosolids Handling Primary Secondary

JWPCP PROCESS FLOW

Primary Treatment Area CCPP Circular Digesters

Inlet Works

Aerated Grit Chambers & Inlet Pumps

PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION TANKS & SECONDARY INFLUENT PUMP STATION

Anaerobic Digesters

Power Generation

Two Stage Treatment of Air in Primary Treatment Biotrickling Filters + Activated Carbon Biotrickling Filters Activated Carbon

Secondary Treatment SEPS Chlorine Station Reactors Clarifiers

Secondary Treatment Reactors & Clarifiers

Reactor Influent Force Main Reactors A B C D E F G H Clarifiers Effluent Channel

JWPCP Secondary Oxygen and Liquid Process Flows Arrangement No. 1 Mixed Liquor To 2 o Clarifiers Liquid Stage Numbers 4 3 2 First-Stage 1 SubSurface Mixers { Vent { { { 10 1 11 1 12 1 9 4 5 6 3 8 2 7 1 Gas Out High-Purity Oxygen Gas In Primary Effluent and Return Activated Sludge

JWPCP Secondary Oxygen and Liquid Process Flows Arrangement No. 2 Air In Mixed Liquor To 2 o Clarifiers Air Out Vent Gas Out Liquid Stage Numbers 4 3 2 First-Stage 1 SubSurface Mixers { { { { 10 1 11 1 12 1 9 4 5 6 3 8 2 7 1 High-Purity Oxygen Gas In Primary Effluent and Return Activated Sludge

Activated Sludge Process

Cryogenic Oxygen Separation Plants

JWPCP Tunnel/Outfall 2 Tunnels 4 Outfalls 2 miles out Over 160 feet below surface

Solids Handling Facility Dewatering Building Truck Loading Stations Biosolids Silos Biofilters

Dewatering Building

Truck Loading Stations

Biosolids Handling Facility Biofilters

Questions?