Groundwater recovery simulation for determination of post-mining lake formation at the Sangan iron mine, Mashhad, Iran

Similar documents
Anisotropy and bedding effects on the hydro geological regime in a confined aquifer to design an appropriate dewatering system

Numerical modelling of the groundwater inflow to an advancing open pit mine: Kolahdarvazeh pit, Central Iran

Potential effects evaluation of dewatering an underground mine on surface water and groundwater located in a rural area

Determination of hydrogeological parameters from pumping of water wells in Alberta

Well Hydraulics. The time required to reach steady state depends on S(torativity) T(ransmissivity) BC(boundary conditions) and Q(pumping rate).

Comparison between Neuman (1975) and Jacob (1946) application for analysing pumping test data of unconfined aquifer

SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY GROUND WATER HYDRAULICS

CHAPTER 2. Objectives of Groundwater Modelling

Lab 6 - Pumping Test. Pumping Test. Laboratory 6 HWR 431/

Aquifer Science Staff, January 2007

Ground-Water Flow to Wells Introduction. Drawdown Caused by a Pumping Well

SECTION2 Drainage Control for Surface Mines. Some Technical Aspects of Open Pit Mine Dewatering

RESULTS OF AN AQUIFER TEST AT VERMILLION, SOUTH DAKOTA

Rudd Westside Winery Pump Test and Well Interference Analysis 4603 Westside Road, Healdsburg

Numerical Modeling of Groundwater Flow in Karst Aquifer, Makeng Mining Area

HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE HUMBOLDT RIVER BASIN, IMPACTS OF OPEN-PIT MINE DEWATERING AND PIT LAKE FORMATION

Groundwater. Groundwater Movement. Groundwater Movement Recharge: the infiltration of water into any subsurface formation.

Stormwater Retention Pond Recovery Analysis

Module 2. The Science of Surface and Ground Water. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

Steady Flow in Confined Aquifer

Information Request 11

ESTIMATION OF GROUNDWATER RECHARGE IN NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY, DELHI USING GROUNDWATER MODELING

Aquifer Physics Modes for Hydrogeological Modeling an Application of the COMSOL Physics Builder

Purpose. Utilize groundwater modeling software to forecast the pumping drawdown in a regional aquifer for public drinking water supply

MEASUREMENT OF GROUNDWATER TEMPERATURE FOR UNDERGROUND THERMAL UTILIZATION

Post-closure mining pit lake water quality modelling David Dettrick 1, Brian Barnett 2, Damon Grace 3, Hiro Toki 4

EART 204. Water. Dr. Slawek Tulaczyk. Earth Sciences, UCSC

*** IN THE PUMPING WELL

Water Management for Mines. Solutions and Technology

STAGNATION POINTS: ANALYTICAL THEORIC APPROACH

The true cost of groundwater

Groundwater modelling to assess the effect of interceptor drainage and lining

DHI Sverige AB, Honnörsgatan 16, P.O. Box 3289, SE Växjö, Sweden, 3

Numerical Groundwater Model for the Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District

Advice to decision maker on coal mining project

Evaluation of Groundwater Resources in alluvial aquifer Based on MODFLOW Program, Case Study: Evan plain (Iran)

9 Multi-layered aquifer systems

Interaction Matrix Method in Hydrogeological Analyses at Coal Mines

Simulation of horizontal well performance using Visual MODFLOW

Case Study A Comparison of Well Efficiency and Aquifer Test Results Louvered Screen vs. Continuous Wire-Wrapped Screen Big Pine, California

How Groundwater Interacts with Lakes and Streams

Leaky Aquifers. log s drawdown. log time. will the red observation well look more like?.. A infinite aquifer. D none of the above

Lecture 20: Groundwater Introduction

BAEN 673 / February 18, 2016 Hydrologic Processes

International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, Volume 3, Issue 8, August ISSN

AUDIT OF MODEL PREDICTIONS OF DEWATERING REQUIREMENTS FOR A LARGE OPEN PIT GOLD MINE

POROSITY, SPECIFIC YIELD & SPECIFIC RETENTION. Physical properties of

Aquifer Characterization and Drought Assessment Ocheyedan River Alluvial Aquifer

Effect of the Underlying Groundwater System on the Rate of Infiltration of Stormwater Infiltration Structures.

Using groundwater flow simulation of the Chania Plain area to propose a proper irrigation plan

GLY 155 Introduction to Physical Geology, W. Altermann. Grotzinger Jordan. Understanding Earth. Sixth Edition

APPENDIX 8A HYDROGEOLOGICAL MODEL PRE-MINING, DURING MINING, AND CLOSURE

Unsaturated Seepage Modeling Made Easy

Aquifer Type. Karst. Rock. Aquifer Characteristics. Permeability Mostly 1 0 Mostly 2 0 Almost All 2 0 Flow Slow, laminar Possibly fast/turbulent

Seepage Estimation through Earth Dams

Using GIS, MODFLOW and MODPATH for groundwater management of an alluvial aquifer of the River Sieg, Germany

CHAPTER 13 OUTLINE The Hydrologic Cycle and Groundwater. Hydrologic cycle. Hydrologic cycle cont.

SUITABILITY FOR IN-SITU RECOVERY (ISR) CONFIRMED

Using Fractran Fracture Flow Modeling in Tandem with Modflow to Assist in the Development of Wellfield Protection Zones for Municipal Wells in Bedrock

GEO-SLOPE International Ltd, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Filling Pond Head verses Volume Functions

Numerical Simulation of Basal Aquifer Depressurization in the Presence of Dissolved Gas

Groundwater modelling meets geochemistry: Building the bridge between FEFLOW and PHREEQC with IFMPhreeqc

Modelling shearing characteristics of reinforced concrete

Groundwater Flow Evaluation and Spatial Geochemical Analysis of the Queen City Aquifer, Texas

Rapid Drawdown with Effective Stress

Prediction for Natural Recharging In Langat Basin and Ukm Campus as Case Study

22 Tubewell Drainage Systems

Applying landforming to reclamation: A case study in Central Appalachia

CHAPTER ONE OCCURRENCE OF GROUNDWATER

Evaluation of Void Water intercepted by Werris Creek Coal Mine Operations

GROUNDWATER COMPONENT IN MINING OPERATION-MINING HYDROLOGY

Subject: Peer review of Duntroon Quarry hydrogeologic modelling: Report #1

Hydrological measures of success for a pilot bioclogging study at Largs North, South Australia

Applying Polyacrylamide (PAM) to Reduce Seepage Loss of Water Through Unlined Canals

Analysis of the Cromwell, Minnesota Well 4 (593593) Aquifer Test CONDUCTED ON MAY 24, 2017 CONFINED QUATERNARY GLACIAL-FLUVIAL SAND AQUIFER

Estimating Streambed and Aquifer Parameters from a Stream/Aquifer Analysis Test

Understanding Earth Fifth Edition

Capão Xavier Mine Water Drainage Management (Minas Gerais, Brazil)

EFFECTIVENESS OF UNSATURATED DRAINAGE LAYER IN WATER DIVERSION UNDER DIFFERENT RAINFALL CONDITIONS

PE Exam Review - Geotechnical

Long-Range Hydrology Study

Occurrence of Iron in Surface Waters of the Upper St. Johns River Basin

Environmental Assessment

List of Tables... iii List of Figures... iii Executive Summary... ES - i

Artificial Groundwater Recharge through Recharge Tube Wells: A Case Study

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS for HYDRO(GEO)LOGICAL SERVICES

Standard Guidelines for the Design, Installation, Maintenance, and Operation of Urban Subsurface Drainage, ASCE/EWRI 12-, 13-, 14-05

Proceedings of the 13 th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology Athens, Greece, 5-7 September 2013

APPENDIX 5: SAMPLE MODEL RESULTS

CIV E Geotechnical Engineering I Consolidation

9 Seepage and Groundwater Flow

Estimating the Seasonal High Water Table: A Mix of Art & Science

THE ECONOMIC CHALLENGES OF DEWATERING AT THE VICTOR DIAMOND MINE IN NORTHERN ONTARIO, CANADA

ENVIRONMENTAL HYDROGEOLOGY

RIDDICK ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Minimizing Energy Use in Large Groundwater Supply Systems

NOTE ON WELL SITING AT CORNER OF CASTLE VALLEY DRIVE AND SHAFER LANE FOR TOWN OF CASTLE VALLEY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH

Simulating the Performance of a Dry Stack Tailings Design for Water Control Permitting

Application of Energy Concepts to Groundwater Flow: Adaptive Modeling of a Leaky Aquifer

Infiltration well and urban drainage concept

Transcription:

University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences 2009 Groundwater recovery simulation for determination of post-mining lake formation at the Sangan iron mine, Mashhad, Iran Ahmad Aryafar Shahrood University of Technology F. Doulati Ardejani Shahrood University of Technology E. Baafi University of Wollongong, ebaafi@uow.edu.au http://ro.uow.edu.au/engpapers/5450 Publication Details Aryafar, A., Ardejani, F. Doulati. & Baafi, E. Y. (2009). Groundwater recovery simulation for determination of post-mining lake formation at the Sangan iron mine, Mashhad, Iran. Journal of Geology and Mining Research, 1 (5), 111-117. Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: research-pubs@uow.edu.au

Journal of Geology and Mining Research Vol. 1(5) pp. 111-117 July, 2009 Available online http://www.academicjournals.org/jgmr 2009 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Groundwater recovery simulation for determination of post-mining lake formation at the Sangan iron mine, Mashhad, Iran A. Aryafar 1 *, F. Doulati Ardejani 1 and E. Baafi 2 1 Faculty of Mining, Petroleum and Geophysics, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, P. O. Box: 36155-316, Iran. 2 School of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. Accepted 2 June, 2009 A two-dimensional axisymetric finite element software SEEP/W was used to simulate the groundwater recovery process in wells entirely confined in an aquifer at Sangan iron mine in Iran. The simulation model predicted very well with the results obtained from both analytical method and field data for well recovery process. It was inferred from the results that the rate of groundwater recovery process is highest immediately after mine closure with no dewatering program. The paper presents a methodology for predicting how the natural groundwater regime can be established to its equilibrium conditions after mining operation has ceased. Key words: Numerical model, finite element, Sangan iron mine, groundwater recovery, pumping well, SEEP/W, post-mining lake. INTRODUCTION In many active mines where mining is carried out under large bodies of water in aquifers, water inflow occurs from the surrounding layer towards the mining excavation (Doulati Ardejani et al., 2003, 2005, 2007; Doulati Ardejani and Singh, 2004; Aryafar et al., 2007). With the development of mining, groundwater invasion and impacts of groundwater drainage, such as regional groundwater table lowering, overlapping cones of depression, subsidence, and water quality deterioration are environmental problems which endanger mining production and human life (Keqiang et al., 2006). In the case of a confined aquifer with an impervious layer, the layer could break during the mining operation and water with high pressure can easily flow into the mining excavation. During the mine life, water is normally pumped reduce its inflow into mines although this action impacts on groundwater drainage, such as regional piezometric surface lowering, overlapping cones of depression, groundwater rebound after cessation of dewatering and the associated soil settlement and *Corresponding author. E-mail: ahariafar@yahoo.com. Tel.: +98 (273) 3335509. land subsidence. At the end of mine life pumping activities cease and the natural groundwater regime is re-established to its pre-mining equilibrium position. This process is normally called as water table rebound or water table recovery (Doulati Ardejani and Singh, 2004). Comprehensive studies into groundwater recovery have been reported by others including Norton (1983) and Reed and Singh (1986). These studies mainly focussed on groundwater recovery problems associated with open cut mines and showed that the groundwater recovery takes place at a faster rate immediately after cessation of dewatering operation and continues indefinitely at a relatively slower rate. Many attempts have been made to understand how groundwater recovers in surface mines using both analytical and mathematical models (Naugle and Atkinson 19-93, Vandersluis et al., 1995; Lewis 1999; Shevenell 2000). These approaches have been mostly limited to the unconfined aquifer to simulate the rates at which the pit lakes are filled. Other models have been developed for groundwater recovery and associated spoil mass settlement for open cut mines (Davis and Zabolotney 1996). This article presents a two-dimensional axisymetric finite element model using SEEP/W (Geo-Slope International Ltd.

112 J. Geol. Min. Res. Figure1. Geographical location of Sangan iron mine. 2008) software to simulate the groundwater recovery process in wells entirely intersecting a confined aquifer. Unlike other models, this approach seeps into a confined aquifer using Sangan iron mine in Iran as a case study. Such an approach is useful in environmental management plan during the design stage of surface mining operation. SITE DESCRIPTION Climate and geography Sangan Iron Mine (SIM) is located about 280 km southeast of Mashhad and about 16 km north of Sangan, Iran. SIM is the second largest iron mine in Iran, with about 1200 Mt ore reserve (Madan Kav Company, final report of detailed exploration of Sangan iron mine, 2002).The mine is located at latitude of 34 24' N and a longitude of 60 16' E at an average elevation of the mine is 1650 m above sea level.the site is characterised by an arid warm climatic condition. The average annual precipitation at the site varies from 140-200 mm. The annual relative humidity is 40%. Figure 1 shows the geo-graphical position of the mine. Geological settings Sangan ore deposit is recognised as skarn iron type which is elongated from east to west of Taleb mountain. Various rock types which can be recognised in the Sangan mine consist of Sarnosar granite, siltstone, sandstone and quartzite complex, north skarn unit, shale and siltstone, south skarn unit, volcanic complex. The iron ores in the Sangan area are mined as either high grade massive iron or low grade iron or oxidised zone and sulphide. Sangan iron deposit comprises three minable zones namely western, central and eastern zones. The western part is almost ready to extract. The detailed exploration works are mainly concentrated on two other parts. The western part covers an area about 6 km 2 and includes five anomalies as A, A, B, south C and north C. Hydrogeological studies A geophysical resistivity survey was performed in order to investigate the hydrogeology of the study area. The geophysical results indicate an average thickness of 80 m of fully saturated confined aquifer throughout the mine area by clay and marl layers. Sixteen pumping wells were drillled and tested in order to determine the hydrodynamic parameters of the aquifer. During the pumping tests the variations of the hydraulic head were monitored in the observation wells (Mahvi, 2004). Theis and Cooper-Jacob analytical equations (Freeze and Cherry, 1979) were used to determine the hydraulic parameters of the confined aquifer. The average values of 0.001, 8.755 m/day and 700 m 2 /day

Aryafar et al. 113 Figure 2. The ASTER image of the study area showing pumping wells position, access roads, water courses and Sangan Iron Mine. were calculated for storativity, hydraulic conductivity and transmissivity of the aquifer respectively. Figure 2 shows the ASTER image of the study area, in which the pumping wells, access roads, water courses and the Sangan iron mine. MODELLING TOOL A two-dimensional finite element groundwater modelling software SEEP/W (Geo-Slope International Ltd., 2008) was used to simulate groundwater recovery process in wells entirely penetrated into a confined aquifer in Sangan iron mine. Compared to similar softwares, SEEP/W has the capability to model both saturated and unsaturated flow. In porous medium, the hydraulic conductivity and the quantity of water (amount of water stored) may change as a function of pore-water pressure. SEEP/W may be used to model the relationships as continuous functions (International Geoslope Ltd., 2008). Furthermore, the SEEP/W can simulate heterogeneous hydraulic properties such as hydraulic conductivity and storage coefficient in an isotropic and heterogeneous flow system (Doulati Ardejani and Singh, 2004). MODEL GOVERNING EQUATION The SEEP/W model solves the following governing partial differential equation for given initial and boundary conditions are specified for the problem under simulation (Freeze and Cherry, 1979): h h ( K ) + ( K y ) C ( h) + Q = 0 x x y y t X (1)

114 J. Geol. Min. Res. numerical techniques to study of the groundwater rebound mechanism after mining: Case study 1- Simulation of well recovery in an artificial confined infinite aquifer Figure 3. Finite element representation of the problem. Where, K x, K y = hydraulic conductivities in the x and y m directions respectively ( ) s m s Q = recharge or discharge per unit volume ( ) h = hydraulic head (m) t = time (s) C = slope of the water storage curve (dimensionless) (Geo-Slope International Ltd., 2008). The Galerkin technique (Pinder and Frind, 1972) was used by SEEP/W model to solve Equation 1 for the given boundary conditions. ANALYTICAL EQUATION FOR PREDICTION OF RESIDUAL DRAWDOWN The following analytical solution presented by Theis (Kruseman and De Ridder 1979) was used to calculate the residual drawdown after dewatering has ceased. Q 4kmt 4kmt Δ h = ln( ) ln( ) 2 2 (2) 4πkm r s r s Where, t = time of rebound commences (s) s = storativity in rebound stage m = aquifer thickness (m) s = storativity in dewatering stage r = well radius (m) t = pumping time (s) Q = pumping rate (m^3/s) K = hydraulic conductivity (m/s) Δ h = residual drawdown (m) MODEL VERIFICATION Three case study examples were modelled using the above 3 This example compares the results of a dewatering test in a confined infinite aquifer under transient conditions using an analytical solution incorporating the Theis equation (Equation 2) with those results obtained by the SEEP/W numerical model. The recovery period after stopping pumping test was taken into consideration in this example. The total hydraulic head in the confined aquifer was 20 m. The hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer was 0.005 m/s. The storage coefficient of the aquifer was 0.0001. Thickness of the aquifer, well radius, pumping rate and transmissivity of the aquifer were 10 m, 0.2 m, 0.15 m 3 2 / s and 0.0005 m / s respectively. A finite element mesh consisting of 62 nodes and 30 elements was constructed in a single layer 10 m thick (Figure 3). An axisymmetric analysis was used to simulate radial flow to a well. The rectangular grid contained fournodded elements with an infinite element at the right end of the model. 10 time steps were considered for the transient simulation of well recovery. The final prediction of the hydraulic head calculated during the well dewatering simulation was used as an initial condition for the modelling of the recovery process. No flow boundary conditions were assigned at the top and bottom boundaries of the model to describe impermeable layers in the aquifer. A fixed-head boundary value equal to 20 m was specified at the right side of the grid. Figure 4 compares the residual draw-downs versus time predicted by the numerical model and those drawdowns calculated using the Theis analytical solution. As Figure 4 shows, a close agreement was achieved between the analytical results and the numerical predictions of the residual drawdown. The average error is about 1%. Case Study 2 - Modelling of the groundwater rebound process in the well No.D4W1 at Sangan iron mine In the second example, results from the numerical model are compared to those from an analytical Theis equation, and field data. The data were obtained from a dewatering test performed in a fully penetrating well (No.D4W1) in a confined aquifer at Sangan iron mine. This simulation considers both pumping and recovery periods. The thickness of the aquifer, hydraulic conductivity, storage coefficient, transmissivity and initial hydraulic head were 66 m, 0.000271 m/s, 0.00007849, 0.0179 m 2 /s and 928.19 m respectively. The well radius was 0.3048 m and the dewatering rate was 0.0358 m 3 /s. To perform the simulation numerically, a finite element grid was constructed in a single layer 66 m thick. The grid had a rectangular shape with 64 nodes and 32 elements. An axisymmetric sim-

Aryafar et al. 115 Residual drawdown (m) 20 15 10 5 Numerical SEEP/W model Theis equation 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Time (s) Figure 4. Comparison of residual drawdown versus time predicted by the numerical SEEP/W model and those calculated by the Theis solution at the pumping well axis. Figure 5. Comparison of analytical, numerical and field monitored hydraulic head as a function of time during dewatering and recovery periods in well No. D4W1. ulation was considered for this problem. A steady state simulation was first performed to establish an initial condition for the transient analysis of the dewatering test. No flow boundary conditions were applied at the top and bottom boundaries of the model. A fixed-head boundary value equal to 928.19 m was specified at the right-hand side of the model. A flux boundary condition was assigned at the left side next to the dewatering well to take the dewatering rate into consideration. A transient simulation was then carried out to model dewatering test. The final prediction of the hydraulic head calculated during the well dewatering modelling was used as an initial condition for the simulation of the rebound process. The flux boundary condition was removed from the left-hand side of the model. To execute a transient simulation, 32 time steps were considered. Figure 5 compares the variations of total hydraulic head versus time during dewatering and recovery periods. The numerical results using g Theis analytical solution compared very well with field data associated with the well No.D4W1 at Sangan iron mine. The relative error between the two methods is less than 2%. Case Study 3 - Prediction of the hydraulic head variations during groundwater recovery period (residual drawdown) in well No. 2W The third case study deals with the modelling of groundwater groundwater rebound problem in a fully penetrated well, No. 2W, in a confined aquifer at Sangan iron mine under transient flow conditions. The aquifer had a hydraulic conductivity of 0.000093 m/s and a storativity of 0.000278. The initial hydraulic head was 1024.75 m. The dewatering rate was 0.0361 m 3 /s and the well radius was 0.3048 m. The aquifer had a transmissivity of 0.00398 m 2 /s. A finite element mesh was constructed with 40 elements and 82 nodes in a single layer 40 m thick. An axisymmetric analysis was performed to model radial flow to the well. An infinite element was specified at the right end of the mode describing an infinite boundary for the confined aquifer. Figure 6 shows the finite element grid of the problem. 34 time steps were considered for the transient simulation of the well rebound process. The final estimation of the hydraulic head computed during the well dewatering modelling was used as an initial condition for the simulation of the recovery process. No flow boundary conditions were applied at the top and bottom boundaries of the model representing impermeable layers in the aquifer. A fixed-head boundary value equal to 1024.75 m was specified at the right-hand side of the model. Figure 7 compares the residual drawdown as a function of time during well rebound period, predicted by the SEEP/W model, those calculated by the Theis analytical solution and field data at 5 m of the pumping well axis. Table 1 outlines

116 J. Geol. Min. Res. Figure 6. Finite element model of the problem Figure 7. Comparison of analytical, numerical and field monitored residual drawdown as a function of time during rebound period in well No. 2W. Table 1. Comparison of analytical, numerical and field monitored residual drawdown at 5 m of the well No.2W and relative errors. Method Residual drawdown (m) Relative error (%) Field Data 5.24 ------ SEEP/W model 5.1 2.67 Theis solution 5.44 3.81 showed that the recovery process would be very fast immediately after mine closure and cessation of dewatering program at Sangan mine due to the considerable difference in hydraulic heads imposed by dewatering. The results of such modelling can be used for designing an effective environmental management program in order to minimise environmental effects arising from the mining activity. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS the residual drawdowns calculated by different methods at 5 m of the well axis and the relative errors. Conclusion Simulation of groundwater recovery process in the pumping wells provides valuable information to predict the rate at which post-mining lake forms. A two-dimensional axisymetric finite element model called SEEP/W was used to simulate the groundwater recovery process in wells entirely penetrated into a confined aquifer at Sangan iron mine. The accuracy of the model was evaluated by comparing the results obtained from Theis analytical solution and field data and a close agreement was achieved. The transient simulation of groundwater rebound The authors would like to acknowledge the helps provided by the Faculty of Mining, Petroleum and Geophysics, Shahrood University of Technology and the School of Civil, Mining and Environment, University of Wollongong for providing the Geo-Slope software. REFERENCES Aryafar A, Doulati Ardejani F, Singh RN, Jodeiri Shokri B (2007). Prediction of groundwater inflow and height of the seepage face in a deep open pit mine using numerical finite element model and analytical solutions. In: Cidu R., Frau F. (Eds.), Proc, Water in Mining Environments Symp, Cagliari, Italy, pp. 313-317. Davis AD, Zabolotney GA (1996) Ground-water simulations for the determination of post mining recharge rates at the Belle Ayr Mine, Min. Eng. 48(11): 80-83.

Aryafar et al. 117 Doulati Ardejani F, Baafi EY, Shafaei SZ (2007). Modelling of groundwater recovery process for prediction of land settlement in surface mines. Int. J. Min. Reclamation Environ. 21 (4): 271-281. Doulati Ardejani F, Singh RN (2004). Assessment of ground water rebound in backfilled open cut mines using the finite element method. J. Rock Mech. Tunnelling Tech. 10 (1): 1 16. Doulati Ardejani F, Singh RN, Baafi EY, Porter I (2003). A finite element model to: 2. Simulate groundwater rebound problems in backfilled open cut mines. Mine Water Environ. 22 (1): 39-44. Doulati Ardejani F, Singh RN, Baafi EY, Shafaei SZ (2005). A numerical model to simulate groundwater and mining interactions. 20 th World Mining congress and Expo 2005, Tehran, Iran, 673-680. Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979). Groundwater, Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 604. GEO-SLOPE International Ltd. (2008). SEEP/W for finite element seepage analysis, Available online at: http://www.geoslope.com/products/seepw.asp. Keqiang H, Dong G, Xianwei W (2006). Mechanism of the water invasion of Gaoyang Iron Mine, China and its impacts on the mine groundwater environment. J. of Environ. Geol. 49:1163-1172 Kruseman GP, De Ridder NA (1979) Analysis and evaluation of pumping test data, Bulletin 11, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, The Netherlands, pp. 200. Lewis RL (1999) Predicting the steady-state water quality of pit lakes. Min. Eng. 51(10): 54-58. Madan Kav Company (2002). Final report of detailed exploration of Sangan iron mine, p. 185. Mahvi MR (2004). Report of detailed groundwater exploration in Khaf Basin, International Minerals Engineering Consulting Co, P 250. Naugle GD, Atkinson LC (1993). Estimating the rate of post-mining filling of pit lakes, Mine. Eng. 45(4): 402-404. Norton PJ (1983). A study of groundwater control in British surface mining, Ph.D. Thesis, Nottingham University, p. 460. Pinder GF, Frind EO (1972). Application of Galerkin s procedure to aquifer analysis, Water Resour. Res. 8(1): 108-120. Reed SM, Singh RN (1986). Groundwater recovery problems associated with opencast mines backfills in the United Kingdom. Int. J. Mine Water 5 (3): 47-74. Shevenell L (2000) Analytical method for predicting filling rates of mining pit lakes: example from the Getchell Mine, Nevada, Min Eng. 52(3): 53-60. Vandersluis GD, Straskraba V, Effner SA (1995) Hydrogeological and geochemical aspects of lakes forming in abandoned open pit mines, in: Hotchkiss WR, Downey JS, Gutentag ED, Moore JE (Eds), Proc on Water Resources at Risk, American Institute of Hydrology, pp. 162-177.