Available online at I-SEEC Proceeding - Science and Engineering (2013)

Similar documents
Nitrogen Transformation within Constructed Wetlands Purifying Secondary Treated Sewage

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Constructed Wetlands

Analysis of Residential Subsurface. SF constructed wetlands. Performance in Northern Alabama

A Hybrid Constructed Wetland System for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment

Pollutants Transformation and Removal within Constructed Wetlands Hybrid Systems

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

Effect of the start-up length on the biological nutrient removal process

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS), MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) AND CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (AS) PROCESSES

ADVANCED CONTROL SYSTEM OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESSES USING IN- SITU AMMONIUM AND NITRATE PROBES

Treatment of Landfill Leachate by Subsurface-Flow Constructed Wetland: A Microcosm Test

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

Removal of Nutrients from Landfill Leachate Using Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetland Planted With Limnocharis flava and Scirpus atrovirens

Membrane Bioreactor vs. Extended Aeration Treatment Pilot Study Effluent and Groundwater Quality Presenter Leslie Dumas

AGRICULTURAL MINERAL SOIL ADDITIVES FOR PASSIVE NITRATE REMOVAL

COD REMOVAL OF CARDBOARD FACTORY WASTEWATER BY UPFLOW ANAEROBIC FILTER

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Biological Nitrogen and COD Removal of Nutrient-Rich Wastewater Using Aerobic and Anaerobic Reactors

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

WASTEWATER TREATMENT. Nelson Environmental Inc. Nelson Environmental Inc.

Evaluation of gradual hydroponic system for decentralized. wastewater treatment and reuse in rural areas of Palestine.

Nutrient Removal Enhancement Using Process Automation at Holly Hill

USING NUMERICAL SIMULATION SOFTWARE FOR IMPROVING WASTEWATER TREATMENT EFFICIENCY

Effect of Light Exposure and Water Depth on the Performance of Algae Reactor during the Treatment of Surabaya municipal wastewater

Total Solids (TS) - material remaining after evaporation of sample liquid

SUSTAINABLE EMISSION REDUCTION OF AMMONIUM FROM A LANDFILL BODY USING THE ANAMMOX-PROCESS AT THE VLAGHEIDE LANDFILL IN SCHIJNDEL (NL)

Operation of a small scale MBR system for wastewater reuse

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Short-term and long-term studies of the co-treatment of landfill leachate and municipal wastewater

Lysis and Autooxidation. Organic Nitrogen (net growth) Figure by MIT OCW.

Lagoons Operation and Management in New Brunswick

Three Cost-effective Public Domain On-site Sewage Treatment Technologies Verified for Their Ability to Denitrify

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

MARPAK modular biomedia WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Figure Trickling Filter

Aerobic biological treatment of thermophilically digested sludge

Modelling of Wastewater Treatment Plants

Adapting Constructed Wetlands Treatment of Domestic Wastewater for New Reuse Applications

Designing Single-Sludge Bionutrient Removal Systems

Application of MBR for the treatment of textile wastewater

N2O EMISSION FROM A NITRITATION DOUBLE-SLUDGE SYSTEM TREATING WASTEWATER WITH A HIGH CONCENTRATION OF AMMONIUM

Wastewater Treatment Processes

Dr. Youbin Zheng, Siobhan Dunets and Eric Rozema University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Nitrogen removal during the treatment of wastewater and landfill leachate in a biological aerated filter

Inlet Process air and wash cycle scour air. Air grid Floor Nozzle

Advantages & Applications of MBBR Technologies

Module 20: Trickling Filters Answer Key

Coal Ash Concrete Blocks for Reduction of Algal Growth and Ammonia Toxicity

Municipal wastewater treatment using constructed wetlands

Nitrogen Removal in a Redox-Stratified Constructed Wetland System

2014 ASSINIBOINE RIVER MONITORING REPORT

INTRODUCTION BMP DATABASE PROJECTS IN PA

PRODUCTION OF BIODEGRADABLE PLASTICS POLYHYDROXYALKANOATE IN THE ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESSES USING A SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Wastewater Treatment Processes

CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS: An Overview of the Technology

Augmentation of self-purification capacity of sewer pipe by immobilizing microbes on the pipe surface

General Information on Nitrogen

Design of horizontal and vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands treating industrial wastewater

A Summary of the International Stormwater BMP Database

Domestic Waste Water (Sewage): Collection, Treatment & Disposal

Thirteenth International Water Technology Conference, IWTC , Hurghada, Egypt

Municipal Wastewater Treatment Using Barium Alginate Entrapped Activated Sludge: Adjustment of Utilization Conditions

Triplepoint Environmental

Short-Cut Nitrogen Removal: A State of the Art Review

JEDDAH INDUSTRIAL CITY

Application of MBR Technology in Municipal Wastewater Treatment

Fixed-Film Processes

Environment Protection Engineering

The developing countries are focusing on cost for SFCW systems.

Seventh International Water Technology Conference IWTC7 Egypt 1-3 April 2003 SECONDARY TREATMENT OF SULLAGE WASTEWATER

Determination of design criteria for UASB reactors as a wastewater pretreatment system in tropical small communities

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR WITH POLYPROPYLENE AND WOOL MEDIA

MEMBRANE AERATED BIOFILM REACTORS OXYGENATED FUN WITH LESS CARBON COST KELLY MARTIN AND SANDEEP SATHYAMOORTHY

Presence And Effects Of Aromatic Hydrocarbons On Sewage Treatment Efficiency

Presented By: Kevin Bossy. The Supplier Perspective: Accelerating the Adoption of Innovative Solutions

MBBR Wastewater Treatment Processes

Pilot Studies on Performance of Membrane Bio-Reactor in Treating Hong Kong Freshwater and Saline Sewage and Its Virus Rejection Ability and Mechanism

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

Environmental Biotechnology Cooperative Research Centre Date submitted: March 2008 Date published: March 2011

NITROGEN REMOVAL USING TERTIARY FILTRATION. Suzie Hatch & Colum Kearney. Sydney Water Corporation

Evaluation of the potential implementation of a FWS within an Italian natural wetland for the area restoration and maintenance: Torre Flavia Wetland

OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

A full-scale biological aerated filtration system application in the treatment of paints industry wastewater

Industrial Wastewater Treatment Using High Rate Activated Sludge and Alum Additive

SOLUTIONS AND EQUIPMENT FOR LEACHATE TREATMENT

WEFTEC.06. **Cobb County Water System, Marietta, Georgia

LABORATORY PROJECT: IMPACT OF VARIABLE LOADING ON A FIXED FILM REACTOR VERSUS A SUSPENDED GROWTH REACTOR

NUTRIENT OPTIMIZATION FOR PULP & PAPER WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR MAJOR COST SAVINGS

- 1 - Retrofitting IFAS Systems In Existing Activated Sludge Plants. by Glenn Thesing

Design and operation of a biological integrated system for wastewater of cattle farm treatment and utilization in circulated water fish culture

INDEX LANDFILL LEACHATE TREATMENT BY CONSTRUCTED WETLAND FOCUSING ON ORGANIC MATTER AND NITROGEN REMOVAL Vitor Cano

Reed Bed Treatment Solutions and Forced Bed Aeration

NATIONAL EXPERIENCES

Groundwater Remediation Using Engineered Wetlands

ALTERNATIVE DRY RETENTION POND DESIGN FOR ENHANCED NITROGEN REMOVAL. Evan Shane Williams, Ph.D., P.E.

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

Transcription:

Available online at www.iseec2012.com I-SEEC 2012 Proceeding - Science and Engineering (2013) 591 598 Proceeding Science and Engineering www.iseec2012.com Science and Engineering Symposium 4 th International Science, Social Science, Engineering and Energy Conference 2012 Reduction of Nitrogen by the Difference of Media Depths in the Vertical Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetland C. Sameanram a,*, N. Jungphiboonpan b, R. Rattanakate b, N. Chaiyanate b a Environment Science Program, Faculty of Science, Burapha, University, Chonburi, 20130, Thailand b Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Burapha University, Chonburi, 20130, Thailand Abstract The pilot scale experiment was conducted by comparing the efficiency of nitrogen removal by the difference of media depths in the vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland: (the VSF CW). In the VSF CW, there were 3 layers using 3 different types of media from the bottom layer filled with gravel (3-6 cm in diameter), the middle layer filled with small gravel (1-2 cm in diameter) and at the top layer filled with coarse sand (0.1-0.2 cm in diameter). Three different types of media were arranged in factorial form into 27 treatments with various bed depths of 10, 20 and 30 cm. The results showed that the most effective TKN and NH 3 -N removal were found in 90 cm. of bed depth at 77.35% and 76.46%, respectively. When the hydraulic retention time increases, the efficiency of nitrogen removal also increases. The media depths in the VSF CW, the mount of nitrifying bacteria and denitrifying bacteria were positively related to the efficiency of nitrogen removal. The VSF CW that has media depths of 70, 80 and 90 cm. could remove the total nitrogen in the effluent standards. The findings will be served as a method to select appropriate media in the VSF CW for treating domestic waste water. 2013 The Authors. Published by Kasem Bundit University. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Faculty of Science and Technology, Kasem Bundit University, Bangkok. Keywords: The Vertical Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetland, Synthetic Domestic Wastewater 1. Introduction Constructed wetlands are engineering systems that have been designed to treat wastewater by the natural processes with low operation and maintenance requirements [1]. Due to this fact, they have been widely used to treat many kinds of wastewater such as domestic wastewater, industrial wastewater, tannery wastewater, acid mine drainage and landfill leachate [2-6]. The constructed wetlands are divided into 2 types; surface flow constructed wetland and subsurface flow constructed wetland. The subsurface flow constructed wetland is divided into 2 types which are the horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland (the HF CW), and the vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland (the VSF CW). * Corresponding author. E-mail address: chatkaew_sam@hotmail.com

592 C. Sameanram et al. / Proceeding - Science and Engineering (2013) 591 598 The VSF CW has an efficiency of nitrogen removal because of nitrification, denitrification, biological degradation, sedimentation and filtration. Generally, nitrogen removal in the VSF CW involves nitrification and denitrification processes. The majority of the nitrification and denitrification has been found to occur within the media of the VSF CW [7]. Nitrification is the biological oxidation of ammonia to nitrate in two steps. The first involves ammonia-oxidization bacteria that oxidatize ammonia to nitrite. Then nitrite-oxidizing bacteria oxidize nitrite to nitrate. Denitrification is the conversion of nitrate into nitrogen gas under anoxic conditions by denitrifying bacteria [8]. From previous studies, 3 layers of media are often used [9-12] but there are no studies on the relationship among the difference of media depths in the VSF CW, among the nitrifying bacteria and denitrifying bacteria, and the efficiency of nitrogen removal. The objectives of this study were 1) to study the efficiency of nitrogen removal by the difference of media depths in the VSF CW 2) to study the amount of nitrifying bacteria and denitrifying bacteria with the difference of media depth 3) to study the relationship among the different of media depth in the VSF CW, nitrifying bacteria and denitrifying bacteria, and the efficiency of nitrogen removal. 4) to study the efficiency of nitrogen removal by the difference of hydraulic retention time. 2. Materials and Methods This experiment was conducted at the water purification plant of Laemchabang City Municipality, Sriracha district, Chonburi, Thailand, on January 1 to February 10, 2012. The materials and methods were as follows. 2.1 Description of the VSF CW The VSF CW was constructed from poly vinyl chloride pipes with a diameter of 15.5 cm. Inside the pipes, there were 3 types of media; gravel (3-6 cm. in diameter) at the bottom; small gravel (1-2 cm. in diameter) at the middle layer and at the top layer filled with coarse sand (0.1-0.2 cm. in diameter) as shown in Fig. 1. Three different types of media were arranged in factorial form into 27 treatments with various bed depths of 10, 20 and 30 cm. The experiment had 3 hydraulic retention times (HRT) that were 4, 6 and 8 days as shown in Fig. 2. The VSF CW was arranged using media depths of seven groups as shown in Table 1. Fig. 1. the VSF CW filled with 3 types of media

C. Sameanram et al. / Proceeding - Science and Engineering (2013) 591 598 593

594 C. Sameanram et al. / Proceeding - Science and Engineering (2013) 591 598 Table 1. The VSF CW (T.1-T.27) was arranged into media depths of seven groups Groups Media depths Treatments 1 30 T.1 2 40 T.4, T.6, T.10 3 50 T.2, T.5, T.8, T.13, T.15, T.18 4 60 T.7, T.9, T.11, T.14, T.17, T.22, T.24 5 70 T.3, T.16, T.18, T.20, T.23, T.26 6 80 T.12, T.25, T.27 7 90 T.21 2.2 synthetic domestic wastewater The composition of synthetic domestic wastewater per liter was CH 3 COONH 3 240.88 g KH 2 PO 4 43.94 g, Na 2 HCO 3 125 g, CaCl 2 10 g, FeCl 2 0.375 g, MnSO 4 0.038 g, ZnSO 4 0.035 g, MgSO 4 25.00 g, and yeast extract of 50 g [13]. The synthetic wastewater showed that temperature, ph, suspended solids, chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonia nitrogen(nh 3 -N), nitrite nitrogen (NO 2 - N), nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 -N) and phosphate (PO 4 - ) were 25-27ºC, 7.21 + 0.06, 0.0052 ± 0.0008 mg/l, 213 ± 13.06 mg/l, 131.71 ± 3.39 mg/l, 46.6511±0.4129 mg/l, 35.0844 ± 0.2789 mg/l, 0.0426 ± 0.0061 mg/l, 1.2831 ± 0.0310 mg/l, and 5.47 ± 0.0769 mg/l, respectively. The synthetic domestic wastewater was fed to each treatment and calculated from: Influent of synthetic domestic wastewater (liter) [14] = Volume of space in the media (each treatment) Hydraulic retention time (days) 2.3 experimental methods To begin an experiment, synthetic domestic wastewater was diluted to 10% with tap water, and increased daily by 10% of synthetic domestic wastewater until it reached 100% on day 10. Thereafter, influent and effluent samples were collected every 5 days and analyzed for: temperature, ph, suspended solids, BOD, COD, TKN, NH 3 -N, NO 2 -N, NO 3 -N and PO 4 -, amounts of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, nitrite-oxidizing bacteria, and denitrifying bacteria in influent and effluent wastewater were analyzed at the beginning and end of an experiment [15]. All parameter had 3 replicate. 2.4 Statistical analysis Percentage, means and standard deviation were determined for all parameters for the entire study period. Simple linear regression analysis was applied to investigate factors media depths, nitrifying bacteria and denitrifying bacteria, and the efficiency of nitrogen removal.. 3. Results and Discussion 3.1 Efficiency of nitrogen removal with difference of media depths The average influent nitrogen concentration in the form of NH 4 N and TKN were 35.0844 ± 0.2789 mg/l and 46.6511±0.4129 mg/l. At HRT of 4days, 30cm of media depth (T.1) showed the lowest NH 3 -N and TKN removal efficiency of 51.91% and 53.32%. 40cm of media depth (T.4, T.6 and T.10) NH 3 -N and TKN removal efficiency were (58.52, 60.25%), (58.38, 60.45%) and (60.99, 62.21%), respectively. 50 cm. of media depth (T.2, T.5, T.8, T.13, T.15 and T.19) NH 3 -N and TKN removal efficiency were (62.11, 63.00%), (62.69, 64.44%), (63.56, 63.97%), (64.39, 64.98%) and (64.96, 65.38%), respectively. The highest efficiency of NH 3 -N and TKN

C. Sameanram et al. / Proceeding - Science and Engineering (2013) 591 598 595 removal efficiency was 90 cm. of media depth (T.21) were 76.46 and 77.35%. Treatment performances of the VSF CW were summarized in Fig. 3. From the experiment, we can conclude that efficiency of nitrogen removal is related directly to the media depths. The deeper media depths show higher efficiency of nitrogen removal. This is consistent with the study on the removal of swine wastewater by the VSF CW that have 4 different media depths of 40, 60, 80 and 100 cm., which was found that when increasing the depth of the media in the VSF CW, the efficiency in swine wastewater was also increased [16]. A B C Fig. 3. Efficiency of NH 3-N and TKN removal in the treatments with 3 HRT: A = HRT of 4 days, B = HRT of 6 days, C = HRT of 8 days., were NH 3 N and TKN Removal (%), respectively and 30 cm,40 cm, 50 cm, 60 cm, 70 cm, 80 cm and 90 cm were bed depth.

596 C. Sameanram et al. / Proceeding - Science and Engineering (2013) 591 598 3.2 amount of nitrifying bacteria and denitrifying bacteria with media depths The average of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, nitrite-oxidizing bacteria, and denitrifying bacteria with 3 HRT at the beginning of experiment were 3.17x10 3 + 803 CFU, 2.65x10 3 + 573 CFU and 1.83x10 3 + 258 CFU, respectively. At the end of experiment, the result showed that the HRT of 4days, 30 cm. of media depth (T.1) showed the lowest amount of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, nitrite-oxidizing bacteria, and A B C Fig. 4. The amount of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, nitrite-oxidizing bacteria and denitrifying bacteria with 3 HRT: A = HRT of 4 days, B = HRT of 6 days, C = HRT of 8 days and 30 cm,40 cm, 50 cm, 60 cm, 70 cm, 80 cm and 90 cm were bed depths., were ammonia-oxidizing bacteria at the first day and the last day., were nitrite-oxidizing bacteria at the first day and the last day., were ammonia-oxidizing bacteria at the first day and the last day.

C. Sameanram et al. / Proceeding - Science and Engineering (2013) 591 598 597 denitrifying bacteria were 1.26x10 4 + 289 CFU, 9.66x10 4 + 577 CFU and 5.33 x10 4 + 577 CFU, respectively. 40 cm. of media depth (T.4, T.6 and T.10) showed the amount of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, nitrite-oxidizing bacteria and denitrifying bacteria were (1.36x10 4 + 577 CFU, 1.23x10 4 + 577 CFU and 7.33 x10 3 + 1154 CFU), (1.48x10 4 + 289 CFU, 1.16x10 4 + 577 CFU and 7.66 x10 4 + 577 CFU), (1.43x10 4 + 577 CFU, 1.23x10 4 + 577 CFU and 7.33 x10 4 + 577 CFU), respectively. The highest amount of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, nitrite-oxidizing bacteria and denitrifying bacteria was 90 cm., and the media depth (T.21) were 2.83x10 4 + 577 CFU, 2.23x10 4 + 543CFU and 1.82 x10 4 +104 CFU, respectively. The amount of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, nitrite-oxidizing bacteria and denitrifying bacteria were summarized in Fig. 4 The results showed that ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, nitrite-oxidizing bacteria and denitrifying bacteria related directly with media depths. The deeper media depths show higher amount of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, nitrite-oxidizing bacteria and denitrifying bacteria. Some references recommend that nitrifying bacteria and denitrifying bacteria increased because the appropriate conditions for nitrifying and denitrifying bacterial growth such as 25-35 C of temperature, 7.0-8.6 of ph, oxygen demand >1 mg/l for nitrification[17-20]. For this experiment, the conditions were 25-33 C of temperature, 7.0-80 of ph, oxygen demand of influent (synthetic domestic wastewater) >1 mg/l was in rang of the nitrifying bacteria and denitrifying bacteria growth. 3.3 relationships among the difference of media depth in the VSF CW, nitrifying bacteria and denitrifying bacteria, and efficiency of nitrogen removal The media depth has an important role in the VSF CW of nitrogen removal. The deeper media depths promote more surface area available where nitrifying bacteria and denitrifying bacteria attach themselves to the surfaces [21]. When nitrogen becomes trapped in the pores of the media, chemical treatment also takes place as a reaction in the media. From the data, media depths, nitrifying bacteria and denitrifying bacteria were positively related to the efficiency of nitrogen removal (p < 0.05). 3.4 efficiency of nitrogen removal at the difference of hydraulic retention time When the hydraulic retention time increases, the efficiency of nitrogen removal was increased. For example, at hydraulic retention time of 4 Days, T.21 has the efficiency of TKN removal of 73.38%, and at hydraulic retention time of 6 Days and 8 days, the efficiency of TKN removal increases to 76.25 and 77.35%, respectively. The increasing of hydraulic retention time helps increasing the time and completing of the nitrification and denitrification, hydraulic retention time, which also plays a critical role in nitrogen removal efficiency. Nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands requires a long HRT. Accordingly, the VSF CW with HRT of 8 days is required being recommended as optimal [22]. 4. Conclusions The VSF CW with 90 cm. of bed depth showed the most effective TKN and NH 3 -N removal at 77.35% and 76.46%, respectively. When the hydraulic retention time increases, the efficiency of nitrogen removal increases. The media depths in the VSF CW, the mount of nitrifying bacteria and denitrifying bacteria were positively related to the efficiency of nitrogen removal. The VSF CW that has media depths of 70, 80 and 90 cm. (T.3, T.16, T.18, T.20, T.23, T.26, T.12, T.25, T.27 and T.21) can remove total nitrogen in the effluent standards [23].

598 C. Sameanram et al. / Proceeding - Science and Engineering (2013) 591 598 Acknowledgements This study was financially supported by the Science and Technology Postgraduate Education and Research Development Office (PERDO). Special thanks for Laemchabang city municipality and the Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Burapha University that provides the place, tools, equipments and recommendation in the analysis of waste water quality and bacterial. References [1] Vymazal J. Constructed wetlands for wastewater Treatment. Water 2010;2:530-549. [2] Konnerup D, Koottatep T, Brixa H. Treatment of domestic wastewater in tropical subsurface flow constructed wetlands planted with Canna and Heliconia. Ecological engineering 2009;35: 248-257. [3] Khan S, Ahmad IB, Shah MT, Rehman S, Khaliq A. Use of constructed wetland for the removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management 2009;90:3451-3457. [4] Cristina SC, Anto nio O.S.S. Rangel, Paula ML. Constructed wetland systems vegetated with different plants applied to the treatment of tannery wastewater. Water research 2007;41:1790-1798. [5] Sheoran AS, Sheoran V. Heavy metal removal mechanism of acid mine drainage in wetlands: A critical review. Minerals Engineering 2006;19:105-116. [6] Kadleca RH, Zmarthieb LA. Wetland treatment of leachate from a closed landfill. Ecological Engineering 2010; 36:946-957. [7] Prempramamon S. Nitrogen removal using different plant in vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland system. Master of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University; 2006. [8] Vymazal J. Nutrient removal in gravel- and soil-based wetland microcosms with and without vegetation. Ecological Engineering 2001;18:91 105. [9] Fongpetch P. The efficiency of the canna for domestic wastewater treatment using the constructed swamp subsurface system. Environmental management 2010; 5(2): 89-99. [10] Angkasin S. Domestic wastewater treatment by subsurface constructed wetlands comblind with evapotranspiration systems. Thai Environmental Engineering 2005; 21:51-60. [11] Junsod J. Solid waste landfill lechate treatment by subsurface flow constructed wetland. Master of Environmental Engineering, Department of Environmental engineering, Kasetsart University; 2006. [12] Saraveg P. Effects of hydraulic loading rate on the treatment of domestic wastewater by constructed wetland utilizing passive aeration mechanism. Master of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chaing Mai University; 2005. [13] Yoo H, Ahn K, Lee H, Lee K, Kwak Y, Song K. Nitrogen removal from synthetic wastewater by simultaneous nitrification and denitri-fication (SND)via nitrite in an intermittently aerated reactor. Water resource 1999;3:145. 154. [14] Kerdsup W. Use of subsurface-flow constructed wetlands for landfill leachate tertiary treatment. Master of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University2000; [15] APHA, AWWA,WPCF. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater (20 th edition).wasnington D.C. American Public Health Associate Inc 1995; [16] Surakup V. Effects of bed depth on nitrogen removal in a vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland system. Master of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of engineering, Chiang Mai Universit 2011; [17] Truu M, Juhanson J, Truu J. Microbial biomass activity and community composition in constructed wetlands. Science of the total environment 2009; 407 : 3958 3971. [18] Dennis P, Thomas M. How to start a biofilter. Center SRAC Publication February 2012;4502. [19] Lee C, Fletcher TD, Sun G. Nitrogen removal in constructed wetland systems. Eng. Life Sci 2009;9:11-22. [20] Amatyal IM, Kansakar BR, Tare V, Fiksdal L. Role of ph on biological Nitrification Process. Journal of the Institute of Engineering; 8,119-125. [21] Kadlec RH, Knight RL. Treatment of Wetlands. New York : Lewis Publishers;1995. [22] Yalcuk A, Ugurlu A. Comparison of horizontal and vertical constructed wetland systems for landfill leachate treatment. Bioresource Technology 2009;100: 2521-2526. [23] The Ministry of Natural Resource and Environment of the Kingdom of Thailand. Effluent standards of domestic waste water treatment plant;2011.