ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Similar documents
Zoning Permits 11-1 ZONING PERMITS

Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

a. Structures subject to section Architectural & Site Design Standards must comply with the following additional fencing standards:

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 2

CHAPTER 13 R-5 MANUFACTURED MOBILE HOME PARK RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

CITY OF CEDAR FALLS DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INSPECTION SERVICES DIVISION PHONE Residential Accessory Structures

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA Napa (707)

Neighborhood Traditional Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

5 February 12, 2014 Public Hearing APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER: ERIK HOMES, L.L.C.

BLOCK, LOT ; Section Requirement Status of Permit Review Status of C.O. Review The first 6 items are relevant to the principal building (house):

INTENT OBJECTIVES HISTORIC DESIGNATIONS

Summary of Regulations and Permits for Fences and Walls

Fence and Wall Requirements

HAROLD L. MOSELEY SUBDIVISION, RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 2

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING APPROVAL & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: June 4, 2015

ARTICLE 5 RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTURED HOME DISTRICT. Description and Purpose CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF BRIGHTON ZONING ORDINANCE

Corridor Residential Traditional District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

ARTICLE VIII. (SF-A, SF-TH) SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

Holdener Farm Area P.U.D. Enumclaw,Washington DESIGN STANDARDS PHASE ONE

CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPT

Staff Report. Application: A Application #: A Parcel number:

# 7 ) UN MY PLACE HOTEL SPECIAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING

CHAPTER 5: RESIDENTIAL USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

ARTICLE VI - RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R-1. be for one or more of the following uses:

# Mercyhealth Hospital Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission

Public Hearing January 13, Request Conditional Use Permit (Auto Repair Garage) Staff Planner Carolyn A.K. Smith

Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 11, 2013

APPLICATION FOR PORCH / DECK PERMIT

Date Application Deemed Complete June 19, 2017 Date Extension Letter Sent Not applicable

ORDINANCE NO. _5063. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Cruz ordains as follows: SECTION I

WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS APPLICATION

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD. 1. New construction or relocation of single-family homes, including mobile/modular and manufactured homes.

A D M I N I S T R A T I V E U S E P E R M I T

A. Applicability and Review Authority.

Residential Uses in the Historic Village Core

ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR SINGLE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS HAVING THREE OR FOUR DWELLING UNITS

SECTION 5 EXCEPTIONS AND MODIFICATIONS

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEMS: K, L STAFF: SHARON ROBINSON FILE NOS: CPC CU QUASI-JUDICIAL CPC NV QUASI-JUDICIAL

Department of Planning Services Division of Planning Phone: 302/ FAX: 302/

Request Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Repair Garage) Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STAFF REPORT

Residential Design Standards Draft 9 August 2013

THERFORE, the Board of Supervisors hereby adopts the following amendments to the Zoning Ordinance by adding the following:

NEIGHBORHOOD EMPOWERMENT ZONE (NEZ) IMPACT FEE WAIVER CHECKLIST

Corridor Residential Traditional District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Definitions. The following words and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the following meanings respectively ascribed to them:

Wheaton PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS

SIGNS (OR )

Zoning Code and Design Guidelines. Department of Community Development. October 7, Tricia Stevens #46. Planning and Environmental Review

Garage Construction. Permit Guide. Development Center. General Information. Zoning Ordinance Requirements. Building Code Requirements

MEETING DATE: ADOPTED ON EARTH DAY: APRIL 22, 2008 AGENDA ITEM COMMENTARY

# 17 ) UN DESERT GREEN FARMS SPECIAL USE PERMIT EXTENSION OF TIME PUBLIC HEARING

TOWN OF PALM BEACH Town Manager s Office

r e s i d e n t i a l o u t s i d e v i l l a g e c e n t e r

Certificate of Appropriateness Review Packet

SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS APPLICATION

CASE NUMBER: 17SN0500 APPLICANTS: Marjorie S. Elliott and Michael B. Elliott

B-2 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. Uses allowed in the B-2 Community Commercial Business District are subject to the following conditions:

Administrative Hearing Staff Report

CITY OF WINTER PARK SETBACK/COVERAGE WORKSHEET GUIDE FOR SINGLE FAMILY ZONING

TOWN OF ROTTERDAM RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Ext. 395 Needed to Obtain Permit:

ZONING RESOLUTION OF KNOX COUNTY APPENDIX C SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM ORDINANCE

PUBLIC NOTICE CITY OF BEXLEY BOARD OF ZONING AND PLANNING

l Setback 00_ Overview ~/ Rightofj Why regulate signs? When is a temporary sign permitted? How many signs can I have and where can I put them?

ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW (ADR) An applicant s guide to the process

LDR RESIDENTIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs) CODE UPDATE D.R.C. June 7, 2017

ARTICLE 987. PD 987. PD 987 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on June 14, (Ord.

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

PART R3-L ZONE, LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE DWELLING DISTRICT

Submittal Requirements for Administrative Design Review of Signage

Title 15 BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION

CPED STAFF REPORT Prepared for the City Planning Commission CPC Agenda Item #XX September 18, 2017 ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT

SECTION 832 "C-P" - ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT

Baseline Hillside Ordinance Correction Sheet (Ordinance No. 184,802 Effective 3/17/17)

The requirements set forth in this Section shall govern the construction and/or installation of all Renewable Energy Systems:

ARTICLE 38: AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND VENTILATION REQUIREMENT FOR URBAN INFILL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS

CITY OF BERKLEY, MICHIGAN FENCE APPLICATION

Request. Staff Recommendation. Options. Planning Division Department of Community and Economic Development

BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION

# 5 ) UN THREE CUPS YARD NORTH AMERICA CULTIVATION FACILITY SPECIAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING

The Chair, Mr. William Kendell, presided and the Clerk, Ms. Cathy Blum, recorded.

Article 16 Accessory Buildings, Structures and Uses

ARTICLE 4 SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS

MINUTES BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA NOVEMBER 1, 2017

Legacy Existing Homes Design Guidelines and Submittal Requirements

HISTORIC DISTRICT BOARD OF REVIEW SAVANNAH HISTORIC DISTRICT Instructions for Certificate of Appropriateness Application

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Waukee:

FENCES. This hand out is for REFERENCE ONLY. For more details see specific code sections.

Administrative Hearing Staff Report. CLEARWIRE XEROX BUILDING CONDITIONAL USE PLNPCM East 500 South Hearing date: November 12, 2009

Larchmont Zoning Code: DRAFT Revisions, with Recommended Changes from the Planning Commission April 15, 2003

THREE CHARACTER AREAS 812

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. 7.C STAFF REPORT March 15, 2016 LEISURE TOWN SELF-STORAGE & RV STORAGE


Franklin County Communique to the Planning Board

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND, SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL ORDER OF REMAND

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. June 17, 2014

Transcription:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Board of Zoning Appeals Agenda Item V-11331-17-UP-1: Meeting of April 25, 2018 DATE: April 20, 2018 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: LOT AREA: GLUP DESIGNATION: Silvester Godolja & Elda Godolja 1 North Fenwick Street R-6, One-Family Dwelling District 11,729 Square Feet Low 1-10 units per acre SUBJECT: Use Permit request by Silvester Godolja & Elda Godolja, Owners to allow a setback of 5 feet to the wall of a detached accessory building (4 feet to the eaves) instead of 25 feet to the wall (21 feet to the eave) from both the Arlington Boulevard right-of-way and the North Fillmore Street right-of-way, and to permit a structure between 3 feet and 10 feet high within the triangle for vison clearance at the corner of the lot. re new one-story detached accessory building on a lot with three right-of-way frontages, "R-6" Zoning District, premise known as 1 North Fenwick Street (Lyon Park) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached Proposed Resolution denying the Use Permit request. Two additional proposed resolutions have been provided if the BZA should decide to approve the request. ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS: For all one- and two-family dwellings and their accessory structures, No structure shall be located less than 25 feet from any street right-of-way line (Article 3, Section 3.2.6 A.1.(e). Residential setbacks for irregular lots. (Zoning handout) Staff: Stephen Risse, Board of Zoning Appeals Coordinator V-11331-17-UP-1

EXISTING CONDITIONS: The subject property is an approximately 88.8-foot-wide lot with adjacent rights-of-way on three sides, containing 11,729 square feet of land area. The lot is Zoned R-6, One-Family Dwelling District. The R-6 zoning district permits One-family dwellings on lots that are a minimum of 60 feet wide and contain at least 6,000 square feet of land area. The General Land Use Plan is Residential Low 1-10 units per acre. County records indicate that the existing single family dwelling was constructed in 1953. The existing dwelling is located 40.2 feet from the North Fenwick Street right-of-way, 40.9 feet from the Arlington Boulevard right-of-way and 30.3 feet from the North Fillmore Street right-of-way, and 7.8 feet from the adjacent property line. PREVIOUS BZA ACTIONS: V-6410-88-: In January 1989, the Board of Zoning Appeals granted a variance to permit a setback of 46 feet from the centerline of North Fillmore Street instead of 50 feet as required, regarding the addition of a storage shed to the side of the dwelling. V-11331-17-VA-1: In December 2017, the Board of Zoning Appeals denied a Variance request to permit a main building footprint of 3,212 square feet instead of 2,520 square feet as required, re new front and side addition and new second story over existing first story walls. V-11331-17-UP-1: In December 2017, The Board of Zoning Appeals deferred a Use Permit request to allow a setback of 8.5 feet to the wall of a sunroom addition instead of 10 feet as required, and to permit a setback of 5.84 feet to the eaves of a new 2 nd story addition, instead of 6 feet as required, re new front and side addition and new second story over existing first story walls on a lot with three right-of-way frontages. PROPOSED CHANGES: The applicants are proposing to construct a 484 square foot (22 ft. x 22 ft.) one story detached accessory building (garage) on their property. The walls of the proposed garage will be located 5 feet from the North Fillmore Street right-of-way and 5 feet from the Arlington Boulevard right-of-way. It is worth noting that because of the placement of the existing trail within the 200-foot-wide Arlington Boulevard right-of-way, the garage which will be located behind the jogging trail may not be a hindrance to the vehicular or pedestrian visibility at the intersection of N Fenwick Street and Arlington Boulevard despite technically being located within 5 feet of both rights-of-way. STAFF ANALYSIS: 1. Would the proposal promote compatibility of development with the surrounding neighborhood because the overall footprint size and placement are similar to the structures on the properties surrounding the subject property and would the proposal help preserve natural land form, historical features and/or significant trees and foliage? The proposed detached accessory building may be compatible with the surrounding area, because the proposed footprint of 484 square feet would be larger than the footprints of some existing accessory buildings on surrounding properties, and smaller than the footprints of accessory buildings on other surrounding properties. See the table below for a sampling of some of the footprints of other detached accessory buildings in the surrounding area. - 2 -

Address Detached accessory building Lot Location footprint 200 N. Fillmore Street 294.84 square feet Corner 22 S. Fillmore Street 408 square feet Interior 133 N. Fillmore Street 455.89 square feet Corner 209 N. Fillmore Street 498.48 square feet Interior 38 N. Fenwick Street 529.92 square feet Interior 2813 2 nd Street South 720 square feet Corner However, the proposed placement of the detached accessory building in regards to the adjacent right-of-way lines may not be compatible with the placement of other structures in the surrounding area. Many structures on both North and South Fillmore Streets have right-of-way setbacks reduced below the requirements set forth in the current Zoning Ordinance. (See table below). However, staff was unable to certify any setbacks equal to or less than the setback of 5 feet currently requested by the applicants. Address Right-of-way Setback Distance From Lot Location 22 S. Fillmore Street S. Fillmore St 6.5 feet House Interior 400 S. Fillmore Street S. Fillmore St Apx. 7 feet Shed Interior 2813 2 nd St. South S. Fillmore St. 10.3 feet Porch Corner 206 N. Fillmore Street N. Fillmore St. 14 feet House Interior 210 N. Fillmore Street N. Fillmore St. Apx. 14 feet House Interior 200 N. Fillmore Street N. Fillmore St. 14 feet Porch Corner 105 S. Fillmore Street S. Fillmore St. 14.5 feet House Interior It should be noted that there are additional addresses for which staff was unable to obtain a plat and certify reduced setbacks along S. Fillmore Street. In particular, based off of GIS observation, the dwellings at 2, 10, and 113 S Fillmore street all appear to have setbacks that may be comparable to the setbacks requested by the applicants for their detached accessory building. - 3 -

Additionally, based off of Google street-view photos, there appears to be more than one detached accessory structure located at 17 S Fenwick Street. At that address, the closest detached accessory structure may have a setback comparable to the requested 5-foot setback that the applicants are seeking for their garage. Lastly, the proposed detached accessory building will be located in proximity to some trees that the applicants have stated they believe are planted in the Arlington Boulevard rightof-way. These trees are not located on the applicant s plat, so it is not possible to tell exactly how close the proposed garage will be built to the existing trees, or on which side of the property line the tree are located. None of the trees are included in the list of Arlington County s champion trees, nor the list of Arlington County s significant trees. Four of the eight trees on-site are listed as Arlington County street trees; however, those trees are all shown across the trail, closer to Arlington Boulevard. 2. Would the proposal adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing in the neighborhood? Given that the proposed garage will be built behind existing vegetation along N. Fillmore Street, and behind the trees and running trail adjacent to Arlington Boulevard, this proposal seems to have little (if any) adverse effect on the health or safety of persons residing in the neighborhood. 3. Would the proposal be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood? - 4 -

The proposal would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood. 4. Would the proposal be in conflict with the purposes of the master plans and land use and zoning related policies of the County? The property is zoned R-6, for single family residences. The GLUP designation is Low 1-10 units per acre. The property is improved with a single family dwelling which is permitted by the Zoning Ordinance and is in accordance with the GLUP. The proposal is therefore not in conflict with the purposes of the master plans and the land use and zoning related policies of the County. COMMENTS FROM NEIGHBORS: As of the writing of this report, Staff has received one letter signed by three of the adjacent neighbors supporting the applicant s proposal. CONCLUSION: The proposal may not promote compatibility of development with the surrounding neighborhood because staff found no evidence of any other structures along North and South Fillmore Street equal to or less than the 5 that the applicants are requesting. Therefore, staff recommends that the Board of Zoning Appeals adopt the Proposed Resolution denying the Use Permit. Two Alternative Proposed Resolutions have been provided should the Board decide to approve the application. The first proposed alternative resolution is to approve the accessory building with a setback of 6.5 feet from N. Fillmore Street, which was the closest setback staff was able to find along Fillmore Street. The second alternative proposed resolution is for approval of the Use Permit request as advertised. MOTION: I move that the Board of Zoning Appeals adopt the attached Proposed Resolution denying the Use Permit V-11331-17-UP-1. PROPOSED RESOLUTION (Denial) WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals ( BZA ) has held a duly advertised public hearing on April 25th, 2018 on case number V-11331-17-UP-1 for a Special Use Permit to allow a setback of 5 feet to the wall of a detached accessory building (4 feet to the eaves) instead of 25 feet to the wall (21 feet to the eave) from both the Arlington Boulevard right-of-way and the North Fillmore Street right-of-way, and to permit a structure between 3 feet and 10 feet high within the triangle for vison clearance at the corner of the lot. re new one-story detached accessory building on a lot with three right-of-way frontages, "R-6" Zoning District, premise known as 1 North Fenwick Street; and, WHEREAS, the BZA finds that the proposal will not affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing in the neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, the BZA finds that the proposal will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood; and, - 5 -

WHEREAS, the BZA finds that the proposal will not be in conflict with the purposes of the master plans and land use and zoning policies of the County; and, WHEREAS, the BZA has determined that the modification is not compatible with development in the surrounding neighborhood and that the structure s overall footprint size and placement are not similar to comparable structures on other properties in the County and the proposal would help preserve natural land form, historical features and/or significant trees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the BZA hereby denies Special Use Permit case number V-11331-17-UP-1. ALTERNATIVE PROPOSED RESOLUTION 1 (approval with setback of 6.5 feet from N. Fillmore Street) WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals ( BZA ) has held a duly advertised public hearing on April 25, 2018 on case number V-11331-17-UP-1 for a Special Use to allow a setback of 5 feet to the wall of a detached accessory building (4 feet to the eaves) instead of 25 feet to the wall (21 feet to the eave) from both the Arlington Boulevard right-of-way and the North Fillmore Street right-of-way, and to permit a structure between 3 feet and 10 feet high within the triangle for vison clearance at the corner of the lot. re new one-story detached accessory building on a lot with three right-of-way frontages, "R-6" Zoning District, premise known as 1 North Fenwick Street; and, WHEREAS, the BZA finds that the proposal will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing in the neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, the BZA finds that the proposal will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, the BZA finds that the proposal will not be in conflict with the purposes of the master plans and land use and zoning policies of the County; and, WHEREAS, the BZA has determined that the modification is compatible with development in the surrounding neighborhood and that the structure s overall footprint size and placement are similar to comparable structures on other properties in the County and the proposal would help preserve natural land form, historical features and/or significant trees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the BZA hereby approves Special Use Permit case number V-11331-17-UP-1, subject to the following: 1. The applicants agree that the structure/addition shall be constructed in accordance with the footprint shown on the survey, and the architectural drawings attached to the staff report dated April 20, 2018, except that the building shall be located no closer than 6.5 feet from the N. Fillmore street right-of-way, with an eave 5.5 feet from the N. Fillmore Street right- - 6 -

of-way, and that no enlargement of the structure/addition may be made in any dimension shown on the plat or architectural drawings. 2. The applicants shall obtain and provide to the Zoning Administrator one or more plats, which may include a wall check plat when the foundation is constructed and a final plat at the completion of the project, unless determined by the Zoning Administrator that such plats shall not be required. 3. The applicants shall obtain a building permit to construct the structure permitted herein by April 25, 2019 or the Use Permit shall be null and void. ALTERNATIVE PROPOSED RESOLUTION 2 (approval as advertised) WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals ( BZA ) has held a duly advertised public hearing on April 25, 2018 on case number V-11331-17-UP-1 for a Special Use Permit to allow a setback of 5 feet to the wall of a detached accessory building (4 feet to the eaves) instead of 25 feet to the wall (21 feet to the eave) from both the Arlington Boulevard right-of-way and the North Fillmore Street right-of-way, and to permit a structure between 3 feet and 10 feet high within the triangle for vison clearance at the corner of the lot. re new one-story detached accessory building on a lot with three right-of-way frontages, "R-6" Zoning District, premise known as 1 North Fenwick Street; and, WHEREAS, the BZA finds that the proposal will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing in the neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, the BZA finds that the proposal will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, the BZA finds that the proposal will not be in conflict with the purposes of the master plans and land use and zoning policies of the County; and, WHEREAS, the BZA has determined that the modification is compatible with development in the surrounding neighborhood and that the structure s overall footprint size and placement are similar to comparable structures on other properties in the County and the proposal would help preserve natural land form, historical features and/or significant trees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the BZA hereby approves Special Use Permit case number V-11331-17-UP-1, subject to the following: 1. The applicants agree that the structure/addition shall be constructed in accordance with the footprint shown on the survey, and the architectural drawings attached to the staff report dated April 20, 2018 and that no enlargement of the structure/addition may be made in any dimension shown on the plat or architectural drawings. - 7 -

2. The applicants shall obtain and provide to the Zoning Administrator one or more plats, which may include a wall check plat when the foundation is constructed and a final plat at the completion of the project, unless determined by the Zoning Administrator that such plats shall not be required. 3. The applicants shall obtain a building permit to construct the structure permitted herein by April 25, 2019 or the Use Permit shall be null and void. - 8 -

V-11331-17-UP-1 1 North Fenwick St. 18081001 Case Location(s) Scale: 1: 1,200.00 Note: These maps are for property location assistance only. They may not represent the latest survey and other information. Department of Community Planning, Housing and Development County Use Only Date Placard Posted By Removed