Sectoral Climate Policies Exploring Multiple Sectoral Climate Policies to Achieve Economy Wide GHG Reductions JONATHAN BANKS FALL, 2009

Similar documents
EMISSION REDUCTIONS UNDER THE AMERICAN CLEAN ENERGY AND SECURITY ACT OF 2009

U.S. Carbon Dioxide Emissions in 2009: A Retrospective Review

Byron S. Wright Vice President, Corporate Development

EIA s Energy Outlook Through 2035

Why Copenhagen Still Matters:

A Clean Energy Bargain: Analysis of The American Clean Energy And Security Act

Annual Energy Outlook 2010 Reference Case

Understanding the Scale of the Problem: US Energy Sources and CO2 Emissions

2016 Annual Greenhouse Gas Impact Report Infrastructure Credit, Alliance I & II Funds

Fuels Used in Electricity Generation

Power Sector Transition: GHG Policy and Other Key Drivers

The Outlook for Energy:

Natural Gas Solutions: Power Generation

Agriculture and Carbon Offsets Policy

An Estimate of the Economic Impact of. A Cap-and-Trade Auction Tax. On California

Greenhouse Gas Emission Factors Info Sheet

Carbon Footprint Study

Highlights and Key Results

The Outlook for Energy: A View to 2040

05/23/14. Power Sector Transition: GHG Policy and Other Key Drivers

International Offsets: The potential role of the energy sector

Transforming America s Power Industry:

Decarbonization: Energy Policy Planning in California and Its Implications for the Northeast

Energy Economics. Overview of EMF 22 U.S. transition scenarios

Overview of U.S. and European Climate Change Programs. Reid Harvey, U.S. EPA Presented at LSU Energy Summit October 24, 2007

Pacific Northwest Low Carbon Scenario Analysis

Annual Energy Outlook 2018 with projections to 2050

Russell Senate Office Building 253 September 1, 2009

Alaska Fuel Price Projections

Opportunities for Landowners in the California Carbon Market

EA July 11, 2017

Overview of Alberta s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program

Alternative Fuels. August 23, EPA s Office of Transportation and Air Quality

General Session. Four Decades of Pursuing a Diversified Energy Portfolio at MIKE KOTARA. Senior Vice President

Dynamic Coalition on Internet and Climate Change. ICT as a Tool to combat Global Warming

Annual Energy Outlook 2003

2015 Economic Planning Study Assumptions

EIA Short-Term Energy and

Powering California Forward

Renewable Natural Gas : Part of our Sustainable Energy Future

Domestic and International Forestry: Implications for the Carbon Market

Emission Performance Standards: Global Practice and Options for Europe

Natural Gas Demand Abstract which should not be con- sidered a projection, 253

Roundtable 2: Energy Efficiency and Demand Management. John Jimison, Energy Future Coalition Alexandra Langenheld, Agora Energiewende Co-Chairs

Potential Impacts of a Renewable and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard in Kentucky

Managing Climate Change with Adaptation and Mitigation

Overview. Key Energy Issues to Economic Growth

Natural Gas Pipeline and Storage Infrastructure Projections Through 2030

Energy and Climate Change, A Washington Perspective

NRDC Legislative Facts

Contract For Biomass-Fueled Generation. Presentation to the Gainesville City Commission May 7, 2009

The Interaction of Complementary Measures and the Cap & Trade Program under in AB32

Hawai i Greenhouse Gas Profile 1990 to 2005

Executive Summary. 1 APP CHP in China project team includes WADE, ICF International, EXERGY Partners, and Solar Turbines

Climate Change and Renewable Energy: The Technology Challenges and Opportunities. National Renewable Energy Laboratory What Makes Us Unique?

Pragmatic Policy Options for Copenhagen and Beyond

MTEP18 Futures. Planning Advisory Committee June 14, 2017

The Outlook for Energy

california CCS coalition Created to represent CCS industry to ensure CCS is part of state s carbon stabilization program. Bring voices to the table th

International Energy Outlook: key findings in the 216 Reference case World energy consumption increases from 549 quadrillion Btu in 212 to 629 quadril

Colorado s Commitment to Energy Efficiency the First Fuel

Modeling Report for the Draft Energy Master Plan

The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative: Lessons Learned and Issues for Congress

Climate Change Legislation in the 110 th Congress

Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sources Amy Banister, Sr. Dir. Air Programs

Short Term Energy Outlook March 2011 March 8, 2011 Release

How Much Does CCS Really Cost?

Fossil Fuel Consumption: United States and China

ZERO GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS

Climate Change: Implications from Macroeconomic Models for India April 14, Macro Workstream ICRIER, April 14 th, 2014

Appendix 3.C Electricity Generation Economics: Bases and Assumptions

Alberta s Climate Change Strategy and Regulations

The Impact of Increased Use of Hydrogen on Petroleum Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions

Generation Technology Options in a Carbon- Constrained World

PJM Perspective of the EPA Clean Power Plan: Analysis

Energy and Climate Change: A Washington Perspective

Energy Efficiency Action Plan

What Do Students & Households Think About Global Warming Issues?

Climate Change and Renewable Energy

The Commission's Energy Roadmap 2050

Cost-Benefit Analysis of the PSE&G Energy Efficiency Program 2014 Prospective

Gas-Electric Coordination: Pipeline Infrastructure

CHP Savings and Avoided Emissions in Portfolio Standards

The Economic Benefits of Investing in Clean Energy

2014 ENVIRONMENTAL SEMINAR

U.S. EIA s Liquid Fuels Outlook

Impact of Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and Renewable Portfolio Standards on Power System Planning

The Next 100 Years of Global Energy: Part I Energy Security and Energy Poverty*

Evaluations on the emission reduction efforts of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) in cost metrics

Illinois Energy Policy

L.D. Carter For USCSC

FutureMetrics LLC 8 Airport Road Bethel, ME 04217, USA

Completing a Municipal Carbon Footprint requires an accounting-like inventory of all the sources of GHG in your buildings, fleet, and operations.

Fundamentals of Policy. Matt Clouse U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Renewable Energy Markets Conference September 16, 2009

Summer Fuels Outlook. Gasoline and diesel. April 2018

Deep Decarbonization Pathway Case: Indonesia Energy Sector

APPROACHES FOR USING SCENARIOS IN STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING

Kyoto Protocol and Beyond: The Economic Cost to Spain

Renewable Portfolio Standards

Generation Technology Assessment & Production Cost Analysis

Transcription:

Sectoral Climate Policies Exploring Multiple Sectoral Climate Policies to Achieve Economy Wide GHG Reductions JONATHAN BANKS FALL, 2009

Purpose In late 2008, following the defeat of the Lieberman Warner bill, CATF decided to test some alternatives to economy wide climate legislation. We chose to analyze a combination of policies that target specific sectors, with the goal of reducing costs, creating more believable technology pathways, and maintaining environmental integrity. CATF conducted an initial set of modeling runs on a set of proxy policies. Since then, the economic downturn, and a number of additional changes have dramatically altered EIA s view of BAU. CATF has now updated our initial set of runs to reflect these changes and pegged the work to modeling EIA has performed on the Waxman-Markey legislation. The modeling conducted serves to test a variety of policy options but needs further refinement, development and discussion to achieve the necessary goals. For a more in depth discussion please see CATF s testimony before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Sectoral Climate Policies 2

4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 Purchased Offsets Other GHG Reductions Power Sector CO2 Transportation CO2 Industrial CO2 Commercial CO2 Residential CO2 Shares of GHG Abatement Under Waxman-Markey (EIA) MMTCO2e 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Sectoral Climate Policies 3

Purchased Offsets 2,000 1,800 1,600 CATF Waxman-Markey/Sectoral 1,400 1,200 MMTCO2e 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 Sectoral Climate Policies 4

80% Purchased Offsets as a Fraction of Total Greenhouse Gas Reductions from the Reference Case Offsets as a Percentage of Total GHG Reduction 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% CATF Waxman-Markey/ Sectoral 0% Sectoral Climate Policies 5

Greenhouse Gas Allowance Prices $70.00 $60.00 2006 Dollars per MTCO2e $50.00 $40.00 $30.00 $20.00 CATF Waxman-Markey/ Sectoral $10.00 $0.00 Sectoral Climate Policies 6

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Less Offsets 9,000 8,000 7,000 Millions of Metric Tonnes CO2e 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 CATF Waxman-Markey/Sectoral 0 Sectoral Climate Policies 7

Total Energy Consumption 120.00 100.00 Quadrillion BTUs 80.00 60.00 40.00 20.00 CATF Waxman-Markey/Sectoral 0.00 Sectoral Climate Policies 8

Power Sector CO2 Emissions 3,000 2,500 Millions of Metric Tonnes of CO2 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Sectoral Climate Policies 9

2,050 Transportation CO2 Emissions (not including electricity) 2,000 Millions of Metric Tonnes of CO2 1,950 1,900 1,850 1,800 1,750 CATF Waxman-Markey/Sectoral Sectoral Climate Policies 10

1,050 Industrial Sector CO2 Emissions (not including electricity) 1,000 Millions of Metric Tonnes of CO2 950 900 850 800 750 Sectoral Climate Policies 11

Residential Electricity Prices $0.16 $0.14 Residential Electric Price ($/kwh) $0.12 $0.10 $0.08 $0.06 $0.04 $0.02 $0.00 Sectoral Climate Policies 12

Residential Monthly Electric Bills $140 $120 Residential Monthly Electric Bills $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 Sectoral Climate Policies 13

Residential Natural Gas Prices $18.00 $16.00 $14.00 Residential Gas Price ($/MMBTU) $12.00 $10.00 $8.00 $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 $0.00 Sectoral Climate Policies 14

Residential Monthly Natural Gas Bills $60 $50 Residential Monthly Gas Bills $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 Sectoral Climate Policies 15

Industrial Electricity Prices $0.10 $0.09 $0.08 Industrial Electric Price ($/kwh) $0.07 $0.06 $0.05 $0.04 $0.03 $0.02 $0.01 $0.00 Sectoral Climate Policies 16

Industrial Annual Electric Bills per $1000 of Value Added $14.00 Industrial Annual Electric Bills per $1000 of Value Added $12.00 $10.00 $8.00 $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 $0.00 Sectoral Climate Policies 17

Industrial Natural Gas Prices $12.00 $10.00 Industrial Gas Price ($/MMBTU) $8.00 $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 $0.00 Sectoral Climate Policies 18

Industrial Annual Natural Gas Bills per $1000 of Value Added $12.00 Industrial Annual Gas Bills per $1000 of Value Added $10.00 $8.00 $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 $0.00 Sectoral Climate Policies 19

Gasoline Price $4.50 $4.00 $3.50 Gasoline Price ($/Gallon) $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 Sectoral Climate Policies 20

Total Coal Usage 1,400 1,200 Millions of Short Tons of Coal 1,000 800 600 400 200 CATF Waxman-Markey/ Sectoral 0 Sectoral Climate Policies 21

Coal Capacity Additions with Carbon Sequestration 80 70 GW of New Coal Capacity with CCS 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Sectoral Climate Policies 22

Natural Gas Capacity Additions 140 120 GW of New Gas-Fired Capacity 100 80 60 40 20 0 Sectoral Climate Policies 23

Nuclear Capacity Additions 120 100 GW of New Nuclear Capacity 80 60 40 20 0 Sectoral Climate Policies 24

Renewable Capacity Additions 100 90 80 GW of New Renewable Capacity 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Sectoral Climate Policies 25

Power Generation Fractions in 2020 60% Coal Fraction Gas Fraction Nuclear Fraction 50% 49.0% 48.1% Renewable Fraction 46.1% 42.0% Percentage of Generation 40% 30% 20% 21.1% 20.0% 19.4% 19.2% 19.7% 15.6% 15.5% 15.6% 14.6% 20.1% 17.5% 10% 9.5% 0% Reference Case in 2006 Sectoral Climate Policies 26

Power Generation Fractions in 2030 60% Coal Fraction Gas Fraction 50% 49.0% 45.7% Nuclear Fraction Renewable Fraction 45.2% Percentage of Generation 40% 30% 20% 20.0% 19.4% 19.3% 17.6% 15.8% 33.0% 28.8% 21.7% 15.0% 13.8% 19.4% 20.0% 10% 9.5% 0% Reference Case in 2006 Sectoral Climate Policies 27

Caveats on Modeling Models are useful tools, but do not reliably predict the future with great accuracy in part because: They rely on a great many assumptions including long-range fuel price forecasts. Energy technology performance and cost assumptions typically do not range far from current conditions in the model. They necessarily simplify reality for example, the complex power system consisting of several thousand different generating units is reduced in NEMS to about 200 model power plants that attempt to statistically reflect reality. Models will not capture the potentially significant psychological changes that might occur with enactment of climate policy we are really moving into a carbon constrained world that could materially impact investor behavior. Models cannot capture political opposition to certain technologies. Models are technology stagnant. Modeling can only employ technologies that at least exist today and must assume a cost curve and performance curve that may not reflect the real world. While models produce exact numbers, care should be taken to focus on the trends and the directionality of the model results. And finally, models have a hard time keeping up with major economic changes such as the recent global collapse. The current version of NEMS still does not reflect the full impact of this collapse. Sectoral Climate Policies 28