Changes of land use in Fulbaria and Trishal upazila of Mymensingh district of Bangladesh

Similar documents
An economic analysis of winter vegetables production in some selected areas of Narsingdi district

Impact of Fish Farming on Household Income: A Case Study from Mymensingh District

PROFITABILITY OF ONION CULTIVATION IN SOME SELECTED AREAS OF BANGLADESH

Comparative economic analysis of pond fish production tn Mymensingh and J essore Districts, Bangladesh

Socioeconomic Analysis of Alternative Farming Systems in Improving Livelihood Security of Small Farmers in Selected Areas of Bangladesh

Causes and possible solutions of poverty perceived by char dwellers in Bangladesh

WASTE DISPOSAL AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN RURAL AREAS OF MYMENSINGH

TREND AND OUTPUT GROWTH ANALYSIS OF MAJOR FRUITS IN CHITTAGONG REGION OF BANGLADESH M. JAMAL UDDIN 1, S. R. DEY 2 AND TAHMINA TASLIM 3.

Bangladesh 3 Department of Fisheries Management, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh,

Poverty reduction through women employment in farms and rice mills in an area of Dinajpur district

IMPACT OF MAIZE RESEARCH AND EXTENSION IN BANGLADESH

PROBLEMS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FARMERS ADOPTION OF IPM PRACTICES IN RICE (Oryza sativa L) CULTIVATION M. M. RAHMAN 1. Abstract

PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF BAGDA FARMING IN SOME SELECTED AREAS OF SATKHIRA DISTRICT

FOOD SECURITY CONDITION OF LANDLESS PEOPLE IN A CHAR AREA OF RANGPUR DISTRICT ABSTRACT

EFFECT OF RHIZOBIUM INOCULATION ON NODULATION AND YIELD OF CHICKPEA IN CALCAREOUS SOIL M.A.H. BHUIYAN 1, D. KHANAM 2, M.F. HOSSAIN 3 AND M.S.

Participation of Rural Youth in Fish Farming Activities. Abstract

NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND YIELD OF ONION AS INFLUENCED BY NITROGEN AND SULPHUR FERTILIZATION

Study on Impact of Land Fragmentation in Agriculture-A Case of Rajshahi District, Bangladesh

Sustainable Soil Management Component (SSMC) of the OCP Foundation s Agricultural Development Project in Bangladesh Stage 1

Farmers Perception about the Extension Services and Extension Workers: The Case of Organic Agriculture Extension Program by PROSHIKA

Profitability of Summer BARI Hybrid Tomato Cultivation in Jessore District of Bangladesh

PROFITABILITY OF BETEL LEAF (Piper betle L.) CULTIVATION IN SOME SELECTED SITES OF BANGLADESH. Abstract

The Integrated Survey Framework in the Redesign of. Sample Surveys in China Agricultural and Rural Statistics. Zhao Jianhua 1.

Sustainable Soil Management Component (SSMC) of OCP Foundation s Agricultural Development Project in Bangladesh Stage 1

MEASUREMENT OF PRODUCTIVITY AND EFFICIENCY OF POTATO PRODUCTION IN TWO SELECTED AREAS OF BANGLADESH: A TRANSLOG STOCHASTIC FRONTIER ANALYSIS

OPTIMUM IRRIGATION OF WHEAT PRODUCTION AT BAU FARM

Brief 4: An Analysis of Household Income and Expenditure in Tanzania

ADOPTION OF RECOMMENDED POTATO (Solanum tuberosum) PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES BY THE POTATO GROWERS OF SOME SELECTED AREAS OF BANGLADESH.

Growth and Trend in Area, Production and Yield of Major Crops of Bangladesh

Economics of fertilizer use in the Maize-Mungbean/Dhaincha-T.aman rice cropping pattern

Factors Influencing Economic Viability of Marginal and Small Farmers in Punjab 1

Research Note GROWTH, PRICE INSTABILITY AND FLEXIBILITY OF MAJOR CROPS IN BANGLADESH. Proloy Barua Shamsul Alam ABSTRACT I.

TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF THE HATCHERY OPERATORS IN FISH SEED PRODUCTION FARMS IN TWO SELECTED AREAS OF BANGLADESH

Growth performance of three genotypes of ducks in coastal region of Bangladesh

DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS OF ECONOMIC FACTORS ON FARMERS' ADOPTION OF ECOLOGICAL AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES: A PATH ANALYSIS

Environmental impact assessment on frequency of pesticide use during vegetable production

GO-NGO Support in Selected Char Areas of Sirajganj District in Bangladesh: Impact on Crop Profitability and Farmers Income Generation

TECHNOLOGY OF PRODUCING TEAK TIMBER FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND: TOWARD SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT

LAND USE PLANNING: AN APPROACH TO POVERTY REDUCTION AND STABILISATION OF SHIFTING CULTIVATION IN THE LAO UPLANDS TO IMPROVE UPLAND LIVELIHOODS

Socioeconomic Conditions, Agricultural Practices and Communication Status of the Vulnerable Haor People in. Bangladesh

Agriculture in China - Successes, Challenges, and Prospects. Prof. Zhihao Zheng College of Economics & Management China Agricultural University

Effects of sluice gate on fisheries and crops production at Jugini CPP Area, Tangail, Bangladesh

WELCOME. Department Of Agricultural Extension Ministry of Agriculture

Farmers Perception about One House One Farm Project and Its Impact on Enterprise Profitability in Selected Areas of Mymensingh District

Gender in the Lao PDR on the agriculture sector

Effect of Arsenic Contaminated Irrigation Water on the Cultivation of Red Amaranth

AIMS pilot project. Monitoring the rehabilitation of degraded landscapes from Food Assistance for Assets programmes with satellite imagery

Agriculture: Engine of Rural Economic Growth in Myanmar. Duncan Boughton, Aung Hein and Ben Belton Yangon, December 8, 2015

Culture Practice of Thai Koi (Anabas Testudineus) With Different Stocking Densities at Tarakanda in Mymensingh District

Organic beef cattle Sirajgonj district in Bangladesh

Study on morphometric, productive and reproductive traits of native cattle at Sylhet district

THE POTENTIAL FOR REFORESTATION IN AGRICULTURAL LEASES WITHIN THE DAWSON CREEK AND PRINCE GEORGE SPECIAL SALE AREAS. October, 1991

Prospects for the sectoral transformation of the rural economy in Tanzania

Economics of sugarcane cultivation in some selected char lands of Bangladesh

SOCIO-ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION IN UGANDA: for attainment of Middle Income Status

Unit A: General Agricultural Machinery. LESSON 3: Recognizing the Impact of Technological Advances in Agricultural Mechanics

Lesson. Recognizing the Impact of Technological Advances in Agricultural Mechanics

Evaluation of a method of estimating agricultural chemical use

Monitoring Natural Sal Forest Cover in Modhupur, Bangladesh using Temporal Landsat Imagery during

Election 2001: National Policy Forum. Dhaka: August, 2001 Organized by: Centre for Policy Dialogue, Prothom Alo, The Daily Star

Adopted January 15, 1996 Hood River County Ordinance #201

HOUSEHOLD LEVEL PURIFICATION TECHNIQUE TREND IN DHAKA CITY

Simulated Energy Scenarios of the Power Sector in Bangladesh

3.3.3 Landscape-Directed Soil Sampling

Agriculture in Hokkaido Japan. January 2018 Department of Agriculture Hokkaido Government

Profitability and technical efficiency of Boro rice (BRRI dhan29) cultivation in Dinajpur and Bogra of Bangladesh

Technical Assistance in Agricultural Statistics, the Experience of Uganda

Study on fish hatchery and nurseries in Mymensingh, Bangladesh

HOW WILL VERTICAL FARMING INCREASE THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE TOTAL GDP OF THE PHILIPPINES?

Comparative Study of IPM Technologies and Farmers Conventional Pest Management Practices on Cabbage Cultivation. Abstract

Securing Soil Carbon Benefits. UNEP Year Book 2014 emerging issues update

Changing Pattern of Area, Production and Productivity of Principal Crops in Haryana, India

Women and Climate Change

On-farm evaluation of production potential and economics of Wheat- Jute-T.aman rice-based cropping system

MAIN REPORT of SOCIO ECONOMIC BASELINE SURVEY (SEBS) AND PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISAL (PRA)

Assessment of Tree Resources Outside Forest Based on Remote Sensing Satellite Data

Sheela Kumare A model farmer from village Lonsawali

FARMERS' TECHNOLOGY, ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE AND RELATIVE ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF COUNTRY BEAN GROWERS

Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia 2

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): AGRICULTURE, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT 1

Comparative and competitive advantage of soybean cultivation in Noakhali and Laxmipur District of Bangladesh

TARGETING WATERSHEDS FOR RESTORATION ACTIVITIES IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED. Technical Documentation October 4, 2002

Chapter 5: Sustaining Soil Quality

RURAL MARKETS IN BANGLADESH AND THE RURAL MAINTENANCE PROGRAMME

not to be republished NCERT Chapter 6 Non-competitive Markets 6.1 SIMPLE MONOPOLY IN THE COMMODITY MARKET

Resource Use Efficiency In Onion Production Among Participating And Non-Participating

Estimation of agricultural resource inequality in India using Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient approach

Performance of participatory and non-participatory farmers of integrated crop management project at Pirganj upazila under Thakurgaon district

Shoreland Rules Revision Project Using GIS in North-Central Minnesota

MARINE POLLUTION DEGRADATION MITIGATION MANAGEMENT IS ESSENTIAL FOR IMPROVING MARINE ENVIRONMENT

Master Plan for Agricultural Development in the Southern Region of Bangladesh

VIABILITY OF AGRICULTURAL INPUT VOUCHERS

Explaining and Understanding Declines in U.S. CO 2 Emissions

Impact Assessment of Agricultural Extension Reforms in Bihar. K.M. Singh 1, M.S. Meena 2 and A.K. Jha 3 ABSTRACT

Cost and return analysis of banana cultivation under institutional loan in Bogra, Bangladesh

Global Environment Outlook 5 Environnent for the future we want

Advantages of Using Laser Scan and UAV Technology in Virtual Asset Management

Effect of Climate change in the Albertine Rift of Uganda

TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF SHRIMP FARMERS IN BANGLADESH: A STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION ANALYSIS

Volume Title: Diversification and Integration in American Industry. Volume URL:

Transcription:

J. Bangladesh Agril. Univ. 12(1): 13 18, 2014 ISSN 1810-3030 Changes of land use in Fulbaria and Trishal upazila of Mymensingh district of Bangladesh J. Akther 1, M. A. Kader 1, M. Rahman 2* and M. Shawkhatuzzaman 2 1 Department of Soil Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, and Development Institute, Mymensingh-2200, Bangladesh, *E-mail: mail2mukit@gmail.com 2 Soil Resource Abstract There is no reliable information till now on the conversion rate of agricultural land in Bangladesh into different non agricultural sectors. The study was undertaken to estimate the present land use pattern and to calculate the changes in land use of agricultural and non-agricultural field over time using aerial photographs of Trishal and Fulbaria upazila of Mymensingh district. Two series of aerial photographs of both upazilas from 1983 and 2000 at scales of 1:40,000 and 1:25,000, respectively, were studied. Land use categories were calculated by random line drawing method on effective areas of aerial photograph. In 1983, Total agricultural and non-agricultural land of Trishal upazila were found 29,505 and 4,095 ha accounting 87.81 and 12.2% of total land area, respectively. In Fulbaria upazila for the same year, it was 35,611 and 4,258 ha accounting 89.3% and 10.7% of total land area, respectively,. An amount of about 3545 and 3637 ha agricultural land was transformed into non-agricultural land in Trishal and Fulbaria upazila, respectively, within a period of 17 years. The rate of decreasing agricultural land to non agricultural land in Trishal and Fulbaria upazila was estimated to be 0.62 and 0.54% /annum, respectively. Land use analysis shows that conversion of agricultural land into settlement, transport network and water body contributed 88.07, 5.3 and 6.63% of the land loss, respectively in Trishal upazila and 98.45, 1.3 and 0.12% of the land loss, respectively in Fulbaria upazila. If similar trends in loss of agricultural land remain constant, there will be no land available for cultivation after around 200 years. Therefore, it is very crying need for the country to make a land use policy for food security of the rapidly growing population. Keywords: Land use, Changes of agricultural land to non-agricultural land Introduction Bangladesh is one of the most densely populated countries in the world having only 12.5 decimals per capita cultivated land (BBS, 2011). With the growing population, and their increasing needs in various sectors, land use patterns are changing over time with the loosing of cultivated land. In a densely populated country like Bangladesh, which is already experiencing high pressure on its natural resource base, a decline in the availability of agricultural land could have devastating consequences on the country s ability to achieve sustainability and maintain self-sufficiency targets, as well as in guaranteeing the food security of households with agriculturally based livelihoods. Natural land cover is changing by interfere of human in meeting cultivation, homestead, infrastructures or other demands. Reportedly, over the last 30-40 years, the availability of agricultural land has been declining at the rate of 1% per year (Planning Commission, 2009). If this is true, at least one quarter of the country's agricultural land has been lost over the last 30-40 years. Although the 1% figure is widely quoted, reliable and scientifically based data quantifying the extent of fertile and arable agricultural land and the changes in availability of agricultural land, is not available. The lack of accurate information on the pattern and magnitude of change in land availability undermines the ability to take action since policy makers are unable to determine where and what actions are needed and where they are most needed (Hasan et al., 2013). In these circumstances, the study was undertaken to estimate the present land use pattern of Trishal and Fulbaria upazila of Mymensingh district using aerial photographs and to calculate the changes in land use in agricultural and non-agricultural field over time. Aerial photos recorded all visible features on the Earth's surface from an overhead perspective. Land cover/land uses are classified often on the basis of tone, texture, pattern, shade and other features of the aerial photographs. The interpretation of aerial photograph may vary from interpreter to interpreter due to differences of vision and experience. In spite of these limitations, it is realized that the application of aerial photography in the calculation of land uses is most useful technique in Bangladesh where satellite system is not well developed.

14 Changes of land use in Fulbaria and Trishal upazila Materials and Methods The study was conducted in the district office of Soil Resource Development Institute (SRDI), Mymensingh. The study areas were two upazilas of Mymensinghviz; Fulbaria and Trishal. The experimental site Fulbariaand Trishal are comprised of 39,870 (Islam, 1992) and 33,601 ha of total lands (Alam, 2008), respectively. Two series of aerial photographs of both upazilas from 1983 and 2000 at scales of 1:40,000 and 1:25,000 respectively were collected for this study. Due to unavailability of 2010 s photographs most recent data could not be gathered in this study. Fixing effective areas of the photographs The photo survey was designed to acquire 60 percent forward overlap (between photos along the same flight line) and 15-25 percent lateral overlap (between photos on adjacent flight lines). Effective area was the main area of a photograph by deducting the overlapped area. At first the centre of two adjacent aerial photographs, called the principal point, was marked. Secondly, the principal point of the right image was plotted in its position on the left image. At the same time the principal point of the left image was also plotted on the right image. These principal points and transferred points were aligned along a straight line. Then the 20 percent overlapping area of two adjacent runs was deducted. Finally, remaining area as in rectangular shape was considered as effective area of the photograph (Fig. 1). Analysis of aerial photographs Fig. 1. Fixation of effective areas of an aerial photograph This phase deals with delineating different categories of land cover and land use in the study area. This study resorts to human skills in photo interpretation to identify and delineate land use and cover classes. Each of those land use categories was discerned from the others by a combination of tone and texture. Measurement of land use by category Random line drawing method was followed for the measurement of land use in Fulbaria and Trishal upazila. In this method, firstly effective area of a photograph was drawn on aerial photographs by using sharp pencil. Then several parallel lines were drawn on the rectangular effective area on photo maintaining a distance of 1 cm between the parallel lines. For an example, Fig. 2 shows the parallel lines drawn on the rectangular effective area of an aerial photo maintaining a distance of 1 cm between the parallel lines. Finally, land uses were calculated for each parallel line drawn on the effective area. Calculation procedure The linear distance of each land use category was calculated from the parallel lines drawn on the rectangular effective area of an aerial fig. The cumulated linear distance of each land use category was summed again to calculate the total linear distance. Then the cumulated linear distance of each land use category was divided by the total linear distance and multiplied by 100 to convert each land use into percentage. For example, if there are 8 lines on an effective area having 10 cm length, then the total length is 80 cm. In these 80 cm, if water body covers 2 cm then the percentage of water body is 2/80 100= 2.5 %.

Akther et al. 15 Results and Discussion Fig. 2. Measurement of land use by drawing random line on aerial photo Land Use of Trishal upazilain 1983 and 2000 Total area of Trishal upazila is about 33,601 ha (BBS 2001). From image interpretation, total agricultural and non-agricultural land (1983) of this upazila was found 29505 ha and 4095 ha accounting 87.81% and 12.19% of total land area. Non-agricultural land was comprised of 3682 ha settlement, 67 ha transport network and 346 ha water body accounting 10.96%, 0.20% and 1.03% of total land area (Fig. 3). Fig. 3. Categories of land use in Trishal upazila in 1983 (left) and 2000 (right) In 2000, total agricultural land of this upazila was estimated to be 25960 ha representing 77.26% of total land area and total non-agricultural land was estimated to be 7640 ha representing 22.74% of total land area. Non-agricultural land was comprised of 6804 ha settlement, 255 ha transport network and 581 ha water body representing 20.25%, 0.76%, 1.73% of total land area respectively (Fig. 3). This result is very close to the Soil Resource Development Institute s (SRDI) result where they reported that at Trishal upazila about 78.3 percent of total land was under agriculture in 1996 (Land Use Map, SRDI, 1996). Land use changes in Trishal upazila The land cover change analysis, based on the comparison between the 1983 and 2000 aerial photos, was accomplished to quantify land transformations and evaluate how land cover changed in the time interval. An amount of about 3544.9 ha agricultural land was transformed into non-agricultural land in Trishal upazila within a period of 17 years from 1983 to 2000. It accounts 10.55% of total land area of this upazila (Fig. 4).

16 Changes of land use in Fulbaria and Trishal upazila Fig. 4. Agricultural and non-agricultural land in TrishalUpazila between 1983 and 2000 The rate of decreasing agricultural land to non agricultural land in Trisal upazila was 0.621% /annum or 208.5 ha/annum. Majority of agricultural land in Trishal upazila was converted to settlement. Thus, the land coverage under settlement increased from 3682 ha to 6804 ha between 1983 and 2000. Similar result has been reported by Quasem (2011) who estimated an annual conversion of farm land to nonagricultural land to be 0.56 % from a field survey conducted since 2001 to 2008 covering 24 villages of six divisions of the country. There could be different rate of land use change however, it is clear that the agricultural land has been converting to non-agricultural land over time. Land use of Fulbaria upazilain 1983 and 2000 Total land area of Fulbaria upazila is about 39,870 ha (BBS 2001). From image interpretation, total agricultural land (1983) of this upazila was estimated to be 35611 ha accounting 89.32% of total land area and total non-agricultural land was 4258 ha accounting 10.68% of total land area. Non-agricultural land was comprised of 3396 ha settlement, 231 ha transport network and 634 ha water body accounting 8.52%, 0.58% and 1.59% of total land area, respectively (Fig. 5). Total agricultural land of this upazila was estimated to be 31976 ha representing 80.20% of total land area and total non-agricultural land was estimated to be 7894 ha representing 19.80% of total land area in 2000. Non-agricultural land was comprised of 6977 ha settlement, 279 ha transport network and 638 ha water body representing 17.50%, 0.70%, 1.60% of total land area, respectively (Fig. 5). Fig. 5. Categories of land use in FulbariaUpazila in 1983 (left) and 2000 (right) Land use changes in Fulbaria upazila The land cover change analysis, based on the comparison between 1983 and 2000 aerial photos, was accomplished to quantify land transformations and evaluate how land cover changed in the time interval. An amount of about 3636.14 ha agricultural land was transformed into non-agricultural land in Fulbaria upazila within a period of 17 years from 1983 to 2000. It accounts 9.12% of total land area of this upazila (Fig. 6).

Akther et al. 17 Fig. 6. Agricultural land to non-agricultural land infulbariaupazila between 1983 and 2000 Therefore, the rate of decreasing agricultural land to non agricultural land was 0.536% or 213.9 ha/annum. The land coverage under settlement increased from 3397 ha to 6977 ha between 1983 and 2000. But according to BBS, decline of agricultural land was about 0.383% annually from 1980-81 to 2006-07 (27 years average), 0.75% annually from 1983-84 to 1993-94 (10 years average) and 0.40% annually from 1993-94 to 2003-04 (10 years average) (Quasem, 2011). Differences in land use change among the reported results might be due to use of different protocol in estimating land use change. Majority of agricultural land in Fulbaria upazila was converted to settlement to accommodate the rapidly increasing population. On the other hand, many business enterprises were established in Fulbaria in recent past. Comparison of land use change in Trishal and Fulbaria upazila The rate of change of land use category in both the upazila was bit different but the trend was similar. Rate of decreasing agricultural land to non agricultural land in Fulbaria upazila was 0.536% or 213.9 ha/annum whereas it was 0.621% or 208.5 ha/annum in TrishalUpazila. The increment of non-agricultural land was comparatively higher in Trishal than that of Fulbaria. The rate of change of land use category under non-agricultural land was also different in two upazilas. Percentage of settlement in Fulbaria was increased from 8.52 to 17.5 where it was increased from 10.96 to 20.25 in Trishal upazila (Fig 7). Transport network in Fulbaria was increased from 0.58% to 0.70% whereas it was increased from 0.20% to 0.76% in Trishal upazila over 17 years (Fig 7). The transport network increased more in Trishal than Fulbaria upazila. Similarly, land coverage under water body was increased much in Trishal upazila compared to Fulabari upazila. In 1983, land coverage under water body represented 1.03% of total area which broadened into 1.73% of total area in 2000. Contrary, land coverage under water body was almost similar between 1983 (1.59%) and 2000(1.60%) (Fig. 7). Majority of agricultural land in both the Trishal and Fulbaria upazila was converted to settlement to accommodate the rapidly growing population. On the other hand, many business enterprises, schoolcollege-madrashas, mosque-girzas were established in recent past with the advancement of economy of the country. Thus, the land coverage under settlement increased from 3682 to 6804 ha in Trishal and 3397 ha to 6977 in Fulbaria upazila between 1983 and 2000. The communication and transport network also developed rapidly with the economic advancement of the country. Thus, the transport network was increased from 67 to 255 ha in Trishal and 231 to 279 ha in Fulbaria upazila between 1983 and 2000. There was a sharp increase in transport network in Trishal compared to Fulbaria upazila. This might be due to the fact that TrishalUpazila has direct connection with capital Dhaka. In ninty scommercial fish cultivation became very popular in Mymensingh region as it was profitable compared to crop culture. Therefore, many agricultural lands were converted to water body to construct ponds for fish culture. The large increment in land coverage under water body in Trishal upazila from 346 to 581 ha supports the above assumption. However, it was not found remarkable in Fulbaria upazila. This might be due to the natural availability of some low lying areas in Fulbaria upazila. Thus, the land overage under water body represented 1.54% of the total area in 1983 which was much higher than the land area

18 Changes of land use in Fulbaria and Trishal upazila under water body in Trishal upazila (1.03%) in the same year. These natural water bodies were shrinking over time naturally due to sedimentation coming from uplands. Moreover, part of these water bodies was filled artificially for settlement. Therefore, we expect a decrease in share of land under water body with time. However, there was slight increase in land under water body in 2000 representing 1.60% of the total land area. These slight increases in land under water body might be due to conversion of land in water body by constructing ponds for fish cultivation. Fig. 7. Comparison of components of non-agricultural lands between 1983 and 2000 in Trishal (left) and Fulbaria (right) upazila The increment of non-agricultural land was comparatively higher in Trishal than that of Fulbaria may be due to location of the upazila. Trishal is located on the side of Dhaka-Mymensingh highway where establishment rate of various industries and business enterprises were quite higher than the Fulbaria. Summary and Conclusion Rate of decreasing agricultural land to non agricultural land in Fulbaria upazila was 0.54% or 213.9 ha/annum, whereas 0.62% or 208.5 ha/annum was in Trishal upazila. From this study, it can be concluded that agricultural land of Trishal and Fulbaria upazilahas been decreasing day by day which is similar to our national scenario. Majority of agricultural land in both upazila was converted to settlement for accommodating the rapidly growing population. On the other hand, many business enterprises were established in Trishal and Fulbaria upazila in recent past. With the economic advancement of the country there was an improvement of communication and transport facilities. Thus, the transport network was also increased. If similar trends in loss of agricultural land remain constant, there will be no land available for cultivation approximately after 200 years. The result of this study will be very helpful for the nation because there is no solid information available till now based on scientific basis. Decreasing rate of agricultural land is alarming for our national economy particularly to feed the rapidly growing population. References Alam, S. 2008.Land and Soil Resources Utilization Guide, Trishal upazila, Mymensingh district, Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. 2001. Population Census 2001: Ministry of Planning, Government of the People s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics.2011. Agricultural Census of Bangladesh: Ministry of Planning, Government of the People s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Hasan, M.N., Hossain, M.S., Bari, M.A., Islam, M.R. 2013.Agricultural land availability in Bangladesh. SRDI, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 42pp. Islam, N. 1992.Land and Soil Resources Utilization Guide, Fulbaria upazila, Mymensingh district, Bangladesh. Land Use Map. 1996. Soil Resource Development Institute (SRDI). Dhaka, Bangladesh. Planning Commission. 2009. Steps Towards Change: National Strategy for Accelerated Poverty Reduction II (Revised). FY 2009-11. Government of the People s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Quasem, M.A. 2011. Conversion of Agricultural Land to Non-agricultural Uses in Bangladesh: Extents and Determinants, Bangladesh Development Studies, Vol. XXXIV, No.1.