Plant Life Management in Transition from Operation to Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants. National experience, Finland.

Similar documents
Decommissioning plans for TVO's new reactors

Finnish Approach to Nuclear Waste and Competence Management

National Status on Life Management of NPPs in Finland Meeting of the IAEA TWG-LMNPP February th 2017 Vienna, Jyrki Kohopää

WM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Current Status of the Nuclear Waste Management Programme in Finland 13441

LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT OF LOVIISA NPP

Regulatory oversight of nuclear safety in Finland

Finnish report on nuclear safety

Regulatory Approach to Radiation Protection in new NPPs in Finland

SEVERE ACCIDENT FEATURES OF THE ALTERNATIVE PLANT DESIGNS FOR NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN FINLAND

Olli Vilkamo; Kirsi Alm-Lytz Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, STUK. Radiation Safety in New Build

C/S in Final Disposal Processes Swedish and Finnish Perspectives

WM2014 Conference, March 2 6, 2014, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Johan Andersson * and Tiina Jalonen ** * Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co (SKB), Sweden ** Posiva Oy, Finland

Application for a supplement to the Decision-in-Principle M 2/2010 vp concerning the construction of the Olkiluoto 4 nuclear power plant unit

Decommissioning three main strategies: Immediate dismantling, Safe enclosure (Deferred dismantling), Entombment

NEWCOMER STATES AND FINNISH SAFEGUARDS SUPPORT PROGRAMME TO THE IAEA

UNDERGROUND CHARACTERISATION AND RESEARCH FACILITY ONKALO ANTTI IKONEN, MIA YLÄ-MELLA, TIMO ÄIKÄS POSIVA Oy Olkiluoto, Finland

Nuclear waste management in Sweden compared to nuclear waste management in Denmark

Regulatory oversight of nuclear safety in Finland

Environmental Impact Assessment Programme Summary. Extension of the Olkiluoto nuclear power plant by a fourth unit

DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES IN UKRAINE

Disposal Options for Radioactive Waste

Draft Summary of Plant Life Management in Transition from Operation to Decommissioning for Nuclear Power Plants. Prepared by core team

Our environment LOVIISA POWER PLANT. Join the. change

TECHNICAL MEETING ON TECHNICAL SUPPORT ORGANIZATION (TSO) ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES May 2013

Challenges for a TSO supporting both the regulator and industry. Eija Karita Puska VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DECOMMISSIONING IN SLOVAK REPUBLIC

Joint Convention on the safety of spent fuel management and on the safety of radioactive waste management

COMMUNICATION ABOUT RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT

APPROACH TO PRACTICAL ELIMINATION IN FINLAND

GenIII/III+ Nuclear Reactors

Decommissioning, Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel Management in Slovakia

Decommissioning Worldwide and NEA Activities

Clearance, Reuse, Recycle, disposal as VLLW.

The EnBW Strategyfor Decommissioningand DismantlingofNuclearPower Plants»

Olkiluoto Infrastructure

Sweden s nuclear fuel cycle policy

INPP Decommissioning Overview Darius Janulevičius

European level recommendations Sect. in NAcP 2 Generic recommendation for WENRA, Finland participates and follows the work.

WM2014 Conference, March 2 6, 2014, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Government Decision-in-Principle of 6 May 2010 on the Application of Teollisuuden Voima Oyj Regarding Construction of a Nuclear Power Plant Unit

Review of Generation III Reactors

Greifswald Project Introduction/Experience summary Axel Bäcker

Copper corrosion studies in the Finnish Research Programme on Nuclear Waste Management

THE ROLE OF THE WORLD'S LARGEST INTERIM STORAGE FOR WASTE AND FUEL WITHIN THE DECOM PROJECT OF 6 WWER REACTORS IN GREIFSWALD AND RHEINSBERG (GERMANY)

Technological Solutions of SF Storage in the World

Decommissioning Planning

An assessment by the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority on the periodic safety review of Loviisa NPP

Expected Waste Streams Originating from the Decommissioning of NPPs: German Situation as Compared to International Standards 16447

D&D of Nuclear Power Plants - Global Emerging Issues and Strategies

ADVANCED DECOMMISSIONING COSTING CALCULATION TOOLS FOR PILOT VIENNA TRIGA MARK-II RESEARCH REACTOR

Joint Convention on the safety of spent fuel management and on the safety of radioactive waste management

THE NATIONAL DISPOSAL FACILITY A State-of-the-Art Solution for Bulgaria s Radioactive Waste

Construction Technologies and Management of NPP

French Licensing approaches for LTO

Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities: The Work Ahead and How to Succeed

Spent Fuel Management and Storage in Germany

NKS Seminar on Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities, September 14-16, 2010

Complementary considerations in the safety case, support from natural analogues and natural systems

PROGRESS IN THE PREPARATION OF A DECOMMISSIONING PLAN

Safety functions, performance targets and technical design requirements for a KBS-3V repository

SAFIR SAFIR2014 Final Seminar. Hanasaari Jari Hämäläinen

International Experience Exchange and Co-operation at the NEA for Safe and Efficient Decommissioning and Radioactive Waste Management

Decommissioning of NPPs with spent nuclear fuel present - efforts to amend the German regulatory framework to cope with this situation

Decommissioning Group Ketut Kamajaya

Treatment, volume reduction and recycling of large components such as heat exchanges, steam generators and boilers

0 SUMMARY 4. 1 INTRODUCTION AND METHOD Purpose Method Scope and Assumptions Scope Assumptions 12

Environmental Report Teollisuuden Voima Oyj Well-being with nuclear electricity

DECOMMISSIONING PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT IN JAPAN ATOMIC ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE

for ELFORSK (the Electrical Utilities R & D Company, Sweden)

Dismantling Techniques applied at MZFR

V T T T I E D O T T E I T A

Decommissioning and Energy Transition in Germany KEPIC Week /09/2017

TROJAN DECOMMISSIONING STATUS. OPUC Meeting March 8, 2005 (draft)

The Strategies of Research and Education on Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities in the University of Fukui

Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities. The Decommissioning Process. Lesson Objectives. Decommissioning. Decontamination. Decommissioning Objective

Geological Disposal in Romania

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

TOPICAL SESSION MANAGEMENT OF DECOMMISSIONING WASTES

Environmental Report Teollisuuden Voima Oyj Well-being with nuclear electricity

Zion Project Overview S. Chris Baker VP EH&S

OSART Good Practices OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE FEEDBACK Utilization and dissemination of operating experience

References Calculation Projects

Spent Fuel Management in Slovakia

Radioactive Waste Disposal. Piero Risoluti

Radioactive Waste Management at the NCSR Demokritos - Greece

USE OF HIGHLY SELECTIVE ION EXCHANGERS FOR MINIMIZATION OF WASTE VOLUMES

OE Supply-Chain in Nuclear Dr. Boris Gehring March 2017

Spent Fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors

FOSH Forsmark Safety Enhancement Project Post-Fukushima actions at Forsmark NPP

Status of Decommissioning Preparation for Kori #1

Economic and Environmental Aspects of Long-term Spent Fuel Storage (UK Perspective)

WASTE MANAGEMENT for FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI Some considerations from afar

Nuclear Electricity from Olkiluoto. Teollisuuden Voima Oyj Well-being with nuclear electricity

Units 3 and 4 Cernavoda NPP Project Envisaged Ownership Structure and Operation and Maintenance

Low-Level Waste and Radiation Management

WM2015 Conference, March 15-19, 2015, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

PRESENT STATUS OF LEGAL & REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND DECOMMISSIONING PLANNING FOR DNRR. Prepared by NUCLEAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE, VAEC.

Preparation for Future Defuelling and Decommissioning Works on EDF Energy s UK Fleet of Advanced Gas Cooled Reactors

ANSTO s POLICY for MOATA & HIFAR. Prepared by John Rowling November 2007

Transcription:

Plant Life Management in Transition from Operation to Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants. National experience, Finland. Jari Tuunanen, 30 Aug.2016

Contents Background Status of decommissioning plans of Loviisa NPP Transition phase from operation to decommissioning Plant life management issues Summary 2

Background (1) Status of the operating Finnish NPPs and plants under construction Olkiluoto 1 and 2 operating license will be updated 2018 Loviisa 1 and 2 have operating license until 2027 and 2030 Olkiluoto 3 should start operation around 2018, remaining works completed next spring. Fennovoima 1 plant construction should begin around 2018 Small scale decommissioning projects under way at VTT Technical research centre of Finland FiR1 research reactor and active material research laboratory The first NPP decommissioning project begins early 2020 if Loviisa NPP operating life is not prolonged 3

Background (2) Fortum has ownerships in five NPPs in Finland and Sweden Operator and owner of Loviisa NPP with two VVER-440 type PWRs, Partial owner of Olkiluoto NPP with two operating BWRs and one EPR under construction Partial owner of Oskarshamn and Forsmark NPPs Early shutdown of the Swedish Oskarshamn 1 and 2 units Small share of the new Fennovoima plant unit in Finland In addition to the NPP units, Fortum s nuclear operations in Loviisa site include Spent fuel interim storage facility, and Low and intermediate level waste repository. Forum owns a part of Posiva company, which is responsible for planning and management of spent fuel from Olkiluoto and Loviisa NPPs Construction license to spent fuel encapsulation and disposal facility was received 12.11.2015 Only spent fuel disposal is done outside Loviisa NPP site area, all other waste management operations are done on site. 4

Nuclear power* capacity 31 December 2009 Nuclear power Fully-owned Loviisa MW 976 Co-owned Olkiluoto (TVO) Oskarshamn Forsmark Total 463 1 089 696 3 224 A fully-owned nuclear power plant in Loviisa Co-owned nuclear assets: 25% interest in TVO s power plant units in Olkiluoto, Finland. 23% interest in the Forsmark units, Sweden 43% interest in the Oskarshamn units, Sweden Forsmark Oskarshamn Olkiluoto Loviisa * Power capacity refers respectively to Fortum's shares of fully and jointly-owned power plants. 5 Power / Jari Tuunanen

Loviisa 1 and Loviisa 2 6 Power / Jari Tuunanen

Status of decommissioning plan of Loviisa NPP Decommissioning plan is based on immediate dismantling after 50 years of operation. Latest decommissioning plan update made 2012, next update 2018 Plant personnel experience from outage planning and plant operations has been used in decommissioning work plan updates Spent fuel storage, solidification plan and liquid waste storage will be decommissioned in 2060 s Disposal of large components without cutting Site will remain in industrial use, no greenfield All planning is based on technology available today Dismantling of non-radioactive parts is not included Cost estimate around 360 M including waste disposal costs Disposal of decommissioning waste to the existing on-site LILW repository Conceptual design for the extension done based on the waste inventory New safety case for final disposal of the waste Money reserved in nuclear waste fund for decommissioning and other waste management actions 7

Status of the decommissioning plans for Loviisa NPP: Waste inventory based on plant measurements, operating experiences and MCNP-simulations 3D CAD model of the plant available Work-plan for the decommissioning with manpower estimates Basic design of the final disposal facility for decommissioning waste Long term safety analysis for final disposal of the waste Risk analysis of the decommissioning works Cost estimate based on work plan and real disposal costs 8

Decommissioning schedule and phase in Loviisa NPP: 2020 2025 2030 2035 Environmental impact assessment Licensing and extension of the repository Final decom. plan New operation license Licensing, planning and construction phase 2020 2025 2030 2035 Plant operation, LO1 Plant operation, LO2 Transition, LO1 Transition, LO1 Dismantling, LO1, LO2 2025 2030 2035 2040 2050 2060 2065 2070 Disposal of spent fuel Independent operation of the spent fuel storage Dismantling spent fuel storage, solidification plant and liquid waste storage Transition from operation to decommissioning Independent operation And decommissioning of spent from storage 9 Power / Jari Tuunanen

Fig. 4: Final disposal facility for the operational and decommissioning waste from the Loviisa NPP: 10 Picture: Elias Mayer, Fortum P&H

Final disposal of the decommissioning waste from the Loviisa NPP: 11 Power / Jari Tuunanen

Lifting of the RPV with the existing equipment: 12

Preparation during operational phase Storage and maintenance of tools and equipment needed in the decommissioning works Licensing of decommissioning and repository extension Environmental impact assessment Decision in principle (for repository extension) Construction license for the repository extension Operating license for the repository extension New operating license for plant operation Solidification of the liquid waste produced during operation Preparation of the decommissioning plans Modification of the spent fuel storage for transportation of the spent fuel to Olkiluoto for disposal New operating license for post operational period 13

Transition phase from operation to decommissioning Transport of spent fuel to the onsite spent fuel storage Three years needed Construction of transport routes for waste Current plan includes a ramp, but the plan will most probably be changed Construction of packaging and measuring points for the waste Existing rooms will be used A new interim buffer storage for waste may be needed for logistics purposes Purchase of the special equipment needed for the decommissioning work and for the transportation of decommissioning waste. Service of equipment needed during dismantling works Cranes, Preparation of spent fuel storage for independent operation Treatment of remaining radioactive liquids and resins left in the systems, tanks and pools Limited dismantling possible e.g. in reactor hall to prepare for the next phase Adaptation of the organisation for decommissioning phase 14

Other plant life management related issues: On-site underground LILW repository and spent fuel storage will be in operation until 2060 s Aging of concrete, equipment and structures needs attention Integrity of spent fuel storage pools Expertise on e.g. long term safety of final disposal of the waste needed to prepare e.g. periodic safety reviews every 15 years Dismantling of the clean buildings not necessary (not involved in nuclear liabilities) but may be needed Taxes, maintenance issues Possible new plant units on site Not considered in the current planning Operation of the Loviisa 2 when Loviisa 1 is under preparation phase Some common systems Knowledge management after plant closure during the independent operation of the spent fuel storage 15