Condensate Line Sizing for Gravity Returns from Steam Traps and Heat Recovery

Similar documents
Page of ENGINEERING DATA - HOT WATER CAPACITIES, CALCULATIONS AND CORRECTION FACTORS Use the following two tables to determine

CONDENSATION INDUCED WATER HAMMER

Downsizing a Claus Sulfur Recovery Unit

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND EMISSION REDUCTION OF TPM, PM 2.5, AND SO 2 FROM NATURAL GAS AND FUEL OIL FIRED BOILER EXHAUSTS

KEYWORDS: Deaerator, Condensate, Oxygen Removal, Boiler Feed Water, Heater, Water Treatment

Chapter Two. The Rankine cycle. Prepared by Dr. Shatha Ammourah

Solvent Recovery Systems

A COMPLICATED PROJECT FOR POWER AND WATER CO- GENERATION: THE RAF SITE

recycle water reuse it save up to from showers & baths for flushing toilets 30% of water use

Equipment Design. Detailed Plant Conceptual Design. Version 9.0

Large University Central Chiller Plant Design Considerations

Calculate the Costs of Piping System Elements

Chlorinated Organics Closed Loop Unloading of Solvent Tank Trailers

Heat Rejection using Cooling Towers

Geothermal Steam Turbines for Various Purposes

Heat exchangers and thermal energy storage concepts for the off-gas heat of steelmaking devices

The Use of Walnut Shell Filtration with Enhanced Synthetic Media for the Reduction and/or Elimination of Upstream Produced Water Treatment Equipment

ECONOMIZER ECM. Turnkey Price Installed: $115,295

CFFWA-20-1-U Chilled/Hot Water Universal Mount Fan Coil 2-Pipe Heat / Cool Fan Coil 60,000 BTUH

Improvements in Steam Desuperheater Performance

OPERATING PARAMETERS Reliable Means to Continuously Monitor Facility Performance

A - CONTACTOR REACTOR SHELL B - TUBE BUNDLE ASSEMBLY C - HYDRAULIC HEAD D - MOTOR E - IMPELLER F - CIRCULATION TUBE

Gas Dehydration. Chapter 11 Based on presentation by Prof. Art Kidnay

ES Fluid & Thermal Systems Page 1 of 6 STEAM TURBINE LABORATORY

Nuclear Service Valves

System & Equipment Checkout Procedure Client Name Plant Location

THE NOVELEDGE IGCC REFERENCE PLANT: COST AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION POTENTIAL. Gasification Technologies 2004, Washington, DC, October 6, 2004

Ontario s 2012 Building Code Division B, Part 7 Ontario Regulation 332/12

READ ONLY. Adopting Agency BSC SFM. Adopt Entire Chapter Adopt Entire Chapter as amended (amended sections listed below)

Modular Oil & Gas Equipment Onshore & Offshore

Vapor Recovery Units: Agenda

ME ENGINEERING THERMODYNAMICS UNIT III QUESTION BANK SVCET

CONTROL VOLUME ANALYSIS USING ENERGY. By Ertanto Vetra

Chapters 5, 6, and 7. Use T 0 = 20 C and p 0 = 100 kpa and constant specific heats unless otherwise noted. Note also that 1 bar = 100 kpa.

Rolairtrol Air Separator For Hot and Chilled Water Systems

PRESENTATION OF CONDENSATE TREATMENT

Water Quality Specification for Power Supplies

Steam System Energy Efficiency Opportunities and Waste Heat Recovery Keith McBrien GDS Associates

Cooling Tower Operation

20/06/2011 Seminar on Geothermal Exploitation Santiago de Chile

Methane Recovery from Pneumatic Devices, Vapor Recovery Units and Dehydrators

DUST CONTROL AND LOADING SYSTEMS INC. LOADING SYSTEMS

Alexander Rattner MEAM-402 HW 2

Cogeneration. Thermal Chillers. and. .. ASHRAE National Capital Chapter. Arlington, VA 10/10/2012

ENERGY RECOVERY IMPROVEMENT USING ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE AT COVANTA S HAVERHILL FACILITY

C. Up to Two and One-half (2-1/2) inches: Full port, 2-piece, bronze body ball valves with teflon seat conforming to MSS SP-110.

Milk Pre-Cooler Plumbing Considerations. ATCP 65, Wisconsin Administrative Code and the 2015 PMO

Synthetic Fuel Substitutes for Thermal Oxidizers Increased Sustainability, Reduced Natural Gas Consumption

Treatment Technologies

SUGAR INDUSTRY TECHNOLOGISTS MEETING 2000

Steam balance optimisation strategies

Standard Practice for Sampling Steam 1

Comparing Evaporative Technologies for the Recycling of Produced Waters

PINCH ANALYSIS: For the Efficient Use of Energy, Water & Hydrogen. PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY Energy Recovery and Effluent Cooling at a TMP Plant

RTO OR RCO FOR VOC CONTROL: HOW TO DECIDE

PVP INVESTIGATION OF A SHELL AND TUBE EXCHANGER IN LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS VAPORIZATION SERVICE

Paris - Site of 20th IOA World Congress

Absorption Chillers in Industry

ENGINEERING INFORMATION Hot water and steam service

WATER RECYCLING PLANT IN WAFRA. Feras Al Salem

QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL FOR APPLICATORS OF ELASTOMERIC SHEET LININGS

Reducing Maintenance and Saving Fuel with Ellison s Portable Steam Calorimeter

SJT Steam Jet Thermocompressor

Reduction Systems and Equipment at Moss Landing Power Plant

6.1 Introduction to Wastewater Issues

FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI BWR REACTOR SPRAY AND FEED WATER SYSTEMS EVALUATION FOR EARLY FAILURE Dean Wilkie

COKE-OVEN GAS PROCESSING EQUIPMENT

Siphonic. Drain System. Engineered Water Solutions for Today s Building Design Needs

Honeywell Thermal Solutions. Engineering Guide

Central Heating Plants EU 311

Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics Design Project. Production of Ethanol

Case Studies in Energy Efficiency and Water Conservation Projects

GUIDANCE MEMO NO : GUIDANCE CRITERIA FOR THE SEPARATION OF WATER MAINS AND NON-POTABLE PIPELINES

Living With a Septic System A homeowner s guide to basic septic system operation and maintenance

Nuclear Services. Put Our Expertise To Work As Your Single Source For Industrial Cleaning And System Maintenance Solutions.

NIPPON PAPER RO SYSTEM + 2 Others

READ ONLY. Adopting Agency BSC SFM. Adopt Entire Chapter X X X Adopt Entire Chapter as amended (amended sections listed below) X X X X X X

THE AKRON RECYCLE ENERGY SYSTEM: A PERFORMANCE UPDATE

Innovative Process for Comprehensive Treatment of Liquid Radioactive Waste

Chilled Water Distribution Systems. APPA Institute for Facilities Management New Orleans, LA January 19, 2016

SCHNEIDER-KESSEL BERLIN

YARWAY HANCOCK CONTINUOUS BLOWDOWN GLOBE VALVE SERIES 5505

INSTALLING A SEPTIC SYSTEM IN LIVINGSTON COUNTY LIVINGSTON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT 310 TORRANCE AVENUE PONTIAC, IL /

Septic System Basics. Today s Presentation:

GT-LPG Max SM. Maximizing LPG Recovery from Fuel Gas Using a Dividing Wall Column. Engineered to Innovate

WHITE PAPER. HVLS Industrial Fans Evaluation Guide: 7 Defining Application Design Factors That Will Add Up to a Smart Investment

CHILLED WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

ENHANCING THE PART LOAD OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF MSF DESALINATION PLANTS

Degasification of Boiler Feed Water with Liqui-Cel Membrane Contactors

Application Obsolescence and the Nuclear Promise

Kendall Cogeneration Station

KR-153SL SOLUTION. GUARANTEE: 2,2-Dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide 20% COMMERCIAL REGISTRATION NO PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS ACT DANGER

EXPERIMENTS ON THE PERFORMANCE SENSITIVITY OF THE PASSIVE RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM OF AN ADVANCED INTEGRAL TYPE REACTOR

Challenges in Designing Fuel-Fired sco2 Heaters for Closed sco2 Brayton Cycle Power Plants

INSIDE: ASHRAE Hall of Fame

Ethylene Production Plant Design

Design Considerations for Advanced Combined Cycle Plant Using Fast Start Drum Type HRSGs

Steam Cooling Systems and Hybrid Cooling. Andrew G. Howell Xcel Energy

IMPROVE LUMBER DRYING PROGRAM

AP1000 European 15. Accident Analysis Design Control Document

Transcription:

Condensate Line Sizing for Gravity Returns from Steam Traps and Heat Recovery With efficient energy use being important to all users of steam, maximizing the recovery of heat is of utmost importance. In the past, energy costs were low, water resources were plentiful, and carbon emissions had not yet become an issue. These economic and environmental aspects made dumping condensate an acceptable practice. Now, with present-day conditions, dumping condensate is a far less justifiable option. Most cities implement a maximum allowable effluent temperature (typically 140 F). As such, condensate cannot be dumped directly into sewer lines. This maximum condensate temperature ensures that any water reaching the sewer treatment plant will not kill bacteria beds that are necessary for the treatment process. Therefore, in order to dump hot condensate, cooling water must be added until the temperature is below the maximum allowed by the public sewage authorities. This cooling process can be costly and impractical, particularly if direct water injection is used. In some cases, where there is no condensate return capability (such as with district steam systems or where contamination may be an issue), heat exchangers or condensate coolers can be used to recover heat from the condensate and flash steam to maximize energy efficiency. High pressure condensate s flash steam can also be recovered and supplied to a lower pressure steam system. Such flash recovery is accomplished by using a flash vessel and associated controls to separate condensate and flash steam, diverting the flash steam into a lower pressure steam header or usage point. In some cases, condensate collected from a high pressure steam main is discharged into the low pressure steam main, but this practice is not recommended as it increases the condensate load in the lower pressure system. Such cascading of condensate into a low pressure steam system increases liquid mass which can increase difficulties of a water hammer condition, while simultaneously increasing the recipient steam s wetness. Two main considerations of sizing condensate lines are to reduce backpressure and line velocity for several reasons, including to avoid water hammer and high system back pressure that restricts production capability. Furthermore, it is recommended that consistent checking of each steam trap s condition is sustained with appropriate maintenance action of faulty traps to prevent condensate return line over pressurization from leaking steam. Excess steam in the condensate header also increases the chances of steam pocket collapse, which can lead to steam-induced water hammer conditions. Condensate Return Line Sizing Condensate lines from steam trap discharges have to carry both liquid and flash steam together through the piping. Proper sizing of the condensate return lines is important to ensure the safe and reliable transfer of this two-phase flow to the recovery system. The pipe on the discharge side of the steam trap should never be smaller than the outlet connection on the trap. 5/12/16 Page 1 of 7 This sheet is reviewed periodically and may be updated. Visit www.fluidcontrolsinstitute.org for the latest version.

Additionally, the size of the condensate return line should generally be larger than the steam trap discharge pipe. In a gravity return, the condensate will run along the bottom of the piping while the flash steam travels above. It is important that the speed of the flowing mixture not be excessive. Excessive velocity in the return line can allow for water hammer due to slugs of liquid being pushed along the piping system. To size the condensate return line properly, you will need to know the following information: Steam pressure at steam trap inlet Amount of condensate #/hr. Pressure in the condensate return line (is the condensate going to a vented receiver, a pressurized flash tank, or a DA tank). Sensible heat of condensate at the steam trap inlet (See Table 1-1 based on the steam trap inlet pressure) Sensible heat of condensate return flow (see Table 1-1 for sensible heat based upon operating pressure of the condensate return line) Specific volume of flash steam flowing in the condensate return line (see steam table for specific volume of flash steam) Flash steam velocity 3,000 to 4,000 ft/min maximum Glossary of terms: L= latent heat BTU/lb (see Table 1.1, saturated steam latent heat value, adjust for wetness percent) Q= condensate generated, lb/hr. Qi = Incoming condensate flow, lb/hr. S= sensible heat in BTU/lb. Sh = sensible heat, higher pressure (BTU/lb) Sl = sensible heat, lower pressure (BTU/lb) Ll = latent heat of lower pressure (BTU/lb) FS = flash steam (lb/hr) Q = condensate generated ( lb/hr) Sv = specific volume of steam (cu ft/lb) Pa = pipe area required (sq inches) Svel = steam velocity (ft/min) 5/12/16 Page 2 of 7 This sheet is reviewed periodically and may be updated. Visit www.fluidcontrolsinstitute.org for the latest version.

Formulas: Note: For any formula requiring latent heat (L, Ll, or sensible heat (S, Sh, Sl) use Table 1-1. To calculate amount of flash steam % use the following formula: (Sh Sl) / Ll= flash steam % Example: 100 psig condensate flowing through steam trap to a 0 psig gravity return Sh of 100 psig condensate = 309 btu/lb Sl of 0 psig condensate = 180 btu/lb Ll of 0 psig condensate = 970 btu/lb Flash steam % = (309-180) / 970 = 0.133 or 13.3% To determine the amount of flash steam (lb/hr) using following formula: FS= Q X FS% = total flash steam Formula to calculate required pipe area: Pa = (((2.4 X FS X Sv) / Svel) = area required for flash steam ((Q- FS) X 0.016) / (FS*Sv) = % of pipe area in square inches for condensate (Pa for flash flow) x (1 + % of pipe area) = total pipe required Example 1: 100 psig condensate flowing through steam trap at 5,000 lb/hr to a 0 psig gravity return, schedule 40 pipe Fs= 5,000 X 0.132 = 660 lb/hr Condensate flow = 5,000 lb/hr - 660 lb/hr = 4340 lb/hr condensate in 0 psig gravity return Pa = (2.4 X 660 X 26.8) / 3,000 = 14.15 sq. inch. area required for flash steam (5000-660) X 0.0160 / (660 X 26.8) = 0.0039 or 0.39% of pipe area for condensate Total pipe required = 14.15 x (1 + 0.0039) = 14.2 sq inch 5/12/16 Page 3 of 7 This sheet is reviewed periodically and may be updated. Visit www.fluidcontrolsinstitute.org for the latest version.

To choose required pipe size see table 1-2 The required need for a 14.2 sq inch internal pipe area would require a 5 (realistically a 6 ) schedule 40 pipe to maintain a flow velocity below 3000 Ft/min. Alternatively, using the Pa formula to solve for Svel if using a 4 schedule 40 pipe with internal area of 12.73 Sq. In.; 12.73 / (1 + 0.0039) = 12.68 sq inch Svel (4 ) = (2.4 X 660 X 26.8) / 12.68) = 3,348 ft/min Example 2: 200 psig condensate flowing through steam trap at 15,000 lb/hr to a 30 psig flash tank, gravity return, schedule 80 pipe Flash steam % = (362-243) / 929 = 0.128 or 12.8% Fs = 15,000 X 0.128 = 1920 lb/hr Condensate flow = 15,000 lb/hr - 1920 lb/hr = 13,080 lb/hr condensate in 30 psig gravity return Pa = (2.4 X 1920 X 26.8) / 3000 = 41.16 sq inch for flash steam (15000-1920) X 0.0160 / (660 X 26.8) = 0.012 or 1.2% of pipe area for condensate Total pipe required = 41.16 x (1 + 0.012) = 41.65 sq inch To choose required pipe size see table 1-2 The required need for a 41.65 sq inch internal pipe area would require an 8 schedule 80 pipe to maintain a flow velocity below 3000 Ft/min. Example 3: Multiple condensate sources flowing to a 5 psig DA tank schedule 80 pipe A. 200 psig 5,000 lb/hr B. 150 psig 7,500 lb/hr C. 50 psig 10,000 lb/hr 5/12/16 Page 4 of 7 This sheet is reviewed periodically and may be updated. Visit www.fluidcontrolsinstitute.org for the latest version.

Flash steam % @ 200 psig= (362-195) / 960 = 0.174 or 17.4% Fs @ 200 psig = 5,000 X 0.174 = 870 lb/hr Flash steam % @ 150 psig= (339-195) / 960 = 0.15 or 15.0% Fs @ 150 psig = 7,500 X.15 = 1,125 lb/hr Flash steam % @ 50 psig = (267-195) / 960 = 0.075 or 7.5% Fs @ 50 psig = 10,000 X.075 = 750 lb/hr Total flash steam = 870 + 1,125 + 750 = 2,745 lb/hr. Total condensate flow from traps = 5,000 + 7,500 + 10,000 = 22,500 lb/h. Condensate flow = 22,500 lb/hr - 2745 lb/hr = 19,755 lb/hr condensate in 5 psig gravity return Pa = (2.4 X 2,745 X 20.17) / 3000 = 44.29 sq inch for flash steam (22,500-2745) X 0.0160 / (2745 X 20.17) = 0.0057 or 0.57% of pipe area for condensate Total pipe required = 44.29 x (1 + 0.0042) = 44.54 sq inch To choose required pipe size see table 1-2 The required need for a 44.54 sq inch internal pipe area would require an 8 schedule 80 pipe to maintain a flow velocity below 3000 Ft/min. 5/12/16 Page 5 of 7 This sheet is reviewed periodically and may be updated. Visit www.fluidcontrolsinstitute.org for the latest version.

Pressure (psig) Latent heat Btu/lb Table 1-1 Latent Heat and Sensible Heat at Various Saturated Steam Pressures Sensible Specific Latent Sensible Specific Latent Pressure Pressure heat volume heat heat volume heat (psig) (psig) Btu/lb cu.ft./lb Btu/lb Btu/# cu.ft./lb Btu/ # Sensible heat Btu/# Specific volume cu.ft./lb 0 970 180 26.8 105 878 312 3.74 310 802 402 1.43 1 968 183 25.2 110 875 316 3.59 315 800 404 1.41 2 966 187 23.5 115 873 319 3.46 320 799 405 1.38 3 964 190 22.3 120 871 322 3.34 325 797 407 1.36 4 962 192 21.4 125 868 325 3.23 330 796 408 1.34 5 960 195 20.1 130 866 328 3.12 335 794 410 1.33 6 959 198 19.4 135 864 330 3.02 340 793 411 1.31 7 957 200 18.7 140 861 333 2.92 345 791 413 1.29 8 956 201 18.4 145 859 336 2.84 350 790 414 1.28 9 954 205 17.1 150 857 339 2.74 355 789 416 1.26 10 953 207 16.5 155 855 341 2.68 360 788 417 1.24 12 949 212 15.3 160 853 344 2.60 365 786 419 1.22 14 947 216 14.3 165 851 346 2.54 370 785 420 1.20 16 944 220 13.4 170 849 348 2.47 375 784 421 1.19 18 941 224 12.6 175 847 351 2.41 380 783 422 1.18 20 939 227 11.9 180 845 353 2.34 385 781 424 1.16 22 937 230 11.3 185 843 355 2.29 390 780 425 1.14 24 934 233 10.8 190 841 358 2.24 395 778 427 1.13 26 933 236 10.3 195 839 360 2.19 400 777 428 1.12 28 930 239 9.85 200 837 362 2.14 450 766 439 1.00 30 929 243 9.46 205 836 364 2.09 500 751 453.89 32 927 246 9.10 210 834 366 2.05 550 740 464.82 34 925 248 8.75 215 832 368 2.00 600 730 473.75 36 923 251 8.42 220 830 370 1.96 650 719 483.69 38 922 253 8.08 225 828 372 1.92 700 710 491.64 40 920 256 7.82 230 827 374 1.89 750 696 504.60 42 918 258 7.57 235 825 376 1.85 800 686 512.56 44 917 260 7.31 240 823 378 1.81 900 666 529.49 46 915 262 7.14 245 822 380 1.78 1000 647 544.44 48 914 264 6.94 250 820 382 1.75 1250 600 580.34 50 912 267 6.68 255 819 383 1.72 1500 557 610.23 55 909 271 6.27 260 817 385 1.69 1750 509 642.22 60 906 277 5.84 265 815 387 1.66 2000 462 672.19 65 901 282 5.49 270 814 389 1.63 2250 413 701.16 70 898 286 5.18 275 812 391 1.60 2500 358 733.13 75 895 290 4.91 280 811 392 1.57 2750 295 764.11 5/12/16 Page 6 of 7 This sheet is reviewed periodically and may be updated. Visit www.fluidcontrolsinstitute.org for the latest version.

80 891 294 4.67 285 809 394 1.55 3000 213 804.08 85 889 298 4.44 290 808 395 1.53 90 886 302 4.24 295 806 397 1.49 95 883 305 4.05 300 805 398 1.47 100 880 309 3.89 305 803 400 1.45 Table 1-2 - Internal Square Inches of Schedule 40 and Schedule Steel Pipe Pipe size (inches) Schedule 40 pipe internal Sq. In. Schedule 80 pipe internal Sq. In. ½.304.234 ¾.533.433 1.864.719 1-1/4 1.495 1.283 1-1/2 2.036 1.767 2 3.355 2.953 2-1/2 4.788 4.238 3 7.393 6.605 4 12.73 11.497 5 20.00 18.194 6 28.89 26.067 8 50.02 45.663 10 78.85 71.84 12 111.9 101.64 14 135.3 122.72 16 176.7 160.92 18 224.0 204.24 20 278.0 252.72 24 402.1 365.22 5/12/16 Page 7 of 7 This sheet is reviewed periodically and may be updated. Visit www.fluidcontrolsinstitute.org for the latest version.