National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard. Dr. Craig Morris Deputy Administrator AMS Livestock, Poultry, and Seed Program

Similar documents
Genetically Engineered Foods

RE: Proposed Rule Questions Under Consideration for GMO Disclosure and Labeling

(Gives background and presents arguments for both sides) by P. Byrne, D. Pendell, & G. Graff* Quick Facts...

June 27, United States Senate Washington, D.C Re: GMO Labeling Bill - OPPOSE. Dear Senators,

WHOLE FOODS MARKET GMO Labeling Policy

H 5849 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

H. R IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

RESOLUTION # 3 LABELING OF FOODS WITH BIO-ENGINEERED INGREDIENTS

THE CALIFORNIA RIGHT TO KNOW GENETICALLY ENGINEERED FOOD ACT

Regulations and safety assessment for genetically modified foods and feeds in Taiwan

National Organic Coalition

NON GMO* Food, Feed and Seed Certification Program

Comparison of regulatory frameworks of Austria, Germany, France, and South Tyrol for GM free labelling of food products

Explanatory Memorandum: The Natural Mineral Water, Spring Water and Bottled Drinking Water (Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2010

AUSTRALIAN CERTIFIED NON-GMO STANDARD. Version 1.0, 2016, Australian Organic Limited

New breeding technologies in plant sciences

PRIOR NOTICE OF IMPORTED FOOD SHIPMENTS

ORDER NO * * * * * * * On December 11, 2001, the Public Service Commission ("Commission") issued

Guideline n 1: The ECOCERT SA NOP Certification System

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 HOUSE BILL 1778

The best quality assurance for meat and animal feed comes from the Netherlands

The Law Concerning Standardization, etc. of Agricultural and Forestry Products

Certified Non-GMO by AGW

Local Government Ethics Law. Opinions of the Office of the Attorney General

Regulation of New Plant Breeding Techniques in Canada and the United States

2016 Annual Meat Conference February 21-23, 2016 Nashville, Tennessee

Farmer s Market Legislation & Food Safety Regulations

All Regional Directors Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

FDA s Food Safety Modernization Act: An Overview

Regulatory Framework for Genetic Biocontrol

RE: Documentation Needed to Substantiate Animal Raising Claims for Label Submission

Final Version December 2015 STANDARD ON THE DEFINITION OF THE GMO-FREE PRODUCTION PROCESSES OF FOOD AND ITS LABELLING

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) & Imports of Food Products. August 9 th, 2016 Russell Statman, Registrar Corp

SHIPPING. 1.2 Infectious Substance: Substances which are known or are reasonably expected to contain pathogens

TITLE 16. BOARD OF REGISTERED ASTROLOGERS [Notice published January 6, 2012] NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

Checklist. For you who want to bring in or import products according to the KRAV standards chapter 16 (edition 2016)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 1 HOUSE BILL 366. Short Title: Retail Workers' Bill of Rights. (Public)

Review of FMMIS and DSS Assessment Project Procurement Divisions of Operations and Medicaid

Checklist. For verifying KRAV s extra requirements in the KRAV standards chapter 16 (edition 2018). Product type/production:...

To receive the $1 million prize, the successful candidate must be the first to do both of the following:

Final Version December STANDARD ON THE RISK-BASED CONTROL OF GMO-FREE PRODUCTION PROCESSES (Non GM Danube Region Inspection Standard)

The GMOs regulatory framework to be enforced in the EU

MOFGA Certification Services Record Keeping Crop Example Forms

MEMORANDUM. I. States Have the Right to Require Food Labeling

The Proposed Safe Food for Canadians Regulations (SFCR) Information Session

RE: Voluntary Labeling Indicating Whether Foods Have or Have Not Been Derived From Genetically Engineered Plants; Guidance for Industry; Availability

NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS. Notice of Proposed Hearing and Opportunity to Comment

Ministry of Agriculture BRIEFING NOTE FOR MINISTER FOR INFORMATION

Coupon Redemption Policy

BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER

Supervisory Board Charter of the Audit Committee

Initiatives in fiscal 2015 and beyond

THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HAZARD COMMUNICATION POLICY

Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology in the United States: Overview

Dear Prospective Market Vendor,

USDA-APHIS Biotechnology Regulatory Services Janet L. Bucknall Associate Deputy Administrator

A Bill Regular Session, 2015 HOUSE BILL 1067

CANADA (HEALTH CANADA)

NEW YORK CITY HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION. Notice of Public Hearing and Opportunity to Comment on Proposed Rule

GMO 101 Workshop. February 10, 2016

How to deal with. the non gmo protein feed supply chain. in France? Péterdi Krisztina SOLTEAM 16/04/2015

W. R. GRACE & CO. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES

Protocol for Consultation with Trade Union Safety representatives.

Lobbyist and Gift Registry

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

The 2018 Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code & associated guidance

The USDA Organic Label for Pet Food and Livestock Feed Where are we Now, and Where are we Headed?

FDA FSMA Timeline. July 29, 2009 House version passed. Nov. 30, 2010 Senate version passed. Dec. 19, 2010 Senate revised version passed

2017 Archaeology Audit Program Procedure Manual. April 2017

Understanding Public Bid Law La. R.S. 38:

Fuji Electric. (Edition 5.0) Green Procurement Guideline. April Fuji Electric Co., Ltd.

PARLIAMENTARY TRANSPARENCY PLEDGE

Requirements for Industry PIF. Regional Training on Product Information File (PIF) Product Information File (PIF)

Key words: Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex); Committee on Food Labeling (CCFL); genetically modified (GM); international harmonization.

Best Buy Political Activity &

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

AUDITING EFFECTIVENESS OF OFFICIAL CONTROL SYSTEMS

New technologies and food labelling: the controversy over labelling of foods derived from genetically modified crops

Organic Foods: Understanding Organic Food Labels, Benefits, and Claims

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is issuing a final rule to establish

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0056. Sponsored by: Representative(s) Lindholm, Blake, Hunt and Kroeker and Senator(s) Driskill A BILL. for

Best Buy Political Activity & Government Relations Policy

closer look at Definitions The General Data Protection Regulation

S 0952 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Keywords: GMOs; biotechnology; labeling policy; trade disputes.

JUNE 14, 2017 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON THE CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FOR ISSUERS OF SECURITIES TO THE PUBLIC, 2015

Preemption and Alteration of EPA and State Authority to Regulate Greenhouse Gases in the Kerry-Lieberman Bill

Helping you keep our pets healthy and active

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFIED FARMERS MARKETS September, 1997 revised June, 1999

Appendix A Historical Background

Canada / U.S. Organic Equivalence 12:15-1:30 P.M. Moderator: MATTHEW HOLMES Executive Director, Canada OTA

WORKPLACE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION SYSTEM (WHMIS)

Education Fund. A Year of Progress: More Choices and More Information on GMOs

The Food Safety Modernization Act: What Exporters to the U.S. Need to Know. Erik R. Lieberman Prepared for AgroBalt 2014 April 4, 2014

Non-GMO Project Product Verification Guide

CITIZEN PETITION. June 26, Tom Vilsack Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture 1400 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20250

Title. Revision 00. Date Preparation Approval Authorisatio Application date. Director of Department Directive Council President

EU Food Law. protect public health (human, animal and plant);

Introducing a certification mark for Karoo Lamb

A Look into New Texas Conduct and Disclosure Requirements

Transcription:

National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard Dr. Craig Morris Deputy Administrator AMS Livestock, Poultry, and Seed Program

The legislation amends the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to address the following: 1. Definition of bioengineered food. 2. Preemption of state food labeling standards. 3. Creation of federal mandatory disclosure standard. 4. Choice of disclosure. 5. Exclusions. 6. Small food manufacturers. 7. Food safety implications. 8. Organically produced foods. 9. Enforcement.

USDA Structure

Why AMS?

Definition of bioengineered food Food intended for human consumption that contains genetic material that has been modified through in vitro recombinant DNA techniques and for which the modification could not otherwise be obtained through conventional breeding or found in nature. The Secretary of Agriculture shall determine the amount of bioengineered substance necessary to deem the food as bioengineered.

Definition of bioengineered food A food that is derived from an animal that consumed feed containing bioengineered substances shall not be considered bioengineered because of the feed. Thus, meat, poultry, and eggs products from animals that have consumed GMO feed will not be subject to the labeling requirements simply because of the feed.

Preemption of state food labeling standards No state or political subdivision may establish requirements for labeling whether a food or seed is bioengineered or contains ingredients that are bioengineered. A state may adopt a disclosure standard that is identical to the federal standard. A food may bear disclosure of bioengineering only in accordance with federal regulations arising from this law.

Vermont Labeling Law

Creation of federal mandatory disclosure standard Within two years of the bill s enactment, the Secretary of Agriculture must establish a mandatory national bioengineered food disclosure standard and the procedures necessary to implement the national standard.

Choice of disclosure The federal standard must give a manufacturer the option of disclosing information with on-package text, a symbol or an electronic or digital link, such as a QR code. An electronic or digital link must contain access to an internet website or other type of electronic source.

Electronic or Digital Disclosure Study The USDA must conduct a study to identify potential technological challenges of disclosure through electronic or digital means, and must provide additional options if determined that the proposed technological options do not provide sufficient access to bioengineered food disclosure information. Published a Request for Information (RFI) from Sept 1-15 and received 7 comments on study design and 1 vendor inquiry. Request for Proposal to be published on October 19, with proposal due on November 22.

Exclusions The following are excluded from the national disclosure standard: Food served in a restaurant or similar retail food establishment. Very small food manufacturers, to be defined through rulemaking. As explained earlier, meat, poultry, and egg products from animals that consume GMO feed. A food containing meat, poultry or eggs if the predominant ingredient would not independently be subject to Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) food labeling requirements, or if the predominant ingredient is broth, stock, water or a similar solution and the second-most predominant ingredient would not independently be subject to FFDCA food labeling requirements.

Small food manufacturers The USDA must define small food manufacturers and provide such manufacturers with a grace period of at least one year for implementation of the new standards and the additional option of providing only a telephone number or internet website on a food label to disclose required information.

Food safety implications Bioengineered foods that successfully complete the premarket Federal regulatory review process shall not be treated as more or less safe than non-bioengineered counterparts because of bioengineering.

Organically produced foods A food certified as organic under the national organic program may be labeled as not bioengineered, non- GMO or with similar language.

Enforcement Failing to disclose a food as bioengineered is a prohibited act. The USDA Secretary will have authority to request records and conduct audits and hearings in regards to compliance and will not have recall authority for a food that does not comply with disclosure regulations.

Secretary has established an inter-agency working group that includes the agencies needed to stand up this program. Public engagement: Where are we now? GMOLabeling@ams.usda.gov Received over 500 comments, questions, and concerns www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/gmo Email updates over 900 stakeholders have signed up Electronic or Digital Disclosure Study Request for Proposal being drafted

What s Next? Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Electronic Disclosure Study July 2017 Proposed Rule Final Rule July 2018

Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking AMS analyzed the Law and identified areas of discretion Includes 30+ issues for public comment Provides AMS current thinking on each issue Currently scheduled for publication by end of 2016 Public listening sessions in conjunction with ANPR publication

Advanced Notice of Proposed Issues include Rulemaking Definition of bioengineered food (what is conventional breeding or found in nature, are highly-refined food products like oils and sugars bioengineered) Amount of bioengineered substance needed for a food to be considered bioengineered (threshold) Text and symbol requirements Non-compliance investigations and enforcement processes