Document Separator DSO00. Document ID Number

Similar documents
Letter Health Consultation

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Receive Site Fact Sheets by . See For More Information to Learn How.

HEALTH CONSULTATION. Private Residence. Wickenburg, AZ Maricopa County. August 25, 1999

Fairchild Air Force Base Atlas E Missile Site Sprague, Lincoln County, Washington

Health Assessment Section

Southeast Hennepin Groundwater and Vapor Intrusion Site

November 8, 2016 International Petroleum Environmental Conference. Tim Nickels Pastor, Behling & Wheeler, LLC

A REVIEW OF VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE BY STATE

In situ Remediation of 1,4-Dioxane using Electrical Resistance Heating

Best management practices for vapor investigation and building mitigation decisions

SITE REVIEW AND UPDATE ROCKY HILL MUNICIPAL WELLS ROCKY HILL BOROUGH, SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY CERCLIS NO. NJD

MEMORANDUM. To: Billy Meyer. Christie Zawtocki, PE Timothy Klotz. Date: April 8, 2014

BACKGROUND OFFSITE FACILITIES/RELEASE CASES

Soil Vapor Migration Through Subsurface Utilities

March 16, Dear Mr. Chapman:

INTRODUCTION. 1 Proposed Plan for the Former Lee Field Naval Air Station Landfill Area 2 Site

September 20, 2015 PN:

EPA s Final Vapor Intrusion Guidance

Appendix A 2014 Non-Continuous Pollutant Measurements

SITE REVIEW AND UPDATE DOVER MUNICIPAL WELL 4 DOVER TOWNSHIP, MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY CERCLIS NO. NJD

Continental Aluminum Exposure Investigation Executive Summary

Use of Crawl Space Sampling Data and Other Lines of Evidence for Evaluating Vapor Intrusion

Tonawanda Community Air Quality Study

Proposed Changes to EPA s Spreadsheet Version of Johnson & Ettinger Model (and some new spreadsheet tools)

H&H Job No. DS0-05. April 29, South Tryon Street Suite 100 Charlotte, NC

PROPOSED DECISION DOCUMENT. CE - E. 19th St. Station Voluntary Cleanup Program New York, New York County Site No. V00542 October 2017

Abstract. Thomas R. Eschner and David Dinsmore, Woodard & Curran.

G37C1100LQTT CEMWIPE NEUTRAL GLAZE BASE. Surface Preparation or Protection

Air Pollution in NJ: Past,Present and thoughts about the Future

Re: Casey Middle School at 1301 High Street in Boulder, Colorado Follow-Up Indoor Air Quality Monitoring (Hydrogen Sulfide)

COMPARISON OF KINETICS FOR REMOVAL OF BTEX COMPOUNDS AND CHLORINATED SOLVENTS USING ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESSES

Oregon Guidance for Assessing and Remediating Vapor Intrusion in Buildings

Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. For More Information

Risk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup

Is this the maturation Phase of Vapor Intrusion Investigations?

ECSI Number: Responsible Party: Klamath County. QTime Number: Entry Date: 9/22/04 (VCP)

ISOTEC Case Study No. 67 ISCO TREATMENT PROGRAM: IMPACTED GROUNDWATER TREATMENT UTILIZING ACTIVATED SODIUM PERSULFATE

OPTIMIZATION OF A CHEMICAL OXIDATION TREATMENT TRAIN PROCESS FOR GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION. Gary Cronk, P.E., CHMM

Petroleum Remediation Program Consultants Day Agenda May 24, 2017

SITE DESCRIPTION CHEMICAL COMMODITIES, INC. KANSAS EPA ID# KSD EPA Region 7 City: Olathe County: Johnson County Other Names:

GROUNDWATER INFORMATION SHEET. Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)

7.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES

Soil Vapor Reproducibility: An Analytical and Sampling Perspective

Union Pacific Railyard City of Eugene, Lane County, Oregon

4.12 AIR QUALITY INTRODUCTION

Brownfield Program in California

Health Consultation. South Indian Bend Wash Landfill Area TEMPE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA. CERCLIS No. AZD

Vapour Intrusion Regulatory Framework and Case Law Review

NJDEP Vapor Intrusion Guidance

General Mills/Henkel Corp. Superfund Site Five-Year Review. Table of Contents

Arkansas Department of Health

ISSN: X Impact factor: (Volume3, Issue4) Available online at Analysis of Air Pollution

6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS COMPLIANCE STATUS TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

VERMONT USED OIL ANALYSIS AND WASTE OIL FURNACE EMISSIONS STUDY

Passive Gas Environmental Site Assessment and Monitoring

Comparison of indoor air quality on a passenger ship and a chemical ship

Air quality in the vicinity of a governmental school in Kuwait

FINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION

Have You Caught a Case of the Vapors?

Hazardous Materials December 9, Hazardous Materials Existing Conditions

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup

Executive Summary. 2. Property Investigations Groundwater Sampling Soil Sampling Soil Vapor Sampling 5

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. Contaminated Sites Database

Cost Estimate for Removal and Disposal of Contaminated Soil

Draft Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Information Paper. Michael Lowry, RTI International Matthew Young, EPA OUST

Emissions from Residential Wood Combustion: Activity Data Survey and Results

MEMO. Kris Hinskey

City of Palo Alto (ID # 7047) City Council Staff Report

DuPont Pompton Lakes Works Contaminated Sites/Neighborhoods Pompton Lakes, New Jersey

Metropolitan Transit. Prepared for. Original Submittal: May 28, Resubmitted: November 10, 2010 January 21, aq5-28

Dayton Bar Association

Soil Cleanup Goals. Minnesota Department of Agriculture Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division. Guidance Document 19

Charles Sarnoski Delaware Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Control Division of Air Quality

Technology Overview KLOZUR PERSULFATE

Evaluation of Spatial and Temporal Variability in VOC Concentrations at Vapor Intrusion Investigation Sites.

City: WAITE PARK WAITE PARK WELLS. Site Information: Record of Decision (ROD): WAITE PARK WELLS WAITE PARK, MN. Site Name: Address:

1. What is the cleanup level look-up table and where can I find it?

PCBs in Building Materials. John Gorman Jim Haklar USEPA

ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Consulting & Management

EVALUATION OF OZONE IMPACTS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND CHLORINE

OSWER DIRECTIVE Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions

CHAPTER 2 - Air Quality Trends and Comparisons

SITE REVIEW AND UPDATE NASCOLITE CORPORATION MILLVILLE AND VINELAND, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NEW JERSEY CERCLIS NO. NJD

Determining the Influence of Background Sources on Indoor Air Concentrations in Vapor Intrusion Assessment

A Clean, Green Remediation

Implementation of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS): Opportunities for Public Participation

ANALYSIS OF INDOOR AIR QUALITY IN HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PASSENGER CABIN IN KOREA

ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION No. 153 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED APRIL 5, 2018

FINAL. Second Five-Year Review Report Volume II Attachments. St Louis River/Interlake/Duluth Tar Site Tar Seep OU - EPA OU 01 Soil OU EPA OU-3

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Updates on Proposed Guidance/Technical Bulletins and Technical Standards

KEX Tire Repair Materials. Product #: 62Y. SDS #: RTT-KX-012 Rev. # 4 Rev. Date: 2/08/2017

PermeOx. Plus. Enhanced Aerobic Biodegradation

Example Application of Long Term Stewardship for the Chlorinated Vapor Intrusion Pathway (and VOC sources)

Background Ozone Levels

Vapor Intrusion: A State s Perspective

S-ISCO REMEDIATION OF COAL TAR

TITLE V OPERATING PERMIT STATEMENT OF BASIS

SITE REVIEW AND UPDATE FRIED INDUSTRIES EAST BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP MIDDLESEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY CERCLIS NO. NJD

Transcription:

Document Separator DSO00 Document ID Number 38970

Page 1 of I Aimee Zack From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Nichols, Andrew (MPCA) [Andrew.Nichols@state,mn.us] Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:50 PM jevondracek@ashland,com; LeeAnn Thomas; steve_finn@golder,com; shelgen@geomega,com ; Shoreham Area Advisory Committee Jolley, Rick (MPCA); Villas-Horns, Cathy (MDA); Messing, Rita (MDH); Pena, Daniel (MDH); Anderson, Robert (MDA) Final Letter Health Consultation for 1-3-butadiene along Central Avenue Attachments: Final Letter Health Consultation 1-3-butadiene,pdf Ladies and Gentlemen, Attached, please find the version of the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Health Consultation that was recently sent to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions. Regards, Andrew Andrew Nichols Project Manager Voluntary Investigation & Cleanup Program Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road St, Paul, MN 55155 (651) 757-2612 (651) 296-9707 (Fax) ~ d r~w,)3 i~ h ~1~@ ~t~ te,.i :n n. u s MPCA VIC Web Site: ~_tt_p:llwww.pca.state.mn.uslcleanuplvic.html 7/3 0/2 010

Letter Health Consultation 1, 3-Butadiene Concentrations Along Central Avenue In Northeast Minneapolis Prepared by the Minnesota Department of Health June 2010 Prepared under a Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH A HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Atlanta, Georgia 30333

Health Consultation: A Note of Explanation A health consultation is a verbal or written response from ATSDR or one of ATSDR s Cooperative Agreement Partners (in this case the Minnesota Department of Health; MDH) to a specific request for information about health risks related to a specific site, a chemical release, or the presence of hazardous material. In order to prevent or mitigate exposures, a consultation may lead to specific actions, such as restricting use of or replacing water supplies; intensifying environmental sampling; restricting site access; or removing the contaminated material. In addition, consultations may recommend additional public health actions, such as conducting health surveillance activities to evaluate exposure or trends in adverse health outcomes; conducting biological indicators of exposure studies to assess exposure; and providing health education for hea~th care providers and community members. This document conc~uc~es the hea~th consultation process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR or MDH which, in the Agency s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued./fyou have questions or comments about this report, we encourage you to contact us. Please write to. Community Relations Coordinator Site Assessment and Consultation Unit Minnesota Department of Health 625 North Robert Street PO Box 64975 St. Paul, MN 55164-0975 OR call us at." On the web." (651) 201-4897 orl-800-657-3908 (toll free call - press "4" on your touch tone phone) http://www.health.state.mn.usldivslehlhazardous/index.html You May Contact ATSDR Toll Free at 1-800-CDC-INFO or Visit our Home Page at: http://www.atsd r.cdc.gov

DEPARTMEHToFHEALTH May 26, 2010 Rick Jolley Hydrogeologist Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Unit VIC and Emergency Response Section Remediation Division Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Dear Mr. Jolley: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) reviewed the analytical data you provided from the 1, 3-butadiene soil vapor investigation in the city of Minneapolis on the east side of Central Avenue at the 2900 block across from the Former Ashland Lease Area (FALA) in the Soo Line Shoreham Yard site (VIC Site 5080). MDH has concluded that the 1, 3-butadiene soil vapor concentrations are not a current health concern. The MPCA 1, 3-butadiene residential Intrusion Screening Value (ISV) for 1, 3-butadiene is 0.3 micrograms per cubic meter (pg/m3)(3). This value is equal to the MDH Health Based Value (HBV) for 1,3-butadiene (a known carcinogen). The HBV is a criterion that MDH uses to evaluate exposures to the general public. For carcinogens, the HBV is unlikely to cause an incremental cancer risk greater than 1 additional case in 100,000 people exposed for a lifetime. If soil vapor concentrations are not consistently or significantly greater than 10 times the ISV (3.0 pg/m 3) the vapors are not considered by MDH to be a possible health concern because air concentrations are likely much lower than soil vapor concentrations. In other words, the soil vapor gas concentration must be consistently greater than 10 times the ISV (10X-ISV) before a potential threat to indoor air is evaluated. Table 1 lists the 1, 3-butadiene soil concentrations, end Figure 1 illustrates the sample locations. Possible Sources of 1, 3-butadiene There are numerous potential 1,3-butadiene sources in an urban environment including, but not limited to: o Vehicle exhaust o Burning of rubber and plastic o Tobacco smoke o Petroleum releases o Wood burning o Manufacturing release A gas station is located on the north end of the site and several businesses on the south side appear to service vehicles. Central Avenue, on the east side of the site, is a major traffic route that

includes public bus transportation. Automobile exhaust is a constant source of 1, 3-butadiene release to the atmosphere. 1, 3-Butadiene was measured in the exhaust of typical automobiles and light trucks using both winter and summer gasoline formulations and accounted for up to 0.12% of total hydrocarbon emissions (1). The average amount of 1, 3-butadiena in the air is between 0.4 to 1 part of 1, 3-butadiene per billion parts of air (ppb) in cities and suburban areas (~). 1,3-Butadiene is highly volatile; therefore, it partitions predominantly to the atmosphere. In the atmosphere, 1,3-butadiene undergoes rapid destruction, primarily by photochemical reactions. The reaction with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals has a calculated half-life of approximately 6 hours and is the dominant pathway for atmospheric removal (1). Although 1, 3- butadiene undergoes rapid photo-oxidation in the atmosphere, it is almost always present at low concentrations in urban and suburban areas. Petroleum Contaminants in Samples The following petroleum chemical constituents were also indentified in the 2007-8 soil vapor samples: o Ethanol o Ethyl-benzene o Benzene o Xylenes (total) o Toluene Tables 2 and 3 list the petroleum contaminant concentrations identified in soil gas as part of the vapor intrusion investigation east of Central Avenue. None of the petroleum contaminant concentrations exceeded their respective 10 times the Intrusion Screening Value (10X-ISVs) and therefore are not likely to be an indoor health risk. Petroleum constituent concentrations were not reported in the fall 2009 sampling event. Chlorinated Solvents in Samples Soil gas sampling was conducted in 2007 along Central Avenue on the west side of the commercial buildings. Follow-up sampling conducted in 2008 was expanded to the east to include the alley. Chlorinated solvent compounds that exceeded their soil gas screening values in 2007 included trichloroethene (TCE) and tetrachloroethene (PCE). The suspected source for the chlorinated solvent concentrations in soil gas is the adjacent voluntary investigation and cleanup (VIC) Site 5080. The samples in 2008 confirmed that the chlorinated solvents were not detected in soil gas on the east side of the commercial buildings in the alley and that TCE was still detected above its soil gas screening value but at lower concentrations than in 2007. PCE was no longer a compound of concern. The following Chlorinated Solvents were indentified in the 2007-8 soil vapor samples: o 1,1,1-trichloroethane o Tetrachloroethene (PCE) o Trichloroethene (TCE) o 1,3- dichlorobenzene Tables 4, 5, and 6 list the chlorinated solvent concentrations identified at the site. The TCE residential ISV screening value of 30 pg/m3 (10X-iSV) was exceeded in samples VP07-3, VP07-4, VP07-5, VP08-12, VP09-01, and VP09-02. The 2009 sample event included two soil gas

samples. Samples VP09-01 and VP09-02 had TCE concentrations of 30 and 220 IJg/m3 respectively (see Figure 1 for sample locations). Because, the land use along Central Avenue is commercial/industrial results were also compared to commercial/industrial ISVs. The TCE commercial/industrial ISV is 8 IJg/m 3. If the TCE soil vapor concentrations range between 80 and 800 pg/m3 (10x-ISV and 100x-ISV respectively), additional monitoring is warranted. The 2 soil vapor samples collected in 2009 do not sufficiently characterize the southern part of the plume where TCE and PCE concentrations were elevated in 2008 (see Table 5, samples VP08-10, and VP08-12). Conclusions It appears that a mixed plume of petroleum and chlorinated solvents is present in the study area. There are a number of potential sources for these contaminants along Central Avenue. Low levels of 1,3-butadiene, petroleum contaminants, and chlorinated solvents were found in soil vapor samples in the study area. Levels of 1,3-butadiene, petroleum contaminants, and chlorinated solvents are not expected to add significantly to urban background levels in ambient air. The current soil vapor contaminant concentrations are not expected to harm people s health. However, some detections of TCE above residential and commercial/industrial screening values were noted. Recommendations Additional soil vapor gas monitoring for chlorinated solvents and petroleum constituents is recommended along Central Avenue east of the FALA extraction system. The following contaminants should be included: o Ethano~ o Ethyl-benzene o Tetrachloroethene o Benzene o Xylenes (total) o Trichloroethene (TCE) Toluene o 1,3-butadiene o 1,1,1-trichloroethane MDH will assist the MPCA in communicating these findings to the public as needed. Daniel PeSa, M.S. Environmental Research Scientist Minnesota Department of Health Site Assessment & Consultation Unit 651-215-4920 phone 651-215-4606 fax daniel.pena@state.mn.us

Table 1 1, 3-Butadiene In North Side Samples 1,3-Butadiene VP08-02 VP08-03 1,3-Butadiene (pg/m3 I VP08-01 VP-08-04 VP07-01 VP07-02 12 VP09-03 VP-08-05 8.1 4.9 1, 3-Butadiene In South Side Samples VP08-12 VP09-01 VP07-03 VP09-02 VP07-04 VP08-11 VP08-11 D VP07-05 VP07-06 VP07-06 D 1,3-Butadiene Ip~l/m 2.3 NO 4.8 2.2 2.4. :3.8 3.1 VP09-04 VP09-04 D VP08-06 VP09-05 VP08-07 VP09-06 VP08-08 1,3-Butadiene Ipfl/m3) "1.7 4.5 2.1 4.2 2.3 VP08-10 4,4 VP08-09 4.5 VP07 = Sampled in 2007; VP08 = Sampled in 2008; VP09 = Sampled in 2009 D = Duplicate Sample; = Not Detected Bold: > 10x 1,3-Butadiene Residential Intrusion Screening Value (0.3pg/m 3)

Table 2 2007 Petroleum Constituents Samples Petroleum Compounds Petroleum Compounds (t~ 1/m3) qj 1/m3) Ethanol 10 Benzene 19 VP07-01 Toluene 160 Not sampled Ethyl-benzene 30 Xylenes (total) 156 Volatile Petroleum Chemicals In South Side Samples Petroleum Compounds (~g/m3) VP07-02 Ethanol Benzene Toluene Ethyl-benzene Xylenes (total) NO Not sampled Petroleum Compounds (H~l/m3) VP07-03 VP07-04 VP07-05 VP07-06 Ethanol 7.7 Benzene 12 Toluene 110 Ethyl-benzene 20 Xylenes (total) 109 Ethanol Benzene 12 Toluene Ethyl-benzene 110 19 Xylenes (total) 97 Ethanol 15 Benzene 14 Toluene 120 Ethyl-benzene 103 Xylenes(total) 215 Ethanol 7.5 Benzene 8.4 Toluene 34 Ethyl-benzene 15 Xylenes (total) 34 Not sampled Not sampled Not sampled Not sampled 10x Intrusion Screening Values (#g/m 3) Ethanol= 150,000; Benzene= 45; Toluene= 50,000; Ethy-benzene= 10,000; Xylenes= 1000 VP07 = Sampled in 2007; = Not Detected; Xylenes (total)= m,p, and o-xylene

Table 3 VP08-02 VP08-01 Central VP08-12 VP08-11 VP08-10 2008 Petroleum Constituents Samples North Side Samples Petroleum Compounds (t~l/ma) Ethanol 720 Benzene Toluene 70 Ethyl-benzene 33 Xylenes (total) 152 Ethanol 1000 Benzene Toluene 71 Ethyl-benzene 26 Xylenes (total) 122 VP08-03 VP-08-04 VP-08-05 South Side Samples Ave Samples Petroleum Compounds Ethanol Benzene Toluene Ethyl-benzene Xylenes (total) Ethanol Benzene Toluene Ethyl-benzene Xylenes (total) Ethanol Benzene Toluene Ethyl-benzene Xylenes (total) 110 4.3 61 5O 226 92 3.8 51 38 171 760 8.2 120 64 276 Alley VP08-06 VP08-07 VP08-08 VP08-09 Petroleum Compounds (p,~/m3) Ethanol 2000 Benzene 17 Toluene 190 Ethyl-benzene 52 Xylenes (total) 207 Ethanol 1200 Benzene 7.9 Toluene 140 Ethyl-benzene 44 X~,lenes {total) 183 Ethanol 1000 Benzene 8.3 Toluene 120 Ethyl-benzene 45 Xy~enes~tota~) 170 Xylenas (total) 206 Ethanol 650 Benzene 7.5 Toluene 120 Ethyl-benzene 54 Xylenes (total) 28 Ethanol 1200 Benzene Toluene 120 Ethyl-benzene 28 Xylanea (total) 81 Ethanol 1000 Benzene 8.4 Toluene 150 Ethyl-benzene 55 X~/lenas (total / 215 10x Intrusion Screening Values (pg/m 3) Ethanol= 150,000; Benzene= 45; Toluene= 50,000; Ethy-benzene= 10,000; Xylenes= 1000 VP07 = Sampled in 2007; VP08 = Sampled in 2008; VP09 = Sampled in 2009 D = Duplicate Sample ; Xylenes (total)= m,p, and o-xylene; = Not Detected Samples Petroleum Compounds /pp/m~) Ethanol 840 Benzene 7.9 Toluene 120 Ethyl-benzene 48

Table 4 2007 Chlorinated Solvents Samples North Side Samples Petroleum Compounds (IJ~/m3) Petroleum Compounds VP07-01 1,1,1-trichloroethane 13 Trichloroethene (TCE) 7.8 Tetrachloroethene 8.7 Not sampled 1,3- dichlorobenzene Volatile Petroleum Chemicals In South Side Samples Petroleum Compounds Petroleum Compounds Sample- (pg/m 3) Location (pg/m3) 1,1,1-trichloroethane VP07-02 Trichloroethene (TCE) Tetrachloroethene Not sampled 1, 3- dichlorobenzene VP07-03 1,1,1-trichloroethane 65 Td(::hloroethefle (TCE) 510 Tetrachloroethene 44 Not sampled 1, 3- dichlorobenzene 1,1,1-trichloroethane 32 Tdchloroethene (TCE) 45 VP07-04 Tetrachloroethene 28 Not sampled 1,3- dichlorobenzene 1,1,1-trichloreethane 22 Tdchloroethene ( I"CE) 72 VP07-05 Tetrachloroethene 71 Not sampled 1, 3- dichlorobenzene 1,1,1-trichloroethane 5.2 Trichloroethene (TCE) 5.5 Net VP07-06 Tetrachloroethene 8.9 sampled 1, 3- dichlorobenzene 10x Residential Intrusion Screening Values (pg/m 3) 1,1,1-trichloroethane = 50,000; Trichloroethene (TCE) = 30; Tetrachloroethene = 200; 1~ 3- dichlorobenzene = not available VP07 = Sampled in 2007; = Not Sampled ; Xylenes (total) = m,p, and o-xylene Bold: >10x Residential Intrusion Screening Value

Table 5 2008 Soil Chlorinated Solvents Vapor Samples North Side Compounds (IJg/m 3) Samples Sample- Location Compounds (I.Ig/m 3) VP08-02 1, 3- dichlorobenzene 16 VP08-03 1, 3- dichlorobenzene 14 Trichloroethene VP08-01 16 1, 3- dichlorobenzene 12 VP-08-04 N VP-08-05 South Side Samples Compounds Compounds (~Jg/m 3) Sample- (l~g/m3) Location VP08-12 1,1,1-trichloroethane 6.5 Tdchloroethene (TOE) 110 Tetrachloroethene 12 VP08-06 1, 3- dichlorobenzene 8 VP08-11 Trichloroethene 4.9 VP08-07 VPD8-10 Tetrachioroethene (PCE) 190 1,3- dichlorobenzene 11 VP08-08 VP08-10 D Tetrachloroethene 180 1,3- dichlorobenzene 9 VP08-09 1, 3-dichlorobenzene 13 10x Residential Intrusion Screening Values (pg/m 3) 1,1,1-trichloroethane = 50,000; Trichloroethene (TCE) = 30; Tetrachloroethene = 200; 1, 3- dichlorobenzene = not available /P08 = Sampled in 2008; = Not Detected; D= Duplicate 3old: >10x Residential Intrusion Screening Value Exceedance

Table 6 2009 Soil Chlorinated Solvents Vapor Samples Compounds VP09-01 VP09-02 North Side Samples Trichloroethene Tetrachloroethene Tdchloroethene Tetrachloroethene 1,1,1 -trichloroethane Compounds!l~g/m3) 30 6,6 Not Sampled 220 28 Not Sampled 15 10x Residential Intrusion Screening Values (~Jg/m 3) 1,1,1-trichloroethane = 50,000; Trichloroethene (TCE) = 30; Tetrachloroethene = 200 VP09 = Sampled in 2009; Bold: >10x Residential Intrusion Screening Value Exceedance

Figure 1 1.3-Butadiene (ug/m3) Results 2007-2009

References 1. Agency For Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Toxicological Profile for 1,3-Butadiene. Draft for Public Comment Public Comment Period Ends on February 26, 2010. 2. Ashland Inc, 2008 Sampling Results and Screening Evaluation for Central Avenue East of the FALA, East Side Shoreham Yard (VIC Site 5080) Minneapolis, Minnesota, prepared by Geomega Inc. August 2008 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Risk-Based Guidance for the Vapor Intrusion Pathway (Superfund RCRA and Voluntary Cleanup Section), September 2008. 4. Ashland Inc, 2009 Sampling Results end Screening Evaluation for Central Avenue East of the FALA, East Side Shorehem Yard (VIC Site 5080) Minneapolis, Minnesota, prepared by Geomega Inc. July 2009