from Dr. Carl Hansen, National Institutes of Health Laboratory Animal Genetic Center, were kindly provided by Dr.

Similar documents
Mouse Strain Resistant to N-, B-, and NB-Tropic Murine Leukemia Viruses

INFECTIOUS MURINE TYPE-C VIRUSES RELEASED FROM HUMAN CANCER CELLS TRANSPLANTED INTO NUDE MICE

Ultracentrifugal Inoculation

Mapping and Mapping Populations

THE NUMBER OF GENES CONTROLLING THE RESPONSE OF CHICK EMBRYO CHORIOALLANTOIC MEMBRANES TO TUMOR INDUCTION BY ROUS SARCOMA VIRUS1

Hamster-Tropic Sarcomagenic and Nonsarcomagenic

How can innovation in regulatory science inform the regulatory process to facilitate the development of new vaccines?

CELLULAR REGULATION IN FRIEND VIRUS INDUCED ERYTHROLEUKEMIA Studies with Anemic Mice of Genotype SI/SI d*

Brief Det~nitive Report

DO NOT OPEN UNTIL TOLD TO START

Exam 1 Answers Biology 210 Sept. 20, 2006

Chapter 14: Mendel and the Gene Idea

VZV Replication Assays Samantha J. Griffiths * and Jürgen Haas

Interferon Immunosuppression: Mediation by a Suppressor

Requirement for a Functional int Product in Temperature Inductions of

BIOPHARMACEUTICAL PROCESS EVALUATED FOR VIRAL CLEARANCE

ch03 Student: If a phenotype is controlled by the genotypes at two different loci the interaction of these genes is called

Safe Operating Procedure

Biosafety and the NIH Guidelines

Bioware Brite Cell Line HepG2-Red-FLuc

Recombinant Leukemogenic Retroviruses in Mice

Roche Molecular Biochemicals Technical Note No. LC 10/2000

REGISTRATION DOCUMENT FOR RECOMBINANT DNA RESEARCH

IBC protocol Risk Assessment and Determination of NIH Guidelines

NIH Guidelines for rdna Research: Tutorial for Completing Penn s rdna Registration Document

A/A;b/b x a/a;b/b. The doubly heterozygous F1 progeny generally show a single phenotype, determined by the dominant alleles of the two genes.

Adding CRISPR to Your Bio-ARROW Protocol

Split-Operon Control of a Prophage Gene*

Tutorial for Completing Penn s r s DNA Registration Document

Chp 10 Patterns of Inheritance

Adeno-X Rapid Titer Kit

Platinum Retrovirus Expression System, Ecotropic

Retinoic acid (vitamin A acid) induced transcriptional control

Understanding the Use of Bioassays in a Biomanufacturing Facility. Bernardo E. Cáceres Associate Principal Scientist Biotech Development

Overview. Models in laboratory research. The unique position of the mouse as a model. Mouse genetics 101. Genetic engineering for hypothesis testing

SYNTHESIS OF SV40 TUMOR ANTIGEN DURING REPLICATION. complement-fixing antigen in the transformed cells.1 Antibodies also develop for

MMG 301, Lec. 25 Mutations and Bacteriophage

Linkage & Genetic Mapping in Eukaryotes. Ch. 6

ViraDuctin Lentivirus Transduction Kit

Mendel and the Gene Idea

Melton, D.W. (1994) Gene targeting in the mouse. Bioessays 16:633-8

TransIT -mrna Transfection Kit

Fate of Viral RNA of Murine Leukemia Virus after Infection

Population Dynamics. Population: all the individuals of a species that live together in an area

1a. What is the ratio of feathered to unfeathered shanks in the offspring of the above cross?

Heredity and DNA Assignment 1

Convoy TM Transfection Reagent

CHAPTER 14 Genetics and Propagation

Genetics of dairy production

Genetics Culminating Project

COMPUTER SIMULATIONS AND PROBLEMS

Biol 1408 : Chapter 9 Patterns of Inheritance

Drosophila pseudoobscura

Biosafety Level Host Range Propagation Comments

Trasposable elements: Uses of P elements Problem set B at the end

Chapter 14: Mendel and the Gene Idea

DANIEL MERUELO,* STEPHEN H. NIMELSTEIN, PATRICIA P. JONES, MIRIAM LIEBERMAN, AND HUGH O. McDEVITT

21.4 Recombinant DNA technology Calculation worksheet. AQA Biology. Calculating the efficiency of DNA transfer during genetic engineering

Mendel & Inheritance. SC.912.L.16.1 Use Mendel s laws of segregation and independent assortment to analyze patterns of inheritance.

ViraBind PLUS Retrovirus Concentration and Purification Mega Kit

Brief History. Many people contributed to our understanding of DNA

ViraBind PLUS Retrovirus Concentration and Purification Kit

Yellow Fever Vaccine (Live) is a freeze-dried preparation of the 17D strain of yellow fever virus grown in fertilised hen eggs.

SNPs - GWAS - eqtls. Sebastian Schmeier

Genetics module. DNA Structure, Replication. The Genetic Code; Transcription and Translation. Principles of Heredity; Gene Mapping

PARTIALLY PURIFIED LENTINAN FROM SHIITAKE MUSHROOM (LENTINUS EDODES) STILL RETAIN ANTITUMOUR ACTIVITY

Introduction to Assay Development

-Is change in the allele frequencies of a population over generations -This is evolution on its smallest scale

B6 Albino Mouse Models

sirna Overview and Technical Tips

Induction of B-Cell Lymphoma in BALB/c Nude Mice with an Ecotropic, B-Tropic Helper Virus Present in the Murine AIDS Virus Stock

obtained from the infected and treated tissues, Fleming's2 technic of hemolytic streptococcus B. Immediately following the infection, 1.0 ml.

SELECTION FOR REDUCED CROSSING OVER IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Manuscript received November 21, 1973 ABSTRACT

Methods for the Detection of Viruses in Bovine Serum

FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO VARIABILITY IN DNA MICROARRAY RESULTS: THE ABRF MICROARRAY RESEARCH GROUP 2002 STUDY

Pre-made Lentiviral Particles for Nuclear Permeant CRE Recombinase Expression

#3: Random Fertilization. If DNA replication and cell division are both so precise, and so accurate, why are we all so unique??

MENDELIAN GENETICS This presentation contains copyrighted material under the educational fair use exemption to the U.S. copyright law.

Genetics - Problem Drill 19: Dissection of Gene Function: Mutational Analysis of Model Organisms

Adeno-Associated Virus titer and aggregation characterization

Secretory Immunoglobulin A and Herpes Keratitis

Supplementary Figure 1

Transduction of Staphylococcus aureus to

Enterovirus Plaque Technique : Utilization of Maintenance Medium on Agar Overlay without Neutral Red

Central Dogma of genetics: DNA -> Transcription -> RNA -> Translation > Protein

Unit 10: Genetics. Chapter 9: Read P

Observing Patterns In Inherited Traits

Dr. Mallery Biology Workshop Fall Semester CELL REPRODUCTION and MENDELIAN GENETICS

Chapter 11 Reading Guide: Mendel and the Gene Idea

MAS refers to the use of DNA markers that are tightly-linked to target loci as a substitute for or to assist phenotypic screening.

Introduction to Genetics. DANILO V. ROGAYAN JR. Faculty, Department of Natural Sciences

The Making of the Fittest: Natural Selection in Humans

Reference Materials for Adeno-Associated Viruses

Restriction Endonuclease Mapping of Unintegrated Viral DNA of B- and N-Tropic BALB/c Murine Leukemia Virus

Answers to additional linkage problems.

No, because expression of the P elements and hence transposase in suppressed in the F1.

Xeno-Free Systems for hesc & hipsc. Facilitating the shift from Stem Cell Research to Clinical Applications

Review Quizzes Chapters 11-16

I (ALLEN 1965; GIBSON 1970). In Tetrahymena pyriformis, syngen 1, a genetically

Transcription:

Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 585-590, February 1976 Genetics New gene locus modifying susceptibility to certain B-tropic murine leukemia viruses (N- and B-tropism/mouse embryo fibroblasts/genetic control of susceptibility to virus) ALAIN DECLEVE, OHTSURA NIWA, JOAN KOJOLA, AND HENRY S. KAPLAN Cancer Biology Research Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305 Contributed by Henry S. Kaplan, October 28,1975 ABSTRACT A new gene, SRV, the dominant allele of which occurs in mice of strain C57BL, independently modifies the slope ("hitness") and level of sensitivity of the titration curves obtained when one subclass of B-tropic murine leukemia viruses is propagated on mouse embryo cells of nonpermissive Fv-1 genotypes. Replication of another subclass of B-tropic viruses is not modified with respect to hitness, and that of N-tropic viruses is not affected. Susceptibility of mouse embryo cells to murine leukemia virus (MuLV) infection in vitro has been reported to be governed by a single gene, Fv-1 (1-5). MuLV that preferentially replicated on cells of Fv-lnn genotype were designated "N-tropic", whereas those that replicated better on cells of Fv-lbb genotype were designated "B-tropic". Heterozygotes were reported to be dominant for resistance. Titration patterns of N- and B-tropic MuLV demonstrated that host cell restriction is determined by two apparently independent parameters: (1) the slope of the titration curve at low multiplicity of infection ("hitness"), expressed in only two modes, either 1-hit or 2-hit; and (2) the level of sensitivity, a graded response manifested by the relative positions of the titration curves and by the relative endpoint dilution titers (6, 7). N- tropic viruses grown on F1 hybrid (Fv-lnb) cells exhibited 2-hit kinetics and a level of sensitivity identical to that on nonpermissive homozygous cells. For B-tropic viruses the situation was strikingly different. The WN2226-B virus on (BALB/c X DBA/2)F1 hybrids (7) and radiation leukemia virus passaged in vitro (RadLV*) on (BALB/c X NIH/ Swiss)F1 hybrids (6) yielded titration curves with 2-hit kinetics but the level of sensitivity was intermediate between those of permissive and nonpermissive homozygous hosts. The behavior of RadLV* grown on (C57BL X NIH/ Swiss)F1 hybrids was anomalous: not only was the level of sensitivity intermediate between the levels of the homozygous parental cells, but the titration curve was clearly indicative of 1-hit kinetics (6). The present report presents evidence that this anomalous behavior is unique to a specific subclass of B-tropic viruses and that, in addition to Fv-1, another gene, dominant only in certain strains of mice, also plays a major role in the control of cell restriction. This gene, which interacts with Fv-1, has been designated SRV because it was first discovered to modify "sensitivity to RadLV". MATERIALS AND METHODS Animals. C57BL/Ka and BALB/c mice were obtained from our own colony. NIH/Swiss mice, originally obtained Abbreviations: MuLV, murine leukemia virus; RadLV and RadLV*, wild-type and in vitro-passaged radiation leukemia virus; GLV*, in vitro-passaged Gross-AKR leukemia virus; IF, immunofluorescence; IT, intrathymic; MEF, mouse embryo fibroblasts. 585 from Dr. Carl Hansen, National Institutes of Health Laboratory Animal Genetic Center, were kindly provided by Dr. Paul Arnstein, National Cancer Institute-California Department of Health. All F1 hybrid, backcross, and outcross matings were performed in our laboratory. In each cross, the female is designated first. Mice of both sexes were used for intrathymic (IT) injections at 3-4 weeks of age. Tissue Culture. Primary cultures were prepared as previously described (8) from 13- to 15-day embryos of the above strains and crosses. Cell suspensions of the primary cultures were slow frozen in liquid nitrogen in minimal essential medium (MEM) with 20% fetal calf serum and 10% dimethylsulfoxide, thawed, and incubated at 370 4-5 days before secondary cultures of mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEF) were plated. Virus Preparations. Five B-tropic and 5 N-tropic viruses were studied (Table 1). WN 1802-B, passage 2, was kindly provided by Dr. Raymond C. Tennant, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn. Tennant virus, a gift from Dr. Jay A. Levy, University of California, San Francisco, was passaged more than 20 times in our laboratory on C57BL and BALB/c mouse cell lines (Tennant/BL and Tennant/BA, respectively) prior to use in these studies. Assays. The in vitro and in vivo immunofluorescence (IF) assays (16, 17) and the reverse XC plaque assay (18) have been previously described. RESULTS IF and XC Titration Patterns in Reciprocal F1 Hybrid Cells. Titrations of RadLV* and WN 1802-B (both B-tropic viruses) on reciprocal (NIH/Swiss X C57BL)F1 hybrid MEF displayed 1-hit kinetics with a level of sensitivity intermediate between the levels observed on C57BL MEF and NIH/ Swiss MEF, whereas on (NIH/Swiss X BALB/c)F1 hybrid MEF these viruses exhibited titration curves with 2-hit kinetics at a level intermediate between those of the homozygous (Fv-lbb, Fv-lnn) parent cells (Fig. 1A). The other B- tropic viruses (Tennant/BL and Tennant/BA) yielded 2-hit intermediate titration curves on either (NIH/Swiss X BALB/ c) or (NIH/Swiss X C57BL)F1 hybrid cells (Fig. 1B). All of the N-tropic viruses yielded 2-hit titration curves on both types of F1 hybrid cells which were almost superimposable on their titration curves on homozygous nonpermissive (Fv- Jbb) cells (Fig. 1C). Thus, distinctively different patterns of response are manifested by three different groups of viruses, of which RadLV*, Tennant, and Gross-AKR leukemia virus passaged in vitro (GLV*) are typical representatives. Experimental variations were observed with respect to plateau values and displacement of individual curves, but their relative positions remained the same. Titration Patterns of RadLV In Vivo. RadLV was as-

586 Genetics: Decle've et al. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 73 (1976) Table 1. Murine leukemia viruses tested Fv-1 Virus Source Tissue culture passage history tropism Refs. 1. RadLV Radiation-induced lymphoma Passaged in vivo in C57BL mice. B 9, 10 tissues from C57BL/Ka mice. 2. RadLV* Radiation-induced lymphoma tissue > 50 passages in C57BL/Ka MEF. B 11, 12 from C57BL/Ka mice, adapted to replication in vitro. 3. WN 1802-B Spleen from normal 18-month-old Serial passage in BALB/c MEF. B 13 BALB/c mouse. 4. Tennant/BA Leukemic tissue extract from C58 20th BALB/c MEF passage in our B 14 mouse, inoculated into, extracted laboratory. from, and serially passaged in BALB/c mice. 5. Tennant/BL Same as Tennant/BA. 20th C57BL/Ka MEF passage in our B 14 laboratory. 6. GLV* Thymus from leukemic C3H mouse >50 passages in C3H MEF. N 6 inoculated with Gross passage A virus after long serial passage in C3H mice. 7. RadLV/N Radiation-induced lymphoma tissue 20th NIH/Swiss MEF passage. N 15 from C57BL/Ka mice. 8. 57B-1(B) IdUrd-induced in vitro from C57BL (BL-5) cells for 20 + N a C57BL/Ka MEF. cell generations. 9. 57B-1(N) IdUrd-induced in vitro from 20 cell generations on C57BL(BL-5) N a C57BL/Ka MEF. cells, then passaged on NIH/3T3 cells for cell generations. 10. 57B-2(N) IdUrd-induced in vitro from NIH/3T3 cells for 20 + N a C57BL/Ka MEF. cell generations. a E. Gelmann, A. Declbve, 0. Niwa, S. Greenspan, and H. S. Kaplan, submitted for publication. sayed in vivo in C57BL/Ka, BALB/c, NIH/Swiss, (C57BL level of sensitivity intermediate between the levels found in X NIH)F1 hybrid, and (BALB/c X NIH)F1 hybrid mice. NIH and C57BL parents. In contrast, the (BALB/c X Despite the poor replication of RadLV in NIH/Swiss mice, NIH)F1 hybrids responded to RadLV with multi-hit kinetics the results shown in Fig. 2 indicate that the titration patterns and an intermediate level of sensitivity. described for RadLV* in vitro are also displayed by RadLV Titration Patterns of RadLV* on Individual Mouse Emin vivo. (C57BL X NIH)F1 hybrid mice exhibited approxi- bryo Cell Cultures of Selected Outcross and Backeross Gemately 1-hit kinetics similar to those of C57BL mice and a notypes. A tentative model was developed to explain the Table 2. Segregation of Fv-1 and SRV genotypes in Parental Recip. Individual (NIH x C57BL)F, X NIH Murine strain NIH C57BL or cross: /Sw /Ka F. Al A3 A4 A6 Al Bi B2 B3 B6 B7 C4 Cs C6 J RadLV* 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 GLV* 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 Hitness Phenotype tradlv* L H M L M M M M M M L M M M M M Levela GLV* H M M H M M M H M M H H M M M M bb o Fv-1 bn VI { {nn / 11 Genotype MM V SRV Mm V V V VV V VV mm V V o1 VV Combined Fv-l/SRV genotypes: bnmm, 9; bnmm, 10; nnmm, 9; nnmm, 10. a Levels of sensitivity: H = high, M = medium, L = low.

Genetics: Decle've et al. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 73 (1976) 587 Table 3. Model for genetic control of susceptibility to RadLV Phenotype Percentage of mice with specific Genotype RadLV* GLV* genotypes Mouse strain or cross Fv-1 SRV Hitness Levela Hitness Level Expected Observed C57BL/Ka BALB/c bb bb MM mm 1 1 H H 2 2 M M NIH/Swiss nn mm 2 L 1 H (C57BL x NIH)F1 bn Mm 1 M 2 M (BALB x NIH)F1 bn mm 2 M 2 M (BALB x C57BL)F1 bb Mm 1 H 2 M (BALB x C57BL)F1 x NIH bn Mm 1 b M 2 M 50 50 bn mm 2 (l.l) M 2 M 50 50 (C57BL x NIH)F1 x NIH bn Mm 1 M 2 M 25 23.6 bn mm 21 M 21 M 25 26.3 nn Mm 21(1.3) MI(1:3) 11(1:1) H 25 23.6 nn mm 2 L 1 H 25 26.3 a Levels of sensitivity: H = high, M = medium, L = low. b 1:2-hit ratios are indicated in parentheses. anomalous behavior of RadLV* and WN 1802-B in (C57BL with outcross embryo cell cultures. Individual embryos from X NIH) versus (BALB/c X NIH)Fi hybrid crosses. This the outcross (BALB/c X C57BL)F1 X NIH/Swiss would be model postulates that an additional gene, SRV, modifies the expected to segregate between two genotype categories: hitness component of the restrictive action of Fv-1 and thus bnmm and bnmm. If the model is correct, the ratio of 1:2- increases susceptibility to some B-tropic viruses. Its domi- hit kinetics expected for RadLV* in the individual outcross nant allele M (for modifier) is homozygous in strain C57BL embryos should be 1:1. That is exactly what was found when mice, and its recessive allele m is homozygous in BALB/c RadLV* was titered on MEF cultures from 26 individual and NIH/Swiss mice. The Fv-1/SRV genotypes of C57BL/ embryos of the (BALB/c X C57BL)F1 X NIH/Swiss out- Ka, BALB/c, and NIH Swiss mice would therefore be cross; 13 embryo cell cultures replicated RadLV with 1-hit bbmm, bbmm, and nnmm, respectively, and the genotypes kinetics and 13 with 2-hit kinetics. All titration curves had a of F1 hybrids of those strains would be bnmm for (C57BL X level of sensitivity intermediate to those on homozygous NIH)F1, bnmm for (BALB/c X NIH)F1, and bbmm for BALB/cbb, C57BLbb, and NIHnn MEF cultures. These in- (BALB/c X C57BL)F1. According to this model, the conver- termediate curves were similar to curves B and C in Fig. 1A sion from 2-hit to 1-hit kinetics occurs only when the M al- for RadLV* on F1 hybrids. When cultures of the same 26 inlele of SRV is present together with nb heterozygosity at the dividual (BALB/c X C57BL) X NIH/Swiss outcross embryo Fv-1 locus. cells were infected simultaneously with GLV*, all responded To test this model, an experiment was first performed with 2-hit kinetics. NIH/Swiss, C57BL/Ka, F1 hybrid, and backcross embryo fibroblasts backcross embryo cell cultures (n = 38) D3 D4 D5 De D9 D10 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E9 F1 F2 F3 F4 Fs F6 F7 GI G2 G3 G4 Gs G6 Totals 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1-hit:9 2-hit:29 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1. 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 hit:19 2-hit: 19 M L M M L M L L M M M M M M M L M L M M L M L MM L:10 M:28 M H M H H M H H H M H M H M H H M H M M H H H M H M:19 H:19 'I I I/I/I/I/ II/ o/ o/ bn:19 I/ II III/I/ I/ II/ o/ o/ o/ III o/ o/ s nn:19 III Iv vv/ v v v v v v v v v Mm:18 1111 1 II I II mm:20 vvv

588 Genetics: Decleve et al. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 73 (1976) li a~i. I I I w -i uj 0 LU 0 LL 0.1I_ 0.01_ % 11 \ % Next, RadLV* and GLV* were assayed in parallel on (NIH X C57BL)F1 X NIH individual backcross embryo cell cultures. Four different genotypes were expected: bnmm, bnmm, nnmm, and nnmm. Since the M allele has no apparent effect on infection by GLV*, suggesting that only the Fv-1 alleles determine hitness for N-tropic viruses, a ratio of 1:2-hit kinetics of 1:1 was expected for GLV*. A 1:2-hit ratio of 1:1 would also be expected for RadLV* if the M allele is able to override the repressive effect of the homozygous Fv- cem- \ Io\ \ I I ai I\ I 10-2 10-4 10-6 10-8 VIRUS DILUTION FIG. 2. Dose-response curves of wild-type RadLV in vivo in the thymus of 1-month-old C57BL/Ka (-), BALB/c (-), (C57BL X NIH)F1 (a), (BALB/c x NIH)F1 (o), and NIH/Swiss (a) mice. Thymus cell suspensions were processed for fluorescence 7 days after the virus was injected into both lobes of the thymus. -J -J C.) 0 CL. 10 [ 7 <\ mi I (C) 0.1 _- 0.01 N a\ - I I I io-2 10-4 VIRUS DILUTION FIG. 1. (A) Titration curves of RadLV*-type B-tropic viruses on MEF of: C57BL/Ka or BALB/c, (-) Curve A; (C57BL X NIH)F1, (0) Curve B; (BALB/c X NIH)F1, (0) Curve C; NIH/ Swiss, (0) Curve D. (B) Titration curves of Tennant-type B-tropic viruses on MEF of: 11 C57BL/Ka or BALB/c, (A); (C57BL X NIH)F1, (A); (BALB/c x NIH)F,,. (A); NIH/Swiss, () (C) Titration curves of N-tropic viruses on MEF of: NIH/Swiss, (-); (C57BL x NIH)F1 or (BALB/c X NIH)F1, (M); C57BL/Ka or BALB/c, (a). Inn genotype, whereas a 1:2-hit ratio of 1:3 would be expected if the M allele is recessive to the Fv-lnn genotype. Table 2 summarizes the results. A 1:2-hit ratio of 1:3 was found for RadLV*, indicating that the M allele cannot override the Fv-1nn genotype to convert 2-hit to 1-hit kinetics. The expected 1:1 ratio was observed for GLV*. In addition, it was found (Fig. SB) that for GLV* all 1-hit curves in backcross embryos were superimposable on the 1-hit titration curve for GLV* on NIH/Swiss MEF (high level of sensitivity) and all 2-hit curves were superimposable on the 2-hit titration curve for GLV* on C57BL MEF (medium level of sensitivity). With RadLV* the observations were strikingly different; three different families of curves could be observed: (a) a low level 2-hit curve (Fig. 3A, Curve D) superimposable on the 2-hit titration curve obtained on NIH/Swiss MEF (Fig. 3A, Curve E); (b) a medium level 2-hit curve (Fig. 3A, Curve C) intermediate between the titration curves on the homozygous MEF's (Fig. 3A, Curves A and E); and (c) a medium level 1-hit curve (Fig. 3A, Curve B) also intermediate between. the titration curves on homozygous parent cells. These findings suggest that the Miallele not only induces a 2-hit to 1-hit conversion in the presence of the Fv-lb allele, as stated earlier, but also acts independently from the Fv-1b allele to govern the level of sensitivity. From the observed phenotypes presented in Table 2, one can deduce the Fv-1/SRV genotypes if the assumptions of this model for the dual action of the SRV gene are correct. In Table 2 the different genotypes are listed in accordance to the phenotypic observations. Of the 38 individual backcross embryos tested, nine exhibited 2-hit kinetics with GLV* and intermediate 1-hit kinetics with RadLV* (corresponding to genotype Fv-lbn SRVMn); 10 exhibited 2-hit kinetics with both GLV and RadLV, with an intermediate level of sensitivity for RadLV (Fv-1bn SRVmm); nine exhibited 1-hit kinetics for GLV and 2-hit medium level curves for RadLV (Fv-lnn SRVMm); and 10 exhibited 1-hit kinetics with GLV*, and low level 2-hit kinetics with RadLV (Fv- Inn SRVtmm). Thus, the ratios obtained experimentally, summarized in Table 3, are entirely consistent with the model proposed here for the genetic control of sensitivity to RadLV-type B-tropic viruses. DISCUSSION The titration patterns of N-tropic and B-tropic MuLV on mouse embryo cells of homologous, heterologous, F1 hybrid, outcross, and backcross genotypes indicate that host cell re-

Genetics: Decle've et al. 0.01 1 0 u E \C 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 0.1 0.010 10-1 10-2 10-3 VIRUS DILUTION FIG. 3. (A) Titration curves of RadLV* on MEF of: C57BL/ Ka (Fv-lbb SRVMM), Curve A (A); Fv-lbn SRVmn backcross, Curve B (A); Fv-lbn SRVmm and Fv-1nn SRVMm backcross, Curve C (0); Fv-lnn SRV-- backcross, Curve D (0); NIH/Swiss (Fv-lnn SR Vmm), Curve E (o). (B) Titration curves of GLV* on MEF of: C57BL/Ka (Fv-lbb SRVMM), (0); NIH/Swiss (Fv-lnn SRVmm), (0); (Fv 1bn SRVMm) and (Fv-lbn SRVmm), backcross (A); (Fv-lnn SRVIMm) and (Fvinn SRVmm), backcross (A). Standard errors of the means of multiple titrations are indicated for each point in the backcross embryo titration curves. striction of MuLV replication is determined for RadLV* and WN 1802-B, both B-tropic viruses, by two separate genes, Fv-1 and SRV. The SRV alleles are dominant in C57BL mice and recessive in NIH and BALB/c mice. Both loci (SRV and Fv-1) control the two independent major parameters described earlier (6, 7), namely hitness and level of sensitivity. However, whereas the Fv-1 gene can operate independently with respect to both hitness and level of sensitivity, the SRV gene operates independently only on the Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 73 (1976) 589 level of sensitivity. Its action on hitness operates through Fv-1. These experiments also clearly demonstrate that at least two distinct classes of B-tropic viruses exist; the RadLV type, which respond to the SRV gene action for both hitness and level of sensitivity, and the Tennant type, which do not appear to respond to the SRV gene. None of the N-tropic viruses appeared to be influenced by the SRV gene, although the proximity of their titration curves makes it difficult to exclude small effects on levels of sensitivity. The nature of the difference between the B-tropic virus classes is not clear. Since RadLV* of C57BL origin (SRVMM) and WN 1802-B of BALB/c origin (SRVmm) responded in the same manner to the SRV gene, and since Tennant virus passaged in BALB/c cells did not differ.from Tennant virus passaged in C57BL cells, the difference in response to the SRV gene of these B-tropic viruses cannot be accounted for by their passage history. The strain C58 (Fvinn) origin of Tennant virus may offer an explanation for its failure to respond to SRV by conversion from 2-hit to 1-hit kinetics. Since N-tropic viruses and the two subclasses of B-tropic viruses respond differently to the hitness and level of sensitivity cellular control mechanisms, specific viral attributes determined by differences in these types of viral genomes must be recognized by the cell. It may be, therefore, that it is the relative efficiency of recognition of these distinctive viral traits which differs from one type of virus-host cell interaction to another. In this context, the SRV gene might act by modifying the efficiency of the dual restriction mechanism in such a way that the host cells acquire new viral recognition capabilities. The level within the cell at which the SRV gene acts is not known. It may involve either a receptor-adsorption penetration type of control mechanism, as has been found with the avian leukosis and sarcoma viruses (19-21) or some step (transcription, translation, or assembly) following integration of the viral genome, as seems to be the case for the Fv-1 gene control system (22-24). It is noteworthy that the action of the SRV gene could be observed by both the IF and XC assays. This indicates that the SRV locus does not act through the induction of infectious xenotropic viruses, since such viruses apparently do not induce plaque formation. A helper type of interaction between ecotropic and xenotropic viruses, or between mixtures of ecotropic viruses, cannot be excluded. The SRV gene effect was also observed in vivo after virus inoculation into the mouse thymus. Since earlier studies have suggested a correlation between the in mvo IF assay and the leukemogenicity of thymotropic MuLV (17) it will be of interest to evaluate the influence of the SRV gene on viral leukemia induction. It will also be desirable to study crosses between other strains of mice to ascertain whether the SRVM allele is present in some Fv-lnn strains. Such studies may clarify the relationship between SRV and other genes known to control susceptibility of mice to leukemia induction by MuLV (1). We thank Barbara Franks, Nancy Ginzton, Marilyn Travis, and James Williams for expert technical assistance. We also thank Drs. Miriam Lieberman and Theodore Pincus for their critical review of the manuscript. These studies were supported by Grants CA-03352 and CA-10372 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and by the Joseph Edward Luetje Memorial Fund. 1. Lilly, F. & Pincus, T. (1973) Adv. Cancer Res. 17,231-277. 2. Pincus, T., Hartley, J. W. & Rowe, W. P. (1971) J. Exp. Med. 133, 1219-1233.

590 Genetics: Decleve et al. 3. Pincus, T., Rowe, W. P. 1234-1241. & Lilly, F. (1971) J. Exp. Med. 133, 4. Odaka, T. (1969) J. Virol. 3,543-548. 5. Lilly, F. (1970) J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 45, 163-169. 6. Decleve, A., Niwa, O., Gelmann, E. & Kaplan, H. S. (1975) Virology 65,320-32. 7. Pincus, T., Hartley, J. W. & Rowe, W. P. (1975) Virology 65, 333-342. 8. Decleve, A., Lieberman, M., Hahn, G. M. & Kaplan, H. S. (1970) J. Virol. 5,437-445. 9. Lieberman, M. & Kaplan, H. S. (1959) Science 130,387-388. 10. Kaplan, H. S. (1967) Cancer Res. 27,1325-1340. 11. Lieberman, M., Niwa, O., Decleve, A. & Kaplan, H. S. (1973) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 70,1250-1253. 12. Decleve, A., Niwa, O., Gelmann, E. Virology 63,367-383. & Kaplan, H. S. (1975) 13. Hartley, J. W., Rowe, W. P. & Huebner, R. J. (1970) J. Virol. 5,221-225. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 73 (1976) 14. Tennant, J. R. (1972) J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 28, 1291-1303. 15. Lieberman, M., Kaplan, H. S. & Decleve, A. (1975) in The Biology of Radiation Carcinogenesis, ed. Yuhas J. (Raven Press, New York), in press. 16. Decleve, A., Niwa, O., Hilgers, J. & Kaplan, H. S. (1974) Virology 57,491-502. 17. Decleve, A., Lieberman, M., Niwa, 0. & Kaplan, H. S. (1974) Nature 252,79-80. 18. Niwa, O., Decleve, A., Lieberman, M. & Kaplan, H. S. (1973) J. Virol. 12,68-73. 19. Vogt, P. K. & Ishizaki, R. (1965) Virology 26,664-672. 20. Steck, F. T. & Rubin, H. (1966) Virology 29,628-641. 21. Piraino, F. (1967) Virology 32,700-707. 22. Huang, A. S., Besmer, P., Chu, L. & Baltimore, D. (1973) J. Virol. 12, 659-662. 23. Krontiris, T. G., Soeiro, R. & Fields, B. N. (1973) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 70,2549-2553. 24. Sveda, M. M., Fields, B. N. & Soeiro, R. (1974) Cell 2, 271-277.