Building Typology Draft Metrics

Similar documents
LEED BD+C Integrative Process. Lori A. Brown, LEED AP BD+C Power Jam Study! Lorisweb.com 1

Projected actual points. Responsible for UNC -- Project name. Remarks

LEED 2009 for Commercial Interiors. Presented by: Colleen McCafferty LEED AP Roselia Harris LEED AP

Analysis 1. LEED Analysis of Laboratory Buildings. Penn State School of Forest Resources University Park, PA

LEED And Your Indoor Environment

Alpen Windows - LEED Impact Analysis

PROJECT DESIGN EVALUATION AND APPROVAL PROCESS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARD

Sustainable Design A DIVISION OF SHIVE-HATTERY

2016 LEED Equivalency Analysis for Stanford Campus

Schematic Design Stage Report for Stanford Knight Management Center

Bullitt Center s Energy Performance

LEED Application Guide for Multiple Buildings and On Campus Building Projects

CONTENTS. 71 Section 01352, #7 (Life Cycle Cost and Life Cycle Assessment) 2/1/12 Modified entire section 72 Section 01352, #8 (Sustainability

88.2% 32% 23% WEITZ LABORATORY GOLD. PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS LEED Facts. of on-site generated construction waste was diverted from landfills.

Leased Space Environmental and Energy Efficiency Attributes Tenant Instructions

Light Control and LEED

LEED Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design

AIA/COTE 2014 Top Ten Green Projects

GLADYS VALLEY HALL. Materials & Resources Innovation & Design Process

VOL. 2/ DESIGN+ CONSTRUCTION. Group 1 Projects. Building Design and Performance Standards. University of Hawaii at Manoa

Beyond LEED, Sustainable Laboratory Design

37% 100% 100% PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS LEED Facts. Wiener Auditorium

BUILDING FOR OUR FUTURE

Environmental Stewardship Conference October 05, 2013 Energy Water and Sustainability (EWaS) Program

LEED version 4 Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design

Iconography. KAPSARC Mosque

Streamlining Regulations: San Francisco s Non-potable Water Program

LEED -Existing Buildings. Crescent Ridge Corporate Center I

McCollum Hall Classroom Renovation Project Profile LEED-CI Gold, August 2007

SUPPLEMENT FOR EDGE USER GUIDES V.2.0. Date of Publication: Refer to the EDGE website for the most recently published supplement

PRELCO INC. PRINTED PREL-DESIGN GLASS

Tate Laboratory of Physics Building Analysis

Midwest Healthcare Engineering Conference. ASHRAE Standard : Sustainability Defined for Healthcare

LEED TM Implementation Guide for Municipal Green Buildings

A Building Commissioning Overview. Presented by: Goetting & Associates Commissioning

The 2010 California Green Building Code; "CalGreen" effective January 1st, 2011

LEED v4 for Homes, Residential Project Summary and Checklist One and Two Family New Construction

SAMPLE ZNE PRESENTATION

optimize daylighting Opportunities

LEED LEED. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. A voluntary, consensus-based. high-performance, sustainable buildings and neighborhoods

2016 CALGREEN RESIDENTIAL CHECKLIST MANDATORY ITEMS City of San Carlos - Building Division 600 Elm Street, San Carlos, CA Phone:

Exemplary Performance

The Creative and Performing Arts High School (CAPA) Pittsburgh, PA 9/30/2002 Andrew Tech Mechanical Option Prof. S. A. Mumma

Achieving Zero Carbon for Buildings in a Densely Populated City and a Subtropical Climate. Guiyi LI Construction Industry Council

n. Memorandum, ASA(IE&E), 24 Aug 2012, subject: Energy Goal Attainment Responsibility Policy for Installations.

LEED Application Guide for Multiple Buildings and On-Campus Building Projects

CALGREEN NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING Checklist

DPR Phoenix Regional Office Net Zero Certification

LEED Rated Government Buildings. Government Sector Construction. CPWD Construction Work Load

LEED Basics. Presented by. Jeremy Knoll PGAV Architects

Toyota Logistics Service. Portland Vehicle Distribution Center Redevelopment

Italcementi Center for Research and Innovation

Implementation by DeCA facilities of Executive Order (EO) Planning for Federal Sustainability in the Next Decade.

ZERO ENERGY ZERO WATER GREEN BUILDING CONFERENCE

One That is Already Built.

LEED v4 Credit Guidance for Andersen Products LEED for Building Design and Construction: Homes and Multifamily Midrise

Energy Efficiency: Designing Wood-Frame Buildings for Occupant Comfort

LEED Nc 3.0 Statement

LEED SUPPORT GUIDE v3+v4 INSULATED METAL PANELS FOR SUSTAINABILITY & ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Sr Alan SIN Chief Property Services Manager/2

LEED v4 Building Design and Construction Quiz #8 EQ

Research Analysis: Building Envelope and LEED Credits Introduction

LEED Project Delivery Process Manual Appendices

Living Building Challenge The Metaphor of a Flower

Cost Benefits of SunGuard SN 54

500 WEST PUTNAM AVENUE GREENWICH, CT

Green Building Rating System

LEED for Commercial Interiors

Middlebury College SUSTAINABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES. November 2008 FINAL

ADEC S SUSTAINABLE FUTURE SCHOOLS PROGRAM

Valley View Middle School

ASHRAE s s Sustainable Roadmap. .meet the ASHRAE GreenGuide. Research Strategic Plan. Journal Articles

35% reduction in water use below code maximum 83% 88% 49% reduction in lighting power density 12%

TELUS Garden. Best Practice for Commercial Building Performance. Read this article and take the quiz at:

We make buildings greener. W ith Advanced Architectural Glass. Updated for LEED Version 3

CAMBRIDGE PUBLIC LIBRARY

HELPING HVAC PROFESSIONALS TAKE THE LEED ACHIEVING LEED CERTIFICATION

Reflect. Densify. Reduce. Increase. Vertimeme. VERTIMEME

Elemental Excellence Brings Monumental Results. sustainable elements

BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee Gateway Building Sustainable Case Study

WELCOME. Page 1. WELCOME to the Building Environmental Comfort Verification Survey.

ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS FOR ALL OCCUPANCIES

Carbon Neutral 60% 70% 80% 90% Today

NEW FOUR STORY MEDICAL CENTER OWNER S PROJECT REQUIREMENTS

WHAT IS A SUSTAINABLE BUILDING?

Draft Policy for Commissioning/ Retro-Commissioning

LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations

Case Study: Element PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Balco, Inc. PC Series Partition Closure Systems

Appendix Energy Guidelines Deliverable Requirements

TORONTO GREEN STANDARD v3

CITY OF ORANGE BUILDING DIVISION 2016 Green Building Code Requirements For Residential Construction

INTERIORS GREEN GLOBES FOR SUSTAINABLE INTERIORS. Green Globes for SUSTAINABLE GREEN GLOBES TECHNICAL REFERENCE MANUAL

Toronto GREEN Development Standard Checklist [for Low-Rise Residences]

QUALITY SUSTAINS YKK AP Guide to LEED v4 Certification

Decorative Division. GANA Decorative Glass LEED White Paper Page 1 of 23

Columbia Skylights may qualify your project for LEED points in the following categories: Columbia Skylights - Potential Contribution to LEED projects

DESIGN OF A GREEN DEMO BUILDING IN A HOT AND HUMID CITY IN CHINA. Ana Bacall Sebesta Blomberg & Associates Woburn, MA

LEED Certification Strategy

Discussion #3 LEED v4 Impact Category and Point Allocation Development Process GA03 LEED v4 Impact Category and Point Allocation Development Process

Transcription:

Building Typology Draft Metrics

Seattle s Sustainable Building Tool www2.ci.seattle.wa.us/implement

DRAFT MEASURING METRICS SUCCESS Building Typology Principles 1. Design based on building type 2. Provide adaptability 3. Respond to climate, culture and place 4. Go beyond baseline design standards 5. Treat waste as a resource 6. Reduce the carbon footprint 7. Increase human potential 8. Ensure design intent 9. Encourage collaboration 10. Capture pedagogical opportunities 11. Optimize operations

DRAFT MEASURING METRICS SUCCESS Living Campus Principle: Overall campus performance is to be climate neutral or better Design based on building type Fundamental Strategy: Use scientifically informed design All building types selected for Carolina North shall be analyzed for energy and water conservation and efficiency measures prior to design. (This analysis will be available to the users, facility and operations staff, energy services and design team for use in design and planning decisions. It could be used in RFP/RFQ documents.) 1. Design based on building type 2. Provide adaptability 3. Respond to climate, culture and place 4. Go beyond baseline design standards 5. Treat waste as a resource 6. Reduce the carbon footprint 7. Increase human potential 8. Ensure design intent 9. Encourage collaboration 10. Capture pedagogical opportunities 11. Optimize operations

DRAFT MEASURING METRICS SUCCESS Living Campus Principle: The campus will increase vitality of people, prosperity and the planet Provide adaptability Fundamental Strategy: Accommodate program and regulatory changes STRATEGIES: Evaluate all buildings during the design phase for reasonable reactions to program changes Use life cycle assessments for selecting materials, assemblies and systems to minimize maintenance, repair and replacement Enable disassembly of all building components (shell, services, furnishings and finishes) so they can more easily be reused or recycled 1. Design based on building type 2. Provide adaptability 3. Respond to climate, culture and place 4. Go beyond baseline design standards 5. Treat waste as a resource 6. Reduce the carbon footprint 7. Increase human potential 8. Ensure design intent 9. Encourage collaboration 10. Capture pedagogical opportunities 11. Optimize operations

DRAFT MEASURING METRICS SUCCESS Living Campus Principle: The campus will increase vitality of people, prosperity and the planet Respond to climate, culture and place Localize sources for materials METRIC: Lightweight materials shall not come from more than X miles from Carolina North, medium weight materials X miles, heavy materials X miles Goal: Lightweight materials 1,000 miles Medium weight materials 500 miles Heavy material 250 miles Optimize solar orientation METRIC: Buildings are oriented east / west so that the longer façade faces solar south, +/- X degrees Goal: +/-7 degrees Respect the topography of the land METRIC: Land X feet beyond all building footprints shall not be disturbed during construction Goal: 20 feet 1. Design based on building type 2. Provide adaptability 3. Respond to climate, culture and place 4. Go beyond baseline design standards 5. Treat waste as a resource 6. Reduce the carbon footprint 7. Increase human potential 8. Ensure design intent 9. Encourage collaboration 10. Capture pedagogical opportunities 11. Optimize operations

DRAFT MEASURING METRICS SUCCESS Living Campus Principle: The campus will increase vitality of people, prosperity and the planet Respond to climate, culture and place Utilize free resources first METRIC: Provide a minimum daylight illumination level of X footcandles in a minimum of X % of all regularly occupied areas including common spaces. Goal: 25 footcandles, 85% METRIC: X % of perimeter spaces shall have operable windows. Goal: 100% METRIC: X % of rooftop rainwater shall be harvested for nonpotable uses. Goal: 100% METRIC: Minimum X % of campus wide rooftop rainwater shall be harvested and cleaned for potable use. Goal: 25% Integrate site-appropriate renewable energy sources METRIC: X % of all campus buildings shall have provisions for integrating renewable energy sources that can be tied to the central energy supply system Goal: 100% 1. Design based on building type 2. Provide adaptability 3. Respond to climate, culture and place 4. Go beyond baseline design standards 5. Treat waste as a resource 6. Reduce the carbon footprint 7. Increase human potential 8. Ensure design intent 9. Encourage collaboration 10. Capture pedagogical opportunities 11. Optimize operations

DRAFT MEASURING METRICS SUCCESS Living Campus Principle: Overall campus performance is to be climate neutral or better Go beyond baseline design standards Fundamental Strategy: Exceed local energy and water codes STRATEGY : All buildings on campus shall be more efficient than the local energy and water codes (The level of efficiency will be determined for each building type) Exceed energy policy act (water) METRIC: Every building shall use a minimum of X % less potable water than the indoor water use baseline calculated for the building, after meeting the Energy Policy Act of 1992 fixture performance requirements. Goal: 60%-70% less Exceed current ASHRAE 90.1-energy standard for buildings METRIC: As an aggregate the buildings on the Carolina North Campus shall be a minimum of X % more efficient than the current ASHRAE 90.1-Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings Goal: 35% 1. Design based on building type 2. Provide adaptability 3. Respond to climate, culture and place 4. Go beyond baseline design standards 5. Treat waste as a resource 6. Reduce the carbon footprint 7. Increase human potential 8. Ensure design intent 9. Encourage collaboration 10. Capture pedagogical opportunities 11. Optimize operations

DRAFT MEASURING METRICS SUCCESS Living Campus Principle: Overall campus performance is to be climate neutral or better Treat waste as a resource Group synergistic building types together METRIC: X % of excess energy and water from each building will feed adjacent buildings or the central system Goal: 100% Participate in campus-wide recycling program METRIC: X % of campus buildings will recycle all glass, metal, paper, cardboard, paperboard and plastics. Goal: 100% Compost organic materials METRIC: X % of campus organic wastes shall be composted onsite. Goal: 100% Recycle or reuse building materials METRIC: Ensure that a minimum of X % of all materials, products, and systems used in a building are recyclable or able to be salvaged for reuse Goal: 90% 1. Design based on building type 2. Provide adaptability 3. Respond to climate, culture and place 4. Go beyond baseline design standards 5. Treat waste as a resource 6. Reduce the carbon footprint 7. Increase human potential 8. Ensure design intent 9. Encourage collaboration 10. Capture pedagogical opportunities 11. Optimize operations

DRAFT MEASURING METRICS SUCCESS Living Campus Principle: Overall campus performance is to be climate neutral or better Reduce the carbon footprint Reduce fossil fuel use METRIC: Reduce fossil fuel use for all buildings at Carolina North incrementally to X by the year 2030 Goal: zero Create carbon neutral buildings METRIC: Purchase renewable energy credits or carbon offsets for X % of all non-renewable energy fuels used. Goal: 100% Account for Impact of Construction METRIC: X % of campus construction projects shall offset their embodied carbon footprint through a one-time carbon offset Goal: 100% 1. Design based on building type 2. Provide adaptability 3. Respond to climate, culture and place 4. Go beyond baseline design standards 5. Treat waste as a resource 6. Reduce the carbon footprint 7. Increase human potential 8. Ensure design intent 9. Encourage collaboration 10. Capture pedagogical opportunities 11. Optimize operations

DRAFT MEASURING METRICS SUCCESS Living Campus Principle: The campus will increase vitality of people, prosperity and the planet Increase human potential Provide connections to the natural environment METRIC: Provide at least X % of the regularly occupied spaces and public common spaces with views to the outside. Goal: 90% Provide and maintain acceptable thermal comfort METRIC: Design X % buildings to comply with the current AHSRAE 55, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. (The environmental factors addressed are temperature, thermal radiation, humidity, and air speed; the personal factors are those of activity and clothing). Goal: 100% Eliminate products that negatively affect indoor air quality METRIC: X % of all campus buildings shall comply with LEED TM credits for Indoor Environmental Quality 4.1-4.4 for reducing off-gassing and volatile organic compounds. Goal: 100% Select benign materials and products METRIC: X% of buildings shall avoid materials that include known persistent bio-accumulating toxins, carcinogens, and reproductive toxicants Goal: 100% 1. Design based on building type 2. Provide adaptability 3. Respond to climate, culture and place 4. Go beyond baseline design standards 5. Treat waste as a resource 6. Reduce the carbon footprint 7. Increase human potential 8. Ensure design intent 9. Encourage collaboration 10. Capture pedagogical opportunities 11. Optimize operations

DRAFT MEASURING METRICS SUCCESS Living Campus Principle: The campus will increase vitality of people, prosperity and the planet Increase human potential Provide and maintain acceptable indoor air quality METRIC: Design X buildings other than labs to comply with the current ASHRAE 62-Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality Goal: 100% METRIC: Design X lab buildings to comply with current ANSI/AHIA Z9.5, American National Standard for Laboratory Ventilation Goal: 100% Provide controllability of comfort systems METRIC: Provide at least X % of building occupants with individual comfort controls or access to operable windows for building perimeter (20ft) occupants Goal: 50% Provide controllability of lighting systems METRIC: Provide at least X % of building occupants with lighting controls Goal: 90% 1. Design based on building type 2. Provide adaptability 3. Respond to climate, culture and place 4. Go beyond baseline design standards 5. Treat waste as a resource 6. Reduce the carbon footprint 7. Increase human potential 8. Ensure design intent 9. Encourage collaboration 10. Capture pedagogical opportunities 11. Optimize operations

DRAFT MEASURING METRICS SUCCESS Living Campus Principle: Overall campus performance is to be climate neutral or better Ensure design intent Fundamental Strategy: Commission all buildings. STRATEGY: Assign a third party commissioning agent to work with the design team from design through post-occupancy on all building projects. The agent shall verify the installation, calibration and performance of the energy and water related systems according to the owner s projects requirements, basis of design, and construction documents. 1. Design based on building type 2. Provide adaptability 3. Respond to climate, culture and place 4. Go beyond baseline design standards 5. Treat waste as a resource 6. Reduce the carbon footprint 7. Increase human potential 8. Ensure design intent 9. Encourage collaboration 10. Capture pedagogical opportunities 11. Optimize operations

DRAFT MEASURING METRICS SUCCESS Living Campus Principle: The campus is pedagogical Encourage collaboration Create collaboration spaces METRIC: The number of cross discipline projects shall increase to at least X % of all campus research projects. OR Multiple discipline research projects increases to a minimum of X per day. Goal: 25% or five per day Capture potential functional uses METRIC: Each space (indoor and outdoor) created shall have at least X functional uses Goal: three 1. Design based on building type 2. Provide adaptability 3. Respond to climate, culture and place 4. Go beyond baseline design standards 5. Treat waste as a resource 6. Reduce the carbon footprint 7. Increase human potential 8. Ensure design intent 9. Encourage collaboration 10. Capture pedagogical opportunities 11. Optimize operations

DRAFT MEASURING METRICS SUCCESS Living Campus Principle: The campus is pedagogical Capture pedagogical opportunities Provide access to sustainable systems METRIC: At least X % of research projects will be about sustainable technologies Goal: 25% Collect and share performance data METRIC: X % of campus buildings shall have a means to collect real time performance data and be able to share the results to the public at large via the world wide web (www). Goal: 100% Demonstrate developing technologies METRIC: At least X % of campus buildings shall demonstrate a developing technology for energy efficiency, water efficiency, or reuse of resources that is appropriate for that building type. Goal: 50% 1. Design based on building type 2. Provide adaptability 3. Respond to climate, culture and place 4. Go beyond baseline design standards 5. Treat waste as a resource 6. Reduce the carbon footprint 7. Increase human potential 8. Ensure design intent 9. Encourage collaboration 10. Capture pedagogical opportunities 11. Optimize operations

DRAFT MEASURING METRICS SUCCESS Living Campus Principle: The campus will increase vitality of people, prosperity and the planet Optimize operations Incorporate healthy cleaning practices METRIC: Implement a campus-wide green housekeeping program where at least X % of products meet a low-toxicity or non-toxic cleaning product standard, such as the Green Seal standards. Goal: 90% Account for ongoing building resource consumption METRIC: All projects obtaining LEED-NC certification will obtain LEED EB Certification after X years of operation Goal: Five Utilize post occupancy evaluations METRIC: Provide post occupancy evaluations after the first and fifth years of use for X % of campus buildings and incorporate the evaluation findings into future projects Goal: 100% 1. Design based on building type 2. Provide adaptability 3. Respond to climate, culture and place 4. Go beyond baseline design standards 5. Treat waste as a resource 6. Reduce the carbon footprint 7. Increase human potential 8. Ensure design intent 9. Encourage collaboration 10. Capture pedagogical opportunities 11. Optimize operations

Implement: City of Seattle s Sustainable Building Tool

Building Types Studied Fire Station Office Tenant Improvement

Macro Strategies Identified Energy Efficiency Measures 12 Saving Strategies Identified Optimized Glazing Optimized Shading Optimized Lighting Daylight Dimming Efficient Equipment Building Orientation Building Massing Thermal Mass Optimized Mechanical Systems Natural Ventilation Passive Solar Optimized Envelope Water Efficiency Measures 6 Saving Strategies Identified Low Flow Fixtures Low Flow Water Closets Waterless Urinals Native Landscaping Rainwater Harvesting Graywater System

Ranking of energy strategies: Medium Office, Seattle

Cumulative energy measures: Medium Office, Seattle Nat Vent + Mech Imp + Imp Env + OH + Solar + Imp Glaz + Daylight + Equipment + Lights Nat Vent + Mech Imp + Imp Env + OH + Solar + Imp Glaz + Daylight + Lower Equipment Power Nat Vent + Mech Imp + Imp Env + OH + Solar + Imp Glaz + Daylight Nat Vent + Mech Imp + Imp Env + OH + Solar + Improve Glazing Nat Vent + Mech Imp + Imp Env + OH + Solar Nat Vent + Mech Imp + Imp Env + OH Nat Vent + Mech Imp + Improved Envelope Nat Vent + Mech Improvements Naturally Ventilated Base Case

Building Operation: Medium Office, Seattle Nat Vent + Mech Imp + Imp Env + OH + Solar + Imp Glaz + Daylight + Equipment + Lights Nat Vent + Mech Imp + Imp Env + OH + Solar + Imp Glaz + Daylight + Lower Equipment Power Nat Vent + Mech Imp + Imp Env + OH + Solar + Imp Glaz + Daylight Nat Vent + Mech Imp + Imp Env + OH + Solar + Improve Glazing STRATEGIES Nat Vent + Mech Imp + Imp Env + OH + Solar Nat Vent + Mech Imp + Imp Env + OH Nat Vent + Mech Imp + Improved Envelope Nat Vent + Mech Improvements Naturally Ventilated Base Case

Emissions: Medium Office, Seattle

Capital Costs - Trend Medium Office Building City of Seattle $45,000 $5.950 $39,178 $40,000 $5.900 $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $5.795 $20,679 $5.733 $5.850 $5.800 $5.750 $10,000 $5,000 $0 Baseline Building Operable Windows (free cooling from outside air) Optimized Mechanical Optimized Envelope External Shading Right Orientation Optimized Glazing Daylight Dimming Efficient Equipment Optimized Lighting Annual Operating Costs First Costs in Millions $5.700 $5.650 Energy Efficient Strategies Annual Operating Costs First Cost (Millions)

Base case water use: Medium Office, Seattle

Efficient case water use: Medium Office, Seattle

Adding graywater reuse: Medium Office, Seattle

Using harvested rainwater: Medium Office, Seattle

Seattle s Sustainable Building Tool www2.ci.seattle.wa.us/implement

City of Seattle s Sustainable Building Tool

Implement: Medium Office Energy Matrix

Implement: Medium Office Orientation (Sub-Tool)

Implement: Medium Office Water Matrix