Software Maintenance, Sustaining Engineering, and Operational Support

Similar documents
Deriving Software Sustainment Cost Estimating Relationships in a Diverse Army Execution Environment

Software Cost Metrics Manual

DRAFT. Effort = A * Size B * EM. (1) Effort in person-months A - calibrated constant B - scale factor EM - effort multiplier from cost factors

Estimating SOA, As Easy as 1 2 3

DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY ISA 101 BASIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ACQUISITION

Software Growth Analysis

Passit4Sure.OG Questions. TOGAF 9 Combined Part 1 and Part 2

UNCLASSIFIED. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: February 2005 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY DEFENSE WIDE RDT&E BA 6

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOK ACQUISITION OF SOFTWARE ENVIRONMENTS AND SUPPORT SOFTWARE

Business Case Analysis. Mr. Ken East, C.P.L.

Team #1: Information Technology Software. Team Leads: Ms. Amanda Graham, Boeing Mr. Jody Cox ODASD (SCI)

DoD Template for Application of TLCSM and PBL In the Weapon System Life Cycle

Systems Engineering Challenges for an Army Life Cycle Software Engineering Center

BAE Systems Insyte Software Estimation

Standardization Template

General Atomics Aeronautical: Partnering with DoD

Addressing the Challenges of Systems Engineering Estimation

Architecture Centric Evolution

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Computer Science 61 (2015 )

Software Sustainment. Defense Acquisition University Jason Hamilton Professor, Information Technology 7 June PSM Workshop [7 June 2017] 1

Mission Success in Complex Environments (MSCE)

The DCARC UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. DCARC Helpdesk Jen Horner (253) x1. Software and Web Development

CHAPTER 1 Introduction

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 12 R-1 Line #136

Department of Defense Award for Supply Chain Excellence CALL FOR ENTRIES

Army Sustainability: Leading

AFMO. Army Financial. Management Optimization. Driving Change in Financial Management across the Army Enterprise

1.Which of the items listed below is not one of the software engineering layers?

Net-Ready Key Performance Parameter (NR-KPP) Implementation Guidebook

Arke Ltd. MOSAIC (Modular Open System Architectures Integrated Cost model)

Command and Control Software Development Lessons Learned. Lt Col Michael D. Sarchet Deputy Director, Space Systems Command and Control Division

Bottom-Up Methods of Estimating Depot Level Repairables (DLR) Costs

Acquisition Domain: Leading Transformation

COMMITMENT. Software Quality for Non-Software Professionals

Applying Agility to DoD Common Operating Platform Environment Initiatives

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

3 PART THREE: WORK PLAN AND IV&V METHODOLOGY (SECTION 5.3.3)

Choosing the Right Measures -

Best Practices for the Architecture, Design, and Modernization of Defense Models and Simulations

Overview. Introduction to Honeywell. Environment. Honeywell s Public-Private Partnerships. Partnership Challenges

Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V)

IMI, Inc. MDA Best Practices for the Agile Enterprise. Louis J. Eyermann PRESENTED BY: PEO STRI Project Office for Common Product Components

Cost-Effective Readiness

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

U.S. Army PEO STRI Cost Management Implementation

Application of the Integrated Product Support Elements

Department of Defense MANUAL

Performance-Based Logistics: Buying Performance, Not Parts

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC 20546

Software Cost Estimation Issues for Future Ground Systems

PMI EXAM - PMI-001. Project Management Professional v5. Buy Full Product.

Applying Systems Engineering to ITS Projects: Advancing Beyond Federal Rule 940. INCOSE IW Transportation Working Group January 27, 2015

Requirements Analysis and Design Definition. Chapter Study Group Learning Materials

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Work in this project is performed by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL), Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Enterprise Portal. Digital Government: Government-to-Citizen (G to C)

Complex Systems (Systems of Systems) Technology and What s Next!

Number: DI-IPSC-81427B Approval Date:

Naval Set-Based Design

CERTIFIED SOFTWARE QUALITY ENGINEER

Improving Weapon System Investment Decisions A Knowledge-based Approach to Weapon System Acquisitions Could Improve Outcomes

Practical Risk Management: Framework and Methods

Guideline Asset Management

TOGAF 9.1 in Pictures

CENTRE FOR MARITIME RESEARCH AND EXPERIMENTATION

Department of Navy Audit Update

BOE Training Material The Drive Toward data driven Estimating Boeing/Lockheed Martin/Northrop Grumman

20028 Joint Software Systems Safety Engineering Handbook Implementation Guide

SuprTEK PanOptes TM Continuous Monitoring Platform


Service Requirements Review Board Department of Defense-Level 4th Estate Reviews Frequently Asked Questions

Implementing a Data Collection Tool to Estimate and Analyze Spending ICEAA Conference June 2013

An Analysis of the UK MoD s Through-Life Approach to Weapon Systems Sustainment

Software Quality Management

Joint Cargo Aircraft (JCA) Lewis Edinburgh, JCA Program Manager

NETCENTS-2 SOLUTIONS: THE VEHICLE ENABLING THE IT LIFECYCLE

Enabling Maintenance in a Net-centric Environment

PMI Scheduling Professional (PMI-SP)

Competency Area: Business Continuity and Information Assurance

System Security Engineering and Program Protection Case Study for the Materiel Solution Analysis Phase Tutorial Exercises

INTEGRATED PROGRAM & PROJECT MANAGEMENT A STRATEGIC APPROACH

the USMC Expeditionary Fighting g Vehicle

SPAWAR Paperless Initiatives Partnering for Success

Contrasting CMMI and the PMBOK. Systems Engineering Conference October 2005

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOK PARTS MANAGEMENT

Availability = Uptime/ Total Operating Time

Need for Affordability Analysis in Systems Engineering

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Audit of Shared Services Canada s Information Technology Asset Management

Package 11 of the Future Combat Systems (FCS) Program

IUID-Enabled Serialized Item Management in Operations and Maintenance November 2011

Overcoming Obsolescence and Upgrading Integrated Small Arms Abstract May 2012

Risk Based Testing. -Why we need RBT? -Types of risks -Managing risks -Methods of evaluation & risk analysis -Costs and benefits

IBM A EXAM QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

Air Force Life Cycle Management Center

Agile Acquisition. Peter Modigliani 10 Dec 12. Presented to: Mr. Koen Gijsbers. General Manager NATO Communications and Information Agency

Stakeholder Needs and Expectations

Enterprise Architecture: an ideal discipline for use in Supply Chain Management

Aligning and rationalizing your business applications. How to simplify the IT portfolio and reduce costs in financial services

Agenda Framing Assumptions (FAs) Lunch and Learn, March 8, Presenter: Brian Schultz. Moderator: Lt Col Doherty

Requirements Gathering using Object- Oriented Models

Transcription:

Software Maintenance, Sustaining Engineering, and Operational Support Estimating Software Maintenance Costs for U.S. Army Weapons Systems Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Cost and Economics (ODASA-CE) SCEA-ISPA Conference 28 June 2012 1-28 June 2012

Presentation Outline Software maintenance and sustaining engineering - the current DOD environment Linking software maintenance investment to mission capability Identifying and addressing the key software maintenance performance factors U.S. Army weapons system software maintenance cost estimation approach 2-28 June 2012

AH-64D Longbow Night Fury 10,000 Flying Hours Reached on 28 June 2011 340,000 hours of maintenance by hundreds of weapons technicians in conjunction with countless hours of repairs and inspections performed by avionics, electrical and environmental, engine, fuels and structural personnel If there was a 20% cut on avionics software maintenance, what would be the mission impact? 3-28 June 2012

DOD Historical Funding 850 DoD Historical Topline 750 650 Constant Year 2012 $B 550 450 38% Reduction Vietnam 30% Reduction? 32% Reduction Iraq and Cold War Afghanistan 350 Korea 250 150 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 Fiscal Year 4-28 June 2012

Significant Growth in DOD Software Maintenance Resource Requirements ($) Sustainment Time 4-5X Longer Than Dev-Prod We cannot presently link money invested in software maintenance or sustaining engineering to mission capability We ve lived in a rich man s world where there has been less emphasis on cost over the past 10 years. Dr. Jacques Gansler 5-28 June 2012

What Does The Software Capability-Cost Curve Look Like? Maintenance Requirements - Cost ($M) Increased Risk - Increased Capability "It's All About the Money, Dr. Chien Huo, CAPE, November 2011 6-28 June 2012

DOD Software Maintenance Environment Software is the default component for increasing system capability and performance Operational requirements are dynamic and complex Maintenance budgets are becoming more constrained and vulnerable Difficult to support/defend program software life cycle cost estimates and annual maintenance budget requests Limited understanding of the relationships between software investments, applied resources, product outputs, and mission capability Multiple perspectives: enterprise - program - maintenance organization - user base Increasingly complex cost inter-relationships / data sets 7-28 June 2012

Software Maintenance Cost-Capability Framework Personnel Software Products Cost Capability law and policy Facilities Software Services functional domain economic environment estimation capability system interfaces operational environment Software Changes software baseline architecture - design requirements - change drivers 8-28 June 2012

Key Questions What are we paying for? How much does it cost? How do we accurately estimate these costs? What is our return on investment? How do we define output and performance 9-28 June 2012

Software Maintenance Top Level Cost Factors Public Law and DOD Policy - Depot maintenance mandates - Title 10 - Operational funding allocation restrictions - Development - PDSS - PPSS program phases - Maintenance decision authority Economic Environment - Post conflict downturn - Loss of OCO funding - System replacement and refurbishment demands - Funding consistency 10-28 June 2012

Software Maintenance Top Level Cost Factors Cost Estimation Capability - identification of maintenance products and activities - estimation processes and models - maintenance planning vs. execution inconsistencies - information infrastructure limitations - linking dollars to output - data availability and integrity All of these factors impact the integrity of historical software maintenance cost data and the ability to construct consistent estimating relationships 11-28 June 2012

Software Maintenance Work Breakdown Structure Common structure that includes all potential products and activities what s in - what s out Consistent definitions - terminology Emphasis on DOD weapons systems Basis for identifying specific cost elements attributable to a given program or system maintenance/sustaining engineering effort Applicable to organic and contractor maintenance efforts Product based - driven by changes to the software baseline(s) Intended to be tailored and adapted for each program or organization: - Addition/deletion of lower level cost elements - Re-binning of lower level cost elements Foundation for cost estimation process/models Basis for defining cost estimating relationships 12-28 June 2012

Summary Work Breakdown Structure Software Maintenance, Sustaining Engineering, and Operational Support 1.0 Software Maintenance 2.0 Software Licenses 5.0 Sustaining Engineering 6.0 Facilities & Infrastructure Releases 1 Planning - Management Software Requirements Architecture & Design Change Implementation Integration & Test Acceptance Test Rework Emergency Repairs (Hardware Updates) Releases 1+ 3.0 Information Assurance 4.0 Certification & Accreditations Analysis and Studies Test Support Software Delivery User Training User Support Field Support Development Facilities Integration and Test Facilities Tactical Equipment Test Equipment and Tools 7.0 Management Program Management Contract Management Change Management Data Management Quality Assurance Process Management Personnel Management 13-28 June 2012

Summary Work Breakdown Structure 1.0 Software Maintenance - products and activities associated with modifying an operational software product or system 2.0 Software Licenses - products and activities associated with the procurement and renewal of software licenses for operational software 3.0 Information Assurance - products and activities associated with ensuring that the software is compliant with externally defined information assurance requirements 4.0 Certifications and Accreditations - products and activities associated with verifying a software system against externally defined domain performance criteria 5.0 Sustaining Engineering - products and activities associated with supporting a deployed software product or system in its operational environment 6.0 Facilities & Infrastructure - products and activities associated with establishing and operating the facilities and processes required to modify, integrate, and test operational software products or systems 7.0 Management - products and activities associated with planning, organizing, funding, and controlling the resources required to support operational software products or systems 14-28 June 2012

WBS Application Considerations Two perspectives - program and organization Includes both products and services Mandates vs. discretionary products/activities Diversity of program and organizational perspectives Sources of funding Consistency of execution - PDSS to PPSS - PPSS year to year - plan to actual 15-28 June 2012

Maintenance - Consistency of Execution Cycles are different - platform dependent User needs drive release content 16-28 June 2012

Current Software Maintenance Estimation Methods Parametric models - Only include corrective, perfective, adaptive changes & enhancements - Invalid assumptions about sustaining engineering tasks - Historical data not visible in all models - Not calibrated - validated Past software maintenance funding - effort - Limited access to historical FTE - Budget data - Represent rolled-up costs - Requirements or LOE funding? - Availability of correlated program development - sustainment cost data 17-28 June 2012

Current Estimation Methods (continued) Number of lines of code per software engineer - Each engineer can maintain 20K-25K LOC/ESLOC - Does not reflect the impact of software reuse or COTS Software maintenance estimated as a percentage of development costs - Rule(s) of thumb - development based: S/W maintenance costs - 2/3 of total S/W life cycle costs S/W maintenance costs - 60% to 75% of total S/W life cycle costs Annual S/W maintenance costs - 5% to 10% of total S/W life cycle costs - Ignores total system life cycle software growth and maintenance requirements/strategy/tasks All of these methods have significant limitations in the current DOD environment 18-28 June 2012

Software System Growth 107 - AH-64As 1620 - AH-64Ds Apache Software Growth 300 KSLOC to Over 1.4 Million SLOC 19-28 June 2012

Objectives Army Software Maintenance Study Improve the availability, integrity, and usability of software maintenance and sustaining engineering cost and performance data Develop methods and models to generate defensible software maintenance and sustaining engineering cost estimates Provide a basis for objectively relating budgeted software maintenance resources to mission capability Influence DOD software maintenance and sustaining engineering policy 20-28 June 2012

Approach Army Software Maintenance Study Sponsored by U.S. Army Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Cost & Economics (ODASA-CE) Collaborative environment - diverse perspectives Army, Air Force, Navy, OSD, Industry participation Initial focus on weapons system costs Technical approach based on measurement and estimation best practices 21-28 June 2012

Army Software Maintenance Cost Estimation Framework Relates the key products required to develop more viable software maintenance - sustaining engineering cost estimates - Work Breakdown Structure w/common terminology and OPS-29 alignment - Information needs - data collection requirements (current and future) - Collected maintenance data sets - database - Product - system characterization / context description - Product and activity specific CERs - Context driven cost-uncertainty model(s) - Integrated cost estimation process - model(s) 22-28 June 2012

Work Breakdown Structure Data Collection Structure Product - System Source Data product/system characterization data processes/methods product/services WBS instantiation planned/actual cost data OPS-29 Funding Model Terminology program environment Cost Uncertainty Model cost uncertainty factors risk relationships best practices requirements information needs measures - data Integrated Cost Estimation Process-Models Structured Cost Data data set characterization - availability/content - integrity - usability data demographics data access Cost Estimating Relationships parametric relationships cost ratios product-activity specific domain specific estimation process model product-activity -context driven estimation methodologies predictive cost performance incremental enhancement life cycle phase relationships Mission capability model(s) 23-28 June 2012

Software Maintenance Notional Cost Estimation Model Software Product Release Software Baseline Program Management Planning - Management Infrastructure SW Change Drivers Mission doctrine New capability User identified defects Information assurance Obsolescence (HW/SW) System interfaces Technical debt Deferred functionality Testing - IV&V Software Requirements Architecture - Design Change Implementation Integration & Test Acceptance Test Rework Emergency Repairs Sustaining Engineering Cost Estimate Other Licenses Information Assurance C&As 24-28 June 2012

Cost Estimation Considerations Aligned estimation methodologies Work scope - activities performed - products released Fixed cost elements Variable cost elements Cost risk - uncertainty factors System configuration complexity Application domain type Software change drivers - source - type/impact - priority - relative value 25-28 June 2012

WBS - Estimation Framework 26-28 June 2012

Software Configuration Complexity Multiple software releases are being worked on by maintenance staff in parallel during a calendar year - Development release - Fielded release - To be fielded release - Requirements release 4,300 - M1A1 & variants 580 - M1A2 & variants 580 - M1A2 SEP & variants There are many end users with different hardware and/or software configurations Complex configuration management and change control environment 27-28 June 2012

Application Domain Types Embedded Sensor Control and Signal Processing Vehicle Control Vehicle Payload Real Time Embedded Mission Processing Non Embedded Systems Software Automation and Process Control Simulation & Modeling Mission Support Training Test Data Processing 28-28 June 2012

Software Maintenance Change Drivers The factors that cause the changes that are made to an operational software baseline Software changes characterized by: - source of change - type of change - impact of change (scope, complexity, etc.) - priority of implementation Change drivers can impact the operational software configuration, associated sustaining engineering activities, and the implemented maintenance infrastructure Most change requirements are allocated to planned releases per time period Deferred change requirements are defined as backlog Drivers with different characteristics are costed differently 29-28 June 2012

Top Level Change Driver Taxonomy External Drivers Operational User - Functional modifications - Functional additions - Functional deletions Stakeholder - Threat - Mission doctrine - System interoperability - External testing/iv&v - External audits Mandate - Legal/Regulatory/Policy Technology - Technology obsolescence - Infrastructure changes Internal Drivers Legacy - Technical debt - Deferred functionality Maintenance Operations - Maintainer skill set Types of Changes Corrective (identified defects) Preventive (latent faults) Perfective (functional enhancements) Adaptive (new HW/SW environments) 30-28 June 2012

Measures for capability exist - predictions are problematic (aircraft availability, ready for tasking, mission capability, etc.) Difficult to relate the expected capability contribution for a system based on software maintenance investment Multiple and complex factors Measuring Capability Need to relate cost to maintenance outputs - products and services - and be able to accurately predict costs Need to be able to relate products and services to incremental capability improvements - however capability is measured within the domain The is an imperfect workaround based on mission weighted software change backlog (mandatory, mission critical, mission essential, mission enhancing) 31-28 June 2012

Summary The performance factors associated with software maintenance and sustaining engineering are more complex and more interrelated than those in software development These factors all have a bearing on maintenance cost and return on investment in terms of mission capability The technical and business structures applied to software maintenance are significantly diverse We need to define and apply consistent processes and mechanisms across the installed operational software base We need to generate the data required to establish normative cost and output relationships necessary for objective decision making at all levels of the DOD enterprise 32-28 June 2012

Contact Information Jim Judy U.S. Army Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Cost & Economics (ODASA-CE) 5701 21st Street Building 216 Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5546 (703) 697-1612 james.m.judy.civ@mail.mil Jeramia Poland U.S. Army ODASA-CE 5701 21st Street Building 216 Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5546 (703) 697-1640 Jeramia.poland.civ@mail.mil Cheryl Jones U.S. Army RDECOM - ARDEC Quality Engineering & System Assurance RDAR-QES-A Building 62 Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000 (973) 724-2644 cheryl.jones5@us.army.mil Dr. Brad Clark Software Metrics, Inc. 4345 High Ridge Road Haymarket, Va. 20169 (703) 754-0115 brad@software-metrics.com 33-28 June 2012