New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) 40 CFR 60 Subpart OOOO for Storage Tanks

Similar documents
Complying with NSPS Regulations Governing Air Emissions from Natural Gas Well Sites

EPA's Proposed Air Pollution Standards for the Oil and Natural Gas Sector Preliminary Analysis September 2011

Natural Gas STAR Methane Challenge Program: Supplementary Technical Information for ONE Future Commitment Option

DRAFT Procedures for Quantifying Fugitive VOC Emission Sources at Petroleum Facilities

Hydraulic Fracture Pollution Capture: Oil & Gas Production Air Regulations

SPE Abstract. in oil and gas. designs. Introduction On an eight-year. review of the. EPA s Clean. Air Act, includes the first.

40 CFR 98 Subpart W Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

A PENNSYLVANIA FRAMEWORK OF ACTIONS FOR METHANE REDUCTIONS FROM THE OIL AND GAS SECTOR

NSPS OOOOa Fugitive Emissions Requirements

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT April 6, Guidance on Estimating Condensate and Crude Oil Loading Losses from Tank Trucks

MEMORANDUM November 22, Phillip Fielder, P.E., Permits and Engineering Group Manager

How to Develop a Methane Emissions Feasibility and Measurement Study

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. Best Performance Standard (BPS) x.x.xx

State of the Art (SOTA) Manual for Volatile Organic Compound Storage Tanks (greater than or equal to 2,000 gallons)

Oil and Gas Regulations and TCEQ Lessons Learned

EPA Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting Rule. Onshore Petroleum & Natural Gas Production

Santa Barbara County APCD

ENGINEERING ANALYSIS

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Issues for the Oil and Gas Sector ERM 2015 Webinar Series

Vapor Recovery Units: Agenda

ARE PRODUCED WATER EMISSION FACTORS ACCURATE?

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC Compressor Station Whites Creek Pike Page 1

DEVELOPMENT OF 2010 OIL AND GAS EMISSIONS PROJECTIONS FOR THE DENVER-JULESBURG BASIN

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems 2012 Data Summary

Exploring the variability between methods for characterizing flash gas emissions from oil storage tanks

Estimation of Boil-off-Gas BOG from Refrigerated Vessels in Liquefied Natural Gas Plant

CDPHE s Regulation of Oil and Gas Development. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Kent Kuster CDPHE Oil and Gas Liaison

CHAPTER 6: AIR EMISSIONS

DFW SIP Development Update and Oil & Gas Inventory Follow-Up

Methane Recovery from Pneumatic Devices, Vapor Recovery Units and Dehydrators

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program

Environmental Breakout: Regional Perspectives on Environmental Challenges to Controversial Development Projects

e-cfr Data is current as of October 16, 2017

MEMORANDUM June 30, Phillip Fielder, P.E., Permits and Engineering Group Manager

BLM Forum on Venting and Flaring of Gas Produced from Onshore Federal Lands. Statement of Tomás Carbonell

Downsizing a Claus Sulfur Recovery Unit

AKAKUS OIL OPERATIONS- LIBYA Gas Utilization& Flare Emission Reduction Project

APPLICATION FOR AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT/OPERATE

DRAFT. MEMORANDUM March 19, Phillip Fielder, P.E., Permits and Engineering Group Manager,

Pre-Publication Draft - September 21, 2016 APD MARINE LOADING COLLECTION EFFICIENCY GUIDANCE

Qualitative Phase Behavior and Vapor Liquid Equilibrium Core

Minor Source Permitting Guidance for Facilities Subject To Federal Standards

Volatile Organic Compound Emissions Results from DCU Depressurization Vent Testing. Presented by: Chris Weber, Senior Chemist, URS Corporation

MEMORANDUM January 6, Phillip Fielder, P.E., Permits and Engineering Group Manager

PERMIT TO INSTALL. Table of Contents

Natural Gas Processing

Title V. Model General Permit Template SERIES 1 FLARES. Template # SJV-FL-1-1

Workshop EE. Chemical Inventory Reporting Centralizing Calculations to Enhance Compliance. Wednesday, March 28, :00 a.m. to 9:15 p.m.

DRAFT AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO Major Amendment IS ISSUED TO. Miller Milling Co LLC

Opportunities for Methane Emissions Reductions in Natural Gas Production

Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations NSPS 60, Subpart WWW Checklist for Conditions and Requirements Municipal Solid Waste Landfills (MSWLF)

APPENDIX A TECHNICAL SUPPLEMENTS

Staff will monitor Bills as the move through the legislative process

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION DOCUMENTS For DCP Midstream, LP Hamilton Township, Michigan

MEMORANDUM December 9, Phillip Fielder, P.E., Permits and Engineering Group Manager, Air Quality Division

Description [in natural gas volume] Emissions estimated from size of breach / pressure / duration calculation

Equivalent Leak Definitions for Smart LDAR (Leak Detection and Repair) When Using Optical Imaging Technology

Transmission Pipeline Opportunities. Advancing Project Development in India through Public Private Partnerships

Focus on Hydraulic Fracturing

April 25, 2006 Villahermosa, Mexico. Compressors: Agenda

Reducing Methane Emissions from Production Wells: Reduced Emission Completions in Gas Wells; Smart Automation of Gas Well Plunger Lifts

Fast Deliveries Quality Flare Systems Economical Solutions

STATEMENT OF BASIS. NAICS Description: All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing NAICS Code:

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. Policy No Draft Div Pol Yr

POTENTIAL TO EMIT LIMITATIONS FOR PART 70 SOURCES. (Adopted 6/15/1995, revised 1/18/2001 and 1/20/2011)

The Use of Walnut Shell Filtration with Enhanced Synthetic Media for the Reduction and/or Elimination of Upstream Produced Water Treatment Equipment

Natural Gas Development, Including Hydraulic Fracturing ( Fracking ) and Horizontal Drilling

Modular Oil & Gas Equipment Onshore & Offshore

Shell Canada Limited. Shell s Comments for Phase 4: Oral Proceeding Related to Alberta Energy Regulator Proceeding No

Emissions from the Production, Storage, and Transport of Crude Oil and Gasoline

State Of The Art (SOTA) Manual For Non-Hazardous Onsite Remediation Processes

A.6 Boilers. A.6.1 New and Existing Boilers located within AQCR 131

HYSYS WORKBOOK By: Eng. Ahmed Deyab Fares.

Air Pollution Control Program Permits Section

Technical Support Document

Economic Analysis of Methane Emission Reduction Opportunities in the Canadian Oil and Natural Gas Industries

City of Fort Worth s Natural Gas Air Quality Study FINAL REPORT

RELEASE POINT TYPE Enter or select one of the following stack/emission point release orientation: downward

Texas Oil and Gas Air Permitting: A Practitioner s Guide

PRIMARY OR ALTERNATIVE OPERATING SCENARIO

TITLE 35 LEGISLATIVE RULES BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OFFICE OF OIL AND GAS

PART 70 PERMIT TO OPERATE

RULE Federally Enforceable Limits on Potential to Emit - Adopted 1/25/96

MEMORANDUM May 28, Phillip Fielder, P.E., Permits and Engineering Group Manager. Kendal Stegmann, Senior Environmental Manager

Air Permitting for Major Sources/Title V (Part 2)

ROCK CRUSHING PLANT APPLICATIONS ADVICE

Protocol for the estimation of petroleum refinery process plant fugitive VOC emissions

Notice of Construction (NOC) Worksheet

Murphy Oil and Climate Change

Media Filtration of Produced Water in Polymer Flood Applications

Midstream Fundamentals in the Oil and Gas Value Stream

2007 Area Source Emissions Inventory Methodology 310 OIL PRODUCTION FUGITIVE LOSSES

Emergency Engine and Turbine Requirements

Industrial Services. Minimizing Downtime. Maximizing Performance. LDAR. Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) Services

Natural Gas Gathering Lines. John Williams Director Service Monitoring and Enforcement Department

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

MURPHY OIL AND CLIMATE CHANGE Upstream Worldwide Exploration/Production Assets 2016 Emission Data MURPHY OIL CORPORATION 1

2011 Oil and Gas Emission Inventory Enhancement Project for CenSARA States

Steel Tank Structures. By Eric MacFarlane, SE, PE, LEED AP

United States v. Archer Daniels Midland National Clean Air Act Settlement

Transcription:

New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) 40 CFR 60 Subpart OOOO for Storage Tanks A P P L I C A B I L I T Y A N D C O M P L I A N C E Scott R. Smith Smith Management Group Lexington & Louisville (859) 231-8936 x116 Scottr.smith@smithmanage.com

General Applicability Affected Facilities Applicable to NSPS Subpart OOOO Affected Facilities Production Facility (Well Site) Gathering Facility Onshore Gas Transmission Processing Facility Facility Natural Gas Well (hydraulically factured or refractured) X Centrifugal Compressor (using wet seal) X X Reciprocating Compressor X X Natural Gas Driven Pneumatic Controller (continuous bleed) X X X Storage Vessels X X X X Equipment (pump, valve, flange, etc. in VOC/wet service) within a process unit Sweetening units located at onshore natural gas processing plants X X 2

Final Rule Compliance Schedule NSPS OOOO Affected Facility Standard Compliance Date Hydraulically fractured wildcat and delineation wells Hydraulically fractured low pressure non-wildcat and non-delineation wells Complete combustion October 15, 2012 Complete combustion October 15, 2012 Other hydraulically fractured wells Complete combustion Before 1/1/2015 Other hydraulically fractured wells REC and complete combustion After 1/1/2015 Centrifugal compressors with wet seals 95% reduction October 15, 2012 Reciprocating compressors Charge rod packing October 15, 2012 Pneumatic controllers at NG processing plants Zero bleed rate October 15, 2012 Pneumatic controllers between wellhead and NG processing plants 6 scfh bleed rate October 15, 2013 Group 2 and 1 Storage Vessels 95% reduction April 15, 2014/2015 Equipment Leaks LDAR program October 15, 2012 Sweetening Units Reduce SO2 as calculated October 15, 2012

What is a Storage Vessel: Storage Vessel is a tank containing Crude Oil, Condensate, Intermediate hydrocarbon liquids, or Produced Water 4

What does VOC and PTE Mean? VOC = Volatile organic compound Defined by EPA and are generally organic chemical compounds whose composition makes it possible for them to evaporate under normal atmospheric conditions of temperature and pressure. PTE = Potential to emit Maximum or worse-case potential air emissions from a source based on maximum daily throughput (a.k.a. barrels/day or gal/day of production) 5

Tanks in the Program Each single Storage Vessel with a PTE > or = 6 TPY of VOCs and located in the: Oil and natural gas production segment Oil and natural gas gathering segment Natural gas processing segment Natural gas transmission and storage segment 6

Tanks Not In The Program Storage Vessels do not include: Skid mounted or permanently attached to something that is mobile and on site for < 180 consecutive days Process vessels Pressure vessels 7

Storage Vessel Affected Facility Affected Storage Vessels Threshold PTE of VOC emissions > than or = 6 TPY PTE calculated using a generally accepted model or calculation methodology Based on the maximum daily throughput Can rely on enforceable limitations to < 6 TPY VOC PTE based on VOC emissions after any vapor recovery unit (VRU) Group 1 Storage Vessels Constructed/Modified/Reconstructed after Aug 23, 2011 and before April 12, 2013 Group 2 Storage Vessels Constructed/Modified/Reconstructed after April 12, 2013 8

PTE Calculations PTE for each tank requires evaluation to determine if = or > 6 tons/year The total VOC PTE for each tank needs to be evaluated that will generally include three components: flash emissions, working losses and breathing losses. 9

Guidelines for Compliance Develop an inventory of storage tanks installed, modified, or reconstructed after August 23, 2011. Perform emission calculations for applicable storage tanks Accuracy Parameters/inputs to be collected Compliance margin (if any) Evaluate control measures if PTE > = 6 TPY Group 1 storage tanks in first annual report Install Group 2 storage tank controls by April 15, 2014 and Group 1 storage tank controls by April 15, 2015 10

PTE Summary from EPA Condensate Storage Vessels Throughput Cutoff (BOPD) Equivalent Emissions Cutoff (tons/year) a Emission Reduction (tons/year) b 0.5 3.0 2.89 1 6.1 5.77 2 12.2 11.55 5 30.4 28.87 a. Tables from EPA's Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Standards of Performance for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production, Transmission, and Distribution (EPA-453/R-11-002 dated July 2011) and emissions based on the Texas Environmental Research Consortium revised 4/2/2009. b. Calculated using 95 percent reduction.

PTE Summary from EPA Crude Oil Storage Vessels Throughput Cutoff (BOPD) Equivalent Emissions Cutoff (tons/year) a Emission Reduction (tons/year) b 1 0.3 0.28 5 1.5 1.4 20 5.8 5.55 50 14.6 13.87 a. Tables from EPA's Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Standards of Performance for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production, Transmission, and Distribution (EPA-453/R-11-002 dated July 2011) and emissions based on the Texas Environmental Research Consortium revised 4/2/2009. b. Calculated using 95 percent reduction. >=20 BOPD generally accepted threshold for 6 tpy VOC. Please note that the threshold could be < 20 BOPD.

PTE Calculations - Methods Some Methods used to determine PTE: Direct Measurement (working, breathing, flash) Process Simulator Software (HYSIM, HYSIS, VMG, WinSIM Designed II and PROMAX) (flash losses only) E&P Tanks Software designed by American Petroleum Institute (API) (working, breathing, flash) Use option that requires sampling Use geographical database option Vasquez-Beggs Equation (VBE) (flash losses only) EPA Tanks Program Version 4.0.9d developed by API (working and breathing losses) from AP-42. 13

Method Comparison Courtesy: Trinity Consultants

PTE Calculations - Methods To save time and perform an initial estimate of PTE we recommend using the following methods: Vasquez-Beggs Equation (VBE) for flash losses EPA Tanks Program Version 4.0.9d for working and breathing losses Please note that we are still anticipating some guidance from Kentucky DAQ on their approved calculation methods. 15

PTE Calculations - Methods Vasquez-Beggs Equation (VBE) Required Input Data for Flashing Losses: Stock Tank API Gravity (Default 78) Separator Pressure (psig), if any, or inlet pressure Separator Temperature (ºF) (Default 60ºF) Separator Gas Gravity at Initial Condition (Default 0.90) Stock Tank Barrels of Oil per day (BOPD) Stock Tank Gas Molecular Weight (Default 49) Fraction VOC (C3+) of Stock Tank Gas (Default 0.8) Atmospheric Pressure (psia) (Default 14.7)

PTE Calculations - Methods EPA Tanks Program Version 4.0.9d Required Input Data for Working and Breathing Losses (annual): Tank Location (City and State) Type of Tank (vertical/horizontal, fixed roof/floating roof, etc.) Tank Dimensions Shell Height Diameter Liquid Height Average Liquid Height Net Annual Throughput Is tank heated? Paint Characteristics: Shell Color/Shade and Shell Condition Roof Color/Shade and Roof Condition Roof Characteristics (if vertical tank): Type (Cone or Dome) Height Slope (cone roof) Breather Vent Settings Vacuum Settings (psig) Pressure Settings (psig) Tanks Contents (Organic Liquids, Petroleum Distillates, Crude Oil) including speciation and any available information on vapor pressure, liquid molecular weight, vapor molecular weight

Example PTE Calculations Flashing Losses Vasquez-Beggs Equation (VBE) Required Input Data: Stock Tank API Gravity: 29.99ºAPI Separator Pressure (psig): 285.3 psig Separator Temperature (ºF): 200ºF) Separator Gas Gravity at Initial Condition: 0.75 Stock Tank Barrels of Oil per day (BOPD): 20 BOPD Stock Tank Gas Molecular Weight: 50 lb/lb-mole Fraction VOC (C3+) of Stock Tank Gas: 0.9 Atmospheric Pressure (psia): Default 14.7 psia Results: PTE (Flash Emissions) = 21.9 tpy VOC

Example PTE Calculations Working/Breathing Losses EPA Tanks Program Version 4.0.9d Required Input Data: Tank Location (City and State): Louisville, KY Type of Tank (vertical/horizontal, fixed roof/floating roof, etc.): Oil and Gas Vertical Fixed Roof Storage Tank Tank Dimensions Shell Height: 20 feet Diameter: 15.00 feet Liquid Height: 19 feet Average Liquid Height: 15 feet Net Annual Throughput: 306,600.00 gal/year (= 20 BOPD) Is tank heated? No Paint Characteristics: Shell Color/Shade: Gray/Light and Shell Condition: Good Roof Color/Shade: Gray/Light and Roof Condition: Good Roof Characteristics (if vertical tank): Results: Type (Cone or Dome): Cone Height: 3 feet Slope (cone roof): 0.4 ft/ft Breather Vent Settings: Vacuum Settings (psig): -0.03 psig Pressure Settings (psig): 0.03 psig Contents: Crude oil (RVP 5), multiple component liquid using vapor molecular weight of 50 lbs/lb-mole Working Losses: 832.91 lbs/year or 0.416 tons/year Breathing Losses: 791.34 lbs/year or 0.395 tons/year Total VOC PTE: 1,624.25 lbs/year or 0.81 tons/year

Example PTE Calculations Flash emissions = 21.9 tpy VOC Working/Breathing Loss Emissions = 0.81 tpy VOC Total PTE = 22.7 tpy VOC Therefore, if this was a condensate/oil tank that was equipped with a three phase separator upstream then the tank is applicable to NSPS Subpart OOOO. If this was only an atmospheric storage tank with no pressurized separator or other equipment upstream then you would only consider the Working and Breathing loss emissions and the tank would not be applicable to NSPS Subpart OOOO since you are < 6 tpy VOC. Flash emissions do not occur if temperature and pressure differences are 0.

Group 1 Storage Vessel Initial Compliance Determine VOC PTE by October 15, 2013 Initial Notification identifying location of each Group 1 vessel along with Initial report by January 15, 2014 Comply (install capture and controls) by April 15, 2015 21

Group 2 Storage Vessel Initial Compliance Determine VOC PTE by the later of April 15, 2014 or 30 days after start up Reduce VOC emissions by 95% the later of by April 15, 2014 or within 60 days after start up Comply (install capture and controls) by the later of April 15, 2014 or 60 days after start up 22

Group 1 Storage Vessel Continuous Compliance Reduce VOC emissions by 95% by April 15, 2015 through the use of control device or floating roof or May remove control device* and maintain uncontrolled VOC to < 4 TPY after demonstrating that uncontrolled VOC emissions have been < 4 TPY for 12 consecutive months Uncontrolled VOC emissions determined on a monthly basis thereafter using average throughput for the month 23

Group 2 Storage Vessel Continuous Compliance May remove control device* and maintain uncontrolled VOC to < 4 TPY after demonstrating that uncontrolled VOC emissions have been < 4 TPY for 12 consecutive months Uncontrolled VOC emissions determined on a monthly basis thereafter using average throughput for the month 24

Continuous Compliance (Group 1 & 2) *Control device must be reinstalled if : Well feeding the storage vessel undergoes fracturing or re fracturing: Reduce VOC emissions by 95% as soon as liquids from the well are routed to the storage vessel If VOC emissions increase to > 4 TPY without fracturing or re fracturing Reduce VOC emissions by 95% within 30 days of the determination 25

Continuous Compliance (Group 1 & 2) If storage vessels have controls, they must Reduce emissions by 95% Be covered, and have closed vent system Meet prescriptive performance testing requirements Meet prescriptive continuous monitoring requirements 26

Options for VOC Recovery Activated Carbon Flaring Vapor Recovery Unit

Existing Tank Setup Before VOC System Upgrade Courtesy: Country Mark

VOC Equipment Upgrade Re-plumb tank vents Thief hatch seal Courtesy: Country Mark

Control Options: Activated Carbon PROS Costs Safety Better public perception CONS Viable for less than 1,000 ppm vapor streams. Creates a waste product that must be disposed of. We are working on developing a standard application for pricing purposes. Contact at Calgon Carbon Corporation: James P. Gray Phone: (412) 787-6841 (office) or (412) 956-7885 (cell) Email: jgray@calgoncarbon-us.com www.calgoncarbon.com

Information Needed for Standard Application

Control Options: Flaring/Combustion PROS Available for large producers Relatively easy operation Can handle fluctuations in concentration, flow rate, heating value, etc. Efficient (approx. 95% efficient) Less expensive than VRU CONS Safety Permit may be required May cause loss of product Public perception environmental issues Creates secondary pollutants

Performance Testing Combustion Control Devices Manufacturers Performance Test NSPS OOOO and MACT HH/HHH Manufacturer Model Number Date of Performance Test Submittal Control Device Demonstrates Performance Requirements (Y/N) 3 Abutec SCUF MTF 0.7 02/12/2013 * * COMM Engineering SCUF MTF 2.7 02/13/2013 * * COMM OOOO Combustor 200 03/06/2013 * * Cimmaron CEI 1-24 05/08/2013 * * CEI 1-30 05/08/2013 * * CEI 1-48 05/08/2013 * * CEI 1-60 05/08/2013 * * Leed Fabrication LDF3096 24 7/22/2013 * * LDF3096 36 7/22/2013 * * LDF3096 48 7/22/2013 * * Maximum Inlet Flow Rate 4 * Blank cells indicate that a decision has yet to be made on the status of the performance test.

Control Options: Vapor Recovery PROS Environmental perception Effective (approx. 95% reduction in VOC emissions) Salable gas product CONS May cause fluctuations in vapor loading Expensive May still need to flare or vent Operator must provide evidence of compliance Must have sufficient electrical service Safety concerns Must have storage tank and/ or gathering line available

VRU Installation Typical Layout Courtesy: Country Mark

Vapor Recovery Unit Courtesy: Country Mark

Large Vapor Combustor Courtesy: Country Mark

Optional Emergency Flare Courtesy: Country Mark

Recordkeeping VOC PTE determination for each storage vessel with calculation methodology and/or calculation model used Deviations from requirements Mobile vessel consecutive days on site If removed and returned or replaced within 30 days, entire period will count as consecutive days Closed vent system inspections and results Control devices: Minimum and maximum operating parameter values Continuous parameter monitoring data Results of all compliance calculations Results of all inspections 39

Reporting Initial annual report due January 15, 2014 (Group 1) Future annual reports due on the same date each year Annual report may coincide with Title V report if all elements of annual report are included A common schedule for reports may be submitted provided the schedule does not extend the reporting period 40

Reporting Report must contain Storage vessel information such as Identification and location of each storage vessel affected facility constructed, modified, or reconstructed during the period Documentation of VOC emission rates Records of deviations that occurred during the reporting period Identification of each Group 1 storage vessel with location coordinates Compliance statement regarding initial compliance requirements Storage vessel affected facilities removed from service* Storage vessel affected facilities returned to service* Results of Performance Test if using control devices 41

Reporting Storage vessels removed from service Submit notification in annual report identifying all affected vessels that are removed from service during the period Storage vessels returning to service If returning to service and associated with fracturing Comply with control requirement options immediately Submit notification in annual report If returning to service and not associated with fracturing Determine VOC emissions within 30 days If uncontrolled VOC emissions > 4 TPY must comply with control requirements within 60 days of return to service Submit notification in annual report 42

Summary: Demonstrate Initial Compliance Determine potential VOC emission rate Reduce VOC emissions as required Meet control requirements Submit required notification information Maintain required records Submit Group 1 notifications 43

Demonstrate Continuous Compliance Reduce VOC emissions by 95% Maintain uncontrolled VOC to < 4 TPY If storage vessels have controls, they must Reduce emissions by 95% Be covered, and have closed vent system Meet prescriptive performance testing requirements Meet prescriptive continuous monitoring requirements 44

Best Option to Avoid Subpart OOOO!! This is important specifically for facilities on the borderline of 6 TPY limit (between 5-8 TPY) Prior to calculation determination date (October 15, 2013 for Group 1 and April 15, 2014 for Group 2), Permitting out of NSPS Subpart OOOO for storage tanks by limiting PTE to <6 TPY with federally enforceable limits or Accept restrictions in state-issued permits to keep VOC < 6 TPY or limit on production or Install VRUs or control devices and follow monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the state issued permits 45

Deadlines to Remember October 15, 2013: Group 1 Storage Vessels PTE Determination January 15, 2014: First annual report Include Group 1 storage vessels April 15, 2014: PTE and compliance for Group 2 storage tanks April 15, 2015: Compliance for Group 1 storage tanks 46

OSHA & The Oil Patch U.S. OSHA is paying attention to EPAs rules. Kentucky s wells are regulated by KY OSHA. KY OSHA gets involved when there are fatalities, increases in accidents and injuries.

What to Do to Avoid OSHA Violations Review applicable standards, Health & Safety Plans and employee training. Management of gases from oil and gas operations Flares and other emission management techniques Oil & Gas Well drilling and Servicing etool: https://www.osha.gov/sltc/etools/oilandgas/index.html

Questions SMG has created a checklist for determining applicability Contact Information: Scott R. Smith Smith Management Group (859) 231-8936 ext. 116 scottr.smith@smithmanage.com 49