EDF DECOMMISSIONING PROGRAMME - A PREREQUISITE FOR THE ERECTION OF NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN FRANCE

Similar documents
Operational Decommissioning Experience in France Radioactive Waste Management and Radiation Protection Issues

Dismantling of nuclear facilities in France: what is at stake?

HOW R&D MAY HELP TO IMPROVE RP PERFORMANCE AT THE DECOMMISSIONING STAGE OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANT?

The EnBW Strategyfor Decommissioningand DismantlingofNuclearPower Plants»

D AND D PROJECTS HOW TO ORGANIZE THE TRANSITION PERIOD

Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities. The Decommissioning Process. Lesson Objectives. Decommissioning. Decontamination. Decommissioning Objective

Decommissioning the North Korean Nuclear Facilities: Approaches and Costs 1

Long term trends in nuclear production technologies. Noel Camarcat

WM2014 Conference, March 2 6, 2014, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Decommissioning three main strategies: Immediate dismantling, Safe enclosure (Deferred dismantling), Entombment

Expected Waste Streams Originating from the Decommissioning of NPPs: German Situation as Compared to International Standards 16447

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

VLLW : Characterization and recycling for sustainable development. IAEA Conférence Tarragona, Fébruary 2009

Packaging for Transport of the ILW-LL of EDF First Generation Power Plant Dismantling 16517

Joint ICTP-IAEA School on Nuclear Energy Management. 15 July - 3 August, Lecture Notes. I. Mele IAEA, Vienna, Austria

RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMMES IN OECD/NEA MEMBER COUNTRIES FRANCE [2016] Nuclear Energy & Radioactive Waste Management

Best practices for preparing vessel internals segmentation projects

40 Years of operation of Near Surface Repositories. Andra Experience.

WM2015 Conference, March 15-19, 2015, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Applicability of EPRI Decommissioning Pre-Planning Manual to International Decommissioning Projects

Clearance, Reuse, Recycle, disposal as VLLW.

The Meuse/Haute Marne Centre : Underground Research Laboratory Technological Exhibition Facility

Expected roles of nuclear energy in France s energy policy

Radioactive Waste Management at the NCSR Demokritos - Greece

TOPICAL SESSION MANAGEMENT OF DECOMMISSIONING WASTES

Decommissioning in Germany: Greifswald NPPs. Bernd Rehs Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS)

IAEA/JAEA INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

Decommissioning Worldwide and NEA Activities

DECOMMISSIONING EXPERIENCE IN SPAIN. Manuel Rodríguez Silva

Adapting Dismantling and Decommissioning Strategies to a Variety of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities 12237

Plant Life Management in Transition from Operation to Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants. National experience, Finland.

Transport of French PWR Steam Generators to Very Low Level Waste Disposal 15203

DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES IN UKRAINE

LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DECOMMISSIONING IN SLOVAK REPUBLIC

Disposal Options for Radioactive Waste

Nuclear Waste Governance in Italy

Radioactive Waste Disposal. Piero Risoluti

International Cooperation in the NFC Back End in Ukraine: benefits and challenges Mr. NEZHURA Maxim Head of Analytical Section

D&D of Nuclear Power Plants - Global Emerging Issues and Strategies

Decommissioning and Site Release Problems for Georgian Nuclear Research Reactor IRT-M

Andra s Responses to the Public Debate on the Cigeo Geological Repository Project

TECHNICAL MEETING ON TECHNICAL SUPPORT ORGANIZATION (TSO) ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES May 2013

EDF & the nuclear renewal : the Flamanville 3 model. Jean-Claude Prenez Director for International Projects EDF Nuclear Engineering Division

WM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona USA. Factors Impacting Decommissioning Costs 13576

Education and Training in Nuclear Decommissioning

Decommissioning Planning

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS for protecting people and the environment. Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste from Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities

high-level radioactive waste in Korea include Law No "Nuclear Safety Act", Nuclear Safety Commission Regulation No. 14 "Rules on Technical Stan

EDF GROUP PRESENTATION

ICFD Session 2, Cost Estimation Stockholm, Sweden - 21 September 2016 Michael Lackey P.E. Vice President - Nuclear Operations

Alec Kimber Australian Nuclear Science & Technology Organisation

INPP Decommissioning Overview Darius Janulevičius

Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities: The Work Ahead and How to Succeed

ICEM DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENVI SIMULATOR TO ESTIMATE KOREAN SNF FLOW AND ITS COST

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS for protecting people and the environment. Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste from Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities

Closing the fuel cycle and Managing nuclear waste

ADVANCED DECOMMISSIONING COSTING CALCULATION TOOLS FOR PILOT VIENNA TRIGA MARK-II RESEARCH REACTOR

The Cigeo project. Meuse/Haute-Marne reversible geological disposal facility for radioactive waste. Public debate of 15 May to 15 October 2013

International Conference on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management

TROJAN DECOMMISSIONING STATUS. OPUC Meeting March 8, 2005 (draft)

REGULATORY CHALLENGES IN RELATION TO URANIUM LEGACY IN FRANCE

The Chernobyl shelter industrial site, where the New Safe Confinement will be constructed (Photos: PMU)

Calorimetry for radioactive waste characterization

IAEA-TECDOC-1572 Disposal Aspects of Low and Intermediate Level Decommissioning Waste

Lessons to be learnt from the French nuclear program

KINECTRICS QUALITY PROGRAM FORM QF R1304 RSP Title: International Benchmarking on Decommissioning Strategies File: K R0

ROMANIA National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control (CNCAN) Report. on in Decommissioning Activities. Dr. Lucian BIRO Director General

Dismantling Techniques applied at MZFR

WASTE MANAGEMENT for FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI Some considerations from afar

LATIN AMERICAN NUCLEAR ENERGY STAKEHOLDERS CONFERENCE NATIONAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PNGRR) CNEA

Status Report on IDN Activities

Nuclear Energy in France Current Trends and Impact on the Bilateral Ties with Japan

Status of Decommissioning Preparation for Kori #1

Geological Disposal Through Global Collaboration

RESEARCH REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING PLAN

Safety Research for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste Generated by Decommissioning of of Nuclear Power Facilities

The Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN - Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire),

Nuclear Fuel cycle with AREVA. I. LEBOUCHER VP Marketing Fuel recycling September 29, 2010

Vice President, GDF SUEZ Nuclear Activities May 13, 2010

Greifswald Project Introduction/Experience summary Axel Bäcker

NUCLEAR FUEL AND REACTOR

2. CURRENT STATUS Koeberg nuclear power plant

ANICCA CODE AND THE BELGIAN NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE

RESEARCH REACTOR FRJ-1 (MERLIN) THE CORE STRUCTURES OF THE REACTOR BLOCK ARE DISMANTLED

Decommissioning Group Ketut Kamajaya

INPRO TM Towards Nuclear Energy System Sustainability Waste Management and Environmental Stressors

The Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN),

WM 2010 Conference, March 7-11, 2010 Phoenix, AZ

Preparation for Future Defuelling and Decommissioning Works on EDF Energy s UK Fleet of Advanced Gas Cooled Reactors

Decommissioning, Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel Management in Slovakia

India s HWR Activities S.G.Ghadge Executive Director (Reactor Safety & Analysis) Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited

Spent Fuel Management in Slovakia

France s Nuclear Energy : Status and Prospects

The French geological disposal project Cigéo: A converging approach

Lessons learned from events reported in 2009 and 2010

CURRENT STATUS ON FAST REACTOR PROGRAM IN KAZAKHSTAN

Sweden s nuclear fuel cycle policy

RADIOACTIVE GRAPHITE MANAGEMENT AT UK MAGNOX NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS. G. HOLT British Nuclear Fuels plc, Berkeley, United Kingdom 1.

A Radiation Protection Perspective- Decommissioning of the Moata Reactor. Biological Shield Dismantling

Transcription:

EDF DECOMMISSIONING PROGRAMME - A PREREQUISITE FOR THE ERECTION OF NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN FRANCE J.-J. Grenouillet Electricité de France Dismantling, Waste management & Environment Engineering Center ABSTRACT Nowadays, decommissioning of nuclear power plants has become a key issue for nuclear industry in Europe. The phasing out of nuclear energy in Germany, Belgium and Sweden, as well as the early closure of nuclear units in applicant countries in the frame of EU enlargement, has largely contributed to consider decommissioning as the next challenge to face. The situation is slightly different in France where nuclear energy is still considered as a safe, cost-effective and environment friendly energy source. Electricité de France (EDF) is working on the development of a new generation of reactor to replace the existing one and erection of a new nuclear power plant could start in the next few years. Nevertheless, to achieve this objective, it will be necessary to get the support of political decision-makers and the acceptance of public opinion. Due to the growing concern of these stakeholders for environmental issues, their support can only be obtained if it is possible to demonstrate that nuclear energy industry will not leave behind unsolved issues that will be a burden to the next generations. In this context decommissioning of the first generation of EDF NPPs constitutes a prerequisite for the erection of a new type of nuclear power plant. This paper will present the programme defined by EDF for the decommissioning of its nine already shutdown reactors. The reasons of the recent evolution of EDF decommissioning strategy will be explained and the key issues that will contribute to the successful implementation of this programme will be addressed. Finally, what has been achieved on sites so far and major planned activities will be described. INTRODUCTION EDF has nine of its nuclear power plants which have been definitively shutdown and which are currently under decommissioning. Most of them are first generation units which started operating in the 60s and were definitively shutdown at the end of the 80s or at the beginning of the 90s mainly for economical reasons. They were not competitive against the new type of reactors under erection at this time ( PWR 1300 MW and N4 series). CHOOZ A Brennilis St-Laurent A Bugey 1 PWR GCR FBR HWR Chinon A Creys - Malville Fig. 1 Localisation of definitely shutdown NPPs in France

Table I Operation characteristics of EDF s shutdown units Unit Reactor type Capacity Operation Life Brennilis HWR 70 MW 1967/1985 Chinon A1 GCR 70 MW 1963/1973 Chinon A2 GCR 200 MW 1965/1985 Chinon A3 GCR 480 MW 1966/1990 St Laurent A1 GCR 480 MW 1971/1992 St Laurent A2 GCR 515 MW 1972/1994 Bugey 1 GCR 540 MW 1971/1992 Chooz A PWR 300 MW 1967/1991 Creys-Malville (Superphenix) FBR 1240 MW 1986/1996 EDF DECOMMISSIONING STRATEGY Until January 2001, EDF's policy regarding the dismantling of its decommissioned nuclear power plants was to reach "level 2" (release of non-nuclear facilities) about 10 years after final shutdown and to postpone final dismantling for another 30-40 years to take advantage of radioactive decay. This strategy was satisfying 3 categories of stakeholders: The owner, because expenses were deferred, The operator, because there is still some activity on site The regulatory body because decision about final storage solutions could be postponed Only public opinion was suspicious about the real possibility to return to green fields in a reasonable timeframe. Today, EDF considers that, if the nuclear option is to remain open, it is necessary to deal with increasing public opinion concerns for environmental and waste management issues. EDF and the nuclear industry have thus to demonstrate their ability to control the back end of nuclear power plants life cycle. Therefore, EDF decided in 2001 to achieve total dismantling of all nine already shutdown reactors in the next 25 years. This new strategy will provide the tangible demonstration of the feasibility of dismantling, from the industrial, waste disposal and financial (adequate funding) points of view. There are several benefits to this more aggressive strategy: It will allow addressing safety- and environment-related issues as yet unresolved. The cost of dismantling first generation units will already have been met when comes the time to invest in the renewal of the operating PWR units. Last, it will also provide the opportunity for structuring the industrial organization and preparedness (engineering and industrial) on which to rely for the final dismantling of the existing PWR units beyond 2020 (32 units). To implement this strategy, EDF decided in 2001 to set up an new Engineering Department, CIDEN (French acronym for Decommissioning and Environment Engineering Department), with 2/3 of the activity of its 400 employees dedicated to decommissioning.

EDF DECOMMISSIONING PROGRAMME An overall programme has been established by EDF for the decommissioning of the 9 EDF units already shutdown with the objective to provide a global and optimized approach on important issues such as waste management and resources allocation (financing, engineering and work capacity). It has to be completed in 2025 and comprises two stages: 1. The first stage includes: Final dismantling of Brennilis (green fields) in 2015 A dismantling demonstration of a PWR reactor building (Chooz A) before starting replacing the population of PWRs currently in operation Final dismantling of reactor containment of a GCR (Bugey 1) as a first of its kind 2. The second stage includes: Dismantling of following 5 GCR units (Saint-Laurent A1&A2, Chinon A1,A2 & A3) Final dismantling of Chooz A and Bugey 1 in 2025 3 billions Euros will be invested by EDF in the next 25 years to implement this programme. Figure 2 below shows the programme cost breakdown according to the main categories of expenditures. Total cost : 3 billions Euros Site Engineering 10% 20% Works 45% Waste 25% Fig. 2 Programme cost breakdown Figure 3 shows the quantity of waste generated by the programme. Very Low Level Wastes (VLLW) are mostly concrete coming from the demolition of the nuclear buildings. 65% Wastes VLLW LLW Graphite LLW Long Lived 27% 0,2% 8% Fig. 3 Wastes generated

The successful implementation of this programme relies on: The simplification of regulatory processes and procedures The availability of treatment, conditioning and disposal facilities for specific categories of wastes (graphite, sodium, long-lived, ) An effective nuclear industry (contractors and suppliers) that will ensure the technical, cost and schedule aspects of this programme. Availability on time of waste solutions is of the utmost importance. Among them, the main critical issues are: Opening of a Very Low Level Wastes disposal in 2003 (130 000 tons) Opening of a new disposal for graphite wastes ( 17 000 tons) in 2010 Opening in 2007-2008 of a centralised interim storage facility for long-lived Medium Level Wastes (500 tons including filters, control rods, reactor internals for example) Spent fuel storage is not an issue for the implementation of EDF decommissioning programme because, except for CREYS-MALVILLE where an interim storage is already in operation, all the spent fuel produced by the unit under decommissioning has been reprocessed. In order to secure the execution of the decommissioning programme EDF is considering the possibility to erect buffer storage facilities on site to mitigate the impact of potential delay in the licensing and commissioning of the new facilities. Regarding the closely concerned and related issue, namely disposal of high-level radioactive waste (HLW), the socalled 1991 Bataille Law defined three prospective investigations that were to be carried out before 2006. Waste transmutation (CEA mission with assistance from EDF), sub-surface storage and deep geological repository (under ANDRA responsibility).these possibilities are all open and under investigation and EDF intends to be active in all issues. Because its responsibility as nuclear operator is at stakes, but also because it will have to bear the cost of waste disposal, EDF is becoming more and more involved in these projects. The regulatory process has recently been simplified. When 3 authorisations were needed to cover all the decommissioning process, now only one decree is required. To obtain this decree, a safety case has to be elaborated and submitted to the Safety Authority. It comprises the following documents: Justification of final state of the site and main steps of the dismantling process Safety Analysis Report Operating rules for monitoring and maintenance Emergency plan Environmental Impact Assessment Waste management studies To avoid to apply for a new decree when minor modifications are required, which will undoubtedly occur within such a long and complex process, an internal organisation has been set up by EDF and accepted by the French Regulatory Body to deliver internal authorisations for modification of the Safety Analysis Report and the operating rules as far as they remain in accordance with the safety case submitted for the issue of the decree. For each modification a safety analysis has to be documented and reviewed by an internal committee whose members are not involved in the operation of the plant. The authorisation is delivered by the operator of the plant taking into account the recommendations of the committee. French Safety Authority have to be informed after the authorisation has been delivered and they can audit this committee.

ACHIEVEMENTS AND CURRENT ACTIVITIES ON SITES NEXT STEPS BRENNILIS HWR BRENNILIS will be the first EDF NPP to be fully dismantled with a definite release of the site. Dismantling activities started in 1997 with the dismantling of electromechanical equipment from auxiliary buildings and the conditioning of dismantling wastes. These wastes are now shipped to a final repository operated by ANDRA (Centre de Stockage de l Aube) or to a melting and incineration facility (CENTRACO). The remediation and demolition of auxiliary buildings started in 2000 and will be finished in 2004. In order to reduce the volume of radwastes to be treated, the contamination is removed from concrete walls by hands-on or remote techniques. Thus the remaining structures can be considered as conventional wastes. The buildings are then demolished with conventional techniques and the rubbles are unconditionally released. The French Safety Authority has approved this procedure and a first nuclear building has been demolished in April 2002. The studies for the final dismantling of the reactor building have started this year and will be finished in 2004. The objective is to start the dismantling of the rector vessel in 2007 and to complete it in 2012. After remediation of the reactor building, its demolition will start in 2015. At this time the site will be cleared from any nuclear regulation and will be rehabilitated 2004 2007 2012 2015 Dismantling of Reactor Building equipment Reactor Vessel dismantling Building remediation Conventional demolition CHINON A 2 GCR Fig. 4 The dismantling stages planned for the dismantling of BRENNILIS reactor building. As a result of EDF previous decommissioning strategy, CHINON A 2 has reached the level 2 of the decommissioning process defined by IAEA i.e. Restricted Site Release. The conventional island has been demolished and most of the nuclear electromechanical equipment has been dismantled as to reduce the safe enclosure perimeter and surveillance activities. Only the reactor vessel and the heat exchangers are remaining. They will be dismantled after the dismantling of the BUGEY 1 reactor containment which will constitute a first of its kind for EDF GCRs. The graphite is temporally stored in the reactor vessel and some of the dismantled electromechanical equipment is temporally stored in the Safe Enclosure. BUGEY 1 - GCR Site Clearance Last of the graphite-moderated reactors built by EDF, Bugey 1 was shutdown in 1994. It is an integrated reactor where the heat exchangers are located under the core, both being integrated into a huge pre-stressed concrete block

whose walls are 7 meters thick. As a result of this particular design, most of the equipment outside this concrete block is not contaminated and has been dismantled. Removal of graphite fuel cladding packages started in 2002 and partial dismantling involved with decommissioning work is expected to be completed by the end of this year. The studies for the dismantling of the reactor building started last year. Some samples were taken from inside the reactor concrete block and from the walls in order to characterize the contamination and activation of the materials. The dismantling works will start in 2008 to be completed in 2015. CHOOZ A PWR The Chooz A NPP is located in the Ardennes region and was definitively shutdown in 1991. It is the first French PWR unit involved in a deconstruction program. A unique feature of this site is that the reactor and its auxiliaries are installed in two rock caves excavated in a hill. The unloading of the reactor started immediately after final shutdown and removal of spent fuel from the site was completed by 1995. After that, the safety systems related to the cooling of spent fuel were decommissioned, the circuits were drained and the spent fuel pool was decontaminated. In 1999, EDF was authorized by the French regulatory body to start the activities leading to the transformation of the plant to a Safe Enclosure as requested by the previous decommissioning strategy. The primary circuit was disconnected from the remaining part of the installation so as to confine most of the radioactive materials. The Demolition of conventional island started in 2002 and dismantling work in nuclear auxiliary buildings located on the top of the hill was completed by the end of last year. After remediation, the buildings are considered as conventional buildings and will be demolished using conventional techniques. As a result of EDF new strategy, studies for the dismantling of equipment located in the two rock caves were anticipated and started in 2003. Dismantling works of the reactor vessel will start in 2006 to be completed in 2014. CONCLUSION Three years after the decision was taken to accelerate the decommissioning programme of its definitely shutdown power plants, the first achievements make EDF confident that the conditions are favourably settled to implement this programme under satisfactory industrial conditions of safety, radioprotection, wastes management, economics. The increasing mobilisation of EDF for the decommissioning of its already shutdown NPPs shows its willingness to demonstrate its capacity to control the nuclear life cycle from end to end. The successful implementation of its decommissioning programme will not mean the end of nuclear energy in France but it will constitute a pre-requisite for the erection of new nuclear power plants in France.