An Economic Comparison of AI and Bull Breeding

Similar documents
Placing: 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th

Development of an Economic Breeding Index EBI for Ireland. Ross Evans (ICBF)

Dairy Reproduction Benchmarks. J.W. Smith, W.D. Gilson, L.O. Ely and W.M. Graves Animal and Dairy Science Department

CULLING: REPLACEMENT HEIFER STRATEGIES

Herd Summary Definitions

Reproductive Management of Commercial Beef Cows. Ted G. Dyer, Extension Animal Scientist

2/22/2012. Impact of Genomics on Dairy Cattle Breeding. Basics of the DNA molecule. Genomic data revolutionize dairy cattle breeding

Improving Genetics in the Suckler Herd by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee

TAKE HOME MESSAGES Illinois Parameter < 18,000 18,000 22,000 > 22,000

Using EPDs in a Commercial Herd

Conformation Assessment

What s Driving Dairy Profitability. Greg Bethard, Ph.D. GPS Dairy Consulting, LLC Blacksburg, VA

ONTHLY BEEF MANAGEMENT CALENDAR & WORKBOOK

Beef Cattle Handbook

Big Data, Science and Cow Improvement: The Power of Information!

Use of data from electronic milking meters and perspective in use of other objective measures

Association of Genomic Selection with Culling and Replacements

Objectives. Economic Comparison of Conventional vs. Intensive Heifer Rearing Systems. Problems with the Historical Approach to Rearing Calves

Raising the Bar on Calf & Heifer Feeding & Management. Jim Barmore, M.Sc., PAS Nutrition & Management Consulting Verona, WI

Improving fertility through management and genetics.

Making sense of the numbers

MONITORING HEIFER PROGRAMS

Breeding for Profit from Beef Production ( )

Delivering Valued Genomic Products to Livestock Customers

DAIRY ANIMAL PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM With HERDMAN

Philippine Dairy Buffalo Breeding Program

Understanding Results

WHETHER dealing with a commercial

Maximize milk component production

Bull Management and Nutrition

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Fundamentals of Genomic Selection

Establishment of a Single National Selection Index for Canada

MCA/MSU Bull Evaluation Program 2016 Buyer Survey and Impact Report

BREEDPLAN EBVs The Traits Explained

Understanding and Using Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)

More cattle are being marketed on carcass. Selection for Carcass Merit. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle IX: Genetics of Carcass Merit

Got Milk? An Economic Look at Cow Size and Milk. July 13 th, 2015

The Data Which Breeders May Collect For BREEDPLAN Analysis Includes: Flight time (from bail head to light beam)

Dairy Cattle Backgrou d I for atio

Long Calving Seasons. Problems and Solutions

COW/CALF DAYS 2015 NICOLE KENNEY-RAMBO

Abstract. 1. Introduction

MILK. U.S. daily milk production is million gallons. Youth across the nation drink % of all milk consumed. oldest

Dairy Production and Management Benchmarks

Internal Herd Growth Generating Profits through Management

Selecting a Beef System by Pearse Kelly

Using Live Animal Carcass Ultrasound Information in Beef Cattle Selection

Beef BRP Manual 11. Managing replacement heifers for Better Returns

The new infrastructure for cattle and sheep breeding in Ireland.

MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS OF NATURAL SERVICE BULLS IN DAIRY HERDS

Individual Genomic Prediction Report

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XVIII December 9, 10, 11, 2003, Mitchell Nebraska

Breeding Program of the Bulgarian Murrah Buffalo

Managing Dairy Heifers Profitably in a Pasture System Denis Turner Turner s Heifer Haven Hartville, Missouri

Heifer Development Goals

DAIRY ANIMAL PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM With HERDMAN

TECHNICAL BULLETIN December 2017

Australian Hereford Selection Indexes

Environmental factors such as matching cows to their environment, heat stress and immunity to disease affect herd fertility.

19. WORLD SIMMENTAL FLECKVIEH CONGRESS. The robust Fleckvieh cow breeding for fitness and health

Genetics of dairy production

IRISH CATTLE BREEDING FEDERATION

Sexed Semen: economics of a new technology

Relationship of Cow Size to Nutrient Requirements and Production Management Issues 1

Production Measures for Cow Herd Performance

1999 American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting

Illinois 4-H Livestock Record

29 th Annual BIC Bull Sale

Management Basics for Beef Markets. Bethany Funnell, DVM Purdue College of Veterinary Medicine

Value-Based Marketing for Feeder Cattle. By Tom Brink, Top Dollar Angus, Inc.

Fertility Factors Fertility Research: Genetic Factors that Affect Fertility By Heather Smith-Thomas

Welcome to Igenity Brangus and the Power of Confident Selection

COW PRODUCTION MONTHLY REPORT

IMPACT OF SEED STOCK SELECTION ON THE ECONOMICS OF A COW-CALF OPERATION

Grade Level: 11/12. Year A R14 The Seven Cs of Learning

LOW INPUT, HIGH OUTPUT MANAGEMENT Issue 6 PRACTICES FOR BEEF COW/CALF HERDS June 1990

Nichols Farms. Angus 8/12. Private Treaty Bull Sale 64 Years of. Superior Beef Genetics

BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEM GUIDELINES. Animal & Grassland Research & Innovation Programme

More Feed = More Milk. Dry Matter Intake Used To Express Feed. Intake ASC-135. Donna M. Amaral-Phillips, Roger W. Hemken, and William L.

2016 Iowa FFA Dairy Cattle Evaluation CDE Test

Benchmark Angus. Engineering Superior Beef

Upper Midwest Devon Cattle Workshop & Sale

BLUP and Genomic Selection

Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle

Breeding Great Cows... The Science and Art. Morgan Lundy. Jefferson, WI

Background and Assumptions

2007 PLANNING BUDGETS FOR DAIRY PRODUCTION IN MISSISSIPPI COSTS AND RETURNS. 112 and 250 COW DAIRY ENTERPRISES LARGE BREED CATTLE MISSISSIPPI, 2007

MONTHLY HERD SUMMARY REPORT

Production Records for Cow/Calf Producers Sandy Johnson, Beef specialist Bob Weaber, Cow/calf specialist

Genomic selection +Sexed semen +Precision farming = New deal for dairy farmers?

The development of breeding strategies for the large scale commercial dairy sector in Zimbabwe

CP total (g) = CP maintenance + CP milk [5] CP maintenance (g) = x BW x BW 2 [6]

Impact of Dry Period Length

Cost Analysis of Implementing a Synchronization or AI Program-Using Decision-Aid Tools

THE 30-DAY GAME CHANGER: IMPROVING REPRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY AND PROFITABILITY OF BEEF HERDS. G. Cliff Lamb

Optimization of dairy cattle breeding programs using genomic selection

Nordic NTM promotion

Transcription:

An Economic Comparison of AI and Bull Breeding Mike Schutz, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Dairy Extension Specialist Department of Animal Sciences Purdue University

Decline in AI Usage Lack of trained employees after expansion Reduction of technician service Sale of calves and purchase of all replacements High milk production & negative energy balance genetics rations rbst

NAHMS: May 1996 Part I: Reference of Dairy Management Practices 45.4% of dairy operations use no AI 34.8% use 1 herd bull 16.9% use 2 to 4 herd bulls 2.9% use 5 or more herd bulls

Table 1. Hoard s Dairyman market survey, 1991. Use of AI and herd size (from Funk, 1994). Yes No Herd Size Herds % Herds Do you use AI? <50 cows 146 85 26 50 to 99 cows 178 92 16 100 to 249 cows 64 87 10 >250 cows 21 91 2 Are 100 % of your cows bred AI? <50 cows 122 84 24 50 to 99 cows 121 68 57 100 to 249 cows 44 69 20 >250 cows 8 38 13 Are 100% of your heifers bred AI? <50 cows 110 75 36 50 to 99 cows 101 57 77 100 to 249 cows 20 31 44 >250 cows 6 29 15 % 15 8 13 9 16 32 31 62 25 43 69 71

Why Natural Service Sires? Eliminate need for heat detection outsourcing heat detection to the bull No investment in AI equipment or facilities Semen costs are too high

Important Economic Considerations Foregone genetic improvement Dry cow management Risk of dystocia Transmission of reproductive diseases Risk of infertile bulls Human Safety

Foregone Genetic Improvement Predicted Transmitting Abilities Milk Fat Protein SCS MIM USDA AIPL PTAM PTAF PTAP PTASCS PTAPL Net Merit $

Foregone Genetic Improvement Predicted Transmitting Abilities A PTAM of +1500 means a bull is expected to have daughters that will average 1500 lbs. more milk than the average cow born in 1990. Ranks and differences between bulls are most important. Net Merit $ = 10 x Production, 4 x Productive life, and -1 x Somatic Cell Score.

Foregone Genetic Improvement Young Sires: Milk Fat Prod. Life Net Merit $ AI BULLS + 790 +30 +0.9 + 87 Non AI Bulls + 311 +12 +0.7 + 40 AI Advantage + 479 +18 +0.2 + 47 Active AI +1422 +47 +1.4 +138 8-98 USDA-DHIA Actual differences may be larger Restricting to 70th percentile of AI bulls would add $20 to the active AI advantage Genetic gains are cumulative

Worksheet 1. Evaluating the Use of a Herd Bull (adapted from: M. A. Faust, Iowa State University) A. Purchase price of Bull $ 1200 B. Bull slaughter value $ 1100 C. Bull mortality based on 2% death loss (B x.98) $ 1078 D. Years bull is kept yr. 1.5 E. Bull cost per year (A - C) / D $/yr. 81.33 F. Bull feed cost per day $/d 2.50 G. Bull feed cost per year (F x 365) $/yr. 912.50

H.Bull labor, veterinary, bedding, and facility costs per year $/yr. 50 I. Net Merit $ of bull (NM$ of sire + NM$ of dam) / 2 $ 40 J. Number of cows and heifers settling to bull per year cows/yr. 50 K. Number of heifers born sired to bull (J / 2) heifers/yr. 25 L. No. of lactations expected per cow lactations 3 M. Total bull costs per heifer (E + G + H) / K $ 41.75 N. Net Merit $ of AI bulls used $ 87 O. Semen cost per unit $ 12

P. Number of units per conception units 3 Q. Number of units per heifer (P x 2) units 6 R. Semen cost per heifer (O x Q) $/heifer 72 S. Expected advantage for bull daughters over AI daughters (I - N) x L $ -141 T. Expected cost advantage for bull daughters over AI daughters ((R + $5.00) - M $ 35.25 U. Net advantage for Bull over AI (S + T) $ -105.75 V. If U is negative, then the maximum number of additional days open that is justified for using AI is (-U / 3.5) d 30.2

Dry Cow Management Dry off Maintaining idle cow Loss of 1000-2000 lbs. if dry period < 30 days Days dry less variable with AI, even with routine preg checks Transition rations Additional feed costs and metabolic disorders Choice List of cows to preg check

Calving Difficulty Heritability of calving ease 15% Genetics & Management Important breed on size, not age Calving Ease important for heifers AI often is first eliminated for heifers NAAB reports %DBH Use AI bulls with <9% DBH

Safety Family, employees, veterinarians, other dairy professionals Who has been chased up a tree by a straw of semen or brutalized by an AI technician? Sturdy and secure pen Safety training for all employees Way to separate the bull from workers Have second employee nearby Plenty of escape routes Know the signs of aggression

Other Considerations Infertility Low libido Venereal Diseases Vibriosis Trichomoniasis Brucellosis, Leptospirosis

So you still decided to buy a herd bull? $

Management of Herd Bulls Select bulls wisely Use Pedigree Index for NM$ Choose bulls in 70th percentile for AI (>155) Sires of purchased bulls should be in 90th percentile (>180) Average semen price of top 25 Holstein AI sires is < $25

Management of Herd Bulls Use several young bulls Breeding soundness exam Safe facilities and training Bull Comfort Routine pregnancy checking

Summary Foregone genetic improvement Dry cow management Risk of dystocia Transmission of reproductive diseases Risk of infertile bulls Human Safety