Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Implementation. Craig Carson Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection

Similar documents
PROTECTING OUR WATERWAYS: STORMWATER POLLUTION REDUCTION EFFORTS

PA Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) TMDL Plan

Pennsylvania s Phase III Watershed Implementation Plan

WATER QUALITY IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Development of a Stormwater Management Plan for Phase II Small MS4s Insight and Innovation

Innovative Storm Water Program Implementation

CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL ACTION PLAN ( MS4 General Permit)

Andrea Ludwig, PhD, EIT Assistant Professor Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science University of Tennessee

The Next Generation of Stormwater Management and Site Design. Melanie R. Grigsby, P.E. Stormwater Resource Manager, City of Fort Myers

Montgomery County s MS4 Permit Implementation Strategy: Using the Watershed Treatment to meet local and Bay restoration goals

Promoting Sustainable Cities

City of Fairmont Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) January 23, 2017

MS4 Programs: Quality, the Other Stormwater Q. Dan Bounds, PE, D.WRE IAFSM March 9, 2017

CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL ACTION PLAN ( MS4 General Permit)

Council of Governments

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore MD

What is a stormwater utility fee?

Stormwater Programs. BIA Meeting June 5, Jason Uhley

City of Vancouver March 2017 DRAFT

Rainfall, runoff and sediment transport in the Napa River watershed: now and a possible future

MARCH 2013 TO MARCH 2014 (YEAR 11) REPORTING PERIOD VILLAGE OF SKOKIE, ILLINOIS

ATTACHMENT N ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS

Clean water. From nature.

Richard V. Busche, P.E., CFM

Appendix F Storm Drain Cleaning Program

Pollution Reduction Plan For Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. Table of Contents

A Case for the Design and Modeling of BMP Infiltration and LID Techniques. By: Bob Murdock

Go Green, Save Money: Lowering Flood Insurance Rates in Virginia with Stormwater Management. Kristen Clark VCPC Alumna, Spring 2014

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore MD

City of Salem Stormwater Utility Answers to Frequently Asked Questions

Cost-Effectiveness Study of Urban Stormwater BMPs in the James River Basin

Green Infrastructure Financing

MS4 Permits. Understanding MS4 Permits (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System) P508-17

Virginia Department of Transportation Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

EROSION, SEDIMENTATION, ETC

Maryland Department of the Environment. 12-SW Permit Update for Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity

Checklist for 2013 Draft NH Small MS4 General Permit Requirements

Action Plan for the James River (Tidal) Bacteria TMDL ( MS4 General Permit)

The total population of the township is 9,942 (2015 Five-Year American Community Survey [ACS]). The median household income is over $109,000.

Municipal Stormwater Management Planning

PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT PLAN Storm Water Management Plan

Arlington s New Stormwater Management Ordinance. Informational Meeting May 28, 2014

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) & Pollutant Reduction Plan (PRP) For Skippack Creek Franconia Township Montgomery County, Pennsylvania

Watershed master planning, City of Griffin, Georgia, USA

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. Pottawatomie County, Kansas Stormwater Management Program

Wakefield Lake TMDL Public Meeting 3/17/2014. Jen Koehler, PE Barr Engineering

J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College. Chesapeake Bay TMDL Action Plan

City: Stormwaterville Zip Code: County: Addison. City: Stormwaterville Zip Code: County: Addison

Kitchener s Stormwater Utility

Sustainability Report

NPDES Phase II Permit

Quantifying the Benefits of Stream Restoration

Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Program Plan

GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER BACTERIA REDUCTIONS THROUGH BMP IMPLEMENTATION NY/NJ HARBOR TMDL DEVELOPMENT

FieldDoc.org User Guide For 2017 NFWF Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Applicants. Background 2. Step 1: Register for a FieldDoc account 3

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND 2017 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (SWMP) PLAN

What Does It All Mean? CWA? Sara Esposito, P.E. DNREC Division of Watershed Stewardship

Review of State and Federal Stormwater Regulations November 2007

Emerging Trends in Ecological Offsets

Stormwater Management Program Plan (SWMPP) NPDES Permit ALR Revised May 31, Prepared By:

Environmental Management at DoD Facilities in the Chesapeake Bay Region. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION GENERIC PERMIT FOR DISCHARGE OF STORMWATER FROM PHASE II

Monitoring Stormwater Best Management Practices: Why Is It Important and What To Monitor

BCWMC Capital Improvement Program (approved April 19, 2018; pending minor Plan amendment)

VILLAGE OF BELLAIRE WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Annual Facility Inspection Report for General Permit for Discharges from Small MS4s

WATERSHED AUDITS Auditing Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) This Presentation Posted At ceds.org/audit

Restoring the Anacostia River

Storm Water & Drainage Projects 2011 Program Update

Wisconsin Wastewater Operators Association. Protecting Our Water Resources: The Future Bill Hafs - NEW Water 10/2014

POLICY FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREAS

Polluted Runoff and Land Conservation: What s the Connection?

SURFACE WATER UTILITY FEE

Appendix J. Existing Efforts for Identifying Multi-Benefit Projects

City of Lenexa. Stormwater Management Plan

LOS ANGELES WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS October 28, 2015 JOLENE GUERRERO LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

Paraprofessional Training Session 1

STREAM RESTORATION PURPOSE, PRACTICE, AND METHODS. By Marcus Rubenstein, CPESC

Boosting Residential Adoption of Stormwater Practices. March 22, Steve Raabe President, OpinionWorks, LLC

Suffolk Downs Redevelopment. Appendix G: Stormwater Management Supporting Documentation

2017 Update Stormwater Management Program (SWMP)

SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT ELEMENT

OVERVIEW OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY

The Clean Water Act: Phase I

Integrating Green Infrastructure and Floodplain Restoration. June 21, 2016

UMD Storm Water Program Construction Requirements. Greg Archer, MBA Environmental Compliance Specialist

Chesapeake Bay Action Plan

ENHANCING AND PROTECTING WATER QUALITY, QUANTITY, AND SUPPLY

Chapter 1. Introduction

6. Pollutant Sources in

Hydrology 101. Impacts of the Urban Environment. Nokomis Knolls Pond Summer June 2008

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Permit

Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM) Software Introduction. Doug Beyerlein, P.E., P.H., D.WRE Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Mill Creek, Washington

Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Awareness Presentation. March 8 th, :00AM 12:00PM Video Conference

COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA

Newport Bay Watershed Executive Committee

The Green Edge: How Commercial Property Investment in Green Infrastructure Creates Value. Larry Levine, NRDC Jan. 28, 2014

APPENDIX H Guidance for Preparing/Reviewing CEQA Initial Studies and Environmental Impact Reports

Transcription:

Montgomery County Maryland Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Implementation Craig Carson Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection

Montgomery County, Maryland 500 sq. miles 970,000 people 184 languages spoken NPDES Phase I Jurisdiction About 12% impervious surface overall About the size of Washington DC Over 1,500 miles of streams Two major river basins: Potomac Patuxent Eight primary basins 2

Montgomery County s Watershed Restoration Program Program began in 1991 Focusing on: Watershed studies Stream restoration Wetland creation Stormwater management projects 3

Montgomery County s Countywide Stream Protection Strategy (1995 and updated 2003)

Evaluates biological resource/stream habitat conditions Rates stream conditions as excellent, good, fair, poor Priority watersheds targeted for proactive CIP projects to undo stream damage 5

Countywide Stream Monitoring Biological Conditions 2006-2010 6

Montgomery County Would Significantly Advance Bay Cleanup Efforts Among the Strongest in the Country, New Stormwater Permit Would Restore an Additional 20 Percent of Impervious Surfaces, Require Plans for a Trash-free Potomac River, and Restore Federally Listed Impaired Waterways Montgomery County issued MS4 Permit 2010 Source: MDE Press 7

Montgomery County s Major MS4 Permit Requirements Implementation Strategy: Develop plan within one year that meets Permit requirements (projects, funding, water quality) Watershed Restoration: Retrofit 20% of impervious surfaces not currently controlled to the maximum extent practicable (MEP) Water Quality: Make Progress toward meeting permit wasteload allocations (nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment, bacteria, trash TMDLs) Trash Reduction: Implement initiatives to meet commitments in Trash Free Potomac Treaty goals Anacostia Trash TMDL (2 nd trash TMDL in the U.S.) Public Outreach: Engage public through outreach and stewardship opportunities Report and Monitor: Submit annual report on progress

MS4 Permit Requirements: Focusing on Restoration Mitigating previous sins by improving water quality From 1995 through 2010, added runoff management for approximately 2,200 impervious acres or equivalents 2010-2015, requires additional stormwater management for 20 percent of impervious surfaces (4,300 acres = 6.7 square miles) That s equivalent to 32,912 football fields! 9

Countywide Coordinated Implementation Strategy Description Area in Acres Total 324,552 Total Area of Impervious Surface 35,965 Eight Watershed Plans County Subject to Stormwater Permit (1) 138,649 Strategy to meet MS4 permit requirements Impervious Cover Subject to Stormwater Permit 25,119 Final report - January 2012 Adequately Treated Impervious Cover 3,661 Inadequately Treated Impervious Cover 21,458 20% of Inadequately Treated Impervious Cover 4,292 10

Countywide Strategy: Impervious Acres Treated and Pollutant Reductions Submitted to MDE in February 2011 for MS4 Permit annual reporting requirement Based on State of Maryland 2010 targets to meet 70% implementation by 2017 and 100% implementation by 2020 Subsequently, targets modified to 60% by 2017 and 100% by 2025 11

Capital Improvement FY09-14 $31 Million FY11-16 $106 Million FY13-18 $295 Million Budget Starting in FY11 CIP funding through Water Quality Protection Charge Revenue Bonds

Watershed Restoration Strategy 13

Watershed Restoration Stormwater Management Pond Retrofits Stream Restoration Green Streets Low Impact Development at Public Buildings Rainscapes Strategy 14

Stormwater Management Pond Retrofits Treated = 34.8 impervious acres Total Project Costs = $425,665 Completed - 2008 Peppertree Stormwater Management Pond in Aspen Hill, Maryland 15

Stormdrain Outfall Wetlands Treated = 6.3 impervious acres Total Project Costs = $102,630 Completed - 1999 Godwin Marsh in Silver Spring, Maryland 16

New Stormwater Management Ponds Stoney Creek Stormwater Management Pond National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland Treated = 105 impervious acres Total Project Costs = $3.5 Million Completed - 2013 17

Stream Restoration After Before Length = 3,748 Feet Total Project Costs = $493,072 Completed - 2003 Northwood Stream Restoration Project in Silver Spring, Maryland

Stream Restoration Length = 3 miles Total Project Costs = $2,074,444 Completed - 2008 Turkey Branch Stream Restoration Project in Aspen Hill, Maryland 19

Stream Restoration Length = 0.8 Miles Total Project Costs = $2.5 Million Completed - 2013 Booze Creek Stream Restoration Project in Bethesda, Maryland 20

Stream Restoration Before Length = 1,901 Feet Total Project Costs = $647,449 Completed - 2012 After Batchellor s Run East Stream Restoration Project in Layhill, Maryland

Treated = 2.4 impervious acres Total Project Costs = $640,065 Completed - 2011 Green Street Arcola Avenue

Treated = 5.06 impervious acres Total Project Costs = $515,517 Completed - 2012 www6.montgomerycountymd.gov/content/dep/downloads/restoration/greenstreets_forestestates.pdf

Green Streets Dennis Avenue Forest Estates Treated = 20 impervious acres Total project costs = $4,843,410 Under construction (three phases) 24

Green Streets Franklin Knolls 25

Green Streets Sligo Park Hills Neighborhood Currently in Design 26

School Low Impact Development Projects Ridgeview Middle School Treated = 1.96 impervious acres Total Project Costs = $285,283 Completed - 2012 27

Government Facilities Low Impact Development Kensington Library Treated = 0.74 impervious acres Total Project Costs = $355,000 Completed - 2012 28

RainScapes Implementation RainScapes Neighborhoods Contractor-installed projects Measurable goal and monitoring Paired with other departmental efforts RainScapes Rewards Rebates Rain Gardens Conservation Landscaping Urban Tree Canopy Permeable Pavers Pavement Removal Green Roofs Water Harvesting o Cisterns o Rain Barrels Dry Wells Training RainScapes for Schools RainScapes for Landscape Professionals RainScapes Partnerships with Watershed Groups Resources for Residents 29

Residential Priority Neighborhoods Lot Size Status of SWM Percent of homes owned HOA or community group 30

Check out our website for more info on techniques 31

Restoration Requires SWM BMP Inspection and Maintenance Over 7,000 BMPs currently Significant increase in number of small practices to meet ESD/LID requirements Inspect all stormwater BMPs once every three years Evaluating inspection requirements for ESD/LID Significant outreach challenge Increase property-owner awareness Increase property-owner stewardship 32

Restoration Requires Maintenance of Stormwater BMPs County performs maintenance on LID practices built in Rights of Way Green streets practices require monthly maintenance Maintenance by contractor Inspection and monitoring by County staff Before Maintenance After Maintenance 33

34

Breewood Tributary Upper Sligo Creek Measuring Success: Small Watershed Restoration Breewood Tributary of Upper Sligo Creek Community Description Approximately 60 acres 33% imperviousness Diverse Community Retrofits Local High School Green Streets Stormwater Retrofits RainScapes Neighborhood Parking lot and tree box retrofits Stormwater Wetland Retrofit Stream Restoration Environmental Outreach and Litter Reduction Local Park Improvement Weed Warriors Biology, flow, and water quality monitoring No HOAs Presbyterian Church Mixed Use Single Family Homes and High Rise Apartments Contractor demonstrating sampling equipment during cleanup event 35

Sligo Creek Stream Restoration Reduces Peak Storm Flow and Improves Aquatic Life in Creek http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/nps/success319/md_sligo.cfm 36

37

MS4 Project Implementation Costs Table III-G8. FY10- FY12 Capital Improvement Program Costs for Watershed Assessment and Restoration Fiscal Year (FY) FY10 FY11 FY12 Total annual cost for watershed assessment $ 433,800 $ 749,130 $ 502,244 Total annual cost for watershed restoration $2,942,100 $3,904,222 $8,168,571 Total Costs $3,375,900 $4,653,352 $8,670,815 Table III-G10. Department of Environmental Protection Approved (May 2012) FY13-18 Stormwater Management (SWM) Capital Improvement Program Budget (in $000s) Projects CIP Cycle Total FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 SWM Retrofit 127,010 11,710 19,700 20,600 20,000 25,000 30,000 SWM Retro-Government Facilities. Low Impact Development 11,425 1,125 1,900 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 SWM Retrofit- Roads 49,425 6,015 7,410 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 SWM Retrofit Schools 20,100 1,270 1,010 3270 4,850 4850 4,850 Miscellaneous Stream Valley Improvement 9,870 2,070 2,070 2,070 1,220 1,220 1,220 SWM Facility Planning 6,750 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,100 1,100 1,100 SWM Retrofit Anacostia 1,620 310 310 310 230 230 230 Major Structural Repair 8,800 1,350 1,450 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Total 235,000 25,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 38

Public Outreach and Stewardship Workplan Eight priorities to increase awareness and engagement Continue RainScapes Program and increase voluntary implementation Develop and implement Anti-Littering Campaign Establish the Stream Stewards program 39

8 Priorities for Behavior Change *Vital roles for watershed and community groups Prevention is the most cost-effective reduction approach: Trash and litter Advertising campaign*, increased enforcement, and public and private property staff training Bacteria and nutrients from urban sources Picking up pet waste outreach*, installing pet waste stations, and creating incentive program for installations 40

41

Goal: Streams in Good Condition Sculpin Stonefly 42