VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT

Similar documents
CITY OF LOS ANGELES SAN PEDRO COMMUNITY PLAN

Table of Contents. City of Redlands - Redlands Crossing Center

County of El Dorado. El Dorado Hills Apartments Project Draft Environmental Impact Report. SCH No Prepared For: Prepared by:

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Volume 1. NBC Universal Evolution Plan ENV EIR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO Council District 4

CHAPTER 11 Climate Change Considerations

SECTION F UPDATED PERMIT REQUIREMENTS

CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Report SCH#

3.0 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Environmental Setting, Impacts, Standard Conditions of Approval, and Mitigation Measures

ADOPTION OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

Venice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR 1.0 I NTRODUCTION

Draft Environmental Assessment Terminal B/C Redevelopment, Secure National Hall, and Related Improvements

Environmental Information Worksheet

CEQA and Health Effects

Hollister Urban Area Water and Wastewater Master Plan and Coordinated Water Supply and Treatment Plan

Citizen s Guide: A Handbook to the Draft Environmental Impact Report and Review Process

South of Woodward Avenue Project

Encina Wastewater Authority Board of Directors June 25, 2014

SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INVASIVE SPARTINA PROJECT: SPARTINA CONTROL PROGRAM

Neighborhood Advisory Committee. EIR Process Overview. Chapman University April 20, 2016

DRAFT Environmental Impact Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS...

Rainy Season Preparation & Storm Channel Maintenance

32. Relationship Between Short-term Uses and Long-term Productivity

4.4 Agricultural Resources

DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Planning and Building Safety Department

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. CHAPTER ONE: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY with RESPONSES TO COMMENTS

Environmental Checklist Form

CEQA and its Role in Historic Preservation. Darcy Kremin, AICP Bay Area Environmental Practice Leader Michael Baker International, Oakland, CA

Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project Environmental Impact Report Public Information Meetings

Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 EIR REQUIREMENT

2.1 Project Definition/Classification/Initial Study Project Definition

ANDORA AVENUE TTM PROJECT Subsequent Draft EIR

2035 General Plan Update, Belmont Village Specific Plan, and Climate Action Plan

APPENDIX H Guidance for Preparing/Reviewing CEQA Initial Studies and Environmental Impact Reports

Executive Summary. ES.1 Project Background

STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY

Introduction. They can help ensure that all key issues and elements have been considered; They help ensure that the review process is systematic; and

Northwest State Route 138 Corridor Improvement Project

The following sections from the CEQA Guidelines define the role and purpose of an EIR:

3.0 Relationship to Other Conservation Plans

APPENDIX 5.12-A PROJECT NOISE ANALYSIS: ARTESIAN SUBSTATION

4.10 LAND USE/RECREATION 4.10 LAND USE/RECREATION

CEQA BASICS. The California Environmental Quality Act. Prepared for: Orange County Department of Education. Prepared by:

Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and Scoping Meeting

CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER WEST TOWER PROJECT ENV EIR APPENDIX A NOTICE OF PREPARATION INITIAL STUDY PUBLIC SCOPING COMMENTS

Campus Photovoltaic Energy Project at California State University Channel Islands

County of El Dorado Notice of Preparation Tilden Park Project

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 BACKGROUND ES.2 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

Appendix H Traffic Study

4.13 POPULATION, EMPLOYMENT, AND HOUSING; GROWTH INDUCEMENT; AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE

You Can t Build Without CEQA!

5.0 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES

Commercial Medical Cannabis Ordinance

Appendix A: Notices of Preparation

City of White Plains Westchester County, NY. Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

Bell Middle School Modernization Project

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA

RENAISSANCE EAST ADDENDUM TO THE RENAISSANCE SPECIFIC PLAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VOLUME 1 OF 2 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE #

CHAPTER 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION

Commerce Park. Draft Environmental Impact Report. CITY OF FONTANA Citrus Commerce Park SCH SEPTEMBER 2014 VOLUME 1. Project Applicant:

3 REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT EIR

Description of Proposed Project

Purpose of the EIR. Chapter 1 Introduction

COMPARISON OF PROJECT AGAINST EXISTING CONDITIONS

CHAPTER 7. San Dieguito River Flooding Adaptation

Appendix H References

The newly updated and comprehensive SWMP shall:

Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration. Sunset Hills Development. General Plan Amendment # , Zone Change # ,

COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES

HELENA CHEMICAL COMPANY NELSON TERMINAL PROJECT USE PERMIT UP Butte County Board of Supervisors January 29, 2013

SMUD Franklin Electric Transmission Project. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Addendum July 2017

El Dorado Water & Power Authority. El Dorado Water Reliability Project

4.3 AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES

This comparison is designed to satisfy the requirements of State CEQA Guidelines, Section (d), Evaluation of Alternatives, which state that:

District Policy. Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for Stationary Source Projects Under CEQA When Serving as the Lead Agency

II. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Medical Marijuana Ordinance

NOTICE OF PREPARATION DUBLIN HIGH SCHOOL ENGINEERING & SCIENCE BUILDING AND INTERIM HOUSING PHASE 1B ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

1. Introduction

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF PREPARATION

NOTICE OF PREPARATION & PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING NOTICE

Wastewater ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING. Wastewater Collection

3.0 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS SCENARIO

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

Existing Conditions

LAFCO ANNEXATION TO JURUPA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TTM RIVERBEND)

5365 Cherry Avenue Opportunities for Learning Charter School

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT INITIAL STUDY (Article I - City CEQA Guidelines)

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR LA SIERRA METROLINK PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROJECT

STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT

APPENDIX A: A.1: Santa Monica Community College District Notice of Preparation and Scoping Meeting for the Santa Monica College Malibu Campus Project

Clifton Marsh Landfill Variation of planning permission 05/09/0376 & 06/09/0395 for the continuation of landfilling until Non Technical Summary

CHAPTER 8.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS

Council Agenda Report

POND SITING REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION SECTION 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan

Transcription:

VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT WATER, WASTEWATER, AND RECYCLED WATER MASTER PLAN Draft Program Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 2010071073

VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT 2008 Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Master Plan Draft Program Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 2010071073 Prepared for Vallecitos Water District 201 Vallecitos de Oro San Marcos, CA 92069 Prepared by PBS&J 9275 Sky Park Court, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92123 PBS&J#100002824

CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... ES-1 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION... 1-1 1.1 Master Plan Background... 1-1 1.2 Environmental Review Process... 1-2 1.3 Organization of the PEIR... 1-6 1.4 Other Related Environmental Documents... 1-7 Chapter 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING... 2-1 2.1 Regional Setting... 2-1 2.2 Local Setting... 2-1 2.3 Potential Annexations... 2-3 Chapter 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION... 3-1 3.1 VWD Service Area... 3-1 3.2 Background... 3-2 3.3 VWD Master Plan... 3-3 Chapter 4 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ANALYSIS... 4.0-1 4.1 Air Quality... 4.1-1 4.1.1 Environmental Setting... 4.1-1 4.1.2 Regulatory Framework... 4.1-6 4.1.3 Master Plan Impacts and Mitigation... 4.1-9 4.1.4 Cumulative Impacts...4.1-18 4.1.5 CEQA Checklist Items Deemed Not Significant or Not Applicable to the 2008 Master Plan...4.1-20 4.1.6 References...4.1-21 4.2 Biological Resources... 4.2-1 4.2.1 Environmental Setting... 4.2-1 4.2.2 Regulatory Framework...4.2-14 4.2.3 Master Plan Impacts and Mitigation...4.2-25 4.2.4 Cumulative Impacts...4.2-69 4.2.5 CEQA Checklist Items Deemed Not Significant or Not Applicable to the 2008 VWD Master Plan...4.2-71 4.2.6 References...4.2-72 4.3 Cultural Resources... 4.3-1 4.3.1 Environmental Setting... 4.3-1 4.3.2 Regulatory Framework... 4.3-4 4.3.3 Master Plan Impacts and Mitigation... 4.3-7 4.3.4 Cumulative Impacts...4.3-14 Page i

4.3.5 CEQA Checklist Items Deemed Not Significant or Not Applicable to the 2008 Master Plan...4.3-15 4.3.6 References...4.3-15 4.4 Energy... 4.4-1 4.4.1 Environmental Setting... 4.4-1 4.4.2 Regulatory Framework... 4.4-1 4.4.3 Master Plan Impacts and Mitigation... 4.4-3 4.4.4 Cumulative Impacts... 4.4-6 4.4.5 CEQA Checklist Items Deemed Not Significant or Not Applicable to the 2008 Master Plan... 4.4-7 4.4.6 References... 4.4-7 4.5 Geology, Soils, and Paleontology... 4.5-1 4.5.1 Environmental Setting... 4.5-1 4.5.2 Regulatory Framework... 4.5-6 4.5.3 Master Plan Impacts and Mitigation... 4.5-9 4.5.4 Cumulative Impacts...4.5-17 4.5.5 CEQA Checklist Items Deemed Not Significant or Not Applicable to the 2008 Master Plan...4.5-18 4.5.6 References...4.5-19 4.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions... 4.6-1 4.6.1 Environmental Setting... 4.6-1 4.6.2 Regulatory Framework... 4.6-6 4.6.3 Master Plan Impacts and Mitigation... 4.6-9 4.6.4 Cumulative Impacts...4.6-17 4.6.5 CEQA Checklist Items Deemed Not Significant or Not Applicable to the 2008 Master Plan...4.6-17 4.6.6 References...4.6-17 4.7 Hydrology and Water Quality... 4.7-1 4.7.1 Environmental Setting... 4.7-1 4.7.2 Regulatory Framework... 4.7-7 4.7.3 Master Plan Impacts and Mitigation...4.7-10 4.7.4 Cumulative Impacts...4.7-19 4.7.5 CEQA Checklist Items Deemed Not Significant or Not Applicable to the 2008 Master Plan...4.7-21 4.7.6 References...4.7-21 4.8 Landform Alteration and Aesthetics... 4.8-1 4.8.1 Environmental Setting... 4.8-1 4.8.2 Regulatory Framework... 4.8-3 4.8.3 Master Plan Impacts and Mitigation... 4.8-6 4.8.4 Cumulative Impacts...4.8-14 4.8.5 CEQA Checklist Items Deemed Not Significant or Not Applicable to the 2008 Master Plan...4.8-16 4.8.6 References...4.8-16 Page ii

4.9 Land Use and Planning... 4.9-1 4.9.1 Environmental Setting... 4.9-1 4.9.2 Regulatory Framework... 4.9-5 4.9.3 Master Plan Impacts and Mitigation...4.9-10 4.9.4 Cumulative Impacts...4.9-14 4.9.5 CEQA Checklist Items Deemed Not Significant or Not Applicable to the 2008 Master Plan...4.9-14 4.9.6 References...4.9-15 4.10 Noise...4.10-1 4.10.1 Environmental Setting...4.10-1 4.10.2 Regulatory Framework...4.10-4 4.10.3 Master Plan Impacts and Mitigation...4.10-10 4.10.4 Cumulative Impacts...4.10-16 4.10.5 CEQA Checklist Items Deemed Not Significant or Not Applicable to the 2008 Master Plan...4.10-18 4.10.6 References...4.10-18 4.11 Public Safety...4.11-1 4.11.1 Environmental Setting...4.11-1 4.11.2 Regulatory Framework...4.11-3 4.11.3 Master Plan Impacts and Mitigation...4.11-5 4.11.4 Cumulative Impacts...4.11-11 4.11.5 CEQA Checklist Items Deemed Not Significant or Not Applicable to the 2008 Master Plan...4.11-12 4.11.6 References...4.11-13 Chapter 5 OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS... 5-1 5.1 Effects Found Not Significant... 5-1 5.2 CEQA Checklist Items Deemed Not Significant or Not Applicable to the 2008 Master Plan... 5-4 5.3 Growth Inducement... 5-6 5.4 Significant and Unavoidable Environmental Impacts... 5-8 5.5 Significant and Irreversible Environmental Effects... 5-9 5.6 References... 5-10 Chapter 6 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES... 6-1 6.1 Master Plan Objectives... 6-1 6.2 Alternatives Analyzed... 6-2 Chapter 7 LIST OF PREPARERS... 7-1 Page iii

TECHNICAL APPENDICES Appendix A. Notice of Preparation and Comment Letters Received on the NOP/Environmental Initial Study Appendix B. Biological Resources Tables Appendix C. Cultural Resources Letter Report 1 Appendix D. Appendix E. Paleontological Resources Report Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data Sheets FIGURES Figure 3-1 VWD Service Area... 3-29 Figure 3-2 CIP Locations... 3-30 Figure 4.2-1 Potential Sensitive Natural Communities within the Parallel Land Outfall...4.2-77 Figure 4.2-2 USFWS Critical Habitat...4.2-78 Figure 4.2-3 Coastal Zone...4.2-79 Figure 4.2-4 MHCP and MSCP Conservation Areas...4.2-80 Figure 4.2-5 USFWS National Wetlands Inventory...4.2-81 Figure 4.3-1 Archaeological Resources Sensitivity Map...4.3-17 Figure 4.5-1 Fault Location Map...4.5-21 Figure 4.5-2 Geohazardsq...4.5-22 Figure 4.5-3 Steep Slopes...4.5-23 Figure 4.5-4 Geological Formations...4.5-24 Figure 4.7-1 Hydrologic Units within VWD Service Area...4.7-23 Figure 4.7-2 FEMA Floodplains/Floodways...4.7-24 Figure 4.8-1 Representative Views of VWD Reservoirs...4.8-19 Figure 4.8-2 Representative Views of VWD Lift and Pump Stations...4.8-20 Figure 4.8-3 Resource Conservation Areas...4.8-21 TABLES Table ES-1 Table ES-2 Master Plan Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures... ES-5 Cumulative Impacts and Mitigation Measures... ES-29 Table 3-1 2008 VWD Master Plan Phasing... 3-5 Table 3-2 2008 Master Plan Potable Water Storage Projects... 3-6 Table 3-3 Potable Water Pump Station Projects... 3-8 Table 3-4 Potable Water Pipeline Projects... 3-10 Table 3-5 Wastewater Lift Station Projects... 3-12 Table 3-6 Sewer Pipeline Projects... 3-14 Table 3-7 Federal, State, or Local Permits and Approvals... 3-27 1 The cultural resources record search prepared for this PEIR contains sensitive information regarding the location and nature of cultural resources and, pursuant to federal law, is not made available to the general public. Qualified individuals may view the report by appointment at the VWD office. Page iv

Table 4.0-1 Geographic Scope of Cumulative Impact Analyses... 4.0-6 Table 4.0-2 Anticipated Increase in Population (2008-2030)... 4.0-8 Table 4.0-3 Anticipated Increase in Jobs (2008-2030)... 4.0-8 Table 4.0-4 Anticipated Increase in Housing Units (2008-2030)... 4.0-8 Table 4.0-5 Past, Present and Probable Projects Having Cumulative Impacts... 4.0-9 Table 4.0-6 2030 San Diego Regional Transportation Plan Projects...4.0-11 Table 4.1-1 Air Quality Monitoring Data... 4.1-4 Table 4.1-2 State and National Ambient Air Quality Standards... 4.1-5 Table 4.1-3 San Diego Air Basin Attainment Status... 4.1-7 Table 4.1-4 San Diego Air Pollution Control District Pollutant Thresholds...4.1-12 Table 4.1-5 Worst-Case Daily Emissions Associated with Construction...4.1-14 Table 4.1-6 Worse-Case Daily Maximum Emissions Associated with Diesel Emergency Back-up Generators...4.1-15 Table 4.1-7 Estimated Daily Vehicular Emissions...4.1-16 Table 4.1-8 Estimated Total Worst-Case Daily Emissions...4.1-16 Table 4.2-1 USFWS Critical Habitat within the VWD Service Area...4.2-11 Table 4.2-2 Major Wetland Resources within the Service Area...4.2-14 Table 4.3-1 Cultural Resources that may be Affected by CIP Project Construction...4.3-10 Table 4.4-1 Average Monthly Electricity Consumption of Existing VWD Pump and Lift Stations... 4.4-2 Table 4.4-2 Estimated Average Monthly Electricity Consumption for CIP Pump and Lift Stations... 4.4-6 Table 4.5-1 Active Faults within 60 miles of the VWD Service Area... 4.5-2 Table 4.6-1 Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes of Basic GHGs... 4.6-2 Table 4.6-2 Average Annual VWD GHG Emissions (2007)... 4.6-5 Table 4.6-3 Estimated GHG Emissions for CIP Project Construction...4.6-11 Table 4.6-4 Estimated Annual Net Increase in VWD GHG Emissions for Proposed CIP Pump and Lift Stations...4.6-13 Table 4.6-5 GHG Emission Reductions Estimates for Master Plan CIP Project-Incorporated Measures...4.6-15 Table 4.6-6 Estimated GHG Emission Reductions with Project Features...4.6-15 Table 4.7-1 Water Bodies Indentified as Impaired under the Clean Water Act... 4.7-4 Table 4.7-2 Tsunami Heights in San Diego... 4.7-7 Table 4.9-1 Summary of Community Policy Consistency and Land Use Compatibility...4.9-12 Table 4.10-1 County of San Diego Noise Ordinance Exterior Noise Standards...4.10-6 Table 4.10-2 City of San Marcos Noise Ordinance Limits Exterior Noise Standards...4.10-7 Table 4.10-3 City of Escondido Exterior Noise Standards...4.10-8 Table 4.10-4 City of Vista Exterior Property Line Noise Limits...4.10-9 Table 4.11-1 Schools Located Within the Vicinity of a 2008 Master Plan CIP project...4.11-10 Table 6-1 Summary of Analysis for Alternatives to the 2008 Master Plan... 6-2 Table 6-2 Ability of Alternatives to Meet Proposed Master Plan Objectives... 6-4 Page v

This page intentionally left blank. Page vi