Port of Long Beach Port Master Plan Overview December 22, 2008

Similar documents
3.8 LAND USE Introduction Environmental Setting

3.8 LAND USE Introduction Environmental Setting Regional Setting PMPU Area

Waterfront Land Use. Michigan Coastal Community Working Waterfronts. Table of Contents. Case Studies

ORDER NO. An Order of the Board of Harbor Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles amending the Port of Los Angeles Tariff No. 4.

Partnerships in Capital Projects. AAPA Facilities Engineering Seminar and Expo

Waterways 1 Water Transportation History

CHAPTER 14. ROADWAYS AND MARINE TRANSPORTATION

Alexandria port Eldekhiela port

Kristin Decas Port of Hueneme Executive Director

Project Overview. Northwest Innovation Works LLC and the Port of Kalama propose to develop and operate

Alaska Deep-Draft Arctic Ports Navigation Feasibility Study. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bruce Sexauer P.E. Chief of Planning, Alaska District

Port of Los Angeles Presentation to the Los Angeles Investors Conference March 19, 2018

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Ports of Long Beach and Los Angele Summary of Key Water and Sediment Quality Programs & Projects. Common and/or Joint POLB/POLA Programs & Projects

Boat Launch Analysis. 5.1 Introduction Boat Launch Study Overview Boat Launch Site Alternatives. Chapter 5

Port Performance Statistics Fixing America's Surface Transportation ("FAST ) Act was signed into law on December 4, 2015.

5.5 NAVIGABLE WATERWAYS AND COASTAL ZONE

SAINT JOHN PORT AUTHORITY TARIFF NOTICES. Effective: January 1, 2018

Port of New Bedford. AAPA Commissioners Seminar May 17, 2011 Prosperity through Economic Development Opportunities

Beneficial Reuse of Dredged Sediments in the Middle Harbor Slip 1 Fill

SMALL HARBOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PROGRAM (SHIPP) - MUNICIPAL

A. THE PORT OF SEATTLE

Mississippi Development Authority. Amendment 5. Port of Gulfport Restoration Program

PROJECT SUMMARY NOP AVAILABILTY AGENCY & PUBLIC COMMENTS

Paying For Port Security. HAL HUDGINS Vice President, Planning and Security Alabama State Port Authority

HAMILTON Y COMPAÑÍA A BRANCH OF:

Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center

Port NOLA Forward: Strategic Master Plan FAQs

THE LOCAL AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE US DEEPWATER PORT SYSTEM, 2007 PREPARED FOR: AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PORT AUTHORITIES JUNE 6, 2008

Detachment Chief United States Coast Guard Liquefied Gas Carrier National Center of Expertise

Centered on global trade.

COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES

Inland Port Cargo Complex

Appendix D. San Francisco Bay Plan Consistency Analysis

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 3E

Port Authority of Guam

PORT OF LOS ANGELES CHANNEL DEEPENING PROJECT 1. Introduction

Rail Service at Brookley Aeroplex

PORT INFORMATION GUIDE NOTICE OF AMENDMENT

RESOLUTION NO

HARBORCO General Information

Article 7. COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

Section 27 Schedule of Uses by District

Conversion table working groups Name working group Old number New number Conception des barrages mobiles et de barriers anti-tempêtes PIANC WG 101

Memorandum. California public trust law governs the administration of tidelands and submerged lands in several ways:

Regulations of the People s Republic of China on the Emergency. Prevention and Handling of Marine Pollution Caused by Ships

Competing Uses of Port Property

St. Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District

Venice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR 1.0 I NTRODUCTION

Safety and Environment Management Plan

Berths [Everport] Container Terminal Improvements Project Draft EIS/EIR Public Meeting

Southeast Florida Freight and Goods Movement Update Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council September 16, 2011

Growth In Container Volumes

XI. Thornton Planning Area

Florida Clean Vessel Act Program

EPA Issues General Permit for Vessels

Section 2 Environmental Considerations for Port Development and Operations

Eric Thomas Benchmark River and Rail Terminals

Introduction: Jason Giffen, Assistant Vice President, Planning and Green Port

3.6 VESSEL TRANSPORTATION Environmental Setting Area of Influence Setting

PORT OF KASKINEN SEIZE THE OPPORTUNITY

40 YEARS OF MARINE OPERATIONS & ENGINEERING IN HAWAII. Makai Research Pier, Waimanalo, Hawaii. 863 N. Nimitz Hwy, Honolulu Harbor

Port of Vancouver USA Clark College Business Advisory Committee May 9, 2017

PORT TARIFF 2017 / 2018

Appendix A: Project Characteristics

KRISTOPHER J. KRZYSTON, CEI, CEM

Strategic and Operational Plan Implementation of Seaports (Utilization Jeddah Port)

Appendix A SUMMARY OF EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS FOR THE CIVIL DIVISIONS ADJACENT TO THE VILLAGE OF HARTLAND AND WITHIN THE STUDY AREA: 1998

CHAPTER 2 RELATED PROJECTS AND RELATIONSHIP TO STATUTES AND PLANS

GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS

Select U.S. Ports Prepare For Panama Canal Expansion

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR VESSELS BOUND FOR OR LEAVING PORTS OF THE BALTIC SEA STATES AND CARRYING DANGEROUS OR POLLUTING GOODS

The global economy is based on an efficient transportation of goods among countries and continents, and today over 90% of the world's trade is

Investor Presentation February 2018 Slide 1. Investor Presentation February 2018

WELCOME! Public Scoping Meeting for the Proposed Partial or Complete Closure of Defense Fuel Support Point San Pedro, California

Innovating. Shipment Success Through Intelligent Visibility. Issue 20 June 2014

Seward Chamber of Commerce Update

Gulf Intracoastal Waterway

PUBLIC NOTICE LOS ANGELES DISTRICT. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT Port of Los Angeles Berths : Wilmington Waterfront Promenade

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS LBC SHIP DOCK 5 PROJECT SWG HARRIS COUNTIES, TEXAS

Stormwater. Management Program. Port of Anacortes. Western Washington Phase II Municipal. Stormwater. Permit # WAR045711

Anchor Consultants, LLC. Client Satisfaction through Technical Excellence and Responsive Services

Prepared by: Los Angeles Harbor Department 425 S. Palos Verdes Street San Pedro, CA (310)

Project Plan for TAX INCREMENTAL FINANCE DISTRICT #41 (UNIVERSITY-WHITNEY) City of Madison

Suez Canal. The Suez Canal Zone represents a new chapter in the economic development of

INTEGRATED MARINE AGENCY AND LOGISTICS SERVICES

ARTICLE 70, Use Regulations Controlling Industrial Zones

Port St. Joe FLORIDA. Strategic Opportunities for Port St. Joe s Emerging Port. Panama Canal

GNWT Marine Assets and Operations

East St. Tammany Storm Surge Protection Project Request

DEEPWATER COMMERCIAL SEAPORT IN BELOMORSK AS AN IMPORTANT REFERENCE POINT OF ARCTIC POLICY

Woodfibre LNG Limited Response to SIGTTO LNG Ports and Risk Reduction Options

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GALVESTON WHARVES Tariff Circular No. 6

The Port of New York and New Jersey. The Environment

SOCIOECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

THE 2013 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE PORT OF GRAYS HARBOR

18 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

CONTAINER PORT ELEMENT

Transcription:

Port of Long Beach Port Master Plan Overview December 22, 2008

PORT OF LONG BEACH PORT MASTER PLAN OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION In 1978 the California Coastal Commission certified the Port of Long Beach Port Master Plan (PMP) as being in conformance with the policies of Chapters 3 and 8 of the 1976 California Coastal Act. Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act addresses coastal resources planning and management policies. Chapter 8 of the Coastal Act addresses the requirements and provisions for Port Planning, and includes a discussion of general development policies as well as guidelines for the implementation of a Port Master Plan. In 1990 the California Coastal Commission certified an update of the PMP, which is the most recent comprehensive certified update of the document. Previously there was a 1983 certified update. The 1990 update incorporated PMP Amendments 1 5 and serves as PMP Amendment 6. Since 1990 the Port has completed PMP Amendments 7 17, and 19. These amendments, which are project-specific, were also certified by the Coastal Commission. The following reflects the current state of each of the Harbor Planning Districts, incorporating all changes since the 1990 PMP update and subsequent amendments. The complete document and all amendments are available upon request. PERMIT PROCESSING Per the Coastal Act and as an implementation component of the Port Master Plan, the Port has authority to issue Harbor Development Permits for projects within the Harbor District. Permits must include a determination that projects are consistent with the PMP. Level I, II, or III Permits may be issued. The following defines these permitting levels: a) Level I Permits: Encompass developments occurring within the Harbor District that are emergency, administrative, or minor, and expected to have insignificant impacts on the Port or surrounding environment. Level I developments must conform to the following requirements: (1) minimal resources are involved, (2) estimated development costs are less than $400,000 and the development is not part of a larger phased development exceeding $400,000 cost criteria, (3) major changes in land and/or water use are not anticipated, (4) minimal changes in the density or intensity of the use of land and water area are expected, (5) there are no significant adverse environmental impacts, and (6) the development is not an appealable project as defined in Section 30715 of the Coastal Act.

b) Level II Permits: Encompass developments occurring within the Long Beach Harbor District that conform to the following requirements: (1) estimated development costs are greater than $400,000, (2) potential minor changes in the land and/or water use and in the density or intensity of the uses, and (3) minor environmental impacts which can be mitigated. c) Level III Permits: Encompass developments which may involve: (1) large capital expenditures, (2) the risk of substantial adverse environmental impacts that can be mitigated, (3) the potential for unavoidable adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated, (4) potential changes in land and/or water use, and (5) a major increase in the density or intensity of use. These projects include development of new Port facilities such as marine terminals, major structures for recreational purposes, creation of new landfills, major dredging of water areas not presently used for navigation maneuvering or berthing, and in general, major alterations in the use of existing land or water resources. The following categories of development specifically relating to the Port may be appealed to the Coastal Commission prior to the BHC approving a development project. 1) Developments for storage, transmission, and processing liquefied natural gas and crude oil in such quantities as would have significant impact upon the oil and gas supply of the state and/or nation; 2) Wastewater treatment facilities; 3) Roads or highways which are not principally for internal circulation within the Port boundaries; 4) Office buildings not principally devoted to administration of activities within the Port, hotels, motels, and shopping facilities not principally devoted to the sale of commercial goods utilized for water-oriented purposes, commercial fishing facilities, and recreational small craft marina-related facilities; 5) Oil refineries; and 6) Petroleum production plants.

PERMITTED USES The following defines the land uses that are permitted in one or more of the landside Planning Districts: Primary Port Facilities: Areas primarily dependent on access to water frontage. Typically, primary port facilities include ship loading/unloading facilities, transshipment warehouses, stevedoring operations, open storage and transfer areas for cargo, industrial operations primarily engaged in the shipment of goods and raw materials, and cruise ship facilities. Hazardous Cargo Facilities: Operations and terminals engaged in the loading/unloading, storage and transfer of crude and bulk refined petroleum products and chemicals with a National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) rating of 2 or greater. These facilities are normally included in primary port operations, but because of the hazardous nature of the cargoes, they have been categorized separately. In the 1978 PMP this category was entitled Petroleum Import/Export Facilities. Port-Related Industries and Facilities: Areas that do not require access to berthing facilities or water frontage, but are heavily dependent on primary port operations. This dependency necessitates the siting of Port-related uses within the Harbor District. These uses include warehousing, distribution centers, container storage, railroad facilities, container freight stations, offices of public agencies involved in Port activities, and processing operations whose products or raw materials normally move through the Port. Ancillary Port Facilities: Water-dependent areas other than those included as Primary Port facilities. Typical ancillary port facilities are: shipbuilding and repair, towboat and salvage operations, bunker barge loading, sport fishing launching, marine research, Coast Guard operations, marine-oriented fire protection, storage of equipment for dredging and waterfront construction, mobilization area for offshore platform crews or oil spill clean-up operations, and improved harbor maintenance facilities. Commercial/Recreational Facilities: Those areas primarily serving the general public. These areas could include water-oriented parks, sightseeing, sport fishing areas, water skiing areas, restaurants, hotels, shops, marinas, boat sales and manufacturing, charter boat operations, tackle shops, and other special tourist attractions such as the Queen Mary. Federal Use: Areas occupied for various activities such as shipyard and dry dock operations; Navy Base and support operations; reserved vessel storage for the Navy, Coast Guard, and/or other federal agencies.

Oil and Gas Production: Areas utilized for oil and gas production, tankage and processing plants, drilling sites, and water injection wells. Major installations and multiple wells may exist in other land-use areas. These areas will exist in the Port until such a time as the oil and gas have been depleted, or have become uneconomical to produce. Utilities: Areas utilized for surface installations and rights-of-way of public utilities. These uses can occur in conjunction with other Port land uses. Utilities include storm drain, gas, water, electrical, sewage, telephone, waste handling, resource recovery, bunkering, and oil transmission systems. Non-Port Related Areas: Those portions of the Harbor that are devoted to activities other than Port-related, primary port, etc. Typically, these areas might include light industry, commercial businesses, auto salvage, and repair shops. WATER USES The following defines the water uses that are permitted in one or more Planning Districts containing water area: Anchorage Area: These designations are based on the following anchorage assignment categories: (a) 24-hour limited stay, (b) commercial and recreational anchorage with no bunkering or lightering activities, (c) anchorage for lightering and bunkering, (d) deep draft anchorage with 48 hour limit, (e) anchorage for vessels with a draft over 40 feet (12.1 meters) and/or 800 feet (244 meters) in length, (f) explosive anchorage, and (g) anchorage for vessels outside the breakwater. The anchorage areas outside the Harbor District are important to Port operations but, due to governmental restrictions, the federal government has jurisdictional responsibilities over such areas. The Port Terminal Services Representatives participate with the Coast Guard in assigning anchorages. Maneuvering Areas: Water areas needed for the handling, turning, and maneuvering of vessels either entering or leaving the Port. Sufficient turning basins must be available to enable a vessel to be turned completely around. Typically, a maneuvering basin will service a group of berths. Navigable Corridors: Includes all channels used for the movement of vessels into and out of the Port. The main navigable corridors include the Long Beach Main Channel, Back Channel, Cerritos Channel, and Channels Two and Three. Recreational/Sport fishing: Open and sheltered water areas that are used predominately for recreational and sport fishing activities and those facilities in the Port that service these uses.

HARBOR PLANNING DISTRICTS A summary of each Planning District s status follows. The summaries reflect the allowable uses in each district as presented in the 1990 update, and any changes which are reflected in the PMP Amendment summaries at the end of the full PMP document. A map of the Planning District boundaries can be found at the end of this document. DISTRICT 1 - North Harbor Planning District The North Harbor Planning District consists of numerous small, independently owned land parcels which are presently devoted to Port-related and non-portrelated uses. Anaheim Street, the northern boundary of this district, functions as a major route for vehicular traffic entering or leaving the Port. Existing uses on private land remain throughout the North Harbor district and do not need to meet the requirements of the PMP. As private property becomes available the Port obtains and then redevelops property to bring it into consistency with the PMP. Port-Related Non-Port Uses for a 3-Acre Homeless Shelter DISTRICT 2 - Northeast Harbor Planning District The Northeast Harbor Planning District is the oldest part of the harbor and traditionally contained a substantial amount of privately-owned land. The Port, over the years, has pursued the purchase of privately owned property for primary port terminal development. Some private property still remains in this district. Port-Related Hazardous Cargo Facilities Navigation

DISTRICT 3 - Northwest Harbor Planning District District 3 lies partly within the Long Beach Harbor District (City of Long Beach) and partly within the City of Los Angeles. Utilities DISTRICT 4 - Terminal Island Planning District (Prior to 1990 Update known as Federal Use Planning District ) Up until 1994, the Federal Use Planning District was principally used by the U.S. Navy for shipyard and base operations. PMP Amendment 9 in 1996 modified the Planning District, and PMP Amendment 13 in 1998 provided the Port with permitting authority over this realigned district. The realignment absorbed former District 2 the West Harbor Planning District as well as portions of the Northwest Planning District and the Middle Harbor Planning District. Hazardous Cargo Facilities Port- Related Navigation Federal Uses Utilities Police Headquarters and Training Academy DISTRICT 5 - Middle Harbor Planning District Port-Related

DISTRICT 6 - Southwest Harbor Planning District This district is an open-water area. Anchorage Area Hazardous Cargo Facilities DISTRICT 7 - Navigation Planning District District 7 contains the Main Channel linking Queen s Gate to other portions of the harbor. This channel provides direct deep draft access to the Southeast Basin, Middle Harbor, Southwest Harbor, and the Federal Use area. Navigation DISTRICT 8 - Southeast Harbor Planning District Port- Related DISTRICT 9 - Queensway Bay Planning District The Queensway Bay Planning District generally includes the Pier H area. Recreation Commercial DISTRICT 10 - Outer Harbor Planning District Navigation Maneuvering

1 3 2 5 4 9 8 7 6 10 1 North Harbor 2 Northeast Harbor 3 Northwest Harbor 4 Terminal Island 5 Middle Harbor 6 Southwest Harbor 7 Navigation Area 8 Southeast Harbor 9 Queensway Bay 10 Outer Harbor FIGURE 1 LONG BEACH HARBOR PLANNING DISTRICTS