Underground Storage of Natural Gas Liquids in Ohio s Underground Salt Deposits

Similar documents
Class II Saltwater Disposal Wells in Ohio: Understanding the Avenue to Success

An Evaluation of Well Construction/Drilling/Conversion Methodologies Associated with Gas Storage Depleted Field Operations in the United States

J. Daniel Arthur, P.E., ALL Consulting. Author. Ground Water Protection Council January 2009 San Antonio, Texas. Presented at

ESV Corporate Structure Summary

CONSTRUCTION & PERMITTING ISSUES FOR PADS & IMPOUNDMENTS AUGUST 28, 2013

Marcellus Shale Gas Play. Tetra Tech Capabilities

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Class I Injection Wells in Texas

3 rd Shale Play Water Management Marcellus and Utica COLLABORATION CASE STUDY

Injection Wells. An injection well is a vertical pipe in the ground into which water, other liquids, or gases are

Facts of Myths of the Marcellus Shale: A Scientific Perspective

The Opportunities, Challenges, and Unknowns of Shale Gas Exploration

Drilling for Natural Gas in the Marcellus and Utica Shales: Environmental Regulatory Basics

Water Issues Relating to Unconventional Oil and Gas Production

Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Bureau of Mining and Minerals Regulation. Regulation of Mines. Howard J. Hayes, Program Administrator

Presented by: J. Daniel Arthur, P.E., SPEC ALL Consulting. Presented at: 23 rd IPEC Conference November 8-10, 2016 New Orleans, Louisiana

DEEP INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION

Shale Gas Operations. February 23, 2012

PHMSA Requirements for Underground Storage of Natural Gas

ENVIRONMENTAL HYDROGEOLOGY

Safely Harvesting Energy

Tennessee Underground Injection Control Program Overview

Water Management Planning in the Eagle Ford Shale Play

Platts NGLs Conference. September 24, 2013

Water Dependency of Geothermal Power Generation Systems

North America Midstream Infrastructure through 2035: Capitalizing on Our Energy Abundance

Chapter 11 Fossil Fuels

Chesapeake Energy. Shale Operations Overview

Tri-State Shale Coalition: Shale & Downstream Development

California Well Stimulation Treatment Regulations

Overview Gas & NGL Processing

2013 Marcellus Shale Production and Utica Information Summary

Appalachian Basin Test Site at FirstEnergy s R.E. Burger Plant

Pennsylvania Hydraulic Fracturing State Review September, 2010

DAVID SPEARS STATE GEOLOGIST

UIC Program & Natural Gas Storage

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Agricultural Sciences MARCELLUS SHALE NATURAL GAS DRILLING OPERATORS

OUR CONVERSATION TODAY

AEP CCS Project Update Mountaineer Plant - New Haven, WV

Bottled Water: What s the problem?

U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015

Considerations for hydraulic fracturing and groundwater and surface water protection: lessons learned in the U.S.

Water Resources and Oil & Gas Production. Robert W. Puls, Ph.D. Director, Oklahoma Water Survey University of Oklahoma

Slurry Injection Technology

CLASS II DISPOSAL WELL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES WORKSHOP

Ohio Department of NATURAL RESOURCES

Natural Gas A Game Changer

Horizontal Fracking. Melanie Houston, Director of Water Policy & Environmental Health. Ohio Environmental Council. April 4, /6/2013 1

NEXUS Gas Transmission

The Marcellus Shale... By the Numbers*

GWPC Shale Gas and Water Use Presentation September 28, 2010

Chapter 9. Water Sourcing and Wastewater Disposal for Marcellus Shale Development in Pennsylvania

Remote Sensing and Non-renewable Energy Resources

U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, 2012

Petroleum Engineering Minor

Geological Storage: Underground Gas Storage

Williams in the Northeast. Canton The Utica Capital Seminar Kristopher Evanto, Manager - Development, Utica June 10, 2015

Site selection: Technical site selection criteria and information needs

Hydraulic Fracturing, Shale Gas, and Water The Water Council September 10, 2013

UNDERGROUND INJECTION AND SEQUESTRATION AND UNDERGROUND SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER (PROTECTING A VALUABLE RESOURCE)

Current Regulatory Issues Impacting the Appalachian Basin. Gary E. Slagel Steptoe & Johnson PLLC October, 2014

SHALE FACTS. Production cycle. Ensuring safe and responsible operations

Evaluation of Western Kentucky s Heavy Oil and Bitumen Resources

Water Management Barnett Shale November 21, 2008

Division Mandates. Supervise the drilling, operation, and maintenance of wells to prevent damage to life, health, property, and natural resources.

PetroChem Wire. Building more crackers in Appalachia: Is there a there there?

THE ECONOMIC POTENTIAL FROM DEVELOPING NORTH CAROLINA S ON-SHORE AND OFF-SHORE ENERGY RESOURCES

Shale Investment Dashboard in Ohio

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Resource Management Division Office of Oil, Gas, and Minerals

Water Use for Oil & Gas Operations in Oklahoma

Well-Based Monitoring

Instructor s t Background

CONCENTRATE AND BRINE MANAGEMENT THROUGH DEEP WELL INJECTION. Abstract

TECHNICAL INFORMATION ABOUT UNDERGROUND STORAGE RESERVOIRS FOR NATURAL GAS

U.S. Ethane Crackers and Ethylene Derivative Capacity Additions

The Application of Produced Water Treatment and Water Blending in Shale Resource Development

Description of Project. Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested# October 28, 2009

Research into the Characterization of Brackish Water and Disposal of Desalination Reject Water in Saline Aquifers and Depleted Oil and Gas Reservoirs

SUMMARY OF WATER QUALITY IMPACTS FROM HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS WELL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN NORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA

WATER AND THE HYDROLOGIC CYCLE

State Shale Gas Regulation in the Appalachian Basin:

WELL RECORD INSTRUCTIONS (Unconventional Operators only)

Telephone Lake project

Natural Gas Extraction. Key Environmental Issues in US EPA Region 2 May 29, 2014

In this unit we will be exploring: 1. Location of natural resources 2. Diverse perspectives on natural resources 3. Sustainable development

Barrier verification and leakage risk. Dave Gardner, IRIS Norwegian Oil and Gas Plug & Abandonment Seminar October 18 th 2017

Blowout Uncontrolled flow of gas, oil or other well fluids from a well

1. Activate students' prior knowledge about the environmental effects of extracting energy resources.

SUBCHAPTER 8. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL (UIC) PROGRAM

Drilling Waste and Well Site Restoration

Compressor Stations...29 Metering Stations...30 Control Station and SCADA System...31

INDUSTRIAL FORT SASKATCHEWAN S. fortsask.ca/business LOCATION CONNECTIONS GROWTH

Michael R. Styler Executive Director

Ohio Maritime Study. Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference (OTEC) October 10, 2017 Columbus, OH

Underground Storage of Refrigerated Natural Gas in Granites of the Southeastern U.S.

Growing Interest in Beneficial Use of Produced Water

2013 End of Year Oil and Gas Development Radiation Study Report

Effects of Enhanced Oil Recovery on Production Engineers, Elm Coulee Field, Bakken Reservoir, Richland County, Montana

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER QUALITY DIVISION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL (UIC) CLASS V WELL

The Oklahoma Water Conundrum. D. Steven Tipton, PE September 28-30, 2015 Ground Water Protection Council Annual Forum Oklahoma City, OK

EPA s Underground Injection Control Program Overview. Solid Waste Advisory Committee Meeting June 5, 2014

Transcription:

Underground Storage of Natural Gas Liquids in Ohio s Underground Salt Deposits Prepared by: Thomas E. Tomastik, CPG and J. Daniel Arthur, P.E., SPEC, ALL Consulting Presented at the 2018 Ground Water Protection Council UIC Conference, February 11-14, 2018 in Tulsa, Oklahoma

Introduction 2 With the development of the world class Marcellus Shale play and the Utica, the wet gas production of natural gas liquids (NGLs) such as propane, butane, and ethane have risen dramatically. Natural gas production from these plays are projected to rise by 30% or more by 2022 (currently at 24 Bcf per day) and NGLs are expected to increase even more quickly. This production will continue to push development of NGL infrastructure such as takeaway capacity, gas-processing plants, and fractionators, which all leads to the demand for storage of NGLs.

3 Source: Brockett, Penn State Extension, 2015

4 Source: Brockett, Penn State Extension, 2015

5 Source: Brockett, Penn State Extension, 2015

Demand for NGL Storage 6 Shell Chemicals and the potential PTT Global Chemical cracker plants are driving the need for NGL storage. The recently released report identifies the potential for an Appalachian Storage Hub for NGLs. The geological evaluation included mined caverns, depleted gas reservoirs, and salt-solution mined caverns. Source: WVU, 2017

7 Source: WVU, 2017

Shell Chemicals Ethylene Cracker Plant in Beaver County, PA 8 Source: wvmetronews.com

Current Underground Storage Operations in Ohio 9 Ohio currently has four NGL underground storage operations that are active. These facilities store mainly propane and butane. Three of these active NGL storage facilities are in hard rock mined out caverns. One facility is in solution-mined caverns. Three of these facilities are located at Ohio refineries. These NGL storage operations commenced in the late 1950s to early 1970s.

Potential Underground Storage 10 The state of Ohio lies directly in the center of attention relative to underground storage. Favorable geologic conditions in the underlying Salina salt deposits along the Ohio River exist for the development of salt cavern storage for NGLs. Liquid hydrocarbon storage in salt is the most common form of bulk storage used in the U.S. today.

Salina Salt Deposits 11 The Salina salt deposits have been mechanically mined in Ohio since the 1950s and have been solution mined since the late 1800s. Salt thicknesses can vary, but the F salt unit is the primary target. Depths to the top of the salt ranges from about 1,900 feet along Lake Erie to over 6,700 feet along the Ohio River. The only active storage in the salt in Ohio is at Marathon Petroleum s refinery in Canton, Ohio, where butane is currently being stored. Source: Tomastik, 1996

12 Source: Tomastik, 2001

Salt-Solution Mining Process 13 Water is injected down the tubing and is returned to the surface through the annular space. Referred to as reverse circulation or tubing injection. Produces a more desirable shaped cavity, but with a reduced production rate. Source: Tomastik, 2001

Cavern Creation and Storage 14 Initial Class III salt-solution mining injection operations dissolve the salt to create caverns for storage. After the caverns are created, NGLs are injected, which displaces brine in the caverns back to the surface. A surface impoundment must be constructed for storage of the brine displaced from the cavern and to access the brine to inject to displace NGLs when needed. Source: Google Earth, 2018

Permitting Requirements and Challenges 15 Requires coordination with multiple state and federal regulatory agencies: Corps of Engineers 404 permit Ohio DNR, Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management, UIC Section Class II solution mining well permits Ohio DNR, Division of Water Resources, Dam Safety Section- Dam permit for impoundment Ohio EPA Groundwater monitoring plan and 401 permit And other potential regulatory agencies: WV DEP Division of Water and Waste Management Local Ohio EMA floodplain Local WV EMA floodplain Ohio Historical Society Ohio DNR, Office of Real Estate Ohio Dept. Transportation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services

Political and Regulatory Issues 16 In 2013, the Todd Hunter NGL facility in Middletown, Ohio, which operated NGL storage in mined out hard rock caverns, leaked propane. Storage of NGLs in Ohio in mined out hard rock or salt-solution caverns are not currently regulated by any Ohio agency. This has led to concerns and conservative approaches regarding underground storage of NGLs in Ohio. Regulatory agencies are now looking for a risk-based mitigation analysis. However, over one billion barrels of liquid hydrocarbons have been stored underground in the U.S. with very few releases. Source: caplaconference.com, 2015

Ohio DNR Permits Requirements 17 There are two primary permit applications within Ohio DNR. The Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management, UIC Section requires Class III salt-solution mining permits to drill the wells to dissolve the salt and create the caverns. The Division of Water Resources, Dam Safety Section requires a dam construction permit for the creation of a surface impoundment for the storage of the brine from the solution mining caverns.

UIC - Class III Permit Requirements 18 Permits issued with permit conditions: All casing strings must be cemented to the surface. A cement bond log must be performed on the production casing. Initial mechanical integrity testing using the standard annulus pressure test. Establishment of benchmark and survey loops for subsidence monitoring and requirement for annual subsidence monitoring with submittal of an annual report. Five-year mechanical integrity testing requirement using the freshwater-brine interface test.

Dam Safety Dam Construction Permit Requirements 19 Application form with preliminary design, type of dam, and proposed dam classification (I-IV). Cross sections, maps, log of borings, and written report on surficial surface geology, topography, and cultural features. Ability to quickly empty the impoundment in the event of a leak. If proposed impoundment located over an abandoned underground mine, additional technical analysis and reports will be required.

Example of Existing Dam Over Abandoned Underground Mine 20 Source: ODNR, 2017

Additional Dam Requirements 21 Statutory filing fee and surety bond. Final design report. Detailed cost estimate of the contruction. Plans and specifications. Source: ODNR, 2017

Conclusions 22 The permitting process alone, requires a lot of coordination with multiple state and federal agencies. Addressing all regulatory considerations and technical hurdles can be extremely challenging. Best addressed by cooperative efforts with the agencies through meetings, technical assessments, and analysis to satisfy all of the regulatory concerns.

Contact and Citation Information 23 Contact Information: Tom Tomastik, Senior Geologist & Regulatory Specialist ttomastik@all-llc.com ALL Consulting, Tulsa, OK www.all-llc.com Citation Information: Tomastik, Thomas E. and J. Daniel Arthur, Underground Storage of Natural Gas Liquids in Ohio s Underground Salt Deposits. Presented at the 2018 Ground Water Protection Council UIC Conference, February 11-14, 2018 in Tulsa, Oklahoma.