Australian Hereford Selection Indexes

Similar documents
Australian Shorthorn Selection Indexes

Australian Red Angus Selection Indexes

Australian Santa Gertrudis Selection Indexes

Market specifications for beef cattle

The Data Which Breeders May Collect For BREEDPLAN Analysis Includes: Flight time (from bail head to light beam)

BREEDPLAN EBVs The Traits Explained

A Basic Guide to. BREEDPLAN EBVs BREEDPLAN

Estimating Returns from Past Investments into Beef Cattle Genetics RD&E. in Australia

Bred to Solve Problems, Not Create Them

Wagyu 101. Michael Scott Certified Executive Chef Academy of Chefs Corporate Chef for Rosewood Ranches Texas Raised Wagyu Beef

Tools to Assist Genetic Improvement in Central Australia Selecting cattle best suited to the environment and markets

Value-Based Marketing for Feeder Cattle. By Tom Brink, Top Dollar Angus, Inc.

More cattle are being marketed on carcass. Selection for Carcass Merit. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle IX: Genetics of Carcass Merit

How growth affects carcase and meat quality attributes

BLUP and Genomic Selection

Management Basics for Beef Markets. Bethany Funnell, DVM Purdue College of Veterinary Medicine

Dairy Cattle Backgrou d I for atio

Matching Cow Type to the Nutritional Environment

BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEM GUIDELINES. Animal & Grassland Research & Innovation Programme

Meeting Domestic and Export Markets for Beef: Research Outcomes of the Cattle and Beef CRC,

Opportunities exist to increase revenue from cull cows through changes in marketing strategies. This figure shows that cull cow prices tend to bottom

Using EPDs in a Commercial Herd

Prospering in the Global Environment

Commentary: Increasing Productivity, Meat Yield, and Beef Quality through Genetic Selection, Management, and Technology

Benchmark Angus. Engineering Superior Beef

WHETHER dealing with a commercial

Comparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits Among Various Three-Breed Cross Calves

Using Live Animal Carcass Ultrasound Information in Beef Cattle Selection

HCC Scholarship Report. How can farmers be rewarded for producing better eating quality beef?

technical bulletin Enhancements to Angus BREEDPLAN December 2017 Calculation of EBVs for North American Animals

Improving Genetics in the Suckler Herd by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee

Can Selection Indexes Improve Profitability in Beef Cattle

UNDERSTANDING & USING GENEMAX FOCUS TM

Proven Genetic Performance hazeldean.com.au

1999 American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting

Beef genetics for accelerated economic growth

Conformation Assessment

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXIV November 17, 18 and 19, 2015, Loveland, Colorado HOW TO USE COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE GENOMIC PREDICTIONS

Meat quality. What is the future and why is it important? Stephen Conroy, Andrew Cromie & Thierry Pabiou (Irish Cattle Breeding Federation)

Issues in the Animal Agriculture Industry A. Animal Welfare- the humane treatment of animals. 1. Most animal producers and researchers believe in

MCA/MSU Bull Evaluation Program 2016 Buyer Survey and Impact Report

Crossbreeding Systems in Beef Cattle 1

Bone Up On Beef Anticipation Guide Created by Emily Holden of Oregon State University

Welcome to Igenity Brangus and the Power of Confident Selection

Animal response or performance is determined. Genetic-Environmental Interaction. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle II:

Heterosis and Breed Effects for Beef Traits of Brahman Purebred and Crossbred Steers

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

T H E W O R L D S B E S T TA S T I N G T E N D E R B E E F

Jesse D. Savell University of Florida

Development of an Economic Breeding Index EBI for Ireland. Ross Evans (ICBF)

ANSC 415 BEEF CATTLE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT SPRING 2013

Establishment of a Single National Selection Index for Canada

How we feed our beef

29 th Annual BIC Bull Sale

Breed Utilization and Production Efficiency

UF Station Report S

ECONOMICALLY RELEVANT TRAITS AND SELECTION INDICES

Understanding and Using Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XVIII December 9, 10, 11, 2003, Mitchell Nebraska

Prediction of Carcass Traits Using Live Animal Ultrasound

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

CHARACTERIZATION OF HEREFORD AND TWO-BREED ROTATIONAL CROSSES OF HEREFORD W ANGUS AND SIMMENTAL CAllLE: CALF PRODUCTION THROUGH WEANING

Throughout this manual, the goal has been to improve the

Residual feed intake and greenhouse gas emissions in beef cattle

NAME: STATE: Intermediate Cattlemen s Quiz: Version A. For Questions 1-7 use the following scenario

Applications of Genomic Technology to Cattle Breeding and Management

Round Table Discussion. Does the Seedstock Industry Focus on the Needs of the Commercial Cow/Calf Producer?

1 This research was conducted under cooperative agreements between USDA, ARS, Montana Agric. Exp.

Beef Improvement New Zealand Inc.

TECHNICAL BULLETIN December 2017

FARMERS INFORMATION SERIES ABERDEEN ANGUS. Management Guide. blade-farming.com

Selecting a Beef System by Pearse Kelly

Productive Longevity in Beef Cows. Jim Sanders, Animal Science Dept., Texas A&M University

TECHNICAL BULLETIN GENEMAX FOCUS - EVALUATION OF GROWTH & GRADE FOR COMMERCIAL USERS OF ANGUS GENETICS. November 2016

Upper Midwest Devon Cattle Workshop & Sale

2

A COMPARISON OF BEEF CATTLE BREEDING METHODS TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE. D.G. Landblom and J.L. Nelson

A model of the New Zealand beef value chain: evaluating opportunities

Nichols Farms. Angus. Private Treaty Bull Sale 65 Years of. Superior Beef Genetics 4/25/18

The National Livestock Genetics Consortium for the genetic improvement of beef cattle and sheep

Argentina by the numbers. Population 38,592,000. Capital: Buenos Aires 13,239,000. Area - square km. 2,780,400. GDP per capita U.S.

Nichols Farms. Angus 8/12. Private Treaty Bull Sale 64 Years of. Superior Beef Genetics

COW CALF BREEDING AND GENETICS. Dhuyvetter

Effects of Backgrounding and Growing Programs on Beef Carcass Quality and Yield

University of Florida Presentation. By: Jerry Bohn

Beef cattle recording and selection

Genetic improvement in feed efficiency in beef cattle

NAME: STATE: Senior Quiz Version B

SELECTION FOR IMPROVED FEED EFFICIENCY: A GENOMICS APPROACH. Matt Spangler, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Fall Calving in North Dakota By Brian Kreft

Genetics of dairy production

A Comparison of Milk Production In

The Australian Wagyu Association. Draft Five Year Strategic Plan. Australian Wagyu Association Strategic Plan

Carcass Video Images in Genetic Evaluation and Breeding Program in Ireland

The Cattle and Chickens

Beef - Horse - Poultry - Sheep - Swine. August 2016

An Economic Comparison of AI and Bull Breeding

Transcription:

Australian Hereford Selection Indexes There are currently four different selection indexes calculated for Australian Hereford animals. These are: Supermarket Index Grass Fed Steer Index Grain Fed Steer Index EU Index Each selection index describes a different production/market scenario and relates to a typical self replacing commercial herd in temperate Australia using Hereford bulls and targeting the following specifications. Supermarket Index - Estimates the genetic differences between animals in net profitability per cow joined in a commercial self replacing herd targeting the domestic supermarket trade. Steers are either finished on grass or grain (e.g. 50 70 days) with steers slaughtered at 500 kg live weight (270 kg HSCW and 12 mm P8 fat depth) at 17 months of age. Daughters are retained for breeding. Emphasis has been placed on eating quality and tenderness to favour animals that are suited to MSA requirements. Grass Fed Steer Index - Estimates the genetic differences between animals in net profitability per cow joined in a commercial self replacing herd targeting pasture finished steers. Steers are slaughtered at 600 kg live weight (330 kg HSCW and 8 mm P8 fat depth) at 23 months of age. Daughters are retained for breeding. Emphasis has been placed on eating quality and tenderness to favour animals that are suited to MSA requirements. This index is suitable for use by both straight bred Hereford herds and in crossbreeding programs where Hereford bulls are being used over a Bos indicus based cow herd. Grain Fed Steer Index Estimates the genetic differences between animals in net profitability per cow joined in a commercial self replacing herd targeting pasture grown steers with a 125 day feedlot finishing period for the grain fed high quality, highly marbled markets. Steers are slaughtered at 600 kg live weight (330 kg HSCW and 20 mm P8 fat depth) at 20 months of age. Daughters are retained for breeding. There is a significant premium if steers reach a marble score of 2 or greater. This index is suitable for use by both straight bred Hereford herds and in black baldy crossbreeding programs where Hereford bulls are being used over an Angus based cow herd. EU Index Estimates the genetic differences between animals in net profitability per cow joined in a commercial self replacing herd targeting the EU market. Steers are either finished on grass or grain (e.g. 125 days) with steers slaughtered at 600 kg live weight (330 kg HSCW and 20 mm P8 fat depth) at 20 months of age. Daughters are retained for breeding. Emphasis has been placed on eating quality and tenderness to favour animals that are suited to MSA requirements. All selection index values have been derived using BreedObject technology. More detailed information regarding each selection index is provided on the following pages. If you have any further queries regarding Hereford Selection Indexes, please do not hesitate to contact staff at your BREEDPLAN processing centre.

Hereford Supermarket Index The Hereford Supermarket Index estimates the genetic differences between animals in net profitability per cow joined in a commercial self replacing herd targeting the domestic supermarket trade. Steers are either finished on grass or grain (e.g. 50 70 days) with steers slaughtered at 500 kg live weight (270 kg HSCW and 12 mm P8 fat depth) at 17 months of age. Daughters are retained for breeding. Emphasis has been placed on eating quality and tenderness to favour animals that are suited to MSA requirements. The following bar graph shows the key economic traits that are important in this selection index. The different trait emphases reflect the underlying profit drivers in a commercial operation targeting this production system and market. Considering the genetic relationship between the key profit drivers and the EBVs that are available, the bar graph below illustrates the different emphasis that has been placed on each EBV within this selection index. The sign indicates the direction of the emphasis. For example, greater 600 Day Weight EBVs and shorter Days to Calving EBVs are favoured.

While the graphs on the previous page show the different profit drivers and emphases that have been placed on each EBV within the Supermarket Selection Index, they do not illustrate the likely change that will occur to each individual trait if producers select animals using this selection index. The response to selection will also be influenced by such factors as the genetic relationship between traits and the animals that are available for selection. For example, while there only a very small direct weighting on 400 Day Weight in this selection index, it would be expected that growth to 400 days would increase considerably as there is a large weighting on 600 Day Weight. The following bar graph provides an indication of the relative change that would be expected in each individual trait if producers select animals using the Supermarket Selection Index. The graph reflects the relative change if the Hereford Published Sires (at the January 2014 Hereford GROUP BREEDPLAN analysis) were ranked on this selection index and the Top 10% selected for use within a breeding program. The response to selection may differ if a different group of animals were available for selection.

Hereford Grass Fed Steer Index The Hereford Grass Fed Steer Index estimates the genetic differences between animals in net profitability per cow joined in a commercial self replacing herd targeting pasture finished steers. Steers are slaughtered at 600 kg live weight (330 kg HSCW and 8 mm P8 fat depth) at 23 months of age. Daughters are retained for breeding. Emphasis has been placed on eating quality and tenderness to favour animals that are suited to MSA requirements. This index is suitable for use by both straight bred Hereford herds and in crossbreeding programs where Hereford bulls are being used over a Bos indicus based cow herd. The following bar graph shows the key economic traits that are important in this selection index. The different trait emphases reflect the underlying profit drivers in a commercial operation targeting this production system and market. Considering the genetic relationship between the key profit drivers and the EBVs that are available, the bar graph below illustrates the different emphasis that has been placed on each EBV within this selection index. The sign indicates the direction of the emphasis. For example, greater 600 Day Weight EBVs and shorter Days to Calving EBVs are favoured.

While the graphs on the previous page show the different profit drivers and emphases that have been placed on each EBV within the Grass Fed Steer Selection Index, they do not illustrate the likely change that will occur to each individual trait if producers select animals using this selection index. The response to selection will also be influenced by such factors as the genetic relationship between traits and the animals that are available for selection. For example, while there only a very small direct weighting on 400 Day Weight in this selection index, it would be expected that growth to 400 days would increase considerably as there is a large weighting on 600 Day Weight. The following bar graph provides an indication of the relative change that would be expected in each individual trait if producers select animals using the Grass Fed Steer Selection Index. The graph reflects the relative change if the Hereford Published Sires (at the January 2014 Hereford GROUP BREEDPLAN analysis) were ranked on this selection index and the Top 10% selected for use within a breeding program. The response to selection may differ if a different group of animals were available for selection.

Hereford Grain Fed Steer Index The Hereford Grain Fed Steer Index estimates the genetic differences between animals in net profitability per cow joined in a commercial self replacing herd targeting pasture grown steers with a 125 day feedlot finishing period for the grain fed high quality, highly marbled markets. Steers are slaughtered at 600 kg live weight (330 kg HSCW and 20 mm P8 fat depth) at 20 months of age. Daughters are retained for breeding. There is a significant premium if steers reach a marble score of 2 or greater. This index is suitable for use by both straight bred Hereford herds and in black baldy crossbreeding programs where Hereford bulls are being used over an Angus based cow herd. The following bar graph shows the key economic traits that are important in this selection index. The different trait emphases reflect the underlying profit drivers in a commercial operation targeting this production system and market. Considering the genetic relationship between the key profit drivers and the EBVs that are available, the bar graph below illustrates the different emphasis that has been placed on each EBV within this selection index. The sign indicates the direction of the emphasis. For example, greater 600 Day Weight EBVs and shorter Days to Calving EBVs are favoured.

While the graphs on the previous page show the different profit drivers and emphases that have been placed on each EBV within the Grain Fed Steer Selection Index, they do not illustrate the likely change that will occur to each individual trait if producers select animals using this selection index. The response to selection will also be influenced by such factors as the genetic relationship between traits and the animals that are available for selection. For example, while there only a very small direct weighting on 400 Day Weight in this selection index, it would be expected that growth to 400 days would increase considerably as there is a large weighting on 600 Day Weight. The following bar graph provides an indication of the relative change that would be expected in each individual trait if producers select animals using the Grain Fed Steer Selection Index. The graph reflects the relative change if the Hereford Published Sires (at the January 2014 Hereford GROUP BREEDPLAN analysis) were ranked on this selection index and the Top 10% selected for use within a breeding program. The response to selection may differ if a different group of animals were available for selection.

Hereford EU Index The Hereford EU Index estimates the genetic differences between animals in net profitability per cow joined in a commercial self replacing herd targeting the EU market. Steers are either finished on grass or grain (e.g. 125 days) with steers slaughtered at 600 kg live weight (330 kg HSCW and 20 mm P8 fat depth) at 20 months of age. Daughters are retained for breeding. Emphasis has been placed on eating quality and tenderness to favour animals that are suited to MSA requirements. The following bar graph shows the key economic traits that are important in this selection index. The different trait emphases reflect the underlying profit drivers in a commercial operation targeting this production system and market. Considering the genetic relationship between the key profit drivers and the EBVs that are available, the bar graph below illustrates the different emphasis that has been placed on each EBV within this selection index. The sign indicates the direction of the emphasis. For example, greater 600 Day Weight EBVs and shorter Days to Calving EBVs are favoured.

While the graphs on the previous page show the different profit drivers and emphases that have been placed on each EBV within the EU Selection Index, they do not illustrate the likely change that will occur to each individual trait if producers select animals using this selection index. The response to selection will also be influenced by such factors as the genetic relationship between traits and the animals that are available for selection. For example, while there is while there is only a very small direct weighting on 400 Day Weight in this selection index, it would be expected that growth to 400 days would increase considerably as there is a large weighting on 600 Day Weight. The following bar graph provides an indication of the relative change that would be expected in each individual trait if producers select animals using the EU Selection Index. The graph reflects the relative change if the Hereford Published Sires (at the January 2014 Hereford GROUP BREEDPLAN analysis) were ranked on this selection index and the Top 10% selected for use within a breeding program. The response to selection may differ if a different group of animals were available for selection.