International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 1, January ISSN

Similar documents
VOL. 4, NO. 1, January 2014 ISSN ARPN Journal of Science and Technology All rights reserved.

Agronomic Performance Evaluation of Ten Sugarcane Varieties under Wonji-Shoa Agro-Climatic Conditions

Effect of number of buds per sett and intra-row spacing of setts on yield and yield components of sugarcane

Geremew Awas*, Teshome Abdisa, Kasaye Tolesa and Amenti Chali. Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, P. O. Box, 35 Ziway, Ethiopia.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE PARAMETERS OF SUGARCANE VARIETY HOTH-300 AS AFFECTED BY DIFFERENT LEVELS OF NPK APPLICATIONS ABSTRACT

The Sugarcane: An Agriculture Aspect

International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences ISSN : Research Article

CORRELATION AND PATH ANALYSIS OF YIELD AND ITS COMPONENT IN SUGARCANE. M. S. Yahaya ; A.M. Falaki; E.B. Amans and L.D. Busari

Response of sugarcane ratoon to nitrogen in form of ammonium nitrate and urea

Influence of Sesbania Rostrata on Soil Properties and Yield of Onion

Effects of Machine-Induced Soil Compaction on Growth and Yield of Sugarcane

Effect of Different Set Sizes, Spacings and Nitrogen Levels on the Growth and Bulb Yield of Onion

Response of newly released cotton varieties to plant spacing and density, under rain-fed conditions, at Damazin. Osama M. A.

Sugarcane Flowering in Relation to Nitrogen Fertilization and Ratoon

PROGRESS REPORT VIUSID AGRO TRIAL ON SUGAR CANE WITH PT. PERKEBUNAN NUSANTARA X

Effects of Zinc on variety performance in terms of Yield and Yield Attributing Characters of Rice at Karma R & D Center, Jyotinagar

MICRO-SPRINKLER IRRIGATION AND FUSTIGATION AND LAND CONFIGURATION AS A BEST MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY PACKAGE FOR GROUNDNUT

Advanced Techniques in Biology &

Research Article Response of Wheat Crop to Humic Acid and Nitrogen Levels

VOL. 3, NO. 1, January 2013 ISSN ARPN Journal of Science and Technology All rights reserved.

Evaluation of mid-late clones of sugarcane for their cane yield and yield components

RESPONSE OF MAIZE TO PLANTING METHODS AND FERTILIZER N

SOIL FERTILITY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE IN 2007

RESPONSE OF PROMISING SUGARCANE CLONES/VARIETIES UNDER AGRO ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF FAISALABAD.

EFFECT OF ROW SPACING ON SEEDCANE YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS IN WESTERN KENYA

The effect of foliar application of zinc (Zn) on yield and yield components of irrigated wheat cultivars in ahvaz weather conditions

Cowdung: soil amendment agent for the sandy upland sugarcane ecology in Nigeria

Effect of Consortium of Endophytic Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria on Yield Observations of Seasonal (Suru) Sugarcane under Drip Irrigation

PERFORMANCE OF VARIOUS HYBRIDS OF SUNFLOWER IN PESHAWAR VALLEY

Application of 50 kg K2O/ha, 30 days prior to harvesting of plant cane with irrigation water, resulted in better sprouting of winter harvested cane.

GROWTH AND YIELD RESPONSE OF SUGARCANE (S OFFICINARUM) UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION REGIMES AND NITROGEN RATES

SUGARCANE BUD CUTTING MACHINE

Performance of Some Sugar Cane Promising Varieties under Different Seed Sett Rates and Potassium Fertilization

STUDIES ON THE EFFECT OF RATIOS AND LEVELS OF NPK FERTILIZER NUTRIENTS ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF HYBRID SUNFLOWER UNDER RAINFED FARMING SITUATIONS

Effect of Plant Spacing on Yield and Fruit Characteristics of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)

The Effects of Chemical and Organic Fertilizers on Saffron Flowering

EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF CHICKPEA/ CICER ARIETINUM) AT KELEMEDA, SOUTH WOLLO, ETHIOPIA

Yield quality response (YQR) of pepper under variable water application using micro-sprinkler system

Residual effects of fertilizer application on growth and yield of two cassava varieties in Ibadan, south-western Nigeria.

Department of Agronomy, SG CARS, Jagdalpur, Bastar, Chhattisgarh , India

Effect of fertilizer application and the main nutrient limiting factors for yield and quality of sugarcane production in Guangxi red soil

K. S. SOMASHEKAR*, B. G. SHEKARA 1, K. N. KALYANA MURTHY AND L. HARISH 2 SUMMARY

"Depanment of Agricultural Economics INTRODUCTION

Effect of level and time of nitrogen fertilizer application and cutting height on yield and yield component of rice ratooning

Performance of Baby Corn under Different Plant Densities and Fertility Levels in Lateritic Soils of Eastern India

OPTIMUM IRRIGATION OF WHEAT PRODUCTION AT BAU FARM

Performance of wheat yield under different fertilizer types, application and doses at Northern Sudan State

Efficacy and Economics of Urea Spray Technology for a Locally Discovered Rice Cultivar Haridhan in Bangladesh

Growth and Yield of Organic Rice as Affected by Rice Straw and Organic Fertilizer

Using of water treatment sludge from frozen seafood factory for vegetable production

YIELD OF IRRIGATED COOL-SEASON GRASSES IN SOUTHWESTERN KANSAS

Statement. Innovative Method for Rice Irrigation with High Potential of Water Saving. Yousri Ibrahim Atta

Introduction. Materials and Methods

Kiberashi integrated soil fertility management trials. Protocols 2010

Optimum water requirement of some boro rice mutant lines

Effect of Farmyard Manure and Inorganic Fertilizers on the Growth, Yield and Moisture Stress Tolerance of Rain-fed Lowland Rice

Soil Compaction in Sugarcane Fields Induced by Mechanization

Nitrogen Availability from Potato-Processing Wastewater for Growing Corn

VARIATION IN WOOD PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF EUCALYPTUS PELLITA GROWING IN SEEDLING SEED ORCHARD IN PLEIHARI, SOUTH KALIMANTAN

NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND YIELD OF ONION AS INFLUENCED BY NITROGEN AND SULPHUR FERTILIZATION

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Valor and Velpar K4 Application Timing and Cane Tolerance Test

PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFITABILITY OF SUGARCANE FARMING

Correlation Studies of Yield and Yield Contributing Characters and Quality Parameters of...

USING TITHONIA AS A FERTILISER

Bourgault Agronomy Trials March 13, 2017 Bourgault Industries Ltd Curtis de Gooijer PAg, CCA

PERFORMANCE OF CANOLA (BRASSICA NAPUS L.) UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION LEVELS

RESPONSE OF EXTRA-EARLY MAIZE (Zea mays L.) TO VARYING INTRA-ROW SPACING AND HILL DENSITY

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SASRI VARIETIES N19 AND N25 IN TANZANIA

SEED QUALITY AS INFLUENCED BY ORGANIC AND INORGANIC FERTILIZERS IN ONION (Allium cepa L.) ROHIT KUMAR AND *VADDORIA, M. A.

RESPONSE OF WHEAT TO FOLIAR AND SOIL APPLICATION OF UREA AT DIFFERENT GROWTH STAGES

Influence of organic manures with recommended inorganic fertilizers on yield of sweet orange (Bari malta 1)

THE INFLUENCES OF PLANT DENSITY ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF COMMON BEANS (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)

SMALL PLOT EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES AGAINST THE SUGARCANE BORER, 2014

Deliverable 2 Final Report and Proposed P Soil Test Calibration FDACS Contract

EFFECT OF INTRA-ROW SPACING ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF GARLIC (ALLIUM SATIVUM) AT THE EXPERIMENTAL SITE OF WOLLO UNIVERSITY, SOUTH WOLLO, ETHIOPIA

Effects of Intra-Row Spacing on Vegetative Growth Performance of Potato (Solanumtuberosum L) at Wolkite University, Ethiopia

EFFECT OF HARVESTING STAGE AND NUTRIENT LEVELS ON NUTRITIVE VALUES OF NATURAL PASTURE IN CENTRAL HIGHLANDS OF ETHIOPIA

EFFECT OF PLANT POPULATION ON MAIZE HYBRIDS

Nature Farming Research in Myanmar: Effect of Organic Amendments and EM on Rice Production Abstract Introduction

The effect of N fertilizer rates on agronomic parameters, yield components and yields of maize grown on Alfisols of North western Ethiopia

(Ipomoea aquatica), and on soil fertility, of

Peiyuan Qian, Jeff Schoenau, Tom King and Cory Fatteicher. Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N-5A8

Abstract. Introduction. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 21 (No 4) 2015, Agricultural Academy

ESTIMATING THE FAMILY PERFORMANCE OF SUGARCANE CROSSES USING SMALL PROGENY TEST. Canal Point, FL. 2

Response of sesame to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization in Northern Sudan

In-Crop Application of Liquid Hog Manure in Irrigated Potato Production

Economic Analysis of the Effect of Fertilizer Application on the Performance of White Guinea Yam in Different Ecological Zones of Edo State, Nigeria

Soil Phosphorous Influence on Growth and Nutrition of Tropical Legume Cover Crops in Acidic Soil

Effects of Plantain (Musa species) as Shade on the Growth Performance of Cocoa Seedlings in the Nursery at Ibadan, Southwest, Nigeria

STABILITY OF SUGARCANE (SACCHARUM OFFICINARUM L.) GENOTYPES FOR SUGAR YIELD UNDER THREE SOIL TYPES

EFFECT OF WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON WEED GROWTH AND YIELD OF MAIZE

Defoliation, Harvest, and Cotton Quality. Philip Jost University of Georgia

The Interactive Effect of Organic and Chemical Fertilizers on Bread Wheat Yield in Subtropical Environmental Conditions

Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation rate on nitrate present in the profile of a sandy farmland in Northwest China

Journal of Soil and Nature (JSN)

Keshavaiah K. V. *1, Palled Y. B. *2 and Shankaraiah C. *3

2013 Research Report Impact of Cover Crops and Field Corn Stover Removal on Squash Yield.

EVALUATION OF Centrosema rotundifolium FOR SAND-SOIL SAVANNAS IN EASTERN VENEZUELA. Stuttgart, Germany. Abstract

Effect of Slow Releasing Nitrogen Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Sugarcane

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS

Transcription:

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 1, January 2013 1 Effect of Different Nitrogen Rates and Time of Application in Improving Yield and Quality of Seed Cane of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. L.) Variety B41/227 Mengistu Sime Department of Plant Sciences, School of Agriculture, Adama Science and Technology University, P.O.Box 1888, Adama, Ethiopia E-mail: simemengistu@gmail.com; msimeb@yahoo.com Abstract- A two-phase field experiment on the effect of N application was studied on growth, yield and quality of seed cane of sugarcane variety, B41/227 at Finchaa Sugarcane Plantation during 2000/2001 and 2002/2003 cropping years. Thirty two treatments comprised of four N levels 0, 46, 92 and 138kg/ha, and applied at 2 1 / 2, 5 and 7 1 / 2 months after planting in whole and split applications were used in RCBD with three replications. The source of fertilizer is urea (46%N), which is the commonly used fertilizer in the plantation. The results of the experiment showed that application of high N rate resulted in better plant height, stalk population, stalk length as well as higher sett yield and improved sprouting of buds. In phase-1 experiment, significantly higher sett yield was obtained for the highest rate of 138kgN/ha applied in single, double and triple doses over the control. Apart from other treatments, application of 138kgN/ha in two doses at two and half and five months significantly increased stalk population and sett yield by 39.1 and 51.7%, respectively, over the control. In the second phase, seed setts obtained from seed cane plants treated with the same rate gave sprouting performance of average quality. Significantly higher sprouting performance was recorded for seed setts from seed cane plants treated with N rates applied at mid and late crop ages. Therefore, to get higher sett yield of average quality it is advisable that urea be applied to seed cane plants of sugarcane variety B41/227 at the rate of 300kgN/ha in two splits of 200 and 100kgN/ha at two and half and five months of crop ages, respectively. Besides, as this study is the first by its kind under Finchaa condition, it paves an opportunity for further investigation including major sugarcane varieties under cultivation in the study site and other sugarcane plantations in the country. Index Terms- Fertilization, nitrogen, seed cane/sett, sett yield, sugarcane S I. INTRODUCTION ugarcane is propagated commercially by vegetative method, which involves the planting of the stem cuttings of immature cane about 8 to 12 months old, grown with special care are recommended for seed cane (Fauconnier, 1993). Herbert (1956) asserted that planting sound seed pieces with high germination capacity is very essential in order to maintain a uniform stand of sugarcane that ultimately produces high cane and sugar yield. Thus it is a point of due consideration that seed cane plants should receive high nitrogen (N) fertilization with balanced phosphorus (P) and potassium (K). According to Russell (1988) N occupies the highest place in the nutrition of sugarcane. N fertilization enhances and increases the growth of sugarcane and enables the plants to take up other nutrients (Barnes, 1974). Increasing the level of nitrogen to the optimum requirements of the seed cane plants correspondingly increases sett yield and quality (Herbert, 1956). Kakde (1985) also reported application of N as high dose 50% greater than that applied to the commercial cane. Various review reports (Humber, 1963; Clements, 1980) indicated that N fertilizer applications at two to six weeks before the cane is cut for seed is useful to improve germination, tillering and induce early vigour. The foregoing reviews at the formerly established sugarcane plantations of Wonji-Shoa and Metahara suggest that N fertilization of seed cane plants has a potential to improve yield and quality of setts, which in turn gives a foundation for good crop stand (Tadesse, 1993, 2004) whereas no research results are available on seed cane fertilization under Finchaa condition, which may differ from Wonji-Shoa and Metahara in fertility status and climatic conditions. At Finchaa Sugarcane Plantation the practices of seed cane fertilization is the same to the commercial cane fields despite the difference in the purpose of production. Usually, fields of light red chromic Luvisols have been allocated for seed cane production. Therefore, this study was initiated to investigate the influence of different N rates on growth, yield and quality of seed cane of sugarcane variety understudy. II. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was carried out at Finchaa, which is located at about 330km west of Addis Ababa. Its elevation is about 1350-1600m.a.s.l. with long years annual mean maximum and minimum temperatures of 30.6 and 14.5 0 C, respectively. Long years annual mean rainfall of the area is about 1310mm and mean maximum and minimum relative humidity is 83.8% and 38%, respectively. The experiment was conducted during 2000/2001 and 2002/20003 cropping years on sugarcane variety, B41/27. The study was classified into two experimental phases and repeated over two years on red chromic Luvisols. In phase-1, seed cane plants were fertilized with different N levels at three application times. In phase 2, quality of the setts obtained from the treated seed cane plants was tested. Phase-1 The experiment was laid in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Thirty two treatments comprised of four N levels: 0, 46, 92, and 138kgN/ha and applied at 2 1 / 2, 5 and 7 1 / 2 months after planting in single and split doses were used. The source of N is urea (46%N), which is the commonly used fertilizer in the plantation. Each plot consists of four furrows of each five meters long and a spacing of 1.45m. In

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 1, January 2013 2 each furrow 35 two-budded setts were planted at five centimeters overlap. Data were collected from the middle two furrows. Other cultural practices were executed according to the standard norms of the plantation. To determine soil physico-chemical properties of the study site, composite soil samples were collected from the two soil depths (0-30 and 30-60cm) before planting. The samples were analysed for texture, ph, organic C, total N, available P and K, CEC and EC following the procedures outlined in FAO (Cottenie, 1980) and IITA (1979) laboratory manuals. Growth and yield parameters were recorded at nine months of crop age to measure treatment effects. Plant height measurement of randomly selected 10 plants and stalk population count were done. Plant heights were measured from the ground level to the top visible dewlap (TVD). At cutting the plants for seed cane, final stalk population count was done. Ten randomly selected sample stalks per the middle two rows were collected and average stalk weight, stalk length and girth, number of internodes per stalk were recorded. Finally, estimated sett yield per hectare and juice quality parameters for reducing sugar were computed. Sett yield per hectare was calculated using the formula: Y = N-1)/2*P, where Y = number of two-budded setts/ha, N = number of internodes/stalk and P = stalk population/ha Phase-2 The influence of different N levels and time of application on the quality of seed material as measured by germination/sprouting was studied. Planting materials prepared from seed cane plants of phase-1 were planted in this phase. The samples were thoroughly mixed and then planting of the composite sample was executed. Field layout as well as arrangement and size of experimental plots were the same as in phase-1. At about 45 days after planting final sprouting count was conducted. In both cases, the collected data were subjected to combine analysis of variance (ANOVA) over years using the Mstat computer package. Treatment means that showed significant differences were separated by Duncan s Multiple Range Test (DMRT). III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Soil physico-chemical characteristics of the study site Results of soil analysis of the study site shows that low level of total N was observed at both top and sub-soil layers. Phase-1 Plant height/stalk elongation The results in Table 1 below indicated that plant height at nine months of crop age was not significantly affected by different N levels and time of application. Though, the lowest plant height was observed for the control.

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 1, January 2013 3 Table 1. Average plant height as affected by different N rates Trt. N Rate Time of Plant height at nine month of crop age No. (kgn/ha) Application (cm) T1 0-150.2 T2 46 2 1 / 2 199.8 T3 46 (23, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5 201.9 T4 46 5 186.6 T5 46 (23, 23) 5, 7 1 / 2 176.5 T6 46 (23, 23) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 186.6 T7 46 7 1 / 2 188.4 T8 46 2 1 / 2 206.8 T9 92 (46, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5 195.9 T10 92 5 204.6 T11 92 (46, 46) 5, 7 1 / 2 160.6 T12 92 (46, 46) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 174.2 T13 92 7 1 / 2 149.5 T14 138 2 1 / 2 212.5 T15 138 (69, 69) 2 1 / 2, 5 202.7 T16 138 5 219.9 T17 138 (69, 69) 5, 7 1 / 2 176.5 T18 138 (69, 69) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 205.0 T19 138 7 1 / 2 170.1 T20 138 (46, 46, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 199.1 T21 138 (46, 92) 5, 7 1 / 2 198.9 T22 138 (46, 92) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 199.8 T23 138 (92, 46) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 205.6 T24 138 (92, 46) 5, 7 1 / 2 197.9 T25 138 (46, 92) 2 1 / 2, 5 203.1 T26 138 (92, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5 202.3 T27 138 (69, 46, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 209.4 T28 138 (69, 23, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 213.4 T29 138 (46, 69, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 211.1 T30 138 (46, 69, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 217.5 T31 138 (23, 69, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 202.5 T32 138 (23, 69, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 185.9 CV (%) 11.7 Stalk characteristics at harvest Average stalk population, length and girth, and number of internodes per stalk are presented in Table 2. Statistically significant differences between treatments were observed for stalk population and length (P<0.01). Significantly higher stalk population (144 793) was recorded for high N rate, i.e., 138kg N\ha (T26) and increased stalk population by 39.1% over the control (104 096) but with no significant differences from most the treatments. Regarding stalk length, significantly higher stalk lengths of 161.4 to 168.7cm were recorded for T 14, T 18, T 20, T 26, T 27 and T 28 against control (125.cm). On the other hand, variations among stalk girth and number of internodes per stalk were not significant for different N rates studied. From the quantitative aspect of seed cane production, except stalk population and number of internodes, other parameters such as stalk length and girth do not affect sett yield but may have influence on setts quality. Research findings conducted in Egypt also revealed that increasing nitrogen level increased stalk height, stalk diameter and quality of setts/seed cane as compared with the lowest rate (Azzay et al, 2008).

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 1, January 2013 4 Table 2. Stalk population, stalk length, stalk girth and number of internodes/stalk as affected by different N rates at harvest (at nine months of crop age) Trt. N Rate Time of Stalk population Stalk length Stalk girth Average no. of No. (kgn/ha) Application per ha* (cm)* (mm) internodes/stalk T1 0-104 096 fg 125.5 e 25.0 12.7 T2 46 2 1 / 2 128 830 abcdefg 153.8 abcde 25.2 13.0 T3 46 (23, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5 116 689 abcdefg 140.2 abcde 26.3 13.3 T4 46 5 120 736 abcdefg 146.0 abcde 25.9 13.3 T5 46 (23, 23) 5, 7 1 / 2 107 246 defg 132.4 cde 27.0 12.3 T6 46 (23, 23) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 105 222 efg 134.5 bcde 26.1 13.0 T7 46 7 1 / 2 101 175 g 134.9 bcde 27.4 14.0 T8 46 2 1 / 2 126 354 abcdefg 152.1 abcde 27.6 13.3 T9 92 (46, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5 118 936 abcdefg 155.3 abcde 27.0 13.0 T10 92 5 126 354 abcdefg 151.0 abcde 26.9 13.3 T11 92 (46, 46) 5, 7 1 / 2 114 665 bcdefg 146.6 abcde 27.6 13.7 T12 92 (46, 46) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 110 168 bcdefg 151.8 abcde 25.2 13.7 T13 92 7 1 / 2 110 841 bcdefg 139.6 abcde 27.1 13.0 T14 138 2 1 / 2 132 877 abcde 161.4 abcd 25.8 12.7 T15 138 (69, 69) 2 1 / 2, 5 117 588 abcdefg 156.7 abcde 26.7 14.0 T16 138 5 108 819 defg 137.0 abcde 26.9 13.0 T17 138 (69, 69) 5, 7 1 / 2 109 044 defg 129.3 de 25.9 13.3 T18 138 (69, 69) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 131 304 abcdefg 164.4 abc 26.2 14.0 T19 138 7 1 / 2 106 571 defg 136.4 abcde 26.3 13.0 T20 138 (46, 46, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 133 326 abcde 164.1 abc 26.7 14.0 T21 138 (46, 92) 5, 7 1 / 2 133 776 abcde 147.2 abcde 27.2 13.0 T22 138 (46, 92) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 121 410 abcdefg 156.9 abcde 26.4 13.0 T23 138 (92, 46) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 120 736 abcdefg 154.8 abcde 26.3 13.0 T24 138 (92, 46) 5, 7 1 / 2 115 115 abcdefg 137.7 abcde 25.6 13.0 T25 138 (46, 92) 2 1 / 2, 5 140 070 ab 154.7 abcde 26.0 13.0 T26 138 (92, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5 144 793 a 166.7 ab 26.1 12.7 T27 138 (69, 46, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 127 930 abcdefg 163.2 abc 26.3 13.3 T28 138 (69, 23, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 134 450 abcd 168.7 a 26.2 13.3 T29 138 (46, 69, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 138 947 abc 142.9 abcde 26.4 12.7 T30 138 (46, 69, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 119 387 abcdefg 153.3 abcde 25.9 12.7 T31 138 (23, 69, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 111 068 cdefg 150.2 abcde 27.6 13.7 T32 138 (23, 69, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 110 393 defg 146.5 abcde 26.4 13.0 CV(%) 8.97 8.43 4.05 7.0 * - Means followed by different letters within the same column are significantly different at 1% probability level. Sett yield Data in Table 3 shows significant differences between treatments (P<0.01) for sett yield. Significantly higher sett yield was obtained for T 14, T 18, T 25, T 26 and T 28, i.e., for the higher rate of 138kg N/ha in whole and split doses as compared to other treatments but with no difference among them. However, the highest and lowest sett yield 868 758 and 572 528 were recorded for T26 and the control respectively. N rate of 138kg N/ha in two doses (92 and 46) applied at 2 1 / 2 and 5 months, respectively, had shown sett yield advantage and increased sett yield by 51.7% over the control as compared with the rest treatments. Moreover, the result of this study also supports earlier observations (Tadesse, 1993, 2004) that N fertilization of seed cane plants has a potential to improve yield and quality of setts, which in turn gives a foundation for good crop stand.

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 1, January 2013 5 Table 3. Sett yield as affected by different N rates Treatment N Rate Time of Estimated number of No. (kgn/ha) Application two-budded setts per ha* T1 0-572 528 c T2 46 2 1 / 2 772 980 bc T3 46 (23, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5 700 134 bc T4 46 5 724 416 bc T5 46 (23, 23) 5, 7 1 / 2 589 853 c T6 46 (23, 23) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 631 332 bc T7 46 7 1 / 2 657 637 bc T8 46 2 1 / 2 758 638 bc T9 92 (46, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5 713 616 bc T10 92 5 758 124 bc T11 92 (46, 46) 5, 7 1 / 2 745 323 bc T12 92 (46, 46) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 716 092 bc T13 92 7 1 / 2 665 046 bc T14 138 2 1 / 2 797 262 ab T15 138 (69, 69) 2 1 / 2, 5 764 322 bc T16 138 5 652 914 bc T17 138 (69, 69) 5, 7 1 / 2 654 264 bc T18 138 (69, 69) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 853 470 ab T19 138 7 1 / 2 639 426 bc T20 138 (46, 46, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 733 293 bc T21 138 (46, 92) 5, 7 1 / 2 735 768 bc T22 138 (46, 92) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 728 460 bc T23 138 (92, 46) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 724 416 bc T24 138 (92, 46) 5, 7 1 / 2 690 690 bc T25 138 (46, 92) 2 1 / 2, 5 840 420 ab T26 138 (92, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5 868 758 a T27 138 (69, 46, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 767 580 bc T28 138 (69, 23, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 806 700 ab T29 138 (46, 69, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 833 682 bc T30 138 (46, 69, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 716 322 bc T31 138 (23, 69, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 721 942 bc T32 138 (23, 69, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 662 358 bc CV (%) 15.76 * - Means followed by different letters within the same column are significantly different at 1% probability level. Phase-2 Sprouting/germination percentage Sprouting percentages were remarkably different among treatment and varies between 47.1% and 80.7%. The highest sprouting percentages were recorded for T 11 (80.7%) and T19 (80.0%), i.e., plants grown from seed cane plants treated with application of 92kg N/ha in two equal split doses at five, and seven and half months, and single application of 138kg N/ha applied at seven and half month, respectively. The lowest sprouting percentage was recorded for T14 single application of 138kg N/ha at early crop age (two and half month); in view of the fact that N applied at early growing stage, regardless of the rate, it could be utilized for vegetative growth and may have not been enough to produce reserve nutrients for the sprouting buds as compared to late application. Figures presented in Table 5 revealed that significantly higher sprouting percentages (P<0.01) were recorded for T11 and T19 and improved shoot emergence by 39.5 and 38.3%, respectively, over the control. On the contrary, no significant difference between the rest treatments and the control was observed. Similarly, Tadesse (2004) reported high sprouting percentage with nitrogen level increased as compared with the lowest rate (the control). This is possibly due to the fact that single or double application of high rate of N fertilizer at middle and late ages have made the applied N available for the sprouting buds to be easily utilized for emergence.

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 1, January 2013 6 Table 4. Average plant height as affected by different N rates Trt. N Rate Time of No. (kgn/ha) Application Sprouting/germination %age* T1 0-57.8 bcd T2 46 2 1 / 2 62.6 abcd T3 46 (23, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5 64.5 abcd T4 46 5 59.8 bcd T5 46 (23, 23) 5, 7 1 / 2 68.1 abc T6 46 (23, 23) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 69.1 abc T7 46 7 1 / 2 72.9 abc TT8 46 2 1 / 2 70.7 abc T9 92 (46, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5 64.5 abcd T10 92 5 77.1 ab T11 92 (46, 46) 5, 7 1 / 2 80.7 a T12 92 (46, 46) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 68.8 abc T13 92 7 1 / 2 73.8 abc T14 138 2 1 / 2 47.1 d T15 138 (69, 69) 2 1 / 2, 5 54.5 cd T16 138 5 77.1 ab T17 138 (69, 69) 5, 7 1 / 2 71.2 abc T18 138 (69, 69) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 58.1 bcd T19 138 7 1 / 2 80.0 a T20 138 (46, 46, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 61.4 abcd T21 138 (46, 92) 5, 7 1 / 2 76.7 ab T22 138 (46, 92) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 65.2 abcd T23 138 (92, 46) 2 1 / 2, 7 1 / 2 59.3 bcd T24 138 (92, 46) 5, 7 1 / 2 73.6 abc T25 138 (46, 92) 2 1 / 2, 5 68.3 abc T26 138 (92, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5 63.1 abcd T27 138 (69, 46, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 58.8 bcd T28 138 (69, 23, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 59.3 bcd T29 138 (46, 69, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 67.1 abc T30 138 (46, 69, 23) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 64.5 abcd T31 138 (23, 69, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 72.8 abc T32 138 (23, 69, 46) 2 1 / 2, 5, 7 1 / 2 77.1 ab CV (%) 10.9 * - Means followed by different letters within the same column are significantly different at 1% probability level. IV. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS In this study, it was found that effects of different N rates were noted to be reflected both on sett yield and quality parameter. Application of 138kg N/ha (300 kg urea/ha) in two doses of 92 and 46kg N/ha at two and half and five months, respectively, resulted in good growth, population, stalk length as well as higher sett yield in phase-1. In phase-2, however, per cent of shoot emergence of seed setts treated with this rate gave seed cane of average quality with no significant difference from that of zero N level and the rest treatments. This is possibly due to the fact that applications of adequate amount of N fertilizer at early and middle growth stages enhanced better vegetative growth as compared to late applications but may not have been enough to produce seed setts of higher quality. Therefore, adequate applications of N fertilizer at early and middle crop ages resulted in higher sett yield and ultimately seed cane of average quality. Accordingly, based on the results obtained and out of it, the following recommendations are forwarded: Biological yield of sugarcane for seed production required more N than what is being applied to attain its maximum. Hence, to get higher sett yield and ultimately seed cane of average quality it is recommended that Urea be applied to seed cane plants of sugarcane variety under study at the rate of 300kh/ha in two doses of 200 and 100kg/ha at two and half and five months after planting, respectively. Hence, as this study is the first by its kind under Finchaa condition, it paves a way for further investigation including major sugarcane varieties under cultivation in the study site and other sugarcane plantations in the country.

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 1, January 2013 7 REFERENCES [1] Azzay, N.B., Elham, A.D., Effect of nitrogen fertilization on yield and quality of two sugarcane promising varieties. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 2000. Vol.78 No. 2 pp. 745-758. [2] Barnes, A.C., 1974, 76. The sugarcane. Leonard Hill Books, London. [3] Cottenie, A., 1980. Soil and plant testing as a basis of fertilizer recommendation, FAO Soils Bulletin, 38:61-100. [4] Fauconnier, R., 1993. Sugarcane. The Tropical Agriculturalist. The MACMILLAN Press Ltd. London. [5] Hebert L.P., 1956. Effect of seed pieces and rate of planting on yield of sugarcane, and of N fertilization on yield of seed cane in Louisiana. Proc. IX Congr. ISSCT. 1:301-310. [6] Humbert, P.R., 1963. Planting of sugarcane. Elsevier Pub. Comp. Amesterdam. [7] International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), 1979. Selected methods for soil and plant analysis, Ibadan, Nigeria. [8] Kakde, J.R., 1985. Sugarcane Production. Renu Printers, New Delhi. [9] Tadess Negi, 1993. The effect of rate and time of application on growth parameters and quality of setts of seed cane plants of sugarcane at Wonji- Shoa. M.Sc. Thesis. Alemaya University of Agriculture, Alemaya, Ethiopia. [10] Tadess Negi, 2008. Effect of N application on seed cane yield and quality. Research report (Unpublished). Ethiopian Sugar Industry Support Centre Sh. Co., Research and Training Service, Wonji, Ethiopia. [11] Russell E.W., 1988. Soil condition and plant growth. English Language Book Sciety. Longman London.