Roche Position 1 on Respecting Human Rights

Similar documents
The Business Principles of Alfa Laval

SABMiller Human Rights Policy

UN Global Compact Communication on Progress 2017 EG

Code of Conduct. Myanmar Garment Manufacturers Association

GROUP HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY

Groupe PSA Responsible Purchasing Policy

Responsible Procurement policy

Quality, trust and social commitment. CaixaBank's Human Rights Policy. May 2017

Annual Labour and Social Policy Review: The Corporate Responsibility to Respect: A Human Rights Milestone

UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL COMPACT

Sustainability Principles Preamble

UN Global Compact Communication on Progress

Ethical Procurement Code

Gilat Telecom Communication on Progress

Vice Mayor decision: 3/2012 Our reference:

ALTRON POLICY MANUAL

Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement 2016

Metso Code of Conduct

Our Approach to Social Compliance. Application of this Code. Special provisions for traders, agents and intermediaries. June 2016

Business Partner Code of Conduct

Anti-Slavery & Human Trafficking Report

We continue to commit to share this information with our stakeholders as part of our annual CSR report.

Business Principles. Business Principles

MAKING HEADWAY IN EUROPE

We continue to commit to share this information with our stakeholders as part of our annual CSR report.

Scania Supplier Code of Conduct

Partnering with Suppliers. Diageo s Standards of Business Ethics and Sustainability for Suppliers

Acting for responsible sourcing in our supply chain Code of Business Conduct for Suppliers

Linking G4 and the UN Guiding Principles

Singtel/Optus Group Supplier Code of Conduct (SCC)

QCC Global Ltd. United Nations Global Compact. Communications on Progress. From May 2016 to May QCC Keeping your business, your business

MODERN SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING STATEMENT 2017

Astral Poly Technik Limited. Business Responsibility Policies

Tech Mahindra Business Responsibility Policy

Corporate Responsibility Policy

Social & Ethics Committee UNCOVERED

ELECTROLUX WORKPLACE CODE OF CONDUCT

Shaping Corporate Responsibility for a Connected World. Supplement to 2014 Annual Corporate Responsibility Report

THE MODERN SLAVERY ACT 2015 TRANSPARENCY STATEMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING 31 MARCH 2017

GLOBAL COMPACT ANNUAL COMMUNICATION ON PROGRESS 2012

HUGO BOSS Social Standards

Foreword. 1. Implementation Procedure. 2. Working Hours, Wages and Vacation Entitlement. 3. Discrimination. 4. Child Labor and Forced Labor

The Atlas Copco Group BUSINESS CODE OF PRACTICE

Securitas Values and Ethics

Securitas Values and Ethics

Ratos AB Adopted by Ratos s Board on February 2018 (replaces previous version adopted 16 February 2017)

Respecting human rights. Respect is one of BP s values, and guides how we interact with all those who come into contact with our operations.

We are currently examining how we can schedule the frequency of this audit process in the future, based on the level of supplier risk.

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR THE PRINCIPLES ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND PRIVACY

COMMUNICATION ON PROGRESS 2011

Corporate Social Responsibility Policy

Corporate Responsibility at Lundin Petroleum

Key Elements Procedure 6 Corporate Social Responsibility

Compass Group s Code of Ethics

France Telecom Orange Group Sourcing & Supply Chain

Supplier Code of Conduct

PYEI SONE HEIN COMPANY LIMITED. United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) Communication on Progress

Checking up on labour rights. A basic assessment tool for the labour policies and practices of international companies. Written by Sarah Rennie

G L O B A L C O M PA C T C O M M U N I C AT I O N ON PROGRESS

Supplier Code of Conduct

Supplier Code of Conduct

TELUS Supplier Code of Conduct

Business Responsibility Policy

Procedure: Sasol Supplier code Of Ethics

company what does that mean?

Verisk Analytics Supplier Code of Conduct

A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR STORA ENSO S SUPPLIERS. June 2015

amfori BSCI Code of Conduct 1

CAPITA PLC POLICY PREVENTION OF MODERN SLAVERY STATEMENT PUBLIC. Classification Version 1

Abcam distributor code of conduct

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) from the point of view of scienceindustries

CODE OF CONDUCT. Document Management

Code of Business Conduct

The purpose of the Committee is to ensure positive impact of the group s activities on its many stakeholders including 1.

Appendix 5. Social responsibility

Modern slavery and human trafficking statement

As if you were not confused enough already?

SHELL PENSIONS TRUST LIMITED RESPONSIBLE OWNERSHIP POLICY & PROCESSES

MODERN SLAVERY ACT TRANSPARENCY STATEMENT2018

Supplier Code of Conduct

Atlas Copco annual report GRI Index 2017

Apple Supplier Code of Conduct

MODERN SLAVERY AND THE SUPPLY CHAIN

Communication on Progress

The EU competence and duty to regulate corporate responsibility to respect Human Rights through mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights Galp Energia 2017 Annual Report

Communication on Progress United Nations Global Compact October 2017

Safety Integrity Excellence People and Citizenship

United Nations Global Compact Communication on Progress 2015

Business Responsibility Policy

Contents. 3 Introduction. 5 Our values 6 Safety 7 Teamwork 8 Respect 9 Integrity 10 Excellence

Terms of Reference of the Social, Ethics and Transformation Committee

BUSINESS RESPONSIBILITY POLICY

Code of Conduct Policy

SABMiller Supplier Code of Conduct. Living Sustainable Procurement September Applicable to all SABMiller Procurement Suppliers

Securitas Values and Ethics Code

ETHICAL RISK INDEX. A report into the factors which affect ethical sourcing in the stone industry. WHITE PAPER

LTES CODE OF CONDUCT

Unilever. Responsible Sourcing Policy. Working in partnership with our suppliers

RB s Policy on Human Rights and Responsible Business* - Detailed Requirements

Transcription:

Roche Position 1 on Respecting Human Rights Background The debate concerning the responsibilities of business in relation to human rights surfaced prominently in the 1990s and has remained in the headlines. At that time oil, gas, and mining companies in particular proceeded to expand into challenging areas. Later, consumer goods sectors like clothing, fashion, luxury goods etc. also expanded and soon began to draw public attention to the poor working conditions in their global supply chains. At present, virtually all business sectors are concerned, including healthcare. In response to these developments, Harvard Professor John Ruggie developed a framework which consists of three pillars Protect, Respect, Remedy. To protect is the duty of the states, to respect is the corporate responsibility of businesses and remedy is both a shared duty of states and corporations to maintain grievance mechanisms. The Ruggie Framework was approved by the UN Human Rights Council in 2011 by adopting the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) and has received wide support from politicians, business and society. As a result, countries have issued a National Action Plan in order to nationally implement the UNGPs. In 2015, the UN issued the Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs), which are closely linked to the Human Rights. Stakeholders Expectations and Concerns A variety of stakeholders, such as NGOs, Social Responsible Investors, Corporate Responsibility Rating agencies, employees and the public at large, are concerned about the protection of human rights, especially in countries with immature public institutions or where the law is either weak or not properly enforced. The public will not accept that businesses profits are enabled by violations of fundamental human rights. Rather, the expectations are that businesses will maintain and apply the same high standards across the board, wherever they operate. Multinational companies are expected to assume a duty to engage in careful due diligence on actual and potential business partners and to ask these to do the same with their own business partners in order to create transparency throughout the whole supply chain. In addition, businesses are expected to become pro-active and make an active contribution to improve the situation, before the implementation of legal frameworks and beyond their legal boundaries. In the sphere of human rights, this would crystallize into 1 Pertains to SDG 16 1

three dimensions: (i) doing no harm, (ii) making an impactful contribution and (iii) looking at the sphere of influence. Doing no harm Businesses are expected to have adequate measures (policies, processes, monitoring and transparent reporting systems) in place to protect human rights within their own operations as well as in the interaction with business partners. Making an impactful contribution Businesses are expected to become pro-active and make voluntary contributions to the protection of human rights which go beyond legal boundaries and compliance regulations. Looking at the sphere of influence The concept of the sphere of influence was introduced in the context of the 10 principles of the UN Global Compact and has been widely used and referenced ever since. The Ruggie Framework reflects these expectations and perceptions. It has created principles, which go beyond a pure compliance exercise or the definition of a rule-based level playing field. Instead, it creates an open system, which drives an active and continuous improvement. Roche Position Human Rights ensure that people have a right to be treated with dignity. By applying the principle of knowing and showing Roche is committed to avoid adverse impacts on human rights by focusing on the perspective of the rights holder. While assessing the impact on the people, we strive to avoid negative impacts on Human Rights regardless whether they were directly caused, contributed or are linked to our business. Roche fully supports and implements the Protect, Respect, Remedy approach with regards to human rights as stipulated by the Ruggie Framework. Roche is equally committed to support the UN Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) within the sphere of our business strategy, the 10 UN Global Compact Principles, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the fundamental Labour Rights as stipulated by the International Labour Organization s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Ideally the Ruggie Framework will deliver a safe harbour for businesses to operate in. Roche prefers such an open approach, which will deliver continuous improvement over a normative approach. Roche aims at establishing and maintaining best practice at the policy level, in management approaches, as well as in implementing the corporate responsibilities of Remedy. Specifically, Roche will address the following approach: Policy We support and respect human rights as an integral part of our corporate strategy. This commitment is reflected in our Roche Group Code of Conduct, Supplier Code of Conduct, 2

the Roche Employment Policy and the Roche Policy on Safety, Security, Health and Environmental Protection, all being embedded throughout the Roche Group. Due Diligence Based on an impact assessment of our operations and through business relationships, we integrate findings into our internal business functions and take the appropriate action. We review and monitor progress internally and report externally, such as on our website and in our Annual Report. A cross-divisional working group has established a checklist on Due Diligence for External Business Partners, mainly focusing on agents and distributors. It includes guidance regarding a risk assessment, including a Human Rights Assessment and Implementation Framework. Remediation We maintain and improve operational-level grievance mechanisms, which we understand to encompass also a preventive function. The Chief Compliance Officer serves as a key contact person for employees, shareholders, customers, business partners and the general public on issues relating to the implementation of and compliance with our Roche Group Code of Conduct. In addition, we request appropriate remedial measures whenever we are confronted with a violation of human rights. The basics of the Roche grievance mechanisms are communicated internally and externally. Our Engagement Roche is fully committed to supporting and respecting human rights within its sphere of our business strategy and to ensuring that Roche is not complicit in any human rights abuses. This encompasses all internationally acknowledged human rights, such as for example labour rights, freedom of association and privacy rights. The collaboration with society organisations, government bodies and international organisations is essential to identify areas of concerns, and enables Roche have a positive impact on human rights in general. As part of our comprehensive Compliance Management System, we have adopted a policy on safety, security, health and environment of our employees. Similarly, Roche is committed to uphold the freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right of collective bargaining, the elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labour (including all forms of slavery), the effective abolition of child labour, and the elimination of discrimination in respect of employment. It is Roche s policy to ensure that the behavior of its employees does not discriminate anyone on the grounds of gender, age, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, sexual orientation, HIV/AIDS infection, citizenship or any other relevant category. We have implemented corresponding measures to ensure that we do no harm. Externally, we request our suppliers to adhere to the Roche Supplier Code of Conduct, which also includes a strong commitment to human rights. We conduct sustainability assurance visits at our business critical suppliers with the support of external audit firms, in order to ensure that 3

our suppliers meet our expectations for human rights and other sustainability principles. We work with our suppliers to follow up on findings from these visits. In addition, our Group Legal Department has elaborated an assurance declaration on the adequate application of Roche s Anti-Corruption Compliance Questionnaire for Business Partners which includes due diligence obligations, as well as integrity clauses addressing the respect of human rights. Our challenge is to focus our efforts where we see the biggest risks and the biggest levers for remediation and improvement. On a global level, we are systematically identifying human rights and identify vulnerable groups, which could be negatively impacted by our businesses. The human rights issues are prioritized in order to address them properly. We maintain a system of consistent global standards, which we also apply to our business partners, for example, in areas like R&D, clinical trials, manufacturing and distribution. We are in the process to evaluate and establish a similar process on local and regional level. A cross-functional Human Rights Task Force was established in 2017 which elaborated tools and processes to identify and mitigate human rights risks (with focus on modern slavery) in our supply chain. By assessing our business critical suppliers, a scalable Human Rights risk algorithm and a risk heat map were put in place. This methodology provided the necessary transparency among the higher tiers of the supply chain. We globally implemented and apply a systematic risk management approach for both our own business critical suppliers and the critical non-tier 1 suppliers. As we strive for long-lasting relationship with our suppliers, we engage with them in the dialogue and elaborate mitigation plans for any identified high risks. Further, we collaborate with peers and suppliers to our industry in the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Initiative (PSCI) to make a positive impact on Human Rights and increase supplier standards. The topic of human rights is a standard item of the Group s governing body for sustainability matters, the Corporate Sustainability Committee (CSC), with a view to execute oversight over the implementation of our approach, as well as potential improvements, in order to remain at the best practice level. Our efforts are not least recognized by the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) which covers human rights, rights at work, and also specifically the Ruggie Framework. We are committed to report continuously internally and externally with concrete examples on how we support the Ruggie Framework, both at the Group headquarter level as well as at the level of our affiliates. We are convinced that stakeholders expectations on the implementation of the UNGPs and the Ruggie Framework will continue to increase and will result in further requests on evolving topics, not yet fully identified. It is therefore critical for Roche s success going forward, to identify these trends early on, assess them and develop adequate positions, answers and solutions. For issues deemed material, Roche will continue to engage and support the development of reasonable and balanced approaches. 4

More information http://www.roche.com/sustainability/what_we_do/for_employees/human_rights.htm https://www.roche.com/sustainability/suppliers.htm Contact Urs Jaisli, Chief Compliance Officer, +41 (0) 61 688 4018, urs.jaisli@roche.com This Position was elaborated by the Corporate Sustainability Committee and adopted by the Corporate Executive Committee on December 2012. It was reviewed in May 2018. 5