Wetland versus Stream Macroinvertebrates

Similar documents
Missing Macroinvertebrates. Missing Macroinvertebrates

Benthic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring

Benthic Macroinvertebrates (BMI) Identification

POLLUTION TOLERANCE INDEX (PTI)

How Sensitive Are They?

CRUM / RIDLEY / CHESTER Volunteer Monitoring Program Core monitors data sheet (version 7/99)

Land Use Activities Potential Pollution Problems. Land Disposal septic system bacteria, nitrate, phosphate

Macroinvertebrate Investigation

A Local Ecosystem. Year 11 Biology. The Wetlands Centre. The Wetlands Environmental Education Centre

Our Watershed. 5-mile Creek. Natural Features: Wetlands, small bodies of water, and Forested areas

Summary. calculated. ebrates they have identified. to the. entire life crayfish. the type of. mayflies, tolerant to. common in.

Macro Invertebrates STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES

River of Ashe County, NC

Pollution Tolerance Index Bag of Bugs

Water Wonders. Purpose. Materials. Overview. Student Outcomes. Time. Level. Part 1: Part 2: Part 3 (optional):

Stream Observation Data Sheet School CMS Date 12/16/2015 Stream Study Site Mingo Creek. Macroinvertebrate Survey

Wood-Pawcatuck Watershed Association 2002 Aquatic Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling Project

Stream Observation Data Sheet School: Charleroi Middle School Date 9/24/15 Stream Study Site: Maple Creek. Macroinvertebrate Survey

Bugs Don t Bug Me Lessons plans and hands-on activities about aquatic macroinvertebrates and water quality for K-6 students

POND MUCKING Environmental Education Lesson Plan Edwards Camp and Conference Center

Water facts 2. Water quality and macroinvertebrates 2 ND EDITION

Trout Are Made of Trees: How Are Leaves Important to Streams?

Macroinvertebrates What Wetland Bugs Can Teach Us

Aquatic Ecology Field Study Procedures

Benthic Macroinvertebrates and MS4

The development of the Big Pond Dip invertebrate survey method

A study of the benthic macroinvertebrate composition of the Kings River and its major tributaries to determine the water quality of the catchment.

Fact Sheet. Community-Led Water Quality Monitoring Framework for Lake Bosomtwe

Watershed Investigations: How to Assess the Health of a Stream

Water Quality and Macroinvertebrates By Teresa Matteson and Heath Keirstead Benton Soil & Water Conservation District

Benthic Macroinvertebrate Study

STREAM ECOLOGY IN AN URBANIZED LANDSCAPE

Riffle Beetles to Riparian Buffers

North Fork Watershed Project Brook Trout Habitat Study. 9 September 2010

Ecological Energetics in a Freshwater Community. (WJEC A2) Discover Ltd. Timbers, Oxted Road, Godstone, Surrey. RH9 8AD

Life at the Surface. Adapted from: Life at the Surface and A Tense Place to Live? in Living in Water. National Aquarium in Baltimore, 1997.

Water Quality Indicators: Biological, Chemical & Physical Parameters

Microhabitats #1: Quantitative Study of Microhabitats

Processing Aquatic Invertebrates


Croudace Bay Wetlands Education Kit

Lab 8. Stream Ecology Using ANOVA

Aquatic Macroinvertebrates and Stream Ecology

Macroinvertebrates as bioindicators

Web of Life. The energy starts with the sun. Light energy is captured and transformed into chemical energy

Micro Odyssey Phytoplankton, Zooplankton

Aquatic Insect Lab Practical

National Aquatic Monitoring Center (NAMC): Protocol for the Collection of Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Samples

ENVIROTHON AQUATICS SAMPLE TEST

LIVING WATER. Eno River State Park An Environmental Education Learning Experience. Designed for the Middle Grades

Current Speed. Procedure. Conclusion. Local Aquatic Field Study WATERS W AROUND THE WORLD

Study of a Freshwater Stream Ecosystem

Bugs, Brook Trout, and Water Quality: How Are They Connected?

Rainpools of the rangelands: hidden diversity and episodic production

ADAPTATION TO HABITATS. Lecture Objectives. Introduction

Activity 1: Using the Level of Oxygen- Saturation Chart graph Dissolved Oxygen vs. Temperature at 100% saturation. Start by making a 2 column table.

Eau Galle River - Cth D R.Mi-13.0, Eau Galle River. Latitude: , Longitude: Jo Van. Reporting Period: 01/01/2016 to 12/31/2016

Photo tour of the monitoring activities found in the Stream Side Science manual

Stream Ecology. Physical Characteristics

Astudy of the Macrobenthos of the Eulittoral Zone of otsego Lake

Unit II: Wetland Ecology

Water Quality: The Basics

Macroinvertebrates and water quality: a teaching guide. CBER Contract Report Number 18. Prepared for the Biotin teachers' evening. Dr Brendan J.

SAMPLING YOUR ESTUARY Level IIB WHAT S IN THE WATER?

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE for the BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE LABORATORY

5 th Grade Holifield Field Guide 2017

Junior High Version. Version 6

Metals in the Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Coal Creek, Crested Butte, CO

Transparency A Water Clarity Measure

Investigating the Effects of Treated Domestic Sewage on a Freshwater Ecosystem.

Pennsylvania DEP Multihabitat Stream Assessment Protocol

Invertebrate differentiation in various microhabitats of small and medium lowland rivers

Biodiversity Debate. To evaluate the biological, aesthetic, ethical, social and economic arguments with regard to maintaining biodiversity.

ADOPT-A-RIVER INITIATIVE

The ALT Method (Agreed Level

Biodiversity Study Field Trip

Assessment of mosquito larvicide impacts on aquatic invertebrates in the Vasse-Wonnerup Wetland System Report to the City of Busselton

Sibun River Water Quality. Monitoring Project

Appendices. Support Documents. The following documents are available in the Support Documents component of the SCEI Web Site

Macroinvertebrate survey and biological assessment of water quality: tributaries of Canadarago Lake; Otsego County, NY 1

WEEKS 8 AND 9: FRESHWATER ECOLOGY

Aquatic macroinvertebrate richness, abundance and distribution in the Nee Soon freshwater swamp forest, Singapore

Missouri Streams. Fact Sheet. What factors affect stream habitat? Stream Habitat Affects Aquatic Communities

Aquatic Life. Concepts: Objectives: Activities in Lesson: Equipment: Vocabulary. Note to Teacher: Time: 1 hour, 50 minutes

A SCORING SYSTEM FOR MACRO-INVERTEBRATES ( WATER BUGS ) IN AUSTRALIAN RIVERS

THE ECOLOGY OF PONDS AND LAKES. Abiotic Factors Affecting Ponds and Lakes

Square Point Shovel Rakes and Hoes Garden Rake Leaf Rake Garden Hoe

Southern Nevada Regional Professional Development Program. Mealworm Observations

Water Quality Temperature

Water Quality. Overview of Water Quality

A Day in the Life of the Buffalo River Teacher Information Packet

Foreword. A Letter from the Secretary of Environmental Protection

AP Environmental Science

CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING IN THE MUSKOKA WATERSHED

Contra Costa Monitoring and Assessment Program

Learning Area Goal # Standard Level and Benchmark Science A B E A B

The Effects of Pollution Reduction on a Wild Trout Stream. Baseline Studies Report: 2005

Lesson 2-2: Riparian Zones

Food Web Invaders TEACHER LESSON PLAN BACKGROUND INTRODUCTION MATERIALS NEEDED LEARNING OBJECTIVES VOCABULARY. Length minutes

Water Pollution: Sediment

Transcription:

Wetland versus Stream Macroinvertebrates Purpose: Summary: To investigate various biomes through observation and comparison of the diversity of life, in particular, the specific number of species, biomass, and type of organisms. In this exercise, students will use their data from the activity Who Lives in the Water? or Missing Macroinvertebrates and compare it to a macroinvertebrate sample collected from a wetland site. Duration: Classroom 20 minutes Outdoors 2 sessions, 40 min. each Setting: Classroom Outdoors Background: For background information, see: The Macroinvertebrate section of the Utah Stream Team Manual which defines a macroinvertebrate and discusses how macroinvertebrate populations change due to natural and human influences, why macroinvertebrates are important in aquatic ecosystems, how to collect a sample and how to interpret the results. The activity Who Lives in the Water? or Missing Macroinvertebrates. Materials: Kick nets* plastic pan* Waders Transfer pipettes* Clipboard Plastic petri dishes* Pencils Magnifying glasses* Copies of macroinvertebrate keys Copies of student worksheet Copies of macroinvertebrate sampling instructions Data from activity Who Lives in the Water? or Missing Macroinvertebrates * For information on equipment for loan or Bucket for purchase, contact USU Water Quality Extension at (435) 797-2580 or www.extension.usu.edu/waterquality 61

Wetland versus Stream Macroinvertebrates Classroom Activity: 1. Ask the students to list differences between a stream biome and a wetland biome (e.g., water velocity, temperature, depth, width, vegetation, sediment, inhabitants). Tell them that for this activity they will compare the diversity of macroinvertebrates found in a stream to those found in a wetland. 2. Explain to the students that they will be using their data from the activity Who Lives in the Water? to compare with the new data they collect from a wetland biome. 3. Ask the students about the differences they expect to see in the macroinvertebrates from the two types of biomes. Why would there be differences? 4. Be sure the students are familiar with the macroinvertebrate keys they will be using in the field and also the sampling procedures. If you would like a larger, laminated version of the key provided, please contact USU Water Quality Extension at (435) 797-2580. Field Activity: 1. Set up stations for sampling macroinvertebrates. These areas should be easily accessible and safe to enter. Each station should include: Wetland sampling instruction sheets (it helps to laminate these!) Waders Kick net Plastic pan Safety First! Always consider safety factors when Transfer pipettes working near water. Magnifying glasses Petri dishes Macroinvertebrate keys 62 2. Divide the students into groups. The groups should be made up of no more than six students to be sure everyone gets to

Mayfly nymph Caddisfly larva Dragonfly nymph Damselfly nymph Blackfly larva Cranefly larva Scuds Leeches Midge larva Beetle larva Snails Aquatic worms Water boatmen Water strider Mosquito larva Wetland versus Stream Macroinvertebrates participate. Provide each group with clipboards, pencils, and worksheets. Each group will sample at a different station. 3. Have the students follow the instructions for sampling macroinvertebrates on the macroinvertebrate sampling sheet, and record the information on the macroinvertebrate sorting worksheet. ACTIVITY EXTENSIONS: Research factors that would contribute to a decline in the diversity of macroinvertebrates (refer to the activity What s in the Water and/or see the activity Missing Macroinvertebrates). Applying the Data: Use the following suggestions to have the students compare their data. 1. Have the students graph the number of each species or types found at each site. Are there entire groups present at one site, but missing at another? 2. Have the students graph the number of individuals found at each site. See example below. 3. Have the students estimate the biomass (organisms per unit area) at each site. Macroinvertebrate Diversity # found at each site 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Site 1 Site 2 63

Wetland versus Stream Macroinvertebrates Further Discussion: 1. Were there some types of organisms found in both biomes and other types of organisms not found in one or the other? The most obvious difference in large macroinvertebrates in a wetland is the presence of dragonfl y and damselfl y larvae. These are rarely found in moving streams because they require emergent vegetation such as cattails for resting, and for laying their eggs. You may also fi nd considerably more swimming beetles (Order Coleoptera) or boatmen and backswimmers (Order Hemiptera) in a wetland than in a stream, because they do better in still water. Zooplankton are also typically found in wetland ponds. Look for Daphnia and other microscopic animals swimming in the water. Animals found in moving water may be more stream lined or have adaptations for clinging to rocks compared to animals who live in still water. They may be less streamlined and have adaptations for swimming. 2. What features of those habitats might have caused these differences? The most obvious difference between the two habitats is fl ow. Water slowly moves through a wetland, but there is not any measurable velocity. Materials settle in these conditions, typically resulting in a soft, mucky bottom rather than the rocky bottom of many fast streams. Standing water may warm up faster than running water, resulting in changes in oxygen. Both systems have standing plants and mats of plants that cover some of the surfaces, but a pond/wetland is much more likely to have an abundance of suspended single celled plants (algae). 64

Macroinvertebrate Sorting - Wetlands Name: Group #: Date: Site ID: Worksheet MACROINVERTEBRATES TALLY OF TYPES OF INDIVIDUALS Ephemeroptera (mayflies) Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) Plecoptera (stoneflies) Trichoptera (caddisflies) Diptera (flies) Megaloptera (fishflies and dobsonflies) Coleptera (beetles) Amphipoda (shrimp and scuds) Isopoda (sow bugs) Decapoda (crayfish) Gastropoda (snails) Bivalvia (bussels and clams) Oligochaeta (All segmented worms except leeches) Hirudinea (leeches) Other 65

Sampling Macroinvertebrate Sampling - Wetlands Time 40 minutes Persons 2 Materials - kick net plastic pan transfer pipettes plastic petri dishes magnifying glasses dichotomous key ruler OPTIONAL 5 gallon bucket for decanting waders Step 1 - Choose your sample site Select sampling reaches that are safe and easily accessed by everyone in your group. Step 2 - Collect your sample 1. Wade into the water and scoop material from the wetland bottom. Be sure to not scoop up too much sediment with your sample. 2. Push and pull the net through aquatic vegetation. 3. Hand pick organisms from sticks and other structures. 4. Continue this process until you have approximately 100 organisms. Step 3 - Empty your sample 1. Hold your sampling net over a plastic pan and use a bucket of water to wash the material into the pan. 2. If your sample contains a lot of sediment, stir the sample in the pan to suspend the animals, and then pour the suspended material back into your net. Rinse the sediment from the pan, and then wash the animals from the net back into the pan. Step 4 - Sort out 100 macroinvertebrates 1. Pour most of the water from the pan so that materials and animals are no longer floating. Distribute the material evenly in the bottom of the pan. 2. Take a ruler and divide the material in half. Remove one half of the material from the pan. 3. Redistribute the material again over the bottom of the pan and divide this material again with a ruler. 4. Continue this process until you have a sample with about 100 organisms total. 5. Add some stream water back into the pan for easier sorting. 6. Sort and identify the macroinvertebrates using the key, petri dishes, and pipettes. 7. Keep track of the number of the types of organisms on the macroinvertebrate sorting worksheet. For example, if you collect two mayflies, but they have distinct differences, then you have two types of mayflies. 66

Key to Macroinvertebrate Life in Ponds and Rivers in Utah No Shells Shells Key to Aquatic Invertebrates in Utah No legs Legs Single Shell Double Shell Worm like With tentacles, brushes or Clams, Mussels (Bivalvia) Snails (Gastropoda) Leech (Hirudinea) Segmented worm (Oligochaeta) Flat worm (Turbellaria) Fly larve (Diptera) Fly larve 3 pairs of legs 4 pair of legs 10 + legs Wings No Wings Leathery wings Beetle-like, hard wings Water mite (Trombidiformes) Sowbug (Isopod) Scud (Amphipod) Crayfish (Decapoda) 3 tails 1 or 2 tails No tails Water Bugs (Hemiptera) Water Beetles (Coleoptera) Beetle Larva Alderfly (Megaloptera) Mayfly (Ephemeroptera) Caddisfly (Trichoptera) Stonefly (Plecoptera) http://www.extension.usu.edu/waterquality Images courtesy of USU Water Quality Extension and University of Wisconsin Extension Environmental Resources Center. IMAGES NOT TO SCALE Damselfly (Odonata) Mayfly (Ephemeroptera) Alderlfy (Megaloptera) Beetle Larva (Coleoptera) Aquatic Moth (Lepidoptera) Caddisfly (Trichoptera) Dragonfly (Odonata) Resource 67

68